Pokhran-II

Last updated

Pokhran-II
Operation Shakti
ShaktiBomb.jpg
Shakti I prior to its detonation
Information
CountryIndia
Test site Pokhran Test Range, Rajasthan
Coordinates 27°04′44″N71°43′20″E / 27.07889°N 71.72222°E / 27.07889; 71.72222
Period11–13 May 1998
Number of tests3 (5 devices fired)
Test type Underground
Device type fission and fusion
Max. yield45 kilotons of TNT (190 TJ)
Test chronology
←  Pokhran-I

Pokhran-II (Operation Shakti) was a series of five nuclear weapon tests conducted by India in May 1998. The bombs were detonated at the Indian Army's Pokhran Test Range in Rajasthan. It was the second instance of nuclear testing conducted by India, after the first test, code-named Smiling Buddha , was conducted in May 1974.

Contents

The test consisted of five detonations, the first of which was a high yield fusion bomb while the remaining four were fission bombs. One fusion and two fission bombs were detonated on 11 May 1998 and two more fission bombs were detonated two days later on 13 May 1998. The tests were collectively called Operation Shakti, and the five nuclear bombs were designated as Shakti-I through to Shakti-V.

The tests achieved their main objective of giving India the capability to build fission and thermonuclear weapons with yields up to 200 kilotons. Then chairman of the Indian Atomic Energy Commission described each one of the explosions to be equivalent to several tests carried out over the years by various nations. The Indian government convened a press conference to announce the tests and declared India as a full-fledged nuclear state. As a consequence of the tests, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1172 was enacted and economic sanctions were imposed by a number of countries including Japan and the United States.

History

Early nuclear programme (1944–1965)

Efforts towards building a nuclear bomb, infrastructure, and research on related technologies have been undertaken by India since the end of Second World War. [1] The origins of India's nuclear program can be traced back to 1945 when nuclear physicist Homi Bhabha established the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) with the aid of Tata Group. After Indian Independence, the Atomic Energy Act was passed on 15 April 1948, that established the Indian Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC). [2] In 1954, Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) was established which was responsible for the atomic development programme and was allocated a significant amount of the defence budget in the subsequent years. In 1956, the first nuclear reactor became operational at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), becoming the first operating reactor in Asia. [3] In 1961, India commissioned a reprocessing plant to produce weapon grade Plutonium. In 1962, India was engaged in a war with China and with China conducting its own nuclear test in 1964, it accelerated India's need to develop nuclear weapons. [2] [1]

With two reactors operational in early 1960s, research progressed in learning and development of know-how to manufacture nuclear weapons. [4] [2] With the unexpected deaths of then Prime Minister Nehru in 1964 and Bhabha in 1966, the programme slowed down. [5] The incoming prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri appointed physicist Vikram Sarabhai as the head of the nuclear programme and the direction of the programme changed towards utilizing nuclear energy peaceful purposes rather than military development. [6]

Development of nuclear bomb and first test (1966–1972)

APSARA reactor and plutonium reprocessing facility at BARC as photographed by a US satellite on 19 February 1966 Trombay.jpg
APSARA reactor and plutonium reprocessing facility at BARC as photographed by a US satellite on 19 February 1966

After Shastri's death in 1966, Indira Gandhi became the prime minister and work on the nuclear programme resumed. The design work on the bomb proceeded under physicist Raja Ramanna, who continued the nuclear weapons technology research after Bhabha's death in 1966. [5] The project employed 75 scientists and progressed in secrecy. [6] During the Indo-Pakistani War, the U.S. government sent a carrier battle group into the Bay of Bengal in an attempt to intimidate India, who were aided by the Soviet Union, who responded by sending a submarine armed with nuclear missiles. The Soviet response demonstrated the deterrent value and significance of nuclear weapons to India. [7] After India gained military and political initiative over Pakistan in the war, the work on building a nuclear device continued. The hardware began to be built in early 1972 and the Prime Minister authorized the development of a nuclear test device in September 1972. [8]

