How Democracies Die

Last updated

How Democracies Die
How Democracies Die.jpg
First paperback edition
Authors Steven Levitsky, Daniel Ziblatt
Cover artistChristopher Brand
CountryUnited States
Language English
Subjects Politics
Political theory
Comparative politics
Political science
PublisherCrown (publisher)
Publication date
16 January 2018 (2018-01-16)
Media typePrint (hardcover, paperback, e-book, audio book)
Pages320
ISBN 978-1-5247-6293-3
OCLC 1082520793
321.8
LC Class JC423 .L4855

How Democracies Die is a 2018 comparative politics book by Harvard University political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt about democratic backsliding and how elected leaders can gradually subvert the democratic process to increase their power. The book also offers stark warnings about the impact of the Republican Party and Donald Trump's presidency on U.S. democracy.

Contents

The Economist praised it as arguably the most important book of the Trump era.

Synopsis

The book warns against the breakdown of "mutual toleration" and respect for the political legitimacy of the opposition. This tolerance involves accepting the results of a free and fair election where the opposition has won, in contrast with advocacy for overthrow or spurious complaints about the election mechanism. The authors also assert the importance of respecting the opinions of those who come to legitimately different political opinions, in contrast to attacking the patriotism of any who disagree, or warning that if they come to power they will destroy the country.

The authors cite the various branches of government in a system with separation of powers have actions available to them that could completely undermine the other branches or the opposition. The authors warn against ramming through a political agenda or accumulating power by playing "constitutional hardball" with tactics like court packing, stonewalling nominations, or abusing the power of the purse, and recommend "forbearance" and some degree of cooperation to keep government functioning in a balanced fashion. Other threats to democratic stability cited by the authors include economic inequality and segregation of the political parties by race, religion, and geography.

The authors dedicate many chapters to the study of the United States, Donald Trump, and the 2016 U.S. presidential election but also apply their theory to Latin America and European countries, especially Venezuela and Russia. According to them, the United States has, until 2016, resisted the attempts to undermine democracy thanks to two norms: mutual toleration and forbearance, the latter defined as the intentional restraint of one's power in order to respect the spirit of the law if not its letters. They finally predict three potential scenarios for the post-Trump United States.

Analysis

Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, Harvard professors and political scientists, study the prospect of the democratic system in an holistic approach, and take a critical stand of the Trump presidency. They describe their work as a study of how democracies die. The main subjects are drawn in the introduction: the authors argue that in our time, democracies still die but by different means, "less at the hand of men with guns and more by elected leaders". The methodology used is mainly based on the "comparative method" and it is a book that tries to "reveal about our future" based on history, more specifically on historical comparisons (finding similar dynamics, presenting models of "gatekeeping" and the "rhymes" of history). The object of the study is the president Trump as an "autocrat in becoming" and, a comparison with state failures and autocrats. The study assesses the risk of his presidency and tries to identify the pattern of autocratic tendencies.

Recommendations of the authors

Levitsky and Ziblatt accept the fear of the Trump presidency as legitimate and pledge for the protection of the democracy. Particularly the last chapter saving democracy, put emphasis on political recommendations to save democracy in a pledge: "We must be humble and bold. We must learn from other countries to see the warning signs. We must be aware of the fateful missteps that have wrecked other democracies. We must see how citizens have risen to meet the great democratic crisis of the past." [1] A proposed solution to the crisis is that "[w]e must not only restore democratic norms but extend them through the whole of increasingly diverse societies. This is a daunting challenge ... this is the challenge we face, previous generations ... made extraordinary sacrifice ... we must prevent it from dying from within ... ." [2]

They make recommendations for the Republicans, who "must build a more diverse electoral constituency and they must find ways to win elections without appealing to white nationalism, the sugar high of populism, nativism, and demagoguery", [3] and who has to "realize that the president could inflict real damage on our institutions in the long term." [4] About Democrats, they write: "Although the Democratic party has not been the principal driver of America deepening polarization it could play a role in reducing it." [5] They say that "Democrats could consider more comprehensive labor market policies ... it is imperative that Democrats address the issue of inequality." [6]

In an interview, Levitsky identifies two objectives of the book: one is defeating Trump and the other is shoring up our democracy. [7] Finally, they suggest that the effect of the Trump presidency could be a mild form of competitive authoritarianism. [8]

