Zamindar

Last updated

Sir Nawab Khwaja Salimullah was a zamindar with the title of nawab. His family's landholdings in Bengal were one of the largest in British India. Salimullah.jpg
Sir Nawab Khwaja Salimullah was a zamindar with the title of nawab. His family's landholdings in Bengal were one of the largest in British India.

A zamindar [a] in the Indian subcontinent was an autonomous or semi-autonomous feudal ruler of a zamindari (feudal estate). The term itself came into use during the reign of Mughals, and later the British began using it as a native synonym for "estate". The term means landowner in Persian. They were typically hereditary and held the right to collect tax on behalf of imperial courts or for military purposes.

Contents

During the period of British colonial rule in India many wealthy and influential zamindars were bestowed with princely and royal titles such as Maharaja , Raja/Rai, Babu , Malik, Chaudhary, Nawab , Khan and Sardar.

During the Mughal Empire, as well as the British rule, zamindars were the land-owning nobility of the Indian subcontinent [1] and formed the ruling class. Emperor Akbar granted them mansabs and their ancestral domains were treated as jagirs. [2] Majority of the big Zamindars were from the Hindu high-caste, usually Brahmin, Bhumihar, Kayastha and Rajput. [3] During the colonial era, the Permanent Settlement consolidated what became known as the zamindari system. The British rewarded supportive zamindars by recognising them as princes. Many of the region's princely states were pre-colonial zamindar holdings elevated to a greater protocol. The British also reduced the land holdings of many pre-colonial princely states and chieftaincies, demoting their status to a zamindar from previously higher ranks of royalty.[ citation needed ]

The system was abolished during land reforms in East Pakistan (Bangladesh) in 1950, [4] India in 1951 [5] and West Pakistan in 1959. [6] The zamindars often played an important role in the regional histories of the subcontinent. One of the most notable examples is the 16th-century confederation formed by twelve zamindars in the Bhati region (Baro-Bhuyans), which, according to the Jesuits and Ralph Fitch, earned a reputation for successively repelling Mughal invasions through naval battles. The zamindars were also patrons of the arts. The Tagore family produced India's first Nobel laureate in literature in 1913, Rabindranath Tagore, who was often based at his estate. The zamindars also promoted neoclassical and Indo-Saracenic architecture.

Mughal era

Mehtab Chand (1820-79) (zamindar of the Burdwan Raj) as a young man, c. 1840-45 AD. Mehtab Chand of Burdwan.jpg
Mehtab Chand (1820–79) (zamindar of the Burdwan Raj) as a young man, c. 1840–45 AD.

When Babur conquered North India, there were many autonomous and semiautonomous rulers who were known locally as Rai, Raja, Rana, Rao, Rawat, etc. while in the various Persian chronicles, they were referred to as zamindars and marzabans. They were vassals who ruled, mostly hereditarily, over their respective territories. They commanded not only a considerable part of the economic resources of the empire but also military power. After the conquest of Hindustan, Babur informs us that one-sixth of its total revenues came from the territories of the chiefs. He writes: "The revenue of the countries now held by me (1528 A.D.) from Bhira to Bihar, is fifty-two crores as will be known in detail. Eight or nine crores of this are from the parganas of rais and the rajas who have submitted in the past (to the Sultans of Delhi), receive allowance and maintenance." [7]

According to Arif Qandhari, one of the contemporary historians of Akbar's reign, there were around two to three hundred rajas or rais and zamindars who ruled their territory from strong forts under the emperor's suzerainty. Each of these rajas and zamindars commanded an army of their own generally consisting of their clansmen and the total numbers of their troops as Abul Fazl tells us, stood at forty-four lakhs comprising 384,558 cavalry, 4,277,057 infantry; 1863 elephants, 4260 guns and 4500 boats. [8] During the Mughal Era, there was no clear difference between the princely states and zamindari estates. Even the ruling autonomous chiefs of princely states were called zamindars. Moreland was one of the first historians to draw our attention to the importance of zamindars in medieval India. He defines zamindars as "vassal chiefs". He points out that there were areas under direct control of Mughals where there were no zamindars and then there were territories of the vassal chiefs who had autonomy over their state, but were subjugated by the Mughals and paid a tribute/ nazarana to the Mughal Emperor. However, Irfan Habib in his book Agrarian system of Mughal India, divided the zamindars into two categories: the autonomous chiefs who enjoyed "sovereign power" in their territories and the ordinary zamindars who exercised superior rights in land and collected land revenue and were mostly appointed by the Mughals. [9] [10] These people were known as the zamindars (intermediaries) [11] and they collected revenue primarily from the Ryots (peasants). [12] The zamindari system was more prevalent in the north of India because Mughal influence in the south was less apparent. [11]

