Inertia coupling

Last updated

In aeronautics, inertia coupling, [1] also referred to as inertial coupling [2] and inertial roll coupling, [3] is a potentially catastrophic phenomenon of high-speed flight in a long, thin aircraft, in which an intentional rotation of the aircraft about one axis prevents the aircraft's design from inhibiting other unintended rotations. [2] The problem became apparent in the 1950s, when the first supersonic jet fighter aircraft and research aircraft were developed with narrow wingspans, and caused the loss of aircraft and pilots before the design features to counter it (e.g. a big enough fin) were understood. [4]

Contents

The term "inertia/inertial coupling" has been criticized as misleading, because the phenomenon is not solely an instability of inertial movement, like the Janibekov effect. Instead, the phenomenon arises because aerodynamic forces react too slowly to track an aircraft's orientation. [4] [5] At low speeds and thick air, aerodynamic forces match aircraft translational velocity to orientation, avoiding the dangerous dynamical regime. But at high speeds or thin air, the wing and empennage may not generate sufficient forces and moments to stabilize the aircraft. [4]

Description

Inertia coupling tends to occur in aircraft with a long, slender, high-density fuselage. A simple, yet accurate mental model describing the aircraft's mass distribution is a rhombus of point masses: one large mass fore and aft, and a small one on each wing. The inertia tensor that this distribution generates has a large yaw component and small pitch and roll components, with the pitch component slightly larger. [6]

Euler's equations govern the rotation of an aircraft. When ωr, the angular rate of roll, is controlled by the aircraft, then the other rotations must satisfy

where y, p, and r indicate yaw, pitch, and roll; I is the moment of inertia along an axis; T the external torque from aerodynamic forces along an axis; and dots indicate time derivatives. [7] [8] When aerodynamic forces are absent, this 2variable system is the equation of a simple harmonic oscillator with frequency (1-Ir/Ip)(1-Ir/Iy)ω2
r
: a rolling Space Shuttle will naturally undergo small oscillations in pitch and yaw. Conversely, when the craft does not roll at all (ωr=0), the only terms on the right-hand side are the aerodynamic torques, which are (at small angles) proportional to the craft's angular orientation θ to the freestream air. That is: there are natural constants k such that an unrolling aircraft experiences [7] [9]

In the full case of a rolling aircraft, the connection between orientation and angular velocity is not entirely straightforward, because the aircraft is a rotating reference frame. The roll inherently exchanges yaw for pitch and vice-versa:

Assuming nonzero roll, time can always be rescaled so that ωr=1. The full equations of the body are then of two damped, coupled harmonic oscillators:

where

But if kJ in either axis, then the damping is eliminated and the system is unstable. [10] [11] In dimensional terms (that is, unscaled time), instability requires kJωr. Since Ir is small,

In particular, one J is at least 1. In thick air, k are too large to matter. But in thin air and supersonic speeds, they decrease, and may become comparable to ωr during a rapid roll. [12]

Techniques to prevent inertial roll coupling include increased directional stability (k) and reduced roll rate (ωr). Alternatively, the unstable aircraft dynamics may be mitigated: the unstable modes require time to grow, and a sufficiently short-duration roll at limited angle of attack may allow recovery to a controlled state post-roll. [13]

Early history

In 1948, William Phillips described inertial roll coupling in the context of missiles in an NACA report. [12] However, his predictions appeared primarily theoretical in the case of planes. [14] The violent motions he predicted were first seen in the X-series research aircraft and Century-series fighter aircraft in the early 1950s. Before this time, aircraft tended to have greater width than length, and their mass was generally distributed closer to the center of mass. This was especially true for propeller aircraft, but equally true for early jet fighters as well. The effect became obvious only when aircraft began to sacrifice aerodynamic surface area to reduce drag, and use longer fineness ratios to reduce supersonic drag. Such aircraft were generally much more fuselage-heavy, allowing gyroscopic effects to overwhelm the small control surfaces.

