Great Red Spot

Last updated
Close up view of the Great Red Spot by Juno Jupiter - Great Red Spot - PJ7-60 61 62 - Balanced (49803032983).png
Close up view of the Great Red Spot by Juno

The Great Red Spot is a persistent high-pressure region in the atmosphere of Jupiter, producing an anticyclonic storm that is the largest in the Solar System. It is the most recognizable feature on Jupiter, owing to its red-orange color whose origin is still unknown. Located 22 degrees south of Jupiter's equator, it produces wind-speeds up to 432 km/h (268 mph). It was first observed in September 1831, with 60 recorded observations between then and 1878, when continuous observations began. [1] [2] A similar spot was observed from 1665 to 1713; if this is the same storm, it has existed for at least 359 years, [3] but a study from 2024 suggests this is not the case. [4]

Contents

Observation history

First observations

Donato Creti's 1711 painting "Jupiter", the first depiction of the Great Red Spot as red Donato Creti - Astronomical Observations - 06 - Jupiter.jpg
Donato Creti's 1711 painting "Jupiter", the first depiction of the Great Red Spot as red
A sketch of Jupiter made by Thomas Gwyn Elger in November 1881, showing the Great Red Spot Jupiter Great Red Spot Elger November 1881.png
A sketch of Jupiter made by Thomas Gwyn Elger in November 1881, showing the Great Red Spot

The Great Red Spot may have existed before 1665, but it could be that the present spot was first seen only in 1830, and was well studied only after a prominent appearance in 1879. The storm that was seen in the 17th century may have been different from the storm that exists today. [5] A long gap separates its period of current study after 1830 from its 17th century discovery. Whether the original spot dissipated and reformed, whether it faded, or if the observational record was simply poor is unknown. [6]

The first sighting of the Great Red Spot is often credited to Robert Hooke, who described a spot on the planet in May 1664. However, it is likely that Hooke's spot was not only in another belt altogether (the North Equatorial Belt, as opposed to the current Great Red Spot's location in the South Equatorial Belt), but also that it was in the shadow of a transiting moon, most likely Callisto. [7] Far more convincing is Giovanni Cassini's description of a "permanent spot" the following year. [8] With fluctuations in visibility, Cassini's spot was observed from 1665 to 1713, but the 48-year observational gap makes the identity of the two spots inconclusive. The older spot's shorter observational history and slower motion than the modern spot makes it difficult to conclude that they are the same. [9]

A minor mystery concerns a Jovian spot depicted in a 1711 canvas by Donato Creti, which is exhibited in the Vatican. [10] [11] Part of a series of panels in which different (magnified) heavenly bodies serve as backdrops for various Italian scenes, and all overseen by the astronomer Eustachio Manfredi for accuracy, Creti's painting is the first known depiction of the Great Red Spot as red (albeit raised to the Jovian northern hemisphere due to an optical inversion inherent to the era's telescopes). No Jovian feature was explicitly described in writing as red before the late 19th century. [11]

The Great Red Spot has been observed since 5 September 1831. By 1879, over 60 observations had been recorded. [1] Since it came into prominence in 1879, it has been under continuous observation.

A 2024 study of historical observations suggests that the "permanent spot" observed from 1665 to 1713 may not be the same as the modern Great Red Spot observed since 1831. It is suggested that the original spot disappeared, and later another spot formed, which is the one seen today. [4]

Late 20th and 21st centuries

A wide view of Jupiter and the Great Red Spot as seen from Voyager 1 in 1979. Great Red Spot From Voyager 1.jpg
A wide view of Jupiter and the Great Red Spot as seen from Voyager 1 in 1979.

On 25 February 1979, [12] when the Voyager 1 spacecraft was 9,200,000 km (5,700,000 mi) from Jupiter, it transmitted the first detailed image of the Great Red Spot. Cloud details as small as 160 km (100 mi) across were visible. The colorful, wavy cloud pattern seen to the left (west) of the Red Spot is a region of extraordinarily complex and variable wave motion.

In the 21st century, the major diameter of the Great Red Spot has been observed to be shrinking in size. At the start of 2004, its length was about half that of a century earlier, when it reached a size of 40,000 km (25,000 mi), about three times the diameter of Earth. At the present rate of reduction, it will become circular by 2040. It is not known how long the spot will last, or whether the change is a result of normal fluctuations. [13] In 2019, the Great Red Spot began "flaking" at its edge, with fragments of the storm breaking off and dissipating. [14] The shrinking and "flaking" fueled speculation from some astronomers that the Great Red Spot could dissipate within 20 years. [15] However, other astronomers believe that the apparent size of the Great Red Spot reflects its cloud coverage and not the size of the actual, underlying vortex, and they also believe that the flaking events can be explained by interactions with other cyclones or anticyclones, including incomplete absorptions of smaller systems; if this is the case, this would mean that the Great Red Spot is not in danger of dissipating. [16]

