Quantum heat engines

Quantum heat engine

Process type	Heat engine

A quantum heat engine (QHE) generates power from heat flow between hot and cold reservoirs, operating under the principles of quantum mechanics.

History

Scovil and Schulz-DuBois first connected the quantum amplifier to Carnot efficiency in 1959, building a quantum heat engine with a 3-level maser. ^[1] Geusic, Schulz-DuBois, De Grasse, and Scovil proposed quantum refrigerators, which pump heat from a cold to a hot reservoir using power, in the same year. ^[2] Wineland and Hänsch suggested laser-driven processes, termed optical pumping or laser cooling. ^{[3] [4] [5]} Alicki reported that heat engines and refrigerators can function at the single-particle scale, necessitating quantum thermodynamics. ^[6]

3-level amplifier

Three-level amplifier: Levels 1 and 3 couple to the hot reservoir, levels 1 and 2 to the cold reservoir. Power results from population inversion between levels 3 and 2.

A 3-level amplifier uses hot and cold reservoirs to maintain population inversion between two energy levels, amplifying light via stimulated emission. ^[7] The ground level (1-g) and excited level (3-h) connect to a hot reservoir at temperature ${\displaystyle T_{\text{h}}}$, with an energy gap ${\displaystyle \hbar \omega _{\text{h}}=E_{3}-E_{1}}$. At equilibrium, the population ratio is: $${\displaystyle {\frac {N_{\text{h}}}{N_{\text{g}}}}=e^{-{\frac {\hbar \omega _{\text{h}}}{k_{\text{B}}T_{\text{h}}}}},}$$ where ${\displaystyle \hbar ={\frac {h}{2\pi }}}$ is the Planck constant, and ${\displaystyle k_{\text{B}}}$ is the Boltzmann constant. A cold reservoir at temperature ${\displaystyle T_{\text{c}}}$ couples the ground level (1-g) to an intermediate level (2-c), with an energy gap ${\displaystyle E_{2}-E_{1}=\hbar \omega _{\text{c}}}$. At equilibrium: $${\displaystyle {\frac {N_{\text{c}}}{N_{\text{g}}}}=e^{-{\frac {\hbar \omega _{\text{c}}}{k_{\text{B}}T_{\text{c}}}}}.}$$ The device amplifies when levels 3-h and 2-c couple to an external field of frequency ${\displaystyle \nu =\omega _{\text{h}}-\omega _{\text{c}}}$. Efficiency, defined as the ratio of work output to heat input, is: $${\displaystyle \eta ={\frac {\hbar \nu }{\hbar \omega _{\text{h}}}}=1-{\frac {\omega _{\text{c}}}{\omega _{\text{h}}}}.}$$ Amplification requires population inversion: $${\displaystyle G=N_{\text{h}}-N_{\text{c}}\geq 0,}$$ equivalent to: $${\displaystyle {\frac {\hbar \omega _{\text{c}}}{k_{\text{B}}T_{\text{c}}}}\geq {\frac {\hbar \omega _{\text{h}}}{k_{\text{B}}T_{\text{h}}}}.}$$ This leads to an efficiency limit: $${\displaystyle \eta \leq 1-{\frac {T_{\text{c}}}{T_{\text{h}}}}=\eta _{\text{c}},}$$ where ${\displaystyle \eta _{\text{c}}}$ is the Carnot cycle efficiency, achieved at zero gain (${\displaystyle G=0}$). Reversing the process creates a refrigerator, with a coefficient of performance (COP): $${\displaystyle \epsilon ={\frac {\omega _{\text{c}}}{\nu }}\leq {\frac {T_{\text{c}}}{T_{\text{h}}-T_{\text{c}}}}.}$$

Types

Quantum devices operate either continuously or via reciprocating cycles. Continuous devices include solar cells, thermoelectric devices (outputting current), and lasers (outputting coherent light). Continuous refrigerators use optical pumping or laser cooling. ^{[8] [9]} Reciprocating devices, such as four-stroke or two-stroke machines, mimic classical engines with non-commuting strokes. Common cycles include the Carnot cycle ^{[10] [11]} and Otto cycle. ^[12] These cycles yield equations of motion for the working medium and heat flux.

