Gotha Go P.60

Last updated
Go P.60
Gotha Go P.60 art.jpg
Artist's impression of the Gotha Go P.60
General information
Type Fighter
National origin Germany
Manufacturer Gothaer Waggonfabrik
StatusAbandoned
Primary user Luftwaffe (intended)
History
Manufactured1945
Developed from Horten Ho 229

The Gotha Go P.60 was a jet-powered flying wing fighter proposed during World War II by Gothaer Waggonfabrik (Gotha). The initial concept a two-seat multi-role fighter that was subsequently developed into a three-seat night and all-weather fighter, but no variant was ever built.

Contents

Design and development

Gotha had received the production contract for the single-seat Horten Ho 229 flying-wing fighter in June 1944, but numerous design changes were needed to make it suitable for production. Dissatisfied at what he felt were fundamental flaws in the Horten design, [1] Gotha's chief aerodynamicist, Dr. Rudolf Göthert, decided to develop an alternative design to the Ho 229 that incorporated the latest research and was intended to satisfy the requirements of the Luftwaffe High Command (Oberkommando der Luftwaffe). These included a two-man crew, a pressurized cockpit for high-altitude combat, tricycle landing gear, the option to install more powerful turbojet engines and an increase in range over the Horten aircraft. [2] [3]

Although design work probably began in late 1944, the first known design sketches are dated from January 1945 and the company submitted three related designs to the Luftwaffe on 11 March. All of these had two turbojet engines mounted in external nacelles above and below the wing. The aircraft were intended to fulfill the heavy fighter, fighter-bomber, reconnaissance and night-fighter roles. The Go P.60A was a direct competitor to the Ho 229 and could be fitted with either BMW 003 or Heinkel HeS 011 engines. Göthert's proposal made no mention of a rocket-boosted version of the P.60A. The P.60B was a larger version with more powerful engines and greater range. Both of these variants showed the cockpit fully faired into the leading edge of the fuselage, with the pilot and a observer in side-by-side prone positions. They were to be armed with either four 30-millimetre (1.2 in) MK 108 cannon or two MK 103 cannon. [4]

The nose-mounted FuG 240 Berlin radar of the night fighter P.60C model forced a reversion to a more conventional tandem cockpit arrangement with the radar operator behind the pilot. This version's armament was planned as four MK 108 cannon in the wings and an additional pair firing upwards in a Schräge Musik arrangement that was positioned behind the radar operator. Göthert was unaware that the Luftwaffe had revised its requirement to three crewmen on 1 March, but was able to submit a revised design on 21 March with the rear cockpit replaced by an additional fuel tank and additional cockpits added in the wing roots on each side of the pilot. To improve lateral stability of the C model, two small vertical stabilizers were added near the wing tips [5]

In his proposal, Göthert also mentioned that wind tunnel testing was in progress on a version with the engines positioned side-by-side at the rear of the center wing section with a wide air intake protruding from the bottom of the fuselage. One drawing of this version showed the wings with pronounced dihedral and different control surfaces at the wing tips. [6]

Description

All versions of the P.60 were intended to be constructed from steel tubing covered with plywood. The aircraft was built in three sections, two outer wings and the center section. This latter section contained the crew, engines, landing gear, armament. [7] The center section of the -skinned fuselage would be built from with wings made from wood. [3] Yaw control would have been provided by a pair of retractable drag rudders near the tip of each wing. [8] Fuel would be carried in a center tank and in the wings. The trailing edges of the wings were fitted with elevons. [3] [8]

The Go P.60C was proposed as a night fighter variant. A radar was to be fitted in a lengthened nose, and three upward-firing MK 108 cannons would have complemented the four cannons of the previous model. Power was to be provided by a pair of either BMW 003 or HeS 011 engines, complemented by a single Walter HWK solid-fueled booster rocket. Work on the Go P.60 was halted by the end of the war in Europe.

Variants

Go P.60A, initial version featuring a prone cockpit and two BMW 003A-1 engines mounted vertically. None built.

Go P.60B, simplified version featuring a conventional cockpit and rudders. Prototype halted midway through construction.

Go P.60C, night fighter version with a radar in the nose. None built.

Go P-60.007, variant with a layout similar to the A but with the engines recessed beneath the fuselage and noticeable dihedral. Known only from a drawing, it may be the "fourth" variant mentioned in a March 1945 report by Gôthert. [9]

Specifications (Go P.60A, as designed)

A P.60C replica on display at Rechlin Aviation Museum Gotha P-60C.jpg
A P.60C replica on display at Rechlin Aviation Museum

Data fromSecret Projects: Flying Wings and Tailless Aircraft, [8] Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe: Jet Fighters 1939-1945 [10]

General characteristics

Performance

Armament
4 × 30 mm MK 108 cannon or 2 × 30 mm MK 103 cannon

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Horten Ho 229</span> German prototype fighter/bomber (1944)

The Horten H.IX, RLM designation Ho 229 was a German prototype fighter/bomber designed by Reimar and Walter Horten to be built by Gothaer Waggonfabrik. Developed at a late stage of the Second World War, it was one of the first flying wing aircraft to be powered by jet engines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flying wing</span> Tailless fixed-wing aircraft that has no definite fuselage

A flying wing is a tailless fixed-wing aircraft that has no definite fuselage, with its crew, payload, fuel, and equipment housed inside the main wing structure. A flying wing may have various small protuberances such as pods, nacelles, blisters, booms, or vertical stabilizers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henschel Hs 132</span> 1945 prototype multi-role combat aircraft by Henschel

