Original author(s) | Precision Insight, Tungsten Graphics |
---|---|
Developer(s) | freedesktop.org |
Initial release | August 1998 [1] |
Stable release | 2.4.x / February 2009 |
Written in | C |
Platform | POSIX |
Type | Framework / API |
License | MIT and other licenses [2] |
Website | dri |
Original author(s) | Kristian Høgsberg et al. |
---|---|
Developer(s) | freedesktop.org |
Initial release | September 4, 2008 [3] |
Stable release | 2.8 / July 11, 2012 [4] |
Written in | C |
Platform | POSIX |
Type | Framework / API |
License | MIT and other licenses [2] |
Website | dri |
Original author(s) | Keith Packard et al. |
---|---|
Developer(s) | freedesktop.org |
Initial release | November 1, 2013 [5] |
Stable release | 1.0 / November 1, 2013 [5] |
Written in | C |
Platform | POSIX |
Type | Framework / API |
License | MIT and other licenses [2] |
Website | dri |
The Direct Rendering Infrastructure (DRI) is the framework comprising the modern Linux graphics stack which allows unprivileged user-space programs to issue commands to graphics hardware without conflicting with other programs. [6] The main use of DRI is to provide hardware acceleration for the Mesa implementation of OpenGL. DRI has also been adapted to provide OpenGL acceleration on a framebuffer console without a display server running. [7]
DRI implementation is scattered through the X Server and its associated client libraries, Mesa 3D and the Direct Rendering Manager kernel subsystem. [6] All of its source code is free software.
In the classic X Window System architecture the X Server is the only process with exclusive access to the graphics hardware, and therefore the one which does the actual rendering on the framebuffer. All that X clients do is communicate with the X Server to dispatch rendering commands. Those commands are hardware independent, meaning that the X11 protocol provides an API that abstracts the graphics device so the X clients don't need to know or worry about the specifics of the underlying hardware. Any hardware-specific code lives inside the Device Dependent X, the part of the X Server that manages each type of video card or graphics adapter and which is also often called the video or graphics driver.
The rise of 3D rendering has shown the limits of this architecture. 3D graphics applications tend to produce large amounts of commands and data, all of which must be dispatched to the X Server for rendering. As the amount of inter-process communication (IPC) between the X client and X Server increased, the 3D rendering performance suffered to the point that X driver developers concluded that in order to take advantage of 3D hardware capabilities of the latest graphics cards a new IPC-less architecture was required. X clients should have direct access to graphics hardware rather than relying on another process to do so, saving all the IPC overhead. This approach is called "direct rendering" as opposed to the "indirect rendering" provided by the classical X architecture. The Direct Rendering Infrastructure was initially developed to allow any X client to perform 3D rendering using this "direct rendering" approach.
Nothing prevents DRI from being used to implement accelerated 2D direct rendering within an X client. [3] Simply no one has had the need to do so because the 2D indirect rendering performance was good enough.
The basic architecture of the Direct Rendering Infrastructure involves three main components: [8]
In the original DRI architecture, due to the memory size of video cards at that time, there was a single instance of the screen front buffer and back buffer (also of the ancillary depth buffer and stencil buffer), shared by all the DRI clients and the X Server. [11] [12] All of them rendered directly onto the back buffer, that was swapped with the front buffer at vertical blanking interval time. [11] In order to render to the back buffer, a DRI process should ensure that the rendering was clipped to the area reserved for its window. [11] [12]
The synchronization with the X Server was done through signals and a shared memory buffer called the SAREA. [12] The access to the DRM device was exclusive, so any DRI client had to lock it at the beginning of a rendering operation. Other users of the device —including the X Server— were blocked in the meantime, and they had to wait until the lock was released at the end of the current rendering operation, even if it wouldn't be any conflict between both operations. [12] Another drawback was that operations didn't retain memory allocations after the current DRI process released its lock on the device, so any data uploaded to the graphics memory such as textures were lost for upcoming operations, causing a significant impact on graphics performance.
