Kaithal State

Last updated
Kaithal State
1767–1843
Detail of the main, continuous tract of territory of Kaithal State from a map created by the British East India Company of the Malwa region of Punjab showing the various polities, borders, and settlements of the area, ca.1829-1835.jpg
Detail of the main, continuous tract of territory of Kaithal State from a map created by the British East India Company, ca.1829–1835 (not including its exclaves viewable on the full-map)
Capital Kaithal
History 
 Established
1767
 Disestablished
1843
Today part of Kaithal district, Haryana, India

Kaithal State was a Jat Sikh state based out of Kaithal. It was one of the Cis-Sutlej states. [1] The Sikh chieftains of Kaithal ruled from 1767 until the state's fall in 1843. At the state's height, it was the second-largest cis-Sutlej state, after Patiala State. [2]

Contents

History

Family background

The polity was founded by Jat Sikhs of the Sidhu gotra (clan). [3] Desu Singh was a sardar from the Dallewalia Misl and an apparent descendant of the famous Sikh martyr, Bhai Dayala. [2] Desu Singh is said to have had a saintly disposition, earning him the bhai (brother) appellation. [2] Desu Singh was one of six sons of Gurbaksh Singh of Lalpur (died 1760; Gurbaksh was an ally of Ala Singh of Patiala) and was closely allied with the Phulkian family. [2] The eldest son of Grubaksh Singh and brother of Desu Singh was Budh Singh. [2]

Establishment and rule by Desu Singh

In January 1764, Desu Singh captured the parganas of Amlu Arnauli, Bangar, Derah, Kularkharyal, Mustafabad, Sindhuwal, Tandwal, and Thanesar, however these were taken from him by Bhanga Singh. [2] In 1767, the city of Kaithal fell into the hands of the Phulkian chieftain, Desu Singh. [4] [2] He had captured the principality of Kaithal from two Afghan chiefs, Bhikbakhsh Khan and Neamat Khan. [2] Furthermore, Desu Singh annexed Pundri and expelled the Sayyids from it. [2]

In 1779, the Mughal minister of Delhi, Abdul Ahad, launched a military expedition against the cis-Sutlej Sikh chiefs. [2] On 9 September 1779, the nawab dispatched Baghel Singh, Gajpat Singh, and Sada Singh, to bring Desu Singh to the camp at Thanesar. [2] When Desu arrived at the camp, Baghel explained that Desu had been dispossed of his territory by Amar Singh of Patiala and that his lost territory should be restored to him. [2] Desu Singh offered a nazar (tribute) to the nawab consisting of five gold coins, two bows, five cotton bed-sheets, and two steeds. [2] In-return, Desu Singh was gifted a khilat of five pieces, a sarpech, and a sword, while two doshalas were bestowed to one of his associates with him. [2] Abdul Ahad demanded that Desu pay a tribute of three lakh rupees, however Desu only offered to pay two lakh rupees. [2] This upset Abdul, who then upped his demand to five lakh rupees as tribute. [2] On the night of September 13th, Gajpat Singh of Jind told the nawab that it would be impossible to get money from Desu Singh, and suggested a plan to get the money from him. [2] The plan involved Abdul Ahad arresting all of the sardars as a ploy to get Desu to pay-up. [2] Diwan Nanun Mal, Maha Singh, Ram Dayal, Gajpat Singh, and Desu Singh were all then arrested but still Desu refused to pay-up, as reported by Taj Muhammad Khan. [2] Desu Singh and eight of his associates were then placed in confinement. [2] On September 14th, the Mughal official informed Desu Singh that he was to withdraw from the taluqa he had captured as the Mughal Emperor was to rule it directly. [2] Abdul Ahad also inquired about the whereabouts of weapons and loot that was captured from his late brother, Abul Qasim Khan, whom was killed-in-action after his defeat on 11 March 1776, reprimanding Desu Singh for being a plunderer. [2] Desu Singh responded that he had already used what was captured before on his army and he had no money. [2]