Reception

In 2021, The Economist described it as arguably the most important book of the Trump era. [9] The New York Times called it an essential guide to what can happen in the United States. [10] The Washington Post said the book offers a sober look at the current state of affairs. [11] Jason Willick in The Wall Street Journal called it an unintentional clarifying lesson. [12] David Runciman in The Guardian called it provocative but puts too much emphasis on lessons from history instead of forces like social media and inequality. [13] John Ikenberry in Foreign Affairs called it a powerful wake-up call. [14] Fair Observer[ better source needed ] called it an original contribution valuable to researchers, policy makers, and citizens. [15]

Columbia University historian Adam Tooze described the book as the "most thought-provoking book comparing democratic crises in different nations". [16] Barack Obama listed the book on his "Favorite Books of 2018" list. [17] In a scholarly review, political theorist Rosolino A. Candela praised the work and concluded that academics will find "much to learn, unpack, and develop". [18]

The book was on The New York Times Bestseller list. [19] The book was awarded with the German NDR Kultur Sachbuchpreis 2018. [20]

Joe Biden read the book in 2018, sometimes carrying it with him that year to share passages. [21] [22]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratization</span> Society becoming more democratic

Democratization, or democratisation, is the democratic transition to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction.

An illiberal democracy describes a governing system that hides its "nondemocratic practices behind formally democratic institutions and procedures". There is a lack of consensus among experts about the exact definition of illiberal democracy or whether it even exists.

<i>The Spirit of Law</i> Book by Montesquieu

The Spirit of Law, also known in English as The Spirit of [the] Laws, is a treatise on political theory, as well as a pioneering work in comparative law by Montesquieu, published in 1748. Originally published anonymously, as was the norm, its influence outside France was aided by its rapid translation into other languages. In 1750 Thomas Nugent published an English translation, many times revised and reprinted in countless editions. In 1751 the Roman Catholic Church added De l'esprit des lois to its Index Librorum Prohibitorum.

Social disruption is a term used in sociology to describe the alteration, dysfunction or breakdown of social life, often in a community setting. Social disruption implies a radical transformation, in which the old certainties of modern society are falling away and something quite new is emerging. Social disruption might be caused through natural disasters, massive human displacements, rapid economic, technological and demographic change but also due to controversial policy-making.

The Goldsmith Book Prize is a literary award for books published in the United States.

Liberal internationalism is a foreign policy doctrine that supports international institutions, open markets, cooperative security and liberal democracy. At its core, it holds that states should participate in international institutions that uphold rules-based norms, promote liberal democracy and facilitate cooperation on transnational problems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Steven Levitsky</span> American political scientist known for work on democracy

Steven Levitsky is an American political scientist and Professor of Government at Harvard University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel W. Drezner</span> American journalist

Daniel W. Drezner is an American political scientist. He is known for his scholarship and commentary on International Relations and International Political Economy.

Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the rejection of democracy and political plurality. It involves the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government. Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have some times been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.

A hybrid regime is a type of political system often created as a result of an incomplete democratic transition from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one. Hybrid regimes are categorized as having a combination of autocratic features with democratic ones and can simultaneously hold political repressions and regular elections. Hybrid regimes are commonly found in developing countries with abundant natural resources such as petro-states. Although these regimes experience civil unrest, they may be relatively stable and tenacious for decades at a time. There has been a rise in hybrid regimes since the end of the Cold War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratic backsliding</span> A country becoming less democratic

Democratic backsliding is a process of regime change towards autocracy that makes the exercise of political power by the public more arbitrary and repressive. This process typically restricts the space for public contestation and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic decline involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.

Founded in 1994 by then-President Neil L. Rudenstine and alumnus David Rockefeller, the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies (DRCLAS) is an inter-faculty initiative of Harvard University, with offices in Cambridge, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. DRCLAS works to increase the knowledge of the cultures, economies, histories, environment and contemporary affairs of Latin America; foster cooperation and understanding among the peoples of the Americas; and contribute to democracy, social progress and sustainable development throughout the hemisphere. Through programs, grants, fellowships, and activities, DRCLAS strives to provide support and resources for students, faculty, and scholars working in and on Latin America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel Ziblatt</span> American political scientist

Daniel Ziblatt is an American political scientist who has been Eaton Professor of the Science of Government at Harvard University since 2018.

