![]() | This article needs to be updated.(April 2024) |
Solar power in Texas, a portion of total energy in Texas, includes utility-scale solar power plants as well as local distributed generation, mostly from rooftop photovoltaics. The western portion of the state especially has abundant open land areas, with some of the greatest solar and wind potential in the country. [2] [3] Development activities there are also encouraged by relatively simple permitting and significant available transmission capacity. [4] [5]
The capacity of large solar farms in Texas has increased substantially in recent years. Facilities sized between 5 and 50 MW began to come online throughout the state between about 2010 and 2015. [6] [7] [8] [9] Since then, progressively larger farms have been constructed in the western counties, with the electricity being contracted by utilities which serve the more populated central and eastern regions. [10] [11] [12] [13] The three largest operating facilities as of 2018 are the 180 MW Upton [10] farm in Upton County, and the 157 MW Roserock [11] and 154 MW Buckthorn [12] farms in Pecos County. Smaller installations by individuals, cooperatives, and businesses are also continuing to add significant capacity, with some of top contractors in the state including Meridian Solar, Longhorn Solar, Axium Solar and Native. [14]
Year | Capacity | Change | % Change |
---|---|---|---|
2007 | 3.2 | ||
2008 | 4.4 | 1.2 | 38% |
2009 | 8.6 | 4.2 | 95% |
2010 | 34.5 | 25.9 | 301% |
2011 | 85.6 | 51.1 | 148% |
2012 | 140.3 | 54.7 | 64% |
2013 | 215.9 | 75.6 | 54% |
2014 | 387 | 129 | 79% |
2015 | 594 | 207 | 53% |
2016 | 1,269 | 675 | 113% |
2017 | 1,982 | 713 | 56% |
2018 | 2,925 | 943 | 48% |
2019 | 4,324.3 | 1,399.3 | 48% |
2020 | 7,784.6 | 3,460.3 | 80% |
2021 | 13,844.9 | 6,060.3 | 78% |
2022 | 17,247 | 3,402.1 | 25% |
2023 | 22,872 | 5,625 | 33% |
Using data available from the U.S. Energy Information Agency's Electric Power Annual 2017 [21] and "Electric Power Monthly Data Browser", [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] the following tables summarize Texas's solar energy posture.
Year | Facilities | Summer capacity (MW) | Capacity factor | Yearly growth of generating capacity |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 52 | 1,948.2 | 0.196 | 57.1% |
2017 | 39 | 1,240.2 | 0.201 | 114% |
2016 | 578.9 | 0.144 | 82% | |
2015 | 317.9 | 0.144 | 71% | |
2014 | 185.7 | 0.173 | ||
Capacity factor for each year was computed from the end-of-year summer capacity.
2018 data is from Electric Power Monthly and is subject to change.
Year | Total | % growth | % of TX renewables | % of TX total | % of US solar | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | ||||
2011 | 29 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
2012 | 120 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 13 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 15 | ||||
2013 | 163 | 8 | 10 | 15 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 15 | 14 | 9 | 14 | ||||
2014 | 283 | 73% | 0.70% | 0.06% | 1.5% | 11 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 26 | 26 | 30 | 32 | 34 | 37 | 26 | 17 |
2015 | 401 | 42% | 0.80% | 0.09% | 1.6% | 20 | 20 | 25 | 26 | 26 | 41 | 47 | 50 | 43 | 36 | 22 | 45 |
2016 | 732 | 32.9% | 1.2% | 0.16% | 2.0% | 44 | 54 | 51 | 53 | 49 | 65 | 71 | 58 | 78 | 78 | 65 | 66 |
2017 | 2,188 | 199% | 3.0% | 0.48% | 4.1% | 88 | 113 | 175 | 199 | 240 | 231 | 242 | 218 | 182 | 201 | 152 | 147 |
2018 | 3,206 | 52.9% | 4.1% | 0.70% | 5.0% | 204 | 195 | 254 | 250 | 294 | 380 | 365 | 352 | 268 | 217 | 233 | 194 |
2019 | 4,367 | 241 | 239 | 289 | 428 | 398 | 477 | 491 | 464 | 396 | 360 | 272 | 312 | ||||
2020 | 8,538 | 354 | 420 | 443 | 572 | 842 | 916 | 1,166 | 1,075 | 843 | 727 | 591 | 589 | ||||
