Peak ground acceleration

Last updated

Peak ground acceleration (PGA) is equal to the maximum ground acceleration that occurred during earthquake shaking at a location. PGA is equal to the amplitude of the largest absolute acceleration recorded on an accelerogram at a site during a particular earthquake. [1] Earthquake shaking generally occurs in all three directions. Therefore, PGA is often split into the horizontal and vertical components. Horizontal PGAs are generally larger than those in the vertical direction but this is not always true, especially close to large earthquakes. PGA is an important parameter (also known as an intensity measure) for earthquake engineering, The design basis earthquake ground motion (DBEGM) [2] is often defined in terms of PGA.

Contents

Unlike the Richter and moment magnitude scales, it is not a measure of the total energy (magnitude, or size) of an earthquake, but rather of how much the earth shakes at a given geographic point. The Mercalli intensity scale uses personal reports and observations to measure earthquake intensity but PGA is measured by instruments, such as accelerographs. It can be correlated to macroseismic intensities on the Mercalli scale [3] but these correlations are associated with large uncertainty. [4] [5]

The peak horizontal acceleration (PHA) is the most commonly used type of ground acceleration in engineering applications. It is often used within earthquake engineering (including seismic building codes) and it is commonly plotted on seismic hazard maps. [6] In an earthquake, damage to buildings and infrastructure is related more closely to ground motion, of which PGA is a measure, rather than the magnitude of the earthquake itself. For moderate earthquakes, PGA is a reasonably good determinant of damage; in severe earthquakes, damage is more often correlated with peak ground velocity. [3]

Geophysics

Earthquake energy is dispersed in waves from the hypocentre, causing ground movement omnidirectionally but typically modelled horizontally (in two directions) and vertically. PGA records the acceleration (rate of change of speed) of these movements, while peak ground velocity is the greatest speed (rate of movement) reached by the ground, and peak displacement is the distance moved. [7] [8] These values vary in different earthquakes, and in differing sites within one earthquake event, depending on a number of factors. These include the length of the fault, magnitude, the depth of the quake, the distance from the epicentre, the duration (length of the shake cycle), and the geology of the ground (subsurface). Shallow-focused earthquakes generate stronger shaking (acceleration) than intermediate and deep quakes, since the energy is released closer to the surface. [9]

Peak ground acceleration can be expressed in fractions of g (the standard acceleration due to Earth's gravity, equivalent to g-force) as either a decimal or percentage; in m/s2 (1 g = 9.81 m/s2); [7] or in multiples of Gal, where 1 Gal is equal to 0.01 m/s2 (1 g = 981 Gal).

The ground type can significantly influence ground acceleration, so PGA values can display extreme variability over distances of a few kilometers, particularly with moderate to large earthquakes. [10] The varying PGA results from an earthquake can be displayed on a shake map. [11] Due to the complex conditions affecting PGA, earthquakes of similar magnitude can offer disparate results, with many moderate magnitude earthquakes generating significantly larger PGA values than larger magnitude quakes.

During an earthquake, ground acceleration is measured in three directions: vertically (V or UD, for up-down) and two perpendicular horizontal directions (H1 and H2), often north–south (NS) and east–west (EW). The peak acceleration in each of these directions is recorded, with the highest individual value often reported. Alternatively, a combined value for a given station can be noted. The peak horizontal ground acceleration (PHA or PHGA) can be reached by selecting the higher individual recording, taking the mean of the two values, or calculating a vector sum of the two components. A three-component value can also be reached, by taking the vertical component into consideration also.

In seismic engineering, the effective peak acceleration (EPA, the maximum ground acceleration to which a building responds) is often used, which tends to be ⅔ –[ citation needed ].

Seismic risk and engineering

Study of geographic areas combined with an assessment of historical earthquakes allows geologists to determine seismic risk and to create seismic hazard maps, which show the likely PGA values to be experienced in a region during an earthquake, with a probability of exceedance (PE). Seismic engineers and government planning departments use these values to determine the appropriate earthquake loading for buildings in each zone, with key identified structures (such as hospitals, bridges, power plants) needing to survive the maximum considered earthquake (MCE).

Damage to buildings is related to both peak ground velocity (PGV) and the duration of the earthquake – the longer high-level shaking persists, the greater the likelihood of damage.

Comparison of instrumental and felt intensity

Peak ground acceleration provides a measurement of instrumental intensity, that is, ground shaking recorded by seismic instruments. Other intensity scales measure felt intensity, based on eyewitness reports, felt shaking, and observed damage. There is correlation between these scales, but not always absolute agreement since experiences and damage can be affected by many other factors, including the quality of earthquake engineering.