A smaller spot, designated Oval BA, which formed in March 2000 from the merging of three white ovals, [17] has turned reddish in color. Astronomers have named it the Little Red Spot or Red Jr. As of 5 June 2006, the Great Red Spot and Oval BA appeared to be approaching convergence. [18] The storms pass each other about every two years, but the passing of 2002 and 2004 were of little significance. Amy Simon-Miller, of the Goddard Space Flight Center, predicted the storms would have their closest passing on 4 July 2006. She worked with Imke de Pater and Phil Marcus of UC Berkeley as well as a team of professional astronomers beginning in April 2006 to study the storms using the Hubble Space Telescope; on 20 July 2006, the two storms were photographed passing each other by the Gemini Observatory without converging. [19] In May 2008, a third storm turned red. [20]

The Juno spacecraft, which entered into a polar orbit around Jupiter in 2016, flew over the Great Red Spot upon its close approach to Jupiter on 11 July 2017, taking several images of the storm from a distance of about 8,000 km (5,000 mi) above the surface. [21] [22] Over the duration of the Juno mission, the spacecraft continued to study the composition and evolution of Jupiter's atmosphere, especially its Great Red Spot. [21]

The Great Red Spot should not be confused with the Great Dark Spot, a feature observed near the northern pole of Jupiter in 2000 with the Cassini–Huygens spacecraft. [23] There is also a feature in the atmosphere of Neptune called the Great Dark Spot. The latter feature was imaged by Voyager 2 in 1989 and may have been an atmospheric hole rather than a storm. It was no longer present as of 1994, although a similar spot had appeared farther to the north.

Mechanical dynamics

Time-lapse sequence from the approach of Voyager 1 to Jupiter in 1979, showing the motion of atmospheric bands, and the circulation of the Great Red Spot. 790106-0203 Voyager 58M to 31M reduced.gif
Time-lapse sequence from the approach of Voyager 1 to Jupiter in 1979, showing the motion of atmospheric bands, and the circulation of the Great Red Spot.

Jupiter's Great Red Spot rotates counterclockwise, with a period of about 4.5 Earth days, [24] or 11 Jovian days, as of 2008. Measuring 16,350 km (10,160 mi) in width as of 3 April 2017, the Great Red Spot is 1.3 times the diameter of Earth. [21] The cloud-tops of this storm are about 8 km (5 mi) above the surrounding cloud-tops. [25] The storm has continued to exist for centuries because there is no planetary surface (only a mantle of hydrogen) to provide friction; circulating gas eddies persist for a very long time in the atmosphere because there is nothing to oppose their angular momentum. [26]

Infrared data has long indicated that the Great Red Spot is colder (and thus higher in altitude) than most of the other clouds on the planet. [27] The upper atmosphere above the storm, however, has substantially higher temperatures than the rest of the planet. Acoustic (sound) waves rising from the turbulence of the storm below have been proposed as an explanation for the heating of this region. [28] The acoustic waves travel vertically up to a height of 800 km (500 mi) above the storm where they break in the upper atmosphere, converting wave energy into heat. This creates a region of upper atmosphere that is 1,600 K (1,330 °C; 2,420 °F)—several hundred kelvins warmer than the rest of the planet at this altitude. [28] The effect is described as like "crashing [...] ocean waves on a beach". [29]

Size of the Earth compared to the Great Red Spot Jupiter, Earth size comparison.jpg
Size of the Earth compared to the Great Red Spot

Careful tracking of atmospheric features revealed the Great Red Spot's counterclockwise circulation as far back as 1966, observations dramatically confirmed by the first time-lapse movies from the Voyager fly-bys. [30] The spot is confined by a modest eastward jet stream to its south and a very strong westward one to its north. [31] Though winds around the edge of the spot peak at about 432 km/h (268 mph), currents inside it seem stagnant, with little inflow or outflow. [32] The rotation period of the spot has decreased with time, perhaps as a direct result of its steady reduction in size. [33]

The Great Red Spot's latitude has been stable for the duration of good observational records, typically varying by about a degree. Its longitude, however, is subject to constant variation, including a 90-day longitudinal oscillation with an amplitude of ~1°. [34] [35] Because Jupiter does not rotate uniformly at all latitudes, astronomers have defined three different systems for defining longitude. System II is used for latitudes of more than 10 degrees and was originally based on the average rotational period of the Great Red Spot of 9h 55m 42s. [36] Despite this, however, the spot has "lapped" the planet in System II at least 10 times since the early 19th century. Its drift rate has changed dramatically over the years and has been linked to the brightness of the South Equatorial Belt and the presence or absence of a South Tropical Disturbance. [37]