An agreement was finally reached between Desu and the Mughal authorities: Desu Singh's diwan was to pay five lakhs as tribute and 1.25 lakhs as expenses. [2] The condition for this was that the estates belonging to Desu Singh was to be confirmed by him through a royal rescript and were to be protected from Amar Singh of Patiala. [2] It was eventually agreed that Desu Singh was to pay four lakhs as tribute, with three lakhs being immediately realized and as a payment for the remainder, Desu Singh's son, Lal Singh, was taken captive by the Mughals. [2] Desu Singh left the Mughal camp on 26 September 1776. [2] Desu Singh died around a year later in September 1780. [note 1] [2] Desu Singh was survived by at-least two sons, Bahal Singh and Lal Singh (both being half-brothers with different mothers). [2]

Under Lal Singh

In circa 1780–1781, Desu Singh died and was succeeded by his son, Lal Singh. [4] [5] After Desu Singh's death, his widow sent representatives to prime minister Najaf Khan to secure the release of Lal Singh from prison. [2] However, Amar Singh of Patiala threatened the Kaithal widow for negotiating directly with the Mughal court of Delhi. [2] Amar Singh of Patiala instigated the other widow of Desu Singh to capture all of the assets of the late ruler, whilst also advocating against the release of Lal Singh. [2] She gave control over the assets and property she had seized to her own son, Bahal Singh. [2] Najaf Khan ordered a 50,000 rupee payment to secure the release of Lal Singh. [2] However, Lal Singh's mother did not have the necessary funds so she threatened her co-wife with a dagger to give her the necessary funds, threatening to kill her otherwise. [2] The mother of Bahal Singh paid 1,000 ashrafis (equivalent to 20,000 rupees) immediately, promising to pay-out another 20,000 rupees in a few days and the remaining 10,000 was to be paid by subscription. [2]

On 4 October 1780, Lal Singh was moved into the custody of Najaf Quli, as ordered by Najaf Khan. [2] Najaf Quli was instructed to release Lal Singh if the 50,000 payment request was fulfilled. [2] However, the Patiala representative, Darbari Mal, stated to the wazir that if he would delay the release of Lal Singh for ten-days, he would be able to retrieve an additional 20,000 rupees as ransom. [2] Thus, the Nawab took custody of Lal Singh from Najaf Quli again. [2] However, the diwan of Najaf Quli, Shiv Ram, argued for the release of Lal Singh for 50,000 rupees. [2] Lal Singh's mother paid-out 50,000 rupees in early November 1780 and Lal Singh was finally released from Mughal custody on 11 November 1780. [2] Ishar Singh was the guide and guard of Lal Singh as he travelled to Kaithal after his release. [2]

In 1795, Nana Rao Maratha of the Maratha Confederacy invaded the territories of the cis-Sutlej Sikh chiefs, including that of Bhanga Singh of Thanesar State. [2] Some Sikh chiefs who were against Bhanga Singh attempted to provoke Lal Singh to recapture Thanesar, as his father Desu had originally captured the city. [2] When Lal Singh declined to do so, the Sikh chiefs who attempted to persuade him then instigated Nana Rao Maratha to extract a heavy tribute from Lal Singh, claiming that he was a man of wealth. [2] Nana Rao Maratha set-up his administration at Thanesar and marched westward to Thana. [2] He sent a notification to Lal Singh to pay-up but the Kaithal ruler objected to this. [2] Lal Singh rallied his army and requested an alliance with Patiala State. [2] His alliance request was received by prime minister bibi Sahib Kaur of Patiala (wife of Jaimal Singh Kanhaiya), whom was the sister of raja Sahib Singh. [2] Sahib Kaur sent-out 2,000 Patiala troops to assist the cause of Lal Singh of Kaithal, with the force attacking Nana Rao Maratha at night. [2] Due to the night-attacks by the Kaithal-Patiala forces, a lack of food and water for his troops due to his supply-route from being cut-off, Nana Rao Maratha retreated to Delhi. [2]

Sketch of the country northwest of Dehli to the southern bank of the Ravi River, including the districts of Haryana and Bikaner, by William Francklin, June 1802. The territory of George Thomas is shown alongside the location of Kaithal. Sketch of the country northwest of Dehli to the southern bank of the Ravi River, including the districts of Haryana and Bikaner, by William Francklin, June 1802 (F07-10).jpg
Sketch of the country northwest of Dehli to the southern bank of the Ravi River, including the districts of Haryana and Bikaner, by William Francklin, June 1802. The territory of George Thomas is shown alongside the location of Kaithal.

