Leray spectral sequence

Last updated

In mathematics, the Leray spectral sequence was a pioneering example in homological algebra, introduced in 1946 [1] [2] by Jean Leray. It is usually seen nowadays as a special case of the Grothendieck spectral sequence.

Contents

Definition

Let be a continuous map of topological spaces, which in particular gives a functor from sheaves of abelian groups on to sheaves of abelian groups on . Composing this with the functor of taking sections on is the same as taking sections on , by the definition of the direct image functor :

Thus the derived functors of compute the sheaf cohomology for :

But because and send injective objects in to -acyclic objects in , there is a spectral sequence [3] pg 33,19 whose second page is

and which converges to

This is called the Leray spectral sequence.

Generalizing to other sheaves and complexes of sheaves

Note this result can be generalized by instead considering sheaves of modules over a locally constant sheaf of rings for a fixed commutative ring . Then, the sheaves will be sheaves of -modules, where for an open set , such a sheaf is an -module for . In addition, instead of sheaves, we could consider complexes of sheaves bounded below for the derived category of . Then, one replaces sheaf cohomology with sheaf hypercohomology.

Construction

The existence of the Leray spectral sequence is a direct application of the Grothendieck spectral sequence [3] pg 19. This states that given additive functors

between Abelian categories having enough injectives, a left-exact functor, and sending injective objects to -acyclic objects, then there is an isomorphism of derived functors

for the derived categories . In the example above, we have the composition of derived functors

Classical definition

Let be a continuous map of smooth manifolds. If is an open cover of , form the Čech complex of a sheaf with respect to cover of :

The boundary maps and maps of sheaves on together give a boundary map on the double complex

This double complex is also a single complex graded by , with respect to which is a boundary map. If each finite intersection of the is diffeomorphic to , one can show that the cohomology

of this complex is the de Rham cohomology of . [4] :96 Moreover, [4] :179 [5] any double complex has a spectral sequence E with

(so that the sum of these is ), and

where is the presheaf on Y sending . In this context, this is called the Leray spectral sequence.

The modern definition subsumes this, because the higher direct image functor is the sheafification of the presheaf .

Examples

Since is simply connected, any locally constant presheaf is constant, so this is the constant presheaf . So the second page of the Leray spectral sequence is
As the cover of is also good, . So
Here is the first place we use that is a projection and not just a fibre bundle: every element of is an actual closed differential form on all of , so applying both d and to them gives zero. Thus . This proves the Künneth theorem for simply connected:

Degeneration theorem

In the category of quasi-projective varieties over , there is a degeneration theorem proved by Pierre Deligne and Blanchard for the Leray spectral sequence, which states that a smooth projective morphism of varieties gives us that the -page of the spectral sequence for degenerates, hence

Easy examples can be computed if Y is simply connected; for example a complete intersection of dimension (this is because of the Hurewicz homomorphism and the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem). In this case the local systems will have trivial monodromy, hence . For example, consider a smooth family of genus 3 curves over a smooth K3 surface. Then, we have that

giving us the -page

Example with monodromy

Another important example of a smooth projective family is the family associated to the elliptic curves

over . Here the monodromy around 0 and 1 can be computed using Picard–Lefschetz theory, giving the monodromy around by composing local monodromies.

History and connection to other spectral sequences

At the time of Leray's work, neither of the two concepts involved (spectral sequence, sheaf cohomology) had reached anything like a definitive state. Therefore it is rarely the case that Leray's result is quoted in its original form. After much work, in the seminar of Henri Cartan in particular, the modern statement was obtained, though not the general Grothendieck spectral sequence.

Earlier (1948/9) the implications for fiber bundles were extracted in a form formally identical to that of the Serre spectral sequence, which makes no use of sheaves. This treatment, however, applied to Alexander–Spanier cohomology with compact supports, as applied to proper maps of locally compact Hausdorff spaces, as the derivation of the spectral sequence required a fine sheaf of real differential graded algebras on the total space, which was obtained by pulling back the de Rham complex along an embedding into a sphere. Jean-Pierre Serre, who needed a spectral sequence in homology that applied to path space fibrations, whose total spaces are almost never locally compact, thus was unable to use the original Leray spectral sequence and so derived a related spectral sequence whose cohomological variant agrees, for a compact fiber bundle on a well-behaved space with the sequence above.

