Ducol

Last updated

Ducol or "D"-steel is the name of a number of high-strength low-alloy steels of varying composition, first developed from the early 1920s by the Scottish firm of David Colville & Sons, Motherwell.

Contents

Applications have included warship hull construction and light armouring, road bridges, and pressure vessels including locomotive steam boilers and nuclear reactors.

History

The original Ducol, or "D"-steel, is a manganese-silicon steel, a toughened version of the new, proven standard construction steels developed by David Colville & Sons just after WW1. [a]

It was an improvement on British Admiralty "HT" (High Tensile) steel, a shipbuilding and light armour steel developed c1900 and used through the end of WWI. HT was a carbon steel with a small amount of nickel, which allowed it to be hardened to a greater level without cracking (i.e. increased "toughness"). Foreign similar steels – for example, German "Low-%" Nickel Steel and U.S. High Tensile Steel (HTS) – were more complex alloys using chromium, vanadium and molybdenum. [3] [ better source needed ]

Up until about 1945, Ducol generally contained only manganese and silicon as alloying elements. More recent weldable grades (Ducol W21, W25, W30, and W30 grades A & B) include varying amounts of nickel, chromium, copper, molybdenum and vanadium.

Composition

Composition of various Ducol-type steels
Grade % C % Mn % Si % P % S % Ni % Cr % Mo % Cu % VNotes
Royal Navy "HT" steel0.35~0.400.8~1.20.15 [4]
§R. Sumida bridges 0.24~0.301.4~1.6 [5]
IJN Ducol0.25~0.301.20~1.60 ?

[6]

Ducol, RN "D"-steel0.24~0.301.500.06~0.10tracetrace [5]
§Chelsea Bridge 0.251.520.130.030.030.36 [7]
Ducol W210.231.70.5 max0.25 max [8]
Ducol W250.2 max1.5 max0.5 max0.3 max0.3 max [8]
Ducol W300.18 max1.4 max0.5 max0.8 max0.25 max0.5 max0.1 max [8]
Ducol W30
Grade A
0.11~0.171.0~1.50.4 max0.7 max0.4~0.70.2~0.280.3 max0.04~0.12 [8]
Ducol W30
Grade B
0.09~0.150.9~1.50.4 max0.7~1.00.4~0.70.2~0.280.3 max0.04~0.12 [8]
§Sizewell 'A' 0.11.4 ?0.20.50.250.1 [9]

Weldability

Although modern grades of Ducol are termed 'weldable', this doesn't necessarily mean 'easily weldable'. A 1970 report on an explosion in a cylinder made of Ducol 30 found that in Ducol W30, embrittlement of the heat-affected zone (HAZ) occurs in welds unless post-weld heat treatment takes place at a sufficient temperature (675C). [10]

In addition, the original product from the 1920s was also weldable (ie 'capable of being welded'), but with dubious results. The Imperial Japanese Navy built large warships using all-welded Ducol structural elements, which swiftly led to severe problems with the Mogami-class cruisers.[ citation needed ]

Applications

Ships

Ducol has been used for bulkheads in both general construction and against torpedoes, and for light armour in warships of several countries, including the British, Japanese and perhaps Italian navies. [11] After WW2 the highest grades of the commercial shipbuilding steels were based on this type of steel. [12]

Royal Navy

Rodney bombarding German positions along the Caen coast, 7 June 1944 HMS Rodney in support of the Normandy landings.jpg
Rodney bombarding German positions along the Caen coast, 7 June 1944

Ducol steel was used in HMS Nelson and HMS Rodney (1927) to save weight. [13]

It was used in British anti-torpedo-system design practice in its last battleships. The internal hull and torpedo bulkheads and internal decks were made of Ducol or "D"-class steel, an extra-strong form of HTS. Much of the load-bearing portions of King George V-class battleships including the weather deck and the bulkheads were made from Ducol [14]

HMS Ark Royal's fully-enclosed armoured hangar and the armoured flight deck which it supported were constructed of Ducol.[ citation needed ]

