Luxair Flight 9642

Last updated

Luxair Flight 9642
Luxair flight 9642 crashsite.jpg
Wreckage of Flight 9642
Accident
Date6 November 2002 (2002-11-06)
Summary Pilot error aggravated by inclement weather
Site Niederanven, near Luxembourg Findel Airport, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg
49°39′21″N6°16′26″E / 49.65583°N 6.27389°E / 49.65583; 6.27389
Aircraft
Fokker 50, Luxair AN0143349.jpg
LX-LGB, the aircraft involved in the accident, in 2000
Aircraft type Fokker 50
Operator Luxair
IATA flight No.LG9642
ICAO flight No.LGL9642
Call signLUXAIR 9642
Registration LX-LGB
Flight origin Berlin Tempelhof Airport, Berlin, Germany
Destination Luxembourg Findel Airport, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg
Passengers19
Crew3
Fatalities20
Injuries2
Survivors2

Luxair Flight 9642 (LG9642/LGL9642) was a scheduled international passenger flight from Berlin Tempelhof Airport, Germany, to Luxembourg Findel Airport, Luxembourg, operated by Luxembourg national airline Luxair. On 6 November 2002, the aircraft operating the flight, a Fokker 50 registered as LX-LGB, lost control and crashed onto a field during an attempted landing at the airport. Out of 22 passengers and crew members on board, only two people survived. [1] The crash is the deadliest aviation disaster to occur in Luxembourg. [2]

Contents

Luxembourg's Administration for Technical Investigations (AET) concluded that the crash was caused by pilot error. The crew decided to accept the approach clearance that had been given by the ATC even though they had not conducted enough preparation for the landing, leading the crew to conduct a series of improvised actions. Their actions led to the override of a certain safety feature that would have prevented the propellers from entering the reverse angle, enabling the propellers to enter the reverse angle in flight and led to the lost control situation. [3] :61–62

The result of the investigation highlighted the possible safety risk regarding the protection system against an accidental deployment of reverse angle in turboprops during mid-flight, prompting Fokker to issue a mandatory modification on the safety feature. [3] :63–65

Aircraft and crew

The aircraft involved in previous livery in 1992 Luxair Fokker 50 LX-LGB LUX 1992-8-1.png
The aircraft involved in previous livery in 1992

The aircraft involved in the crash was a Fokker F50, manufactured in 1991 with a serial number of 20221. The aircraft was delivered to Luxair on the same year with a registration of LX-LGB. Equipped with PW125B engines and two Dowty propellers, it had accumulated a total of 24,068 flight cycles. According to Luxair, the aircraft had been maintained properly. The last service was conducted on 4 May. The maintenance logbook indicated that the last defect, an inoperative anti-skid system on the aircraft, had been rectified on 5 November, one day before the accident. [3] [4]

The Captain was 26-year-old Claude Poeckes, who had a total flying experience of 4,242 flight hours and 2,864 hours on type. The First Officer was 32-year-old John Arendt with a total flight hours of 1,156 and 443 hours on type. [5]

Accident

Flight 9642 was a regularly scheduled international passenger flight from Berlin-Tempelhof Airport to Luxembourg Findel Airport. On 6 November, the aircraft was scheduled to take off from Tempelhof and would be piloted by Captain Claude Poeckes and his co-pilot First Officer John Arendt. It took off from Berlin at around 07:40 a.m local time with 19 passengers and 3 crew members on board. [3]

While the aircraft was flying at its cruising altitude, at around 08:55 a.m, the pilots checked the Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS) for the weather information in Luxembourg. They discovered that the runway visual range was at 275 metres (902 ft), lower than the minimum amount of 300 metres (980 ft) that was required for the Fokker 50 to obtain before landing. The visibility in the area had deteriorated due to the presence of heavy fog. With such low visibility, the crew realised that there would be delay for the landing. They either had to wait until the weather condition began to improve by entering the holding pattern or diverting their aircraft to the alternate airport. [3]

Feeling impatient, the crew decided to continue their flight to Luxembourg as planned. After several minutes, the crew checked the ATIS information again, only to discover that the visibility had not improved. They then discussed on the possible strategies for a landing during bad weather condition but failed to reach conclusion on the matter. As no decision was taken, the approach briefing was not conducted. [3]

While First Officer Arendt was giving an address to the passengers, Captain Poeckes tried to contact Luxair officials on whether the weather had improved as a departing Cargolux jet might have cleared some of the fog in the area. To his disappointment, the airport was still covered with heavy fog. Due to the constant foggy condition, the crew were told to enter the Diekrich VOR, Findel's holding pattern. Co-pilot Arendt then announced to the passengers that the flight would enter a holding pattern first and that they would wait until the weather began to improve. [3]