George Thomas, an Irishman, had set-up his own state based in Hansi, vying to become the ruler of the Haryana region. [2] George Thomas' polity reached the border of Jind State. [2] In November 1798, George Thomas launched an invasion of Jind, leading its rulers to reach-out to both Kaithal and Patiala states for assistance repelling the forces of the Irishman. [2] In the beginning of December 1798, Lal Singh left for Jind whilst leading an army to help garrison and repel the invaders. [2] The joint Jind-Kaithal forces were successfully able to defend Jind in the ensuing conflict on 10 December 1798, with losses on George Thomas' side consisting of four killed horses and many casualties and fatalities amongst his troops whilst they were entrenched. [2] Lal Singh was petitioning raja Sahib Singh of Patiala to join the cause to defend Jind from George Thomas. [2] Finally, after a siege lasting five months, George Thomas retreated from Jind and the invasion ceased. [2]

Daulat Rao Sindhia of the Marathas controlled Delhi, Gurgaon, Rewari, Rohtak, Risar, and Sirsa, with his French general, Louis Bourquin, holding Delhi. [2] A joint force of the Sikh chiefs and Louis Bourquin were able to successfully defeat and expel George Thomas, ending his independent polity. [2] Kaithal State was a tributary to the Scindhia dynasty of the Maratha Empire, until the Second Anglo-Maratha War of 1803–1805, after which the Marathas lost this tributary to the British. [6] [7] [8] After the eruption of the Second Anglo-Maratha War, general Gerard Lake of the British forces visited Delhi. [2] Lal Singh of Kaithal had a belief that the British would best the Marathas in the ongoing war and come-out victorious. [2] Thus, Lal Singh travelled to Jind where he met with raja Bhag Singh of Jind, requesting him to join the British side. [2] General Lake afterwards would defeat the Marathas under Louis Bourquin at the Battle of Delhi (1803) on 11 September 1803, seizing Delhi on 13 September the same month. [2] Lord Lake recognized the allegiance of Lal Singh to the British during the war, therefore he bestowed upon the Kaithal ruler a sanad (letter of authority) recognizing Lal Singh's control over Faridpur and Barsat parganas. [2]

Other Sikh chiefs of the area would launch raids into the Ganges-Yamuna Doab, which was under British control by this point. [2] Throughout the year 1804, such raids by Sikhs were occurring on the British territory. [2] Lal Singh had convinced Bhag Singh of Jind State to ally with the British, with Bhag Singh in-turn trying to convince Baghel Singh to-do the same. [2] Thus, the three Sikh chiefs were in the service of General Gerard Lake and Colonel David Ochterlony for a few months. [2] Bhag Singh and Lal Singh assisted Colonel Burn with countering the Sikh and Maratha raids on the Ganges-Yamuna Doab. [2] After defeating the Sikh raiders, focus was then placed on defeating the Maratha raiders. [2] Lal Singh and Bhag Singh were custodians of Saharanpur district, maintaining the administration there whilst Burn was away taking care of the Maratha threat. [2] Various Sikh chiefs were threatening and causing nuisance to the British due to their pillaging raids inroading into British territory that was located on the other side of the Yamuna. [2] On 18 December 1804, the joint forces of Lal Singh of Kaithal and Colonel Burn of the East India Company defeated the Sikh chiefs whom were pillaging British territory. [2]

Painting depicting a meeting between Sahib Singh of Patiala State, Jodh Singh of Kalsia State, Lal Singh of Kaithal State, Mehak Singh, and raja Jaswant Rao Holkar, ca.1805 Painting depicting a meeting between Sahib Singh of Patiala State, Jodh Singh of Kalsia State, Lal Singh of Kaithal State, Mehak Singh, and Raja Jaswant Rao Holkar, ca.1805.jpg
Painting depicting a meeting between Sahib Singh of Patiala State, Jodh Singh of Kalsia State, Lal Singh of Kaithal State, Mehak Singh, and raja Jaswant Rao Holkar, ca.1805