Other types of armour used on Navy ships:

Imperial Japanese Navy

Hiyo at anchor Japanese aircraft carrier Hiyo.jpg
Hiyō at anchor
Three of the four Mogami-class cruisers of the Seventh Squadron Japanese Cruisers of the Seventh Squadron.jpg
Three of the four Mogami-class cruisers of the Seventh Squadron

The Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) made considerable use of Ducol made under licence by Japan Steel Works in Muroran, Hokkaidō, Japan: the company was set up with investment from Vickers, Armstrong Whitworth and Mitsui. [15]

The Mogami-class cruisers were originally designed with all-welded Ducol bulkheads which were then welded to the ship's hull. The resultant faults caused by electric welding used in the structural portions of the hull resulted in deformation, and the main gun turrets were unable to train properly. They were re-built with riveted construction, and the other two were redesigned. [16] [17] [18]

All of the following ships or classes (the list is not complete) used Ducol in structural bulkheads and protective plating:

  1. Japanese aircraft carrier Kaga (1928)
  2. Japanese cruiser Takao [b] [20]
  3. Mogami-class cruisers (x2, 1931), (x2 1933-34)
  4. Nagato-class battleships x2, (1920, upgraded 1934-36)
  5. Japanese aircraft carrier Shōkaku (1939) [c]
  6. Japanese battleship Yamato (1940) [14] [d]
  7. Japanese battleship Musashi (1940)
  8. Japanese aircraft carrier Hiyō (1941) [24]
  9. Japanese cruiser Oyodo (1941) [25]
  10. Agano-class cruisers x4, (1941–44)
  11. Japanese aircraft carrier Shinano (1944)

In addition, the IJN's '25-ton' type river motor gun boat had an all-welded hull, protected by 4-5mm Ducol steel.

Italian Navy

The Italian Navy used a similar type of steel to Ducol in its Pugliese torpedo defense system. This underwater "bulge" system was introduced in the Italian Littorio-class battleships, and in the completely rebuilt versions of the Italian battleship Duilio and the Conte di Cavour-class battleships. The inboard-facing side consisted of a layer of silicon-manganese high-tensile steel from 28-40mm thick called "Elevata Resistenza" (ER) steel, which was probably somewhat similar to the British Ducol ("D" or "Dl") Steel used for light armour and torpedo bulkheads in WWII. [26]

"However, the power of the torpedoes used during WWII rapidly outclassed even the best bulge protection systems and the magnetic pistol, when finally perfected, allowed the torpedo to completely bypass the bulge by detonating under the keel of the ship." [26]

Tanks

During WWII many Soviet tanks used Ducol type steel due to a lack of chromium and nickel. [12]

Bridges

Sumida River

Kiyosu-bashi suspension bridge Kiyosu bashi old.jpg
Kiyosu-bashi suspension bridge

The Eitai-bashi (1926) and Kiyosu-bashi (1928) bridges over the Sumida River in Tokyo seem to have been some of the first bridges to be made with Ducol, at the time a state-of-the-art technology.

The bridges were built by Kawasaki Dockyard Co., to replace earlier crossings which were destroyed in the 1923 Great Kanto earthquake. High-tensile Ducol was used for the lower supports of the Eitai-bashi tied-arch bridge, and for the upper cables of the Kiyosu-bashi self-anchored suspension bridge. The steel was made at Kawasaki's Hyogo Works, Kobe. [27]

"The Ducol steel was used as the material in cases of the construction of the Eitai bashi and the Kiyosu bashi. The author is not aware if the material has been previously used for a bridge.
The material investigated by the author has the C content of 0.24-0.30% and Mn of 1.4-1.6% giving a tensile strength 63-71kg/mm2, elongation 20-23% in 200mm gauge and elastic limit 42kg/mm2.
The Ducol steel seems to be preferable as the bridge building material both in quality and in the cost compared with others such as Ni steel, Si steel and C steel." [5]

Chelsea Bridge

Chelsea Bridge from below Chelsea Bridge from below.JPG
Chelsea Bridge from below

