The Rondo in A minor, K. 511, is a work for solo piano by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.
Mozart recorded the completion of the Rondo in his personal thematic catalog on 11 March 1787; [lower-alpha 1] he was age 31 at the time and had only recently returned from a triumphant journey to Prague, where he witnessed great success for a new production of his 1786 opera The Marriage of Figaro , for his Symphony No. 38, and for his own solo piano performances. [2] [3] notes some other major works of this stage in Mozart's life: the Rondo shortly preceded the beginning of work on Don Giovanni ; and instrumental pieces from 1787 include the Third and Fourth String Quintets as well as the string serenade Eine kleine Nachtmusik .
No musical sketches for the Rondo survive. This is not surprising, since as Ulrich Konrad has noted, none of the many surviving Mozart sketches are for solo keyboard works; apparently Mozart felt no need to sketch in his native performing medium. [4] Simon Keefe even suggests that the Rondo was not created through ordinary musical composition but rather was improvised on the spot, perhaps before an audience in Prague during his trip there (January–February 1787), or at a Vienna concert on 11 February 1787. [5]
No record survives of Mozart having premiered the completed Rondo in public. Aside from Keefe's suggestion above, a different guess is entertained by Scheideler: "Since subscription [i.e., benefit] concerts of two of [Mozart's] musician friends took place shortly after he completed the work (that of the oboist Friedrich Ramm on 14 March and of the bass singer Ludwig Karl Fischer on 21 March), and works by Mozart were ascertainably performed there ... it seems plausible to assume that the Rondo in A minor was also given its first performance at one of these concerts." [2]
The Rondo was published (1787) by Franz Anton Hoffmeister in Vienna, and reissued by a variety of publishers in the years after Mozart's death in 1791. [6] The Hoffmeister publication consisted of a volume of works for piano by Mozart and other composers; it was issued as part of a monthly subscription series [lower-alpha 2] entitled Prénumération pour le Forte Piano ou Clavecin. [7] [ incomplete short citation ]. The title is in French. For "prénumération" see Praenumeration. "Pour le Forte Piano ou Clavecin" means "for the piano or harpsichord". The specific term fortepiano is widely used in modern times to designate the early version of the piano for which Mozart composed; in Mozart's day it was simply one of several words used to denote the piano. Concerning "or harpsichord", an effective performance of the Rondo on this instrument seems hard to imagine, but well into Beethoven's time music publishers used the phrase "or harpsichord" to encourage sales of music composed for piano, including even the "Moonlight" Sonata.
An alternative to buying printed music in Mozart's day was the purchase of handwritten copies. [8] Later in 1787 (17 October), an advertisement in the Wiener Zeitung announced that manuscript copies of the Rondo (price 1 florin) were available from the copyist Johann Traeg, who had previously issued three of Mozart's piano concertos. [9] Traeg frequently produced unauthorized copies of composers' works; there is no evidence whether or not his version the Rondo was created with Mozart's cooperation.
Several editions of the Rondo are available today. The modern editor will generally rely on surviving copies of the Hoffmeister edition and on facsimile editions of the original autograph (hand-written) manuscript. [lower-alpha 3] The two sources differ in dozens of places, though mostly just in details of phrasing or articulation. The edition by Scheideler relies primarily on the autograph, but includes a list of all the divergences. [lower-alpha 4] [2]
The work consists of a single movement; it is in 6/8 time and the tempo marking is Andante.
The work follows the common A–B–A–C–A pattern characteristic of the rondo form; "A" is a returning theme and "B" and "C" are episodes. "A" is in A minor (the key of the piece), "B" is in F major, and "C" is in A major. Following the last appearance of "A" there is a coda that draws on the music for A as well as a minor key version of C.
Each of the five major sections is itself structured. "A" is in ternary form, "a b a", opening with a passage "a" in A minor, a middle section "b" that modulates to C major (the relative major), then an ornamented repetition of "a". The middle rendition of "A" is truncated, consisting of just one repetition of "a" rather than the full "a b a". [10]
Concerning the episodes "B" and "C", Forte suggests that each is a brief instantiation of sonata form; it moves to the dominant key in the first part (exposition), and in the second part first explores remote keys (development) then returns to the original material all in the tonic key (recapitulation). [10] Each episode ends in a transitional passage returning to the key of the following "A" section; Forte notes that these transitions are "very long in comparison to the other parts." [10]
As Cowdery notes, the three main sections "A", "B", and "C" divide the beat into progressively smaller units: "A" primarily uses eighth notes while "B" uses sixteenths and "C" uses triplet sixteenths. [11]
The work abounds in chromatic passages (i.e., involving closely spaced notes drawn from outside the set of pitches of the keynote scale). For example, in the third and fourth bars, the melody line covers the first eight notes of the ascending chromatic scale going upward from the tonic note (A, B♭, B, C, C♯, D, D♯, E).
The "A" section is ornamented with increasing extravagance with each of its returns.
The transitions from "B" and "C" back to "A" are in free form and bear the hallmarks of a fantasia or concerto cadenza, with rapid modulations to new keys, "drifting arpeggios and diminished harmonies". [12]
Since the work is so heavily ornamented, performers are obliged to arrive at decisions concerning the meaning of Mozart's musical notation for the ornaments. Konrad Wolff offers a clear criterion, namely an appeal to the influential textbook on violin playing written (and published in Mozart's birth year 1756) by the composer's father Leopold: "As for embellishments, Mozart was very much his father's child, which is to say that one can find most answers by studying Leopold Mozart's Gründliche Violinschule ." Based on this criterion, Wolff judges that in general, performers should play embellishments on, rather than before, the beat – though for the main theme of the K. 511 rondo, which features a prominent triple grace note (see quotation above), Wolff allows for the possibility of playing it before the beat as well. [13]
In bars 134–135, the rising sequence of the main theme receives a particularly intense form of ornamentation: every note is trilled.