Generally speaking,

Correlation with the Mercalli scale

The United States Geological Survey developed an Instrumental Intensity scale, which maps peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity on an intensity scale similar to the felt Mercalli scale. These values are used to create shake maps by seismologists around the world. [3]

Instrumental
Intensity
Acceleration
(g)
Velocity
(cm/s)
Perceived shakingPotential damage
I< 0.000464< 0.0215Not feltNone
II–III0.000464 – 0.002970.135 – 1.41WeakNone
IV0.00297 – 0.02761.41 – 4.65LightNone
V0.0276 – 0.1154.65 – 9.64ModerateVery light
VI0.115 – 0.2159.64 – 20StrongLight
VII0.215 – 0.40120 – 41.4Very strongModerate
VIII0.401 – 0.74741.4 – 85.8SevereModerate to heavy
IX0.747 – 1.3985.8 – 178ViolentHeavy
X+> 1.39> 178ExtremeVery heavy

Other intensity scales

In the 7-class Japan Meteorological Agency seismic intensity scale, the highest intensity, Shindo 7, covers accelerations greater than 4 m/s2 (0.41 g).

PGA hazard risks worldwide

In India, areas with expected PGA values higher than 0.36 g are classed as "Zone 5", or "Very High Damage Risk Zone".

Notable earthquakes

PGA
single direction
(max recorded)
PGA
vector sum (H1, H2, V)
(max recorded)
Magnitude Mw DepthFatalitiesEarthquake
3.23 g [12] 7.815 km2 2016 Kaikōura earthquake
2.93 g [13] 3.54 g9.533 km1,000–6000 1960 Valdivia earthquake
2.7 g [14] 2.99 g [15] [16] 9.1 [17] 30 km [18] 19,759 [19] 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami
4.36 g [20] 6.98 km12 2008 Iwate–Miyagi Nairiku earthquake
2.88 g [21] 7.510 km78 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake
1.92 g [22] 7.78 km2,415 1999 Jiji earthquake
1.82 g [23] 6.718 km [24] 57 1994 Northridge earthquake
1.62 g [25] 7.810 km57,658 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake
1.51 g [26] [27] 6.2 [28] 5 km185 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake
1.26 g [29] [30] 7.110 km0 2010 Canterbury earthquake
1.25 g [31] 6.68.4 km58–65 1971 Sylmar earthquake
1.04 g [32] 6.610 km11 2007 Chūetsu offshore earthquake
0.98 g [33] 7.016.1 km118 2020 Aegean Sea earthquake
0.91 g6.917.6 km5,502–6,434 1995 Great Hanshin earthquake
0.8 g [34] 7.212 km222 2013 Bohol earthquake
0.65 [35] 6.919 km63 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake
0.5 g [36] 7.013 km100,000–316,000 2010 Haiti earthquake
0.34 g [37] 6.415 km5,778 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake
0.18 g [38] 9.225 km131 1964 Alaska earthquake

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earthquake</span> Sudden movement of the Earths crust

An earthquake – also called a quake, tremor, or temblor – is the shaking of the surface of Earth resulting from a sudden release of energy in the lithosphere that creates seismic waves. Earthquakes can range in intensity, from those that are so weak that they cannot be felt, to those violent enough to propel objects and people into the air, damage critical infrastructure, and wreak destruction across entire cities. The seismic activity of an area is the frequency, type, and size of earthquakes experienced over a particular time. The seismicity at a particular location in the Earth is the average rate of seismic energy release per unit volume. The word tremor is also used for non-earthquake seismic rumbling.

The Modified Mercalli intensity scale measures the effects of an earthquake at a given location. This is in contrast with the seismic magnitude usually reported for an earthquake.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seismic hazard</span> Probability that an earthquake will occur in a given geographic area, within a given window of time

A seismic hazard is the probability that an earthquake will occur in a given geographic area, within a given window of time, and with ground motion intensity exceeding a given threshold. With a hazard thus estimated, risk can be assessed and included in such areas as building codes for standard buildings, designing larger buildings and infrastructure projects, land use planning and determining insurance rates. The seismic hazard studies also may generate two standard measures of anticipated ground motion, both confusingly abbreviated MCE; the simpler probabilistic Maximum Considered Earthquake, used in standard building codes, and the more detailed and deterministic Maximum Credible Earthquake incorporated in the design of larger buildings and civil infrastructure like dams or bridges. It is important to clarify which MCE is being discussed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Japan Meteorological Agency seismic intensity scale</span> Japanese earthquake measurements

The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) Seismic Intensity Scale is a seismic intensity scale used in Japan to categorize the intensity of local ground shaking caused by earthquakes.

