Hydrogen embrittlement

Last updated
Hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC) Steel-with-Hydrogen-Induced-Cracks-01.jpg
Hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC)

Hydrogen embrittlement (HE), also known as hydrogen-assisted cracking or hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC), is a reduction in the ductility of a metal due to absorbed hydrogen. Hydrogen atoms are small and can permeate solid metals. Once absorbed, hydrogen lowers the stress required for cracks in the metal to initiate and propagate, resulting in embrittlement. Hydrogen embrittlement occurs in steels, as well as in iron, nickel, titanium, cobalt, and their alloys. Copper, aluminium, and stainless steels are generally less susceptible. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

The essential facts about the nature of hydrogen embrittlement have been known since the 19th century. [4] [5] Hydrogen embrittlement is maximised at around room temperature in steels, and most metals are relatively immune to hydrogen embrittlement at temperatures above 150 °C. [6] Hydrogen embrittlement requires the presence of both atomic ("diffusible") hydrogen and a mechanical stress to induce crack growth, although that stress may be applied or residual. [2] [7] Hydrogen embrittlement increases at lower strain rates. [1] [2] [8] In general, higher-strength steels are more susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement than mid-strength steels. [9]

Metals can be exposed to hydrogen from two types of sources: gaseous dihydrogen and atomic hydrogen chemically generated at the metal surface. Atomic hydrogen dissolves quickly into the metal at room temperature and leads to embrittlement. [5] Gaseous dihydrogen is found in pressure vessels and pipelines. Electrochemical sources of hydrogen include acids (as may be encountered during pickling, etching, or cleaning), corrosion (typically due to aqueous corrosion or cathodic protection), and electroplating. [1] [2] Hydrogen can also be introduced during manufacturing by the presence of moisture during welding or while the metal is molten. The most common causes of failure in practice are poorly controlled electroplating or damp welding rods.

Hydrogen embrittlement as a term can be used either specifically for embrittlement in steels and similar metals at relatively low hydrogen concentrations, or more broadly to encompass all embrittling effects that hydrogen has on metals. These broader effects include hydride formation, which occurs in titanium and vanadium but not in steels, and hydrogen-induced blistering, which generally occurs at high hydrogen concentrations and does not require the presence of stress. [8] However, hydrogen embrittlement is usually distinguished from high temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA), which occurs in steels at temperatures above 204 °C and involves the formation of methane pockets. [10] The mechanisms by which hydrogen causes embrittlement in steels are not comprehensively understood and continue to be actively investigated. [1] [11] [12]

Hydrogen-related degradation is also a significant concern in large energy systems, particularly in hydrogen-cooled turbogenerators, where prolonged exposure to hydrogen atmospheres may influence the structural integrity of rotor steels and associated components. [13]

Mechanisms

Crack in a hardened steel due to hydrogen, observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Intergranular Crack SEM Micrograph.jpg
Crack in a hardened steel due to hydrogen, observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Hydrogen embrittlement is a complex process involving a number of distinct contributing micro-mechanisms, not all of which need to be present. It is now widely accepted that hydrogen embrittlement depends on material and environment, with no single mechanism exclusively applicable. [12] The mechanisms include the formation of brittle hydrides, the creation of voids that can lead to high-pressure bubbles, enhanced decohesion at internal surfaces, and localised plasticity at crack tips that assist in the propagation of cracks. [12] A wide variety of mechanisms have been proposed and investigated as causes of brittleness once diffusible hydrogen has dissolved into the metal. [5]

Hydrogen effects in steels

Hydrogen exposure may also influence the mechanical and tribological behaviour of alloyed steels during machining and wear processes. Studies on high-nickel steels have indicated that hydrogen absorption can modify the properties of the surface layer, affect plastic deformation during cutting, and influence the formation of wear products and surface damage under lubricated friction conditions. [18]

Recent diagnostic approaches have therefore focused on identifying hydrogen-induced degradation in rotor steels and developing monitoring methods for damaged regions during maintenance and repair operations of turbo-aggregates. [19]