Internal depth and structure

Clockwise from top left: Hubble image of visible spectrum; infrared from the Gemini Observatory; multiwavelength composite of Hubble and Gemini data showing visible light in blue and thermal infrared in red; ultraviolet image from Hubble; visible light detail Telescopes and Spacecraft Join Forces to Probe Deep into Jupiter's Atmosphere (49892941386).png
Clockwise from top left: Hubble image of visible spectrum; infrared from the Gemini Observatory; multiwavelength composite of Hubble and Gemini data showing visible light in blue and thermal infrared in red; ultraviolet image from Hubble; visible light detail

Jupiter's Great Red Spot (GRS) is an elliptical shaped anticyclone, occurring at 22 degrees below the equator, in Jupiter's southern hemisphere. [39] The largest anticyclonic storm (~16,000 km) in our solar system, little is known about its internal depth and structure. [40] Visible imaging and cloud-tracking from in-situ observation determined the velocity and vorticity of the GRS, which is located in a thin anticyclonic ring at 70–85% of the radius and is located along Jupiter's fastest westward moving jet stream. [41] During NASA's 2016 Juno mission, gravity signature and thermal infrared [41] [42] data were obtained that offered insight into the structural dynamics and depth of the GRS. [40] [41] During July 2017, the Juno spacecraft conducted a second pass of the GRS to collect Microwave Radiometer (MWR) scans of the GRS to determine how far the GRS extended toward the surface of the condensed H2O layer. [40] These MWR scans suggested that the GRS vertical depth extended to about 240 km below cloud level, with an estimated drop in atmospheric pressure to 100 bar. [40] [41] Two methods of analysis that constrain the data collected were the mascon approach, which found a depth of ~290 km, and the Slepian approach showing wind extending to ~310 km. [40] These methods, along with gravity signature MWR data, suggest that the GRS zonal winds still increase at a rate of 50% of the velocity of the viable cloud level, before the wind decay starts at lower levels. This rate of wind decay and gravity data suggest the depth of the GRS is between 200 and 500 km. [40]

Galileo and Cassini's thermal infrared imaging and spectroscopy of the GRS were conducted during 1995–2008, in order to find evidence of thermal inhomogeneities within the internal structure vortex of the GRS. [41] Previous thermal infrared temperature maps from the Voyager, Galileo, and Cassini missions suggested the GRS is a structure of an anticyclonic vortex with a cold core within a upwelling warmer annulus; this data shows a gradient in the temperature of the GRS. [39] [41] Better understanding of Jupiter's atmospheric temperature, aerosol particle opacity, and ammonia gas composition was provided by thermal-IR imaging: a direct correlation of the visible cloud layers reactions, thermal gradient and compositional mapping to observational data were collected over decades. [39] [41] During December 2000, high spatial resolution images from Galileo, of an atmospheric turbulent area to the northwest of the GRS, showed a thermal contrast between the warmest region of the anticyclone and regions to the east and west of the GRS. [41] [43]

Winds in the Great Red Spot as analyzed from Hubble's data. Red means faster wind, blue means slower wind. Winds in Jupiter's Great Red Spot.jpg
Winds in the Great Red Spot as analyzed from Hubble's data. Red means faster wind, blue means slower wind.

The vertical temperature of the structure of the GRS is constrained between the 100–600 mbar range, with the vertical temperature of the GRS core is approximately 400 mbar of pressure[ clarification needed ], being 1.0–1.5 K, much warmer than regions of the GRS to the east–west, and 3.0–3.5 K warmer than regions to the north–south of the structures edge. [41] This structure is consistent with the data collected by the VISIR (VLT Mid-Infrared Imager Spectrometer on the ESO Very Large Telescope) imaging obtained in 2006; this revealed that the GRS was physically present at a wide range of altitudes that occur within the atmospheric pressure range of 80–600 mbar, and confirms the thermal infrared mapping result. [41] [42] [45] To develop a model of the internal structure of the GRS the Cassini mission Composite Infrared Spectrometer (CIRS) and ground based spatial imaging mapped the composition of the phosphine and ammonia aerosols (PH3, NH3) and para-hydroxybenzoic acid within the anticyclonic circulation of the GRS. [41] [46] The images that were collected from the CIRS and ground-based imaging trace the vertical motion in the Jovian atmosphere by PH3 and NH3 spectra. [39] [41]

The highest concentrations of PH3 and NH3 were found to the north of the GRS peripheral rotation. They aided in determining the southward jet movement and showed evidence of an increase in altitude of the column of aerosols with pressures ranging from 200–500 mbar. [41] [47] However, the NH3 composition data shows that there is a major depletion of NH3 below the visible cloud layer at the southern peripheral ring of the GRS; this lower opacity is relative to a narrow band of atmospheric subsidence. [41] The low mid-IR aerosol opacity, along with the temperature gradients, the altitude difference, and the vertical movement of the zonal winds, are involved with the development and sustainability of the vorticity. [41] The stronger atmospheric subsidence and compositional asymmetries of the GRS suggest that the structure exhibits a degree of tilt from the northern edge to the southern edge of the structure. [41] [48] The GRS depth and internal structure has been constantly changing over decades; [40] however there is still no logical reason that it is 200–500 km in depth, but the jet streams that supply the force that powers the GRS vortex are well below the structure base. [40] [41]