On 18 May 1974, India tested a implosion-type fission device at the Indian Army's Pokhran Test Range under the code name Smiling Buddha . [9] The test was called as a Peaceful Nuclear Explosive (PNE) and the yield was estimated to be between 6 and 10 kilotons. [9] [10] [11] [12]

Aftermath of nuclear tests (1973–1988)

While India continued to state that the test was for peaceful purposes, it encountered opposition from many countries. The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) was formed in reaction to the Indian tests to check international nuclear proliferation. [13] The technological embargo and sanctions affected the development of India's nuclear program. [14] It was crippled by the lack of indigenous resources and dependence on imported technology on certain areas. Though India declared to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that India's nuclear program was intended only for peaceful purposes, preliminary work on a fusion bomb was initiated. [15] In the aftermath of the state emergency in 1975 that resulted in the collapse of the government, the program continued under M.R. Srinivasan, but made slow progress. Though the nuclear program did not receive much attention from incoming Prime Minister Morarji Desai at first, the program gained impetus when Ramanna was appointed to the Ministry of Defence. [16]

With the discovery of Pakistan's clandestine atomic bomb program, India realized that it was very likely to succeed in its project in a few years. With the return of Indira Gandhi in 1980, the nuclear program gained momentum. Two new underground shafts were constructed at the Pokhran test range by 1982 and Gandhi approved further nuclear tests in 1982. But the decision was reversed owing to pressure from the United States as it might end-up in nuclear brinkmanship with Pakistan and potential foreign policy implications. But work continued towards weaponizing the nuclear bomb under V. S. R. Arunachalam and the Indian missile programme was launched under A. P. J. Abdul Kalam. [15] Ramanna pushed forward with a Uranium enrichment program and despite the sanctions, India imported heavy water required as a neutron moderator in the nuclear reactors, from countires like China, Norway and Soviet Union through a middleman. Though Rajiv Gandhi, who became the Prime Minister in 1984, supported technological development and research, he was skeptical about nuclear testing as he believed it would result in further technological alienation from the developed countries. Dhruva, a new reactor with a capability to produce larger quantities of weapon grade material, was commissioned at BARC in 1985. Other components for a nuclear fusion bomb were developed during the time with capabilities to air drop nuclear weapons. In late 1985, a study group commissioned by the Prime Minister outlined a plan for the production of 70 to 100 nuclear warheads and a strict no first use policy. [15]

Building towards second nuclear test (1989–1998)

In 1989, V.P. Singh formed the government, which collapsed within two years and this period of instability caused a snag in the nuclear weapons programme. Foreign relations between India and Pakistan severely worsened when India accused Pakistan of supporting the Insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir. During this time, the Indian Missile Program succeeded in the development of the Prithvi missiles. India decided to observe the temporary moratorium on the nuclear tests for fear of inviting international criticism. [17] The NSG decided in 1992 to require full-scope IAEA safeguards for any new nuclear export deals, which effectively ruled out nuclear exports to India. [18]

Though India had stock-piled material and components to be able to construct a dozen nuclear fission bombs, the deliverance mechanism was still under development. With the successful testing of Agni missile and successful trials involving dropping of similar bombs without fissionable material from bomber aircraft in 1994, the weaponization became successful. With the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty under discussion and global pressure pushing India to sign, then Indian Prime Minister Narasimha Rao ordered preparations for further nuclear tests in 1995. Based on the direction of the director of DAE R. Chidambaram, S. K. Sikka was tasked with the development of a thermo-nuclear fusion device. In August, K. Santhanam, the chief technical adviser of DRDO, was appointed the director for carrying out the tests. While water was being pumped out of the shafts constructed more than ten years earlier, American spy satellites picked up the signs. [17] With pressure from US President Bill Clinton, the test never progressed. [19]