Nanopore nucleation and hydrogen-assisted crack initiation

Recent studies have shown that hydrogen-assisted degradation processes may involve the nucleation of nanoscale defects and nanopores in structural alloys, which subsequently act as sites for crack initiation and propagation. Experimental investigations of Ni–Co superalloys demonstrated that hydrogen can accelerate nanopore nucleation and promote microcrack formation under mechanical loading. [20]

Hydrogen-assisted damage in metallic materials is often associated with the formation of nanoscale defects that act as precursors to crack initiation. In hydrogen-containing environments, absorbed hydrogen can accumulate at lattice defects, grain boundaries, and dislocation structures, promoting localized plasticity and facilitating the nucleation of nanopores. [13] Similar degradation mechanisms have also been discussed for structural steels operating in hydrogen-rich environments, including hydrogen-cooled turbo-generator systems, where hydrogen diffusion and accumulation may influence the integrity of rotor steels and their resistance to cracking. [19]

Material susceptibility

Hydrogen embrittles a variety of metals including steel, [21] [22] aluminium (at high temperatures only), [23] and titanium. [24] Austempered iron is also susceptible, though austempered steel displays increased resistance to hydrogen embrittlement. [25] NASA has reviewed which metals are susceptible to embrittlement and which are more prone to hot hydrogen attack, including nickel alloys, austenitic stainless steels, aluminium alloys, and copper alloys. [2] Sandia National Laboratories has also produced a comprehensive technical reference. [26]

Steels

Steels embrittled with hydrogen through cathodic charging. Heat treatment (baking) was used to reduce hydrogen content. Lower bake times resulted in quicker fracture times due to higher hydrogen content. </ref> Hydrogen Belittlement.png
Steels embrittled with hydrogen through cathodic charging. Heat treatment (baking) was used to reduce hydrogen content. Lower bake times resulted in quicker fracture times due to higher hydrogen content. </ref>

Steel with an ultimate tensile strength of less than 1000 MPa (~145,000 psi) or hardness below HRC 32 on the Rockwell scale is not generally considered highly susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement. As an example of severe embrittlement, the elongation at failure of 17-4PH precipitation-hardened stainless steel was measured to drop from 17% to only 1.7% when smooth specimens were exposed to high-pressure hydrogen. [2]

As the strength of steels increases, the fracture toughness decreases, so the likelihood that hydrogen embrittlement will lead to fracture increases. In high-strength steels, anything above a hardness of HRC 32 may be susceptible to early hydrogen cracking after plating processes that introduce hydrogen. Such steels may also experience delayed failures from weeks to decades after being placed in service due to the accumulation of hydrogen over time from cathodic protection and other sources. Numerous failures have been reported in the hardness range from HRC 32–36 and above; therefore, parts in this range are often checked during quality control to ensure that they are not susceptible.[ citation needed ]

Testing the fracture toughness of hydrogen-charged, embrittled specimens is complicated by the need to keep charged specimens very cold, for example in liquid nitrogen, to prevent hydrogen diffusion losses during handling. [28]

Surface effects and tribological degradation

Hydrogen can also influence surface degradation processes in metallic materials subjected to friction and contact loading. The presence of absorbed hydrogen may alter tribological behaviour by affecting dislocation mobility, surface plasticity, and crack nucleation in near-surface layers. Experimental studies on structural steels have shown that hydrogen charging combined with mechanical loading can significantly modify tribotechnical properties, including wear resistance and friction behaviour, thereby accelerating surface damage under operational conditions. [29]

Hydrogen may also influence the surface behavior of steels during mechanical processing and tribological contact. In hydrogen-containing environments, absorbed hydrogen can accumulate at lattice defects, dislocations and grain boundaries, altering local plastic deformation mechanisms in the surface layer. Experimental studies have shown that hydrogen may affect chip formation during machining of alloy steels by modifying the stress state in the cutting zone and promoting localized deformation and microcrack nucleation. Such processes can influence the morphology and fragmentation of chips as well as the formation of wear debris during sliding friction. [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35]