2021 | 14,137 | 648 | 647 | 1,002 | 955 | 1,233 | 1,424 | 1,546 | 1,615 | 1,638 | 1,361 | 1,069 | 999 | ||||
2022 | 22,165 | 1,312 | 1,411 | 1,690 | 1,764 | 2,106 | 2,406 | 2,662 | 2,227 | 2,339 | 1,894 | 1,244 | 1,110 | ||||
2023 | 32,402 | 1,545 | 1,474 | 2,094 | 2,603 | 3,072 | 3,544 | 3,967 | 3,947 | 3,303 | 2,630 | 1,946 | 2,278 | ||||
2024 | 20,912 | 2,263 | 2,679 | 3,303 | 3,509 | 4,129 | 5,028 |
Beginning with the 2014 data year, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) has estimated the distributed solar generation and distributed solar capacity. [27] These non-utility-scale appraisals evaluate that Texas generated the following amounts of additional solar energy:
Year | Summer capacity (MW) | Electric energy (GWh or M kWh) |
---|---|---|
2020 | 1092.6 | 1612 |
2019 | 670.5 | 1001 |
2018 | 474.7 | 715 |
2017 | 309.1 | 476 |
2016 | 277.1 | 391 |
2015 | 147.2 | 223 |
2014 | 96 | 141 |
Covering half of the roof with 10% efficient photovoltaics is sufficient to generate all of the electricity used by an average family in Texas. Solar farms are more cost effective in West Texas, where insolation levels are greater. [29] The US uses about 100 quadrillion British thermal units (29,000 TWh ) of energy each year. [30] This number is expected to be reduced by 50% by 2050, due to efficiency increases. [31] Texas has the potential to generate 22,787 TWh/year, more than any other state, from 7.743 TW of concentrated solar power plants, using 34% of Texas, [32] and 131.2 TWh/year from 97.8 GW of rooftop photovoltaic panels, 34.6% of the electricity used in the state in 2013. [33] The 1,310-megawatt Samson Solar farm is under construction in northeastern Texas. [34]
Texas electricity consumption in 2010 was 358.458 TWh, more than any other state, and 9.5% of the US total. [35]
Solar power includes solar farms as well as local distributed generation, mostly on rooftops and increasingly from community solar arrays. In 2023, utility-scale solar power generated 164.5 terawatt-hours (TWh), or 3.9% of electricity in the United States. Total solar generation that year, including estimated small-scale photovoltaic generation, was 238 TWh.
Solar power in Nevada is growing due to a Renewable Portfolio Standard which requires 50% renewable energy by 2030. The state has abundant open land areas and some of the best solar potential in the country.
Solar power in Arizona has the potential to, according to then-Governor Janet Napolitano, make Arizona "the Persian Gulf of solar energy". In 2012, Arizona had 1,106 MW of photovoltaic (PV) solar power systems, and 6 MW of concentrated solar power (CSP), bringing the total to over 1,112 megawatts (MW) of solar power. As an example, the Solana Generating Station, a 280 MW parabolic trough solar plant, when commissioned in 2013, was the largest parabolic trough plant in the world and the first U.S. solar plant with molten salt thermal energy storage.
Solar power in Colorado has grown rapidly, partly because of one of the most favorable net metering laws in the country, with no limit on the number of users. The state was the first in the nation to establish a Renewable Portfolio Standard for its electric utilities.
Solar power in Massachusetts has been increasing rapidly, due to Section 1603 grants for installations that began before December 31, 2011, and the sale of SRECs for $0.30/kWh, which allows payback for the system within 5 or 6 years, and generates income for the life of the system. For systems installed after December 31, 2011, and before December 31, 2016, the 30% tax grant becomes a 30% tax credit. There has been an appeal to the Congress to extend the 1603 program, the grant program, for an additional year.