Ducol was also used in the construction of the stiffening girders of Chelsea Bridge (1934-1937) joined by HTS rivets. A small amount of copper was added to the mix to improve corrosion resistance. [7]

Glen Quoich Road Bridge

Used in the construction of the Glen Quoich Road Bridge, Aberdeenshire - built 1955 by Sir William Arrol & Co. crossing the Qoich Water between Mar Lodge and Allanaquoich, not far from where it joins the River Dee. [28] [29] [30]

Pressure vessels

SR 850 Lord Nelson, restored SR 850 Lord Nelson.jpg
SR 850 Lord Nelson, restored

Ducol has been used in pressure vessels including steam boilers and solid wall ammonia converter shells as used in the Haber–Bosch process. Normalised and tempered Ducol W30 has been used in heavy walled nuclear reactors. [31]

In the UK, the British Standard for low alloy steels used for high temperature pressure purposes is BS EN 10028-2:2006. It replaced the old BS1501 Part 2: 1988. [32]

Steam locomotives

The boiler plates for the Southern Railway 4-6-0 Lord Nelson class locomotives, designed by Richard Maunsell in 1926 to work at 250 psi (1,700 kPa), were made of Ducol. [33]

Incidents

A number of pressure vessels & boilers constructed with Ducol (or similar materials) have failed. Such failures have all been because of faulty fabrication or testing of the vessel, rather than the steel itself. [34]

Sizewell 'A'

Sizewell 'A' nuclear power station Sizewell A.jpg
Sizewell 'A' nuclear power station

Ducol was used in the boiler shells at Sizewell ‘A’ nuclear reactor. [35] [36]

Failure of Sizewell ‘A’ boiler under hydrostatic test, May 1963. "The boiler was 18.9 m long, 6.9 m diameter, and was fabricated from plates 57 mm thick in a low alloy steel, conforming to BW87A specification (similar to Ducol W30, but with lower C), of composition 0.1C, 1.4Mn, 0.5Cr, 0.25Mo, 0.2Ni, 0.1 V. The cause of the failure was attributed to a shock impact loading, when the wooden chocks on which the vessel was resting during the hydro-test suddenly gave way." [37]

Ducol would have been used for the later stations, but was superseded by prestressed concrete pressure vessels (PCPV). [38] The advantage of prestressed concrete is that once the initial compression has been applied, the resulting material has the characteristics of high-strength concrete when subject to any subsequent compression forces, and of ductile high-strength steel when subject to tension forces. [39]

John Thompson pressure vessel

In December 1965 a boiler made of Ducol was under construction by John Thompson, Wolverhampton, for ICI's ammonia plant at Fisons' Immingham works. It was being pressure-tested after heat treatment when it exploded, throwing one chunk weighing 2 tons right through the workshop wall and landing 50 metres away. [40] [41]

In Ducol W30, embrittlement of the heat-affected zone (HAZ) in welds occurs unless post-weld heat treatment takes place at a sufficient temperature (675C). [10] The amount of pre-heating and the type of welding consumables (eg low hydrogen) can affect hydrogen embrittlement (or cracking) in the weld. [42]

Cockenzie power station

Cockenzie Power Station Cockenzie Power Station, East Lothian.JPG
Cockenzie Power Station

A boiler drum made with Ducol plates, manufactured by Babcock & Wilcox Ltd (now Altrad Babcock) at Renfrew, near Glasgow, to BS 1113 (1958) was installed at Cockenzie Power Station in East Lothian, Scotland. It exploded on 6 May 1967 under repeated pressure testing. According to Jim Thomson, the failure was caused by a crack (created during the original manufacturing process) which occurred next to an economiser nozzle replaced during testing; the crack had penetrated part-way through the thick wall of the pressure vessel. [43]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Mogami</i>-class cruiser Class of Japanese heavy cruisers

The Mogami class (最上型) was a ship class of four cruisers built for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) during the 1930s. They were initially classified as light cruisers under the weight and armament restrictions of the London Naval Treaty. After Japan abrogated that agreement, all four ships were rearmed with larger guns and reclassified as heavy cruisers. All participated in World War II and were sunk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yokosuka Naval Arsenal</span> Japanese shipyard

Yokosuka Naval Arsenal was one of four principal naval shipyards owned and operated by the Imperial Japanese Navy, and was located at Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture on Tokyo Bay, south of Yokohama.