By 1808, Kaithal had come under British protection. [9] In March 1808, Bhag Singh of Jind, Lal Singh of Kaithal, and an official associated with Sahib Singh of Patiala successfully managed to urge the British to take their states under their protection, as they were threatened by Ranjit Singh's Lahore State. [2] These events led to the signing of the Treaty of Amritsar (1809). [2] According to Lepel Henry Griffin, by the year 1809 (around the period of the British northward advance) Lal Singh of Kaithal had risen to become the second most powerful Cis-Sutlej Sikh chief, after Sahib Singh of Patiala. [2] Griffin describes Lal Singh as follows: [2]

Lai Singh was, at the time of British advance northwards, in 1809, the most powerful Cis-Satluj Chief, after the Raja of Patiala. He was a very able man, though utterly untrustworthy, and so violent and unscrupulous that the English authorities had the greatest difficulty in persuading him to maintain anything like order."

Lepel Henry Griffin

At his polity's height, Lal Singh's revenue per annum was 225,000 rupees and his cavalry force was 600-strong. [2] Lal Singh died in 1818. [4]

Under Pratap Singh

Under Uday Singh

Uday Singh ruled over Kaithal and proved to be the last ruler. Uday Singh had two wives, Suraj Kaur (daughter of the raja of Ballabhgarh State) and Mehtab Kaur (daughter of a zamindar ). [10]

In 1829, Kavi Santokh Singh came under the sponsorship of the ruler of Kaithal state, Udai Singh. [11] After being impressed by his work, the ruler bestowed a jagir grant, of the village of Morthali, to Santokh Singh in 1834. [11] Uday Singh died on 14th or 15 March 1843. [12] [13] [14] [10] [2] Uday Singh had no male issue at the time of his death. [2]

Annexation by the British

After the death of Uday Singh, there was no heir to the throne of Kaithal. [10] [2] For some time already, the British East India Company had been absorbing smaller Sikh states into its realm. [2] Suraj Kaur, one of the two widows of Uday Singh would die shortly after but Mehtab Kaur survived for many years longer. [10] Mehtab Kaur wanted to be given control over the state of her late-husband, similar to how Rani Daya Kanwar of Ambala State was allowed to retain control over Ambala State. [2] However, Mehtab Kaur's request to retain control was rejected by the British, with George Campbell stating that if there are no male issues, then daughters cannot inherit the state property but widowed wives can. [2]

The British political agent for the cis-Sutlej states was George Clark and his headquarter was located at Ambala. [2] In-light of the opposition of the state's annexation by Uday Singh's widow, George Clark of the East India Company decided to annex Kaithal State by force. [2] For the invasion of Kaithal State, the invading British force consisted of around 1,200 troops from the 31st Regiment, the 3rd Light Dragoons, and some Artillery forces under the command of Colonel Daniel Bolton, with Clark accompanying this force on its march to Kaithal (Kaithal was around 90 kilometres away from the British cantonment at Ambala). [2] The widowed rani of Kaithal State and commander Teg Singh readied the defenses of Kaithal, which at that period of time was a small town that was fortified by a tall, brick wall. [2]

'Zenan Khana and East Bastion of the Fort of Khytul', the fort of Kaithal State, ca.1842. 'Zenan Khana and East Bastion of the Fort of Khytul', the fort of Kaithal State, circa 19th century.jpg
'Zenan Khana and East Bastion of the Fort of Khytul', the fort of Kaithal State, ca.1842.

