Particuliere landerijen

Last updated

The particuliere landerijen or particuliere landen (Dutch for 'private domains'; singular particuliere landerij or particuliere land), also called tanah partikelir in Indonesian, were landed domains in a feudal system of land tenure used in parts of the Java). [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] Dutch jurists described these domains as ‘sovereign’ and of comparable legal status to indirectly ruled Vorstenlanden [princely states] in the Indies subject to the Dutch Crown. [3] The lord of such a domain was called a Landheer [Dutch for 'landlord'], and by law possessed landsheerlijke rechten or hak-hak ketuanan [seigniorial jurisdiction] over the inhabitants of his domain — jurisdiction exercised elsewhere by the central government. [7] [8] [5]

Contents

History

The Dutch East India Company, which claimed to have succeeded to the rights of the ancient kings of Java, created and sold the earliest particuliere landen for the company's high-ranking officials, compradors and allies between the 1620s and its bankruptcy in 1799. [2] [5] [6] Herman Willem Daendels, Governor-General of the Dutch East Indies during the Napoleonic interregnum from 1808 to 1811, and his British successor from 1811 until 1816, Sir Stamford Raffles, oversaw a large-scale sale of government land as particuliere landen. [2] [5] The creation of these domains ceased in 1829. [9] The bulk of these particuliere landerijen were located around the colonial capital of Batavia (today known as Jakarta), in the Ommelanden of the old Residency of Batavia [Indonesian: Karesidenan Betawi], in West Java, and to a lesser extent in other parts of Java and the 'outer islands'. [4] [6] Like the princely states, the particuliere landerijen were not directly controlled by the colonial government, and so were not subjected to the notorious Cultivation System, introduced by Governor-General Johannes van den Bosch in 1830. [10]

By 1901, there existed 304 particuliere landerijen, of which 101 were European-owned, with the rest being primarily under Chinese ownership, almost exclusively by the 'Cabang Atas' gentry. [11] [12] [6] Around 800,000 peasants lived on these domains, and were subject to the rule of the Landheeren instead of the colonial government. [3] [5] [6] The particuliere landerijen were known for supposed abuses of power by the Landheeren. [2] [3] [5] A series of government ordinances were issued by the Dutch colonial government to better regulate the running of these private domains: Staatsblad 1836 No. 19 and Staatsblad 1912, No. 422. [5]

In keeping with the ‘Ethical’ policy of the early twentieth century, the Dutch colonial government devised an ambitious plan to repurchase the particuliere landen from their owners. [3] [5] [6] The motivation was to place the inhabitants of the domains on the same legal footing as other subjects of the Dutch colonial empire. [3] The government's programme of land reacquisition began in 1912, but halted during the Great Depression (1929-1939). [3] In 1935, the government founded NV Javasche Particuliere Landerijen Maatschappij ['Java Private Domains Company'], which was tasked with the acquisition of the particuliere landerijen on the open market. [3]

Although land reforms continued, the particuliere landerijen – though much-reduced in numbers and in legal powers – survived the Japanese occupation during WW II (1942-1945) and the Indonesian revolution (1945-1949). [5] In 1958, the Republic of Indonesia issued Undang-undang No. 1/1958, which formally abolished all remaining particuliere landerijen. [5]

Administration and structure

A particuliere landerij was divided into, firstly, tanah kongsi [seigniorial land] or the demesne of the Landheer, which was land retained by him for his own use; and secondly, tanah usaha, which consisted of dependent or enfeoffed holdings, held by the Landheer's tenant farmers. [5] In addition, there was also forest land which could not be claimed or worked on without the permission of the Landheer. [5] The residence of the Landheer was called a Landhuis or a rumah kongsi [seigniorial house]. [13] [14] In this context, 'Kongsi' meant 'Lord' or 'his Lordship', and was a title used by the Chinese Landheeren, who were invariably scions of the Cabang Atas gentry. [15]