As they were heading towards the pattern, the ATC suddenly radioed the crew and instructed them to descend to 3,000 feet (910 m) and to change their heading. The transmission caught them off guard. First Officer Arendt was initially confused by the transmission and asked Captain Poeckes:"Is that for us?", to which the captain responded with "yes". The crew accepted the instruction, but First Officer Arendt was still surprised by the transmission as he could be heard saying "What kind of shit is that?" [3]

Approach

The crew still did not understand the reasons for the descent that had been requested by the controller. Fearing that they had been asked to prepare for an approach, they repeatedly checked the RVR (Runway Visual Range) value with Luxair Dispatch, but the weather in Findel Airport was still below the minimum amount for the landing. They were initially feeling uncertain about whether the controller had sent such transmission for holding or for an approach. [3] :55

09:00:22Captain PoeckesWhat is the RVR at the moment?
Luxair DispatchEh, 275
09:00:38Captain Poeckes275 meters, what do we do now?
09:00:41First Officer ArendtI don't know
09:01:06First Officer ArendtYes, what do they do with us then? Holding or is it for an approach?

Afterwards, the controller sent a message that cleared the crew's confusion. The controller specifically asked Flight 9642 to conduct an approach to Findel Airport. The crew were perplexed as the weather conditions had not met the minimum criteria for a landing. Meanwhile, the ATC did not know about the required RVR information as the crew had not informed the ATC about the matter. Despite being confused, the crew accepted the controller's request anyway and started to fly their aircraft as per the controller's instructions. The crew now realized that they had been chosen as the first aircraft that would land at Findel, increasing their workload pressure. Following the transmission, the crew frantically prepared their aircraft for an approach. [3] :55

09:01:42First Officer ArendtOh gosh, they bring us in before all the others!
09:01:44First Officer ArendtThey bring us in before everybody!
09:01:58First Officer ArendtShould we switch on the seat belts?
09:02:00Captain PoeckesYes, yes. This wouldn't be a bad idea

The flight eventually levelled off at 3,000 feet (910 m) and was approaching the radio beacon ELU, the point for final approach fix. During the approach to the beacon, Captain Poeckes told First Officer Arendt that they would conduct a missed approach if the weather was still below 300 metres (980 ft). After successfully capturing the airport's ILS, the crew checked on the RVR again, only to discover that the weather had deteriorated even further. The RVR had dropped to 250 metres (820 ft). With the minimums now clearly too low, the crew finally told ATC that they would need an RVR of 300 metres (980 ft) for a landing. [3]

After rushing through the approach checklist, the aircraft finally reached ELU. They checked the RVR again and the report did not indicate any improvements. Captain Poeckes then told First Officer Arendt that they would execute a missed approach, but the aircraft kept continuing to Findel. First Officer Arendt kept checking the approach checklist and then put the ground idle stop in the off position, as it was the last action that the crew were required to do on the checklist. [3]

Captain Poeckes was not satisfied with the weather report and eventually called for a go-around at 09:04 local time. Just 10 seconds later, however, the ATC reported that the RVR had improved to 300 metres, the exact minimum amount for the landing of the Fokker 50. Immediately after this announcement, Captain Poeckes changed his mind and First Officer Arendt prepared the aircraft for landing. [3]

Crash

As they had been levelling off for quite some time after passing point ELU, the aircraft was flying a bit higher than the glideslope. To reduce their altitude faster, Captain Poeckes stated that he would try to reduce the power lever to flight idle, claiming that by doing so the aircraft would quickly descend to the required altitude. However, First Officer Arendt voiced his concern and told Captain Poeckes that such action would not be enough to slow down the aircraft. [3]

First Officer Arendt reported to the ATC that they would continue the approach to Findel. Flight 9642 was eventually cleared to land and the crew extended the landing gear. [3]

09:05:13First Officer ArendtClear to land, nine six four two
09:05:16CommentaryNoise similar to selecting gear down followed by gear extension noises
09:05:16First Officer ArendtThis will rather be...
09:05:16CommentaryNoise of increasing propeller speed
09:05:17CommentaryNoise of power levers passing through the idle position
09:05:19Captain PoeckesWhat's that?