With Rao's term ending in 1996, the next two years saw multiple governments being formed. Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who was a strong advocate of nuclear weaponization, came to power following the 1998 general elections. Vajpayee had earlier declared that if re-voted to power, his government would induct nuclear weapons and declare India's might to gather respect. [20] Soon after assuming power in March 1998, Vajpayee organized a discussion with Abdul Kalam and Chidambaram to conduct nuclear tests. On 28 March 1998, he asked to make preparations for a test. [21]

Nuclear test

US Marine Intelligence maps showing the Indian test site in 1997 Tracking Nuclear Proliferation, India.jpg
US Marine Intelligence maps showing the Indian test site in 1997

Preparation

The Indian Intelligence Bureau had been aware of the capability of the United States spy satellites in detecting Indian test preparations. Therefore, the tests required complete secrecy and the 58th Engineer Regiment of the Indian Army Corps of Engineers was tasked with preparing the test sites without being detected. [22] Work was mostly done during night, and equipment was returned to the original place during the day to give the impression that it was never moved. Bomb shafts were dug under camouflage netting and the dug-out sand was shaped like natural sand dunes. Cables and sensors were either covered with sand or concealed using native vegetation. A select group was involved in the detonation process with all personnel required to wear uniforms to preserve the secrecy of the tests. They were given pseudo-names and they traveled in smaller groups to avoid detection. [22] [20]

Scientists and engineers of BARC, the Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research (AMDER), and DRDO were involved in the development and assembly of the bombs. Three laboratories of the DRDO were involved in designing, testing and producing components for the bombs, including the detonators, the implosion and high-voltage trigger systems. These were also responsible for systems engineering, aerodynamics and safety. The bombs were transported moved from BARC at 3 am on 1 May 1998 to Bombay airport, then flown in an Indian Air Force's AN-32 aircraft to Jaisalmer Airport. It was then transported to Pokhran in an army convoy of four trucks, and this required three trips. The devices were delivered to the device preparation building, which was designated as Prayer Hall'. [23]

Personnel

A. P. J. Abdul Kalam was one of the co-ordinators for the test A.P.J Abdul Kalam.jpg
A. P. J. Abdul Kalam was one of the co-ordinators for the test

Following were the main personnel involved in the testing: [23]

Testing

The Thar Desert in the state of Rajasthan where the nuclear site, the Pokhran Test Range, is located A sunset on the dunes of the Great Indian Thar Desert Rajasthan India.jpg
The Thar Desert in the state of Rajasthan where the nuclear site, the Pokhran Test Range, is located

The test was organized into two groups to be fired separately, with all devices in a group fired at the same time. Five nuclear devices were tested during the operation. [24] [23] [25]
Group-I:

Group-II:

An additional, sixth device (Shakti VI) was developed but not detonated. The first test was planned on 11 May. [26] The high yield thermonuclear device was placed in a shaft code named White House, which was approximately 230 metres [m] (750 ft) deep, the fission bomb was placed in a 150 metres (490 ft) deep shaft code named Taj Mahal, and the first sub-kiloton device in shaft Kumbhakarna. The first three devices were placed in their respective shafts on 10 May. The first device to be placed was the sub-kiloton device, which was sealed by the army engineers by 8:30 PM. The thermonuclear device was lowered and sealed by 4 AM on the next day with the fission device being placed by 7:30 AM. The shafts were L-shaped, with a horizontal chamber used for the test devices. [23] The timing of the tests was pursuant to the local weather conditions, and the test sequence was initiated in the afternoon. Santhanam, in-charge of the test site, handed over the site to M. Vasudev, the range safety officer, who was responsible for verifying the test indicators. After the safety clearance, the countdown system was activated and at 3:45 PM IST, the three devices were detonated simultaneously. [23] [20] [27] On 13 May, at 12.21 PM IST, two sub-kiloton devices (Shakti IV and V) were detonated. Due to their very low yield, these explosions were not detected by any seismic station. [20] [28]