Reciprocating

See also: Reciprocating heat engine

Researchers studied quantum versions of thermodynamic cycles, including the Carnot cycle, ^{[10] [11] [13]} Stirling cycle, ^[14] and Otto cycle. ^{[12] [15]} The Otto cycle serves as a model for other reciprocating cycles.

Quantum Otto cycle in the Entropy ${\displaystyle \Omega }$ plane, showing energy entropy and Von Neumann entropy. ${\displaystyle \Omega }$ represents the externally controlled internal frequency, mimicking inverse volume in the Otto cycle. Red and blue lines indicate hot and cold isochores. The cycle represents a heat pump.

The Otto cycle consists of four segments:

• Segment ${\displaystyle A\rightarrow B}$: Isomagnetic or isochoric process, partial equilibration with the cold reservoir, described by propagator ${\displaystyle U_{\text{c}}}$.
• Segment ${\displaystyle B\rightarrow C}$: Magnetization or adiabatic compression, expanding energy level gaps in the Hamiltonian, described by propagator ${\displaystyle U_{\text{ch}}}$.
• Segment ${\displaystyle C\rightarrow D}$: Isomagnetic or isochoric process, partial equilibration with the hot reservoir, described by propagator ${\displaystyle U_{\text{h}}}$.
• Segment ${\displaystyle D\rightarrow A}$: Demagnetization or adiabatic expansion, reducing energy gaps, described by propagator ${\displaystyle U_{\text{hc}}}$. The cycle's propagator is: $${\displaystyle U_{\text{global}}=U_{\text{hc}}U_{\text{h}}U_{\text{ch}}U_{\text{c}}.}$$

Propagators are linear operators that define the working medium's state. Consecutive propagators do not commute (${\displaystyle [U_{i},U_{j}]\neq 0}$), ensuring non-zero power. The working medium, such as spin systems ^[16] or harmonic oscillators, ^[17] requires optimized cycle time. At long cycle times (${\displaystyle \tau _{\text{cyc}}\gg 2\pi /\omega }$), the engine operates quasi-adiabatically, with efficiency ${\displaystyle \eta =1-{\frac {\omega _{\text{c}}}{\omega _{\text{h}}}}}$, below Carnot efficiency. At high temperatures, efficiency at maximum power is ${\displaystyle \eta =1-{\sqrt {\frac {T_{\text{c}}}{T_{\text{h}}}}}}$, matching endoreversible thermodynamics. ^[17] Short cycle times cause friction-like effects due to non-adiabatic changes, increasing power demands and coherence-induced dissipation. Frictionless solutions exist for finite-time adiabatic expansion/compression. ^{[18] [19]} Optimal performance occurs when coherence is minimized. At very short cycle times (${\displaystyle \tau _{\text{cyc}}\ll 2\pi /\omega }$), coherence enhances power. ^[20] Allahverdyan, Hovhannisyan, and Mahler proposed a two-stroke quantum cycle using two qubits with frequencies ${\displaystyle \omega _{\text{h}}}$ and ${\displaystyle \omega _{\text{c}}}$. The first stroke partially equilibrates the qubits with hot and cold reservoirs. The second stroke swaps qubit states, preserving entropy and generating power. ^{[21] [22]} Quantum Otto cycle refrigerators align with magnetic refrigeration. ^[23]

Continuous

Continuous engines, analogous to turbines, couple to an external periodic field, typically the electromagnetic field, modeling a laser. ^[9] Models vary by working medium and heat reservoirs. Studied systems include two-level, ^[24] three-level, ^[25] four-level, ^{[26] [27]} and coupled harmonic oscillators. ^[28] Periodic driving splits the energy levels, enabling selective coupling to reservoirs and power production. Ignoring this splitting in equations of motion violates the second law of thermodynamics. ^[29] Scully proposed non-thermal fuels, such as coherence or squeezed thermal baths, to increase the hot reservoir's energy without raising entropy, complying with the second law. ^{[30] [31]}

Equivalence of heat machines

Uzdin, Levy, and Kosloff reported that two-stroke, four-stroke, and continuous quantum engines become thermodynamically equivalent in a quantum regime, producing identical work and heat with the same efficiency, driven by coherent work extraction without a classical analogue. Klatzow and others experimentally confirmed these quantum effects. ^{[32] [33]}