Color and composition

It is not known what causes the Great Red Spot's reddish color. Hypotheses supported by laboratory experiments suppose that it may be caused by chemical products created from the solar ultraviolet irradiation of ammonium hydrosulfide [49] and the organic compound acetylene, which produces a reddish material—likely complex organic compounds called tholins. [50] The high altitude of the compounds may also contribute to the coloring. [51]

The Great Red Spot varies greatly in hue, from almost brick-red to pale salmon or even white. The spot occasionally disappears, becoming evident only through the Red Spot Hollow, which is its location in the South Equatorial Belt (SEB). Its visibility is apparently coupled to the SEB; when the belt is bright white, the spot tends to be dark, and when it is dark, the spot is usually light. These periods when the spot is dark or light occur at irregular intervals; from 1947 to 1997, the spot was darkest in the periods 1961–1966, 1968–1975, 1989–1990, and 1992–1993. [6]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Giant planet</span> Planet much larger than the Earth

A giant planet, sometimes referred to as a jovian planet, is a diverse type of planet much larger than Earth. Giant planets are usually primarily composed of low-boiling point materials (volatiles), rather than rock or other solid matter, but massive solid planets can also exist. There are four such planets in the Solar System: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Many extrasolar giant planets have been identified.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jupiter</span> Fifth planet from the Sun

Jupiter is the fifth planet from the Sun and the largest in the Solar System. A gas giant, Jupiter's mass is more than two and a half times that of all the other planets in the Solar System combined and slightly less than one one-thousandth the mass of the Sun. Jupiter orbits the Sun at a distance of 5.20 AU (778.5 Gm) with an orbital period of 11.86 years. It is the third brightest natural object in the Earth's night sky after the Moon and Venus and has been observed since prehistoric times. Its name derives from Jupiter, the chief deity of ancient Roman religion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Dark Spot</span> Large storm in Neptunes atmosphere

The Great Dark Spot was one of a series of dark spots on Neptune similar in appearance to Jupiter's Great Red Spot. In 1989, GDS-89 was the first Great Dark Spot on Neptune to be observed by NASA's Voyager 2 space probe. Like Jupiter's spot, the Great Dark Spots are anticyclonic storms. However, their interiors are relatively cloud-free, and unlike Jupiter's spot, which has lasted for hundreds of years, their lifetimes appear to be shorter, forming and dissipating once every few years or so. Based on observations taken with Voyager 2 and since then with the Hubble Space Telescope, Neptune appears to spend somewhat more than half its time with a Great Dark Spot. Little is known about the origins, movement, and disappearance of the dark spots observed on the planet since 1989.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Io (moon)</span> Innermost of the four Galilean moons of Jupiter

Io, or Jupiter I, is the innermost and second-smallest of the four Galilean moons of the planet Jupiter. Slightly larger than Earth's moon, Io is the fourth-largest moon in the Solar System, has the highest density of any moon, the strongest surface gravity of any moon, and the lowest amount of water by atomic ratio of any known astronomical object in the Solar System. It was discovered in 1610 by Galileo Galilei and was named after the mythological character Io, a priestess of Hera who became one of Zeus's lovers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anticyclonic storm</span> Type of storm

An anticyclonic storm is a storm with a high-pressure center, in which winds flow in the direction opposite to that of the flow above a region of low pressure. Unlike a cyclonic storm, anticyclonic storms are typically associated with fair weather and stable atmospheric conditions. On other planets or in rare cases on Earth, anticyclones can contribute to inclement weather. Examples include Hartmut, which brought a blizzard to the British Isles in 2018, as well as persistent anticyclonic storms on Jupiter and Neptune.

<i>Juno</i> (spacecraft) Second NASA orbiter mission to Jupiter (2011–Present)

Juno is a NASA space probe orbiting the planet Jupiter. It was built by Lockheed Martin and is operated by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The spacecraft was launched from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on August 5, 2011 UTC, as part of the New Frontiers program. Juno entered a polar orbit of Jupiter on July 5, 2016, UTC, to begin a scientific investigation of the planet. After completing its mission, Juno was originally planned to be intentionally deorbited into Jupiter's atmosphere, but has since been approved to continue orbiting until contact is lost with the spacecraft.