Historian S. Nurul Hasan divided the zamindars into three categories: (i) The Autonomous Rai/ Rajas or Chiefs, (ii) the intermediary zamindars and (iii) the primary zamindars. [13]

British era

The East India Company established themselves in India by first becoming zamindars of three villages of Calcutta, Sultani and Govindpur. Later they acquired the 24-Parganas and in 1765 got control of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. [14] Later in 1857 the British Crown was established as the sovereign.

During Mughal Era the zamindars were not proprietors. They used to engage in wars and used to plunder neighbouring kings. So they never looked after the improvements in their land. The East India Company under Lord Cornwallis, realising this, made Permanent Settlement in 1793 with the zamindars and made them proprietors of their land in return for a fixed annual rent and left them independent for the internal affairs of their estates. [15] [ better source needed ] This Permanent Settlement created the new zamindari system as we know it today. After 1857 the army of the majority of zamindars were abolished with exception of a small number of force for policing/digwari/kotwali in their respective estates. If the zamindars were not able to pay the rent until sunset, parts of their estates were acquired and auctioned. This created a new class of zamindars in the society. As the rest of India came later under the control of the East India Company (EIC), different ways were implemented in different provinces to in regards to the ruling authorities in the region to get them to accede to Company authority.

The British generally adopted the extant zamindari system of revenue collection in the north of the country. They recognised the zamindars as landowners and proprietors as opposed to Mughal government and in return required them to collect taxes. Although some zamindars were present in the south, they were not so in large numbers and the British administrators used the ryotwari (cultivator) method of collection, which involved selecting certain farmers as being land owners and requiring them to remit their taxes directly. [11]

The Zamindars of Bengal were influential in the development of Bengal. They played pivotal part during the Indian Rebellion of 1857. [16]

The British continued the tradition of bestowing both royal and noble titles to zamindars who were loyal to the paramount. The title of Raja, Maharaja, Rai Saheb, Rai Bahadur, Rao, Nawab, Khan Bahadur were bestowed to princely state rulers and to many zamindars from time to time. According to an estimate in the Imperial Gazetteer of India, there were around 2000 ruling chiefs holding the royal title of Raja and Maharaja which included the rulers of princely states and several large chiefdoms. This numbers increases tenfold if zamindar/ jagirdar chiefs with other non royal but noble title are taken into count.

Accession

Unlike the autonomous or frontier chiefs, the hereditary status of the zamindar class was circumscribed by the Mughals, and the heir depended to a certain extent on the pleasure of the sovereign. [17] Heirs were set by descent or a times even adoption by religious laws. [18] Under the British Empire, the zamindars were to be subordinate to the Crown and not act as hereditary lords, but at times family politics was at the heart of naming an heir. [19] At times, a cousin could be named an heir with closer family relatives present; [20] a lawfully wedded wife could inherit the zamindari if the ruling zamindar named her as an heir. [21] [22]

Gountias

In Odisha, the local kings of the princely states appointed or sometimes rewarded individuals as village heads or gountias. Such titles are closely related to the zamindar titles. Sometimes the king's own family members were created gountias such as Veer Surendra Sai whose ancestors were the kings of Sambalpur state and whose family was the gountia of Khinda village. [23]

Abolition

The zamindari system was mostly abolished in independent India soon after its creation with the First Amendment of the Constitution of India which amended the right to property as shown in Articles 19 and 31. [24] In East Pakistan, the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act of 1950 had a similar effect of ending the system. [25] Due to the zamindari system, small farmers could not become financially strong. [26]

In global health

Critics have likened the discipline of global health to a feudal structure where individuals and institutions in high-income nations act as zamindars over health issues of low-and-middle income nations, [27] thus sustaining the imperial nature of global health. [28] [29] [30]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Alternative spellings: zomindar, zomidar, jomidar and jamindar

