Paradoxa Stoicorum

Last updated
Paradoxa Stoicorum
M. Tullii Ciceronis Paradoxa Stoicorum BPL 136 H.pdf - page 6.jpg
15th century manuscript, Leiden University
Author Cicero
Country Roman Republic
Language Classical Latin
Subject Stoicism
GenrePhilosophy
Publication date
46 BCE

The Paradoxa Stoicorum (English: Stoic Paradoxes) is a work by the academic skeptic philosopher Cicero in which he attempts to explain six famous Stoic sayings that appear to go against common understanding: (1) virtue is the sole good; (2) virtue is the sole requisite for happiness; (3) all good deeds are equally virtuous and all bad deeds equally vicious; (4) all fools are mad; (5) only the wise are free, whereas all fools are enslaved; and (6) only the wise are rich.

Contents

History

The work was written sometime around 46 BC. [1] The work is dedicated to Marcus Brutus. [2] In the introduction, Cicero praises Brutus' uncle Cato the Younger who was still alive at this date. [2]

Cicero was motivated to write the work in order to re-express Stoic arguments within the language of rhetorical Latin. Cicero states his intention is to make a version of an original Greek work in a language appropriate for the mode of the Forum. [3] He defends the paradoxes with popular arguments, sometimes hardly more than a play upon words, and illustrates them with anecdotes from history. [4] It is thought that he did not regard these essays as serious works of philosophy, but rather as rhetorical exercises. [4] [5] Elsewhere Cicero criticizes these paradoxes: especially De Finibus iv. 74–77 and Pro Murena 60–66. [4]

The earliest manuscript dates are from the 9th century. [6] The Paradoxa Stoicorum is notable for being one of the first printed books. [6] In 1465 Johann Fust and Peter Schöffer printed the work together with Cicero's de Officiis having taken control of the Gutenberg press at Mainz. [6]

In the 16th century, Marcantonius Majoragio wrote a work criticising Cicero, entitled the Antiparadoxon. [7] Majoragio believed that Cicero's work was un-Socratic, and furthermore that the arguments were unskilful and false. [7]

Contents

The subject of the work is to examine a principle of Stoic thought: the paradoxes. [1] The work is concerned specifically with six of these: [5]

I: Virtue is the only good

In this book Cicero presents the Stoic classifications of what elements of life are genuinely good, and what elements are not good. There are three different qualities of something being genuinely good: righteousness (rectum), intrinsic honor or nobility (honestum), and intrinsic virtue (cum virtute). This can be understood as the inner person, and the choices and actions that they engage in.

Pleasure and wealth cannot be genuine goods because they lack the crucial properties that a genuine good should have. [3] Genuine goods should satisfy desire and make their possessor happy. [3] Spurious or apparent goods do not satisfy desires, but rather, arouse yet more desire, as well as fear that one might lose these things that they presently possess. [3] Cicero also argues that something cannot be a good if an evil person can possess it. [3] Thus wealth and pleasure cannot be a genuine good. [3]

Humans alone among all animals possess reason, and this alone allows humans to pursue the good. [5] The good therefore should be defined exclusively in rational terms and thus the moral life should be ordered according to reason. [5]

II: Virtue is sufficient for happiness

Virtue is all that is needed for happiness. [8] Happiness depends on a possession which cannot be lost, and this only applies to things within our control. [5]

III: All the vices and all virtues are equal

All good deeds are equally meritorious and all bad deeds equally heinous. [4] All virtues are equal as this corresponds to the same impulse towards the good. [5] Cicero does not attempt to defend the Stoic position of the moral equality of all offenses; instead he offers a weakened version that offenses of the same sort are equal. [3] He notes the Stoic position that all crimes are equal since they all involve the same intent to break the law, but he then argues that crimes do not bear the same penalty since the matter depends on the status of the person injured and that of the criminal. [5] Thus he ends up imposing gradations of vice based on external factors. [5]

IV: All fools are mad

There is a substantial lacuna at the beginning of this section. [3] The remaining part argues that every fool is an exile and the wise person cannot be harmed. [3] Cicero attacks an unnamed personal enemy for causing his exile. [5] The essay is thought to be a thinly veiled attack on Cicero's enemy Clodius. [4] Cicero asserts that his own exile was not a hardship since he possessed the correct Stoic wisdom and virtue. [5]

V: The sage alone is free

Only the sage is free and every fool is a slave. [8] Cicero attacks an unnamed military leader who is unworthy of command because he cannot control his passions and thus is not free. [5] The target here may be Lucullus. [4] Cicero satirizes costly luxury and affectation of connoisseurship in collecting works of art. [4] Freedom involves the rational control of one's will. Only the sage is free since he freely chooses the good. [5]