Induced seismicity is typically earthquakes and tremors that are caused by human activity that alters the stresses and strains on Earth's crust. Most induced seismicity is of a low magnitude. A few sites regularly have larger quakes, such as The Geysers geothermal plant in California which averaged two M4 events and 15 M3 events every year from 2004 to 2009. The Human-Induced Earthquake Database (HiQuake) documents all reported cases of induced seismicity proposed on scientific grounds and is the most complete compilation of its kind.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strong ground motion</span> Type of earthquake

In seismology, strong ground motion is the strong earthquake shaking that occurs close to a causative fault. The strength of the shaking involved in strong ground motion usually overwhelms a seismometer, forcing the use of accelerographs for recording. The science of strong ground motion also deals with the variations of fault rupture, both in total displacement, energy released, and rupture velocity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1987 Whittier Narrows earthquake</span> Earthquake in southern California

The 1987 Whittier Narrows earthquake occurred in the southern San Gabriel Valley and surrounding communities of Southern California, United States, at 7:42 a.m. PDT on October 1. The moderate magnitude 5.9 blind thrust earthquake was centered several miles north of Whittier in the town of Rosemead, had a relatively shallow depth, and was felt throughout southern California and southern Nevada. Many homes and businesses were affected, along with roadway disruptions, mainly in Los Angeles and Orange counties. Damage estimates ranged from $213–358 million, with 200 injuries, three directly-related deaths, and five additional fatalities that were associated with the event.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earthquake zones of India</span>

The Indian subcontinent has a history of devastating earthquakes. The major reason for the high frequency and intensity of the earthquakes is that the Indian plate is driving into Asia at a rate of approximately 47 mm/year. Geographical statistics of India show that almost 58% of the land is vulnerable to earthquakes. A World Bank and United Nations report shows estimates that around 200 million city dwellers in India will be exposed to storms and earthquakes by 2050. The latest version of seismic zoning map of India given in the earthquake resistant design code of India [IS 1893 2002] assigns four levels of seismicity for India in terms of zone factors. In other words, the earthquake zoning map of India divides India into 4 seismic zones unlike its previous version, which consisted of five or six zones for the country. According to the present zoning map, Zone 5 expects the highest level of seismicity whereas Zone 2 is associated with the lowest level of seismicity.

Seismic magnitude scales are used to describe the overall strength or "size" of an earthquake. These are distinguished from seismic intensity scales that categorize the intensity or severity of ground shaking (quaking) caused by an earthquake at a given location. Magnitudes are usually determined from measurements of an earthquake's seismic waves as recorded on a seismogram. Magnitude scales vary on what aspect of the seismic waves are measured and how they are measured. Different magnitude scales are necessary because of differences in earthquakes, the information available, and the purposes for which the magnitudes are used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2007 Noto earthquake</span> Earthquake in Japan

The 2007 Noto Peninsula earthquake occurred on March 25, 2007, in the Hokuriku region of Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1999 Athens earthquake</span> 6.0 Mw earthquake

The 1999 Athens earthquake occurred on September 7 at 14:56:51 local time near Mount Parnitha in Greece with a moment magnitude of 6.0 and a maximum Mercalli intensity of IX (Violent). The proximity to the Athens metropolitan area resulted in widespread structural damage, mainly to the nearby suburban towns of Ano Liosia, Acharnes, Fyli, Thrakomakedones, Kifissia, Metamorfosi, Kamatero and Nea Filadelfeia. More than 100 buildings across those areas collapsed trapping scores of victims under their rubble while dozens more were severely damaged. With damage estimated at $3–4.2 billion, 143 people were killed, and up to 1,600 were treated for injuries in Greece's deadliest natural disaster in almost half a century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epicentral distance</span>

Epicentral distance refers to the ground distance from the epicenter to a specified point. Generally, the smaller the epicentral distance of an earthquake of the same scale, the heavier the damage caused by the earthquake. On the contrary, with the increase of epicentral distance, the damage caused by the earthquake is gradually reduced. Due to the limitation of seismometers designed in the early years, some seismic magnitude scales began to show errors when the epicentral distance exceeded a certain range from the observation points. In seismology, the unit of far earthquakes is usually ° (degree), while the unit of near earthquakes is km. But regardless of distance, Δ is used as a symbol for the epicentral distance.