Related Research Articles

Nawab is a royal title indicating a ruler, often of a South Asian state, in many ways comparable to the western title of Prince. The relationship of a Nawab to the Emperor of India has been compared to that of the Kings of Saxony to the German Emperor. In earlier times the title was ratified and bestowed by the reigning Mughal emperor to semi-autonomous Muslim rulers of subdivisions or princely states in the Indian subcontinent loyal to the Mughal Empire, for example the Nawabs of Bengal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jagir</span> Feudal land grant in South Asia started in 13th century

A jagir, also spelled as jageer, was a type of feudal land grant in the Indian subcontinent at the foundation of its Jagirdar (Zamindar) system. It developed during the Islamic era of the Indian subcontinent, starting in the early 13th century, wherein the powers to govern and collect tax from an estate was granted to an appointee of the state. The tenants were considered to be in the servitude of the jagirdar. There were two forms of jagir, one conditional, the other unconditional. The conditional jagir required the governing family to maintain troops and provide their service to the state when asked. The land grant, called iqta'a, was usually for a holder's lifetime; the land reverted to the state upon the death of the jagirdar.

Taluqdars or Talukdar, were aristocrats who formed the ruling class during the Delhi Sultanate, Bengal Sultanate, Mughal Empire and British Raj. They were owners of a vast amount of lands, consistently hereditary, and had revenue and judicial powers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian feudalism</span> Indias social structure prior to the 1500s

Indian feudalism refers to the feudal society that made up India's social structure until the formation of the Republic of India in the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bardhaman Raj</span> Princely state of the British India

The Bardhaman Raj, also known as Burdwan Raj, was a zamindari Raja estate that flourished between 1657 and 1955 in the Indian state of West Bengal. Maharaja Sangam Rai Kapoor, a Punjabi Khatri from Kotli mahalla in Lahore, Punjab, who was the first member of the family to settle in Bardhaman, was the original founder of the house of Bardhaman, whereas his grandson Abu Rai, during whose time the zamindari started flourishing, is considered to be the patriarch of the Bardhaman Raj family.

Sahibzada Mīrzā Mu'hammad Jalāl ud-Dīn Mridha Sahib, better known as Jalaluddin Mirza (1898–1975), was a Bengali Indian aristocrat in the erstwhile British Empire who served as the fifth and last hereditary Zamindar of Natore from the House of Singra and Natore before it was abolished in 1951.

The Singranatore family is the consanguineous name given to a noble family in Rajshahi of landed aristocracy in erstwhile East Bengal and West Bengal that were prominent in the nineteenth century till the fall of the monarchy in India by Royal Assent in 1947 and subsequently abolished by the newly formed democratic Government of East Pakistan in 1950 by the State Acquisition Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raj Darbhanga</span> Zamindari Estate

The Darbhanga Raj, also known as Raj Darbhanga and the Khandwala dynasty, was a Maithil Brahmin dynasty and the rulers of territories, not all contiguous, that were part of the Mithila region, now divided between India and Nepal. The rulers of Raj Darbhanga were Maithil Brahmins and their seat in the town of Darbhanga became the core of the Mithila region as the rulers were patrons of Maithil culture and the Maithili language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sonbarsa Raj</span> Zamindari estate

The Sonbarsa Raj was a medieval chieftaincy and later a zamindari (estate) during British Raj in modern-day Bihar, in erstwhile Bhagalpur district. It was controlled by the Gandhavariya Rajputs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act of 1950</span>

The East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act of 1950 was a law passed by the newly formed democratic Government of East Bengal in the Dominion of Pakistan. The bill was drafted on 31 March 1948 during the early years of Pakistan and passed on 16 May 1951. Before passage of the legislature, landed revenue laws of Bengal consisted of the Permanent Settlement Regulations of 1793 and the Bengal Tenancy Act of 1885.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zamindars of Bengal</span> Hereditary landlords in Bengal

The Zamindars of Bengal were zamindars of the Bengal region of the Indian subcontinent. They governed an ancient system of land ownership.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zamindars of Natore</span>

Zamindars of Natore were influential aristocratic Bengali Zamindars, who owned large estates in what is today Natore District in Bangladesh .