The British army reached Kaithal on the third night of their journey, which was the night of 10 April 1843. [2] The Kaithal forces appeared some distance away bearing matchlocks and lit-matchsticks, and threatening the British, which kept them on-guard the entire night, decreasing the morale of the British-side. [2] The following morning, the Kaithal forces launched an assault on the British encampment. [2] George Campbell states that this offensive routed the British forces, causing them to retreat back to Karnal. [2] Thus, the initial British invasion of Kaithal proved unsuccessful in subduing the state. [10] The British prepared a strong invasion force and were assisted by 1,000 horsemen and two guns that were led by the maharaja of Patiala State. [2] The British launched another invasion on 15 April 1843, which was successful, with the decisive battle of the invasion having been fought near the present-day Jat School. [10] In the aftermath, commander Teg Singh and other military-men of the former Kaithal State were arrested and Teg Singh's property was confiscated (including elephants, guns, and other items). [2] Mehtab Kaur retired from Kaithal in light of this. [10] The rani had escaped from Kaithal during the night after loading up treasure, transporting them by cart. [2] The next morning, George Clark sent Colonel Bolton to catch-up to her but after an entire day of searching, they failed to locate her whereabouts or the treasure's. [2] The search-party camped-out in a local jungle and returned to Kaithal the next day. [2] Hari Ram Gupta believes the rani likely went to Arnauli. [2] The British then allowed its soldiers to enter Kaithal Palace but commanded that anything found inside belongs to the British administration and was not to be taken by the troops. [2] However, some treasures and other items were snuck out by individual troops, such as a dagger that was possibly studded with diamonds, which a British official managed to sneak out of the palace and escape its detection by searchers by wrapping the blade in rags and tying it around his leg. [2] This account by this British official also discusses metal chairs that some of the men broke the legs off of to be used to play skittles with, discarding them afterwards. [2] Another Britisher took one of the discarded chair legs and realized it was made out of pure silver. [2]

In the aftermath of the lapsing of the state, the British confiscated and directly annexed the main portion of territory (including Kaithal locality itself) of the erstwhile state whilst a small portion was given to Gulab Singh of Arnauli, who was the second-cousin of Gurbaksh Singh, who had been the great-grandfather of the Kaithal chief. [10] [2] The larger portion of territory annexed by the British brought in 400,000 rupees per annum. [10] The smaller portion of territory allocated to Gulab Singh fetched an annual revenue of 100,000 rupees. [10] [2] However, the Phulkian rulers of the states of Patiala, Nabha, and Jind were against this and thought the territory of the former state of Kaithal should be given to them due to the familial ties they possessed with the Kaithal ruling house. [10] However, the British refused this request. [10] The British dispatched a report to Queen Victoria on the capture of Kaithal and Henry Lawrence wrote an account of the area in his 1843 settlement report. [10] Henry Lawrence was appointed to govern the district that formed resultive of the state's annexation. [2]

Map of Kaithal District, surveyed by William Brown just after the annexation of Kaithal State, 1843-46 Map of Kaithal District, surveyed by William Brown, 1843-46 (F.5-23).jpg
Map of Kaithal District, surveyed by William Brown just after the annexation of Kaithal State, 1843–46

After annexation, Henry Lawrence travelled to almost every village of the annexed territory between April-July 1843 and studied the past records over a decennial period of time (last 10-years; 1833-43). [2] After looking over the records, Lawrence noticed that land-revenue from farming in the former state was contracted out. [2] Lawrence reformed this system by getting rid of the middle-men, abolishing some taxes and charges (such as the cattle tax), got rid of the practice of giving presents to officials, stopped the payments in grass and wood, and abolished forced labour. [2] He additionally granted leases to the land-owners and cultivators. [2] Furthermore, the local zamindars were made to build new water well and repair old ones. [2] Lawrence introduced the cultivation of cotton, potatoes, sugar and timber trees. [2] The sides of roads of the annexed territory were planted with trees under his instruction. [2] Lawrence also donated large amounts of seed plants for plantations. [2] The report of Lawrence on the area, titled Kurnaul, 10th November, 1843, Lawrence states that he made the summary settlement for a 3-year term. [2] By the end of Lawrence's administration of Kaithal, criminality had decreased, offenders had been jailed or moved elsewhere, guns owned privately by the local population had been confiscated (with only one sword being allowed per ten-households). [2] He further suggests to the British administration that the road network and drainage system of the annexed territory needed to be developed. [2] Lawrence specifically recommends the construction of a canal as ground-water was located 60-to-100 cubits from the surface, leading the local inhabitants to find it burdensome to construct water-wells. [2]