Pipeline steels

For pipeline steels such as API 5L X70 and X80, hydrogen uptake and environment-assisted cracking are major integrity concerns; recent reviews synthesize hydrogen behaviour, embrittlement mechanisms, and mitigation strategies specific to line-pipe grades. [9] Under high-pressure gaseous hydrogen, laboratory evaluations on X70 line-pipe steel have shown reductions in fracture toughness and accelerated fatigue-crack growth under blended-hydrogen service conditions. [36] In acidic environments containing H2S, hydrogen-induced cracking and blistering have been reported to correlate with inclusion morphology and sulfur content in pipeline and pressure-vessel steels. [37]

Copper

Copper alloys containing oxygen can be embrittled if exposed to hot hydrogen. Hydrogen diffuses through the copper and reacts with inclusions of Cu
2
O
, forming metallic copper and H2O , which then forms pressurised bubbles of steam at the grain boundaries. This process can force grains apart in a phenomenon often referred to as steam embrittlement.[ citation needed ]

Vanadium, nickel, and titanium

Alloys of vanadium, nickel, and titanium have high hydrogen solubility and can therefore absorb significant amounts of hydrogen. This can lead to hydride formation, resulting in irregular volume expansion and reduced ductility. This is a particular issue in the development of non-palladium-based alloys for hydrogen separation membranes. [17]

Fatigue

While many failures in practice involve delayed or fast fracture, there is experimental evidence that hydrogen also affects the fatigue properties of steels. [38] [14] In general, hydrogen embrittlement has a strong effect on high-stress, low-cycle fatigue, and a much smaller effect on high-cycle fatigue. [2] [26]

Environmental embrittlement

Hydrogen embrittlement is a volume effect: it affects the bulk of the material. Environmental embrittlement is a surface effect where molecules from the surrounding atmosphere are adsorbed onto the newly created crack surface. [2] This is especially evident in fatigue measurements, where crack growth rates can be an order of magnitude higher in hydrogen than in air. [26] Environmental embrittlement is also observed to reduce fracture toughness in fast-fracture tests, although its severity is usually less than that of bulk hydrogen embrittlement. [26]

Hydrogen embrittlement occurs when a previously embrittled material has low fracture toughness regardless of the atmosphere in which it is tested. Environmental embrittlement occurs when the low fracture toughness is only observed in that atmosphere.

Sources of hydrogen

During manufacture, hydrogen can be dissolved into components by processes such as phosphating, pickling, electroplating, casting, surface cleaning, electrochemical machining, welding, hot roll forming, and heat treatment.

During service, hydrogen can enter metals through wet corrosion or through inappropriate use of protection measures such as cathodic protection. [39] In one reported case during the construction of the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, galvanized rods were left wet for several years before being tensioned, and the reaction of zinc with water introduced hydrogen into the steel. [40] [41] [42]

A common case of embrittlement during manufacture is poor arc welding practice, in which hydrogen is released from moisture in welding consumables. [24] [43] To avoid atomic hydrogen formation in the high-temperature plasma of the welding arc, welding rods must be properly dried before use. Another way to minimise the formation of hydrogen is to use special low-hydrogen electrodes for welding high-strength steels.

Apart from arc welding, the most common problems arise from chemical or electrochemical processes which, by reduction of hydrogen ions or water, generate hydrogen atoms at the surface that rapidly dissolve in the metal. One such reaction involves hydrogen sulfide ( H
2
S
) in sulfide stress cracking (SSC), a significant problem for the oil and gas industries. [44]

After a manufacturing process or treatment that may cause hydrogen ingress, the component should often be baked to remove or immobilise the hydrogen. [41]

Prevention

Hydrogen embrittlement can be mitigated through several methods, all centred on minimising contact between the metal and hydrogen, particularly during fabrication and service. Embrittling procedures such as acid pickling should be carefully controlled, as should contact with species such as sulfur and phosphate.

If the metal has not yet started to crack, hydrogen embrittlement can sometimes be reversed by removing the hydrogen source and causing the hydrogen within the metal to diffuse out through heat treatment. This de-embrittlement process, known as low hydrogen annealing or "baking", is commonly used after electroplating, although it is not always fully effective because a sufficient time and temperature must be reached. [45] Tests such as ASTM F1624 can be used to identify the minimum baking time and to verify process adequacy.