Rai is a historical title of royalty and nobility in the Indian subcontinent used by rulers and chieftains of many princely states. It is derived from Raja (king). The Marathi/Telugu variant Rai was used as a substitute to King.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nagvanshi dynasty</span> Former Indian dynasty

The Nagvanshis of Chotanagpur, also known as the Khokhra chieftaincy, was an Indian dynasty which ruled the parts of Chota Nagpur plateau region during the medieval and modern periods. Phani Mukut Rai, considered the first king of the dynasty, claimed to be the son of Pundrika Naga, a mythical Naga. Lal Chintamani Sharan Nath Shahdeo (1931–2014) was last ruling king of the dynasty, until the estate was merged to the Republic of India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jhargram Raj</span>

Jhargram Raj was a zamindari which occupied a position in Bengal region of British India. The zamindari came into being during the later part of the 16th century when Man Singh of Amer was the Dewan/Subahdar of Bengal (1594–1606). Their territory was centered around present-day Jhargram district. Jhargram was never an independent territory since the chiefs of the family held it basically as the zamindars of the British Raj in India after Lord Cornwallis's Permanent Settlement of 1793. Although its owners were both rich and powerful, with the chiefs of the family holding the title of Raja, the Jhargram estate was not defined as a Princely State with freedom to decide its future course of action at the time of Indian independence in 1947. Later, the Vice-Roy of India agreed to recognize Jhargram as "Princely State" after the Second World War, but the proposal taken back as the British had decided to give independence to India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kharagpur Raj</span>

Kharagpur Raj was a prominent chieftaincy, founded in the early 16th century in Bihar situated mainly in modern-day Munger district. They were notable for being one of the few chieftaincies in Bihar to convert to Islam and many of the rulers became firm allies of the Mughal authorities. At its peak, the Kharagpur Raj encompassed parts of the modern-day districts of Munger, Bhagalpur, Jamui, Lakhisarai, Godda and Deoghar. Due to its size, the Privy Council compared it with the Kingdom of Sardinia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dumraon Raj</span> Princely state

The Dumraon Raj was a feudal principality in the Bhojpur region ruled by the Ujjainiya dynasty. The principality was founded when Raja Horil Singh founded a separate capital for himself in the town of Dumraon. The name Dumraon Raj came from its capital town.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zamindars of Bihar</span> Social group of Bihar

The Zamindars of Bihar were the autonomous and semi-autonomous rulers and administrators of the subah of Bihar during Mughal rule and later during British rule. They formed the landed aristocracy that lasted until Indian independence in 1947. The zamindars of Bihar were numerous and could be divided into small, medium and large depending on how much land they controlled. Within Bihar, the zamindars had both economic and military power. Each zamindari would have their own standing army which was typically composed of their own clansmen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jagdishpur estate</span> Principality

The Jagdishpur Raj was a feudatory zamindari ruled by a cadet branch of the Ujjainiya dynasty. It was situated in modern-day Jagdishpur, in the erstwhile Shahabad district of Bihar. The capital of the principality was the town of Jagdishpur by which the principality derived its name.

