Michelson interferometer

Last updated
Figure 1. A basic Michelson interferometer, not including the optical source and detector. Michelson Interferometer.jpg
Figure 1. A basic Michelson interferometer, not including the optical source and detector.
This image demonstrates a simple but typical Michelson interferometer. The bright yellow line indicates the path of light. Michelson interferometer.png
This image demonstrates a simple but typical Michelson interferometer. The bright yellow line indicates the path of light.

The Michelson interferometer is a common configuration for optical interferometry and was invented by the 19/20th-century American physicist Albert Abraham Michelson. Using a beam splitter, a light source is split into two arms. Each of those light beams is reflected back toward the beamsplitter which then combines their amplitudes using the superposition principle. The resulting interference pattern that is not directed back toward the source is typically directed to some type of photoelectric detector or camera. For different applications of the interferometer, the two light paths can be with different lengths or incorporate optical elements or even materials under test.

Contents

The Michelson interferometer (among other interferometer configurations) is employed in many scientific experiments and became well known for its use by Michelson and Edward Morley in the famous Michelson–Morley experiment (1887) [1] in a configuration which would have detected the Earth's motion through the supposed luminiferous aether that most physicists at the time believed was the medium in which light waves propagated. The null result of that experiment essentially disproved the existence of such an aether, leading eventually to the special theory of relativity and the revolution in physics at the beginning of the twentieth century. In 2015, another application of the Michelson interferometer, LIGO, made the first direct observation of gravitational waves. [2] That observation confirmed an important prediction of general relativity, validating the theory's prediction of space-time distortion in the context of large scale cosmic events (known as strong field tests).

Configuration

Figure 2. Path of light in Michelson interferometer. Michelson interferometer with labels.svg
Figure 2. Path of light in Michelson interferometer.

A Michelson interferometer consists minimally of mirrors M1 & M2 and a beam splitter M (although a diffraction grating is also used [3] ). In Fig 2, a source S emits light that hits the beam splitter (in this case, a plate beamsplitter) surface M at point C. M is partially reflective, so part of the light is transmitted through to point B while some is reflected in the direction of A. Both beams recombine at point C' to produce an interference pattern incident on the detector at point E (or on the retina of a person's eye). If there is a slight angle between the two returning beams, for instance, then an imaging detector will record a sinusoidal fringe pattern as shown in Fig. 3b. If there is perfect spatial alignment between the returning beams, then there will not be any such pattern but rather a constant intensity over the beam dependent on the differential pathlength; this is difficult, requiring very precise control of the beam paths.

Fig. 2 shows use of a coherent (laser) source. Narrowband spectral light from a discharge or even white light can also be used, however to obtain significant interference contrast it is required that the differential pathlength is reduced below the coherence length of the light source. That can be only micrometers for white light, as discussed below.

If a lossless beamsplitter is employed, then one can show that optical energy is conserved. At every point on the interference pattern, the power that is not directed to the detector at E is rather present in a beam (not shown) returning in the direction of the source.

Figure 3. Formation of fringes in a Michelson interferometer Michelson interferometer fringe formation.svg
Figure 3. Formation of fringes in a Michelson interferometer
This photo shows the fringe pattern formed by the Michelson interferometer, using monochromatic light (sodium D lines). The Fringe formed by the Michelson interferometer.jpg
This photo shows the fringe pattern formed by the Michelson interferometer, using monochromatic light (sodium D lines).

As shown in Fig. 3a and 3b, the observer has a direct view of mirror M1 seen through the beam splitter, and sees a reflected image M'2 of mirror M2. The fringes can be interpreted as the result of interference between light coming from the two virtual images S'1 and S'2 of the original source S. The characteristics of the interference pattern depend on the nature of the light source and the precise orientation of the mirrors and beam splitter. In Fig. 3a, the optical elements are oriented so that S'1 and S'2 are in line with the observer, and the resulting interference pattern consists of circles centered on the normal to M1 and M'2 (fringes of equal inclination). If, as in Fig. 3b, M1 and M'2 are tilted with respect to each other, the interference fringes will generally take the shape of conic sections (hyperbolas), but if M1 and M'2 overlap, the fringes near the axis will be straight, parallel, and equally spaced (fringes of equal thickness). If S is an extended source rather than a point source as illustrated, the fringes of Fig. 3a must be observed with a telescope set at infinity, while the fringes of Fig. 3b will be localized on the mirrors. [4] : 17 

