Public humiliation

Last updated
South Korean gang leader Lee Jung-jae being shame-paraded by Park Chung Hee's military regime (1961). joridolrim.JPG
South Korean gang leader Lee Jung-jae being shame-paraded by Park Chung Hee's military regime (1961).

Public humiliation or public shaming is a form of punishment whose main feature is dishonoring or disgracing a person, usually an offender or a prisoner, especially in a public place. It was regularly used as a form of judicially sanctioned punishment in previous centuries, and is still practiced by different means in the modern era.

Contents

In the United States, it was a common punishment from the beginning of European colonization through the 19th century. It fell out of common use in the 20th century, though it has seen a revival starting in the 1990s. [1] With the rise of the social media, public shaming moved to the digital sphere, exposing and humiliating people daily, sometimes without their knowledge [2]

Shameful exposure

Pillories were a common form of punishment. Pillory 9105377.jpg
Pillories were a common form of punishment.

Public humiliation exists in many forms. In general, a criminal sentenced to one of many forms of this punishment could expect themselves be placed (restrained) in a central, public, or open location so that their fellow citizens could easily witness the sentence and, in some cases, participate as a form of "mob justice". [3]

Just like painful forms of corporal punishment, it has parallels in educational and other rather private punishments (but with some audience), in school or domestic disciplinary context, and as a rite of passage. Physical forms include being forced to wear some sign such as "donkey ears" (simulated in paper, as a sign one is—or at least behaved—proverbially stupid), wearing a dunce cap, having to stand, kneel or bend over in a corner, or repeatedly write something on a blackboard ("I will not spread rumors", for example). Here different levels of physical discomfort can be added, such as having to hold heavy objects, or kneeling on an uneven surface. Like physical punishment and harsh hazing, these have become controversial in most modern societies, in many cases leading to legal restrictions and/or (sometimes voluntary) abolishment.[ citation needed ]

Paris, 1944: French women accused of collaboration with Nazis had their heads shaved and were paraded through the streets barefoot. Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1971-041-10, Paris, der Kollaboration beschuldigte Franzosinnen.jpg
Paris, 1944: French women accused of collaboration with Nazis had their heads shaved and were paraded through the streets barefoot.

Head shaving can be a humiliating punishment prescribed in law, [4] but also something done as "mob justice"—a stark example of which was the thousands of European women who had their heads shaved in front of cheering crowds in the wake of World War II, [5] [6] as punishment for associating with occupying Nazis during the war. Public shaving was applied to (true or alleged) collaborators after the Allied liberated occupied territories from the Nazi troops. [5] [6]

Further means of public humiliation and degradation consist in forcing people to wear typifying clothes, which can be penitential garb or prison uniforms. [7] [8] Forcing arrestees or prisoners to wear restraints (such as handcuffs or shackles) may also increase public humiliation. In countries such as Japan, France, and South Korea, [9] handcuffs on arrested persons are blurred in media broadcasts and hidden wherever possible to prevent feelings of "personal shame" in the accused and to make the public more likely to maintain a presumption of innocence before trial. [10]

Forcing people to go barefoot has been used as a more subtle form of humiliation in past and present cultures. The exposure of bare feet has served as an indicator for imprisonment and slavery throughout ancient and modern history. [11] Even today prisoners officially have to go barefoot in many countries of the world and are also presented in court and in public unshod. [12] [13]

Corporal punishment

Public foot whipping in Iran Antoin Sevruguin 12 Falak Whipping the soles of a criminal.jpg
Public foot whipping in Iran
Public flogging in Brazil, Jean-Baptiste Debret L'Execution de la Punition de Fouet by Jean-Baptiste Debret.jpg
Public flogging in Brazil, Jean-Baptiste Debret

Apart from specific methods essentially aiming at humiliation, several methods combine pain and humiliation or even death and humiliation. In some cases, the pain—or at least discomfort—is insignificant or rather secondary to the humiliation. [14] [15] [16]

Public punishment

The simplest is to administer painful corporal punishment in public - the major aim may be deterrence of potential offenders - so the public will witness the perpetrator's fear and agony. This can either take place in a town square or other public gathering location such as a school, or take the form of a procession through the streets. This was not uncommon in the sentences to Staupenschlag (flagellation by whipping or birching, generally on the bare buttocks) [17] in various European states, till the 19th century. [18] A naval equivalent was Flogging round the fleet on a raft taken from ship to ship for consecutive installments of a great total of lashes. [19] [20] In some countries, the punishment of foot whipping is executed in public to this day. [21]

Torture marks

The 1774 tarring and feathering of British customs agent John Malcolm soon after the Boston Tea Party. Philip Dawe (attributed), The Bostonians Paying the Excise-man, or Tarring and Feathering (1774) - 02.jpg
The 1774 tarring and feathering of British customs agent John Malcolm soon after the Boston Tea Party.