VI: Only the wise person is rich

If a rich person's wealth is measured by the quantity of their goods, then a wealthy person with no virtue is poor, since virtue is the only good. [3] People confuse reasonable needs with unreasonable desires and this leads people in power to pursue irrational passions. [5]

Editions

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeno of Citium</span> Hellenistic philosopher, founder of Stoicism (c. 334–c. 262 BC)

Zeno of Citium was a Hellenistic philosopher from Citium, Cyprus. He was the founder of the Stoic school of philosophy, which he taught in Athens from about 300 BC. Based on the moral ideas of the Cynics, Stoicism laid great emphasis on goodness and peace of mind gained from living a life of virtue in accordance with nature. It proved very popular, and flourished as one of the major schools of philosophy from the Hellenistic period through to the Roman era, and enjoyed revivals in the Renaissance as Neostoicism and in the current era as Modern Stoicism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chrysippus</span> Greek Stoic philosopher

Chrysippus of Soli was a Greek Stoic philosopher. He was a native of Soli, Cilicia, but moved to Athens as a young man, where he became a pupil of the Stoic philosopher Cleanthes. When Cleanthes died, around 230 BC, Chrysippus became the third head of the Stoic school. A prolific writer, Chrysippus expanded the fundamental doctrines of Cleanthes' mentor Zeno of Citium, the founder and first head of the school, which earned him the title of the Second Founder of Stoicism.

Eudaimonia, sometimes anglicized as eudaemonia or eudemonia, is a Greek word literally translating to the state or condition of 'good spirit', and which is commonly translated as 'happiness' or 'welfare'.

Hecato or Hecaton of Rhodes was a Greek Stoic philosopher.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panaetius</span> Ancient Greek philosopher

Panaetius of Rhodes was an ancient Greek Stoic philosopher. He was a pupil of Diogenes of Babylon and Antipater of Tarsus in Athens, before moving to Rome where he did much to introduce Stoic doctrines to the city, thanks to the patronage of Scipio Aemilianus. After the death of Scipio in 129 BC, he returned to the Stoic school in Athens, and was its last undisputed scholarch. With Panaetius, Stoicism became much more eclectic. His most famous work was his On Duties, the principal source used by Cicero in his own work of the same name.

Aristo of Chios, also spelled Ariston, was a Greek Stoic philosopher and colleague of Zeno of Citium. He outlined a system of Stoic philosophy that was, in many ways, closer to earlier Cynic philosophy. He rejected the logical and physical sides of philosophy endorsed by Zeno and emphasized ethics. Although agreeing with Zeno that Virtue was the supreme good, he rejected the idea that morally indifferent things such as health and wealth could be ranked according to whether they are naturally preferred. An important philosopher in his day, his views were eventually marginalized by Zeno's successors.

Antiochus of Ascalon was an 1st century BC Platonism philosopher who rejected skepticism and blended Stoic doctrines with Platonism as the first philosopher in the tradition of Middle Platonism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diogenes of Babylon</span> Ancient Greek Stoic philosopher

Diogenes of Babylon was a Stoic philosopher. He was the head of the Stoic school in Athens, and he was one of three philosophers sent to Rome in 155 BC. He wrote many works, but none of his writings survived, except as quotations by later writers.

<i>Tusculanae Disputationes</i> Literary work by Cicero

The Tusculanae Disputationes is a series of five books written by Cicero, around 45 BC, attempting to popularise Greek philosophy in Ancient Rome, including Stoicism. It is so called as it was reportedly written at his villa in Tusculum. His daughter had recently died and in mourning Cicero devoted himself to philosophical studies. The Tusculan Disputations consist of five books, each on a particular theme: On the contempt of death; On pain; On grief; On emotional disturbances; and whether Virtue alone is sufficient for a happy life.

Stoic passions are various forms of emotional suffering in Stoicism, a school of Hellenistic philosophy.

Antipater of Tarsus was a Stoic philosopher. He was the pupil and successor of Diogenes of Babylon as leader of the Stoic school, and was the teacher of Panaetius. He wrote works on the gods and on divination, and in ethics he took a higher moral ground than that of his teacher Diogenes.

Kathēkon is a Greek concept, forged by the founder of Stoicism, Zeno of Citium. It may be translated as "appropriate behaviour", "befitting actions", or "convenient action for nature", or also "proper function". Kathekon was translated in Latin by Cicero as officium, and by Seneca as convenentia. Kathēkonta are contrasted, in Stoic ethics, with katorthōma, roughly "perfect action"

Dionysius the Renegade, also known as Dionysius of Heraclea, was a Stoic philosopher and pupil of Zeno of Citium who, late in life, abandoned Stoicism when he became afflicted by terrible pain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stoicism</span> Philosophical system