Japanese cruiser <i>Ōyodo</i> Imperial Japanese Navys light cruiser

Ōyodo (大淀) was a light cruiser built for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) during World War II, and was the only ship of her class completed before the end of the war. Designed to command submarine operations, she was obsolete upon completion in 1943. The ship was used as a transport and to escort the navy's capital ships for the rest of the year. Ōyodo was lightly damaged by American aircraft in early January 1944 during one transport mission and returned home several months later to begin conversion to serve as the flagship of the Combined Fleet.

Japanese cruiser <i>Yahagi</i> (1942) Agano-class cruiser

Yahagi (矢矧) was an Agano-class cruiser which served with the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) during World War II.

Japanese cruiser <i>Hashidate</i>

Hashidate was the third in the Matsushima class of protected cruisers in the Imperial Japanese Navy. The ship was the only one of the class constructed in Japan. Like sister ships, her name comes from one of the traditional Three Views of Japan, in this case, the Ama-no-hashidate in northern Kyoto prefecture on the Sea of Japan.

Japanese ironclad <i>Kongō</i> Kongō-class ironclad corvette

Kongō was the lead ship of the Kongō-class ironclad corvettes built for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) in the 1870s. The class was built in the United Kingdom because such ships could not yet be constructed in Japan. Completed in 1878, Kongō briefly served with the Small Standing Fleet before becoming a training ship in 1887, thereafter making training cruises to the Mediterranean and to countries on the edge of the Pacific Ocean. The ship returned to active duty during the First Sino-Japanese War of 1894–95 where she participated in the Battle of Weihaiwei. Kongō resumed her training duties after the war, though she also played a minor role in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–05. The ship was reclassified as a survey ship in 1906 and was sold for scrap in 1910.

Japanese cruiser <i>Mogami</i> (1934) Lead ship of the Mogami-class of cruisers

Mogami (最上) was the lead ship in the four-vessel Mogami class of heavy cruisers in the Imperial Japanese Navy. She was named after the Mogami River in Tōhoku region of Japan. The Mogami-class ships were constructed as "light cruisers" with five triple 155-millimetre (6.1 in) dual purpose guns. They were exceptionally large for light cruisers, and the barbettes for the main battery were designed for quick refitting with twin 8-inch (203 mm) guns. In 1937 all four ships were "converted" to heavy cruisers in this fashion. Mogami served in numerous combat engagements in World War II, until she was sunk at the Battle of Leyte Gulf in October 1944.

French cruiser <i>Algérie</i> French WW II-era heavy cruiser

Algérie was the last treaty cruiser constructed for the French Navy. Designed and built in response to the Italian's Zara class of 8-inch gun cruisers, she was a totally new design and not based on the previous ships. The armoured caisson system used in Foch and Dupleix was abandoned in favour of a full armoured belt enclosing both the magazines and machinery spaces. She abandoned the unit propulsion system used previously and grouped her boilers forward leading to the reduction to a single funnel. She was one of the first vessels to utilize super heating boilers. Welding was used primarily in place of the normal rivetting in previous vessels. She maintained the same main armament but her secondary guns were increased to 100 mm guns. She served in the Mediterranean Sea after entering service then searched for German surface raiders at the beginning of the war. She was at Toulon, France, at the time of the Armistice and remained there until scuttled in November 1942.

Japanese cruiser <i>Suzuya</i> (1934) Third ship in the Mogami class of Japanese heavy cruisers

Suzuya (鈴谷) was the third of four vessels in the Mogami class of heavy cruisers in the Imperial Japanese Navy. She was named after the Suzuya River on Karafuto.

