Executive Order 14110

Last updated
Executive Order 14110
Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence
Seal of the President of the United States.svg
Type Executive order
Executive Order number14110
Signed by Joe Biden on October 30, 2023
Federal Register details
Federal Register document number 2023-24283
Summary
Creates a national approach to governing artificial intelligence. [1]

Executive Order 14110, titled Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (sometimes referred to as "Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence" [2] [3] ) is the 126th executive order signed by U.S. President Joe Biden. Signed on October 30, 2023, the order defines the administration's policy goals regarding artificial intelligence (AI), and orders executive agencies to take actions pursuant to these goals. The order is considered to be the most comprehensive piece of governance by the United States regarding AI. [4] [5]

Contents

Policy goals outlined in the executive order pertain to promoting competition in the AI industry, preventing AI-enabled threats to civil liberties and national security, and ensuring U.S. global competitiveness in the AI field. [6] The executive order requires a number of major federal agencies to create dedicated "chief artificial intelligence officer" (chief AI officer) positions within their organizations. [7]

Background

The drafting of the order was motivated by the rapid pace of development in generative AI models in the 2020s, including the release of large language model ChatGPT. [8] Executive Order 14110 is the third executive order dealing explicitly with AI, with two AI-related executive orders being signed by then-President Donald Trump. [9] [10]

The development of AI models without policy safeguards has raised a variety of concerns among experts and commentators. These range from future existential risk from advanced AI models to immediate concerns surrounding current technologies' ability to disseminate misinformation, enable discrimination, and undermine national security. [11]

In August 2023, Arati Prabhakar, the director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, indicated that the White House was expediting its work on executive action on AI. [12] A week prior to the executive order's unveiling, Prabhakar indicated that Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance on the order would be released "soon" after. [13]

Policy goals and provisions

White House graphic listing the provisions of the executive order WH-AI.jpg
White House graphic listing the provisions of the executive order

The order has been characterized as an effort for the United States to capture potential benefits from AI while mitigating risks associated with AI technologies. [14] Upon signing the order, Biden stated that AI technologies were being developed at "warp speed", and argued that to "realize the promise of AI and avoid the risk, we need to govern this technology". [15]

Policy goals outlined by the order include the following: [6]

Impact on agencies

Creation of chief AI officer positions

The executive order requires a number of large federal agencies to appoint a chief artificial intelligence officer, with a number of departments having already appointed a relevant officer prior to the order. In the days following the order, news publication FedScoop confirmed that the General Services Administration (GSA) and the United States Department of Education appointed relevant chief AI officers. The National Science Foundation (NSF) also confirmed it had elevated an official to serve as its chief AI officer. [7]

Department responsibilities

Under the executive order, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will be responsible for developing AI-related security guidelines, including cybersecurity-related matters. The DHS will also work with private sector firms in sectors including the energy industry and other "critical infrastructure" to coordinate responses to AI-enabled security threats. [16] Executive Order 14110 mandated the Department of Veterans Affairs to launch an AI technology competition aimed at reducing occupational burnout among healthcare workers through AI-assisted tools for routine tasks. [17]

The order also mandates the Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop a generative artificial intelligence-focused resource to supplement the existing AI Risk Management Framework. [18]

Analysis

President Biden visiting a meeting held by Vice President Kamala Harris alongside CEOs of AI companies on May 4, 2023 President Joe Biden drops by a meeting with Vice President Kamala Harris and AI CEO's on May 4, 2023 in the Roosevelt Room of the White House - P20230504AS-0693.jpg
President Biden visiting a meeting held by Vice President Kamala Harris alongside CEOs of AI companies on May 4, 2023

The executive order has been described as most comprehensive piece of governance by the United States government pertaining to AI. [4] [5] Earlier in 2023 prior to the signing of the order, the Biden administration had announced a Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, and had secured non-binding AI safety commitments from major tech companies. The issuing of the executive order comes at a time in which lawmakers including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer have pushed for legislation to regulate AI in the 118th United States Congress. [19]