Stoicism is a school of Hellenistic philosophy that flourished in Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. The Stoics believed that the practice of virtue is enough to achieve eudaimonia: a well-lived life. The Stoics identified the path to achieving it with a life spent practicing certain virtues in everyday life such as courage or temperance and living in accordance with nature. It was founded in the ancient Agora of Athens by Zeno of Citium around 300 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Writings of Cicero</span> Historical Roman statesman, theorist, and philosopher

The writings of Marcus Tullius Cicero constitute one of the most renowned collections of historical and philosophical work in all of classical antiquity. Cicero was a Roman politician, lawyer, orator, political theorist, philosopher, and constitutionalist who lived during the years of 106–43 BC. He held the positions of Roman senator and Roman consul (chief-magistrate) and played a critical role in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. He was extant during the rule of prominent Roman politicians, such as those of Julius Caesar, Pompey, and Marc Antony. Cicero is widely considered one of Rome's greatest orators and prose stylists.

A sage, in classical philosophy, is someone who has attained wisdom. The term has also been used interchangeably with a 'good person', and a 'virtuous person'. Among the earliest accounts of the sage begin with Empedocles' Sphairos. Horace describes the Sphairos as "Completely within itself, well-rounded and spherical, so that nothing extraneous can adhere to it, because of its smooth and polished surface." Alternatively, the sage is one who lives "according to an ideal which transcends the everyday."

<i>De finibus bonorum et malorum</i> Philosophical work on ethics by Cicero

De finibus bonorum et malorum is a Socratic dialogue by the Roman orator, politician, and Academic Skeptic philosopher Marcus Tullius Cicero. It consists of three dialogues, over five books, in which Cicero discusses the philosophical views of Epicureanism, Stoicism, and the Platonism of Antiochus of Ascalon which supports a hybrid system of Platonism, Aristotelianism. The treatise is structured so that each philosophical system is described in its own book, and then disputed in the following book. The book was developed in the summer of the year 45 BC, and was written over the course of about one and a half months. Together with the Tusculanae Quaestiones written shortly afterwards and the Academica, De finibus bonorum et malorum is one of the most extensive philosophical works of Cicero.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moral intellectualism</span> View in meta-ethics

Moral intellectualism or ethical intellectualism is a view in meta-ethics according to which genuine moral knowledge must take the form of arriving at discursive moral judgements about what one should do. One way of understanding this is that doing what is right is a reflection of what any being knows is right. However, it can also be interpreted as the understanding that a rationally consistent worldview and theoretical way of life, as exemplified by Socrates, is superior to the life devoted to a moral life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marcantonius Majoragio</span> Italian philosopher (1514–1555)

Marcantonius Majoragio (1514–1555) was a writer and philosopher, active in Northern Italy during the Renaissance period.

<i>De fato</i> Philosophical treatise written by Cicero

De Fato is a partially lost philosophical treatise written by the Roman orator Cicero in 44 BC. Only two-thirds of the work exists; the beginning and ending are missing. It takes the form of a dialogue, although it reads more like an exposition, whose interlocutors are Cicero and his friend Aulus Hirtius.

References

  1. 1 2 D Mehl (2002). C Damon; JF Miller; KS Myers (eds.). The Stoic Paradoxes according to Cicero (in) Vertis in Usum. Walter de Gruyter. p. 39. ISBN   3598777108. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2015-03-19.
  2. 1 2 W Englert (2011). "Bringing to the Light: Cicero's Paradoxa Stoicorum". Apeiron. 23 (4): 117–142. doi:10.1515/APEIRON.1990.23.4.117. S2CID   170539684.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 M.O. Webb (1985). Cicero's Paradoxica Stiocorum: A New Translation with Philosophical Commentary (PDF). Texas Tech University.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rackham, H. Cicero: De Oratore Vol. II. Loeb Classical Library. p. 252.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Colish, Marcia L. (1990). The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages: Stoicism in classical latin literature. Brill. pp. 128–131. ISBN   9004093273.Studies in the History of Christian Thought
  6. 1 2 3 Ronnick, Michele V. (1994). "The Raison d'Etre of Fust and Schoeffer's de Officiis et Paradoxa Stoicorum, 1465, 1466". In Clogan, Paul Maurice (ed.). Medievalia et Humanistica: Studies in Medieval & Renaissance Culture: Breaching Boundaries. Vol. 20. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 123–124. ISBN   0847678822.
  7. 1 2 Papy, J. (2009). "The First Christian Defender of Stoic Virtue? Justus Lipsius and Cicero's Paradoxa Stoicorum". In AAA MacDonald; ZRWM von Martels; J Riepke Veenstra (eds.). Christian Humanism: Essays in Honour of Arjo Vanderjagt. Brill. p. 139. ISBN   978-9004176317. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
  8. 1 2 S Ebbesen (2004). Steven K. Strange; Jack Zupko (eds.). Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   1139453769. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2015-03-19.