Microcosm-macrocosm analogy

Last updated
From Robert Fludd, Utriusque cosmi historia, Oppenheim/Frankfurt, 1617-1621. Robert Fludd 1.gif
From Robert Fludd, Utriusque cosmi historia, Oppenheim/Frankfurt, 1617–1621.

The microcosm-macrocosm analogy (or, equivalently, macrocosm-microcosm analogy) refers to a historical view which posited a structural similarity between the human being (the microcosm, i.e., the small order or the small universe) and the cosmos as a whole (the macrocosm, i.e., the great order or the great universe). [1] Given this fundamental analogy, truths about the nature of the cosmos as a whole may be inferred from truths about human nature, and vice versa. [2]

Contents

One important corollary of this view is that the cosmos as a whole may be considered to be alive, and thus to have a mind or soul (the world soul), a position advanced by Plato in his Timaeus . [3] Moreover, this cosmic mind or soul was often thought to be divine, most notably by the Stoics and those who were influenced by them, such as the authors of the Hermetica . [4] Hence, it was sometimes inferred that the human mind or soul too was divine in nature.

Apart from this important psychological and noetic (i.e., related to the mind) application, the analogy was also applied to human physiology. [5] For example, the cosmological functions of the seven classical planets were sometimes taken to be analogous to the physiological functions of human organs, such as the heart, the spleen, the liver, the stomach, etc. [6]

The view itself is ancient, and may be found in many philosophical systems world-wide, such as for example in ancient Mesopotamia, [7] in ancient Iran, [8] or in ancient Chinese philosophy. [9] However, the terms microcosm and macrocosm refer more specifically to the analogy as it was developed in ancient Greek philosophy and its medieval and early modern descendants.

In contemporary usage, the terms microcosm and macrocosm are also employed to refer to any smaller system that is representative of a larger one, and vice versa.

History

Zeno of Citium (c. 334-262 BCE), founder of the Stoic school of philosophy. Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico (Napoli, 1969) - BEIC 6353768.jpg
Zeno of Citium (c. 334–262 BCE), founder of the Stoic school of philosophy.

Antiquity

Among ancient Greek and Hellenistic philosophers, notable proponents of the microcosm-macrocosm analogy included Anaximander (c. 610 – c. 546 BCE), [10] Plato (c. 428 or 424 – c. 348 BCE), [11] the Hippocratic authors (late fifth or early fourth century BCE and onwards), [12] and the Stoics (third century BCE and onwards). [13] In later periods, the analogy was especially prominent in the works of those philosophers who were heavily influenced by Platonic and Stoic thought, such as Philo of Alexandria (c. 20 BCE – c. 50 CE), [14] the authors of the early Greek Hermetica (c. 100 BCE – c. 300 CE), [15] and the Neoplatonists (third century CE and onwards). [16] The analogy also started occurring from an early date in religious literature, such as in the Zoroastrian encyclopedic work called the Bundahishn , or in the early Rabbinical text called the Avot de-Rabbi Nathan . [17]

Middle Ages

Medieval philosophy was generally dominated by Aristotle, who despite having been the first to coin the term "microcosm", [18] had posited a fundamental and insurmountable difference between the region below the moon (the sublunary world, consisting of the four elements) and the region above the moon (the superlunary world, consisting of a fifth element). Nevertheless, the microcosm-macrocosm analogy was adopted by a wide variety of medieval thinkers working in different linguistic traditions: the concept of microcosm was known in Arabic as ʿālam ṣaghīr, in Hebrew as olam katan, and in Latin as microcosmus or minor mundus. [19] The analogy was elaborated by alchemists such as those writing under the name of Jabir ibn Hayyan (c. 850–950 CE), [20] by the anonymous Shi'ite philosophers known as the Ikhwān al-Ṣafāʾ ("The Brethren of Purity", c. 900–1000 CE), [21] by Jewish theologians and philosophers such as Isaac Israeli (c. 832–932), Saadia Gaon (882/892–942), Ibn Gabirol (11th century), and Judah Halevi (c. 1075–1141), [22] by Victorine monks such as Godfrey of Saint Victor (born 1125, author of a treatise called Microcosmus), by the Andalusian mystic Ibn Arabi (1165–1240), [23] by the German cardinal Nicholas of Cusa (1401–1464), [24] and by numerous others.