Open systems

Elementary quantum heat engines operate near equilibrium, with discrete energy levels as their primary quantum feature. Realistic devices, operating out of equilibrium, experience friction, heat leaks, and finite heat flow. Quantum thermodynamics provides a dynamical framework for such systems. Open quantum system theory describes the working medium's dynamics, tracing out the reservoirs. The total Hamiltonian is: $${\displaystyle H=H_{\text{s}}+H_{\text{c}}+H_{\text{h}}+H_{\text{sc}}+H_{\text{sh}},}$$ where ${\displaystyle H_{\text{s}}(t)}$ is time-dependent. The reduced equation of motion is: $${\displaystyle {\frac {d}{dt}}\rho =-{\frac {i}{\hbar }}[H_{\text{s}},\rho ]+L_{\text{h}}(\rho )+L_{\text{c}}(\rho ),}$$ where ${\displaystyle \rho }$ is the density operator, and ${\displaystyle L_{\text{h/c}}}$ represents dissipative dynamics. Energy change is: $${\displaystyle {\frac {d}{dt}}E=\left\langle {\frac {\partial H_{\text{s}}}{\partial t}}\right\rangle +\langle L_{\text{h}}(H_{\text{s}})\rangle +\langle L_{\text{c}}(H_{\text{s}})\rangle ,}$$ yielding the dynamical first law of thermodynamics: ^[6] * Power: ${\displaystyle P=\left\langle {\frac {\partial H}{\partial t}}\right\rangle }$ * Heat currents: ${\displaystyle J_{\text{h}}=\langle L_{\text{h}}(H_{\text{s}})\rangle }$, ${\displaystyle J_{\text{c}}=\langle L_{\text{c}}(H_{\text{s}})\rangle }$. Entropy production rate is: $${\displaystyle {\frac {dS}{dt}}=-{\frac {J_{\text{h}}}{T_{\text{h}}}}-{\frac {J_{\text{c}}}{T_{\text{c}}}}\geq 0.}$$ A thermodynamically consistent derivation uses the weak coupling limit, assuming uncorrelated system and reservoirs: $${\displaystyle \rho =\rho _{\text{s}}\otimes \rho _{\text{h}}\otimes \rho _{\text{c}}.}$$ The equation of motion becomes: $${\displaystyle {\frac {d}{dt}}\rho _{\text{s}}=L\rho _{\text{s}},}$$ where ${\displaystyle L}$ is the Liouville superoperator, often in the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad form. ^[34] Strong coupling theories also exist. ^{[35] [36] [37]}

Refrigerators

Absorption

The absorption refrigerator, an autonomous quantum device, requires no external power or intervention. ^{[38] [39] [40]} It uses three reservoirs: power (${\displaystyle T_{\text{d}}}$), hot (${\displaystyle T_{\text{h}}}$), and cold (${\displaystyle T_{\text{c}}}$).

Quantum tricycle absorption refrigerator with three reservoirs (${\displaystyle T_{\text{d}}\geq T_{\text{h}}\geq T_{\text{c}}}$). Heat flows from the power and cold reservoirs to the hot reservoir.

The tricycle model uses three oscillators: $${\displaystyle H_{0}=\hbar \omega _{\text{h}}a^{\dagger }a+\hbar \omega _{\text{c}}b^{\dagger }b+\hbar \omega _{\text{d}}c^{\dagger }c,}$$with resonance condition ${\displaystyle \omega _{\text{d}}=\omega _{\text{h}}-\omega _{\text{c}}}$. The refrigerator removes excitations from the cold and power reservoirs, generating an excitation in the hot reservoir. The interaction Hamiltonian is: $${\displaystyle H_{I}=\hbar \epsilon (ab^{\dagger }c^{\dagger }+a^{\dagger }bc),}$$where ${\displaystyle \epsilon }$ is the coupling strength. Energy balance follows the first law of thermodynamics: $${\displaystyle {\frac {dE_{\text{s}}}{dt}}=J_{\text{h}}+J_{\text{c}}+J_{\text{d}}.}$$ At steady state, ${\displaystyle {\frac {dE_{\text{s}}}{dt}}=0}$. Entropy production, per the second law of thermodynamics, is: $${\displaystyle {\frac {d}{dt}}\Delta S_{\text{u}}=-{\frac {J_{\text{h}}}{T_{\text{h}}}}-{\frac {J_{\text{c}}}{T_{\text{c}}}}-{\frac {J_{\text{d}}}{T_{\text{d}}}}\geq 0.}$$ When ${\displaystyle T_{\text{d}}\rightarrow \infty }$, the power reservoir produces no entropy, yielding pure power: ${\displaystyle P=J_{\text{d}}}$. Aamir and others implemented this in a superconducting circuit to reset a Qubit. ^[41]

