Lydia Foy

Last updated

Lydia Annice Foy
Lydia Foy (cropped).jpg
Foy in 2015
Born (1947-06-23) 23 June 1947 (age 76)
Midland Region, Ireland
Alma materUniversity College Dublin (bachelors degree in dental surgery, 1971)
OccupationDentist (retired)
Known forTransgender rights activism
Spouse
Anne Naughton
(m. 1977;sep. 1991)

Lydia Annice Foy is an Irish trans woman notable for leading legal challenges regarding gender recognition in Ireland. In 1992, Foy had sex reassignment surgery, and began a 20-year battle to have her birth certificate reflect her gender identity. In 2007, the Irish High Court ruled that the relevant portions of the law of the Republic of Ireland were incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, but by February 2013 the law had not been changed and she began new legal proceedings to enforce the 2007 decision. As of 15 July 2015, Ireland has passed the Gender Recognition Bill 2014. [1]

Contents

Early life and marriage

Foy is a retired dentist from Athy, County Kildare. Born in a private nursing home in the Midland Region, [2] [3] Foy had five brothers and one sister. [4]

From early childhood Foy was conscious of a feeling of 'femininity'. This continued throughout boarding school at Clongowes Wood College from 1960 to 1965. Having obtained the Leaving Certificate, Foy started pre-med studies at University College Dublin, but changed to dentistry a year later. Foy graduated with a Bachelor's degree in Dental Surgery in 1971, and began to practice as a dentist. [4]

In 1975, when living in Athlone, Foy met Anne Naughton through a music society. Naughton was a secretary from Clara, County Offaly, who was eight years younger. [3] They got engaged, and married at the Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Horseleap [3] on 28 September 1977. [4] They had two children, one born in 1978, and the other in 1980. [4]

Gender reassignment

In the 1980s Foy began to suffer physical and psychological problems, which worsened in August and September 1989, when she suffered a total collapse. She had psychiatric counselling, [5] was diagnosed a transsexual, and was prescribed a course of hormone treatment. Foy attended two further psychiatrists in England who diagnosed her as suffering from gender dysphoria. [4]

Foy then began a process of transitioning from male to female, with electrolysis, breast augmentation surgery, operations on the nose and Adams apple [4] and voice surgery. [5] On 25 July 1992, Foy underwent full, irreversible sex reassignment surgery [4] in Brighton, [3] England. This involved the removal of some external and internal genital tissues and surgical reconstruction of a vulva. [5] The Irish Eastern Health Board paid £3,000 towards the cost of the procedure. [5]

Subsequently, Foy lived entirely as a female. She had left the family home in 1990, and a judicial separation was granted on 13 December 1991. While Foy was at first granted conditional access to the children, who lived in custody of their mother, in May 1994 the Circuit Court prohibited all access. [4]

While Foy, who legally changed her first names in November 1993, was able to obtain passport, driving license, medical card and polling card in the new name, her request to amend the sex on her birth certificate was refused. [5] [6]

First court case

Foy v An t-Ard Chláraitheoir
Court High Court of Ireland
Full case nameFoy -v- An t-Ard Chláraitheoir, Ireland and the Attorney General
Decided19 October 2007
Citation(s) [2007] IEHC 470
Case history
Prior action(s)Foy v. An t-Ard Chlaraitheoir & Ors [2002] IEHC 116
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingLiam McKechnie

Foy began legal proceedings in April 1997, [7] to challenge the refusal of the Registrar General to issue her with a new birth certificate. Unemployed, Foy was represented in the action by Free Legal Advice Centres. The basis of her action was a contention that the Births and Deaths Registration (Ireland) Act 1863 did not justify the practice of using solely biological indicators existing at the time of birth to determine sex for the purposes of registration. [8] According to Foy, she had been born a "congenitally disabled woman" and the error recording her sex on her birth certificate was not only embarrassing to her but also could interfere with her constitutional rights, as she would be unable to ever choose to marry a man. [8]

The case reached the High Court in October 2000. Foy's former wife and their daughters contested her plea, claiming that it could have "an adverse effect on their succession and other rights." [2]

Judgment was reserved for nearly two years until 9 July 2002 when Mr Justice Liam McKechnie rejected Lydia Foy's challenge, stating that Foy had been born male based on medical and scientific evidence and that accordingly the registration could not be changed. He did express concern about the position of transsexuals in Ireland, however, and called on the government to urgently review the matter. [2] [9] [10]

Second court case

Just two days after the decision against Foy, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg heard a similar case (Goodwin & I v United Kingdom). Christine Goodwin, a British transsexual, had claimed that the United Kingdom's refusal to allow her to amend her birth certificate and to marry as a female violated the European Convention on Human Rights. [11] The Court declared that the UK Government had violated Article 8 and Article 12 of the convention. [12] In response, Britain passed the Gender Recognition Act 2004, providing for legal recognition of transgender persons in their new or acquired gender, and for the issuing of new birth certificates reflecting that gender. [7]