The 1965 Puget Sound earthquake occurred at 08:28 AM PDT on April 29 within the Puget Sound region of Washington state. It had a magnitude of 6.7 on the moment magnitude scale and a maximum perceived intensity of VIII (Severe) on the Mercalli intensity scale. It caused the deaths of seven people and about $12.5–28 million in damage. There were no recorded aftershocks.

The Arias intensity (IA) is a measure of the strength of a ground motion. It determines the intensity of shaking by measuring the acceleration of transient seismic waves. It has been found to be a fairly reliable parameter to describe earthquake shaking necessary to trigger landslides. It was proposed by Chilean engineer Arturo Arias in 1970.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spectral acceleration</span>

Spectral acceleration (SA) is a unit measured in g that describes the maximum acceleration in an earthquake on an object – specifically a damped, harmonic oscillator moving in one physical dimension. This can be measured at different oscillation frequencies and with different degrees of damping, although 5% damping is commonly applied. The SA at different frequencies may be plotted to form a response spectrum.

Seismic site effects are related to the amplification of seismic waves in superficial geological layers. The surface ground motion may be strongly amplified if the geological conditions are unfavorable. Therefore, the study of local site effects is an important part of the assessment of strong ground motions, seismic hazard and engineering seismology in general. Damage due to an earthquake may thus be aggravated as in the case of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake. For alluvial basins, we may shake a bowl of jelly to model the phenomenon at a small scale.

The 2010 Damghan earthquake occurred in northern Iran at 11:53:49 local time on August 27 with a moment magnitude of 5.8 and maximum Mercalli intensity of VII. This strike-slip event damaged and destroyed a number of small villages in a sparsely populated region near the Alborz mountain range. It left four people dead, 40 injured, and about 800 without homes. The deaths and injuries in this moderate event were attributed to the low-quality construction styles that are typical of the area. The Iranian Strong Motion Network provided data by which seismologists determined the type and extent of the slip as well as the peak ground acceleration. Other large and destructive earthquakes have affected Semnan Province, including several events in 856 AD and 1953.

Seismic intensity scales categorize the intensity or severity of ground shaking (quaking) at a given location, such as resulting from an earthquake. They are distinguished from seismic magnitude scales, which measure the magnitude or overall strength of an earthquake, which may, or perhaps may not, cause perceptible shaking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">July 2008 Iwate earthquake</span> Earthquake in Japan

The July 2008 Iwate earthquake was an earthquake that occurred in Iwate Prefecture, Japan on July 23, 2008. The earthquake's moment magnitude was 6.8 and it occurred at a depth of 115 km. Since this earthquake was an intermediate-focus earthquake, the shaking of the earthquake was observed over a wide range. It had a maximum JMA intensity of Shindo 6− . 