The two Tone-class cruisers were the last heavy cruisers completed for the Imperial Japanese Navy. The Tone-class cruisers were originally envisaged as the 5th and 6th vessels in the Mogami class. However, by the time construction began, serious weaknesses in the Mogami-class hull design had become clear following the Fourth Fleet incident in 1935. As Japan no longer was obligated to abide by the limitations of the London Naval Treaty, a new design was created and new means of construction were utilized. Although the external dimensions were close to the Mogami class, the design was quite different, with all the main battery of guns placed forward of the bridge, reserving the entire stern area as a large seaplane operations deck. Unlike the U.S. Navy, the Japanese did not have a dual role attack/scout aircraft, nor did they assign any of their carrier aircraft to a reconnaissance role. Little emphasis was placed on this aspect of carrier warfare. Instead the Japanese reserved all of their carrier aircraft for attack roles. Reconnaissance then was relegated to the float planes carried by cruisers. The Tone and the Chikuma were intended to provide the long range reconnaissance needed for Japan's carrier Air Fleets.

<i>Tenryū</i>-class cruiser Class of Imperial Japanese Navy light cruisers

The two Tenryū-class cruisers were the first light cruisers operated by the Imperial Japanese Navy. They participated in numerous actions during World War II.

<i>Tosa</i>-class battleship Class of Japanese dreadnoughts that did not see service as battleships

The Tosa-class battleships were two dreadnoughts ordered as part of the "Eight-Eight" fleet for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) during the early 1920s. The ships were larger versions of the preceding Nagato class, and carried an additional 41-centimeter (16.1 in) twin-gun turret. The design for the class served as a basis for the Amagi-class battlecruisers.

<i>Shōkaku</i>-class aircraft carrier Aircraft carrier class of the Imperial Japanese Navy

The Shōkaku class consisted of two aircraft carriers built for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) in the late 1930s. Completed shortly before the start of the Pacific War in 1941, the Shōkaku and Zuikaku were called "arguably the best aircraft carriers in the world" when built. With the exception of the Battle of Midway, they participated in every major naval action of the Pacific War, including the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Indian Ocean Raid, the Battle of the Coral Sea, the Guadalcanal Campaign, the Battle of the Philippine Sea and the Battle of Leyte Gulf.

<i>Shiratsuyu</i>-class destroyer Class of destroyers of the Imperial Japanese Navy

The Shiratsuyu-class destroyers were a class of ten 1st Class destroyers of the Imperial Japanese Navy in service before and during World War II, during which all ten were sunk.

<i>Hatsuharu</i>-class destroyer Ship class

The Hatsuharu-class destroyers were a class of Imperial Japanese Navy destroyers in the service before and during World War II. The final two vessels in the class, completed after modifications to the design, are sometimes considered a separate "Ariake class".

<i>Nagato</i>-class battleship Class of Japanese battleships

The Nagato-class battleships were a pair of dreadnought battleships built for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) towards the end of World War I, although they were not completed until after the war. The last of Japan's pre-Treaty capital ships, they were the first class to carry 41 cm (16.1 in) guns, the largest afloat at the time and the first bigger than 15 inches (381 mm). Nagato, the lead ship of the class, frequently served as a flagship. Both ships carried supplies for the survivors of the Great Kantō earthquake in 1923. They were modernized in 1933–1936 with improvements to their armor and machinery and a rebuilt superstructure in the pagoda mast style. Nagato and her sister ship Mutsu briefly participated in the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937 and Nagato was the flagship of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto during the attack on Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941 that began the Pacific War.

<i>Fuji</i>-class battleship Imperial Japanese Navy ship class

The Fuji class was a two-ship class of pre-dreadnought battleships built for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) in the mid-1890s. They were the first battleships in the IJN, and were constructed in the UK as Japan lacked the industrial facilities needed to build them. Their design was based on the battleships being built for the Royal Navy at that time.