Source bandwidth

Figure 4. Michelson interferometers using a white light source Michelson interferometer using white light.png
Figure 4. Michelson interferometers using a white light source

White light has a tiny coherence length and is difficult to use in a Michelson (or Mach–Zehnder) interferometer. Even a narrowband (or "quasi-monochromatic") spectral source requires careful attention to issues of chromatic dispersion when used to illuminate an interferometer. The two optical paths must be practically equal for all wavelengths present in the source. This requirement can be met if both light paths cross an equal thickness of glass of the same dispersion. In Fig. 4a, the horizontal beam crosses the beam splitter three times, while the vertical beam crosses the beam splitter once. To equalize the dispersion, a so-called compensating plate identical to the substrate of the beam splitter may be inserted into the path of the vertical beam. [4] : 16  In Fig. 4b, we see using a cube beam splitter already equalizes the pathlengths in glass. The requirement for dispersion equalization is eliminated by using extremely narrowband light from a laser.

The extent of the fringes depends on the coherence length of the source. In Fig. 3b, the yellow sodium light used for the fringe illustration consists of a pair of closely spaced lines, D1 and D2, implying that the interference pattern will blur after several hundred fringes. Single longitudinal mode lasers are highly coherent and can produce high contrast interference with differential pathlengths of millions or even billions of wavelengths. On the other hand, using white (broadband) light, the central fringe is sharp, but away from the central fringe the fringes are colored and rapidly become indistinct to the eye.

Early experimentalists attempting to detect the Earth's velocity relative to the supposed luminiferous aether, such as Michelson and Morley (1887) [1] and Miller (1933), [5] used quasi-monochromatic light only for initial alignment and coarse path equalization of the interferometer. Thereafter they switched to white (broadband) light, since using white light interferometry they could measure the point of absolute phase equalization (rather than phase modulo 2π), thus setting the two arms' pathlengths equal. [6] [note 1] [7] [note 2] More importantly, in a white light interferometer, any subsequent "fringe jump" (differential pathlength shift of one wavelength) would always be detected.

Applications

Figure 5. Fourier transform spectroscopy. Fourier transform spectrometer.png
Figure 5. Fourier transform spectroscopy.

The Michelson interferometer configuration is used in a number of different applications.

Fourier transform spectrometer

Fig. 5 illustrates the operation of a Fourier transform spectrometer, which is essentially a Michelson interferometer with one mirror movable. (A practical Fourier transform spectrometer would substitute corner cube reflectors for the flat mirrors of the conventional Michelson interferometer, but for simplicity, the illustration does not show this.) An interferogram is generated by making measurements of the signal at many discrete positions of the moving mirror. A Fourier transform converts the interferogram into an actual spectrum. [8] Fourier transform spectrometers can offer significant advantages over dispersive (i.e., grating and prism) spectrometers under certain conditions. (1) The Michelson interferometer's detector in effect monitors all wavelengths simultaneously throughout the entire measurement. When using a noisy detector, such as at infrared wavelengths, this offers an increase in signal-to-noise ratio while using only a single detector element; (2) the interferometer does not require a limited aperture as do grating or prism spectrometers, which require the incoming light to pass through a narrow slit in order to achieve high spectral resolution. This is an advantage when the incoming light is not of a single spatial mode. [9] For more information, see Fellgett's advantage.

Twyman–Green interferometer

Figure 6. Twyman-Green interferometer. Twyman-Green interferometer.png
Figure 6. Twyman–Green interferometer.

The Twyman–Green interferometer is a variation of the Michelson interferometer used to test small optical components, invented and patented by Twyman and Green in 1916. The basic characteristics distinguishing it from the Michelson configuration are the use of a monochromatic point light source and a collimator. Michelson (1918) criticized the Twyman–Green configuration as being unsuitable for the testing of large optical components, since the available light sources had limited coherence length. Michelson pointed out that constraints on geometry forced by the limited coherence length required the use of a reference mirror of equal size to the test mirror, making the Twyman–Green impractical for many purposes. [10] Decades later, the advent of laser light sources answered Michelson's objections.

The use of a figured reference mirror in one arm allows the Twyman–Green interferometer to be used for testing various forms of optical component, such as lenses or telescope mirrors. [11] Fig. 6 illustrates a Twyman–Green interferometer set up to test a lens. A point source of monochromatic light is expanded by a diverging lens (not shown), then is collimated into a parallel beam. A convex spherical mirror is positioned so that its center of curvature coincides with the focus of the lens being tested. The emergent beam is recorded by an imaging system for analysis. [12]

Laser unequal path interferometer

The "LUPI" is a Twyman–Green interferometer that uses a coherent laser light source. The high coherence length of a laser allows unequal path lengths in the test and reference arms and permits economical use of the Twyman–Green configuration in testing large optical components. A similar scheme has been used by Tajammal M in his PhD thesis (Manchester University UK, 1995) to balance two arms of an LDA system. This system used fibre optic direction coupler.