The humiliation can be extended; intentionally or not; by leaving visible marks, such as scars. This can even be the main intention of the punishment, as in the case of scarifications, such as human branding. [22] Other examples of physical torture or modification used as public humiliation throughout history include ear cropping (starting in ancient Assyrian law and the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi and extending into the 1800s in parts of the US) [23] and tarring and feathering. [24]

Psychological effects

Public shaming can result in negative psychological effects and devastating consequences, regardless of the punishment being justifiable or not. It could cause depression, suicidal thoughts and other severe mental problems. The humiliated individuals may develop a variety of symptoms including apathy, paranoia, anxiety, PTSD, or others. The rage and fury may arise in the persecuted individual, themselves lashing out against innocent victims, as they seek revenge or as a means of release.[ citation needed ]

Historical examples

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporal punishment</span> Punishment intended to cause physical pain

A corporal punishment or a physical punishment is a punishment which is intended to cause physical pain to a person. When it is inflicted on minors, especially in home and school settings, its methods may include spanking or paddling. When it is inflicted on adults, it may be inflicted on prisoners and slaves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flagellation</span> Whipping as a punishment

Flagellation, flogging or whipping is the act of beating the human body with special implements such as whips, rods, switches, the cat o' nine tails, the sjambok, the knout, etc. Typically, flogging has been imposed on an unwilling subject as a punishment; however, it can also be submitted to willingly and even done by oneself in sadomasochistic or religious contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Humiliation</span> Abasement of pride

Humiliation is the abasement of pride, which creates mortification or leads to a state of being humbled or reduced to lowliness or submission. It is an emotion felt by a person whose social status, either by force or willingly, has just decreased. It can be brought about through intimidation, physical or mental mistreatment or trickery, or by embarrassment if a person is revealed to have committed a socially or legally unacceptable act. Whereas humility can be sought alone as a means to de-emphasize the ego, humiliation must involve other person(s), though not necessarily directly or willingly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pillory</span> Restraint used to hold and punish a person in a standing position

The pillory is a device made of a wooden or metal framework erected on a post, with holes for securing the head and hands, used during the medieval and renaissance periods for punishment by public humiliation and often further physical abuse. The pillory is related to the stocks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stocks</span> Restraining device

Stocks are feet restraining devices that were used as a form of corporal punishment and public humiliation. The use of stocks is seen as early as Ancient Greece, where they are described as being in use in Solon's law code. The law describing its use is cited by the orator Lysias: "'He shall have his or her foot confined in the stocks for five days, if the court shall make such addition to the sentence.' The 'stocks' there mentioned, Theomnestus, are what we now call 'confinement in the wood'".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cat o' nine tails</span> Type of whip

The cat o' nine tails, commonly shortened to the cat, is a type of multi-tailed whip or flail. It originated as an implement for physical punishment, notably in the Royal Navy and British Army, and as a judicial punishment in Britain and some other countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ducking stool</span> Punishment chairs

Ducking stools or cucking stools were chairs formerly used for punishment of disorderly women, scolds, and dishonest tradesmen in medieval Europe and elsewhere at later times. The cucking-stool was a form of wymen pine, or "women's punishment", as referred to in Langland's Piers Plowman (1378). They were instruments of public humiliation and censure both primarily for the offense of scolding or backbiting and less often for sexual offences like bearing an illegitimate child or prostitution.

Tickle torture is the prolonged use of tickling to abuse, dominate, harass, humiliate, or interrogate an individual. While laughter is popularly thought of as a pleasure response, in tickle torture, the one being tickled may laugh whether or not they find the experience pleasant. In a tickling situation, laughter can indicate a panic reflex rather than a pleasure response, and the tickling may be a consensual activity or one that is forced, depending on the circumstances. In a consensual form, tickling may be part of a mutually fulfilling, physically intimate act between partners. However, tickle torture can cause real physical and mental distress in a victim, which is why it has been used as an interrogation method or to simply show dominance over another person. Usually tickling is done on feet and armpits after tying the person's ankles and wrists. The recipient is also often stripped to their underwear.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human branding</span> Process by which a mark is permanently burned into the skin of a living person

Human branding or stigmatizing is the process by which a mark, usually a symbol or ornamental pattern, is burned into the skin of a living person, with the intention that the resulting scar makes it permanent. This is performed using a hot or very cold branding iron. It therefore uses the physical techniques of livestock branding on a human, either with consent as a form of body modification; or under coercion, as a punishment or to identify an enslaved, oppressed, or otherwise controlled person. It may also be practiced as a "rite of passage", e.g. within a tribe, or to signify membership of or acceptance into an organization.