After extending the landing gear, the propeller speed began to increase, startling the crew due to the audible noise. The aircraft's speed and altitude then rapidly dropped. The crew realised that the reverse thrust had been deployed in mid-flight and tried to save the aircraft. In an attempt to regain lift, First Officer Arendt immediately retracted the flaps and Captain Poeckes moved the thrust lever fully forward. The aircraft, however, continued to plummet towards the ground. [3]

As a last resort, the crew decided to shut down both engines. It did not stop the aircraft's rapid descent. Faced with imminent crash, the crew tried to flare as much as possible to prevent a destructive impact. [3]

09:05:28First Officer ArendtWow this was shrewd stuff!
CommentaryNoise similar to electric transfer
09:05:29Captain PoeckesOh shit!
09:05:29First Officer Arendt*Heavy breathing*
09:05:40CommentaryNoise similar to electric transfer
09:05:41ATCReady for push back next, Mike Kilo Alpha one two three
09:05:41CommentaryDouble chime
09:05:44CommentaryEnd of recording

The aircraft slammed onto terrain with its belly, crossing the Route Nationale 1 and scraped the road with its left wing. It then struck an embankment, inflicting major damage to the airframe. The aircraft bounced and both wheels and blades came off of the aircraft. The empennage and part of the right wing broke away. The aft fuselage detached and rested on its right side. The aircraft eventually came to a halt 25 metres (82 ft; 27 yd) further away. After coming to a stop, a fire began to erupt on the central portion of the crushed fuselage. [6] :22–24

Immediate aftermath

The cockpit section was not significantly affected by the post-crash fire, enabling Captain Poeckes to survive Luxair flight 9642 crashsite 3.jpg
The cockpit section was not significantly affected by the post-crash fire, enabling Captain Poeckes to survive

Flight 9642 suddenly ceased all contact with Findel Airport. Its blip had disappeared from the radar screen, prompting the controller to call the crew multiple times to confirm their condition. [7] As there was no response, the airport emergency services were alerted to a possible crash. A telephone call from a witness eventually confirmed that the aircraft had crashed near the airport. Meanwhile, at the crash site, taxi driver Guillaume Wainachter was the first to arrive. He attempted to save the passengers in the fuselage as survivors could be heard screaming loudly inside the wreckage. While trying to save the survivors, he heard a noise from the aircraft, and it immediately went up in flames in a matter of seconds. [8]

It was immediately found that the aircraft had crashed in a field 700 metres (2,300 ft; 770 yd) to the north of runway centreline. [6] The wreckage was located between the village of Niederanven and Roodt-Syr. Rescue services found several passengers had been ejected from the aircraft. One survivor had been ejected from the aircraft during the crash and was found outside. Three survivors were extricated alive from the fuselage and immediately rushed to the hospital, all of whom later succumbed to their injuries. Captain Poeckes was found trapped inside the cockpit, but he survived as the cockpit did not catch fire. Rescuers had to cut a hole to evacuate him from the wreckage. [9] [6] [3] :25–26

The fog was so thick that some nearby residents were unaware of the crash. Most of them claimed not to have seen or even heard anything when the crash occurred, and only realized that something had happened nearby when ambulances and emergency services arrived at the crash site. [10]

Due to the crash, Findel Airport was closed for more than three hours. Several flights had to be diverted to Germany and Belgium. [11] [12]

Victims

Seating chart of the aircraft Luxairlx-lgb.svg
Seating chart of the aircraft

Most of the passengers were business officials from Germany. [11] Seventeen were found dead at the crash site with five survivors, three of whom died in the hospital. By nightfall, 18 bodies out of the 20 dead were found, while the other two remained missing. The bodies were thought to be buried under the smoldering fuselage. Rescue workers were using a crane to disentangle the charred remains. [11] Amongst the passengers killed on the flight was artist Michel Majerus. [13]

Nationality [14] [15] PassengersCrewTotal
TotalKilledTotalKilledTotalKilled
France210021
Germany1515001515
Luxembourg223254
Total1918322220

Response

Following the crash, a hospital in Belgium was put on alert. A total of 300 police officers were dispatched to the crash site. Government of Luxembourg requested additional help from the Belgian government, which deployed three helicopters to the crash site and a military hospital was put on standby. [11]

Incumbent Prime Minister of Luxembourg Jean-Claude Juncker visited the site of the accident on the same day of the crash, accompanied by Luxembourgish Interior Minister Michel Wolter, Transport Minister Henri Grethen and Grand Duchess of Luxembourg Maria Teresa. An emergency meeting was eventually convened by the prime minister to investigate the crash. German Transport Minister Manfred Stolpe visited the country to meet with officials regarding the crash of Flight 9642. [11] [16]