List of rulers

No.Name

(Birth–Death)

PortraitReignRef.
1.Desu Singh [note 2]

(died September 1780)

Painting of Bhai Desu Singh of Kaithal State.jpg 1767 – September 1780 [5] [4]
2.Lal Singh Detail of Lal Singh of Kaithal State from a painting depicting a meeting between Sahib Singh of Patiala State, Jodh Singh of Kalsia State, Lal Singh of Kaithal State, Mehak Singh, and Raja Jaswant Rao Holkar, ca.1805 (cropped).jpg 1781–1814 or 1818 [5] [4]
3.Pratap Singh [note 3] 1814–1823 [5]
4.Uday Singh [note 4] Detail of a painting of Uday Singh, the last ruler of Kaithal State, from the Tazkirat Al-Umara of James Skinner, ca.1836.jpg 1823–1843 [5]

Notes

  1. Lepel Henry Griffin states that 1781 was the year Desu Singh died.
  2. Desu Singh's forename can also be spelt as 'Desa'.
  3. Pratap Singh's forename can also be spelt as 'Partap'.
  4. Uday Singh's forename can also be spelt as 'Udai' or 'Udey'.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ranjit Singh</span> Maharaja of the Sikh Empire from 1801 to 1839

Ranjit Singh was the founder and first maharaja of the Sikh Empire, ruling from 1801 until his death in 1839. He ruled the northwest Indian subcontinent in the early half of the 19th century. He survived smallpox in infancy but lost sight in his left eye. He fought his first battle alongside his father at age 10.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Anglo-Sikh war</span> 1845–46 conflict between the British East India Company and the Sikh Empire

The first Anglo-Sikh war was fought between the Sikh Empire and the British East India Company in 1845 and 1846 around the Ferozepur district of Punjab. It resulted in defeat and partial subjugation of the Sikh empire and cession of Jammu & Kashmir as a separate princely state under British suzerainty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kaithal</span> City in Haryana, India

Kaithal is a city and municipal council in the Kaithal district of the Indian state of Haryana. Kaithal was previously a part of Karnal district and later, Kurukshetra district until 1 November 1989, when it became the headquarters of the Kaithal. It shares a border with the Patiala district of state Punjab and the Kurukshetra, Jind and Karnal districts of Haryana. Kaithal district is situated in the North-West of the Haryana state. Its North-West boundaries, which include Guhla-Cheeka are attached to Punjab.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jind Kaur</span> 2nd Maharani of the Sikh Empire

Maharani Jind Kaur was regent of the Sikh Empire from 1843 until 29 March 1847. After the Sikh Empire was dissolved on 29 March 1847 the Sikhs claimed her as the Maharani and successor of Maharaja Duleep Singh. However, on the same day the British took full control and refused to accept the claims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cis-Sutlej states</span> Group of states in northwestern India

The Cis-Sutlej states were a group of states in the contemporary Punjab and Haryana states of northern India during the 19th century, lying between the Sutlej River on the north, the Himalayas on the east, the Yamuna River and Delhi District on the south, and Sirsa District on the west. Small Punjabi kingdoms of the Cis-Sutlej states paid tributes to the Marathas, until the Second Anglo-Maratha War of 1803–1805, after which the Marathas lost this territory to the British.

Bhadaur is a town in Barnala district in the state of Punjab, India. It is part of the Bhadaur Assembly Constituency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baghel Singh</span> Sikh leader of the Singh Krora Misl

Baghel Singh was a warrior leader in the Punjab region in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent in the 18th century. He rose to prominence in the area around Sutlej and Yamuna. He joined the Singh Krora Misl, one of the Misls during Sikh Confederacy. In 1765, Singh became the leader of the Misl.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Thomas (soldier)</span> Raja

George Thomas, known in India as Jaharai Jung and Jahazi Sahib, was an Irish mercenary and ultimately a Raja who was active in 18th-century India. From 1798 to 1801, he ruled a small kingdom in India, which he carved out of the Hisar and Rohtak districts of Haryana. He is often known in popular memory as the 'Raja from Tipperary'.

