Dollo's law of irreversibility

Last updated
Once an organism has evolved in a certain way, it will not return exactly to a previous form. This is illustrated here in two dimensions; in reality, both biomolecules and organisms evolve in many different dimensions. Dollo's law of irreversibility.svg
Once an organism has evolved in a certain way, it will not return exactly to a previous form. This is illustrated here in two dimensions; in reality, both biomolecules and organisms evolve in many different dimensions.

Dollo's law of irreversibility (also known as Dollo's law and Dollo's principle), proposed in 1893 [1] by Belgian paleontologist Louis Dollo states that, "an organism never returns exactly to a former state, even if it finds itself placed in conditions of existence identical to those in which it has previously lived ... it always keeps some trace of the intermediate stages through which it has passed." [2]

Contents

The statement is often misinterpreted as claiming that evolution is not reversible, [3] or that lost structures and organs cannot reappear in the same form by any process of devolution. [4] [5] According to Richard Dawkins, the law is "really just a statement about the statistical improbability of following exactly the same evolutionary trajectory twice (or, indeed, any particular trajectory), in either direction". [6] Stephen Jay Gould suggested that irreversibility forecloses certain evolutionary pathways once broad forms have emerged: "[For example], once you adopt the ordinary body plan of a reptile, hundreds of options are forever closed, and future possibilities must unfold within the limits of inherited design." [7]

This principle is classically applied to morphology, particularly of fossils, but may also be used to describe molecular events, such as individual mutations or gene losses.

Use in phylogenetics

In maximum parsimony, Dollo parsimony refers to a model whereby a characteristic is gained only one time and can never be regained if it is lost. [8] For example, the evolution and repeated loss of teeth in vertebrates could be well-modeled under Dollo parsimony, whereby teeth made from hydroxyapatite evolved only once at the origin of vertebrates, and were then lost multiple times, in birds, turtles, and seahorses, among others. [9]

This also applies to molecular characters, such as losses or inactivation of individual genes themselves. [10] The loss of gulonolactone oxidase, the final enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of vitamin C, is responsible for the dietary requirement of vitamin C in humans, as well as many other animals. [11]

A molecular example

A 2009 study on the evolution of protein structure proposed a new mechanism for Dollo's law. It examined a hormone receptor that had evolved from an ancestral protein that was able to bind two hormones to a new protein that was specific for a single hormone. This change was produced by two amino acid substitutions, which prevent binding of the second hormone. However, several other changes subsequently occurred, which were selectively neutral as they did not affect hormone binding. When the authors tried to revert the protein back to its ancestral state by mutating the two "binding residues", they found the other changes had destabilised the ancestral state of the protein. They concluded that in order for this protein to evolve in reverse and regain its ability to bind two hormones, several independent neutral mutations would have to occur purely by chance with no selection pressure. As this is extremely unlikely, it may explain why evolution tends to run in one direction. [12]

Proposed exceptions

Although the exact threshold for violations of Dollo's law is unclear, there are several case studies whose results dispute the validity of some interpretations. For example, many taxa of gastropods have reduced shells, and some have lost coiling of their shell altogether. [13] In Stephen Jay Gould's interpretation of Dollo's law, it would not be possible to regain a coiled shell after the coiling has been lost. Nevertheless, a few genera in the slipper snail family (Calyptraeidae) may have changed their developmental timing (heterochrony) and regained a coiled shell from a limpet-like shell. [13] [14] Frietson Galis observed that many of these studies are based on either molecular phylogenies or morphological cladistic analyses that are tenuous and subject to change. [15]

Other proposed 'exceptions' include the ocelli and wings of stick insects, [16] [17] the larval stages of salamanders, [18] [19] lost toes and re-evolution of oviparity in lizards, [20] [21] lost lower teeth in frogs, [22] clavicles in non-avian theropod dinosaurs, [23] and neck, pectoral region, and upper limb musculature in primates, including the lineage leading to humans. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution</span> Change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations

Evolution is the change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. Evolution occurs when evolutionary processes such as natural selection and genetic drift act on genetic variation, resulting in certain characteristics becoming more or less common within a population over successive generations. The process of evolution has given rise to biodiversity at every level of biological organisation.

Macroevolution usually means the evolution of large-scale structures and traits that go significantly beyond the intraspecific variation found in microevolution. In other words, macroevolution is the evolution of taxa above the species level.