Quantum

Nernst proposed two formulations of the third law of thermodynamics. The Nernst heat theorem states that a pure substance's entropy approaches zero as temperature nears absolute zero. The unattainability principle states that no procedure can cool a system to absolute zero in finite operations. ^[42] At steady state, the second law of thermodynamics requires non-negative entropy production. As the cold reservoir approaches absolute zero, entropy production must scale as: $${\displaystyle {\dot {S}}_{\text{c}}\propto -T_{\text{c}}^{\alpha },\alpha \geq 0.}$$The third law strengthens this to ${\displaystyle \alpha >0}$, ensuring zero entropy production at absolute zero (${\displaystyle {\dot {S}}_{\text{c}}=0}$), with heat current scaling as ${\displaystyle J_{\text{c}}\propto T_{\text{c}}^{\alpha +1}}$. The unattainability principle, rephrased by Levy, Alicki, and Kosloff, states that no refrigerator can reach absolute zero in finite time. ^[43] Cooling dynamics follow: $${\displaystyle J_{\text{c}}(T_{\text{c}}(t))=-c_{V}(T_{\text{c}}(t)){\frac {dT_{\text{c}}(t)}{dt}},}$$

where ${\displaystyle c_{V}(T_{\text{c}})}$ is the reservoir's heat capacity. With ${\displaystyle J_{\text{c}}\propto T_{\text{c}}^{\alpha +1}}$ and ${\displaystyle c_{V}\sim T_{\text{c}}^{\eta }}$ (${\displaystyle \eta \geq 0}$), the cooling exponent is: $${\displaystyle {\frac {dT_{\text{c}}(t)}{dt}}\propto -T_{\text{c}}^{\zeta },\zeta =\alpha -\eta +1.}$$ If ${\displaystyle \zeta <0}$, cooling to absolute zero in finite time violates the third law, making the unattainability principle more restrictive than the Nernst heat theorem.

Reciprocating devices have been suggested operating by either the Carnot cycle ^{[10] [11]} or the Otto cycle. ^[12]

In both types the quantum description allows to obtain equation of motion for the working medium and the heat flux.

when the cycle is completed they all turn out to provide the same amount of work and consume the same amount of heat (hence they share the same efficiency as well). This equivalence is associated with a coherent work extraction mechanism and has no classical analogue. These quantum features have been demonstrated experimentally. ^[33]