Gravitational wave detection

Michelson interferometry is the leading method for the direct detection of gravitational waves. This involves detecting tiny strains in space itself, affecting two long arms of the interferometer unequally, due to a strong passing gravitational wave. In 2015 the first detection of gravitational waves was accomplished using the two Michelson interferometers, each with 4 km arms, which comprise the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory. [13] This was the first experimental validation of gravitational waves, predicted by Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. With the addition of the Virgo interferometer in Europe, it became possible to calculate the direction from which the gravitational waves originate, using the tiny arrival-time differences between the three detectors. [14] [15] [16] In 2020, India was constructing a fourth Michelson interferometer for gravitational wave detection.

Miscellaneous applications

Figure 7. Helioseismic Magnetic Imager (HMI) dopplergram showing the velocity of gas flows on the solar surface. Red indicates motion away from the observer, and blue indicates motion towards the observer. SDOHMIdoppler sunspot.png
Figure 7. Helioseismic Magnetic Imager (HMI) dopplergram showing the velocity of gas flows on the solar surface. Red indicates motion away from the observer, and blue indicates motion towards the observer.

Fig. 7 illustrates use of a Michelson interferometer as a tunable narrow band filter to create dopplergrams of the Sun's surface. When used as a tunable narrow band filter, Michelson interferometers exhibit a number of advantages and disadvantages when compared with competing technologies such as Fabry–Pérot interferometers or Lyot filters. Michelson interferometers have the largest field of view for a specified wavelength, and are relatively simple in operation, since tuning is via mechanical rotation of waveplates rather than via high voltage control of piezoelectric crystals or lithium niobate optical modulators as used in a Fabry–Pérot system. Compared with Lyot filters, which use birefringent elements, Michelson interferometers have a relatively low temperature sensitivity. On the negative side, Michelson interferometers have a relatively restricted wavelength range, and require use of prefilters which restrict transmittance. The reliability of Michelson interferometers has tended to favor their use in space applications, while the broad wavelength range and overall simplicity of Fabry–Pérot interferometers has favored their use in ground-based systems. [17]

Figure 8. Typical optical setup of single point OCT OCT B-Scan Setup-en.svg
Figure 8. Typical optical setup of single point OCT

Another application of the Michelson interferometer is in optical coherence tomography (OCT), a medical imaging technique using low-coherence interferometry to provide tomographic visualization of internal tissue microstructures. As seen in Fig. 8, the core of a typical OCT system is a Michelson interferometer. One interferometer arm is focused onto the tissue sample and scans the sample in an X-Y longitudinal raster pattern. The other interferometer arm is bounced off a reference mirror. Reflected light from the tissue sample is combined with reflected light from the reference. Because of the low coherence of the light source, interferometric signal is observed only over a limited depth of sample. X-Y scanning therefore records one thin optical slice of the sample at a time. By performing multiple scans, moving the reference mirror between each scan, an entire three-dimensional image of the tissue can be reconstructed. [18] [19] Recent advances have striven to combine the nanometer phase retrieval of coherent interferometry with the ranging capability of low-coherence interferometry. [20]

Others applications include delay line interferometer which convert phase modulation into amplitude modulation in DWDM networks, the characterization of high-frequency circuits, [21] [22] and low-cost THz power generation. [23]

Atmospheric and space applications

The Michelson Interferometer has played an important role in studies of the upper atmosphere, revealing temperatures and winds, employing both space-borne, and ground-based instruments, by measuring the Doppler widths and shifts in the spectra of airglow and aurora. For example, the Wind Imaging Interferometer, WINDII, [24] on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, UARS, (launched on September 12, 1991) measured the global wind and temperature patterns from 80 to 300 km by using the visible airglow emission from these altitudes as a target and employing optical Doppler interferometry to measure the small wavelength shifts of the narrow atomic and molecular airglow emission lines induced by the bulk velocity of the atmosphere carrying the emitting species. The instrument was an all-glass field-widened achromatically and thermally compensated phase-stepping Michelson interferometer, along with a bare CCD detector that imaged the airglow limb through the interferometer. A sequence of phase-stepped images was processed to derive the wind velocity for two orthogonal view directions, yielding the horizontal wind vector.