Announcement

Having tested weaponized nuclear warheads, India became the sixth country to join the nuclear club. [29] Shortly after the tests, Prime Minister Vajpayee appeared before the press corps and made the following short statement:

Today, at 15:45 hours, India conducted three underground nuclear tests in the Pokhran range. The tests conducted today were with a fission device, a low yield device and a thermonuclear device. The measured yields are in line with expected values. Measurements have also confirmed that there was no release of radioactivity into the atmosphere. These were contained explosions like the experiment conducted in May 1974. I warmly congratulate the scientists and engineers who have carried out these successful tests. [30] [31]

On 13 May 1998, India declared the series of tests to be over after this. [32] [33]

Reactions to tests

Domestic

News of the tests were greeted with jubilation and large-scale approval by general public in India. The Bombay Stock Exchange registered significant gains. The media praised the government for its decision and advocated the development of an operational nuclear arsenal for the country's armed forces. The opposition led by Indian National Congress criticized the Vajpayee administration for carrying out the series of nuclear tests, accusing the government of trying to use the tests for political ends rather than to enhance the country's national security. [34]

By the time India had conducted tests, the country had a total of $44bn in loans in 1998, from the IMF and the World Bank. The industrial sectors of the Indian economy were likely to be hurt by sanctions with the foreign companies, which had invested heavily in India, facing consequences of impending sanctions. The Indian government announced that it had factored the economic response and was willing to take the consequences. [35]

International

The United States issued a statement condemning India and threatened economic sanctions. The intelligence community felt humiliated for its failure to detect the preparations for the test. [36] In keeping with its preferred approach to foreign policy in recent decades, and in compliance with the 1994 anti-proliferation law, the United States imposed economic sanctions on India. [37] The sanctions on India consisted of cutting off all assistance to India except humanitarian aid, banning the export of certain defense material and technologies, ending American credit and credit guarantees to India, and requiring the US to oppose lending by international financial institutions to India. [38] The United States held talks with India over the issue of India becoming a part of the CTBT and NPT and pressurized to rollback India's nuclear program. [39] India did not accede to the request stating that it was not consistent with her national security interest. [40]

Canada criticized India's actions. [41] Japan imposed economic sanctions which included freezing all new loans and grants except for humanitarian aid. [42] Few other nations also imposed sanctions on India, primarily in the form of suspension of foreign aid and government-to-government credit lines. China stated that it was seriously concerned about the tests which are not favorable to the peace and stability in the region and called for the international community to pressurize India to cease the development of nuclear weapons. [43] It further rejected claims of India's stated rationale of needing nuclear capabilities to counter a Chinese threat as unfounded. [44] However, permanent members of the United Nations Security Council such as the United Kingdom, France, and Russia refrained from making any statements condemning the tests. [45]

Pakistan issued a statement blaming India for instigating a nuclear arms race in the region with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif stating that his country will take appropriate action. [46] Pakistan carried out six nuclear tests under the codename Chagai-I on 28 May 1998 and Chagai-II on 30 May 1998. [20] Pakistan's leading nuclear physicist, Pervez Hoodbhoy, held India responsible for Pakistan's nuclear test experiments. [47] Pakistan's subsequent tests invited similar condemnation and economic sanctions. [48] [49] On June 6, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1172, condemning the Indian and Pakistani tests. [50]

The Government of India declared 11 May as National Technology Day in India to commemorate the first of the five successful nuclear weapon tests that were carried out on 11 May 1998. [51] The day is celebrated by giving awards to various individuals and industries in the field of science and technology. [52]

Parmanu: The Story of Pokhran is a 2018 Bollywood movie was based on the nuclear tests. [53] War and Peace is a documentary by Anand Patwardhan, which details the events of the tests. [54]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapon</span> Explosive weapon that utilizes nuclear reactions

A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion reactions, producing a nuclear explosion. Both bomb types release large quantities of energy from relatively small amounts of matter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear proliferation</span> Spread of nuclear weapons

Nuclear proliferation is the spread of nuclear weapons, fissionable material, and weapons-applicable nuclear technology and information to nations not recognized as "Nuclear Weapon States" by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT. Proliferation has been opposed by many nations with and without nuclear weapons, as governments fear that more countries with nuclear weapons will increase the possibility of nuclear warfare, de-stabilize international or regional relations, or infringe upon the national sovereignty of nation states.

