Author | Thor Hanson |
---|---|
Country | United States |
Subject | Evolutionary biology |
Genre | Non-fiction |
Published | 2011 (Basic Books) |
Pages | 336 |
Awards | John Burroughs Medal Pacific Northwest Booksellers Association Award |
ISBN | 978-0-465-02013-3 |
Website | thorhanson |
Feathers: The Evolution of a Natural Miracle is a natural history book by American conservation biologist Thor Hanson. Published by Basic Books in 2011 and written for general audiences, the book discusses the significance of feathers, their evolution, and their history both in nature and in use by humans.
Feathers is divided into five parts. In "Evolution", Hanson discusses the scientific debate over how feathers evolved, interviewing ornithologists Richard Prum and Alan Feduccia, as well as paleontologist Xing Xu. In "Fluff", Hanson discusses how feathers play a role in regulating a bird's body temperature and how feather insulation has also been utilized by humans. "Flight" discusses how flight might have evolved in birds, interviewing Prum, Feduccia, Xu, and also ornithologist Ken Dial, who described wing-assisted incline running. In "Fancy", Hanson discusses the role of feathers in sexual selection, as well as how humans have utilized feathers for fashion, interviewing costume and fashion designers on the Las Vegas Strip and New York City. "Function" discusses how feathers have been adapted for other purposes, such as waterproofing, fly fishing, and quill pens.
Hanson decided he would write Feathers after going on a run and noticing a feather dropped at his feet by a vulture; coincidentally, he had considered writing a story involving vulture feathers earlier that day. The book was published first in hardcover by Basic Books in 2011, then in paperback in 2012. Critical reception to Feathers has predominantly been positive, with praise for Hanson's enthusiasm and writing. In 2012, Feathers won the Pacific Northwest Booksellers Association Award and the SB&F Prize in the Young Adult Science Book category, presented by the American Association for the Advancement of Science and Subaru. In 2013, the book was also awarded the John Burroughs Medal.
Thor Hanson is a researcher with a variety of interests. In addition to writing for general audiences, his published research includes the impact of forest fragmentation on bird nest predation, the impact of human warfare on conservation policy, the behavior of Neotropical monkeys and birds, and others. [1] [2] Hanson received a Ph.D. from the University of Idaho in 2006; for his dissertation, he studied the impact of habitat fragmentation on the ecology of a type of tropical tree. [2] [3]
Hanson's interest in feathers began after observing vultures in Kenya. [4] [5] According to Hanson, when brainstorming ideas for a new book, he considered a story which involved vultures and their feathers, and later that day, as he went on a run, he noticed four turkey vultures keeping watch over a roadkill deer. One of the vultures began flapping and dropped a feather at Hanson's feet. Moved by this coincidence, Hanson decided then to write a book about feathers. [6] [7] Basic Books first published Feathers in hardcover in 2011. In 2012, Basic Books published it in paperback as well, and the book has also been published as an ebook and audiobook. [8] An essay-length adaptation titled "The Multiple Miracles of Bird Feathers" appeared in the January–February 2012 edition of Audubon , published by the National Audubon Society. [9] Feathers is Hanson's second book, after The Impenetrable Forest: My Gorilla Years in Uganda (2008). [1]
Following a preface and introduction, Feathers is divided into five main parts: "Evolution" discusses the evolutionary history of feathers, "Fluff" explains the role of feathers in regulating body temperature, "Flight" discusses the origin of avian flight as well as its impact on human aviation, "Fancy" discusses the role of feathers in sexual selection and human fashion, and "Function" discusses the continuing evolution of feathers in both nature and human usage. [10]
Feathers begins with the 1861 discovery of the first Archaeopteryx fossil specimen and the resulting debate between English paleontologist Richard Owen, an opponent to evolution by natural selection, and Thomas Henry Huxley, an advocate for evolution. [11] Hanson himself visits the Wyoming Dinosaur Center, a small museum in Thermopolis, Wyoming, which had acquired an Archaeopteryx specimen. [12] Hanson interviews Richard Prum, the Coe Professor of Ornithology at Yale University, who proposed a developmental theory of feather evolution, which focuses "on how feathers grow and not worrying about what they're used for." [13] Hanson also interviews Alan Feduccia, a professor at the University of North Carolina, who disagrees with the scientific consensus that birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs. [14] Later, Hanson interviews Xing Xu, a Chinese paleontologist who described fossil specimens that helped support Prum's developmental theory, such as Beipiaosaurus and Microraptor . [15] Hanson also discusses the development of feathers in thin-billed prions, as well as how feather growth is controlled by the Sonic hedgehog gene. [16]