In biology, phylogenetics is the study of the evolutionary history and relationships among or within groups of organisms. These relationships are determined by phylogenetic inference methods that focus on observed heritable traits, such as DNA sequences, protein amino acid sequences, or morphology. The result of such an analysis is a phylogenetic tree—a diagram containing a hypothesis of relationships that reflects the evolutionary history of a group of organisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolutionary developmental biology</span> Comparison of organism developmental processes

Evolutionary developmental biology is a field of biological research that compares the developmental processes of different organisms to infer how developmental processes evolved.

Molecular evolution is the process of change in the sequence composition of cellular molecules such as DNA, RNA, and proteins across generations. The field of molecular evolution uses principles of evolutionary biology and population genetics to explain patterns in these changes. Major topics in molecular evolution concern the rates and impacts of single nucleotide changes, neutral evolution vs. natural selection, origins of new genes, the genetic nature of complex traits, the genetic basis of speciation, the evolution of development, and ways that evolutionary forces influence genomic and phenotypic changes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neutral theory of molecular evolution</span>

The neutral theory of molecular evolution holds that most evolutionary changes occur at the molecular level, and most of the variation within and between species are due to random genetic drift of mutant alleles that are selectively neutral. The theory applies only for evolution at the molecular level, and is compatible with phenotypic evolution being shaped by natural selection as postulated by Charles Darwin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pseudogene</span> Functionless relative of a gene

Pseudogenes are nonfunctional segments of DNA that resemble functional genes. Most arise as superfluous copies of functional genes, either directly by gene duplication or indirectly by reverse transcription of an mRNA transcript. Pseudogenes are usually identified when genome sequence analysis finds gene-like sequences that lack regulatory sequences needed for transcription or translation, or whose coding sequences are obviously defective due to frameshifts or premature stop codons. Pseudogenes are a type of junk DNA.

Evolvability is defined as the capacity of a system for adaptive evolution. Evolvability is the ability of a population of organisms to not merely generate genetic diversity, but to generate adaptive genetic diversity, and thereby evolve through natural selection.

Evolutionary capacitance is the storage and release of variation, just as electric capacitors store and release charge. Living systems are robust to mutations. This means that living systems accumulate genetic variation without the variation having a phenotypic effect. But when the system is disturbed, robustness breaks down, and the variation has phenotypic effects and is subject to the full force of natural selection. An evolutionary capacitor is a molecular switch mechanism that can "toggle" genetic variation between hidden and revealed states. If some subset of newly revealed variation is adaptive, it becomes fixed by genetic assimilation. After that, the rest of variation, most of which is presumably deleterious, can be switched off, leaving the population with a newly evolved advantageous trait, but no long-term handicap. For evolutionary capacitance to increase evolvability in this way, the switching rate should not be faster than the timescale of genetic assimilation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Masatoshi Nei</span> Japanese-American geneticist (1931–2023)

Masatoshi Nei was a Japanese-born American evolutionary biologist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Growth hormone receptor</span> A protein involved in the binding of the growth hormone

Growth hormone receptor is a protein that in humans is encoded by the GHR gene. GHR orthologs have been identified in most mammals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MXD4</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Max-interacting transcriptional repressor MAD4 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the MXD4 gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mollusc shell</span> Exoskeleton of an animal in the phylum Mollusca

The molluscshell is typically a calcareous exoskeleton which encloses, supports and protects the soft parts of an animal in the phylum Mollusca, which includes snails, clams, tusk shells, and several other classes. Not all shelled molluscs live in the sea; many live on the land and in freshwater.

Bovine seminal RNase (BS-RNase) is a member of the ribonuclease superfamily produced by the bovine seminal vesicles. This enzyme can not be differentiated from its members distinctly since there are more features that this enzyme shares with its family members than features that it possess alone. The research on the question of how new functions arrive in proteins in evolution led the scientists to find an uncommon consequence for a usual biological event called gene conversion in the case of the ribonuclease (RNase) protein family. The most well-known member of this family, RNase A, is expressed in the pancreas of oxen. It serves to digest RNA in intestine, and evolved from bacteria fermenting in the stomach of the first ox. The homologous RNase, called seminal RNase, differs from RNase A by 23 amino acids and is expressed in seminal plasma in the concentration of 1-1.5 mg/ml, which constitutes more than 3% of the fluid protein content. Bovine seminal ribonuclease (BS-RNase) is a homologue of RNase A with specific antitumor activity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Relaxin family peptide hormones</span> Protein family

Relaxin family peptide hormones in humans are represented by seven members: three relaxin-like (RLN) and four insulin-like (INSL) peptides: RLN1, RLN2, RNL3, INSL3, INSL4, INSL5, INSL6. This subdivision into two classes is based primarily on early findings, and does not reflect the evolutionary origins or physiological differences between peptides. For example, it is known that the genes coding for RLN3 and INSL5 arose from one ancestral gene, and INSL3 shares origin with RLN2 and its multiple duplicates: RLN1, INSL4, INSL6.

Ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) – also known as ancestral gene/sequence reconstruction/resurrection – is a technique used in the study of molecular evolution. The method uses related sequences to reconstruct an "ancestral" gene from a multiple sequence alignment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epistasis</span> Dependence of a gene mutations phenotype on mutations in other genes

Epistasis is a phenomenon in genetics in which the effect of a gene mutation is dependent on the presence or absence of mutations in one or more other genes, respectively termed modifier genes. In other words, the effect of the mutation is dependent on the genetic background in which it appears. Epistatic mutations therefore have different effects on their own than when they occur together. Originally, the term epistasis specifically meant that the effect of a gene variant is masked by that of different gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homoplasy</span> Gain or loss of the same feature independently in separate lineages during evolution

Homoplasy, in biology and phylogenetics, is the term used to describe a feature that has been gained or lost independently in separate lineages over the course of evolution. This is different from homology, which is the term used to characterize the similarity of features that can be parsimoniously explained by common ancestry. Homoplasy can arise from both similar selection pressures acting on adapting species, and the effects of genetic drift.

Constructive neutral evolution(CNE) is a theory that seeks to explain how complex systems can evolve through neutral transitions and spread through a population by chance fixation (genetic drift). Constructive neutral evolution is a competitor for both adaptationist explanations for the emergence of complex traits and hypotheses positing that a complex trait emerged as a response to a deleterious development in an organism. Constructive neutral evolution often leads to irreversible or "irremediable" complexity and produces systems which, instead of being finely adapted for performing a task, represent an excess complexity that has been described with terms such as "runaway bureaucracy" or even a "Rube Goldberg machine".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phylogenetic reconciliation</span> Technique in evolutionary study

In phylogenetics, reconciliation is an approach to connect the history of two or more coevolving biological entities. The general idea of reconciliation is that a phylogenetic tree representing the evolution of an entity can be drawn within another phylogenetic tree representing an encompassing entity to reveal their interdependence and the evolutionary events that have marked their shared history. The development of reconciliation approaches started in the 1980s, mainly to depict the coevolution of a gene and a genome, and of a host and a symbiont, which can be mutualist, commensalist or parasitic. It has also been used for example to detect horizontal gene transfer, or understand the dynamics of genome evolution.