Smiling Buddha was the code name of India's first successful nuclear weapon test on 18 May 1974. The nuclear fission type bomb was detonated in the Pokhran Test Range of the Indian Army in Rajasthan. As per the United States military intelligence, the operation was named as Happy Krishna. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) described the test as a peaceful nuclear explosion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapons testing</span> Controlled detonation of nuclear weapons for scientific or political purposes

Nuclear weapons tests are experiments carried out to determine the performance, yield, and effects of nuclear weapons. Testing nuclear weapons offers practical information about how the weapons function, how detonations are affected by different conditions, and how personnel, structures, and equipment are affected when subjected to nuclear explosions. However, nuclear testing has often been used as an indicator of scientific and military strength. Many tests have been overtly political in their intention; most nuclear weapons states publicly declared their nuclear status through a nuclear test.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pokhran</span> Town in Rajasthan, India

Pokhran is a town and a municipality located 112 km east of Jaisalmer city in the Jaisalmer district of the Indian state of Rajasthan. It is situated in the Thar Desert region. Surrounded by rocks, sand and five salt ranges, the word "Pokaran" (पोकरण) means "place surrounded by five salt-ranges" in Rajasthani. The site for India's first and second underground nuclear weapon test is near Pokhran.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">India and weapons of mass destruction</span>

India possesses nuclear weapons and previously developed chemical weapons. Although India has not released any official statements about the size of its nuclear arsenal, recent estimates suggest that India has 172 nuclear weapons and has produced enough weapons-grade plutonium for up to 200 nuclear weapons. In 1999, India was estimated to have 800 kilograms (1,800 lb) of separated reactor-grade plutonium, with a total amount of 8,300 kilograms (18,300 lb) of civilian plutonium, enough for approximately 1,000 nuclear weapons. India has conducted nuclear weapons tests in a pair of series namely Pokhran I and Pokhran II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raja Ramanna</span> Indian physicist

Raja Ramanna was an Indian nuclear physicist. He was the director of India's nuclear program in the late 1960s and early 1970s, which culminated in Smiling Buddha, India's first successful nuclear weapon test on 18 May 1974.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapons in popular culture</span>

Since their public debut in August 1945, nuclear weapons and their potential effects have been a recurring motif in popular culture, to the extent that the decades of the Cold War are often referred to as the "atomic age".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bhabha Atomic Research Centre</span> Nuclear research facility in Mumbai, India

The Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) is India's premier nuclear research facility, headquartered in Trombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. It was founded by Homi Jehangir Bhabha as the Atomic Energy Establishment, Trombay (AEET) in January 1954 as a multidisciplinary research program essential for India's nuclear program. It operates under the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), which is directly overseen by the Prime Minister of India.

Uranium-233 is a fissile isotope of uranium that is bred from thorium-232 as part of the thorium fuel cycle. Uranium-233 was investigated for use in nuclear weapons and as a reactor fuel. It has been used successfully in experimental nuclear reactors and has been proposed for much wider use as a nuclear fuel. It has a half-life of 160,000 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thermonuclear weapon</span> 2-stage nuclear weapon

A thermonuclear weapon, fusion weapon or hydrogen bomb (H bomb) is a second-generation nuclear weapon design. Its greater sophistication affords it vastly greater destructive power than first-generation nuclear bombs, a more compact size, a lower mass, or a combination of these benefits. Characteristics of nuclear fusion reactions make possible the use of non-fissile depleted uranium as the weapon's main fuel, thus allowing more efficient use of scarce fissile material such as uranium-235 or plutonium-239. The first full-scale thermonuclear test was carried out by the United States in 1952, and the concept has since been employed by most of the world's nuclear powers in the design of their weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Teller–Ulam design</span> History of technical design of modern hydrogen bombs