The principle of using a polarizing Michelson Interferometer as a narrow band filter was first described by Evans [25] who developed a birefringent photometer where the incoming light is split into two orthogonally polarized components by a polarizing beam splitter, sandwiched between two halves of a Michelson cube. This led to the first polarizing wide-field Michelson interferometer described by Title and Ramsey [26] which was used for solar observations; and led to the development of a refined instrument applied to measurements of oscillations in the Sun's atmosphere, employing a network of observatories around the Earth known as the Global Oscillations Network Group (GONG). [27]

Figure 9. Magnetogram (magnetic image) of the Sun showing magnetically intense areas (active regions) in black and white, as imaged by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory 417176main SDO Guide CMR Page 09 Image 0003.jpg
Figure 9. Magnetogram (magnetic image) of the Sun showing magnetically intense areas (active regions) in black and white, as imaged by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory

The Polarizing Atmospheric Michelson Interferometer, PAMI, developed by Bird et al., [28] and discussed in Spectral Imaging of the Atmosphere, [29] combines the polarization tuning technique of Title and Ramsey [26] with the Shepherd et al. [30] technique of deriving winds and temperatures from emission rate measurements at sequential path differences, but the scanning system used by PAMI is much simpler than the moving mirror systems in that it has no internal moving parts, instead scanning with a polarizer external to the interferometer. The PAMI was demonstrated in an observation campaign [31] where its performance was compared to a Fabry–Pérot spectrometer, and employed to measure E-region winds.

More recently, the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI), on the Solar Dynamics Observatory, employs two Michelson Interferometers with a polarizer and other tunable elements, to study solar variability and to characterize the Sun's interior along with the various components of magnetic activity. HMI takes high-resolution measurements of the longitudinal and vector magnetic field over the entire visible disk thus extending the capabilities of its predecessor, the SOHO's MDI instrument (See Fig. 9). [32] HMI produces data to determine the interior sources and mechanisms of solar variability and how the physical processes inside the Sun are related to surface magnetic field and activity. It also produces data to enable estimates of the coronal magnetic field for studies of variability in the extended solar atmosphere. HMI observations will help establish the relationships between the internal dynamics and magnetic activity in order to understand solar variability and its effects. [33]

In one example of the use of the MDI, Stanford scientists reported the detection of several sunspot regions in the deep interior of the Sun, 1–2 days before they appeared on the solar disc. [34] The detection of sunspots in the solar interior may thus provide valuable warnings about upcoming surface magnetic activity which could be used to improve and extend the predictions of space weather forecasts.

Technical topics

Step-phase interferometer

This is a Michelson interferometer in which the mirror in one arm is replaced with a Gires–Tournois etalon. [35] The highly dispersed wave reflected by the Gires–Tournois etalon interferes with the original wave as reflected by the other mirror. Because the phase change from the Gires–Tournois etalon is an almost step-like function of wavelength, the resulting interferometer has special characteristics. It has an application in fiber-optic communications as an optical interleaver.

Both mirrors in a Michelson interferometer can be replaced with Gires–Tournois etalons. The step-like relation of phase to wavelength is thereby more pronounced, and this can be used to construct an asymmetric optical interleaver.[ citation needed ]

Phase-conjugating interferometry

The reflection from phase-conjugating mirror of two light beams inverses their phase difference to the opposite one . For this reason the interference pattern in twin-beam interferometer changes drastically. Compared to conventional Michelson interference curve with period of half-wavelength :

where is second-order correlation function, the interference curve in phase-conjugating interferometer [36] has much longer period defined by frequency shift of reflected beams:

where visibility curve is nonzero when optical path difference exceeds coherence length of light beams. The nontrivial features of phase fluctuations in optical phase-conjugating mirror had been studied via Michelson interferometer with two independent PC-mirrors . [37] The phase-conjugating Michelson interferometry is a promising technology for coherent summation of laser amplifiers. [38] Constructive interference in an array containing beamsplitters of laser beams synchronized by phase conjugation may increase the brightness of amplified beams as . [39]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Michelson (1881) wrote, "... when they [the fringes using sodium light] were of convenient width and of maximum sharpness, the sodium flame was removed and the lamp again substituted. The screw m was then slowly turned till the bands reappeared. They were then of course colored, except the central band, which was nearly black."
  2. ↑ Shankland (1964) wrote concerning the 1881 experiment, p. 20: "The interference fringes were found by first using a sodium light source and after adjustment for maximum visibility, the source was changed to white light and the colored fringes then located. White-light fringes were employed to facilitate observation of shifts in position of the interference pattern." And concerning the 1887 experiment, p. 31: "With this new interferometer, the magnitude of the expected shift of the white-light interference pattern was 0.4 of a fringe as the instrument was rotated through an angle of 90° in the horizontal plane. (The corresponding shift in the Potsdam interferometer had been 0.04 fringe.)"