In the formulation achieved by Alexander Grothendieck by about 1957, the Leray spectral sequence is the Grothendieck spectral sequence for the composition of two derived functors.

See also

Related Research Articles

In mathematics, a sheaf is a tool for systematically tracking data attached to the open sets of a topological space and defined locally with regard to them. For example, for each open set, the data could be the ring of continuous functions defined on that open set. Such data is well behaved in that it can be restricted to smaller open sets, and also the data assigned to an open set is equivalent to all collections of compatible data assigned to collections of smaller open sets covering the original open set.

In mathematics, K-theory is, roughly speaking, the study of a ring generated by vector bundles over a topological space or scheme. In algebraic topology, it is a cohomology theory known as topological K-theory. In algebra and algebraic geometry, it is referred to as algebraic K-theory. It is also a fundamental tool in the field of operator algebras. It can be seen as the study of certain kinds of invariants of large matrices.

In mathematics, certain functors may be derived to obtain other functors closely related to the original ones. This operation, while fairly abstract, unifies a number of constructions throughout mathematics.

In mathematics, especially in algebraic geometry and the theory of complex manifolds, coherent sheaves are a class of sheaves closely linked to the geometric properties of the underlying space. The definition of coherent sheaves is made with reference to a sheaf of rings that codifies this geometric information.

In mathematics, sheaf cohomology is the application of homological algebra to analyze the global sections of a sheaf on a topological space. Broadly speaking, sheaf cohomology describes the obstructions to solving a geometric problem globally when it can be solved locally. The central work for the study of sheaf cohomology is Grothendieck's 1957 Tôhoku paper.

In mathematics, injective sheaves of abelian groups are used to construct the resolutions needed to define sheaf cohomology.

In algebraic geometry, Proj is a construction analogous to the spectrum-of-a-ring construction of affine schemes, which produces objects with the typical properties of projective spaces and projective varieties. The construction, while not functorial, is a fundamental tool in scheme theory.

In algebraic geometry, a noetherian scheme is a scheme that admits a finite covering by open affine subsets , noetherian rings. More generally, a scheme is locally noetherian if it is covered by spectra of noetherian rings. Thus, a scheme is noetherian if and only if it is locally noetherian and quasi-compact. As with noetherian rings, the concept is named after Emmy Noether.

In mathematics, in the field of homological algebra, the Grothendieck spectral sequence, introduced by Alexander Grothendieck in his Tôhoku paper, is a spectral sequence that computes the derived functors of the composition of two functors , from knowledge of the derived functors of and . Many spectral sequences in algebraic geometry are instances of the Grothendieck spectral sequence, for example the Leray spectral sequence.

In mathematics, the direct image functor is a construction in sheaf theory that generalizes the global sections functor to the relative case. It is of fundamental importance in topology and algebraic geometry. Given a sheaf F defined on a topological space X and a continuous map f: XY, we can define a new sheaf fF on Y, called the direct image sheaf or the pushforward sheaf of F along f, such that the global sections of fF is given by the global sections of F. This assignment gives rise to a functor f from the category of sheaves on X to the category of sheaves on Y, which is known as the direct image functor. Similar constructions exist in many other algebraic and geometric contexts, including that of quasi-coherent sheaves and étale sheaves on a scheme.

In mathematics, a local system on a topological space X is a tool from algebraic topology which interpolates between cohomology with coefficients in a fixed abelian group A, and general sheaf cohomology in which coefficients vary from point to point. Local coefficient systems were introduced by Norman Steenrod in 1943.

In homological algebra, the hyperhomology or hypercohomology is a generalization of (co)homology functors which takes as input not objects in an abelian category but instead chain complexes of objects, so objects in . It is a sort of cross between the derived functor cohomology of an object and the homology of a chain complex since hypercohomology corresponds to the derived global sections functor .