The Teller–Ulam design is a technical concept behind modern thermonuclear weapons, also known as hydrogen bombs. The design – the details of which are military secrets and known to only a handful of major nations – is believed to be used in virtually all modern nuclear weapons that make up the arsenals of the major nuclear powers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapon yield</span> Energy released in nuclear weapons explosions

The explosive yield of a nuclear weapon is the amount of energy released such as blast, thermal, and nuclear radiation, when that particular nuclear weapon is detonated, usually expressed as a TNT equivalent (the standardized equivalent mass of trinitrotoluene which, if detonated, would produce the same energy discharge), either in kilotonnes (kt—thousands of tonnes of TNT), in megatonnes (Mt—millions of tonnes of TNT), or sometimes in terajoules (TJ). An explosive yield of one terajoule is equal to 0.239 kilotonnes of TNT. Because the accuracy of any measurement of the energy released by TNT has always been problematic, the conventional definition is that one kilotonne of TNT is held simply to be equivalent to 1012 calories.

The Nuclear Command Authority (NCA) of India is the authority responsible for command, control and operational decisions regarding India's nuclear weapons programme. It comprises a Political Council headed by the Prime Minister of India and an Executive Council headed by the National Security Advisor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chagai-I</span> Pakistans first successful nuclear weapons test (1998)

Chagai-I is the code name of five simultaneous underground nuclear tests conducted by Pakistan at 15:15 hrs PKT on 28 May 1998. The tests were performed at Ras Koh Hills in the Chagai District of Balochistan Province.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orange Herald</span> British nuclear weapons

Orange Herald was a British nuclear weapon, tested on 31 May 1957. At the time it was reported as an H-bomb, although in fact it was a large boosted fission weapon and remains to date, the largest fission device ever detonated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Munir Ahmad Khan</span> Pakistani nuclear physicist (1926–1999)

Munir Ahmad Khan, NI, HI, FPAS, was a Pakistani nuclear reactor physicist who is credited, among others, with being the "father of the atomic bomb program" of Pakistan for their leading role in developing their nation's nuclear weapons during the successive years after the war with India in 1971.

Satinder Kumar Sikka was an Indian nuclear condensed matter physicist, crystallographer and a former Scientific Secretary to the Principal Scientific Advisor of the Government of India. He was known to have played a crucial role, along with Raja Ramanna, Rajagopala Chidambaram and Basanti Dulal Nagchaudhuri, in the design and development of a Hydrogen Bomb by India, which was tested at the Pokhran Test Range in May 1998, under the code name, Operation Shakthi. He was also involved in the Smiling Buddha tests, conducted in 1974. He was awarded the fourth highest civilian award of the Padma Shri, by the Government of India, in 1999.