An extraterrestrial vortex is a vortex that occurs on planets and natural satellites other than Earth that have sufficient atmospheres. Most observed extraterrestrial vortices have been seen in large cyclones, or anticyclones. However, occasional dust storms have been known to produce vortices on Mars and Titan. Various spacecraft missions have recorded evidence of past and present extraterrestrial vortices. The largest extraterrestrial vortices are found on the gas giants, Jupiter and Saturn; and the ice giants, Uranus and Neptune.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exploration of Jupiter</span> Overview of the exploration of Jupiter the planet and its moons

The exploration of Jupiter has been conducted via close observations by automated spacecraft. It began with the arrival of Pioneer 10 into the Jovian system in 1973, and, as of 2023, has continued with eight further spacecraft missions in the vicinity of Jupiter. All of these missions were undertaken by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and all but two were flybys taking detailed observations without landing or entering orbit. These probes make Jupiter the most visited of the Solar System's outer planets as all missions to the outer Solar System have used Jupiter flybys. On 5 July 2016, spacecraft Juno arrived and entered the planet's orbit—the second craft ever to do so. Sending a craft to Jupiter is difficult, mostly due to large fuel requirements and the effects of the planet's harsh radiation environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Extraterrestrial atmosphere</span> Area of astronomical research

The study of extraterrestrial atmospheres is an active field of research, both as an aspect of astronomy and to gain insight into Earth's atmosphere. In addition to Earth, many of the other astronomical objects in the Solar System have atmospheres. These include all the giant planets, as well as Mars, Venus and Titan. Several moons and other bodies also have atmospheres, as do comets and the Sun. There is evidence that extrasolar planets can have an atmosphere. Comparisons of these atmospheres to one another and to Earth's atmosphere broaden our basic understanding of atmospheric processes such as the greenhouse effect, aerosol and cloud physics, and atmospheric chemistry and dynamics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neptune</span> Eighth planet from the Sun

Neptune is the eighth and farthest known planet from the Sun. It is the fourth-largest planet in the Solar System by diameter, the third-most-massive planet, and the densest giant planet. It is 17 times the mass of Earth and slightly more massive, but denser and smaller, than fellow ice giant Uranus. Being composed primarily of gases and liquids, it has no well-defined solid surface, and orbits the Sun once every 164.8 years at an orbital distance of 30.1 astronomical units. It is named after the Roman god of the sea and has the astronomical symbol , representing Neptune's trident.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exploration of Io</span> Overview of the exploration of Io, Jupiters innermost Galilean and third-largest moon

The exploration of Io, Jupiter's innermost Galilean and third-largest moon, began with its discovery in 1610 and continues today with Earth-based observations and visits by spacecraft to the Jupiter system. Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei was the first to record an observation of Io on January 8, 1610, though Simon Marius may have also observed Io at around the same time. During the 17th century, observations of Io and the other Galilean satellites helped with the measurement of longitude by map makers and surveyors, with validation of Kepler's Third Law of planetary motion, and with measurement of the speed of light. Based on ephemerides produced by astronomer Giovanni Cassini and others, Pierre-Simon Laplace created a mathematical theory to explain the resonant orbits of three of Jupiter's moons, Io, Europa, and Ganymede. This resonance was later found to have a profound effect on the geologies of these moons. Improved telescope technology in the late 19th and 20th centuries allowed astronomers to resolve large-scale surface features on Io as well as to estimate its diameter and mass.

The NASA International Planetary Patrol Program consists of a network of astronomical observatories to collect uninterrupted images and observations of the large-scale atmospheric and surface features of the planets. This group was established in 1969, and consisted of the Mauna Kea Observatory, the Mount Stromlo Observatory, the Perth Observatory, the Republic Observatory, the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, the Magdalena Peak Station of the New Mexico State University, and the Lowell Observatory. The activities were coordinated by William A. Baum of Lowell Observatory. In the years from 1975 to 1981 the San Vittore Observatory (Bologna) Italy also participated with observations of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn.

JunoCam is the visible-light camera/telescope onboard NASA's Juno spacecraft currently orbiting Jupiter. The camera is operated by the JunoCam Digital Electronics Assembly (JDEA). Both the camera and JDEA were built by Malin Space Science Systems. JunoCam takes a swath of imaging as the spacecraft rotates; the camera is fixed to the spacecraft, so as it rotates, it gets one sweep of observation. It has a field of view of 58 degrees with four filters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atmosphere of Jupiter</span> Layer of gases surrounding the planet Jupiter

The atmosphere of Jupiter is the largest planetary atmosphere in the Solar System. It is mostly made of molecular hydrogen and helium in roughly solar proportions; other chemical compounds are present only in small amounts and include methane, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and water. Although water is thought to reside deep in the atmosphere, its directly-measured concentration is very low. The nitrogen, sulfur, and noble gas abundances in Jupiter's atmosphere exceed solar values by a factor of about three.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jovian Infrared Auroral Mapper</span>