Government bureaucracy in the particuliere landen was nominated and remunerated not by the central government, but by the Landheeren themselves. [16] An administrateur was appointed to oversee the management of the Landheer's tanah kongsi. [16] As the highest authority in his domain, the Landheer appointed the district heads or Camat in his domain, other bureaucrats as he saw fit and, at the lowest level, village heads who – specifically in these particuliere landerijen – went by the title of Mandor. [16] Minor crimes on the particuliere landen were adjudicated and punished by courts set up by the Landheer. [16] The Landheer was also responsible for the provision of education, health and other social services and public infrastructures for the inhabitants of the domain. [2] [3] [5]

As part of his landsheerlijke rechten, the Landheer was entitled to certain dues from his subjects, including tjoekee or contingent, which consisted of 20% of the harvest from dependent holdings worked on by his tenant farmers. [1] [7] [8] The Landheer also collected padjeg, which was his predetermined share of his tenant farmers’ harvest, fixed for a certain period of time. [1] [7] [8] The collection of all these dues was overseen by officials called Potia, who were assisted by deputies called Komitier. [16]

Also part of his landsheerlijke rechten was the Landheer's right to impose kompenian or corvee labour on his subjects, amounting to sixty days of unpaid work each year from his tenant farmers at times determined by the Landheer or his bureaucrats. [1] [16] [7] [8] Kompenian labour included work on public infrastructures, such as roads or bridges on the domain, or work on the Landheer's own tanah kongsi. [1] [16] [7] [8] By Ommelanden custom, tenant farmers were only allowed to harvest their crops after receiving the Landheer's permission. [3]

List of particuliere landerijen

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raden Saleh</span> Indonesian painter

Raden Saleh Sjarif Boestaman was a pioneering Indonesian Romantic painter of Arab-Javanese ethnicity. He was considered to be the first "modern" artist from Indonesia, and his paintings corresponded with nineteenth-century romanticism which was popular in Europe at the time. He also expressed his cultural roots and inventiveness in his work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cultivation System</span> Dutch government policy for its Dutch East Indies colony

The Cultivation System was a Dutch government policy from 1830–1870 for its Dutch East Indies colony. Requiring a portion of agricultural production to be devoted to export crops, it is referred to by Indonesian historians as tanam paksa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vorstenlanden</span> Four native states on Java, Dutch East Indies

The Vorstenlanden were four native, princely states on the island of Java in the colonial Dutch East Indies. They were nominally self-governing vassals under suzerainty of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Their political autonomy however became increasingly constrained by severe treaties and settlements. Two of these continue to exist as a princely territory within the current independent republic of Indonesia.

Karawaci is a district of Tangerang City, Banten, Indonesia. It has an area of 13.475 km² and a population of 184,388 at the 2020 Census. Lippo Karawaci, a planned community, is located here.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bekasi Regency</span> Regency in West Java, Indonesia

Bekasi Regency is a regency of West Java Province, Indonesia. Its regency seat is in the district of Central Cikarang. It is bordered by Jakarta Special Region and by Bekasi City to the west, by Bogor Regency to the south, by Karawang Regency to the east and by the Java Sea to the north.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Benteng people</span>

Benteng people are a Chinese Indonesian community of 'Peranakan' or mixed descent, native to the historic Tangerang area in the modern-day Indonesian provinces of Jakarta, Banten and West Java.

Khouw Tian Sek, Luitenant der Chinezen, popularly known as Teng Seck, was a Chinese Indonesian landlord in colonial Batavia. He is best known today as the patriarch of the prominent Khouw family of Tamboen.

Tan Liok Tiauw Sia was a prominent Chinese-Indonesian landowner, planter and industrial pioneer in the late colonial period, best known today as the last Landheer of Batoe-Tjepper, now the district of Batuceper.