Renaissance

Paracelsus (1494-1541) Paracelsus.jpg
Paracelsus (1494–1541)

The revival of Hermeticism and Neoplatonism in the Renaissance, both of which had reserved a prominent place for the microcosm-macrocosm analogy, also led to a marked rise in popularity of the latter. Some of the most notable proponents of the concept in this period include Marsilio Ficino (1433–1499), Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa (1486–1535), Francesco Patrizi (1529–1597), Giordano Bruno (1548–1600), and Tommaso Campanella (1568–1639). [25] It was also central to the new medical theories propounded by the Swiss physician Paracelsus (1494–1541) and his many followers, most notably Robert Fludd (1574–1637). [26] Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564) in his anatomy text De fabrica wrote that the human body "in many respects corresponds admirably to the universe and for that reason was called the little universe by the ancients." [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

Pre-Socratic philosophy, also known as early Greek philosophy, is ancient Greek philosophy before Socrates. Pre-Socratic philosophers were mostly interested in cosmology, the beginning and the substance of the universe, but the inquiries of these early philosophers spanned the workings of the natural world as well as human society, ethics, and religion. They sought explanations based on natural law rather than the actions of gods. Their work and writing has been almost entirely lost. Knowledge of their views comes from testimonia, i.e. later authors' discussions of the work of pre-Socratics. Philosophy found fertile ground in the ancient Greek world because of the close ties with neighboring civilizations and the rise of autonomous civil entities, poleis.

Chrysippus Greek Stoic philosopher

Chrysippus of Soli was a Greek Stoic philosopher. He was a native of Soli, Cilicia, but moved to Athens as a young man, where he became a pupil of Cleanthes in the Stoic school. When Cleanthes died, around 230 BC, Chrysippus became the third head of the school. A prolific writer, Chrysippus expanded the fundamental doctrines of Zeno of Citium, the founder of the school, which earned him the title of Second Founder of Stoicism.

Robert Fludd British mathematician and astrologer

Robert Fludd, also known as Robertus de Fluctibus, was a prominent English Paracelsian physician with both scientific and occult interests. He is remembered as an astrologer, mathematician, cosmologist, Qabalist and Rosicrucian.

Hermeticism Philosophy based on the teachings of Hermes Trismegistus

Hermeticism, or Hermetism, is a label used to designate a philosophical system that is primarily based on the purported teachings of Hermes Trismegistus. These teachings are contained in the various writings attributed to Hermes, which were produced over a period spanning many centuries, and may be very different in content and scope.

<i>Hermetica</i> Philosophical texts attributed to Hermes Trismegistus

The Hermetica are the philosophical texts attributed to the legendary Hellenistic figure Hermes Trismegistus. These texts may vary widely in content and purpose, but are usually subdivided into two main categories:

Euclid of Megara Greek philosopher

Euclid of Megara was a Greek Socratic philosopher who founded the Megarian school of philosophy. He was a pupil of Socrates in the late 5th century BC, and was present at his death. He held the supreme good to be one, eternal and unchangeable, and denied the existence of anything contrary to the good. Editors and translators in the Middle Ages often confused him with Euclid of Alexandria when discussing the latter's Elements.

The world soul is, according to several systems of thought, an intrinsic connection between all living things on the planet, which relates to the world in much the same way as the soul is connected to the human body. Plato adhered to this idea and it was an important component of most Neoplatonic systems:

Therefore, we may consequently state that: this world is indeed a living being endowed with a soul and intelligence ... a single visible living entity containing all other living entities, which by their nature are all related.

Correspondence (theology) Theological term referring to the relationship between two levels of existence

Correspondence is a relationship between two levels of existence. The term was coined by the 18th-century theologian Emanuel Swedenborg in his Arcana Cœlestia (1749–1756), Heaven and Hell (1758) and other works.

Microcosm-macrocosm analogy in Jewish philosophy Analogy between man and cosmos in Jewish sources

Analogies between microcosm and macrocosm are found throughout the history of Jewish philosophy. According to this analogy, there is a structural similarity between the human being and the cosmos as a whole.

Wisdom literature Genre of literature common in the ancient Near East

Wisdom literature is a genre of literature common in the ancient Near East. It consists of statements by sages and the wise that offer teachings about divinity and virtue. Although this genre uses techniques of traditional oral storytelling, it was disseminated in written form.

Axis mundi The world center in some religions and philosophies, as the connection between Heaven and Earth

In astronomy, axis mundi is the Latin term for the axis of Earth between the celestial poles.

According to ancient and medieval science, aether, also spelled æther, aither, or ether and also called quintessence, is the material that fills the region of the universe above the terrestrial sphere. The concept of aether was used in several theories to explain several natural phenomena, such as the traveling of light and gravity. In the late 19th century, physicists postulated that aether permeated all throughout space, providing a medium through which light could travel in a vacuum, but evidence for the presence of such a medium was not found in the Michelson–Morley experiment, and this result has been interpreted as meaning that no such luminiferous aether exists.

<i>The Kybalion</i> Modern Hermetic tract

The Kybalion is a book originally published in 1908 by "Three Initiates" that purports to convey the teachings of Hermes Trismegistus. A modern Hermetic tract, it has been widely influential in New Age circles since the twentieth century.