References

  1. 1 2 "Homi Bhabha and how World War II was responsible for creating India's nuclear future". The print. 30 October 2019. Archived from the original on 6 May 2023. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  2. 1 2 3 Sublette, Carey. "Origins of Indian nuclear program". Nuclear weapon Archive. Retrieved 13 November 2011.
  3. ↑ "Apsara – U Reactor Becomes Operational at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay" (Press release). Government of India. 11 September 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  4. ↑ Kumar, P. (2024). Homi J. Bhabha: A Complete Biography: Homi J. Bhabha: A Complete Biography: Architect of India's Nuclear Program. Prabhakar Prakashan Private Limited. p. 1960. ISBN   978-93-5562-943-2. Archived from the original on 20 May 2024. Retrieved 20 May 2024.
  5. 1 2 "On to Weapons Development, 1960–67". Nuclear Weapon Archive. 30 March 2001. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  6. 1 2 Kanavi, Shivanand. "How Indian PMs reacted to nuclear bombs". Rediff.com . Archived from the original on 15 November 2019. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
  7. ↑ "Arihant: the annihilator". Indian Defence Review. 25 October 2010. Archived from the original on 13 June 2016. Retrieved 8 January 2012.
  8. ↑ Perkovich, G. (1999). India's Nuclear Bomb: The Impact on Global Proliferation. ACLS Humanities E-Book. University of California Press. p. 172. ISBN   978-0-520-23210-5.
  9. 1 2 "Smiling Buddha, 1974". India's Nuclear Weapons Program. Nuclear Weapon Archive.
  10. ↑ Pahuja, Om Parkash (2001). India: A Nuclear Weapon State. Prabhat Prakashan. pp. 63–. ISBN   978-81-87100-69-0 . Retrieved 29 June 2012.
  11. ↑ "1974 Nuclear files". Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. Nuclear files archives. Archived from the original on 2 July 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  12. ↑ Bates, Crispin (2007). Subalterns and Raj: South Asia Since 1600. Routledge. p. 343. ISBN   978-0-415-21484-1.
  13. ↑ "History of the NSG". Nuclear Suppliers Group. Archived from the original on 3 February 2023. Retrieved 14 January 2023.
  14. ↑ "Smiling Buddha: All about Pokhran test that made India a nuclear power". The Indian Hawk. 19 May 2020. Archived from the original on 7 July 2020. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  15. 1 2 3 "The Long Pause: 1974–1989". Nuclear Weapon Archive. Retrieved 14 November 2011.
  16. ↑ Chengappa, Raj (2000). Weapons of peace : the secret story of India's quest to be a nuclear power. New Delhi: Harper Collins Publishers, India. pp. 219–220. ISBN   81-7223-330-2.
  17. 1 2 "The Momentum Builds: 1989-1998". Nuclear Weapon Archive. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  18. ↑ "Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG)" (PDF). Nuclear Threat Initiative. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 May 2003. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  19. ↑ "India wants to divert attention from N-test plan". Dawn Archives. CNN. 4 January 1996. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 "The nuclear politics: The 1998 Election". Nuclear weapon archives. Nuclear politics. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  21. ↑ (PTI), Press Trust of India (September 2009). "Pokhran II row: Sethna slams Kalam, Iyengar says tests were done in haste". DNA News. Archived from the original on 29 March 2012. Retrieved 15 November 2011.
  22. 1 2 "Books: Weapons of Peace—How the CIA was Fooled". India Today. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 30 October 2006.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 "India's Nuclear Weapons Program—Operation Shakti: 1998". Nuclear Weapon Archive. Retrieved 21 July 2012.
  24. ↑ "Forces gung-ho on N-arsenal". The Times of India . Archived from the original on 21 May 2013. Retrieved 21 July 2012.
  25. ↑ "Press Statement by Dr. Anil Kakodkar and Dr. R. Chidambaram on Pokhran-II tests". Press Information Bureau, Government of India . 24 September 2009. Archived from the original on 24 October 2017.
  26. ↑ "Spectral defence". Frontline. Archived from the original on 23 March 2024. Retrieved 23 March 2024.
  27. ↑ "India releases pictures of nuclear tests". CNN. 17 May 1998. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
  28. ↑ Sumit Ganguly (Spring 1999). "India's Pathway to Pokhran II: The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi's Nuclear Weapons Program". International Security. 23 (4): 148–177. doi:10.1162/isec.23.4.148. JSTOR   2539297. S2CID   57565560.