According to Axios, despite the wide scope of the executive order, it notably does not touch upon a number of AI-related policy proposals. This includes proposals for a "licensing regime" to government advanced AI models, which has received support from industry leaders including Sam Altman. Additionally, the executive order does not seek to prohibit 'high-risk' uses of AI technology, and does not aim to mandate that tech companies release information surrounding AI systems' training data and models. [20]

Reception

Political and media reception

The editorial board of the Houston Chronicle described the order as a "first step toward protecting humanity". [21] The issuing of the order received praise from Democratic members of Congress, including Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Representative Ted Lieu (D-CA). [22] Representative Don Beyer (D-VA), who leads the House AI Caucus, praised the order as a "comprehensive strategy for responsible innovation", while arguing that Congress must take initiative to pass legislation on AI. [19]

The draft of the order received criticism from Republican Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), who described it as creating "barriers to innovation disguised as safety measures". [23]

Public reception

Polling from the AI Policy Institute showed that 69% of all voters support the executive order, while 15% oppose it. Breaking it down by party, support was at 78% for democrats, 65% for independents, and 64% for Republicans. [24] [25]

Industry reception

The executive order received strong criticism from the Chamber of Commerce as well as tech industry groups including NetChoice and the Software and Information Industry Association, all of which count "Big Tech" companies Amazon, Meta, and Google as members. Representatives from the organizations argued that the executive order threatens to hinder private sector innovation. [26]

Civil society reception

According to CNBC , a number of leaders of advocacy organizations praised the executive order for its provisions on "AI fairness", while simultaneously urging congressional action to strengthen regulation. Maya Wiley, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, praised the order while urging Congress to take initiative to "ensure that innovation makes us more fair, just, and prosperous, rather than surveilled, silenced, and stereotyped". A representative from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) praised provisions of the order centered on combating AI-enabled discrimination, while also voiced concern over sections of the order focused on law enforcement and national security. [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eric Schmidt</span> American businessman and software engineer (born 1955)

Eric Emerson Schmidt is an American businessman and former Computer Engineer who served as the CEO of Google from 2001 to 2011 and as the company's executive chairman from 2011 to 2015. He also served as the executive chairman of parent company Alphabet Inc. from 2015 to 2017, and Technical Advisor at Alphabet from 2017 to 2020. In October 2024, he was 52nd richest according to Bloomberg Billionaires Index with an estimated net worth of US$33.8 billion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Office of Science and Technology Policy</span> Department of the United States government

The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) is a department of the United States government, part of the Executive Office of the President (EOP), established by United States Congress on May 11, 1976, with a broad mandate to advise the President on the effects of science and technology on domestic and international affairs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jason Gaverick Matheny</span> American national security expert

Jason Gaverick Matheny is a United States national security expert serving as president and CEO of the RAND Corporation since July 2022. He was previously a senior appointee in the Biden administration from March 2021 to June 2022. He served as deputy assistant to the president for technology and national security, deputy director for national security in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and coordinator for technology and national security at the White House National Security Council.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SoundHound</span> American music and speech recognition company

SoundHound AI, Inc. is a voice artificial intelligence (AI) company founded in 2005. It is headquartered are in Santa Clara, California. SoundHound provides a voice AI platform that enables businesses to offer customized conversational experiences to consumers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arati Prabhakar</span> American engineer (born 1959)

Arati Prabhakar is an American engineer and public official. Since October 3, 2022, she has served as the 12th director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Science Advisor to the President.

The artificial intelligenceindustry in China is a rapidly developing multi-billion dollar industry. The roots of China's AI development started in the late 1970s following Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms emphasizing science and technology as the country's primary productive force.

The Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) is a think tank dedicated to policy analysis at the intersection of national and international security and emerging technologies, based at Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mila (research institute)</span> Research laboratory in Montreal, Canada

Mila - Quebec AI Institute is a research institute in Montreal, Quebec, focusing mainly on machine learning research. Approximately 1000 students and researchers and 100 faculty members, were part of Mila in 2022. Along with Alberta's Amii and Toronto's Vector Institute, Mila is part of the Pan-Canadian Artificial Intelligence Strategy.