Cosmographia ("Cosmography"), also known as De mundi universitate, is a Latin philosophical allegory, dealing with the creation of the universe, by the twelfth-century author Bernardus Silvestris. In form, it is a prosimetrum, in which passages of prose alternate with verse passages in various classical meters. The philosophical basis of the work is the Platonism of contemporary philosophers associated with the cathedral school of Chartres—one of whom, Thierry of Chartres, is the dedicatee of the work. According to a marginal note in one early manuscript, the Cosmographia was recited before Pope Eugene III when he was traveling in France (1147–48).

This page is a list of topics in ancient philosophy.

Stoicism School of Hellenistic Greek philosophy

Stoicism is a school of Hellenistic philosophy founded by Zeno of Citium in Athens in the early 3rd century BC. It is a philosophy of personal ethics informed by its system of logic and its views on the natural world. According to its teachings, as social beings, the path to eudaimonia is found in accepting the moment as it presents itself, by not allowing oneself to be controlled by the desire for pleasure or by the fear of pain, by using one's mind to understand the world and to do one's part in nature's plan, and by working together and treating others fairly and justly.

Academic skepticism refers to the skeptical period of ancient Platonism dating from around 266 BC, when Arcesilaus became scholarch of the Platonic Academy, until around 90 BC, when Antiochus of Ascalon rejected skepticism, although individual philosophers, such as Favorinus and his teacher Plutarch, continued to defend skepticism after this date. Unlike the existing school of skepticism, the Pyrrhonists, they maintained that knowledge of things is impossible. Ideas or notions are never true; nevertheless, there are degrees of plausibility, and hence degrees of belief, which allow one to act. The school was characterized by its attacks on the Stoics, particularly their dogma that convincing impressions led to true knowledge. The most important Academics were Arcesilaus, Carneades, and Philo of Larissa. The most extensive ancient source of information about Academic skepticism is Academica, written by the Academic skeptic philosopher Cicero.

As above, so below Popular Neo-Hermetic maxim

"As above, so below" is a popular modern paraphrase of the second verse of the Emerald Tablet, as it appears in its most widely divulged medieval Latin translation:

Quod est superius est sicut quod inferius, et quod inferius est sicut quod est superius.

That which is above is like to that which is below, and that which is below is like to that which is above.

<i>Advayataraka Upanishad</i>

Advayataraka Upanishad is an ancient Sanskrit text and a minor Upanishad of Hinduism. It is one of the 19 Upanishads attached to the Shukla Yajurveda. It is classified as a Yoga Upanishad.

References

  1. ↑ The terms microcosm and macrocosm derive from ancient Greek μικρός κόσμος (mikrós kósmos) and μακρός κόσμος (makrós kósmos), which may mean 'small universe' and 'great universe', but whose primary meaning is 'small order' and 'great order', respectively (see wiktionary; cf. Allers 1944 , pp. 320-321, note 5).
  2. ↑ On the macrocosm and the microcosm in general, see, e.g., Conger 1922; Allers 1944; Barkan 1975.
  3. ↑ See Olerud 1951.
  4. ↑ On the Stoics, see Hahm 1977 , 63ff.; on the Hermetica, see Festugière 1944–1954 , vol. I, pp. 92-94, 125-131.
  5. ↑ See, e.g., Kranz 1938 , pp. 130–133.
  6. ↑ See the drawing shown on the right (from Robert Fludd's Utriusque cosmi historia, 1617–1621), which correlates the sun (considered to be a planet in the geocentric model) with the heart.
  7. ↑ Svärd & Nokso-Koivisto 2014.
  8. ↑ Götze 1923; Duchesne-Guillemin 1956.
  9. ↑ Raphals 2015–2020.
  10. ↑ See, e.g., Allers 1944.
  11. ↑ See especially Olerud 1951.
  12. ↑ See Kranz 1938; Schluderer 2018.
  13. ↑ See Hahm 1977 , 63ff.
  14. ↑ See, e.g., Runia 1986 , pp. 87, 133, 157, 211, 259, 278, 282, 315, 324, 339, 388, 465-466.
  15. ↑ See Festugière 1944–1954 , vol. I, pp. 92-94, 125-131.
  16. ↑ See, e.g., Wilberding 2006 , pp. 53–56.
  17. ↑ Jacobs & Broydé 1906; Kraemer 2007.
  18. ↑ Kraemer 2007 , p. 178.
  19. ↑ Kraemer 2007 , p. 178; on the Latin terminology, see Finckh 1999 , p. 12.
  20. ↑ Kraus 1942–1943 , vol. II, pp. 47, 50.
  21. ↑ See, e.g., Widengren 1980; Nokso-Koivisto 2014; Krinis 2016.
  22. ↑ Jacobs & Broydé 1906; Kraemer 2007.
  23. ↑ Aminrazavi 2009–2021.
  24. ↑ Miller 2009–2017.
  25. ↑ See the discussion in Allers 1944 , pp. 386–401.
  26. ↑ Debus 1965 , pp. 19, 41-42, 86, 114-123, et passim.
  27. ↑ O'Malley 1964 , p. 324.

Further reading

Other sources cited

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.