References

1. Scovil, H. E. D.; Schulz-DuBois, E. O. (1959). "Three-Level Masers as Heat Engines". Physical Review Letters. 2 (6): 262–263. Bibcode:1959PhRvL...2..262S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.262. ISSN   0031-9007.
2. Geusic, J. E.; Bois, E. O. Schulz-Du; De Grasse, R. W.; Scovil, H. E. D. (1959). "Three Level Spin Refrigeration and Maser Action at 1500 mc/sec". Journal of Applied Physics. 30 (7): 1113–1114. Bibcode:1959JAp....30.1113G. doi:10.1063/1.1776991. ISSN   0021-8979.
3. D. J. Wineland; H. Dehmelt (1975). "Proposed 10¹⁴Δν < ν Laser Fluorescence Spectroscopy on Tl⁺ Mono-Ion Oscillator III" (PDF). Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20: 637.
4. Hänsch, T. W.; Schawlow, A. L. (1975). "Cooling of gases by laser radiation". Optics Communications. 13 (1): 68–69. Bibcode:1975OptCo..13...68H. doi: 10.1016/0030-4018(75)90159-5 . ISSN   0030-4018.
5. Letokhov, V. S.; Minogin, V. G.; Pavlik, B. D. (1976). "Cooling and trapping of atoms and molecules by a resonant laser field". Optics Communications. 19 (1): 72–75. Bibcode:1976OptCo..19...72L. doi:10.1016/0030-4018(76)90388-6. ISSN   0030-4018.
6. Alicki, R. (1979). "The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 12 (5): L103 –L107. Bibcode:1979JPhA...12L.103A. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/12/5/007. ISSN   0305-4470.
7. Yariv, Amnon (1989). Quantum Electronics, 3rd ed., Wiley. ISBN   0-471-60997-8.
8. Narevicius, Edvardas; Bannerman, S Travis; Raizen, Mark G (2009). "Single-photon molecular cooling". New Journal of Physics. 11 (5) 055046. arXiv: 0808.1383 . Bibcode:2009NJPh...11e5046N. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/5/055046 . ISSN   1367-2630.
9. Kosloff, Ronnie; Levy, Amikam (2014). "Quantum Heat Engines and Refrigerators: Continuous Devices". Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 65 (1): 365–393. arXiv: 1310.0683 . Bibcode:2014ARPC...65..365K. doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103724. ISSN   0066-426X. PMID   24689798. S2CID   25266545.
10. Geva, Eitan; Kosloff, Ronnie (1992). "A quantum-mechanical heat engine operating in finite time. A model consisting of spin-1/2 systems as the working fluid". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 96 (4): 3054–3067. Bibcode:1992JChPh..96.3054G. doi:10.1063/1.461951. ISSN   0021-9606.
11. Bender, Carl M; Brody, Dorje C; Meister, Bernhard K (2000). "Quantum mechanical Carnot engine". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 33 (24): 4427–4436. arXiv: quant-ph/0007002 . Bibcode:2000JPhA...33.4427B. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/24/302. ISSN   0305-4470. S2CID   5335.
12. Feldmann, Tova; Kosloff, Ronnie (2000). "Performance of discrete heat engines and heat pumps in finite time". Physical Review E. 61 (5): 4774–4790. arXiv: physics/0003007 . Bibcode:2000PhRvE..61.4774F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4774. ISSN   1063-651X. PMID   11031518. S2CID   2277942.
13. Quan, H. T.; Liu, Yu-xi; Sun, C. P.; Nori, Franco (2007). "Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quantum heat engines". Physical Review E. 76 (3) 031105. arXiv: quant-ph/0611275 . Bibcode:2007PhRvE..76c1105Q. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.031105. ISSN   1539-3755. PMID   17930197. S2CID   3009953.
14. Wu, F.; Chen, L.; Sun, F.; Wu, C.; Zhu, Yonghong (1998). "Performance and optimization criteria for forward and reverse quantum Stirling cycles". Energy Conversion and Management. 39 (8): 733–739. Bibcode:1998ECM....39..733W. doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(97)10037-1. ISSN   0196-8904.
15. Kieu, T. D. (2006). "Quantum heat engines, the second law and Maxwell's daemon". The European Physical Journal D. 39 (1): 115–128. arXiv: quant-ph/0311157 . Bibcode:2006EPJD...39..115K. doi:10.1140/epjd/e2006-00075-5. ISSN   1434-6060. S2CID   119382163.
16. Feldmann, Tova; Kosloff, Ronnie (2003). "Quantum four-stroke heat engine: Thermodynamic observables in a model with intrinsic friction". Physical Review E. 68 (1) 016101. arXiv: quant-ph/0303046 . Bibcode:2003PhRvE..68a6101F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.68.016101. ISSN   1063-651X. PMID   12935194. S2CID   23777311.
17. Rezek, Yair; Kosloff, Ronnie (2006). "Irreversible performance of a quantum harmonic heat engine". New Journal of Physics. 8 (5): 83. arXiv: quant-ph/0601006 . Bibcode:2006NJPh....8...83R. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/8/5/083 . ISSN   1367-2630.