The Henschel Hs 132 was a World War II dive bomber and interceptor aircraft of the German Luftwaffe that never saw service. The unorthodox design featured a top-mounted BMW 003 jet engine and the pilot in a prone position. The Soviet Army occupied the factory just as the Hs 132 V1 was nearing flight testing, the V2 and V3 being 80% and 75% completed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Focke-Wulf Ta 183</span> Jet powered interceptor concept aircraft

The Focke-Wulf Ta 183 Huckebein was a design for a jet-powered fighter aircraft intended as the successor to the Messerschmitt Me 262 and other day fighters in Luftwaffe service during World War II. It had been developed only to the extent of wind tunnel models when the war ended, but the basic design was further developed postwar in Argentina as the FMA IAe 33 Pulqui II. The name Huckebein is a reference to a trouble-making raven from an illustrated story in 1867 by Wilhelm Busch.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Horten H.XVIII</span> Proposed intercontinental bomber

The Horten H.XVIII (18) was a proposed German World War II intercontinental bomber, designed by the Horten brothers. The unbuilt H.XVIII represented, in many respects, a scaled-up version of the Horten Ho 229, a prototype jet fighter. The H.XVIII was one of many proposed designs for the Langstreckenbomber, and would have carried sufficient fuel for transatlantic flights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Messerschmitt P.1112</span> German fighter project

The Messerschmitt P.1112 was a proposed German jet fighter, developed by Messerschmitt AG during the closing stages of World War II, and intended for use by the Luftwaffe. The progress of the war prevented the completion of a prototype before the fall of Nazi Germany. Its design, however, had a direct influence on postwar US Navy carrier fighters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heinkel P.1079</span> Type of aircraft

The Heinkel He P.1079 was a projected German V-tail all weather jet fighter designed by Heinkel Flugzeugwerke in the closing stages of World War II. The aircraft was only a design; it was not produced.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arado E.381</span> German WWII aircraft

The Arado E.381 was a proposed parasite fighter aircraft. Conceived by Arado Flugzeugwerke in December 1944 for Germany's Luftwaffe during World War II, the E.381 was to have been carried aloft by and launched from an Arado Ar 234 "mother" aircraft. It would then have activated its rocket engine, which would have propelled it to attack Allied bombers. Development was cancelled due to lack of funds and official support.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heinkel P.1073</span> Type of aircraft

The Heinkel P.1073, known also as Strahljäger, was a fighter project developed for the Luftwaffe by Heinkel aircraft manufacturing company during the last years of World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blohm & Voss P 211</span> Type of aircraft

The Blohm & Voss P 211 was a design proposal submitted by Blohm & Voss to the Volksjäger jet fighter competition of the Luftwaffe Emergency Fighter Program towards the end of the Second World War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Junkers EF 128</span> Type of aircraft

The Junkers EF 128 was a project for a single-engine jet fighter, developed for the Emergency Fighter Program Luftwaffe design competition during the Second World War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Messerschmitt P.1110</span> German high-altitude interceptor project

The Messerschmitt P.1110 was a design for a single-seat, high-altitude interceptor, prepared for the German Luftwaffe by the Messerschmitt aircraft manufacturing company, under the Emergency Fighter Program during the last months of World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Messerschmitt P.1099</span> German fighter prototype

The Messerschmitt P.1099 was a two-seat prototype jet plane designed by Messerschmitt for the Luftwaffe before the end of the Second World War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Focke-Wulf Volksjäger</span> Type of aircraft

The Focke-Wulf Volksjäger, was a German emergency fighter project for the Luftwaffe. It was designed by Focke-Wulf towards the end of World War II as part of the defense effort against the devastating Allied bombing raids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Messerschmitt P.1079</span> German fighter project

The Messerschmitt P.1079 was a series of pulsejet-powered Messerschmitt fighter projects during the Second World War. The P.1079 aircraft designs were to be powered by pulse jets, the same engines used in the V-1 flying bomb.

The Blohm & Voss P215 was an advanced jet night fighter project by Blohm & Voss during the Second World War. With a crew of three and twin jet engines, it featured a tailless swept-wing layout and heavy armament. An order for three prototypes was received just weeks before the war ended.

The Blohm & Voss P 209 was one of a series of single-engined jet fighter design studies. Under development in the latter half of 1944, when the single-engined jet fighter requirement was issued the P 209 was radically revised to meet the deadline but was not taken further by the RLM.

The Lippisch Delta VI was a proposed single-seat, twin-jet experimental delta flying wing aircraft begun in 1943 by German designer Alexander Lippisch, as the developed version of the P.11 bomber project begun while he was still working for Messerschmitt in 1942. The only prototype was destroyed in June 1944 while still under construction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Messerschmitt Me 262 variants</span> Variants of the Messerschmitt Me 262

The Messerschmitt Me 262 was a German World War II fighter aircraft built by Messerschmitt in the later stages of the war, and under license by Avia post-war.

References

  1. Shepelev & Ottens, pp. 59–61
  2. Sharp 2017, p. 58
  3. 1 2 3 Schick & Meyer, p. 88
  4. Sharp 2020, pp. 112–114
  5. Sharp 2020, pp. 280–281
  6. Sharp 2020, pp. 113–114
  7. Metzmacher, pp. 136–137
  8. 1 2 3 Rose, p. 48
  9. Sharp 2020, pp. 112–113
  10. Sharp 2020, p. 113

Bibliography