The roll coupling study of the X-3 Stiletto, first flown in 1952, was extremely short but produced valuable data. Abrupt aileron rolls were conducted at Mach 0.92 and 1.05 and produced "disturbing" motions and excessive accelerations and loads. [15]

In 1953, inertial roll coupling nearly killed Chuck Yeager in the X-1A. [16]

Inertial roll coupling was one of three distinct coupling modes that followed one another as the rocket-powered Bell X-2 hit Mach 3.2 during a flight on 27 September 1956, killing pilot Captain Mel Apt. Although simulators had predicted that Apt's maneuvers would produce an uncontrollable flight regime, at the time most pilots did not believe that the simulators accurately modeled the plane's flight characteristics. [17]

The first two production aircraft to experience inertial roll coupling were the F-100 Super Sabre and F-102 Delta Dagger (both first flown in 1953). The F-100 was modified with a larger vertical tail to increase its directional stability. [18] The F-102 was modified to increase wing and tail areas and was fitted with an augmented control system. To enable pilot control during dynamic motion maneuvers the tail area of the F-102A was increased 40%.

In the case of the F-101 Voodoo (first flown in 1954), a stability augmentation system was retrofitted to the A models to help combat this problem.

The Douglas Skyray was not able to incorporate any design changes to control inertial roll coupling and instead had restricted maneuver limits at which coupling effects did not cause problems. [19]

The Lockheed F-104 Starfighter (first flown in 1956) had its stabilator (horizontal tail surface) mounted atop its vertical fin to reduce inertia coupling.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Angular momentum</span> Conserved physical quantity; rotational analogue of linear momentum

In physics, angular momentum is the rotational analog of linear momentum. It is an important physical quantity because it is a conserved quantity – the total angular momentum of a closed system remains constant. Angular momentum has both a direction and a magnitude, and both are conserved. Bicycles and motorcycles, flying discs, rifled bullets, and gyroscopes owe their useful properties to conservation of angular momentum. Conservation of angular momentum is also why hurricanes form spirals and neutron stars have high rotational rates. In general, conservation limits the possible motion of a system, but it does not uniquely determine it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polar coordinate system</span> Coordinates comprising a distance and an angle

In mathematics, the polar coordinate system is a two-dimensional coordinate system in which each point on a plane is determined by a distance from a reference point and an angle from a reference direction. The reference point is called the pole, and the ray from the pole in the reference direction is the polar axis. The distance from the pole is called the radial coordinate, radial distance or simply radius, and the angle is called the angular coordinate, polar angle, or azimuth. Angles in polar notation are generally expressed in either degrees or radians.

A Costas loop is a phase-locked loop (PLL) based circuit which is used for carrier frequency recovery from suppressed-carrier modulation signals and phase modulation signals. It was invented by John P. Costas at General Electric in the 1950s. Its invention was described as having had "a profound effect on modern digital communications". The primary application of Costas loops is in wireless receivers. Its advantage over other PLL-based detectors is that at small deviations the Costas loop error voltage is as compared to . This translates to double the sensitivity and also makes the Costas loop uniquely suited for tracking Doppler-shifted carriers, especially in OFDM and GPS receivers.

Kinematics is a subfield of physics and mathematics, developed in classical mechanics, that describes the motion of points, bodies (objects), and systems of bodies without considering the forces that cause them to move. Kinematics, as a field of study, is often referred to as the "geometry of motion" and is occasionally seen as a branch of both applied and pure mathematics since it can be studied without considering the mass of a body or the forces acting upon it. A kinematics problem begins by describing the geometry of the system and declaring the initial conditions of any known values of position, velocity and/or acceleration of points within the system. Then, using arguments from geometry, the position, velocity and acceleration of any unknown parts of the system can be determined. The study of how forces act on bodies falls within kinetics, not kinematics. For further details, see analytical dynamics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aircraft flight dynamics</span> Science of air vehicle orientation and control in three dimensions

Flight dynamics is the science of air vehicle orientation and control in three dimensions. The three critical flight dynamics parameters are the angles of rotation in three dimensions about the vehicle's center of gravity (cg), known as pitch, roll and yaw. These are collectively known as aircraft attitude, often principally relative to the atmospheric frame in normal flight, but also relative to terrain during takeoff or landing, or when operating at low elevation. The concept of attitude is not specific to fixed-wing aircraft, but also extends to rotary aircraft such as helicopters, and dirigibles, where the flight dynamics involved in establishing and controlling attitude are entirely different.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inverted pendulum</span> Pendulum with center of mass above pivot