In 2005, the Foy case was sent back before the High Court by the Irish Supreme Court for further consideration. [13] In the interim Ireland had passed the European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003 to give greater effect to the European Convention on Human Rights in Irish law. Relying on this, Foy made another application for a new birth certificate in November 2005 and when this was rejected, she issued new legal proceedings in the High Court in January 2006, referring to the Goodwin decision by the European Court of Human Rights. These proceedings were consolidated with the earlier case and the matter was heard again by Mr Justice McKechnie. [14] On 19 October 2007, the court found Ireland in violation of the European Convention on Human Rights, and decided to issue the first declaration of incompatibility between Irish and European law. According to Justice Liam McKechnie, provisions of Article 8 of the Convention protecting Foy's right to respect for private life had been violated when the State failed "to provide for 'meaningful recognition' of her female identity". He also expressed frustration at the Irish government's failure to take any steps to improve the position of transsexuals following his previous judgment in 2002. [15] [16] [17]

Effect on law

Although the issues have been raised in parliamentary debate, [18] [19] no ruling has been made. The declaration of incompatibility cannot override domestic law, but does place an onus on the government to reconcile Irish and European legislation. [20]

On 5 January 2009, Thomas Hammarberg, the Human Rights Commissioner of the Council of Europe, stated with respect to the transgender community and specifically Foy that "There is no excuse for not immediately granting this community their full and unconditional human rights." [21]

Government challenge

Initially challenging the 2007 ruling, on 21 June 2010 the Irish Government withdrew its appeal and set up an inter-departmental committee on the legal recognition of transsexuals. [22] The report of this Gender Recognition Advisory Group was published in July 2011 and recommended legislation to recognise transsexuals. [23] Launching the report, the then Minister for Social Protection Joan Burton said the government would introduce gender recognition legislation as soon as possible, [24] but by February 2013 no legislation had been introduced.

Third court case

On 27 February 2013 Free Legal Advice Centres, representing Lydia Foy, announced that she had issued new proceedings in the Irish High Court seeking orders requiring the government to act on the judgment of Mr Justice McKechnie in 2007 and enable her to obtain a new birth certificate recognising her female gender. [25]

Other achievements

In 1997, Foy grew the world's largest foxglove in her garden. [26]

In 2011, she was the subject of a documentary on RTÉ Radio 1 called My name is Lydia Foy. [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

The legal status of transgender people varies greatly around the world. Some countries have enacted laws protecting the rights of transgender individuals, but others have criminalized their gender identity or expression. In many cases, transgender individuals face discrimination in employment, housing, healthcare, and other areas of life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Whittle</span> Scholar and activist

Stephen Thomas Whittle, is a British legal scholar and activist with the transgender activist group Press for Change. Since 2007, he has been Professor of Equalities Law in the School of Law at Manchester Metropolitan University. Between 2007 and 2009, he was president of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). Having been assigned female at birth, he is described as "a radical lesbian before his sex change and now a leading commentator on gender issues", who after the Gender Recognition Act 2004 came into force in April 2005, achieved legal recognition as a man and so was able to marry his female partner.

Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley) is a 1970 family law divorce case heard between November and December 1969 by the High Court of England and Wales in which Arthur Corbett sought annulment of his marriage to April Ashley. Corbett (the husband) had known at the time of the wedding that Ashley (the wife) had been registered male at birth and had undertaken sex-reassignment surgery. However, after the relationship had broken down, Corbett sought to end the marriage, his legal ground for doing so being that the marriage had been invalid, as Ashley was of the male sex.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transgender rights in Iran</span>

Transgender rights in Iran are limited, with a narrow degree of official recognition of transgender identities by the government, but with trans individuals facing very high levels of discrimination, from the law, the state, and from the wider society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in the Republic of Ireland</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in the Republic of Ireland are among the most advanced in Europe. Ireland is notable for its transformation from a country holding overwhelmingly conservative attitudes toward LGBT issues, in part due to the opposition by the Roman Catholic Church, to one holding overwhelmingly liberal views in the space of a generation. In May 2015, Ireland became the first country to legalise same-sex marriage on a national level by popular vote. The New York Times declared that the result put Ireland at the "vanguard of social change". Since July 2015, transgender people in Ireland can self-declare their gender for the purpose of updating passports, driving licences, obtaining new birth certificates, and getting married. Both male and female same-sex sexual activity have been legal in the state since 1993. Government recognition of LGBT rights in Ireland has expanded greatly over the past two decades. Homosexuality was decriminalised in 1993, and most forms of discrimination based on sexual orientation are now outlawed. Ireland also forbids incitement to hatred based on sexual orientation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christine Burns</span> British political activist