Rania is a town and a municipal committee in Sirsa district located on the upper bank of Ghaggar River in the Indian state of Haryana. Rania Town is a grain market in Sirsa district. Nearby cities to Rania includes Sirsa and Ellenabad. It shares its RTO office with Ellenabad which is also has its headquarters in Ellenabad. Earlier it was a part of Ellenabad subdivision but later carved out separately as a subdivision in Sirsa district of Haryana. It is at a distance of 22 km each from Sirsa and Ellenabad in opposite direction on Haryana State Highway 32A i.e. Bhambhoor-Jiwan Nagar Road which connects to Haryana State Highway 32 in Jiwan Nagar on one end and Haryana State Highway 23 in Bhambhoor on the other end.

Malaudh was a Cis-Sutlej Phulkian princely state of India till 1846, after which it was merged into the Ludhiana District by the British when they annexed the territories around Ludhiana. The town of Malaudh, or Maloud, is situated at a distance of about 40 kilometres from Ludhiana on the Ludhiana-Malerkotla Road and is linked by approach road kup-payal road though village Rorian which is now part of it as Nagar Panchayat. It lies on 75°- 56' Longitude and 30° – 38' Latitude. Malaudh is a very ancient place which was known as Malla Udey or rise of the Mallas with whom Multan or Mallustan is associated and later got corrupted to Malaudh. There was a The Loharan about 1 kilometer on the southern side which has now disappeared. Malaudh has a government high school (co-educational), middle school for girls and a primary school for boys, a post office, primary health centre and a veterinary dispensary. Malaudh became a part of the Ludhiana District when it was formed out of the territories annexed by the British in 1846.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phulkian dynasty</span> Former Punjabi royal dynasty

The Phulkian Dynasty of Maharajas or sardars were Sikh royals and aristocrats in the Punjab region of India. Members of the dynasty ruled the states of Badrukhan, Bhadaur, Faridkot, Jind, Malaudh, Nabha, and Patiala, allying themselves with the British Empire according to the terms of the Cis-Sutlej treaty of 1809. The dynasty is named after Phul Sidhu-Brar, the 17th-century common ancestor of the Phulkian states and the founder of the Phulkian Misl. Members of the Phulkian dynasty, who are the direct descendants of Rawal Jaisal Singh, the founder and ruler of the Kingdom of Jaisalmer, migrated to the present-day Malwa region in Punjab.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Faridkot State</span> Princely state of India

Faridkot State was a self-governing princely state of Punjab ruled by Brar Jats outside British India during the British Raj period in the Indian sub-continent until Indian independence. The state was located in the south of the erstwhile Ferozepore district during the British period. The former state had an area of around 1649.82 square kilometres. It population in 1941 was around 199,000 thousand. The state's rulers had cordial relations with the British.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swarup Singh of Jind</span>

Raja Swarup Singh K.C.S.I. was a Sidhu Jat Raja of Jind State of the Phulkian dynasty who reigned from 1834 to 1864. He was noted for his administration and leadership during a crucial time in the history of Punjab.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bharatpur State</span> Hindu Jat Kingdom

Bharatpur State, which is also known as the Jat State of Bharatpur historically known as the Kingdom of Bharatpur, was a Hindu Kingdom in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent. It was ruled by the Sinsinwar clan of the Hindu Jats. At the time of reign of king Suraj Mal (1755–1763) revenue of the state was 17,500,000 rupees per annual. The major architecture of this state include Lohagarh Fort and Deeg Palace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jind State</span> Princely state of India

Jind State was a princely state located in the Punjab region of north-western India. The state was 3,260 km2 (1,260 sq mi) in area and its annual income was Rs.3,000,000 in the 1940s. Jind was founded and ruled by Jat Sikh rulers of Sidhu clan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patiala State</span> Indian royal state that existed from 1763 to 1947

Patiala State was a kingdom and princely state in British India, and one of the Phulkian States, that acceded to the Union of India upon Indian independence and partition in 1947. The state was founded by Ala Singh in 1762. Patiala State was the largest and most important princely state in the Punjab Province. The state's ruler, the Maharaja of Patiala, was entitled to a 17-gun salute and held precedence over all other princes in the Punjab Province during the British Raj. The state was ruled by Jat Sikhs of the Sidhu gotra (clan).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ala Singh</span> Founder and first ruler of Patiala

Ala Singh (1691–1765) was the founder and first ruler of the princely state of Patiala. Singh was born into the Sikh Phulkian dynasty, which had an ancient lineage, being direct descendants of Rawal Jaisal Singh, the founder and ruler of the Kingdom of Jaisalmer in the 12th century, and further back to Rao Bhatti, a Hindu king in the 3rd century. Rising to power through key battles in his early life, Singh expanded his territory in Punjab.