Jovian Infrared Auroral Mapper (JIRAM) is an instrument on the Juno spacecraft in orbit of the planet Jupiter. It is an image spectrometer and was contributed by Italy. Similar instruments are on ESA Rosetta, Venus Express, and Cassini-Huygens missions. The primary goal of JIRAM is to probe the upper layers of Jupiter's atmosphere down to pressures of 5–7 bars at infrared wavelengths in the 2–5 μm interval using an imager and a spectrometer. The Jupiter's atmosphere and auroral regions are targeted for study. In particular it has been designed to study the dynamics and chemistry in the atmosphere, perhaps determining the how Jovian hot spots form.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Saturn's hexagon</span> Hexagonal cloud pattern around north pole of Saturn

Saturn's hexagon is a persistent approximately hexagonal cloud pattern around the north pole of the planet Saturn, located at about 78°N. The sides of the hexagon are about 14,500 km (9,000 mi) long, which is about 2,000 km (1,200 mi) longer than the diameter of Earth. The hexagon may be a bit more than 29,000 km (18,000 mi) wide, may be 300 km (190 mi) high, and may be a jet stream made of atmospheric gases moving at 320 km/h (200 mph). It rotates with a period of 10h 39m 24s, the same period as Saturn's radio emissions from its interior. The hexagon does not shift in longitude like other clouds in the visible atmosphere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gas giant</span> Giant planet mainly composed of light elements

A gas giant is a giant planet composed mainly of hydrogen and helium. Jupiter and Saturn are the gas giants of the Solar System. The term "gas giant" was originally synonymous with "giant planet". However, in the 1990s, it became known that Uranus and Neptune are really a distinct class of giant planets, being composed mainly of heavier volatile substances. For this reason, Uranus and Neptune are now often classified in the separate category of ice giants.

Microwave Radiometer (<i>Juno</i>) Instrument observing deep into Jupiters atmosphere

Microwave Radiometer (MWR) is an instrument on the Juno orbiter sent to planet Jupiter. MWR is a multi-wavelength microwave radiometer for making observations of Jupiter's deep atmosphere. MWR can observe radiation from 1.37 to 50 cm in wavelength, from 600 MHz to 22 GHz in frequencies. This supports its goal of observing the previously unseen atmospheric features and chemical abundances hundreds of miles or kilometers into Jupiter's atmosphere. MWR is designed to detect six different frequencies in that range using separate antennas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amy Simon</span> American planetary scientist

Amy Simon is an American planetary scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, involved in several missions of the Solar System Exploration Program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impact events on Jupiter</span> Modern observed impacts on Jupiter

In modern times, numerous impact events on Jupiter have been observed, the most significant of which was the collision of Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 in 1994. Jupiter is the most massive planet in the Solar System and thus has a vast sphere of gravitational influence, the region of space where an asteroid capture can take place under favorable conditions.