An inverted pendulum is a pendulum that has its center of mass above its pivot point. It is unstable and falls over without additional help. It can be suspended stably in this inverted position by using a control system to monitor the angle of the pole and move the pivot point horizontally back under the center of mass when it starts to fall over, keeping it balanced. The inverted pendulum is a classic problem in dynamics and control theory and is used as a benchmark for testing control strategies. It is often implemented with the pivot point mounted on a cart that can move horizontally under control of an electronic servo system as shown in the photo; this is called a cart and pole apparatus. Most applications limit the pendulum to 1 degree of freedom by affixing the pole to an axis of rotation. Whereas a normal pendulum is stable when hanging downward, an inverted pendulum is inherently unstable, and must be actively balanced in order to remain upright; this can be done either by applying a torque at the pivot point, by moving the pivot point horizontally as part of a feedback system, changing the rate of rotation of a mass mounted on the pendulum on an axis parallel to the pivot axis and thereby generating a net torque on the pendulum, or by oscillating the pivot point vertically. A simple demonstration of moving the pivot point in a feedback system is achieved by balancing an upturned broomstick on the end of one's finger.

In control theory and signal processing, a linear, time-invariant system is said to be minimum-phase if the system and its inverse are causal and stable.

In physics, circular motion is a movement of an object along the circumference of a circle or rotation along a circular arc. It can be uniform, with a constant rate of rotation and constant tangential speed, or non-uniform with a changing rate of rotation. The rotation around a fixed axis of a three-dimensional body involves the circular motion of its parts. The equations of motion describe the movement of the center of mass of a body, which remains at a constant distance from the axis of rotation. In circular motion, the distance between the body and a fixed point on its surface remains the same, i.e., the body is assumed rigid.

In physics and astronomy, the Reissner–Nordström metric is a static solution to the Einstein–Maxwell field equations, which corresponds to the gravitational field of a charged, non-rotating, spherically symmetric body of mass M. The analogous solution for a charged, rotating body is given by the Kerr–Newman metric.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rotating reference frame</span> Concept in classical mechanics

A rotating frame of reference is a special case of a non-inertial reference frame that is rotating relative to an inertial reference frame. An everyday example of a rotating reference frame is the surface of the Earth.

In rotordynamics, the rigid rotor is a mechanical model of rotating systems. An arbitrary rigid rotor is a 3-dimensional rigid object, such as a top. To orient such an object in space requires three angles, known as Euler angles. A special rigid rotor is the linear rotor requiring only two angles to describe, for example of a diatomic molecule. More general molecules are 3-dimensional, such as water, ammonia, or methane.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spacecraft flight dynamics</span> Application of mechanical dynamics to model the flight of space vehicles

Spacecraft flight dynamics is the application of mechanical dynamics to model how the external forces acting on a space vehicle or spacecraft determine its flight path. These forces are primarily of three types: propulsive force provided by the vehicle's engines; gravitational force exerted by the Earth and other celestial bodies; and aerodynamic lift and drag.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hopf bifurcation</span> Critical point where a periodic solution arises

In the mathematical theory of bifurcations, a Hopfbifurcation is a critical point where, as a parameter changes, a system's stability switches and a periodic solution arises. More accurately, it is a local bifurcation in which a fixed point of a dynamical system loses stability, as a pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues—of the linearization around the fixed point—crosses the complex plane imaginary axis as a parameter crosses a threshold value. Under reasonably generic assumptions about the dynamical system, the fixed point becomes a small-amplitude limit cycle as the parameter changes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Torsion tensor</span> Manner of characterizing a twist or screw of a moving frame around a curve

In differential geometry, the torsion tensor is a tensor that is associated to any affine connection. The torsion tensor is bilinear map of two input vectors , that produces an output vector representing the displacement within a tangent space when the tangent space is developed along an infinitesimal parallelogram whose sides are . It is skew symmetric in its inputs, because developing over the parallelogram in the opposite sense produces the opposite displacement, similarly to how a screw moves in opposite ways when it is twisted in two directions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hunting oscillation</span> Self-oscillation about an equilibrium that is usually unwanted

Hunting oscillation is a self-oscillation, usually unwanted, about an equilibrium. The expression came into use in the 19th century and describes how a system "hunts" for equilibrium. The expression is used to describe phenomena in such diverse fields as electronics, aviation, biology, and railway engineering.