Psychological punishments are punishments that aim to cause mental pain or discomfort in order to punish an individual. Psychological punishments are usually designed to cause discomfort or pain through creating negative emotions such as humiliation, shame and fear within an individual or by depriving the individual of sensory and/or social stimulation.

During the Edo period, Japan (1603-1868) used various punishments against criminals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caning in Singapore</span> Corporal punishment

Caning is a widely used form of corporal punishment in Singapore. It can be divided into several contexts: judicial, prison, reformatory, military, school and domestic. These practices of caning as punishment were introduced during the period of British colonial rule in Singapore. Similar forms of corporal punishment are also used in some other former British colonies, including two of Singapore's neighbouring countries, Malaysia and Brunei.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stress position</span> Position that puts the human body in a great amount of pain

A stress position, also known as a submission position, places the human body in such a way that a great amount of weight is placed on very few muscles. For example, a subject may be forced to stand on the balls of their feet, then squat so that their thighs are parallel to the ground. This creates an intense amount of pressure on the legs, leading first to pain and then muscle failure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bilboes</span> Form of leg restraint

Bilboes are iron restraints normally placed on a person's ankles. They have commonly been used as leg shackles to restrain prisoners for different purposes until the modern ages. Bilboes were also used on slave ships, such as the Henrietta Marie. According to legend, the device was invented in Bilbao and was imported into England by the ships of the Spanish Armada for use on prospective English prisoners. However, the Oxford English Dictionary notes that the term was used in English well before then.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporal punishment in Taiwan</span>

Corporal punishment is banned in the penal and education systems of the Republic of China (Taiwan), but there are no laws banning its use in the home. However, as of 22 March 2023, there is a draft amendment of Article 1085 of the Civil Law that may make some forms of corporal punishment in the home illegal if it comes into effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Breast torture</span> BDSM sexual activity

Breast torture is a BDSM activity in which sexual stimulation is provided through the intentional application of physical pain or constriction to the breasts, areolae or nipples of a submissive. It is a popular activity among the kink community. The recipient of such activities may wish to receive them as a result of masochism or they may have a desire to please a dominant who is sadistic. Those involved may also be motivated by breast fetishism. Mild breast torture such as light impact play on the breasts is also occasionally used outside of the BDSM context to provide stimulation and pleasure during conventional sex. While breast and nipple torture is usually performed on women, most techniques or methods may also be used on men.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caning in Malaysia</span> Corporal punishment

Caning is used as a form of corporal punishment in Malaysia. It can be divided into at least four contexts: judicial/prison, school, domestic, and sharia/syariah. Of these, the first is largely a legacy of British colonial rule in the territories that are now part of Malaysia, particularly Malaya.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial corporal punishment</span> Punitive practice

Judicial corporal punishment is the infliction of corporal punishment as a result of a sentence imposed on an offender by a court of law, including flagellation, forced amputations, caning, bastinado, birching, or strapping. Legal corporal punishment is forbidden in most countries, but it still is a form of legal punishment practiced according to the legislations of Brunei, Iran, Libya, the Maldives, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, Yemen, and Qatar, as well as parts of Indonesia and Nigeria.

Rape in Saudi Arabia is regulated by Saudi Arabia's interpretation of Sharia law, under which someone convicted of the criminal offense of rape can be sentenced to a variety of punishments, ranging from flogging to execution. In 2019, eight executions took place in Saudi Arabia for rape.

Kyrkoplikt was a historical form of punishment, practiced in Sweden and Finland. It was a form of public humiliation in which the condemned was made to confess and repent of their crime before being rehabilitated and spared further punishments. It could be sentenced by the church or by a secular court, and performed by the church. The concept of "church duty" thus does not have anything to do with an obligation to go to church, in spite of the name (kyrkogångsplikt, literally 'church attendance obligation').