In the case of welding, pre-heating and post-heating are often applied to allow hydrogen to diffuse out before it can cause damage. This is especially relevant for high-strength steels and low alloy steels such as chromium/molybdenum/vanadium alloys. Because hydrogen atoms require time to recombine into molecules, hydrogen cracking due to welding may occur more than 24 hours after welding is completed.

Another way of reducing susceptibility is through appropriate materials selection. This can provide inherent resistance and reduce the need for post-processing or constant monitoring. Extensive work has been carried out to catalogue the compatibility of metals with hydrogen environments. [26]

Surface coatings

Coatings act as a barrier between the metal substrate and the surrounding environment, hindering the ingress of hydrogen atoms. Various techniques can be used to apply coatings, such as electroplating, chemical conversion coatings, or organic coatings. The choice of coating depends on the type of metal, the operating environment, and the application requirements.

Electroplating is commonly used to deposit a protective layer onto the metal surface. This process involves immersing the metal substrate in an electrolyte solution containing metal ions. By applying an electric current, the metal ions are reduced and form a metallic coating on the substrate. Electroplating can improve corrosion resistance and reduce susceptibility to hydrogen embrittlement.

Chemical conversion coatings are another effective method for surface protection. These coatings are formed through chemical reactions between the metal substrate and a chemical solution, resulting in a thin, tightly adhering protective layer. Examples include chromate, phosphate, and oxide coatings.

Organic coatings, such as paints or polymer coatings, provide additional protection by forming a physical barrier between the metal surface and the environment.

Thermally sprayed coatings can also help reduce hydrogen ingress because coating materials such as ceramics or cermets may have low hydrogen permeability. [46]

Testing

Most analytical methods for hydrogen embrittlement involve evaluating the effects of internal hydrogen from production and/or external hydrogen from service environments such as cathodic protection. For steels, it is important to test specimens in the laboratory that are at least as hard as the final parts.

There are numerous ASTM standards for testing hydrogen embrittlement:

Other related standards include:

Notable failures from hydrogen embrittlement

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Lynch, S. P. (2011). "Hydrogen embrittlement (HE) phenomena and mechanisms". In Raja, V. S.; Shoji, Tetsuo (eds.). Stress Corrosion Cracking. Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering. Woodhead Publishing. pp. 90–130. ISBN   978-1-84569-673-3.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jewett, R. P.; Walter, R. J.; Chandler, W. T.; Frohmberg, R. P. (1973). "Hydrogen environment embrittlement of metals". NASA Contractor Report: 12717. Bibcode:1973ntrs.rept12717J.
  3. Safety Standard for Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems: Guidelines for Hydrogen System Design, Materials Selection, Operations, Storage, and Transportation (PDF). Washington, DC: Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 1997. p. A-93. NSS 1740.16.
  4. Johnson, William H. (1875). "On some remarkable changes produced in iron and steel by the action of hydrogen and acids". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 23 (156–163): 168–179. doi:10.1098/rspl.1874.0024. JSTOR   113285.
  5. 1 2 3 Bhadeshia, Harry. "Prevention of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Steels" (PDF). Phase Transformations & Complex Properties Research Group, University of Cambridge.
  6. "What is hydrogen embrittlement? – Causes, effects and prevention". TWI – The Welding Institute.
  7. Oriani, R. A. (1978). "Hydrogen Embrittlement of Steels". Annual Review of Materials Science. 8 (1): 327–357. doi:10.1146/annurev.ms.08.080178.001551.
  8. 1 2 Louthan, M. R. (2008). "Hydrogen Embrittlement of Metals: A Primer for the Failure Analyst". Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention. 8 (3): 289–307. doi:10.1007/s11668-008-9133-x.
  9. 1 2 Li, Hanyu; Niu, Ranming; Li, Wei; Lu, Hongzhou; Cairney, Julie; Chen, Yi-Sheng (2022). "Hydrogen in pipeline steels: Recent advances in characterization and embrittlement mitigation". Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 105 104709. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104709.
  10. "What is high temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA) / hot hydrogen attack?". TWI – The Welding Institute.
  11. 1 2 3 Barnoush, Afrooz. "Hydrogen embrittlement revisited by in situ electrochemical nanoindentations" (PDF).
  12. 1 2 3 Robertson, Ian M.; Sofronis, P.; Nagao, A.; Martin, M. L.; Wang, S.; Gross, D. W.; Nygren, K. E. (2015). "Hydrogen Embrittlement Understood". Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 46 (6): 2323–2341. doi:10.1007/s11661-015-2836-1.
  13. 1 2 Balitskii, A. I.; Syrotyuk, A. M.; Havrilyuk, M. R.; Balitska, V. O.; Kolesnikov, V. O.; Ivaskevych, L. M. (2023). "Hydrogen Cooling of Turbo Aggregates and the Problem of Rotor Shafts Materials Degradation Evaluation". Energies. 16 (23): 7851. doi:10.3390/en16237851.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  14. 1 2 Vergani, Laura; Colombo, Chiara; et al. (2014). "Hydrogen effect on fatigue behavior of a quenched and tempered steel". Procedia Engineering. 74: 468–471. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.299.
  15. Yu, Haiyang (2019). "Discrete dislocation plasticity HELPs understand hydrogen effects in bcc materials". Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 123: 41–60. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.020.
  16. Song, Jun; Curtin, W. A. (2013). "Atomic mechanism and prediction of hydrogen embrittlement in iron". Nature Materials. 12 (2): 145–151. doi:10.1038/nmat3479.
  17. 1 2 Dolan, Michael D.; Kochanek, Mark A.; Munnings, Christopher N.; McLennan, Keith G.; Viano, David M. (2015). "Hydride phase equilibria in V–Ti–Ni alloy membranes". Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 622: 276–281. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.081.
  18. Balitskii, O. A.; Kolesnikov, V. O.; Balitskii, A. I.; Eliasz, J.; Havrilyuk, M. R. (2020). "Hydrogen Effect on the High-Nickel Surface Steel Properties during Machining and Wear with Lubricants". Archives of Materials Science and Engineering. 104 (2): 49–57. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0014.4894.
  19. 1 2 Balitskii, A. I.; Kolesnikov, V. O.; Havrilyuk, M. R.; Balitska, V. O.; Ripey, I. V.; Królkowski, M. A.; Pudlo, T. K. (2025). "Steel Hydrogen-Induced Degradation Diagnostics for Turbo Aggregated Rotor Shaft Repair Technologies". Energies. 18: 4368. doi:10.3390/en18164368.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  20. Balitskii, A. I.; Syrotyuk, A. M.; Ivaskevych, L. M.; Balitskii, O. A.; Kochmanski, P.; Kolesnikov, V. O. (2024). "Hydrogen accelerated nanopore nucleation, crack initiation and propagation in the Ni–Co superalloys". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 82: 320–332. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.390.
  21. Djukic, M. B.; et al. (2014). "Hydrogen embrittlement of low carbon structural steel". Procedia Materials Science. 3: 1167–1172. doi:10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.190.
  22. Djukic, M. B.; et al. (2015). "Hydrogen damage of steels: A case study and hydrogen embrittlement model". Engineering Failure Analysis. 58: 485–498. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.017.
