Patrick Minford

Last updated

Patrick Minford

CBE
Patrick minford1.jpg
Patrick Minford at MSc dinner for economics students at Cardiff University in February 2008
Born (1943-05-17) 17 May 1943 (age 80)
Spouse
Rosemary Allcorn
(m. 1970)
Academic career
Institution
School or
tradition
New classical macroeconomics
Alma mater

Anthony Patrick Leslie Minford CBE (born 17 May 1943) is a British macroeconomist who is professor of applied economics at Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, a position he has held since 1997. He was Edward Gonner Professor of Applied Economics at the University of Liverpool from 1976 to 1997. In 2016, Minford was a notable member of the Economists for Brexit group which, in opposition to the consensus view of economists, [1] advocated the UK leaving the European Union and claimed large economic benefits, which did not occur. [2]

Contents

Early career

Born in Shrewsbury, Minford was educated at Horris Hill School, Winchester College, Balliol College, Oxford (BA), and the London School of Economics (MSc; PhD). [3] He is the elder brother of John Minford, who is an academic and translator of Classical Chinese. He worked at the Ministry of Overseas Development and then as an economic adviser to the Ministry of Finance of Malawi. He then took a position as an economic adviser to HM Treasury's External Division. [4] He was appointed as economics fellow at Manchester University in 1974, becoming editor at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research in 1975, where he began to build the so-called Liverpool Model with Kent Matthews.

Academic research

Minford and his research team at the University of Liverpool created the Liverpool Model, the first operational rational expectations model of any economy. [5] [6] [7] [8] This work was concurrent with the early efforts of Fair and Anderson [9] to simulate large nonlinear rational expectations models; it was the first to apply the extended path algorithm (see Fair and Taylor) [10] to a full macro model estimated under rational expectations; and was at the forefront of what came to be known as the 'rational expectations revolution'. At this time adaptive expectations was the dominant model of expectations formation and rational expectations was greeted with incredulity. [11] Other work focused on the exchange rate, carrying out model simulations to evaluate the role of floating versus various fixed rate proposals. [12]

More recently, work by Minford and co-authors at Cardiff has focused on indirect inference methods and numerous applied studies of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models. These examine modern controversies including bank regulation, quantitative easing, and monetary policy more generally. [13] [14] Recent monetary policy proposals suggested by this research are the introduction of price level targeting and nominal GDP targeting. [15]

Policy impact

Minford gained prominence in 1981 when 364 leading economists published a statement criticising Margaret Thatcher's economic policies; Minford replied by defending the Government in The Times . Thatcher subsequently wrote a letter to Minford to congratulate him. Minford was a supporter of the theories of Milton Friedman, a prominent member of the Mont Pelerin Society (MPS) founded in 1947 by a group of 36 scholars meeting in Mont Pelerin, Switzerland.

Rational expectations work at Liverpool was used to help craft 1980s Conservative Government policies on inflation (UK monetarism and its link with fiscal policy). [16] [17] Work by Minford's team at Liverpool was also influential on unemployment policy, especially labour market liberalisation, where the Liverpool Model was the first model to develop a 'supply side' designed to explain the underlying trend or 'natural' unemployment rate. [18] [19] Minford said in November 2015 that running simulations of leaving that EU that "the first thing that comes out is an 8% drop the cost of living on day one." [20] Although this did not occur, Minford blames the volatility the economy since Brexit for making it difficult to find the impact. [21]

Work by Minford’s Liverpool team on exchange rates was influential in the 1990s Exchange Rate Mechanism debate and the 2000s debate over joining the euro. [22] [23] Minford was against Nigel Lawson's policy of pound sterling shadowing the Deutschmark. He was also against Britain joining the European Exchange Rate Mechanism because he thought it was having a bad effect on recovering from recession and keeping down interest rates. [24]

A confirmed eurosceptic, he is a supporter of the Better Off Out campaign to leave the European Union because he believes that the net economic costs to Britain of its policies are substantial. He argues that they are in most respects contrary to free market principles and that British citizens had no power to alter them. [25] In 2016, Minford was a notable member of the Economists for Brexit group which supported the referendum campaign for the UK to leave the European Union. [26] He believes that Brexit could increase GDP by 6.8%, [27] [28] and could reduce prices for British consumers. [29]