Lauw Tek Lok, Luitenant der Chinezen was a high-ranking government official and landlord in Batavia, Dutch East Indies, and a member of the Lauw-Sim-Zecha family, part of Java’s Cabang Atas gentry. He is remembered today for his long tenure as Luitenant der Chinezen of Bekasi, and for his interracial marriage with Louisa Zecha.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lauw-Sim-Zecha family</span> A family of the Cabang Atas gentry

The Lauw-Sim-Zecha family is an Indonesian family of the 'Cabang Atas' or the Chinese gentry of the Dutch East Indies. They came to prominence at the start of the nineteenth century as Pachters, Landheeren (landlords) and Kapitan Cina in the colonial capital, Batavia, and in the hill station of Sukabumi, West Java. The family is of mixed Peranakan Chinese and Indo-Bohemian descent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cabang Atas</span> Chinese gentry of colonial Indonesia

The Cabang Atas —literally 'highest branch' in Indonesian—was the traditional Chinese establishment or gentry of colonial Indonesia. They were the families and descendants of the Chinese officers, high-ranking colonial civil bureaucrats with the ranks of Majoor, Kapitein and Luitenant der Chinezen. They were referred to as the baba bangsawan [‘Chinese gentry’] in Indonesian, and the ba-poco in Java Hokkien.

Oei Tjie Sien was a Chinese-born colonial Indonesian tycoon and the founder of Kian Gwan, Southeast Asia's largest conglomerate at the start of the twentieth century. He is better known as the father of Oei Tiong Ham, Majoor-titulair der Chinezen (1866–1924), who modernized and vastly expanded the Oei family's business empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Han Oen Lee</span>

Han Oen Lee, Luitenant der Chinezen (1856—1893) was a magnate of Chinese descent in the Dutch East Indies, who governed the Chinese community of Bekasi as its Luitenant der Chinezen, an important administrative post in the Dutch colonial bureaucracy. He was also the Landheer (landlord) of the particuliere land of Gaboes. Today, he is best known as the father of the late colonial statesman Hok Hoei Kan (1881—1951).

Kang Keng Tjong, also spelt Kan Keng Tiong, was a Chinese-Indonesian tycoon and one of the richest men in Batavia, capital of the Dutch East Indies.

The institution of the pacht or pacht-stelsel was a system of tax farming in the Dutch Republic and its colonial empire. In this system tax is not collected by the government, but by a private individual who has leased the right to collect the tax. In the Dutch Republic, for example, this was common practise for a long time, especially for indirect taxes. Each year, the highest bidder acquired the right to collect certain taxes; he paid a rent for this to the government, and all he collected more was for the tax tenant himself. The rationale behind this system was that by outsourcing taxation, local governments could exert less influence on collection. Also, a tenant would collect taxes more scrupulously, because it would personally benefit him.

In the Dutch East Indies, a Landheer was the lord or owner of a particuliere landerij, a private domain in a feudal system of land tenure used in parts of the colony. Dutch jurists described the legal jurisdiction of a Landheer over his domain as ‘sovereign’ and comparable to that of the rulers of indirectly ruled princely states in the Indies. By law, the Landheer possessed landsheerlijke rechten or hak-hak ketuanan [seigniorial jurisdiction] over the inhabitants of his domain — jurisdiction exercised elsewhere by the central government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oey Djie San</span>

Oey Djie San, Kapitein der Chinezen was a Chinese-Indonesian public figure, bureaucrat and landlord, best known for his role as Landheer of Karawatji and Kapitein der Chinezen of Tangerang. In the latter capacity, he headed the local Chinese civil administration in Tangerang as part of the Dutch colonial system of 'indirect rule'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oey Giok Koen</span>

Oey Giok Koen, Kapitein der Chinezen was a Chinese-Indonesian public figure, bureaucrat and Landheer, best known for his role as Kapitein der Chinezen of Tangerang and Meester Cornelis, and as one of the richest landowners in the Dutch East Indies. As Kapitein, he headed the local Chinese civil administration in Tangerang and Meester Cornelis as part of the Dutch colonial system of 'indirect rule'. In 1893, he bought the particuliere landen or private domains of Tigaraksa and Pondok Kosambi.