In "Fluff", Hanson describes his experience at Winter Ecology, a "hands-on exploration of cold-weather ecosystems" organized by Bernd Heinrich, a biologist at the University of Vermont. While staying in a log cabin in a remote location in western Maine, Hanson observed how golden-crowned kinglets and other birds were able to keep warm on nights when the temperature was −17 °F (−27 °C) and discusses the role of feathers in maintaining a comfortable body temperature for birds. [17] To understand how down feathers have been adapted for human purposes, Hanson interviews Travis Stier at the Pacific Coast Feather Company, which manufactures pillows and comforters made with feathers. [18] Later, Hanson discusses various strategies that birds employ to keep cool in warmer climates and during periods of muscular activity, such as flight and fast running, as well as the role of feathers in these strategies. [19]
Scientists disagree on how feathered flight originally evolved, and Hanson describes various viewpoints on the subject. The "ground-up" view holds that flight originated from theropod dinosaurs running along the ground, whereas the "tree-down" view holds that flight originated from animals who lived in trees "as a means to extend their hops from branch to branch". [21] Hanson discusses the issue with Feduccia, who argues for the "tree-down" view, noting that other vertebrates also developed flight from the tree down. [22] Hanson also discusses with Prum and Xu, who state that while the origin of feathers might have been ground-based theropods, the origin of flight could have been theropods who climbed trees, especially considering four-winged feathered theropods like Microraptor. [23] Hanson interviews Ken Dial, an ornithologist who described wing-assisted incline running (WAIR), a behavior exhibited by baby birds learning how to fly. WAIR has been proposed as an alternative model for the origin of avian flight, as it addresses weaknesses in both the "ground-up" and "tree-down" views. [24] Later, Hanson interviews Ken Franklin, who raised Frightful, a peregrine falcon whose dive was measured to be 242 miles per hour (389 km/h), making her the fastest flying animal on record. Franklin describes the role of feathers in improving the aerodynamics of a falcon's flight. [20] Hanson concludes the "Flight" section with discussion of how feathered flight has influenced human aviation. [25]
Hanson describes the behavior of birds-of-paradise and the role of their elaborate feathers in sexual selection. [27] Hanson also visits the Las Vegas Strip and observes how feathers play a role in pageant shows like Jubilee! . Hanson interviews Marios Ignadiou, the head of Jubilee!'s costume shop, as well as fashion designer Pete Menefree. [28] Hanson then describes the history of the feather trade in fashion. In the period before World War I, feathers were highly valuable commodities. Wanting to capitalize on the economic strength of feathers, the government of South Africa sponsored the Trans-Saharan Ostrich Expedition, led by Russel William Thornton to find the Barbary ostrich. [29] After much adversity, Thornton and his crew returned to South Africa in 1912 with 127 surviving Barbary ostriches. [30] Unfortunately, demand for feathers in fashion decreased dramatically a few years later, once more women entered the workforce for the war effort. [31] Hanson later interviews Leah Chalfen, a hat designer based in New York City who specializes in feathers. [32] Hanson also interviews Jodi Favazzo, the owner of the Rainbow Feather Company, which dyes feathers. [33]
Hanson rescues a grounded common murre by carrying it back to the ocean (takeoff is extremely difficult for murres if they are not on water). [34] He then explains how the structure of feathers is waterproofing, keeping birds dry in wet conditions. [35] Hanson interviews John Sullivan, an experienced fly fisher who explains the role of feathers in fly fishing. [36] Later, Hanson explains the history and use of feathers in quill pens, which he uses as an example of how feathers have been adapted for other purposes beyond their natural evolutionary purposes. [37] Hanson also describes his experience observing the behavior of vultures in Kenya, in which he discusses the lack of feathers on the heads of vultures. [38] Hanson interviews Kimberly Bostwick, an ornithologist and curator at Cornell University Museum of Vertebrates, who discusses her research in the club-winged manakin, a bird whose feathers enable it to make sounds with its wings. [39] In the National Museum of Natural History, Hanson interviews Carla Dove, who works in the museum's Feather Identification Lab, which identifies the species of bird which a feather originates from. [40]