Constitutional hardball is the exploitation of procedures, laws and institutions by political actors for partisan gain in ways which violate pre-established norms and push the bounds of legality. Legal scholars and political scientists have characterized constitutional hardball as a threat to democracy, because it undermines shared understanding of democratic norms and undermines the expectation that the other side will comply with democratic norms. As a result, the use of constitutional hardball by one side of partisans encourages other partisans to respond in similar fashion.

The V-Dem Institute is founded by Professor Staffan I. Lindberg in 2014 that studies the qualities of government. The headquarters of the project is based at the department of political science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

<i>Twilight of Democracy</i> 2020 book by Anne Applebaum

Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism is a 2020 book by Anne Applebaum that discusses democratic decline and the rise of right-wing populist politics with authoritarian tendencies, with three main case studies: Poland, the United Kingdom and the United States. The book also includes a discussion of Hungary.

<i>Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy</i> 2017 non-fiction book by Daniel Ziblatt

Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy is a 2017 non-fiction book by Daniel Ziblatt, published by Cambridge University Press, discussing the growth of democratic countries in 19th and 20th century Europe. Ziblatt's thesis is that in those democracies the conservative parties were often crucial on whether a democracy survives: he analysed both Germany and the United Kingdom. Ziblatt argued that if conservative parties were robust they would assist democracy but if they had weaknesses they would impede democracy.

Protect Democracy is a nonprofit organization based in the United States. A nonpartisan group, Protect Democracy seeks to check what it believes are authoritarian attacks on U.S. democracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratic backsliding by country</span>

Democratic backsliding, also known as autocratization, is the decline in democratic qualities of a political regime, the opposite of democratization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratic backsliding in the United States</span> Periods of democratic decline in the U.S.

Democratic backsliding in the United States has been identified as a trend at the state and national levels in various indices and analyses. Democratic backsliding is "a process of regime change towards autocracy that makes the exercise of political power more arbitrary and repressive and that restricts the space for public contestation and political participation in the process of government selection".

References

  1. Levitsky & Ziblatt 2018, p. 10.
  2. Levitsky & Ziblatt 2018, p. 231.
  3. Levitsky & Ziblatt 2018, p. 223.
  4. Levitsky & Ziblatt 2018, p. 189.
  5. Levitsky & Ziblatt 2018, p. 226.
  6. Levitsky & Ziblatt 2018, p. 229.
  7. Chotiner, Isaac (2018). "The State of American Democracy After a year of Trump, how worried should we be?". Slate.
  8. Levitsky, Steven; Way, Lucan A. (April 2002). "Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism" (PDF). Journal of Democracy. 13 (2 April). Retrieved 3 October 2023 via Harvard University.
  9. "The terrible scenes on Capitol Hill illustrate how Donald Trump has changed his party". The Economist. 9 January 2021. ISSN   0013-0613 . Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  10. Kristof, Nicholas (10 January 2018). "Trump's Threat to Democracy". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 10 January 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  11. Caryl, Christian (11 January 2018). "Can American democracy withstand its latest assault?". The Washington Post .
  12. Willick, Jason (24 January 2018). "Review: Polarized Societies and 'How Democracies Die'". Wall Street Journal .
  13. Runciman, David (24 January 2018). "How Democracies Die review – Trump and the shredding of norms". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  14. Ikenberry 2018.
  15. Kolasa, Matthew (15 August 2018). "How Democracies Die Around the World". Fair Observer . Retrieved 16 August 2018.
  16. Tooze, Adam (6 June 2019). "Democracy and Its Discontents". New York Review of Books. ISSN   0028-7504 . Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  17. Alfaro, Mariana. "Obama says these were his 29 favorite books of 2018". Business Insider. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  18. Candela, Rosolino A. (2018). "Book review - How Democracies Die". The Independent Review . 23 (2). Retrieved 27 August 2019.
  19. "Combined Print & E-Book Nonfiction Books - Best Sellers - February 25, 2018 - The New York Times". The New York Times . 25 February 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  20. "Levitsky und Ziblatt erhalten Sachbuchpreis 2018". NDR.de (in German). 12 November 2018. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
  21. "Weightlifting, Gatorade, birthday calls: Inside Biden's day". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 25 May 2021.
  22. Osnos, Evan. "Can Biden's Center Hold?". The New Yorker. Retrieved 25 May 2021.

Bibliography