  29. ↑ "Asia's nuclear challenge: Third World joins the nuclear club". BBC India 1998. 13 May 1998. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
  30. ↑ "Prime Minister's announcement of India's three underground nuclear tests". FAS. Archived from the original on 14 March 2002. Retrieved 31 January 2013.
  31. ↑ "Prime Minister's press briefing video". YouTube . Archived from the original on 24 December 2023. Retrieved 24 December 2023.
  32. ↑ "Planned Series of Nuclear Tests Completed" (Press release). Government of India. 13 May 1998. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
  33. ↑ Ganguly, Sumit (1999). "India's Pathway to Pokhran II: The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi's Nuclear Weapons Program". International Security. 23 (4): 148–177. doi:10.1162/isec.23.4.148. ISSN   0162-2889. JSTOR   2539297. S2CID   57565560. Archived from the original on 25 May 2022. Retrieved 25 May 2022.
  34. ↑ Lyon, David (31 May 1998). "India detonates two more bombs". BBC. Archived from the original on 1 November 2013. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
  35. ↑ BBC Reports (1 June 1998). "India—will sanctions bite?". BBC. Archived from the original on 30 June 2023. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  36. ↑ Weiner, T. (13 May 1998). "Nuclear anxiety: The Blunders; U.S. Blundered On Intelligence, Officials Admit". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  37. ↑ BBC Release (13 May 1998). "US imposes sanctions on India". BBC. Archived from the original on 26 December 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  38. ↑ "U.S. imposes sanctions on India". CNN. Archived from the original on 30 June 2023. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  39. ↑ "Clarifying India's Nascent Nuclear Doctrine". Arms control interview. Archived from the original on 10 June 2015. Retrieved 10 June 2015.
  40. ↑ Chandrasekharan, S. "CTBT : where does India stand?". South Asia Analysis. Archived from the original on 10 June 2015. Retrieved 10 June 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  41. ↑ Haidar, Suhasini (31 August 2014). "East meets Far East". The Hindu . Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 14 January 2015.
  42. ↑ "U.S. lifts final sanctions on Pakistan". CNN. 29 October 2001. Archived from the original on 3 April 2012.
  43. ↑ "China is 'Seriously Concerned' But Restrained in Its Criticism". New York Times. 13 May 1998. Archived from the original on 20 May 2024. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  44. ↑ Resources on India and Pakistan (1999). "China's Reaction to India's Nuclear Tests". CNS Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies. Archived from the original on 3 January 2013. Retrieved 15 May 2012.
  45. ↑ Charan D. Wadhva (27 June 1998). "Costs of Economic Sanctions: Aftermath of Pokhran II". Economic and Political Weekly. 33 (26): 1604–1607. JSTOR   4406922.
  46. ↑ Special Report (13 May 1998). "Pakistan condemns India's nuclear tests". BBC. Archived from the original on 1 November 2013. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  47. ↑ Hoodbhoy, Pervez Amerali (23 January 2011). "Nuclear Bayonet". The Herald . Archived from the original on 18 February 2011. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  48. ↑ "cns.miis.edu". Archived from the original on 18 November 2001. Retrieved 8 January 2009.
  49. ↑ Gertz, Bill (2013). Betrayal: How the Clinton Administration Undermined American Security . Washington DC: Regnery Publishing. ISBN   978-1-62157-137-7.
  50. ↑ Dittmer, L., ed. (2005). South Asia's nuclear ecurity dilemma: India, Pakistan, and China. Armonk, NY: Sharpe. ISBN   978-0-7656-1419-3.
  51. ↑ "Why May 11 be celebrated as National Technology Day? Things you should know". The Times of India . 11 May 2020. Archived from the original on 24 May 2020. Retrieved 11 May 2020.
  52. ↑ "National technology day celebrated". Department of Science and Technology. Press Information Bureau. 11 May 2008. Archived from the original on 15 December 2010. Retrieved 9 January 2011.
  53. ↑ Ghosh, Samrudhi (14 August 2017). "John Abraham unveils Parmanu poster: All you need to know about the story of Pokhran". India Today . Archived from the original on 24 December 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  54. ↑ "War and Peace hits the box office for the first time in India". Tehelka . 25 June 2005. Archived from the original on 12 September 2012. Retrieved 1 December 2011.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.