References

  1. ↑ Dollo, Louis (1893). "Les lois de l'évolution" (PDF). Bull. Soc. Belge Geol. Pal. Hydr. VII: 164–166.
  2. ↑ Gould, S. J. (1970). "Dollo on Dollo's law: irreversibility and the status of evolutionary laws". Journal of the History of Biology. 3 (2): 189–212. doi:10.1007/bf00137351. PMID   11609651. S2CID   45642853.
  3. ↑ Alfarouk, Khalid O.; Shayoub, Mohammed E.A.; Muddathir, Abdel Khalig; Elhassan, Gamal O.; Bashir, Adil H.H. (22 July 2011). "Evolution of Tumor Metabolism might Reflect Carcinogenesis as a Reverse Evolution process (Dismantling of Multicellularity)". Cancers. 3 (3): 3002–3017. doi: 10.3390/cancers3033002 . PMC   3759183 . PMID   24310356.
  4. ↑ Goldberg, Emma E.; Boris Igić (2008). "On phylogenetic tests of irreversible evolution". Evolution. 62 (11): 2727–2741. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00505.x. PMID   18764918. S2CID   30703407.
  5. ↑ Collin, Rachel; Maria Pia Miglietta (2008). "Reversing opinions on Dollo's Law". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 23 (11): 602–609. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.013. PMID   18814933.
  6. ↑ Dawkins, Richard (1996) [1986]. The Blind Watchmaker . W. W. Norton. ISBN   978-0-393-31570-7.
  7. ↑ Gould, Stephen J. (2007) [1993]. Eight little piggies. Vintage Books. ISBN   978-0-09-950744-4.
  8. ↑ Farris, J. (1977). "Phylogenetic Analysis Under Dollo's Law". Systematic Zoology. 26 (1): 77–88. doi:10.1093/sysbio/26.1.77.
  9. ↑ Lin,Q.; et al. (2016). "The seahorse genome and the evolution of its specialized morphology". Nature. 540 (7633): 395–399. Bibcode:2016Natur.540..395L. doi: 10.1038/nature20595 . PMC   8127814 . PMID   27974754.
  10. ↑ Rogozin, Igor B.; Wolf, Yuri I.; Babenko, Vladimir N.; Koonin, Eugene V. (2005). Dollo parsimony and the reconstruction of genome evolution. pp. 190–200. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297306.003.0011. ISBN   9780199297306.{{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  11. ↑ Yang, Hongwen (2013). "Conserved or Lost: Molecular Evolution of the Key Gene GULO in Vertebrate Vitamin C Biosynthesis". Biochemical Genetics. 51 (5–6): 413–425. doi:10.1007/s10528-013-9574-0. PMID   23404229. S2CID   14393449.
  12. ↑ Bridgham, Jamie T.; Ortlund, Eric A.; Thornton, Joseph W. (2009). "An epistatic ratchet constrains the direction of glucocorticoid receptor evolution". Nature. 461 (7263): 515–519. Bibcode:2009Natur.461..515B. doi:10.1038/nature08249. PMC   6141187 . PMID   19779450.
  13. 1 2 Collin, R.; Cipriani, R. (2003). "Dollo's law and the re-evolution of shell coiling". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 270 (1533): 2551–2555. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2517. PMC   1691546 . PMID   14728776.
  14. ↑ Pagel, M. (2004). "Limpets break Dollo's Law". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 19 (6): 278–280. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.020. PMID   16701270.
  15. ↑ Alan Feduccia: Riddle of the Feathered Dragons: Hidden Birds of China, Yale University Press, 2012.
  16. ↑ Whiting, Michael F.; Bradler, Sven; Maxwell, Taylor (2003). "Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects". Nature. 421 (6920): 264–267. Bibcode:2003Natur.421..264W. doi:10.1038/nature01313. PMID   12529642. S2CID   962571.
  17. ↑ Bank, Sarah; Bradler, Sven (2022). "A second view on the evolution of flight in stick and leaf insects (Phasmatodea)". BMC Ecology and Evolution. 22 (1): 62. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-02018-5 . PMC   9097326 . PMID   35549660.
  18. ↑ Chippindale, P. T.; Wiens, J. J. (2005). "Re-evolution of the larval stage in the Plethodontid salamander genus Desmognathus" (PDF). Herpetological Review. 36 (2): 113–117.
  19. ↑ Marshall, C. R. (1994). "Dollo's law and the death and resurrection of genes". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91 (25): 12283–7. Bibcode:1994PNAS...9112283M. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12283 . PMC   45421 . PMID   7991619.
  20. ↑ Galis, F. (2010). "Dollo's law and the irreversibility of digit loss in Bachia". Evolution. 64 (8): 2466–76, discussion 2477–85. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01041.x. PMID   20500218. S2CID   24520027.
  21. ↑ Recknagel, Hans; Kamenos, Nicholas A.; Elmer, Kathryn R. (2018). "Common lizards break Dollo's law of irreversibility: Genome-wide phylogenomics support a single origin of viviparity and re-evolution of oviparity". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 127: 579–588. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.05.029 . PMID   29803948. S2CID   3553000.
  22. ↑ Davies, E. Frogs re-evolved lost lower teeth. BBC News. January 31, 2011. Retrieved February 9, 2011.
  23. ↑ Paul, Gregory S. (2002). Dinosaurs of the Air: the evolution and loss of flight in dinosaurs and birds. CJHU Press. p.  10. ISBN   978-0-8018-6763-7.
  24. ↑ Diogo, R.; Wood, B. (2012). "Violation of Dollo's Law: Evidence of Muscle Reversions in Primate Phylogeny and Their Implications for the Understanding of the Ontogeny, Evolution, and Anatomical Variations of Modern Humans". Evolution. 66 (10): 3267–76. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01621.x. PMID   23025614. S2CID   21754061.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.