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wave interference</span> Phenomenon resulting from the superposition of two waves

In physics, interference is a phenomenon in which two coherent waves are combined by adding their intensities or displacements with due consideration for their phase difference. The resultant wave may have greater intensity or lower amplitude if the two waves are in phase or out of phase, respectively. Interference effects can be observed with all types of waves, for example, light, radio, acoustic, surface water waves, gravity waves, or matter waves as well as in loudspeakers as electrical waves.

In physics, coherence length is the propagation distance over which a coherent wave maintains a specified degree of coherence. Wave interference is strong when the paths taken by all of the interfering waves differ by less than the coherence length. A wave with a longer coherence length is closer to a perfect sinusoidal wave. Coherence length is important in holography and telecommunications engineering.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michelson–Morley experiment</span> 1887 investigation of the speed of light

The Michelson–Morley experiment was an attempt to measure the motion of the Earth relative to the luminiferous aether, a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of light waves. The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley at what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and published in November of the same year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interferometry</span> Measurement method using interference of waves

Interferometry is a technique which uses the interference of superimposed waves to extract information. Interferometry typically uses electromagnetic waves and is an important investigative technique in the fields of astronomy, fiber optics, engineering metrology, optical metrology, oceanography, seismology, spectroscopy, quantum mechanics, nuclear and particle physics, plasma physics, biomolecular interactions, surface profiling, microfluidics, mechanical stress/strain measurement, velocimetry, optometry, and making holograms.

In physics, coherence expresses the potential for two waves to interfere. Two monochromatic beams from a single source always interfere. Physical sources are not strictly monochromatic: they may be partly coherent. Beams from different sources are mutually incoherent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kennedy–Thorndike experiment</span> Modified form of the Michelson–Morley experiment, testing special relativity

The Kennedy–Thorndike experiment, first conducted in 1932 by Roy J. Kennedy and Edward M. Thorndike, is a modified form of the Michelson–Morley experimental procedure, testing special relativity. The modification is to make one arm of the classical Michelson–Morley (MM) apparatus shorter than the other one. While the Michelson–Morley experiment showed that the speed of light is independent of the orientation of the apparatus, the Kennedy–Thorndike experiment showed that it is also independent of the velocity of the apparatus in different inertial frames. It also served as a test to indirectly verify time dilation – while the negative result of the Michelson–Morley experiment can be explained by length contraction alone, the negative result of the Kennedy–Thorndike experiment requires time dilation in addition to length contraction to explain why no phase shifts will be detected while the Earth moves around the Sun. The first direct confirmation of time dilation was achieved by the Ives–Stilwell experiment. Combining the results of those three experiments, the complete Lorentz transformation can be derived.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mach–Zehnder interferometer</span> Device to determine relative phase shift

The Mach–Zehnder interferometer is a device used to determine the relative phase shift variations between two collimated beams derived by splitting light from a single source. The interferometer has been used, among other things, to measure phase shifts between the two beams caused by a sample or a change in length of one of the paths. The apparatus is named after the physicists Ludwig Mach and Ludwig Zehnder; Zehnder's proposal in an 1891 article was refined by Mach in an 1892 article. Mach–Zehnder interferometry with electrons as well as with light has been demonstrated. The versatility of the Mach–Zehnder configuration has led to its being used in a range of research topics efforts especially in fundamental quantum mechanics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sagnac effect</span> Relativistic effect due to rotation

The Sagnac effect, also called Sagnac interference, named after French physicist Georges Sagnac, is a phenomenon encountered in interferometry that is elicited by rotation. The Sagnac effect manifests itself in a setup called a ring interferometer or Sagnac interferometer. A beam of light is split and the two beams are made to follow the same path but in opposite directions. On return to the point of entry the two light beams are allowed to exit the ring and undergo interference. The relative phases of the two exiting beams, and thus the position of the interference fringes, are shifted according to the angular velocity of the apparatus. In other words, when the interferometer is at rest with respect to a nonrotating frame, the light takes the same amount of time to traverse the ring in either direction. However, when the interferometer system is spun, one beam of light has a longer path to travel than the other in order to complete one circuit of the mechanical frame, and so takes longer, resulting in a phase difference between the two beams. Georges Sagnac set up this experiment in 1913 in an attempt to prove the existence of the aether that Einstein's theory of special relativity makes superfluous.