Oey Khe Tay, Kapitein der Chinezen was a Chinese-Indonesian bureaucrat and landlord, best known for his role as Kapitein der Chinezen of Tangerang and Landheer of Karawatji. In the former capacity, he acted as the head of the Chinese civil administration in Tangerang as part of the Dutch colonial system of ‘indirect rule’.

Tan Tiang Po, Luitenant der Chinezen, also spelled Tan Tjeng Po, was a colonial Chinese-Indonesian bureaucrat, landowner, philanthropist and the penultimate Landheer (landlord) of the domain of Batoe-Tjepper in the Dutch East Indies.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Kropveld, D. C. J. H. (1911). The Laws of Netherland East India Relating to Land: Being a Short Exposition of Their Leading Principles and Chief Provisions, and an Explanation of Dutch Terms, with Chapters on Netherland East India and Its Laws in General and on Dutch East Indian Mining Law. Stevens. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Anderson, Benedict Richard O'Gorman (2006). Java in a Time of Revolution: Occupation and Resistance, 1944-1946. Equinox Publishing. ISBN   978-979-3780-14-6 . Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cribb, Robert (2008). Gangsters and Revolutionaries: The Jakarta People's Militia and the Indonesian Revolution, 1945-1949. Singapore: Equinox Publishing. ISBN   978-979-3780-71-9 . Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  4. 1 2 Creutzberg, P. (2012). Indonesia's Export Crops 1816–1940. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN   978-94-011-6437-5 . Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Nola, Luthvi Febryka (November 2013). [jurnal.dpr.go.id "Sengketa Tanah Partikelir"]. Jurnal DPR RI. 4 (2): 183–196. Retrieved 15 July 2020.{{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help)
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kahin, Audrey (2015). Historical Dictionary of Indonesia. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN   978-0-8108-7456-5 . Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Gautama, Sudargo; Harsono, Budi (1972). Agrarian Law. Lembaga Penelitian Hukum dan Kriminologi, Universitas Padjadjaran. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Indonesia Circle. Indonesia Circle, School of Oriental and African Studies. 1996. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  9. "Particuliere landerijen - de betekenis volgens Agrarisch".
  10. Goh, Taro (1998). Communal Land Tenure in Nineteenth-century Java: The Formation of Western Images of the Eastern Village Community. Department of Anthropology, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University. ISBN   978-0-7315-3200-1 . Retrieved 17 July 2020.
  11. Dick, Howard; Sullivan, Michael; Butcher, John (1993). The Rise and Fall of Revenue Farming: Business Elites and the Emergence of the Modern State in Southeast Asia. Springer. ISBN   978-1-349-22877-5 . Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  12. Rush, James R. (2007). Opium to Java: Revenue Farming and Chinese Enterprise in Colonial Indonesia, 1860-1910. Equinox Publishing. ISBN   978-979-3780-49-8 . Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  13. Milone, Pauline Dublin (1967). "Indische Culture, and Its Relationship to Urban Life". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 9 (4): 407–426. doi:10.1017/S0010417500004618. ISSN   0010-4175. JSTOR   177686. S2CID   143944726.
  14. Heuken, Adolf (2007). Historical Sites of Jakarta. Cipta Loka Caraka. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  15. Salmon, Claudine (2006). "Women's Social Status as Reflected in Chinese Epigraphs from Insulinde (16th-20th Centuries)". Archipel. 72 (1): 157–194. doi:10.3406/arch.2006.4030.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Peratoeran baroe atas tanah-tanah particulier di tanah Djawa seblah Roelan Tjimanoek (Staatsblad 1912 No. 422). Batavia: Landsdrukkerij. 1913. p. 24.