  23. Ambat, Rajan; Dwarakadasa, E. S. (1996). "Effect of Hydrogen in aluminium and aluminium alloys: A review". Bulletin of Materials Science. 19 (1): 103–114. doi:10.1007/BF02744792.
  24. 1 2 Eberhart, Mark (2003). Why Things Break. New York: Harmony Books. p. 65. ISBN   978-1-4000-4760-4.
  25. Tartaglia, John; Lazzari, Kristen; et al. (2008). "A Comparison of Mechanical Properties and Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance of Austempered vs Quenched and Tempered 4340 Steel". Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 39 (3): 559–576. doi:10.1007/s11661-007-9451-8.
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 Marchi, C. San (2012). Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials (PDF) (Report). Sandia National Laboratories.
  27. Morlet, J. G. (1958). "A new concept in hydrogen embrittlement in steels". The Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute. 189: 37.
  28. "Fracture Mechanics Techniques for Assessing the Effects of Hydrogen on Steel Properties".
  29. Balitskii, O. I.; Kolesnikov, V. O.; Ivaskevych, L. M.; Havrilyuk, M. R. (2023). "The Influence of Specific Features of Load and Hydrogen Charging on Steel Tribotechnical Properties". Materials Science. 58 (4): 502–512. doi:10.1007/s11003-023-00691-5.
  30. Bhushan, Bharat (2013). Introduction to Tribology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   9781119944539.
  31. Zum Gahr, K.-H. (1987). Microstructure and Wear of Materials. Elsevier. ISBN   9780444427540.
  32. Birnbaum, H. K.; Sofronis, P. (1994). "Hydrogen-enhanced localized plasticity—A mechanism for hydrogen-related fracture". Materials Science and Engineering A. 176 (1–2): 191–202. doi:10.1016/0921-5093(94)90975-X.
  33. Balitskii, O. A.; Kolesnikov, V. O.; Balitskii, A. I.; Eliasz, J.; Havrilyuk, M. R. (2020). "Hydrogen effect on the high-nickel surface steel properties during machining and wear with lubricants". Archives of Materials Science and Engineering. 104 (2): 49–57. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0014.4894.
  34. Kolesnikov, V. (2025). "The Influence of Microstructure Parameters on the Formation of Cutting Products during Machining of Parts from Steels 38KhN3MFA Taking into Account the Influence of Hydrogen". Advanced and Novel Technologies—Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Materials Science. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Cham: Springer. pp. 77–88. doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00373-7_7.
  35. Balitskii, O.; Kolesnikov, V. (2023). "Steel hydrogen-induced degradation diagnostics and modern technologies for damaged rotor repair". Energies. 16 (10): 3924. doi:10.3390/en16103924.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  36. Martin, May L.; Connolly, Matthew; Buck, Zachary N.; Bradley, Peter E.; Lauria, Damian; Slifka, Andrew J. (2022). "Evaluating a natural gas pipeline steel for blended hydrogen service". Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 101 104529. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104529.
  37. Domizzi, G.; Anteri, G.; Ovejero-García, J. (2001). "Influence of sulphur content and inclusion distribution on the hydrogen induced blister cracking in pressure vessel and pipeline steels". Corrosion Science. 43 (2): 325–339. doi:10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00084-6.
  38. Fernandez-Sousa, Rebeca (2020). "Analysis of the influence of microstructural traps on hydrogen assisted fatigue". Acta Materialia. 199: 253–267. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.030.
  39. Lee, Jonathan A. (2016). "Hydrogen Embrittlement" (PDF). NASA.
  40. 1 2 Francis, Rob (2018). "A Failure Analysis of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Bridge Fasteners". Corrosionpedia.
  41. 1 2 Ferraz, M. Teresa; Oliveira, Manuela (2008). "Steel fasteners failure by hydrogen embrittlement" (PDF). Ciência e Tecnologia dos Materiais. 20 (1/2): 128–133.
  42. 1 2 Chung, Yun (2014). "Validity of Caltrans' Environmental Hydrogen Embrittlement Test on Grade BD Anchor Rods in the SAS Span" (PDF).
  43. Weman, Klas (2011). Welding Processes Handbook. Elsevier. p. 115. ISBN   978-0-85709-518-3.
  44. 1 2 "ASTM F1940 – Standard Test Method for Process Control Verification to Prevent Hydrogen Embrittlement in Plated or Coated Fasteners".
  45. "Embrittlement" (PDF). Fastenal Company Engineering Department.
  46. "Addressing hydrogen permeation and embrittlement". Zircotec. 2023.
  47. "ASTM F1459 – Standard Test Method for Determination of the Susceptibility of Metallic Materials to Hydrogen Gas Embrittlement (HGE) Test".
  48. "ASTM G142 – Standard Test Method for Determination of Susceptibility of Metals to Embrittlement in Hydrogen Containing Environments at High Pressure, High Temperature, or Both".
  49. Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing. ASTM International. 1974. ISBN   978-0-8031-0373-3.
  50. Raymond, L. (1974). Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing. ASTM International. ISBN   978-0-8031-0373-3.
  51. Mair, Lucy (2015). "British Land to replace 'a number of bolts' on Leadenhall Building". Construction News.
  52. "Cheesegrater bolts to cost Severfield £6m after Leadenhall building loses five". City A.M. 2015.