Relatives of the victims were ushered to a special morgue to see the victims. Psychological counseling would be provided by the state for affected family members. State flags were ordered to be lowered at half-mast across the country until 10 November. A ceremonial service was held on 7 November, followed by another service which was held on 10 November on the capital's Notre-Dame cathedral. [17]

Investigation

Officials could not theorize on the possible causes of the accident during the initial aftermath of the crash. [18] They did note that the flight's destination airport was covered by autumnal fog. Nearby residents of Niederanven stated that the fog at the time of the accident was very thick, so much that nearby residents could not realize that a crash had just occurred, even though Niederanven was in close proximity to the crash site. [10]

The maintenance logbook was also clean. The aircraft was inspected by a maintenance crew on the evening before the flight. The only recurring defect was the inoperative anti-skid system, which was rectified a day before the accident. [19]

Lack of preparation

At 07:53 a.m local time, the crew of the flight established their first contact with the approach controller. While approaching the airport, the crew sought information about the visibility at the airport, to which the controller replied with the available data on the RVR. The crew were worried with the discovery as it was under the minimum amount for Fokker F50 and decided to wait within the holding pattern until the weather began to improve. This crucial information regarding the minimum visibility was not relayed to the controller and caused the controller to consider the crew of being capable to conduct an approach regardless of the RVR value. Meanwhile, the crew thought that it was going to be awhile before they managed to get a landing clearance and therefore no landing preparation was conducted. [3] :52–55

While Flight 9642 was approaching the holding pattern, the controller realized that the holding pattern had become nearly full of traffic as there were three other Luxair flights in it. The controller wanted to clear the holding pattern from being jam-packed by asking one of the flights to immediately conduct an approach. Coincidentally, Flight 9642 was the most suitable for such decision as they had not reached the holding pattern yet and by asking the crew to conduct an approach there would be lesser delay for the other aircraft. The controller then instructed the crew to start executing an approach to Findel. [3] :53,59–60

After a bit of confusion and another confirmation from the controller, the unprepared crew were taken aback by the order. They were initially certain that they were going to wait within the holding pattern, but the sudden transmission from the controller effectively cut their remaining time until landing. They quickly checked their checklist and hastily briefed the approach, in which during the course they accidentally missed some of the per procedure actions due to their time constraint. [3] :55–56

Feeling uncertain with the approach, Captain Poeckes told First Officer Arendt that they would perform a go-around if the RVR was still below the minima. First Officer Arendt, however, chose to ignore him and continued with the approach checklist, a hint of a possible crew breakdown due to the lack of preparation for the approach. Captain Poeckes eventually called for a go-around, but after an updated RVR report informed him that the weather had met the exact minimum for a landing, he immediately changed his mind and decided to continue the approach. [3] :55–56

The sudden decision from the crew to continue the approach pressed the crew to immediately capture the glide slope as the aircraft had been levelling off at 3,000 ft and they had overflown the final approach point for the airport, the exact point where pilots should start descending for the final approach. There was no known procedure for the crew to intercept the glideslope after passing the final approach point. The crew should have executed a missed approach, but instead they kept their mind to land in Findel as quickly as possible. [3] :56–57

Knowing that they were flying quite high above the glideslope, Captain Poeckes reduced the engine thrust. Eager to quickly capture the glideslope, he decided to improvise, using a skill that he had learned previously. [3] :57

Reverse range

To gain the intended speed, Captain Poeckes tried to make the engines to enter the ground range by lifting the ground range selector. By doing so, the airspeed would decrease further and, as per Poeckes's understanding, their aim to get the glideslope quickly would be attained. While this technique could be used by pilots to slow down their aircraft, it was prohibited if they were still in the air. Beyond the ground range was the reverse range, which would change the propeller pitch to reverse. The reverse pitch was usually used while the aircraft was rolling on the runway during landing. Entering this range in the air would produce massive drag forces on the aircraft and would endanger the flight. To prevent an accidental deployment of the reverse range, the aircraft was equipped with a secondary stop, a specific safety feature which was regulated by the flight idle solenoid. [3] :29–32

However, said specific feature could be overridden by a design flaw within the flight system of the Fokker F50. Fokker acknowledged that the extension of the landing gear could produce an electromagnetic interference within the aircraft's anti-skid units, causing the aircraft to think that the wheels were spinning, indicating that it was already on the ground, for a period of 30 microseconds. The brief glitch powered up the flight idle solenoids and tricked them into thinking that the aircraft was rolling on the runway, causing them to temporarily open the secondary stop feature for 16 seconds. [3] :40–41,48–49