References

  1. ↑ Metcalf, Barbara Daly (1984). Moral conduct and authority: the place of adab in South Asian Islam. University of California Press. p. 269. ISBN   9780520046603. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
  2. ↑ Acharya, Shreya (30 October 2011). "Give an account of the Ruling Classes of Mughal Empire". preservearticles.com. Archived from the original on 21 May 2013.
  3. ↑ Choithani, Chetan (11 May 2023). Migration, Food Security and Development. Cambridge University Press. p. 106. ISBN   978-1-108-84037-8.
  4. ↑ Baxter, C (1997). Bangladesh, from a Nation to a State. Westview Press. p. 72. ISBN   0-8133-3632-5.
  5. ↑ "Abolition of Zamindari in India". gktoday.in. General Knowledge Today. Archived from the original on 30 November 2016.
  6. ↑ "Land reforms in Pakistan". Dawn.com. 11 October 2010. Archived from the original on 30 November 2016.
  7. ↑ Ansari, Tahir Hussain (2008). Mughal Administration and the Zamindars of Bihar (PDF) (PhD). Aligarh Muslim University. p. 1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 November 2018. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
  8. ↑ Fazl, Abul. Ain-i-Akbari (1. Saiyid Ahmad Khan, Delhi, 1856 ed.). p. 120.
  9. ↑ Ansari, Tahir Hussain (2008). Mughal Administration and the Zamindars of Bihar (PDF) (PhD). Aligarh Muslim University. pp. 3–5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 November 2018. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
  10. ↑ Hansen, Valerie; Curtis, Kenneth R. (30 December 2008). "The Politics of Empire in Southern and Eastern Asia". Voyages in World History, Volume 2: Since 1500. Cengage Learning. p. 461. ISBN   9780618077250.
  11. 1 2 3 Jaffrelot, Christophe (September–October 2000). "Sanskritization vs. Ethnicization in India: Changing Indentities and Caste Politics before Mandal". Asian Survey. 40 (5): 756–766. doi:10.2307/3021175. JSTOR   3021175.
  12. ↑ Habib, Irfan (2000) [1963]. The Agrarian System of Mughal India, 1526-1707 (2nd revised ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN   0-19-562329-0. For the meanings of zamindar see pp. 140ff.
  13. ↑ Khan, Ahsan Raza (1977). Chieftains in the Mughal Empire: During the Reign of Akbar. Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study. p. 7. OCLC   1045889555. Professor S. Nurul Hasan's article, "The Position of the Zamindars in the Mughal Empire" was however, a major breakthrough ... He has classified the zamindars in the Mughal empire into three broad categories: (a) the autonomous chieftains; (b) the intermediary zamindars, and (c) the primary zamindars.
  14. ↑ Nasserwanji Driver, Peshotan (1949). Problems of Zamindari and Land Reconstruction in India. Bombay: Bombay New Book Company LTD. p. 10.
  15. ↑ "Provisions of the Permanent Settlement Act of 1793" (User-generated content). 29 November 2014. Archived from the original on 23 September 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
  16. ↑ Patnaik, Utsa (18 March 2007). "Patriotic And Comprador Zamindars In The Great Rebellion Of 1857". People's Democracy. Archived from the original on 5 May 2012.
  17. ↑ Islam, Sirajul; Akhter, Shirin (2012). "Zamindar". In Islam, Sirajul; Jamal, Ahmed A. (eds.). Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (Second ed.). Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. Archived from the original on 3 July 2015.
  18. ↑ The Indian Law Reports: Madras series. Controller of Stationery and Print. 1888. p. 385.
  19. ↑ McLane, John R. (2002). Land and Local Kingship in Eighteenth-Century Bengal. Cambridge University Press. p. 223. ISBN   978-0-521-52654-8.
  20. ↑ Madras High Court Reports: 1870 and 1871. J. Higgingbotham. 1872. p. 209.
  21. ↑ Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee.; India. Courts. (1908). "Kashi Prasad v. Indar Kunwar". Allahabad Law Journal. 5. Indian Press: 596.
  22. ↑ Woodman, Joseph Vere; Monnier, Emile Henry (1902). A Digest of Indian Law Cases: Containing High Court Reports, 1862-1900, and Privy Council Reports of Appeals from India, 1836-1900, with an Index of Cases. Vol. III. Superintendent of Government Printing, India. p. 5498.
  23. ↑ {{cite web|url=https://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=gountia%27s%20rights
  24. ↑ Guha, Ramachandra (2011). India After Gandhi. Ecco. pp. 219–220. ISBN   978-0-330-54020-9.
  25. ↑ {{State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 [XXVII of 1951, Section 3]}}
  26. ↑ Alam, Muzahpar (2013), "The Punjab after 1715, the Zamindars and the Problems Facing the Provincial Government", The Crisis of Empire in Mughal North India (2 ed.), Delhi: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198077411.001.0001, ISBN   978-0-19-807741-1, archived from the original on 8 March 2023, retrieved 28 April 2022
  27. ↑ Keshri VR, Bhaumik S (September 2022). "The feudal structure of global health and its implications for decolonisation". BMJ Global Health. 7 (9): e010603. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010603. PMC   9516156 . PMID   36167407. S2CID   252565623.
  28. ↑ Kwete X, Tang K, Chen L, Ren R, Chen Q, Wu Z, et al. (January 2022). "Decolonizing global health: what should be the target of this movement and where does it lead us?". Global Health Research and Policy. 7 (1): 3. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00237-3 . PMC   8784247 . PMID   35067229.
  29. ↑ Rasheed MA (December 2021). "Navigating the violent process of decolonisation in global health research: a guideline". The Lancet. Global Health. 9 (12): e1640–e1641. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00440-X . PMID   34798014. S2CID   244286291.
  30. ↑ Affun-Adegbulu C, Adegbulu O (August 2020). "Decolonising Global (Public) Health: from Western universalism to Global pluriversalities". BMJ Global Health. 5 (8): e002947. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002947. PMC   7443258 . PMID   32819916. S2CID   221220715.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.