Minford favoured the Community Charge or poll tax as a way of keeping down local government spending to levels chosen by local citizens. [30] In 1988 he was appointed a board member of the Merseyside Development Corporation but resigned, saying it had a negative effect on job creation. He is on the advisory council of Reform. [31]

In the media

Minford was interviewed about the rise of Thatcherism for the 2006 BBC TV documentary series Tory! Tory! Tory! Minford was also a guest at the funeral of Margaret Thatcher in 2013. [32]

Honours

Minford was appointed Commander of the Order of the British Empire in the 1996 New Year Honours for services to economics. [33]

Publications

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macroeconomics</span> Study of an economy as a whole

Macroeconomics is a branch of economics that deals with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an economy as a whole. This includes regional, national, and global economies. Macroeconomists study topics such as output/GDP and national income, unemployment, price indices and inflation, consumption, saving, investment, energy, international trade, and international finance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inflation</span> Devaluation of currency over a period of time

In economics, inflation is a general increase of the prices of goods and services in an economy. This is usually measured using the consumer price index (CPI). When the general price level rises, each unit of currency buys fewer goods and services; consequently, inflation corresponds to a reduction in the purchasing power of money. The opposite of CPI inflation is deflation, a decrease in the general price level of goods and services. The common measure of inflation is the inflation rate, the annualized percentage change in a general price index. As prices faced by households do not all increase at the same rate, the consumer price index (CPI) is often used for this purpose.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monetarism</span> School of thought in monetary economics

Monetarism is a school of thought in monetary economics that emphasizes the role of policy-makers in controlling the amount of money in circulation. It gained prominence in the 1970s, but was mostly abandoned as a practical guidance to monetary policy during the following decade because the strategy was found to not work very well in practice.

Rational expectations is an economic theory used to explain how individuals make predictions about the future based on all available information. It states that individuals will also learn from past trends and experiences in order to make the best possible prediction about what will happen. They could be wrong sometimes, but that, on average, they will be correct.

New Keynesian economics is a school of macroeconomics that strives to provide microeconomic foundations for Keynesian economics. It developed partly as a response to criticisms of Keynesian macroeconomics by adherents of new classical macroeconomics.

The Phillips curve is an economic model, named after Bill Phillips, that correlates reduced unemployment with increasing wages in an economy. While Phillips did not directly link employment and inflation, this was a trivial deduction from his statistical findings. Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow made the connection explicit and subsequently Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps put the theoretical structure in place.

A macroeconomic model is an analytical tool designed to describe the operation of the problems of economy of a country or a region. These models are usually designed to examine the comparative statics and dynamics of aggregate quantities such as the total amount of goods and services produced, total income earned, the level of employment of productive resources, and the level of prices.

Neutrality of money is the idea that a change in the stock of money affects only nominal variables in the economy such as prices, wages, and exchange rates, with no effect on real variables, like employment, real GDP, and real consumption. Neutrality of money is an important idea in classical economics and is related to the classical dichotomy. It implies that the central bank does not affect the real economy by creating money. Instead, any increase in the supply of money would be offset by a proportional rise in prices and wages. This assumption underlies some mainstream macroeconomic models. Others like monetarism view money as being neutral only in the long run.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John B. Taylor</span> American economist (born 1946).

John Brian Taylor is the Mary and Robert Raymond Professor of Economics at Stanford University, and the George P. Shultz Senior Fellow in Economics at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas J. Sargent</span> American economist

Thomas John Sargent is an American economist and the W.R. Berkley Professor of Economics and Business at New York University. He specializes in the fields of macroeconomics, monetary economics, and time series econometrics. As of 2020, he ranks as the 29th most cited economist in the world. He was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 2011 together with Christopher A. Sims for their "empirical research on cause and effect in the macroeconomy".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edmund Phelps</span> American economist

Edmund Strother Phelps is an American economist and the recipient of the 2006 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.