Directional stability is stability of a moving body or vehicle about an axis which is perpendicular to its direction of motion. Stability of a vehicle concerns itself with the tendency of a vehicle to return to its original direction in relation to the oncoming medium when disturbed (rotated) away from that original direction. If a vehicle is directionally stable, a restoring moment is produced which is in a direction opposite to the rotational disturbance. This "pushes" the vehicle so as to return it to the original orientation, thus tending to keep the vehicle oriented in the original direction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Perifocal coordinate system</span> Frame of reference for an orbit

The perifocal coordinate (PQW) system is a frame of reference for an orbit. The frame is centered at the focus of the orbit, i.e. the celestial body about which the orbit is centered. The unit vectors and lie in the plane of the orbit. is directed towards the periapsis of the orbit and has a true anomaly of 90 degrees past the periapsis. The third unit vector is the angular momentum vector and is directed orthogonal to the orbital plane such that:

In geometry, various formalisms exist to express a rotation in three dimensions as a mathematical transformation. In physics, this concept is applied to classical mechanics where rotational kinematics is the science of quantitative description of a purely rotational motion. The orientation of an object at a given instant is described with the same tools, as it is defined as an imaginary rotation from a reference placement in space, rather than an actually observed rotation from a previous placement in space.

The Routh array is a tabular method permitting one to establish the stability of a system using only the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial. Central to the field of control systems design, the Routh–Hurwitz theorem and Routh array emerge by using the Euclidean algorithm and Sturm's theorem in evaluating Cauchy indices.

Mechanics of planar particle motion is the analysis of the motion of particles gravitationally attracted to one another observed from non-inertial reference frames and the generalisation of this problem to planetary motion. This type of analysis is closely related to centrifugal force, two-body problem, orbit and Kepler's laws of planetary motion. The mechanics of planar particle motion fall in the general field of analytical dynamics, and helps determine orbits from the given force laws. This article is focused more on the kinematic issues surrounding planar motion, which are the determination of the forces necessary to result in a certain trajectory given the particle trajectory.

References

  1. Flightwise - Volume 2, Aircraft Stability and Control, Christopher Carpenter 1997, Airlife Publishing Ltd., ISBN   1 85310 870 7, p.336
  2. 1 2 Airplane Stability and Control - Second edition, Abzug and Larrabee, Cambridge University Press, ISBN   0-521-02128-6, p.109
  3. Day, Richard E. (1997). Coupling Dynamics in Aircraft: A Historical Perspective (PDF) (Technical report). Edwards, California: NASA Office of Management Scientific and Technological Information Program. p. 2. Special publication 532. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 Feb 2005. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
  4. 1 2 3 Hurt, H. H. Jr. (January 1965) [1960]. Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.: U.S. Navy, Aviation Training Division. p. 315. NAVWEPS 00-80T-80.
  5. Flying Qualities. Vol. II: Part 2. Defense Technical Information Center. April 1986. p. 9.1. ADA170960. Retrieved December 10, 2020 via the Internet Archive.
  6. USAF 1986, pp. 9.3–9.4.
  7. 1 2 Day 1997, p. 53.
  8. Phillips 1948, p. 4.
  9. Phillips 1948, p. 6.
  10. Day 1997, pp. 1, 53.
  11. Phillips 1948, pp. 7–9.
  12. 1 2 Phillips, William H (June 1948). Effect of Steady Rolling on Longitudinal and Directional Stability (PDF) (Technical report). Washington: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. p. 2. 1627. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 Nov 2012. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
  13. Hurt 1965, p. 319.
  14. Day 1997.
  15. Day 1997, p. 36.
  16. Dr. James Young. "The story of Chuck Yeager's wild ride in the Bell X-1A". chuckyeager.com. Retrieved 8 February 2015.
  17. Day 1997, p. 8.
  18. Day 1997, p. 39.
  19. Abzug & Larrabee, p. 119.