In Flight 9642, as the aircraft was about to land, the crew extended the landing gear and configured the aircraft accordingly. The electromagnetic interference occurred and this in turn energized the flight idle solenoids, opening the secondary stop. Captain Poeckes presumably was concerned about the limited time and their current altitude and pulled the lever back even further from the ground range to the reverse range in order to capture the glideslope faster. Normally, the secondary stop would have prohibited the thrust from entering the reverse range, but as the 16 seconds activation was still in effect, the reverse thrust was engaged. [3] :40–41,48–49

The activation of the reverse thrust in mid-air caused difficulties in controlling the aircraft. The propeller speed suddenly jumped and produced sound loud enough for the pilots to be startled. The airspeed then dropped and the aircraft quickly lost lift, losing altitude rapidly. The crew attempted to save their aircraft by cutting off the fuel flows to the engines, but the aircraft continued to plunge. In a last attempt, they tried to flare as much as possible to prevent a violent impact. They knew that the reverse thrust had been deployed in mid-air, but could not rectify the problem. [3] :40–41,48–49

Design flaw

Fokker knew about the possible aircraft-induced reset of the secondary stop as early as 1988. The cause of the glitch was identified during maintenance activities in which the power-up effect of the aircraft's anti-skid system was found to be the culprit. However, due to the low probability of such incidence to occur, Fokker thought that no immediate corrective actions were required. For the reset to occur, these conditions had to be met:

In December 1994, Fokker disseminated the findings to all operators of the aircraft, including Luxair. [3] :49–50

The company had attempted to modify their anti-skid units. In 1992, a non-binding service bulletin was issued, telling operators to transport their Fokker F50 fleets for a voluntary modification on their anti-skid units, which would prevent such failure from occurring. Multiple Fokker F50 had been turned in to Fokker to undergo modifications, but the involved Luxair aircraft was not among those sent as it was not mandatory for operators to send their aircraft for an updated design. [3] :49

Conclusion

In December 2003, Luxembourgish AET published the final report. It concluded the cause of the crash as follow:

The initial cause of the accident is the crew's acceptance of the approach clearance although they were not prepared to it, namely the absence of preparation of a go-around. It led the crew to perform a series of improvised actions that ended in the prohibited override of the primary stop on the power levers and leading to an irreversible loss of control. [3]

AET

Contributing to the accident were errors concerning the implementation of a safety recommendation which had been made by the manufacturer to Fokker 50 operators. [20] [3]

The crash significantly affected all Fokker F50 aircraft that were being operated in Luxembourg. Nearly two weeks after the crash, following the discovery of the failure of the secondary stop safety feature to prevent the thrust from entering the reverse range, authorities decided to change the issued service bulletins regarding the anti-skid units from voluntary to mandatory. In May 2003, Dutch authorities announced that the modifications would be made mandatory. Every Fokker 50 in Luxembourg were subjected to compulsory modification on the anti-skid control system and should be changed accordingly after November 2003. AET also recommended Fokker to conduct review on the aircraft's current design as flaw within the aircraft could threaten the safety of flights by overriding the aircraft's safety feature. [3] :63–64

Aftermath

Memorial to the accident Luxemb Luxair Flight 9642 crash memorial 01.jpg
Memorial to the accident

A criminal prosecution was launched but was delayed until 10 October 2011. Captain Poeckes, three former Luxair executives, and three mechanics (one of whom was formally a technical director) were all charged with involuntary manslaughter and negligence. The executives were later acquitted. On 27 March 2012, the remaining defendants were all found guilty. Captain Poeckes was sentenced to 42 months (3.5 years) of probation and to pay a fine of 4,000 euros. The three mechanics were sentenced to 18 months, two years, and four years of probation respectively, and to pay fines of 2,000 to 2,500 euros. [21] In January 2014, the families of four of the victims received 21,000 to 130,000 euros in compensation. [22] In February the same year, the attorneys of the convicted appealed the court's verdict. [23] In May 2015, a court paid 310,000 euros in compensation to the families of three German victims. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

Luxair, legally Luxair S.A., Société Luxembourgeoise de Navigation Aérienne, is a flag carrier of Luxembourg with its headquarters in Munsbach, Luxembourg, and hub at Luxembourg Airport. It operates scheduled services to destinations in Europe, North Africa, the Mediterranean and the Middle East with additional charter and seasonal services. It is Luxembourg's only passenger-carrying airline offering regular, non-charter service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luxembourg Airport</span> Main airport in Luxembourg