In 2012, Feathers received the Pacific Northwest Booksellers Association Award, [41] [42] an annual award which recognizes "excellence in writing" from five U.S. states in the Pacific Northwest. [43] In the same year, Feathers also received the SB&F Prize in the Young Adult Science Book category, presented by the American Association for the Advancement of Science and Subaru. [44] Feathers was listed among the top ten best books of 2011 in the Sci-Tech category by the Library Journal. [45] Feathers received the John Burroughs Medal in 2013, which is awarded annually by the John Burroughs Association to "the author of a distinguished book of natural history". [46] [47]
Frances C. James, in a review published in The Condor , described the book as "scholarly and enjoyable", commenting that "Hanson has worked hard to summarize the science behind our current understanding of the form and function of feathers, their development and their evolution." Regarding Hanson's description of the origin of feathers and flight, James commented that Hanson could have taken "an even more critical approach" by stating that "Prum's developmental model has not really been tested ... Confirmation of the predictions of a theory is not a test unless the predictions help discriminate among alternative hypotheses." James eventually concluded, "I don't blame Hanson for not having delved more deeply into this subject. I just wish that ornithologists would evaluate alternative theories on the full weight of their evidence and stop misquoting Huxley." [48]
Pepper W. Trail wrote a review published in The Quarterly Review of Biology , commenting, "Hanson has a gift for narrative and is an engaging companion as he leads readers through sometimes complex material." Trail also commented, "There are, however, a few places where the author's zest for telling a good story led him astray." As an example, Trail observed that Hanson uses eight pages to discuss the Trans-Saharan Ostrich Expedition, but "less than four on the science of feather coloration, a field burgeoning with new discoveries." [49] In a review published in The Wilson Journal of Ornithology , Kimberly S. Bostwick described Hanson's writing as "engaging", writing that there is "something for everyone to learn", from professional ornithologists to non-biologists. Bostwick warned scientific readers, however, that Feathers uses poetic license "to adapt some of the historical accounts a little to make them flow as stories" and that "Hanson uses a few analogies to explain some of the more complex biological phenomenon that are not entirely accurate." [50]
Literary reception to Feathers has been positive. [3] Amanda Katz, in a review published by The New York Times , wrote that because Feathers is a work of synthesis, bird enthusiasts will find the book's content already "familiar", but noted that "as synthesis goes, it is gracious, funny, persuasive and wide ranging." [51] Peter Forbes, in a review published by The Guardian , stated that Hanson's "enthusiasm is infectious", particularly for a topic Forbes found "alluring". [52] The Economist published a review which also described Hanson as having "infectious enthusiasm" and stated, "Mr Hanson's unpretentious style makes what is essentially an excellent scientific work into an enjoyable read for the ignorant and uninitiated." [53] Irene Wanner, in a review published by The Seattle Times , highlighted Hanson's analogies, calling them "apt" and helping to "simplify complex concepts". [6] Kirkus Reviews described Feathers as a "delightful ramble through the byways of evolution and the wonderful world of birds." [5]
Scientific American published an online review of Feathers in their blog Tetrapod Zoology by Darren Naish. Naish commented that prior to Hanson's book, "it doesn’t seem that any one book has ever been devoted to feathers and feathers alone. ... Feathers is thus a rather significant book, and very nice it is too." Naish also stated that "Feathers is not the provincial view of someone only interested in ecology or conservation biology; on the contrary, this is a remarkably well-rounded review of the subject." [1] In a review published in the news magazine Maclean's , Brian Bethune praised Hanson's storytelling, writing, "For all the intriguing science, what really livens up Hanson's passionate discussion of his 'natural miracle' are the stories he tells." [54] Laurence A. Marschall, a physics professor at Gettysburg College, wrote in a review published in the magazine Natural History, "In sum, Feathers is an impressive blend of beauty, form, and function." [55]
Archaeopteryx, sometimes referred to by its German name, "Urvogel", is a genus of avian dinosaurs. The name derives from the ancient Greek ἀρχαῖος (archaīos), meaning "ancient", and πτέρυξ (ptéryx), meaning "feather" or "wing". Between the late 19th century and the early 21st century, Archaeopteryx was generally accepted by palaeontologists and popular reference books as the oldest-known bird. Older potential avialans have since been identified, including Anchiornis, Xiaotingia, and Aurornis.