References

  1. Douglas, J (2003-04-01). "Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates" (PDF). Earth-Science Reviews. 61 (1–2): 43–104. Bibcode:2003ESRv...61...43D. doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00112-5.
  2. Nuclear Power Plants and Earthquakes Archived 2009-07-22 at the Wayback Machine , accessed 8 April 2011.
  3. 1 2 3 "ShakeMap Scientific Background. Rapid Instrumental Intensity Maps". Earthquake Hazards Program. U. S. Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 23 June 2011. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  4. Cua, G.; et al. (2010). "Best Practices" for Using Macroseismic Intensity and Ground Motion Intensity Conversion Equations for Hazard and Loss Models in GEM1 (PDF). Global Earthquake Model. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 December 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  5. See also: Seismic magnitude scales
  6. European Facilities for Earthquake Hazard & Risk (2013). "The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM13)". EFEHR. Archived from the original on 27 December 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  7. 1 2 "Explanation of Parameters". Geologic Hazards Science Center. U.S. Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  8. 1 2 Lorant, Gabor (17 June 2010). "Seismic Design Principles". Whole Building Design Guide. National Institute of Building Sciences. Retrieved 15 March 2011.
  9. "Magnitude 6.6 – Near the west coast of Honshu, Japan". Earthquake summary. USGS. 16 July 2001. Archived from the original on 14 March 2011. Retrieved 15 March 2011.
  10. "ShakeMap scientific background. Peak acceleration maps". Earthquake Hazards Program. U. S. Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 23 June 2011. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  11. "ShakeMap Scientific Background". Earthquake Hazards Program. U. S. Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 23 June 2011. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  12. Goto, Hiroyuki; Kaneko, Yoshihiro; Young, John; Avery, Hamish; Damiano, Len (4 February 2019). "Extreme Accelerations During Earthquakes Caused by Elastic Flapping Effect". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 1117. Bibcode:2019NatSR...9.1117G. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37716-y. PMC   6361895 . PMID   30718810.
  13. "M 9.5 - 1960 Great Chilean Earthquake (Valdivia Earthquake)". USGS . Retrieved 21 September 2023.
  14. Erol Kalkan; Volkan Sevilgen (17 March 2011). "March 11, 2011 M9.0 Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Preliminary results". United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 24 March 2011. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  15. "平成23年(2011年)東北地方太平洋沖地震による強震動" [About strong ground motion caused by the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake]. Kyoshin Bosai. Retrieved 10 November 2021.
  16. "2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku earthquake, Strong Ground Motion" (PDF). National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 March 2011. Retrieved 18 March 2011.
  17. "M 9.1 - 2011 Great Tohoku Earthquake, Japan - Origin". USGS . Retrieved 10 November 2021.
  18. "Archived copy of USGS Magnitude 7 and Greater Earthquakes in 2011". Archived from the original on 13 April 2016. Retrieved 8 September 2017.
  19. "平成23年(2011年)東北地方太平洋沖地震(東日本大震災)について(第162報)(令和4年3月8日)" [Press release no. 162 of the 2011 Tohuku earthquake](PDF). 総務省消防庁災害対策本部[ Fire and Disaster Management Agency ]. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-08-27. Retrieved 2022-09-23. Page 31 of the PDF file.
  20. Masumi Yamada; et al. (July–August 2010). "Spatially Dense Velocity Structure Exploration in the Source Region of the Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake". Seismological Research Letters v. 81; no. 4. Seismological Society of America. pp. 597–604. Retrieved 21 March 2011.
  21. "【速報】揺れの最大加速度、東日本大震災に匹敵". 47news. 2 January 2024. Retrieved 4 January 2024.
  22. "M 7.7 - 21 km S of Puli, Taiwan". USGS . Retrieved 10 November 2021.
  23. Yegian, M.K.; Ghahraman; Gazetas, G.; Dakoulas, P.; Makris, N. (April 1995). "The Northridge Earthquake of 1994: Ground Motions and Geotechnical Aspects" (PDF). Third International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Northeastern University College of Engineering. p. 1384. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 May 2013. Retrieved 7 April 2021.
  24. "M 6.7 - 1km NNW of Reseda, CA". USGS . Retrieved 10 November 2021.
  25. "M 7.8 - Pazarcik earthquake, Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence". Archived from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2023-04-07.
  26. "Feb 22 2011 – Christchurch badly damaged by magnitude 6.3 earthquake". Geonet. GNS Science. 23 February 2011. Archived from the original on 4 March 2011. Retrieved 24 February 2011.
  27. "PGA intensity map". Geonet. GNS Science. Archived from the original on 31 May 2012. Retrieved 24 February 2011.
  28. "New Zealand Earthquake Report – Feb 22 2011 at 12:51 pm (NZDT)". Geonet. GNS Science. 22 February 2011. Archived from the original on 25 February 2011. Retrieved 24 February 2011.
  29. Carter, Hamish (24 February 2011). "Technically it's just an aftershock". New Zealand Herald. APN Holdings. Retrieved 24 February 2011.
  30. "M 7.1, Darfield (Canterbury), September 4, 2010". GeoNet. GNS Science. Archived from the original on 2 March 2011. Retrieved 7 March 2011.
  31. Cloud & Hudson 1975 , pp. 278, 287
  32. Katsuhiko, Ishibashi (11 August 2001). "Why Worry? Japan's Nuclear Plants at Grave Risk From Quake Damage". Japan Focus. Asia Pacific Journal. Retrieved 15 March 2011.
  33. Mauricio Morales; Oguz C. Celik. "EERI PERW 2021 – Part 1: Aegean Sea Earthquake". slc.eeri.org. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. Archived from the original on 27 June 2022. Retrieved 12 October 2021.
  34. "The Mw7.2 15 October 2013 Bohol, Philippines Earthquake" (PDF). Emi-megacities.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 October 2022. Retrieved 17 December 2022.
  35. Clough, G. W.; Martin, J. R.; Chameau, J. L. II (1994). "The geotechnical aspects". Practical lessons from the Loma Prieta earthquake. National Academies Press. pp. 29–46. ISBN   978-0309050302.
  36. Lin, Rong-Gong; Allen, Sam (26 February 2011). "New Zealand quake raises questions about L.A. buildings". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 27 February 2011.
  37. Elnashai et al. 2006 , p. 18
  38. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on the Alaska Earthquake, The great Alaska earthquake of 1964, Volume 1, Part 1, National Academies, 1968 p. 285

Bibliography