Luxembourg Airport is the main airport in Luxembourg. Previously called Luxembourg Findel Airport due to its location at Findel, it is Luxembourg's only international airport and is the only airport in the country with a paved runway. It is located 3.25 NM east of Luxembourg City. In 2019, it handled 4.4 million passengers. It is a major cargo airport, ranking as Europe's fifth-busiest by cargo tonnage and the world's 28th-busiest in 2010. Luxair, Luxembourg's flag-carrier, and cargo airline Cargolux have their head offices on the airport property.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fokker 50</span> Regional airliner by Fokker

The Fokker 50 is a turboprop-powered airliner manufactured and supported by Dutch aircraft manufacturer Fokker. It was designed as an improved version of the successful Fokker F27 Friendship. The Fokker 60 is a stretched freighter version of the Fokker 50.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">USAir Flight 1016</span> 1994 aviation accident

USAir Flight 1016 was a regularly scheduled flight in the southeastern United States, between Columbia, South Carolina, and Charlotte, North Carolina. On July 2, 1994, the flight encountered heavy thunderstorms and microburst-induced windshear while attempting to land, and crashed into heavy trees and a private residence near the airport. The crash and ensuing fire caused 37 fatalities and seriously injured 20 others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southwest Airlines Flight 1248</span> 2005 aviation accident

Southwest Airlines Flight 1248 was a scheduled passenger flight from Baltimore, Maryland, to Chicago, Illinois, continuing on to Salt Lake City, Utah, and then to Las Vegas, Nevada. On December 8, 2005, the airplane slid off a runway at Midway Airport in Chicago while landing in a snowstorm and crashed into automobile traffic, killing a six-year-old boy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Britannia Airways Flight 226A</span> 1999 aviation accident

Britannia Airways Flight 226A was an international passenger flight from Cardiff, Wales to Girona, Spain, operated by charter airliner Britannia Airways. On 14 September 1999, the Boeing 757-204 aircraft suffered a crash landing and broke apart during a thunderstorm in Girona-Costa Brava Airport. Of the 236 passengers and nine crew on board, two were seriously injured and 41 sustained minor injuries. One of the passengers who had apparently sustained only minor injuries died five days later of unsuspected internal injuries. The aircraft involved in the crash, Boeing 757-204 registration G-BYAG, was damaged beyond economical repair and scrapped.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air Algérie Flight 702P</span> 1994 air crash in England

Air Algérie Flight 702P, named Oasis and registered 7T-VEE, was a Boeing 737 owned by Air Algérie and leased by Phoenix Aviation. On 21 December 1994, in low visibility conditions, it collided with power transmission cables and a pylon during its final approach to Coventry Airport in the United Kingdom. The aircraft subsequently overturned and damaged several houses before crashing inverted into a wooded area beyond. All five people on board were killed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southwest Airlines Flight 1455</span> Aviation accident in California, USA

Southwest Airlines Flight 1455 was a scheduled passenger flight from McCarran International Airport, Las Vegas, Nevada, to Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport, Burbank, California, that overran the runway during landing on March 5, 2000. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-3T5, registration N668SW, came to rest on a city street adjacent to a gas station. The National Transportation Safety Board found that the incident was due to the pilots attempting to land with excessive speed. They also found that the air traffic controller placed them in a position from which their only option was a go around. Two of the passengers were seriously injured, and there were many minor injuries. As a result of the incident, the airport installed an Engineered Materials Arrestor System at the east end of the incident runway. The aircraft was written off, making the incident the 10th hull loss of a Boeing 737-300. This was the first major accident in the airline's 29-year history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turkish Airlines Flight 634</span> 2003 aviation accident

Turkish Airlines Flight 634 was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Istanbul Atatürk Airport to Diyarbakır Airport in southeastern Turkey. On 8 January 2003 at 20:19 EET, the aircraft operating the flight, a British Aerospace Avro RJ100, struck the ground on final approach approximately 900 metres (3,000 ft) short of the runway threshold during inclement weather conditions. In the following collision with a slope, a post-crash fire broke out, killing 75 of the 80 occupants, including the entire crew. This is the deadliest aviation accident to involve the BAe 146.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kish Air Flight 7170</span> 2004 aviation accident