The policy-ineffectiveness proposition (PIP) is a new classical theory proposed in 1975 by Thomas J. Sargent and Neil Wallace based upon the theory of rational expectations, which posits that monetary policy cannot systematically manage the levels of output and employment in the economy.

David Ernest William Laidler is an English/Canadian economist who has been one of the foremost scholars of monetarism. He published major economics journal articles on the topic in the late 1960s and early 1970s. His book, The Demand for Money, was published in four editions from 1969 through 1993, initially setting forth the stability of the relationship between income and the demand for money and later taking into consideration the effects of legal, technological, and institutional changes on the demand for money. The book has been translated into French, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, and Chinese.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Georgios Alogoskoufis</span> Greek academic and politician

Georgios Alogoskoufis is a professor of economics at the Athens University of Economics and Business since 1990. He was a member of the Hellenic Parliament from September 1996 till October 2009 and served as Greece's Minister of Economy and Finance from March 2004 till January 2009.

Karl Brunner was a Swiss economist.

Phillip David Cagan was an American scholar and author. He was Professor of Economics Emeritus at Columbia University.

The neoclassical synthesis (NCS), neoclassical–Keynesian synthesis, or just neo-Keynesianism was a neoclassical economics academic movement and paradigm in economics that worked towards reconciling the macroeconomic thought of John Maynard Keynes in his book The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936). It was formulated most notably by John Hicks (1937), Franco Modigliani (1944), and Paul Samuelson (1948), who dominated economics in the post-war period and formed the mainstream of macroeconomic thought in the 1950s, 60s, and 70s.

New classical macroeconomics, sometimes simply called new classical economics, is a school of thought in macroeconomics that builds its analysis entirely on a neoclassical framework. Specifically, it emphasizes the importance of rigorous foundations based on microeconomics, especially rational expectations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of macroeconomic thought</span>

Macroeconomic theory has its origins in the study of business cycles and monetary theory. In general, early theorists believed monetary factors could not affect real factors such as real output. John Maynard Keynes attacked some of these "classical" theories and produced a general theory that described the whole economy in terms of aggregates rather than individual, microeconomic parts. Attempting to explain unemployment and recessions, he noticed the tendency for people and businesses to hoard cash and avoid investment during a recession. He argued that this invalidated the assumptions of classical economists who thought that markets always clear, leaving no surplus of goods and no willing labor left idle.

Neil Wallace is an American economist and professor of economics at Penn State University. He is considered one of the main proponents of new classical macroeconomics in the field of economics.