18. Campo, A. del; Goold, J.; Paternostro, M. (2014). "More bang for your buck: Super-adiabatic quantum engines". Scientific Reports. 4 (1): 6208. arXiv: 1305.3223 . Bibcode:2014NatSR...4.6208C. doi: 10.1038/srep06208 . ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   4147366 . PMID   25163421.
19. Beau, Mathieu; Jaramillo, Juan; del Campo, Adolfo (2016). "Scaling-Up Quantum Heat Engines Efficiently via Shortcuts to Adiabaticity". Entropy. 18 (5): 168. arXiv: 1603.06019 . Bibcode:2016Entrp..18..168B. doi: 10.3390/e18050168 . ISSN   1099-4300.
20. Feldmann, Tova; Kosloff, Ronnie (2012). "Short time cycles of purely quantum refrigerators". Physical Review E. 85 (5) 051114. arXiv: 1204.4059 . Bibcode:2012PhRvE..85e1114F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.85.051114. ISSN   1539-3755. PMID   23004710. S2CID   31174895.
21. Allahverdyan, Armen E.; Hovhannisyan, Karen; Mahler, Guenter (2010). "Optimal refrigerator". Physical Review E. 81 (5) 051129. arXiv: 1007.4307 . Bibcode:2010PhRvE..81e1129A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.81.051129. ISSN   1539-3755. PMID   20866207. S2CID   12750223.
22. Uzdin, Raam; Kosloff, Ronnie (2014). "The multilevel four-stroke swap engine and its environment". New Journal of Physics. 16 (9) 095003. arXiv: 1404.6182 . Bibcode:2014NJPh...16i5003U. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/9/095003 . ISSN   1367-2630.
23. Shirron, Peter J.; McCammon, Dan (2014). "Salt pill design and fabrication for adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators". Cryogenics. 62: 163–171. Bibcode:2014Cryo...62..163S. doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2014.03.022. ISSN   0011-2275.
24. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, D.; Alicki, R.; Kurizki, G. (2013). "Minimal universal quantum heat machine". Physical Review E. 87 (1) 012140. arXiv: 1209.1190 . Bibcode:2013PhRvE..87a2140G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.87.012140. ISSN   1539-3755. PMID   23410316. S2CID   18826566.
25. Geva, Eitan; Kosloff, Ronnie (1996). "The quantum heat engine and heat pump: An irreversible thermodynamic analysis of the three-level amplifier". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 104 (19): 7681–7699. Bibcode:1996JChPh.104.7681G. doi:10.1063/1.471453. ISSN   0021-9606.
26. Scully, M. O.; Chapin, K. R.; Dorfman, K. E.; Kim, M. B.; Svidzinsky, A. (2011). "Quantum heat engine power can be increased by noise-induced coherence". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (37): 15097–15100. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10815097S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110234108 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   3174605 . PMID   21876187.
27. Harbola, Upendra; Rahav, Saar; Mukamel, Shaul (2012). "Quantum heat engines: A thermodynamic analysis of power and efficiency" . EPL (Europhysics Letters). 99 (5) 50005. Bibcode:2012EL.....9950005H. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/99/50005. ISSN   0295-5075. S2CID   13833767.
28. Kosloff, Ronnie (1984). "A quantum mechanical open system as a model of a heat engine". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 80 (4): 1625–1631. Bibcode:1984JChPh..80.1625K. doi:10.1063/1.446862. ISSN   0021-9606.
29. Szczygielski, Krzysztof; Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, David; Alicki, Robert (2013). "Markovian master equation and thermodynamics of a two-level system in a strong laser field". Physical Review E. 87 (1) 012120. arXiv: 1211.5665 . Bibcode:2013PhRvE..87a2120S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.87.012120. ISSN   1539-3755. PMID   23410296. S2CID   25511420.
30. Scully, M. O. (2003). "Extracting Work from a Single Heat Bath via Vanishing Quantum Coherence". Science. 299 (5608): 862–864. Bibcode:2003Sci...299..862S. doi: 10.1126/science.1078955 . ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   12511655. S2CID   120884236.
31. Roßnagel, J.; Abah, O.; Schmidt-Kaler, F.; Singer, K.; Lutz, E. (2014). "Nanoscale Heat Engine Beyond the Carnot Limit". Physical Review Letters. 112 (3) 030602. arXiv: 1308.5935 . Bibcode:2014PhRvL.112c0602R. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.030602. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   24484127. S2CID   1826585.
32. Uzdin, Raam; Levy, Amikam; Kosloff, Ronnie (2015). "Equivalence of Quantum Heat Machines, and Quantum-Thermodynamic Signatures". Physical Review X. 5 (3) 031044. arXiv: 1502.06592 . Bibcode:2015PhRvX...5c1044U. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.031044 . ISSN   2160-3308.