In mathematics, mixed Hodge modules are the culmination of Hodge theory, mixed Hodge structures, intersection cohomology, and the decomposition theorem yielding a coherent framework for discussing variations of degenerating mixed Hodge structures through the six functor formalism. Essentially, these objects are a pair of a filtered D-module together with a perverse sheaf such that the functor from the Riemann–Hilbert correspondence sends to . This makes it possible to construct a Hodge structure on intersection cohomology, one of the key problems when the subject was discovered. This was solved by Morihiko Saito who found a way to use the filtration on a coherent D-module as an analogue of the Hodge filtration for a Hodge structure. This made it possible to give a Hodge structure on an intersection cohomology sheaf, the simple objects in the Abelian category of perverse sheaves.

In algebraic geometry and algebraic topology, branches of mathematics, A1homotopy theory or motivic homotopy theory is a way to apply the techniques of algebraic topology, specifically homotopy, to algebraic varieties and, more generally, to schemes. The theory is due to Fabien Morel and Vladimir Voevodsky. The underlying idea is that it should be possible to develop a purely algebraic approach to homotopy theory by replacing the unit interval [0, 1], which is not an algebraic variety, with the affine line A1, which is. The theory has seen spectacular applications such as Voevodsky's construction of the derived category of mixed motives and the proof of the Milnor and Bloch-Kato conjectures.

In mathematics, cohomology with compact support refers to certain cohomology theories, usually with some condition requiring that cocycles should have compact support.

In algebraic topology, a branch of mathematics, the Čech-to-derived functor spectral sequence is a spectral sequence that relates Čech cohomology of a sheaf and sheaf cohomology.

In mathematics, especially in algebraic geometry and the theory of complex manifolds, coherent sheaf cohomology is a technique for producing functions with specified properties. Many geometric questions can be formulated as questions about the existence of sections of line bundles or of more general coherent sheaves; such sections can be viewed as generalized functions. Cohomology provides computable tools for producing sections, or explaining why they do not exist. It also provides invariants to distinguish one algebraic variety from another.

In mathematics, a constructible sheaf is a sheaf of abelian groups over some topological space X, such that X is the union of a finite number of locally closed subsets on each of which the sheaf is a locally constant sheaf. It has its origins in algebraic geometry, where in étale cohomology constructible sheaves are defined in a similar way. For the derived category of constructible sheaves, see a section in ℓ-adic sheaf.

Derived algebraic geometry is a branch of mathematics that generalizes algebraic geometry to a situation where commutative rings, which provide local charts, are replaced by either differential graded algebras, simplicial commutative rings or -ring spectra from algebraic topology, whose higher homotopy groups account for the non-discreteness of the structure sheaf. Grothendieck's scheme theory allows the structure sheaf to carry nilpotent elements. Derived algebraic geometry can be thought of as an extension of this idea, and provides natural settings for intersection theory of singular algebraic varieties and cotangent complexes in deformation theory, among the other applications.

In mathematics, especially algebraic geometry, the decomposition theorem of Beilinson, Bernstein and Deligne or BBD decomposition theorem is a set of results concerning the cohomology of algebraic varieties. It was originally conjectured by Gelfand and MacPherson.

References

  1. Leray, Jean (1946). "L'anneau d'homologie d'une représentation". Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences . 222: 1366–1368.
  2. Miller, Haynes (2000). "Leray in Oflag XVIIA : the origins of sheaf theory, sheaf cohomology, and spectral sequences, Jean Leray (1906–1998)" (PDF). Gaz. Math. 84: 17–34.
  3. 1 2 Dimca, Alexandru (2004). Sheaves in Topology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18868-8. ISBN   978-3-642-18868-8. OCLC   851731478.
  4. 1 2 Bott, Raoul; Tu, Loring W. Differential forms in algebraic topology. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 82. New York-Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3951-0. ISBN   978-0-387-90613-3. OCLC   7597142.
  5. Griffiths, Phillip; Harris, Joe (1978). Principles of algebraic geometry. New York: Wiley. p. 443. ISBN   0-471-32792-1. OCLC   3843444.