References

  1. "The Economists for Brexit predictions are inconsistent with the basic facts of international trade". 23 August 2017.
  2. "Where Britain went wrong". POLITICO. 3 November 2022. Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  3. 'Minford, Prof. (Anthony) Patrick (Leslie)', Who's Who 2017, A & C Black, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing plc, 2017
  4. "Patrick Minford – Curriculum Vitae". Archived from the original on 26 November 2009. Retrieved 14 July 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  5. P. Minford and K. Matthews "A Rational Expectations Model of the UK under Floating Exchange Rates", European Economic Review, 1980, pp. 189–219
  6. P. Minford, "A Rational Expectations Model of the UK Under Fixed and Floating Exchange Rates", in The State of Macroeconomics, (eds. K. Brunner and A. Meltzer), Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy, 1980, Vol. 12. (Now part of Journal of Monetary Economics).
  7. See also P. Minford and K. Matthews, 1978, "A Note on Terminal Conditions and the Analytic Solution of RE Models", Department of Economics, University of Liverpool.
  8. "A Note on Terminal Conditions and the Analytic Solutions of RE Models".
  9. R. Fair, "An analysis of a macroeconometric model with rational expectations in the bond and stock markets", American Economic Review, 69(4), 1979, 539–552.; Paul A. Anderson, "Rational expectations forecasts from nonrational models", Journal of Monetary Economics, 5, 1979, 67–80.
  10. R. Fair and J. Taylor, "Solution and Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models" Econometrica, 1983, 51, (4), 1169–85
  11. P. Minford "The Nature and Purpose of UK Macroeconomic Models", Three Banks Review, March 1980, pp. 3–26
  12. P. Minford "The Exchange Rate and Monetary Policy", Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 33, July 1981 Supplement, pp. 120–42, reprinted in The Money Supply and the Exchange Rate, (eds. W. Eltis and P. Sinclair), Oxford University Press, 1981, pp. 120–42
  13. P. Minford, Vo Phuong Mai Le, David Meenagh, and Michael Wickens "How much nominal rigidity is there in the US economy? Testing a New Keynesian DSGE Model using indirect inference", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35(12), 2078–2104, December 2011; special issue Frontiers in Structural Macroeconomic Modelling.
  14. P.Minford, Mai Le, David Meenagh, Mike Wickens and Yongdeng Xu Testing macro models by indirect inference: a survey for users, forthcoming Open Economies Review; accompanied by a suite of programmes on www.patrickminford.net/Indirect , enabling applied economists to use these methods.
  15. Vo Phuong Mai Le, David Meenagh and A. Patrick Minford, "Monetarism rides again? US monetary policy in a world of Quantitative Easing", No E2014/22, Cardiff Economics Working Papers from Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section
  16. P. Minford. Evidence given to Treasury and Civil Service Committee, Memorandum, in Memoranda on Monetary Policy, HMSO 1980, Oral Evidence given in July 1980 in Committee's Third Report, Vol. II (Minutes of Evidence, HMSO, pp. 8–40)
  17. P. Minford 'Monetarism, Inflation and Economic Policy', in Is Monetarism Enough ? (ed. A. Seldon), Institute of Economic Affairs, 1980, pp. 1–31.
  18. P. Minford 'Labour Market Equilibrium in an Open Economy', Oxford Economic Papers, November 1983 Supplement on Unemployment, Vol. 35(4), reprinted in The Causes of Unemployment, (eds. C. A. Greenhalgh, P. R. G. Layard and A. J. Oswald), Oxford University Press, 1983, pp. 207–44.
  19. P. Minford with D.H. Davies, M.J. Peel and A. Sprague Unemployment: Cause and Cure. Martin Robertson, Oxford, 1983. 2nd Edition (with above and P. Ashton), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1985
  20. Dawar, Anil (10 November 2015). "Why we must quit the EU: Cost of living would FALL by 8%". Express.co.uk. Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  21. "Where Britain went wrong". POLITICO. 3 November 2022. Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  22. P. Minford, David Meenagh and Bruce Webb ‘Britain and EMU: Assessing the costs in macroeconomic variability’, The World Economy 27(3), 2004, 301–358; also available on the Blackwell Synergy online delivery service, accessible via the journal's website at [https://web.archive.org/web/19990125093717/http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/ Blackwell-Synergy]
  23. P. Minford ‘Should we join the Euro? The Chancellor’s 5 tests examined’ IEA Occasional Paper 126, 2002.
  24. P. Minford 'The EMS – what is wrong with it ?', in The International Monetary System and Economic Development, (eds. C. Drager and L. Spath), Drager Foundation, 1988.
  25. P. Minford with Vidya Mahambare and Eric Nowell, Should Britain leave the EU? An economic analysis of a troubled relationship, Edward Elgar in association with the Institute of Economic Affairs, 2005, p. 254; second edition, same title, December 2015, P. Minford with Sakshi Gupta, Vo P. M. Le, Vidya Mahambare and Yongdeng Xu.
  26. "'Economists for Brexit' back campaign to leave EU". BBC News. 28 April 2016. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
  27. "Most economists say Brexit will hurt the economy—but one disagrees". The Economist. 24 August 2017.
  28. "The only economic study showing Brexit will benefit UK has been debunked as 'doubly misleading'". The Independent. 22 April 2017.
  29. "Boris Johnson says May's Brexit plan 'worse than status quo'". BBC News. 11 September 2018. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
  30. P. Minford 'How Fair is the Community Charge or Poll Tax ?', Economic Affairs, Vol. 10 No. 5, June/July 1990, pp. 45–46, IEA.
  31. Reform, Advisory Council Archived 26 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved 15 May 2011
  32. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/251473/17_10_13___FINAL_GUEST_LIST_FOR_PUBLICATION.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  33. "No. 54255". The London Gazette (Supplement). 29 December 1995. p. 9.