<i>Tsukuba</i>-class cruiser Japanese class of cruisers

The Tsukuba-class cruisers were a pair of large armored cruisers built for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) in the first decade of the 20th century. Construction began during the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–05 and their design was influenced by the IJN's experiences during the war. The British development of the battlecruiser the year after Tsukuba was completed made her and her sister ship Ikoma obsolete, as they were slower and more weakly armed than the British, and later German, ships. Despite this, they were reclassified in 1912 as battlecruisers by the IJN.

Japanese battleship <i>Tosa</i> Planned battleship of the Imperial Japanese Navy

Tosa (土佐) was a planned battleship of the Imperial Japanese Navy. Designed by Yuzuru Hiraga, Tosa was to be the first of two Tosa-class ships. Displacing 39,900-long-ton (40,540 t) and armed with ten 410 mm (16.1 in) guns, these warships would have brought Japan closer to its goal of an "Eight-four" fleet. All work on the ship was halted after the Washington Naval Conference and the signing of the Washington Naval Treaty. As the vessel had to be destroyed in accordance with the terms of the treaty, it was subjected to various tests to gauge the effectiveness of Japanese weaponry before being scuttled on 9 February 1925.

Naval armor refers to the various protections schemes employed by warships. The first ironclad warship was created in 1859, and the pace of armour advancement accelerated quickly thereafter. The emergence of battleships around the turn of the 20th century saw ships become increasingly large and well armoured. Vast quantities of heavily armoured ships were used during the World Wars, and were crucial in the outcome. The emergence of guided missiles in the last part of the 20th century has greatly reduced the utility of armor, and most modern warships are now only lightly armored.