33. Klatzow, James; Becker, Jonas N; Ledingham, Patrick M; Weinzetl, Christian; Kaczmarek, Krzysztof T; Saunders, Dylan J; Nunn, Joshua; Walmsley, Ian A; Uzdin, Raam; Poem, Eilon (2019). "Experimental demonstration of quantum effects in the operation of microscopic heat engines". Physical Review Letters. 122 (11) 110601. arXiv: 1710.08716 . Bibcode:2019PhRvL.122k0601K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.110601. ISSN   1079-7114. PMID   30951320. S2CID   206318713.
34. Kosloff, Ronnie (2013). "Quantum Thermodynamics: A Dynamical Viewpoint". Entropy. 15 (12): 2100–2128. arXiv: 1305.2268 . Bibcode:2013Entrp..15.2100K. doi: 10.3390/e15062100 . ISSN   1099-4300.
35. Ludovico, M. F.; Lim, J. S.; Moskalets, M.; Arrachea, L.; Sánchez, D. (21 April 2014). "Dynamical energy transfer in ac-driven quantum systems". Physical Review B. 89 (16) 161306. arXiv: 1311.4945 . Bibcode:2014PhRvB..89p1306L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.161306. hdl: 10261/116187 . S2CID   119265583.
36. Gallego, R; Riera, A; Eisert, J (2014). "Thermal machines beyond the weak coupling regime". New Journal of Physics. 16 (12) 125009. arXiv: 1310.8349 . Bibcode:2014NJPh...16l5009G. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/12/125009 . ISSN   1367-2630.
37. Esposito, Massimiliano; Ochoa, Maicol A.; Galperin, Michael (2015). "Quantum Thermodynamics: A Nonequilibrium Green's Function Approach". Physical Review Letters. 114 (8) 080602. arXiv: 1411.1800 . Bibcode:2015PhRvL.114h0602E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.080602. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   25768745. S2CID   11498686.
38. Palao, José P.; Kosloff, Ronnie; Gordon, Jeffrey M. (2001). "Quantum thermodynamic cooling cycle". Physical Review E. 64 (5) 056130. arXiv: quant-ph/0106048 . Bibcode:2001PhRvE..64e6130P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.056130. ISSN   1063-651X. PMID   11736037. S2CID   8201978.
39. Linden, Noah; Popescu, Sandu; Skrzypczyk, Paul (2010). "How Small Can Thermal Machines Be? The Smallest Possible Refrigerator". Physical Review Letters. 105 (13) 130401. arXiv: 0908.2076 . Bibcode:2010PhRvL.105m0401L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.130401. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   21230755. S2CID   2707740.
40. Levy, Amikam; Kosloff, Ronnie (2012). "Quantum Absorption Refrigerator". Physical Review Letters. 108 (7) 070604. arXiv: 1109.0728 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.070604. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   22401189. S2CID   6981288.{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |bic= ignored (help)
41. Aamir, Mohammed Ali; Suria, Paul Jamet; Guzmán, José Antonio Marín; Castillo-Moreno, Claudia; Epstein, Jeffrey M; Halpern, Nicole Yunger; Gasparinetti, Simone (2025). "Thermally driven quantum refrigerator autonomously resets a superconducting qubit". Nat. Phys. 21 (5) 318–323. doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02708-5. ISSN   1063-651X.
42. Landsberg, P. T. (1956). "Foundations of Thermodynamics". Reviews of Modern Physics. 28 (4): 363–392. Bibcode:1956RvMP...28..363L. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.28.363. ISSN   0034-6861.
43. Levy, Amikam; Alicki, Robert; Kosloff, Ronnie (2012). "Quantum refrigerators and the third law of thermodynamics". Physical Review E. 85 (6) 061126. arXiv: 1205.1347 . Bibcode:2012PhRvE..85f1126L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.85.061126. ISSN   1539-3755. PMID   23005070. S2CID   24251763.

Further reading

Deffner, Sebastian and Campbell, Steve. "Quantum Thermodynamics: An introduction to the thermodynamics of quantum information", (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2019). ^[1]

F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, G. Adesso (eds.) "Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime. Fundamental Aspects and New Directions." (Springer 2018)

Gemmer, Jochen, M. Michel, and Günter Mahler. "Quantum thermodynamics. Emergence of thermodynamic behavior within composite quantum systems. 2." (2009).

Petruccione, Francesco, and Heinz-Peter Breuer. The theory of open quantum systems. Oxford university press, 2002.

External links

• "Nanoscale heat engine exceeds standard efficiency limit". phys.org.

1. Deffner, Sebastian (2019). Quantum Thermodynamics. doi:10.1088/2053-2571/ab21c6. ISBN   978-1-64327-658-8. S2CID   195791624.