Nowadays DRI1 is considered completely obsolete and must not be used.
Due to the increasing popularity of compositing window managers like Compiz, the Direct Rendering Infrastructure had to be redesigned so that X clients could also support redirection to "offscreen pixmaps" while doing direct rendering. Regular X clients already respected the redirection to a separate pixmap provided by the X Server as a render target —the so-called offscreen pixmap—, but DRI clients continued to do the rendering directly into the shared backbuffer, effectively bypassing the compositing window manager. [11] [13] The ultimate solution was to change the way DRI handled the render buffers, which led to a completely different DRI extension with a new set of operations, and also major changes in the Direct Rendering Manager. [3] The new extension was named "DRI2", although it's not a later version but a different extension not even compatible with the original DRI —in fact both have coexisted within the X Server for a long time.
In DRI2, instead of a single shared (back) buffer, every DRI client gets its own private back buffer [11] [12] —along with their associated depth and stencil buffers— to render its window content using the hardware acceleration. The DRI client then swaps it with a false "front buffer", [12] which is used by the compositing window manager as one of the sources to compose (build) the final screen back buffer to be swapped at the VBLANK interval with the real front buffer.
To handle all these new buffers, the Direct Rendering Manager had to incorporate new functionality, specifically a graphics memory manager. DRI2 was initially developed using the experimental TTM memory manager, [11] [13] but it was later rewritten to use GEM after it was chosen as the definitive DRM memory manager. [14] The new DRI2 internal buffer management model also solved two major performance bottlenecks present in the original DRI implementation:
In DRI2, the allocation of the private offscreen buffers (back buffer, fake front buffer, depth buffer, stencil buffer, ...) for a window is done by the X Server itself. [15] [16] DRI clients retrieve those buffers to do the rendering into the window by calling operations such as DRI2GetBuffers and DRI2GetBuffersWithFormat available in the DRI2 extension. [3] Internally, DRI2 uses GEM names—a type of global handle provided by the GEM API that allows two processes accessing a DRM device to refer to the same buffer— for passing around "references" to those buffers through the X11 protocol. [16] The reason why the X Server is in charge of the buffer allocation of the render buffers of a window is that the GLX extension allows for multiple X clients to do OpenGL rendering cooperatively in the same window. [15] This way, the X Server manages the whole lifecycle of the render buffers along the entire rendering process and knows when it can safely recycle or discard them. When a window resize is performed, the X Server is also responsible for allocating new render buffers matching the new window size, and notifying the change to the DRI client(s) rendering into the window using an InvalidateBuffers event, so they would retrieve the GEM names of the new buffers. [15]
The DRI2 extension provides other core operations for the DRI clients, such as finding out which DRM device and driver they should use (DRI2Connect) or getting authenticated by the X Server in order to be able to use the rendering and buffer facilities of the DRM device (DRI2Authenticate). [3] The presentation of the rendered buffers in the screen is performed using the DRI2CopyRegion and DRI2SwapBuffers requests. DRI2CopyRegion can be used to do a copy between the fake front buffer and the real front buffer, but it doesn't provide any synchronization with the vertical blanking interval, so it can cause tearing. DRI2SwapBuffers, on the other hand, performs a VBLANK-synchronized swap between back and front buffer, if it's supported and both buffers have the same size, or a copy (blit) otherwise. [3] [15]
Although DRI2 was a significant improvement over the original DRI, the new extension also introduced some new issues. [15] [16] In 2013, a third iteration of the Direct Rendering Infrastructure known as DRI3 was developed in order to fix those issues. [17]
The main differences of DRI3 compared to DRI2 are:
Buffer allocation on the client side breaks GLX assumptions in the sense that it's no longer possible for multiple GLX applications to render cooperatively in the same window. On the plus side, the fact that the DRI client is in charge of its own buffers throughout their lifetime brings many advantages. For example, it is easy for the DRI3 client to ensure that the size of the render buffers always match the current size of the window, and thereby eliminate the artifacts due to the lack of synchronization of buffer sizes between client and server that plagued window resizing in DRI2. [15] [16] [18] A better performance is also achieved because now DRI3 clients save the extra round trip waiting for the X Server to send the render buffers. [16] DRI3 clients, and especially compositor window managers, can take advantage of keeping older buffers of previous frames and reusing them as the basis on which to render only the damaged parts of a window as another performance optimization. [15] [16] The DRI3 extension no longer needs to be modified to support new particular buffer formats, since they are now handled directly between the DRI client driver and the DRM kernel driver. [15] The use of file descriptors, on the other hand, allows the kernel to perform a safe cleanup of any unused GEM buffer object —one with no reference to it. [15] [16]
Technically, DRI3 consists of two different extensions, the "DRI3" extension and the "Present" extension. [17] [19] The main purpose of the DRI3 extension is to implement the mechanism to share direct rendered buffers between DRI clients and the X Server. [18] [19] [20] DRI clients allocate and use GEM buffers objects as rendering targets, while the X Server represents these render buffers using a type of X11 object called "pixmap". DRI3 provides two operations, DRI3PixmapFromBuffer and DRI3BufferFromPixmap, one to create a pixmap (in "X Server space") from a GEM buffer object (in "DRI client space"), and the other to do the reverse and get a GEM buffer object from an X pixmap. [18] [19] [20] In these DRI3 operations GEM buffer objects are passed as DMA-BUF file descriptors instead of GEM names. DRI3 also provides a way to share synchronization objects between the DRI client and the X Server, allowing both a serialized access to the shared buffer. [19] Unlike DRI2, the initial DRI3Open operation —the first every DRI client must request to know which DRM device to use— returns an already open file descriptor to the device node instead of the device node filename, with any required authentication procedure already performed in advance by the X Server. [18] [19]
DRI3 provides no mechanism to show the rendered buffers on the screen, but relies on another extension, the Present extension, to do so. [20] Present is so named because its main task is to "present" buffers on the screen, meaning that it handles the update of the framebuffer using the contents of the rendered buffers delivered by client applications. [19] Screen updates have to be done at the proper time, normally during the VBLANK interval in order to avoid display artifacts such as tearing . Present also handles the synchronization of screen updates to the VBLANK interval. [21] It also keeps the X client informed about the instant each buffer is really shown on the screen using events, so the client can synchronize its rendering process with the current screen refresh rate.
Present accepts any X pixmap as the source for a screen update. [21] Since pixmaps are standard X objects, Present can be used not only by DRI3 clients performing direct rendering, but also by any X client rendering on a pixmap by any means. [18] For example, most existing non-GL based GTK+ and Qt applications used to do double buffered pixmap rendering using XRender. The Present extension can also be used by these applications to achieve efficient and non-tearing screen updates. This is the reason why Present was developed as a separate standalone extension instead of being part of DRI3. [18]
Apart from allowing non-GL X clients to synchronize with VBLANK, Present brings other advantages. DRI3 graphics performance is better because Present is more efficient than DRI2 in swapping buffers. [19] A number of OpenGL extensions that weren't available with DRI2 are now supported based on new features provided by Present. [19]
Present provides two main operations to X clients: update a region of a window using part of or all the contents of a pixmap (PresentPixmap) and set the type of presentation events related to a certain window that the client wants to be notified about (PresentSelectInput). [19] [21] There are three presentation events about which a window can notify an X client: when an ongoing presentation operation —normally from a call to PresentPixmap— has been completed (PresentCompleteNotify), when a pixmap used by a PresentPixmap operation is ready to be reused (PresentIdleNotify) and when the window configuration —mostly window size— changes (PresentConfigureNotify). [19] [21] Whether a PresentPixmap operation performs a direct copy (blit) onto the front buffer or a swap of the entire back buffer with the front buffer is an internal detail of the Present extension implementation, instead of an explicit choice of the X client as it was in DRI2.