References

  1. 1 2 Denning, William Frederick (June 1899). "Early history of the great red spot on Jupiter". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 59 (10). Royal Astronomical Society: 574. Bibcode:1899MNRAS..59..574D. doi: 10.1093/mnras/59.10.574 .
  2. ↑
  3. ↑
  4. 1 2 Sánchez-Lavega, Agustín; García-Melendo, Enrique; Legarreta, Jon; Miró, Arnau; Soria, Manel; Ahrens-Velásquez, Kevin (June 2024). "The Origin of Jupiter's Great Red Spot". Geophysical Research Letters . 51 (12). arXiv: 2406.13222 . Bibcode:2024GeoRL..5108993S. doi:10.1029/2024GL108993.
  5. ↑ Karl Hille (2015-08-04). "Jupiter's Great Red Spot: A Swirling Mystery". NASA. Retrieved 2017-11-18.
  6. 1 2 Beebe (1997), 38-41.
  7. ↑ "This Month in Physics History". www.aps.org. Retrieved 2021-12-29.
  8. ↑ Rogers (1995), 6.
  9. ↑ Rogers (1995), 188.
  10. ↑ Staff (2003). "Donato Creti, Astronomical observations". Muha m jaadugar sei Vaticani. Vatican Museums. Retrieved 2019-12-16.
  11. 1 2 Hockey (1999), 40-1.
  12. ↑ Smith et al (1979), 951-972.
  13. ↑ Beatty, J. Kelly (2002). "Jupiter's Shrinking Red Spot". Sky and Telescope. 103 (4): 24. Bibcode:2002S&T...103d..24B. Archived from the original on 2011-05-27. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
  14. ↑ Paul Scott Anderson (10 June 2019). "Is Jupiter's Great Red Spot disintegrating?". EarthSky. Retrieved 2 July 2019.
  15. ↑ Urrutia, Doris Elin (21 February 2018). "Jupiter's Great Red Spot Could Disappear Within 20 Years". Space.com . Retrieved 30 April 2023.
  16. ↑ Philip Marcus (26 November 2019). "Jupiter's Great Red Spot may not be disappearing". Astronomy. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
  17. ↑ Sanchez-Lavega, A.; et al. (February 2001). "The Merger of Two Giant Anticyclones in the Atmosphere of Jupiter". Icarus . 149 (2): 491–495. Bibcode:2001Icar..149..491S. doi:10.1006/icar.2000.6548.
  18. ↑ Phillips, Tony. "Huge Storms Converge". Science@NASA. Archived from the original on 2007-02-02. Retrieved 2007-01-08.
  19. ↑ Michaud, Peter. "Gemini Captures Close Encounter of Jupiter's Red Spots". Gemini Observatory. Retrieved 2007-06-15.
  20. ↑ Shiga, David. "Third red spot erupts on Jupiter". New Scientist. Retrieved 2008-05-23.
  21. 1 2 3 Perez, Martin (2017-07-12). "NASA's Juno Spacecraft Spots Jupiter's Great Red Spot". NASA. Archived from the original on 2017-07-15. Retrieved 2017-07-16.
  22. ↑ Chang, Kenneth (2016-07-05). "NASA's Juno Spacecraft Enters Into Orbit Around Jupiter". The New York Times . Retrieved 2017-07-12.
  23. ↑ Phillips, Tony. "The Great Dark Spot". Science at NASA. Archived from the original on 2007-06-15. Retrieved 2007-06-20.
  24. ↑ Rogers, John (2008). "The accelerating circulation of Jupiter's Great Red Spot". Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 118 (1): 14–20. Bibcode:2008JBAA..118...14R . Retrieved 2022-08-28.
  25. ↑ The Voyager Mission: Jupiter, the Giant of the Solar System. NASA. 1979. p. 5.
  26. ↑ "Jupiter's Atmosphere and Great Red Spot". www.astrophysicsspectator.com. November 24, 2004.
  27. ↑ Rogers (1995), 191.
  28. 1 2 O'Donoghue, J.; Moore, L.; Stallard, T. S.; Melin, H. (27 July 2016). "Heating of Jupiter's upper atmosphere above the Great Red Spot". Nature. 536 (7615): 190–192. Bibcode:2016Natur.536..190O. doi:10.1038/nature18940. hdl: 2381/38554 . PMID   27462811. S2CID   4462322.
  29. ↑ "Jupiter's Great Red Spot Likely a Massive Heat Source". NASA. 27 July 2016. Archived from the original on 12 June 2019. Retrieved 23 December 2018.
  30. ↑ Rogers (1995), 194-6.
  31. ↑ Beebe (1997), 35.
  32. ↑ Rogers (1995), 195.
  33. ↑ Rogers, John. "Interim reports on STB (Oval BA passing GRS), STropB, GRS (internal rotation measured), EZ(S. Eq. Disturbance; dramatic darkening; NEB interactions), & NNTB". British Astronomical Association. Retrieved 2007-06-15.
  34. ↑
  35. ↑ Trigo-Rodriguez, J.M; Sánchez-Lavega, A; Gómez, J.M; Lecacheux, J; Colas, F; Miyazaki, I (2000). "The 90-day oscillations of Jupiter's Great Red Spot revisited". Planetary and Space Science. 48 (4): 331–339. Bibcode:2000P&SS...48..331T. doi:10.1016/S0032-0633(00)00002-7. S2CID   120883365.
  36. ↑
  37. ↑ Rogers (1995), 193.
  38. ↑ Wong, Michael H.; Simon, Amy A.; Tollefson, Joshua W.; de Pater, Imke; Barnett, Megan N.; Hsu, Andrew I.; Stephens, Andrew W.; Orton, Glenn S.; Fleming, Scott W.; Goullaud, Charles; Januszewski, William; Roman, Anthony; Bjoraker, Gordon L.; Atreya, Sushil K.; Adriani, Alberto; Fletcher, Leigh N. (1 April 2020). "High-resolution UV/Optical/IR Imaging of Jupiter in 2016–2019". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 247 (2): 58. Bibcode:2020ApJS..247...58W. doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab775f .