References

Notes
  1. Colville & Sons supplied, for example, the structural steel for the rebuilding of the Bank of England (1925-39). [1] [2]
  2. Japanese heavy cruiser Takao, along with Japanese battleship Nagato and the aircraft carrier Kaga and subsequent designs used torpedo bulges - inner curves formed by bulkheads made up of two 29mm plates providing 58mm of protetction. Also on Takao, Ducol was used on the conning tower (middle bridge deck). Torpedo warheads were also protected by a Ducol steel casing. [19]
  3. "As already noted, in comparison with the preceding Hiryu, Shōkaku's armor protection was considerably improved. 25mm Ducol Steel (DS) steel plates protected her magazines and 132mm New Vickers non-cemented (NVNC) deck. Belt armor consisted of 16mm NVNC plates." [21]
    Lengerer differs considerably as to what was made of Ducol, perhaps because of the extensive refit in 1934-36? "The lower strake of the armor was backed by 50 millimeters (2.0 in) of Ducol steel. The magazines were protected by 165 millimeters (6.5 in) of New Vickers Non-Cemented (NVNC) armor, sloped at an inclination up to 25° and tapered to thicknesses of 55–75 millimeters (2.2–3.0 in). The flight and both hangar decks were unprotected and the ships' propulsion machinery was protected by a 65-millimeter (2.6 in) deck of CNC armor.
    The Shōkakus were the first Japanese carriers to incorporate a torpedo belt system. The torpedo bulkhead itself consisted of an outer Ducol plate 18–30 millimeters (0.71–1.18 in) thick that was riveted to a 12-millimeter (0.47 in) plate." [22]
  4. The main portion of the central longitudinal structure was made with Ducol - rivetted, not welded, after problems with the Mogami-class cruisers. Also given 9mm deck plating. [23]
Citations
  1. "Photographic records of steel framed buildings constructed by David Colville and Sons Limited, 1920-1951". Jisc Archives Hub. Retrieved 14 July 2019.
  2. Good photo at "Our History". Bank of England. Retrieved 14 July 2019.
  3. Okun, Nathan (2006). "Ask InfoSer". Warship International. 43 (1). International Naval Research Organization: 34. JSTOR   44895756.
  4. Lacroix 1977, p. 351 n20.
  5. 1 2 3 Taniyama 1929, p. 268.
  6. Lacroix 1981, p. 75 n56.
  7. 1 2 Kerensky 1949, pp. 278–9.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Frick 2000, p. 364.
  9. Knott 2014.
  10. 1 2 Allen, Smith & Apps 1970, p. ii, 9, 10.
  11. Okun, Nathan. "Armor Profection of the Battleship KM Bismarck" . Retrieved 14 August 2019.
  12. 1 2 Okun, Nathan. "Table of Metallurgical Properties of Naval Armor and Construction Materials: Average Post-WWI Extra-High-Strength "D" Silicon-Manganese HT Steels" . Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  13. Jordan 2011, p. 95.
  14. 1 2 Okun, Nathan. "Armor protection of the battleship KM Bismarck" . Retrieved 15 August 2019.
  15. "JSW Corporate Guide" (PDF). JSW: The Japan Steel Works, Ltd. October 2018. p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 November 2011. Retrieved 15 August 2019.
  16. Caruana 1966, p. 58.
  17. Lacroix 1981a, pp. 323–367.
  18. Lacroix 1984, pp. 246–305.
  19. Skulski 2004, p. 19.
  20. Lacroix 1983, pp. 232–282.
  21. Parry, Allan (ed.). "Warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, Vol. 6 - Shokaku class, Soyru, Hiro, Unryu class, Taiho" (PDF). CombinedFleet.com. English Translation of Kojinsha Photo File. Retrieved 15 August 2019.
  22. Lengerer 2015, pp. 100–101, 102–106, 107–9.
  23. Skulski 2017, pp. 12–13.
  24. Lengerer & Rehm-Takahara 1985, pp. 9–19, 105–114, 188–193.
  25. Lengerer 2018, pp. 102, 104, 198.
  26. 1 2 Okun, Nathan (1978). Scheidel Jr., Charles W. (ed.). "Ask Infoser". Warship International. 15 (1). International Naval Research Organization: 67–82. JSTOR   44890131.Plus good info on p. 72 about the names of the British WWI monitors inc. HMS Marshal Ney & HMS Marshal Soult.
  27. "History of Kawasaki: 1910-1949". Kawasaki. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  28. McDonald, Miriam (1998). "Sir William Arrol Collection" (PDF). Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland. p. 25.
  29. "Item 3: Letter to Messrs. Colvilles Ltd., re photograph showing the use of DUCOL steel as used on Glen Quoich Road Bridge". Canmore: Register for the Historic Environment. Retrieved 15 August 2019.
  30. Pix at: "Glen Quoich, Bridge". National Record of the Historic Environment. Retrieved 15 August 2019.
  31. McKetta 1992, pp. 217–8.
  32. "What are the Key EN Steel Standards?". Oakley Steel. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  33. "Southern Railway Locomotive Drawings Composite List" (PDF). National Railway Museum. p. [98]. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  34. Lancaster 1997, p. 392.
  35. Thorn, J. D., ed. (15 January 1963). The Civil H.T.R Reference Design Study. Project Dragon. U.S. Department of Energy: Office of Scientific and Technical Information. pp. 13, 25.
  36. Price, M. S. T. "The Dragon Project origins, achievements and legacies (abstract)". IAEA International Nuclear Information System. Retrieved 17 July 2019.
  37. Knott 2014, pp. 319–354.
  38. Stuart 2013, p. 337.
  39. Warner, R. F.; Faulkes, K. A. (1988). "Prestressed Concrete" (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire. pp. 1–13. ISBN   0582712254.
  40. "John Thompson pressure vessel". The Welding Institute (TWI). Retrieved 15 August 2019.
  41. Weck, R. (June 1966). "Brittle Fracture of a Thick Walled Pressure Vessel". British Welding Research Association Bulletin. 7 (6).
  42. Bailey, N. (April 1972). "The Establishment of Safe Welding Procedures for Steels" (PDF). Welding Research: Supplement to the Welding Journal. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  43. Thomson, Jim (2013). "The Cockenzie Steam Drum Failure, 1966" (PDF). Learning from Ignorance – Pressure Vessel Failures since the 19th Century. Safety In Engineering Ltd. pp. 13–16.

Sources