Regulation of artificial intelligence is the development of public sector policies and laws for promoting and regulating artificial intelligence (AI). It is part of the broader regulation of algorithms. The regulatory and policy landscape for AI is an emerging issue in jurisdictions worldwide, including for international organizations without direct enforcement power like the IEEE or the OECD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artificial Intelligence Cold War</span> Geopolitical narrative

The Artificial Intelligence Cold War (AI Cold War) is a narrative in which tensions between the United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the People's Republic of China lead to a Second Cold War waged in the area of artificial intelligence technology rather than in the areas of nuclear capabilities or ideology. The context of the AI Cold War narrative is the AI arms race, which involves a build-up of military capabilities using AI technology by the US and China and the usage of increasingly advanced semiconductors which power those capabilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mina Hsiang</span> Engineer and product executive

Mina Hsiang is an engineer and product executive. She is the third administrator of the United States Digital Service in the Executive Office of the President of the United States. Hsiang was on the original rescue team for Healthcare.gov.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Generative artificial intelligence</span> AI system capable of generating content in response to prompts

Generative artificial intelligence is a subset of artificial intelligence that uses generative models to produce text, images, videos, or other forms of data. These models often generate output in response to specific prompts. Generative AI systems learn the underlying patterns and structures of their training data, enabling them to create new data.

The Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP) is a non-partisan U.S. think tank and private foundation focused on technology and security. Founded by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt in October 2021, SCSP's stated mission is to "make recommendations to strengthen America’s long-term competitiveness as artificial intelligence (AI) and other emerging technologies are reshaping our national security, economy, and society." It seeks to ensure that "America is positioned and organized to win the techno-economic competition between now and 2030."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Undetectable.ai</span> Online text analysis and obfuscation software

Undetectable AI is an artificial intelligence content detection and modification software designed to identify and alter artificially generated text, such as that produced by large language models.

Sneha Revanur is an Indian-American activist. She is the founder and president of Encode Justice, a youth organization advocating for the global regulation of artificial intelligence. In 2023, she was described by Politico as the "Greta Thunberg of AI".

Discussions on regulation of artificial intelligence in the United States have included topics such as the timeliness of regulating AI, the nature of the federal regulatory framework to govern and promote AI, including what agency should lead, the regulatory and governing powers of that agency, and how to update regulations in the face of rapidly changing technology, as well as the roles of state governments and courts.

The Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act, or SB 1047, is a 2024 California bill intended to "mitigate the risk of catastrophic harms from AI models so advanced that they are not yet known to exist". Specifically, the bill would apply to models which cost more than $100 million to train and were trained using a quantity of computing power greater than 1026 integer or floating-point operations. SB 1047 would apply to all AI companies doing business in California—the location of the company does not matter. The bill creates protections for whistleblowers and requires developers to perform risk assessments of their models prior to release, under the supervision of the Government Operations Agency. It would also establish CalCompute, a University of California public cloud computing cluster for startups, researchers and community groups.

An AI Safety Institute (AISI), in general, is a state-backed institute aiming to evaluate and ensure the safety of the most advanced artificial intelligence (AI) models, also called frontier AI models.

A chief AI officer (CAIO), also known as chief artificial intelligence officer, is a senior executive position responsible for an organization's artificial intelligence strategy, implementation, and governance. This business role emerged from the rapidly increasing deployment of AI technologies in business operations, education, and government.

Eric Mill is an American government technology executive and expert in cybersecurity. He currently serves in the Biden Administration at the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) as the executive director for Cloud Strategy in GSA's Technology Transformation Services. Previously, he served as a senior advisor to the Federal Chief Information Officer of the United States, within the Office of Management and Budget.