![]() | This section needs to be updated.(June 2020) |
Several open source DRI drivers have been written, including ones for ATI Mach64, ATI Rage128, ATI Radeon, 3dfx Voodoo3 through Voodoo5, Matrox G200 through G400, SiS 300-series, Intel i810 through i965, S3 Savage, VIA UniChrome graphics chipsets, and nouveau for Nvidia. Some graphics vendors have written closed-source DRI drivers, including ATI and PowerVR Kyro.
The various versions of DRI have been implemented by various operating systems, amongst others by the Linux kernel, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and OpenSolaris.
The project was started by Jens Owen and Kevin E. Martin from Precision Insight (funded by Silicon Graphics and Red Hat). [1] [22] It was first made widely available as part of XFree86 4.0 [1] [23] and is now part of the X.Org Server. It is currently maintained by the free software community.
Work on DRI2 started at the 2007 X Developers' Summit from a proposal by Kristian Høgsberg. [24] [25] Høgsberg himself wrote the new DRI2 extension and the modifications to Mesa and GLX. [26] In March 2008 DRI2 was mostly done, [27] [28] [29] but it couldn't make into X.Org Server version 1.5 [14] and had to wait until version 1.6 from February 2009. [30] The DRI2 extension was officially included in the X11R7.5 release of October 2009. [31] The first public version of the DRI2 protocol (2.0) was announced in April 2009. [32] Since then there have been several revisions, the most recent being version 2.8 from July 2012. [4]
Due to several limitations of DRI2, a new extension called DRI-Next was proposed by Keith Packard and Emma Anholt at the X.Org Developer's Conference 2012. [15] The extension was proposed again as DRI3000 at Linux.conf.au 2013. [16] [17] DRI3 and Present extensions were developed during 2013 and merged into the X.Org Server 1.15 release from December 2013. [33] [34] The first and only version of the DRI3 protocol (1.0) was released in November 2013. [5]
The X Window System is a windowing system for bitmap displays, common on Unix-like operating systems.
In computing, a windowing system is a software suite that manages separately different parts of display screens. It is a type of graphical user interface (GUI) which implements the WIMP paradigm for a user interface.
DirectFB was a software library with a small memory footprint that provides graphics acceleration, input device handling and abstraction layer, and integrated windowing system with support for translucent windows and multiple display layers on top of the Linux framebuffer without requiring any kernel modifications. DirectFB is free and open-source software subject to the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
X.Org Server is the free and open-source implementation of the X Window System (X11) display server stewarded by the X.Org Foundation.
GLX is an extension to the X Window System core protocol providing an interface between OpenGL and the X Window System as well as extensions to OpenGL itself. It enables programs wishing to use OpenGL to do so within a window provided by the X Window System. GLX distinguishes two "states": indirect state and direct state.
The X video extension, often abbreviated as XVideo or Xv, is a video output mechanism for the X Window System. The protocol was designed by David Carver; the specification for version 2 of the protocol was written in July 1991. It is mainly used today to resize video content in the video controller hardware in order to enlarge a given video or to watch it in full screen mode. Without XVideo, X would have to do this scaling on the main CPU. That requires a considerable amount of processing power, which could slow down or degrade the video stream; video controllers are specifically designed for this kind of computation, so can do it much more cheaply. Similarly, the X video extension can have the video controller perform color space conversions, and change the contrast, brightness, and hue of a displayed video stream.
In computing, EXA is a graphics acceleration architecture of the X.Org Server designed to replace XAA and to make the XRender extension more usable, with only minor changes needed to adapt obsolete XFree86 video drivers written to use XAA; it was designed by Zack Rusin and announced at LinuxTag 2005 and first released with X.Org Server version 6.9/7.0.