An atom interferometer uses the wave-like nature of atoms in order to produce interference. In atom interferometers, the roles of matter and light are reversed compared to the laser based interferometers, i.e. the beam splitter and mirrors are lasers while the source emits matter waves rather than light. Atom interferometers measure the difference in phase between atomic matter waves along different paths. Matter waves are controlled an manipulated using systems of lasers. Atom interferometers have been used in tests of fundamental physics, including measurements of the gravitational constant, the fine-structure constant, and universality of free fall. Applied uses of atom interferometers include accelerometers, rotation sensors, and gravity gradiometers.

The interferometric visibility is a measure of the contrast of interference in any system subject to wave superposition. Examples include as optics, quantum mechanics, water waves, sound waves, or electrical signals. Visibility is defined as the ratio of the amplitude of the interference pattern to the sum of the powers of the individual waves. The interferometric visibility gives a practical way to measure the coherence of two waves. A theoretical definition of the coherence is given by the degree of coherence, using the notion of correlation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twyman–Green interferometer</span>

A Twyman–Green interferometer is a variant of the Michelson interferometer principally used to test optical components. It was introduced in 1918 by Frank Twyman and Arthur Green.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shearing interferometer</span>

The shearing interferometer is an extremely simple means to observe interference and to use this phenomenon to test the collimation of light beams, especially from laser sources which have a coherence length which is usually significantly longer than the thickness of the shear plate so that the basic condition for interference is fulfilled.

Lloyd's mirror is an optics experiment that was first described in 1834 by Humphrey Lloyd in the Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy. Its original goal was to provide further evidence for the wave nature of light, beyond those provided by Thomas Young and Augustin-Jean Fresnel. In the experiment, light from a monochromatic slit source reflects from a glass surface at a small angle and appears to come from a virtual source as a result. The reflected light interferes with the direct light from the source, forming interference fringes. It is the optical wave analogue to a sea interferometer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">White light scanner</span>

A white light scanner (WLS) is a device for performing surface height measurements of an object using coherence scanning interferometry (CSI) with spectrally-broadband, "white light" illumination. Different configurations of scanning interferometer may be used to measure macroscopic objects with surface profiles measuring in the centimeter range, to microscopic objects with surface profiles measuring in the micrometer range. For large-scale non-interferometric measurement systems, see structured-light 3D scanner.

Self-mixing or back-injection laser interferometry is an interferometric technique in which a part of the light reflected by a vibrating target is reflected into the laser cavity, causing a modulation both in amplitude and in frequency of the emitted optical beam. In this way, the laser becomes sensitive to the distance traveled by the reflected beam thus becoming a distance, speed or vibration sensor. The advantage compared to a traditional measurement system is a lower cost thanks to the absence of collimation optics and external photodiodes.

A common-path interferometer is a class of interferometers in which the reference beam and sample beams travel along the same path. Examples include the Sagnac interferometer, Zernike phase-contrast interferometer, and the point diffraction interferometer. A common-path interferometer is generally more robust to environmental vibrations than a "double-path interferometer" such as the Michelson interferometer or the Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Although travelling along the same path, the reference and sample beams may travel along opposite directions, or they may travel along the same direction but with the same or different polarization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">White light interferometry</span> Measurement technique

As described here, white light interferometry is a non-contact optical method for surface height measurement on 3D structures with surface profiles varying between tens of nanometers and a few centimeters. It is often used as an alternative name for coherence scanning interferometry in the context of areal surface topography instrumentation that relies on spectrally-broadband, visible-wavelength light.

In quantum physics, light is in a squeezed state if its electric field strength Ԑ for some phases has a quantum uncertainty smaller than that of a coherent state. The term squeezing thus refers to a reduced quantum uncertainty. To obey Heisenberg's uncertainty relation, a squeezed state must also have phases at which the electric field uncertainty is anti-squeezed, i.e. larger than that of a coherent state. Since 2019, the gravitational-wave observatories LIGO and Virgo employ squeezed laser light, which has significantly increased the rate of observed gravitational-wave events.