References

  1. Deardorff, Julie (April 20, 2000). "Shame Returns As Punishment".
  2. Pundak, Chen; Steinhart, Yael; Goldenberg, Jacob (July 2, 2021). "Nonmaleficence in Shaming: The Ethical Dilemma Underlying Participation in Online Public Shaming". Journal of Consumer Psychology. 31 (3): 478–500. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1227 via CrossRef.
  3. Frevert, Ute (2020). The politics of humiliation: a modern history (First ed.). Oxford New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 48, 103. ISBN   9780198820314.
  4. "Article 87 ... shall be sentenced to flogging, having his head shaven, and one year of exile..." Archived 2017-08-26 at the Wayback Machine , Islamic Penal Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran
  5. 1 2 Beevor, Antony (5 June 2009). "An Ugly Carnival". The Guardian . Retrieved 13 July 2014.
  6. 1 2 Shorn Women: Gender and Punishment in Liberation France, ISBN   978-1-85973-584-8
  7. "Public Humiliation". encyclopedia.ushmm.org. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  8. Vinciguerra, Thomas (1 October 2000). "The Clothes That Make The Inmate". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  9. "Why the media in Japan, France and South Korea blur the handcuffs on the hands of suspects". ORDO News. 9 April 2022. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  10. Borowiec, Steven (3 November 2017). "South Korean Perp Walks: What's Up With the Blurred Handcuffs?". KOREA EXPOSÉ. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  11. "Cape Town and Surrounds". westerncape.gov.za. Government of South Africa . Retrieved 18 July 2012.
  12. Olarn, Kocha (23 January 2013). "Thai court sentences activist to 10 years in prison for insulting king - CNN.com". CNN .
  13. "Extradition hearing for arms dealer postponed". Taipei Times . 29 July 2008.
  14. Rodogno, Raffaele (2009). "Shame, Guilt, and Punishment". Law and Philosophy. 28 (5): 429–464. doi:10.1007/s10982-008-9042-x. ISSN   0167-5249. JSTOR   40284681. S2CID   144526838 . Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  15. Perlin, Michael L.; Weinstein, Naomi M. (26 December 2014). ""Friend to the Martyr, a Friend to the Woman of Shame": Thinking About the Law, Shame and Humiliation" (PDF). Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice . 24.
  16. Vellaram, Sandeep; Jayarajan, Sreedevi (1 July 2019). "22 injuries, 'Falanga' torture used: Shocking autopsy of Kerala custodial death victim". The News Minute. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  17. Scott (19 December 2013). History Of Corporal Punishment. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315828367. ISBN   9781315828367.
  18. Frevert, Ute (20 January 2021). "The history of humiliation points to the future of human dignity". Psyche.
  19. "Cat-o-nine tails, United Kingdom, 1700-1850". Science Museum Group. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  20. Horan, Leo F. S. (1 September 1950). "Flogging In The United States Navy". U.S. Naval Institute. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  21. UN Committee Against Torture. "Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Decision No. 551/2013" (PDF). United Nations. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  22. Patra, Pratap Kumar (2016). "Branding in children: a barbaric practice still exists in India". Pan African Medical Journal. 23: 62. doi:10.11604/pamj.2016.23.62.7968. eISSN   1937-8688. PMC   4862791 . PMID   27217887.
  23. Corlew, Robert Ewing (1990). Tennessee, a Short History. Univ. of Tennessee Press. ISBN   978-0-87049-647-9.
  24. Sieber, Karen (8 February 2021). "The hidden story of when two Black college students were tarred and feathered". The Conversation.
  25. Cox, James (Spring 2009). "Bilboes, Brands, and Branks: Colonial Crimes and Punishments". Colonial Williamsburg Journal .
  26. McBride-Ahebee, Octavia (2011). Where My Birthmark Dances. Georgetown, Kentucky: Finishing Line Press. p. 6. ISBN   978-1-59924-827-1.
  27. McAlinden, Anne-Marie (2005). "The Use of 'Shame' with Sexual Offenders" (PDF). The British Journal of Criminology. 45 (3): 373–394. doi:10.1093/bjc/azh095. ISSN   0007-0955. JSTOR   23639325 . Retrieved 17 April 2022.
  28. SULLUM, JACOB (25 August 2020). "The Onerous Burdens of Sex Offender Registration Are Not Punishment, the 10th Circuit Rules. They Just Feel That Way". Reason.com. Retrieved 17 April 2022.
  29. Shim, Jane (13 August 2014). "These States Stick People With a Lifetime of Restrictions for Decades-Old, Nonviolent Sex Offenses". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 17 April 2022.
  30. "50-State Comparison: Relief from Sex Offense Registration Obligations". Restoration of Rights Project. Retrieved 17 April 2022.
  31. Mitchell, Kirk (1 September 2017). "Colorado sex offender registration act is unconstitutional, federal judge declares". The Denver Post. Retrieved 17 April 2022.
  32. "Registration not cruel and unusual punishment, says Tenth Circuit". 23 August 2020.

Further reading