Kish Air Flight 7170 was a scheduled international passenger flight from Kish Island in Iran to Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, operated by Iranian airline Kish Air. On February 10, 2004, the aircraft serving the route, a Fokker 50, lost control and crashed onto terrain while on approach to Sharjah International Airport. A total of 43 out of 46 people on board were killed in the crash, making it the deadliest air disaster involving the Fokker 50.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Express Flight 2415</span> 1989 aviation accident

United Express Flight 2415 was a regularly scheduled flight in the northwest United States from Seattle to Pasco, Washington, operated using a BAe Jetstream 31. Late on Tuesday, December 26, 1989, Flight 2415 crashed while attempting to land at Pasco's Tri-Cities Airport, killing both pilots and all four passengers aboard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bhoja Air Flight 213</span> 2012 passenger plane crash near Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Bhoja Air Flight 213 was a domestic scheduled passenger flight operated by Pakistani private airline Bhoja Air from Karachi to Islamabad. On 20 April 2012, the Boeing 737-236A aircraft serving the route crashed in bad weather during the final approach killing all 121 passengers and 6 crew on board, it remains as the second deadliest air disaster in Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Malaysia Airlines Flight 2133</span> Fatal aviation accident in 1995

Malaysia Airlines Flight 2133 (MH2133/MAS2133) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Kota Kinabalu to Tawau, operated by Malaysia's flag carrier Malaysia Airlines. On 15 September 1995, the Fokker 50 carrying 53 people flew into a shanty town after the pilots failed to stop the aircraft while landing in Tawau, killing 32 of the 49 passengers and 2 of the 4 crew on board. This was the first hull loss of a Fokker 50.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delta Air Lines Flight 723</span> 1973 aviation accident in Massachusetts, United States

Delta Air Lines Flight 723 was a flight operated by a McDonnell Douglas DC-9 twin-engine jetliner, operating as a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Burlington, Vermont, to Logan International Airport in Boston, Massachusetts, with an intermediate stop in Manchester, New Hampshire. On July 31, 1973, at 11:08 a.m., while on an instrument landing system (ILS) instrument approach into Logan in low clouds and fog, the aircraft descended below the glidepath, struck a seawall, and crashed. All 89 of the occupants aboard were killed, including an initial survivor who died more than 4 months after the crash.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Merpati Nusantara Airlines Flight 6517</span> 2013 aviation incident

Merpati Nusantara Airlines Flight 6517 (MZ6517/MNA6517) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Bajawa to Kupang, Indonesia. On 10 June 2013, the Xian MA60 twin turboprop operating the route crashed on the runway while landing at Kupang's El Tari Airport, injuring 25 occupants, five seriously. The aircraft was severely damaged in the impact and subsequently written off.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tropical Airways Flight 1301</span> Domestic short-haul passenger flight crash

Tropical Airways Flight 1301 (TBG1301/M71301) was a domestic short-haul passenger flight, flying from Cap-Haïtien International Airport in Cap-Haïtien, Haiti to the commune of Port-de-Paix which crashed onto a sugarcane field less than 10 minutes after take off on the evening of 24 August 2003. The aircraft was a 19-seater Let L-410 Turbolet carrying 19 passengers and 2 crew. Witnesses stated that the aircraft caught fire during take-off and exploded when it hit the ground. All on board were killed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air Caraïbes Flight 1501</span> 2001 aviation incident

Air Caraïbes Flight 1501 (TX1501/FWI1501) was a scheduled international passenger flight, flying from Saint Martin Airport in the Dutch overseas territory of Sint Maarten to Saint Barthélemy Airport which was in the French overseas region of Guadeloupe at that time. The flight was operated by Air Caraïbes, a Caribbean regional airline, using a de Havilland Canada DHC-6-300 Twin Otter. On 24 March 2001, during an approach to Saint Barthélemy Airport, the DHC-6 Twin Otter banked steeply to the left and crashed into a house, killing all 19 passengers and crew on board. One person on the ground was also killed in the explosions that followed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aeroflot Flight 343</span> 1982 aviation accident

Aeroflot Flight 343 was a passenger flight from Moscow-Sheremetyevo Airport to Jorge Chávez International Airport, on a stopover at Luxembourg-Findel International Airport, that veered off the runway on 29 September 1982, fatally injuring seven occupants. The Ilyushin Il-62M operating the flight suffered a mechanical failure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brit Air Flight 5672</span> 2003 aviation incident