Christine Burns is a British political activist best known for her work with Press for Change and, more recently, as an internationally recognised health adviser. Burns was awarded an MBE in 2005 in recognition of her work representing transgender people. In 2011, she ranked 35th on the Independent on Sunday's annual Pink List of influential lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people in the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transgender</span> Gender identity other than sex assigned at birth

A transgender person is someone whose gender identity differs from that typically associated with the sex they were assigned at birth. Some transgender people who desire medical assistance to transition from one sex to another identify as transsexual. Transgender, often shortened as trans, is also an umbrella term; in addition to including people whose gender identity is the opposite of their assigned sex, it may also include people who are non-binary or genderqueer. Other definitions of transgender also include people who belong to a third gender, or else conceptualize transgender people as a third gender. The term may also include cross-dressers or drag kings and drag queens in some contexts. The term transgender does not have a universally accepted definition, including among researchers.

The Gender Recognition Panel is a tribunal in the United Kingdom dealing with transsexual and transgender concerns and allowing people to change their legal gender. It was founded to satisfy the Gender Recognition Act 2004, which legislates its decision-making process.

Transgender rights in Brazil include the right to change one's legal name and sex without the need of surgery or professional evaluation, and the right to sex reassignment surgery provided by Brazil's public health service, the Sistema Único de Saúde.

Transgender disenfranchisement is the prevention by bureaucratic, institutional and social barriers, of transgender individuals from voting or participating in other aspects of civic life. Transgender people may be disenfranchised if the sex indicated on their identification documents does not match their gender presentation, and they may be unable to update necessary identity documents because some governments require individuals to undergo sex reassignment surgery first, which many cannot afford, are not medical candidates for, or do not want.

Transgender rights in Australia have legal protection under federal and state/territory laws, but the requirements for gender recognition vary depending on the jurisdiction. For example, birth certificates, recognised details certificates, and driver licences are regulated by the states and territories, while Medicare and passports are matters for the Commonwealth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal recognition of non-binary gender</span>

Multiple countries legally recognize non-binary or third gender classifications. These classifications are typically based on a person's gender identity. In some countries, such classifications may only be available to intersex people, born with sex characteristics that "do not fit the typical definitions for male or female bodies."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transgender rights in the United Kingdom</span>

Transgender rights in the United Kingdom have varied significantly over time, with the British transgender community facing ongoing challenges not experienced by cisgender (cis) Britons. These include various laws and public attitudes in regards to identity documents, as well as anti-discrimination measures used by or pertaining to transgender people, in the areas of employment, education, housing and social services, amongst others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transgender rights in Ireland</span>

A citizen of Ireland is legally permitted to change the designation of their gender on government documents through self-determination. In 2015, Ireland was the fourth state in the world to permit such alterations to government documents. By May 2017, 230 people had been granted gender recognition certificates under the law. Section 16 of the Act entitles the holder of a gender recognition certificate to apply to have the certificate amended if there is a clerical error or an error of fact in the content of the certificate. Two such corrections have been made since commencement of the Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transgender rights in Germany</span>

Transgender rights in the Federal Republic of Germany are regulated by the Transsexuellengesetz since 1980, and indirectly affected by other laws like the Abstammungsrecht. The law initially required transgender people to undergo sex-reassignment surgery in order to have key identity documents changed. This has since been declared unconstitutional. The German government has pledged to replace the Transsexuellengesetz with the Selbstbestimmungsgesetz, which would remove the financial and bureaucratic hurdles necessary for legal gender and name changes. Discrimination protections on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation vary across Germany, but discrimination in employment and the provision of goods and services is in principle banned countrywide.

This article addresses the legal and regulatory history of transgender and transsexual people in the United States including case law and governmental regulatory action affecting their legal status and privileges, at the federal, state, municipal, and local level, and including military justice as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender self-identification</span> Legal concept

Gender self-identification is the concept that a person's legal sex or gender should be determined by their gender identity without any medical requirements, such as via statutory declaration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transgender history in the United Kingdom</span>

This article addresses the history of transgender people across the British Isles in the United Kingdom, the British colonies and the Kingdom of England until the present day. Transgender people were historically recognised in the UK by varying titles and cultural gender indicators, such as dress. People dressing and living differently from their sex assignment at birth and contributing to various aspects of British history and culture have been documented from the 14th century to the present day. In the 20th century, advances in medicine, social and biological sciences and transgender activism have influenced transgender life in the UK.

<i>MR and DR v An t-Ard-Chláraitheoir</i> Supreme Court of Ireland case

MR and DR v An t-Ard-Chláraitheoir [2014] IESC 60, [2014] 3 IR 533 is a reported Irish Supreme Court case decision. The Court held that the Civil Registration Act 2004 only allows the birth mother to be on the birth certificate. It was decided that children born through surrogacy will have the name of their birth mother on their birth certificate and not the mother who is going to raise them.