Rani Raj Kaur was the wife of Maha Singh, the leader of the Sukerchakia Misl and the mother of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, the founder of the Sikh Empire. She was affectionately known as Mai Malwain after her marriage. She is also referred to as Sardarni Raj Kaur and Rajkumari Bibiji Raj Kaur Sahiba before marriage. She was the daughter of Raja Gajpat Singh of Jind.

The Battle of Mardanpur was fought between the Patiala forces led by Bibi Sahib Kaur and the Maratha forces led by Lakshmi Rao.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ladwa State</span> Sikh kingdom

Ladwa State was a Sikh kingdom. It was one of the Cis-Sutlej states. The state is notable for being one of the few Sikh polities south of the Sutlej that actively sided with the Sikh Empire against the British.

References

  1. Jayanta Kumar Ray (2007). Aspects of India's International Relations, 1700 to 2000: South Asia and the World. Pearson Education. p. 379. ISBN   9788131708347.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 Gupta, Hari Ram (2007). History of the Sikhs: The Sikh Comrnonwealth or Rise and FalI of Sikh Misls. History of the Sikhs. Vol. IV. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers. pp. 60–66. ISBN   8121501652.
  3. Low, D. A. (1991). Political Inheritance of Pakistan (illustrated ed.). Springer. p. 35. ISBN   9781349115563 . Retrieved 12 October 2022. Other Sidhu Jat families established the state of Faridkot, the jagirs of Kaithal and Arnauli, and a host of lesser fiefs.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Sarkar, Jadunath (1964). Fall of the Mughal Empire. Vol. 3: 1771–1788 (3rd ed.). Orient Longman. p. 106.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Surjewala, Randeep Singh. "Kaithal - An Introduction". surjewala.in. Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  6. Ahmed, Farooqui Salma (2011). A Comprehensive History of Medieval India: From Twelfth to the Mid ... - Farooqui Salma Ahmed, Salma Ahmed Farooqui - Google Books. Pearson Education India. ISBN   9788131732021 . Retrieved 26 May 2012.
  7. Chaurasia, R. S. (2004). History Of The Marathas - R.S. Chaurasia - Google Books. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. ISBN   9788126903948 . Retrieved 26 May 2012.
  8. Ray, Jayanta Kumar (2 October 2017). Aspects of India's International Relations, 1700 to 2000: South Asia and the World. Pearson Education India. ISBN   9788131708347 via Google Books.
  9. The Sikh Review, Volume 58, Issues 673-678. Sikh Cultural Centre. 2010. p. 23. Kaithal state was one of the original states whose chief Sirdar Lal Singh had sought English protection in the year 1808.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Mittal, Satish Chandra (1986). "Revolt of Mehtab Kaur of Kaithal 1842–43". Haryana: A Historical Perspective. Atlantic Publishers & Distributors. p. 40.
  11. 1 2 Sagar, Sabinderjit Singh (1993). "1. Bhai Santokh Singh and His Times". Historical Analysis of Nanak Prakash by Bhai Santokh Singh. Vol. 61 (1st ed.). Amritsar, India: Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar. pp. 10–20. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00016165.
  12. Sharma, Suresh K (2006). Haryana: Past and Present. Mittal Publications. p. 144. ISBN   81-8324-046-1.
  13. Hoiberg, Dale; Indu Ramchandani (2000). Students' Britannica India. Popular Prakashan. p. 161. ISBN   0-85229-760-2.
  14. Kaithal Town The Imperial Gazetteer of India, 1909, v. 14, p. 288-289.