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) is a subsystem of the Linux kernel responsible for interfacing with GPUs of modern video cards. DRM exposes an API that user-space programs can use to send commands and data to the GPU and perform operations such as configuring the mode setting of the display. DRM was first developed as the kernel-space component of the X Server Direct Rendering Infrastructure, but since then it has been used by other graphic stack alternatives such as Wayland and standalone applications and libraries such as SDL2 and Kodi.
Mesa, also called Mesa3D and The Mesa 3D Graphics Library, is an open source implementation of OpenGL, Vulkan, and other graphics API specifications. Mesa translates these specifications to vendor-specific graphics hardware drivers.
Xgl is an obsolete display server implementation supporting the X Window System protocol designed to take advantage of modern graphics cards via their OpenGL drivers, layered on top of OpenGL. It supports hardware acceleration of all X, OpenGL and XVideo applications and graphical effects by a compositing window manager such as Compiz or Beryl. The project was started by David Reveman of Novell and first released on January 2, 2006. It was removed from the X.org server in favor of AIGLX on June 12, 2008.
A free and open-source graphics device driver is a software stack which controls computer-graphics hardware and supports graphics-rendering application programming interfaces (APIs) and is released under a free and open-source software license. Graphics device drivers are written for specific hardware to work within a specific operating system kernel and to support a range of APIs used by applications to access the graphics hardware. They may also control output to the display if the display driver is part of the graphics hardware. Most free and open-source graphics device drivers are developed by the Mesa project. The driver is made up of a compiler, a rendering API, and software which manages access to the graphics hardware.
Desktop Window Manager is the compositing window manager in Microsoft Windows since Windows Vista that enables the use of hardware acceleration to render the graphical user interface of Windows.
Accelerated Indirect GLX ("AIGLX") is an open source project founded by Red Hat and the Fedora community, led by Kristian Høgsberg, to allow accelerated indirect GLX rendering capabilities to the X.Org Server and DRI drivers. This allows remote X clients to get fully hardware accelerated rendering over the GLX protocol; coincidentally, this development was required for OpenGL compositing window managers to function with hardware acceleration.
The MIT Shared Memory Extension or MIT-SHM or XShm is an X Window System extension for exchange of image data between client and server using shared memory. The mechanism only works when both pieces are on the same computer.
VirtualGL is an open-source software package that redirects the 3D rendering commands from Unix and Linux OpenGL applications to 3D accelerator hardware in a dedicated server and sends the rendered output to a (thin) client located elsewhere on the network. On the server side, VirtualGL consists of a library that handles the redirection and a wrapper program that instructs applications to use this library. Clients can connect to the server either using a remote X11 connection or using an X11 proxy such as a VNC server. In case of an X11 connection some client-side VirtualGL software is also needed to receive the rendered graphics output separately from the X11 stream. In case of a VNC connection no specific client-side software is needed other than the VNC client itself.
MiniGLX is a specification for an application programming interface which facilitates OpenGL rendering on systems without windowing systems, e.g. Linux without an X Window System or embedded systems without a windowing system. The interface is a subset of the GLX interface, plus a minimal set of Xlib-like functions.
nouveau is a free and open-source graphics device driver for Nvidia video cards and the Tegra family of SoCs written by independent software engineers, with minor help from Nvidia employees.
Wayland is a communication protocol that specifies the communication between a display server and its clients, as well as a C library implementation of that protocol. A display server using the Wayland protocol is called a Wayland compositor, because it additionally performs the task of a compositing window manager.
EGL is an interface between Khronos rendering APIs and the underlying native platform windowing system. EGL handles graphics context management, surface/buffer binding, rendering synchronization, and enables "high-performance, accelerated, mixed-mode 2D and 3D rendering using other Khronos APIs." EGL is managed by the non-profit technology consortium Khronos Group.
Nvidia Optimus is a computer GPU switching technology created by Nvidia which, depending on the resource load generated by client software applications, will seamlessly switch between two graphics adapters within a computer system in order to provide either maximum performance or minimum power draw from the system's graphics rendering hardware.