Feathers are epidermal growths that form a distinctive outer covering, or plumage, on both avian (bird) and some non-avian dinosaurs and other archosaurs. They are the most complex integumentary structures found in vertebrates and a premier example of a complex evolutionary novelty. They are among the characteristics that distinguish the extant birds from other living groups.
"Archaeoraptor" is the informal generic name for a fossil chimera from China in an article published in National Geographic magazine in 1999. The magazine claimed that the fossil was a "missing link" between birds and terrestrial theropod dinosaurs. Even before this publication, there had been severe doubts about the fossil's authenticity. A further scientific study showed it to be a forgery constructed from rearranged pieces of real fossils from different species. Zhou et al. found that the head and upper body belong to a specimen of the primitive fossil bird Yanornis. A 2002 study found that the tail belongs to a small winged dromaeosaur, Microraptor, named in 2000. The legs and feet belong to an as-yet-unknown-animal.
Caudipteryx is a genus of small oviraptorosaur dinosaurs that lived in Asia during the Early Cretaceous, around 124.6 million years ago. They were feathered and extremely birdlike in their overall appearance, to the point that some paleontologists suggested it was a bird. Two species have been described: C. zoui, in 1998, and C. dongi, in 2000.
Protoavis is a problematic taxon known from fragmentary remains from Late Triassic Norian stage deposits near Post, Texas. The animal's true classification has been the subject of much controversy, and there are many different interpretations of what the taxon actually is. When it was first described, the fossils were described as being from a primitive bird which, if the identification is valid, would push back avian origins some 60-75 million years.
Sinosauropteryx is a compsognathid dinosaur. Described in 1996, it was the first dinosaur taxon outside of Avialae to be found with evidence of feathers. It was covered with a coat of very simple filament-like feathers. Structures that indicate colouration have also been preserved in some of its feathers, which makes Sinosauropteryx the first non-avialian dinosaurs where colouration has been determined. The colouration includes a reddish and light banded tail. Some contention has arisen with an alternative interpretation of the filamentous impression as remains of collagen fibres, but this has not been widely accepted.
Microraptor is a genus of small, four-winged dromaeosaurid dinosaurs. Numerous well-preserved fossil specimens have been recovered from Liaoning, China. They date from the early Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation, 125 to 120 million years ago. Three species have been named, though further study has suggested that all of them represent variation in a single species, which is properly called M. zhaoianus. Cryptovolans, initially described as another four-winged dinosaur, is usually considered to be a synonym of Microraptor.
A feathered dinosaur is any species of dinosaur possessing feathers. That includes all species of birds, but there is a hypothesis that many, if not all, non-avian dinosaur species also possessed feathers in some shape or form. That theory has been challenged by some research.
Scansoriopteryx is a genus of maniraptoran dinosaur. Described from only a single juvenile fossil specimen found in Liaoning, China, Scansoriopteryx is a sparrow-sized animal that shows adaptations in the foot indicating an arboreal (tree-dwelling) lifestyle. It possessed an unusual, elongated third finger which may have supported a membranous wing, much like the related Yi qi. The type specimen of Scansoriopteryx also contains the fossilized impression of feathers.
Longisquama is a genus of extinct reptile. There is only one species, Longisquama insignis, known from a poorly preserved skeleton and several incomplete fossil impressions from the Middle to Late Triassic Madygen Formation in Kyrgyzstan. It is known from the type fossil specimen, slab and counterslab and five referred specimens of possible integumentary appendages. All specimens are in the collection of the Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow.