Brit Air Flight 5672 (AF5672) was a domestic passenger flight from Nantes Atlantique Airport to Brest-Guipavas Airport, France, which crashed on 22 June 2003. The flight was a Bombardier CRJ100ER operated by Brit Air, a regional airline which was a subsidiary of Air France. The aircraft crashed during its landing phase, striking multiple obstacles and then crashing onto a road and bursting into flames. The occupants were evacuated immediately. The captain was killed in the crash, while 23 survived. The crash was dubbed a miracle flight, as almost all of the occupants survived the crash.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aeroflot Flight 2808</span> 1992 aviation accident

Aeroflot Flight 2808 was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Mineralnye Vody to Ivanovo, both in Russia, with a stopover in Donetsk, Ukraine on 27 August 1992. While attempting to land at Ivanovo airport, the Tupolev Tu-134 crashed into a group of buildings in the village of Lebyazhy Lug. Investigators determined the cause of the accident was errors made by the crew and the air traffic controller. There were no fatalities on the ground, but all 84 people on board the flight died in the crash.

References

  1. "Info: Hotline". Berliner Morgenpost . 2 June 2008. Retrieved 1 November 2009.
  2. Ranter, Harro. "ASN Aircraft accident Fokker 50 LX-LGB Niederanven". aviation-safety.net. Aviation Safety Network . Retrieved 5 November 2019.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 "FINAL REPORT (REVISED ISSUE)" (PDF). Administration for Technical Investigations, Ministry of Transport. July 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 October 2013. Retrieved 23 July 2012.
  4. "REGISTRATION DETAILS FOR LX-LGB (LUXAIR) FOKKER 50-". Planelogger. Retrieved 9 September 2022.
  5. "Pilot Info" (PDF). mt.public.lu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 October 2013. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  6. 1 2 3 "Coordinates of Crash" (PDF). mt.public.lu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 October 2013. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  7. "Accident d'avion au Luxembourg : vingt morts" [Plane crash in Luxembourg: twenty dead] (in French). Libération. 7 November 2002. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
  8. "Der Tod im Nebel" [Death in the Fog] (in German). Der Spiegel. 6 November 2002. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
  9. "Luxembourg Plane Crash Kills 16". Voice of America. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  10. 1 2 Osborn, Andrew (6 November 2002). "Mystery as 20 die in Luxembourg plane crash". The Guardian. Retrieved 15 March 2016.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 "Luxembourg plane crashes in fog". BBC News . BBC. 6 November 2002. Archived from the original on 6 March 2016. Retrieved 26 August 2014.
  12. "Foggy Luxembourg Crash Kills 17". CBS News. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  13. Morrison, Donald (28 February 2007). "A Coming-Out Party". TIME . Archived from the original on 4 March 2007. Retrieved 1 November 2009.
  14. "Press Release 06.11.2002 08.15 pm" (Press release). Luxair. 6 November 2002. Archived from the original on 13 February 2003. Retrieved 1 November 2009.
  15. "Namelist of persons that died in aircraft accident 06.11.02". Luxair. 7 November 2002. Archived from the original on 13 February 2003. Retrieved 1 November 2009.
  16. "Le point sur le crash du Fokker de la Luxair" [Update on the Luxair Fokker crash] (in French). Les Frontaliers. 6 November 2002. Retrieved 18 September 2022.
  17. "Luxembourg crash families mourn". CNN. 7 November 2002. Retrieved 18 September 2022.
  18. "Crash relatives visit Luxembourg site". BBC. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  19. "Faa Antiskid Findings". lessonslearned.faa.gov. Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  20. "Investigation Commission On The Accident Which Occurred 6 November 2002 (Preliminary Report, January 2003)" (PDF). Government of Luxembourg. January 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 November 2011.
  21. "Urteil im Luxair-Prozess: 42 Monate Haft auf Bewährung für Piloten" [Judgment in the Luxair trial: 42 months on probation for pilots]. Wort.lu (in German). 27 March 2012. Retrieved 5 November 2019.
  22. "Nach tödlichem Luxair-Crash bekommen Angehörige Schadenersatz" [After a fatal Luxair crash, relatives receive compensation]. FOCUS Online (in German). Retrieved 5 November 2019.
  23. "Nach Luxair-Berufungsverfahren: Verteidiger gehen in Kassation" [After Luxair Appeal: Defenders go to cassation]. Wort.lu (in German). 26 February 2014. Retrieved 5 November 2019.
  24. "Luxair-Absturz mit 20 Toten: Angehörige erstreiten Schmerzensgeld" [Luxair crash with 20 dead: relatives represented pain and suffering]. Spiegel Online. 21 May 2015. Retrieved 5 November 2019.

Further reading