Spectral interferometry (SI) or frequency-domain interferometry is a linear technique used to measure optical pulses, with the condition that a reference pulse that was previously characterized is available. This technique provides information about the intensity and phase of the pulses. SI was first proposed by Claude Froehly and coworkers in the 1970s.

References

  1. 1 2 Albert Michelson; Edward Morley (1887). "On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether". American Journal of Science. 34 (203): 333–345. Bibcode:1887AmJS...34..333M. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-34.203.333. S2CID   124333204.
  2. ↑ Abbott, B. P.; et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (15 June 2016). "GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence". Physical Review Letters . 116 (24): 241103. arXiv: 1606.04855 . Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116x1103A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103. PMID   27367379. S2CID   118651851.
  3. ↑ Kolesnichenko, Pavel; Wittenbecher, Lukas; Zigmantas, Donatas (2020). "Fully symmetric dispersionless stable transmission-grating Michelson interferometer". Optics Express. 28 (25): 37752–37757. doi: 10.1364/OE.409185 .
  4. 1 2 Hariharan, P. (2007). Basics of Interferometry, Second Edition. Elsevier. ISBN   978-0-12-373589-8.
  5. ↑ Dayton C. Miller, "The Ether-Drift Experiment and the Determination of the Absolute Motion of the Earth," Rev. Mod. Phys. , V5, N3, pp. 203-242 (Jul 1933).
  6. ↑ Michelson, A.A. (1881). "The Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether". American Journal of Science. 22 (128): 120–129. Bibcode:1881AmJS...22..120M. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-22.128.120. S2CID   130423116.
  7. ↑ Shankland, R.S. (1964). "Michelson–Morley experiment". American Journal of Physics. 31 (1): 16–35. Bibcode:1964AmJPh..32...16S. doi:10.1119/1.1970063.
  8. ↑ "Spectrometry by Fourier transform". OPI - Optique pour l'Ingénieur. Retrieved 3 April 2012.
  9. ↑ "Michelson Interferometer Operation". Block Engineering. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
  10. ↑ Michelson, A. A. (1918). "On the Correction of Optical Surfaces". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 4 (7): 210–212. Bibcode:1918PNAS....4..210M. doi: 10.1073/pnas.4.7.210 . PMC   1091444 . PMID   16576300.
  11. ↑ Malacara, D. (2007). "Twyman–Green Interferometer". Optical Shop Testing. pp. 46–96. doi:10.1002/9780470135976.ch2. ISBN   9780470135976.
  12. ↑ "Interferential Devices – Twyman–Green Interferometer". OPI – Optique pour l'Ingénieur. Retrieved 4 April 2012.
  13. ↑ "What is an Interferometer?". LIGO Lab – Caltech. Retrieved 23 April 2018.
  14. ↑ "Gravitational Waves Detected 100 Years After Einstein's Prediction". caltech.edu. Retrieved 23 April 2018.
  15. ↑ Nature, "Dawn of a new astronomy", M. Coleman Miller, Vol 531, issue 7592, page 40, 3 March 2016
  16. ↑ The New York Times, "With Faint Chirp, Scientists Prove Einstein Correct", Dennis Overbye, February 12, 2016, page A1, New York
  17. ↑ Gary, G.A.; Balasubramaniam, K.S. (11 June 2004). "Additional Notes Concerning the Selection of a Multiple-Etalon System for ATST" (PDF). Advanced Technology Solar Telescope. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 August 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
  18. ↑ Huang, D.; Swanson, E.A.; Lin, C.P.; Schuman, J.S.; et al. (1991). "Optical Coherence Tomography" (PDF). Science. 254 (5035): 1178–81. Bibcode:1991Sci...254.1178H. doi:10.1126/science.1957169. PMC   4638169 . PMID   1957169 . Retrieved 10 April 2012.
  19. ↑ Fercher, A.F. (1996). "Optical Coherence Tomography" (PDF). Journal of Biomedical Optics. 1 (2): 157–173. Bibcode:1996JBO.....1..157F. doi:10.1117/12.231361. PMID   23014682. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 September 2018. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
  20. ↑ Olszak, A.G.; Schmit, J.; Heaton, M.G. "Interferometry: Technology and Applications" (PDF). Bruker. Retrieved 1 April 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)[ permanent dead link ]