  39. 1 2 3 4 Bjoraker, G. L.; Wong, M. H.; Pater, I. de; Hewagama, T.; Ádámkovics, M.; Orton, G. S. (2018-08-20). "The Gas Composition and Deep Cloud Structure of Jupiter's Great Red Spot". The Astronomical Journal. 156 (3): 101. arXiv: 1808.01402 . Bibcode:2018AJ....156..101B. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad186 . ISSN   1538-3881. S2CID   119365729.
  40. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Parisi, Marzia; Kaspi, Yohai; Galanti, Eli; Durante, Daniele; Bolton, Scott J.; Levin, Steven M.; Buccino, Dustin R.; Fletcher, Leigh N.; Folkner, William M.; Guillot, Tristan; Helled, Ravit (2021-11-19). "The depth of Jupiter's Great Red Spot constrained by Juno gravity overflights". Science. 374 (6570): 964–968. Bibcode:2021Sci...374..964P. doi:10.1126/science.abf1396. hdl: 11573/1605351 . ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   34709940. S2CID   240153766.
  41. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Fletcher, Leigh N.; Orton, G. S.; Mousis, O.; Yanamandra-Fisher, P.; Parrish, P. D.; Irwin, P. G. J.; Fisher, B. M.; Vanzi, L.; Fujiyoshi, T.; Fuse, T.; Simon-Miller, A. A. (2010-07-01). "Thermal structure and composition of Jupiter's Great Red Spot from high-resolution thermal imaging". Icarus. 208 (1): 306–328. Bibcode:2010Icar..208..306F. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.01.005. ISSN   0019-1035.
  42. 1 2 Choi, David S.; Banfield, Don; Gierasch, Peter; Showman, Adam P. (2007-05-01). "Velocity and vorticity measurements of Jupiter's Great Red Spot using automated cloud feature tracking". Icarus. 188 (1): 35–46. arXiv: 1301.6119 . Bibcode:2007Icar..188...35C. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.10.037. ISSN   0019-1035. S2CID   55114257.
  43. ↑ Sánchez-Lavega, A.; Hueso, R.; Eichstädt, G.; Orton, G.; Rogers, J.; Hansen, C. J.; Momary, T.; Tabataba-Vakili, F.; Bolton, S. (2018-09-18). "The Rich Dynamics of Jupiter's Great Red Spot from JunoCam: Juno Images". The Astronomical Journal. 156 (4): 162. Bibcode:2018AJ....156..162S. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aada81 . ISSN   1538-3881. S2CID   125185665.
  44. ↑ Wong, Michael H.; Marcus, Philip S.; Simon, Amy A.; de Pater, Imke; Tollefson, Joshua W.; Asay-Davis, Xylar (28 September 2021). "Evolution of the Horizontal Winds in Jupiter's Great Red Spot From One Jovian Year of HST/WFC3 Maps". Geophysical Research Letters. 48 (18). Bibcode:2021GeoRL..4893982W. doi:10.1029/2021GL093982.
  45. ↑ Simon, Amy A.; Tabataba-Vakili, Fachreddin; Cosentino, Richard; Beebe, Reta F.; Wong, Michael H.; Orton, Glenn S. (2018-03-13). "Historical and Contemporary Trends in the Size, Drift, and Color of Jupiter's Great Red Spot". The Astronomical Journal. 155 (4): 151. Bibcode:2018AJ....155..151S. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaae01 . ISSN   1538-3881. S2CID   126147959.
  46. ↑ Cho, James Y-K.; de la Torre Juárez, Manuel; Ingersoll, Andrew P.; Dritschel, David G. (2001-03-25). "A high-resolution, three-dimensional model of Jupiter's Great Red Spot". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 106 (E3): 5099–5105. Bibcode:2001JGR...106.5099C. doi: 10.1029/2000JE001287 .
  47. ↑ Morales-Juberías, Raúl; Dowling, Timothy E. (2013-07-01). "Jupiter's Great Red Spot: Fine-scale matches of model vorticity patterns to prevailing cloud patterns". Icarus. 225 (1): 216–227. Bibcode:2013Icar..225..216M. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.03.026. ISSN   0019-1035.
  48. ↑ Flasar, F. Michael; Conrath, Barney J.; Pirraglia, Joseph A.; Clark, Patrick C.; French, Richard G.; Gierasch, Peter J. (1981-09-30). "Thermal structure and dynamics of the Jovian atmosphere 1. The great red spot". Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 86 (A10): 8759–8767. Bibcode:1981JGR....86.8759F. doi:10.1029/JA086iA10p08759. hdl: 2060/19810016481 .
  49. ↑ "Jupiter's Great Red Spot: A Swirling Mystery". NASA. August 4, 2015. Goddard scientists Mark Loeffler and Reggie Hudson have been performing laboratory studies to investigate whether cosmic rays, one type of radiation that strikes Jupiter's clouds, can chemically alter ammonium hydrosulfide to produce new compounds that could explain the spot's color.
  50. ↑ Loeffer, Mark J.; Hudson, Reggie L. (2018). "Coloring Jupiter's clouds: Radiolysis of ammonium hydrosulfide (NH4SH)". Icarus. 302: 418–425. Bibcode:2018Icar..302..418L. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.10.041.
  51. ↑ "What makes Jupiter's Red Spot red?". EarthSky. 2014-11-11. Retrieved 2019-03-13.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.