<i>O.R v an Tard Chlairaitheoir</i> Irish Supreme Court case

M.R. and D.R. & ors v An tArd-Chláraitheoir & ors, [2014] IESC 60 is an Irish Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Civil Registration Act 2004 only allows the birth mother to be on the birth certificate. Thus, children born through surrogacy will have the name of their birth mother on their birth certificate and not of the genetic mother, who intends to raise them.

References

  1. "Legal Gender Recognition in Ireland : Gender Recognition : TENI". www.teni.ie. Archived from the original on 1 August 2017. Retrieved 9 May 2016.
  2. 1 2 3 "Dentist in new court battle to be called a woman". Irish Independent . 18 April 2007. Archived from the original on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Quigley, Maeve (14 July 1992). "I was so desperate to be a woman I used to wear my wife's dresses as..." Sunday Mirror . Retrieved 27 February 2009.[ permanent dead link ]
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Courts Service of Ireland. "Foy -v- An t-Ard Chláraitheoir & Ors". Archived from the original on 15 June 2011. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 "Transsexual takes Court case to change birth cert (I. Examiner)". Press For Change. Archived from the original on 15 February 2009. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  6. "Ireland: Gender change on birth cert sought (Irish Times)". Press For Change. Archived from the original on 15 February 2009. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  7. 1 2 "Ireland violated transsexual's right to new birth certificate under EU law, judge rules". International Herald Tribune . 19 October 2007. Archived from the original on 16 March 2008. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  8. 1 2 "Campaigning for respect and equality for ALL trans people". Press For Change. Retrieved 27 February 2009.[ permanent dead link ]
  9. "Transsexual fails in High Court bid". RTÉ News . 9 July 2002. Archived from the original on 5 May 2008. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  10. "Foy v. An t-Ard Chlaraitheoir & Ors 2002 IEHC 116". 9 July 2002. Archived from the original on 24 July 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  11. "State to appeal judgment in Foy case to Supreme Court". The Irish Times . 1 April 2008. Archived from the original on 9 October 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  12. "ECHR Portal HTML View". Archived from the original on 26 May 2011. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  13. "Transgender dentist continues legal fight". RTÉ News . 17 April 2007. Archived from the original on 26 May 2008. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  14. "Foy v. An t-Ard Chlaraitheoir & Others [2007] IEHC 470" (http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2007/H470.html Archived 27 March 2019 at the Wayback Machine ). 19 October 2007
  15. "Foy v. An t-Ard Chlaraitheoir & Others" 2002 IEHC 116" (http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2002/116.html Archived 24 July 2012 at archive.today ). 9 July 2002.
  16. "Judge says State did not recognize female identity of woman". The Irish Times . 20 October 2007. Archived from the original on 29 October 2010. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  17. "Foy v. An t-Ard Chlaraitheoir & Others [2007] IEHC 470" (http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2007/H470.html Archived 27 March 2019 at the Wayback Machine ).
  18. "Dáil Éireann – Volume 640". 6 November 2007. Archived from the original on 7 June 2011. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  19. "Dáil Éireann – Volume 647 – Passports Bill 2007: Report Stage". 19 February 2008. Archived from the original on 7 June 2011. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  20. "Birth registration laws facing repeal after transgender ruling". Irish Independent . 15 February 2008. Archived from the original on 14 October 2008. Retrieved 27 February 2009.
  21. "Thomas Hammarberg: "Discrimination against transgender persons must no longer be tolerated"". ILGA Europe. Retrieved 27 February 2009.[ dead link ]
  22. Smith, Jamie (21 June 2010). "State drops transgender challenge". The Irish Times . Archived from the original on 21 October 2012. Retrieved 11 July 2010.
  23. "Report of the Gender Recognition Advisory Group". Department of Social Protection. 15 June 2011. Archived from the original on 24 April 2017. Retrieved 17 January 2017.
  24. Ring, Evelyn (15 July 2011). "Gender recognition legislation move 'a step along the way'". Irish Examiner. Archived from the original on 5 September 2017. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  25. "Transgender woman to sue over birth certificate delay" (http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2013/0227/1224330566731.html Archived 11 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine ). 'Irish Times'. 27 February 2013. Retrieved 2 March 2013. "Dentist in new gender legal bid" (http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/dentist-in-new-gender-legal-bid-223996.html Archived 27 March 2019 at the Wayback Machine ). Irish Examiner. 28 February 2013. Retrieved 2 March 2013.
  26. "Our world-beaters". Irish Independent . 24 November 2004. Archived from the original on 2 November 2012. Retrieved 6 July 2011.
  27. "My name is Lydia Foy". RTÉ Radio . Archived from the original on 8 July 2011. Retrieved 6 July 2011.