References

  1. ↑ "FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence". The White House. 2023-10-30. Retrieved 2023-11-12.
  2. ↑ "OMB Releases Implementation Guidance Following President Biden's Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence | OMB". The White House. 2023-11-01. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
  3. ↑ Wu, Tim (2023-11-07). "Opinion | In Regulating A.I., We May Be Doing Too Much. And Too Little". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-11-25. When President Biden signed his sweeping executive order on artificial intelligence last week...
  4. 1 2 Tate Ryan-Mosley; Melissa Heikkilä (2023-10-30). "Three things to know about the White House's executive order on AI". MIT Technology Review.
  5. 1 2 Lima, Cristiano; Zakrzewski, Cat (2023-10-30). "Biden Signs AI Executive Order, the Most Expansive Regulatory Attempt Yet". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2023-11-12.
  6. 1 2 Bridget Neill; John D. Hallmark; Richard J. Jackson; Dan Diasio (2023-10-31). "Key Takeaways from the Biden Administration Executive Order on AI". EY. Retrieved 2023-11-12.
  7. 1 2 Alder, Madison; Heilweil, Rebecca (2023-11-21). "Aronson takes chief AI officer position at NSF as agencies begin work on Biden executive order". FedScoop. Retrieved 2023-11-28.
  8. ↑ Leffer, Lauren (2023-10-31). "Biden's Executive Order on AI Is a Good Start, Experts Say, but Not Enough". Scientific American. Retrieved 2023-11-12.
  9. ↑ "Maintaining American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence". Federal Register. 2019-02-14.
  10. ↑ "Promoting the Use of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Federal Government". Federal Register. 2020-12-08.
  11. ↑ Leffer, Lauren. "Biden's Executive Order on AI Is a Good Start, Experts Say, but Not Enough". Scientific American. Retrieved 2023-11-29.
  12. ↑ Groll, Elias (2023-08-12). "White House is fast-tracking executive order on artificial intelligence". CyberScoop. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
  13. ↑ Krishan, Nihal (2023-10-26). "OSTP's Arati Prabhakar says OMB guidance on AI to be released 'soon' after AI executive order". FedScoop. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
  14. ↑ Kang, Cecilia; Sanger, David E. (2023-10-30). "Biden Issues Executive Order to Create A.I. Safeguards". The New York Times. Retrieved 2023-11-12.
  15. ↑ "Biden wants to move fast on AI safeguards and signs an executive order to address his concerns". AP News. 2023-10-30. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
  16. ↑ Gilmer, Ellen M.; Riley, Tonya (2023-11-27). "AI Goals Stretch Homeland Agency's Resources, Privacy Safeguards". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved 2023-11-28.
  17. ↑ Nihill, Caroline (2023-10-31). "VA launches tech sprint for health care innovation required by AI executive order". FedScoop. Retrieved 2023-11-28.
  18. ↑ Alder, Madison (2023-11-02). "NIST seeks participants for new artificial intelligence consortium". FedScoop. Retrieved 2023-11-29.
  19. 1 2 Morrison, Sara (2023-10-31). "President Biden's new plan to regulate AI". Vox. Retrieved 2023-11-29.
  20. ↑ Heath, Ryan (2023-11-01). "What's in Biden's AI executive order — and what's not". Axios. Retrieved 2023-11-28.
  21. ↑ Houston Chronicle Editorial Board (2023-11-03). "Biden's AI executive order is a first step toward protecting humanity (Editorial)". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
  22. ↑ "Biden's Executive Order Ensures Safe, Secure AI: Reactions". Mirage News. 2023-11-01. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
  23. ↑ Chatterjee, Mohar (2023-10-30). "White House offers a new strategy for AI — and picks new fights". POLITICO. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
  24. ↑ "Unpacking the President's AI Executive Order". CMSWire.com. Retrieved 2024-07-25.
  25. ↑ "Vast Majority of US voters of All Political Affiliations Support President Biden's Executive Order on AI - AI Policy Institute". 2023-10-30. Retrieved 2024-07-25.
  26. ↑ Krishan, Nihal (2023-11-09). "Tech groups push back on Biden AI executive order, raising concerns that it could crush innovation". FedScoop. Retrieved 2023-11-29.
  27. ↑ Feiner, Lauren; Field, Hayden (2023-11-02). "Biden's AI order didn't go far enough to address fairness, but it's a good first step, advocates say". CNBC. Retrieved 2023-11-29.


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.