  21. ↑ Seok, Eunyoung, et al. "A 410GHz CMOS push-push oscillator with an on-chip patch antenna." 2008 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference-Digest of Technical Papers. IEEE, 2008.| https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCC.2008.4523262
  22. ↑ Arenas, D. J.; et al. (2011). "Characterization of near-terahertz complementary metal-oxide semiconductor circuits using a Fourier-transform interferometer". Review of Scientific Instruments. 82 (10): 103106–103106–6. Bibcode:2011RScI...82j3106A. doi:10.1063/1.3647223. OSTI   1076453. PMID   22047279.
  23. ↑ Shim, Dongha, et al. "THz power generation beyond transistor fmax." RF and mm-Wave Power Generation in Silicon. Academic Press, 2016. 461-484. doi : 10.1016/B978-0-12-408052-2.00017-7
  24. ↑ Shepherd, G. G.; et al. (1993). "WINDII, the Wind Imaging Interferometer on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite". J. Geophys. Res. 98(D6): 10, 725–10, 750.
  25. ↑ Evans, J. W. (1947). "The birefringent filter". J. Opt. Soc. Am. 39 229.
  26. 1 2 Title, A. M.; Ramsey, H. E. (1980). "Improvements in birefringent filters. 6: Analog birefringent elements". Appl. Opt. 19, p. 2046 (12): 2046–2058. Bibcode:1980ApOpt..19.2046T. doi:10.1364/AO.19.002046. PMID   20221180.
  27. ↑ Harvey, J.; et al. (1996). "The Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG) Project". Science . 272 (5266): 1284–1286. Bibcode:1996Sci...272.1284H. doi:10.1126/science.272.5266.1284. PMID   8662455. S2CID   41026039.
  28. ↑ Bird, J.; et al. (1995). "A polarizing Michelson interferometer for measuring thermospheric winds". Meas. Sci. Technol. 6 (9): 1368–1378. Bibcode:1995MeScT...6.1368B. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/6/9/019. S2CID   250737166.
  29. ↑ Shepherd, G. G. (2002). Spectral Imaging of the Atmosphere. Academic Press. ISBN   0-12-639481-4.
  30. ↑ Shepherd, G. G.; et al. (1985). "WAMDII: wide angle Michelson Doppler imaging interferometer for Spacelab". Appl. Opt. 24, p. 1571.
  31. ↑ Bird, J.; G. G. Shepherd; C. A. Tepley (1995). "Comparison of lower thermospheric winds measured by a Polarizing Michelson Interferometer and a Fabry–Pérot spectrometer during the AIDA campaign". Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics . 55 (3): 313–324. Bibcode:1993JATP...55..313B. doi:10.1016/0021-9169(93)90071-6.
  32. ↑ Dean Pesnell; Kevin Addison (5 February 2010). "SDO – Solar Dynamics Observatory: SDO Instruments". NASA. Retrieved 2010-02-13.
  33. ↑ Solar Physics Research Group. "Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager Investigation". Stanford University. Retrieved 2010-02-13.
  34. ↑ Ilonidis, S.; Zhao, J.; Kosovichev, A. (2011). "Detection of Emerging Sunspot Regions in the Solar Interior". Science. 333 (6045): 993–996. Bibcode:2011Sci...333..993I. doi:10.1126/science.1206253. PMID   21852494. S2CID   19790107.
  35. ↑ F. Gires & P. Tournois (1964). "Interféromètre utilisable pour la compression d'impulsions lumineuses modulées en fréquence". Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris . 258: 6112–6115.
  36. ↑ Basov, N G; Zubarev, I G; Mironov, A B; Michailov, S I; Okulov, A Yu (1980). "Laser interferometer with wavefront reversing mirrors". Sov. Phys. JETP. 52 (5): 847. Bibcode:1980ZhETF..79.1678B.
  37. ↑ Basov, N G; Zubarev, I G; Mironov, A B; Michailov, S I; Okulov, A Yu (1980). "Phase fluctuations of the Stockes wave produced as a result of stimulated scattering of light". Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 31 (11): 645. Bibcode:1980JETPL..31..645B.
  38. ↑ Bowers, M W; Boyd, R W; Hankla, A K (1997). "Brillouin-enhanced four-wave-mixing vector phase-conjugate mirror with beam-combining capability". Optics Letters. 22 (6): 360–362. Bibcode:1997OptL...22..360B. doi:10.1364/OL.22.000360. PMID   18183201. S2CID   25530526.
  39. ↑ Okulov, A Yu (2014). "Coherent chirped pulse laser network with Mickelson phase conjugator". Applied Optics. 53 (11): 2302–2311. arXiv: 1311.6703 . Bibcode:2014ApOpt..53.2302O. doi:10.1364/AO.53.002302. PMID   24787398. S2CID   118343729.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.