Incisivosaurus is a genus of small, probably herbivorous theropod dinosaurs from the early Cretaceous Period of what is now the People's Republic of China. The first specimen to be described, IVPP V13326, is a skull that was collected from the lowermost levels of the Yixian Formation in the Sihetun area, near Beipiao City, in western Liaoning Province. The most significant, and highly unusual, characteristic of this dinosaur is its apparent adaptation to an herbivorous or omnivorous lifestyle. It was named for its prominent, rodent-like front teeth, which show wear patterns commonly found in plant-eating dinosaurs. The specific name gauthieri honors Dr. Jacques Gauthier, a pioneer of the phylogenetic method of classification.
The evolution of birds began in the Jurassic Period, with the earliest birds derived from a clade of theropod dinosaurs named Paraves. Birds are categorized as a biological class, Aves. For more than a century, the small theropod dinosaur Archaeopteryx lithographica from the Late Jurassic period was considered to have been the earliest bird. Modern phylogenies place birds in the dinosaur clade Theropoda. According to the current consensus, Aves and a sister group, the order Crocodilia, together are the sole living members of an unranked reptile clade, the Archosauria. Four distinct lineages of bird survived the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event 66 million years ago, giving rise to ostriches and relatives (Palaeognathae), waterfowl (Anseriformes), ground-living fowl (Galliformes), and "modern birds" (Neoaves).
Odontognathae is a disused name for a paraphyletic group of toothed prehistoric birds. The group was originally proposed by Alexander Wetmore, who attempted to link fossil birds with the presence of teeth, specifically of the orders Hesperornithiformes and Ichthyornithiformes. As such they would be regarded as transitional fossils between the reptile-like "Archaeornithes" like Archaeopteryx and modern birds. They were described by Romer as birds with essentially modern anatomy, but retaining teeth.
The scientific question of within which larger group of animals birds evolved has traditionally been called the "origin of birds". The present scientific consensus is that birds are a group of maniraptoran theropod dinosaurs that originated during the Mesozoic Era.
John Alan Feduccia is a paleornithologist specializing in the origins and phylogeny of birds. He is S. K. Heninger Distinguished Professor Emeritus at the University of North Carolina. Feduccia's authored works include three major books, The Age of Birds, The Origin and Evolution of Birds, Riddle of the Feathered Dragons, and many peer-reviewed papers in ornithological and biological journals.
Proavis refers to a hypothetical extinct species or hypothetical extinct taxon and was coined in the early 20th century in an attempt to support and explain the hypothetical evolutionary steps and anatomical adaptations leading from non-avian theropod dinosaurs to birds. The term has also been used by defenders of the thecodontian origin of birds.
Richard O. Prum is an evolutionary biologist and ornithologist. He is the William Robertson Coe Professor of Ornithology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Yale University, as well as the head curator of vertebrate zoology at the university's Peabody Museum of Natural History. His 2017 book The Evolution of Beauty: How Darwin’s Forgotten Theory of Mate Choice Shapes the Animal World—and Us was named one of the 10 Best Books of 2017 by The New York Times and was a finalist for the 2018 Pulitzer Prize in General Nonfiction.
The Origin of Birds is an early synopsis of bird evolution written in 1926 by Gerhard Heilmann, a Danish artist and amateur zoologist. The book was born from a series of articles published between 1913 and 1916 in Danish, and although republished as a book it received mainly criticism from established scientists and got little attention within Denmark. The English edition of 1926, however, became highly influential at the time due to the breadth of evidence synthesized as well as the artwork used to support its arguments. It was considered the last word on the subject of bird evolution for several decades after its publication.
Thor Hanson is an American conservation biologist and author. Hanson has published five books for general audiences and one children's book. He has also contributed to a range of periodicals and other media, including the PBS program, American Spring LIVE.
The Evolution of Beauty: How Darwin's Forgotten Theory of Mate Choice Shapes the Animal World—and Us is a 2017 book by the ornithologist and evolutionary biologist Richard O. Prum about the power of aesthetic mate choice, arguing it to be an important independent agent in evolution. Prum indicates that while Charles Darwin made this argument in The Descent of Man, published in 1871, the concept was sidelined and forgotten and the notion of natural selection being the sole driver of evolution took over. As an ornithologist, Prum describes many examples in avian evolution where aesthetics are preeminent. Prum proceeds to apply the principle of aesthetic evolution as an independent force in human evolution.