Solar power has been increasing rapidly in the U.S. state of North Carolina, from less than 1 MW (megawatts) in 2007 to 6,152 MW in 2019, when it had the second-largest installed PV capacity of all states.
Solar power in Nebraska is used for only a very small percentage of the state's electricity, although it is rapidly becoming competitive with grid electricity, due to the decrease in cost and the 30% tax credit, which can be used to install systems of any size. In 2024, the state ranked 44th among the 50 U.S. states with 203 MW of installed capacity.
Solar power in Louisiana is ranked 34th for installed solar PV capacity as of 2017 by the Solar Energy Industry Association. The state's "solar friendliness" according to Solar Power Rocks has fallen to 50th place for 2018 as the state credit program ends and full 1:1 retail net metering is being phased out. Taxpayers still benefit from federal incentive programs such as the 30 percent tax credit, which applies to business and residential solar photovoltaic and thermal energy systems of any size.
Solar power in Ohio has been increasing, as the cost of photovoltaics has decreased. Ohio installed 10 MW of solar in 2015. Ohio adopted a net metering rule which allows any customer generating up to 25 kW to use net metering, with the kilowatt hour surplus rolled over each month, and paid by the utility once a year at the generation rate upon request. For hospitals there is no limit on size, but two meters are required, one for generation, the other for utility supplied power.
Solar power in Indiana has been growing in recent years due to new technological improvements and a variety of regulatory actions and financial incentives, particularly a 30% federal tax credit for any size project.
Mississippi has substantial potential for solar power, though it remains an underutilized generation method. The rate of installations has increased in recent years, reaching 438 MW of installed capacity in early 2023, ranking 36th among the states. Rooftop photovoltaics could provide 31.2% of all electricity used in Mississippi from 11,700 MW if solar panels were installed on every available roof.
Solar power in Oklahoma can provide 44.1% of all electricity used in Oklahoma from 19,300 MW of rooftop solar panels. This scenario is extremely unlikely though because the cost of electricity in Oklahoma is among the lowest in the nation.
Solar power in Alabama on rooftops could theoretically provide 29.8% of all electricity used in Alabama, with 20,400 MW of solar panels potentially installed on rooftops.
Solar power in Illinois has been increasing, as the cost of photovoltaics has decreased. As of the end of 2020, Illinois had 465 megawatts (MW) of installed photovoltaic and concentrated solar power capacity combined employing over 5,200 jobs. Illinois adopted a net metering rule which allows customers generating up to 40 kW to use net metering, with the kilowatt hour surplus rolled over each month, and lost at the end of either April or October, as selected by the customer. In 2011, the limit was raised to 2 MW, but is not net metering, as the term is commonly known, as it uses two meters for systems larger than 40 kW.
Solar power in Minnesota expanded significantly in the early 2010s as a result of the cost decrease of photovoltaics and favorable policies. By 2016, it began to grow quickly.
Solar power in Idaho comprised 550 MW in 2019. A 2016 report by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimated that rooftops alone have the potential to host 4,700 MW of solar panels, and thus provide 26.4% of all electricity used in Idaho. A large increase in the state's solar generating capacity began starting year 2015 when 461 MW of solar power was contracted to be built in Idaho.
Solar power in Montana on rooftops could provide 28% of all electricity used in Montana from 3,200 MW of solar panels.
Solar power in Vermont provides almost 11% of the state's in-state electricity production as of 2018. A 2009 study indicated that distributed solar on rooftops can provide 18% of all electricity used in Vermont. A 2012 estimate suggests that a typical 5 kW system costing $25,000 before credits and utility savings will pay for itself in 10 years, and generate a profit of $34,956 over the rest of its 25-year life.
Solar power in Virginia on rooftops is estimated to be capable of providing 32.4% of electricity used in Virginia using 28,500 MW of solar panels. Installing solar panels provides a 6.8% return on investment in Virginia, and a 5 kW array would return a profit of $16,041 over its 25 year life.
Solar power in Tennessee is capable of producing much of the state's electricity; however, the industry remains in early stages in the state. With 129 MW of solar power in 2015, Tennessee ranked 20th among states for installed solar capacity.