Wolff also addresses this sort of passage, saying "trill chains must be smoothly connected, with no accent given to the new trill tone at its entrance." The basis for his advice is a piano exercise taught by Mozart to his pupil Johann Nepomuk Hummel and recalled later by Hummel in his own textbook [lower-alpha 5]
A number of the ornaments and variations are not notated with signs, but simply written out by Mozart in ordinary music notation. These can be taken more or less at face value, but they are of great importance for performance practice nonetheless, as they bear on issues and controversies in historically informed performance. The reason is that many other works of Mozart are notated quite sparely, with nothing like the layers of ornamentation he added onto the repetitions of the main theme of the Rondo in A Minor. One view is that Mozart himself, who was famed for his ability at musical improvisation, would embellish such passages on the spot. However, when serving others, as in writing cadenzas for his piano concertos (which he improvised in his own performances) or writing for publication, he would fill in the details.
Robert Levin (1990) has argued forcefully that modern performers should ornament the plainer repeated passages of Mozart scores, just as (he believes) Mozart himself did; and he faults modern conservatories sharply for failing to provide young performers with the instruction (particularly in music theory) they would need to do this.
For performers who seek to follow Levin's recommendation, [lower-alpha 6] works like the Rondo in A Minor are of great value: the finished work, written out so painstakingly, is a sort of compendium of Mozartean ornamentational technique from which the modern player can learn. To help make this point, Levin juxtaposes all ten appearances of the Rondo's main motif in musical notation, illustrating the striking variety of decoration and restatement that Mozart achieved. [14]
One of the ways in which the main theme is decorated appears at measures 86–87: it is much like the ornamentation of measures 5–6, but the melody notes that would normally appear on the musical beat are delayed slightly, with a sixteenth rest appearing on the beat instead. The left hand plays on the beat as usual.
Measures 5–6:
Measures 86-87:
This kind of ornamentation has been identified as the 18th-century version of tempo rubato ; the left hand accompaniment remains steady, but the right hand imposes a slight delay in the melody notes. [15] Further discussion of this practice, with reference to K. 511 but also citation of 18th-century authorities, was provided by Roland Jackson. [16] The practice was described by Mozart himself in a letter to his father. [lower-alpha 7] [lower-alpha 8]
The Mozart scholar Hermann Abert offered a warm appreciation of the work: it "is one of the most important keyboard rondos ever composed. With its exotically tinged theme, it is a typically Mozartian piece in A minor, its first four bars, with their characteristic chromaticisms and dynamics, revealing an impassioned tension that is maintained through the whole movement, without ever achieving any resolution in an optimistic sense". Abert also appreciates the ways in which the two episodes are structurally related to the main theme; for instance the A major episode takes the cadential material of the main theme as its basis. [lower-alpha 9]
Robert Levin hears the work as despairing: "More than any other solo work it seems forlorn, dejected; its fundamental bleakness drags against the articulateness of the ornamentation, which struggles with increasing intensity against a manifestly hopeless fate." [18] Richard Wigmore takes the despair theme a step further, following a longstanding tradition in Mozart biography.Keefe (2017) , pp. 451–452 "With a Classical composer it is always dangerous to hear music as autobiography. But we do know that Mozart suffered a brief illness in the early spring of 1787, and that his popularity as a composer-virtuoso was on the wane. So perhaps it is not being over-fanciful to link the depressive, almost morbid tone of the Rondo ... to Mozart’s physical and emotional state." [19]
Vladimir Horowitz disagreed with the "despair" interpretation and cautioned in particular against letting it lead to dragging the tempo in performance. His remarks on the work were recorded by David Dubal: "People today think that slow playing means profound ... [Horowitz approached the piano and continued.] ... Here is how they play the Mozart Rondo in A minor. It goes on for eleven minutes with some pianists. They think that because it is in a minor key, that it must be Mozart at his most serious. But listen to how it needs to move. [He illustrates.] There are dance elements, too, in this rondo. It can't be academic. It is not really sad. It is pensive." [20] [lower-alpha 10]
The moody chromaticism of the work has reminded many listeners of the (decades later) piano music of Frédéric Chopin. Mitchell speculates a possible specific case of influence: "Chopin revered Mozart ...and this reverence influenced his own pianistic textures. (It is unthinkable, for example, that Chopin could have written his A minor mazurka, opus 17, no. 4, had he not known Mozart's rondo, K. 511.)" [21]
The Requiem in D minor, K. 626, is a Requiem Mass by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756–1791). Mozart composed part of the Requiem in Vienna in late 1791, but it was unfinished at his death on 5 December the same year. A completed version dated 1792 by Franz Xaver Süssmayr was delivered to Count Franz von Walsegg, who had commissioned the piece for a requiem service on 14 February 1792 to commemorate the first anniversary of the death of his wife Anna at the age of 20 on 14 February 1791.
Felix Mendelssohn's Violin Concerto in E minor, Op. 64, MWV O 14, is his last concerto. Well received at its premiere, it has remained among the most prominent and highly-regarded violin concertos. It holds a central place in the violin repertoire and has developed a reputation as an essential concerto for all aspiring concert violinists to master, and usually one of the first Romantic era concertos they learn. A typical performance lasts just under half an hour.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's Clarinet Concerto in A major, K. 622, was completed in October 1791 for the clarinettist Anton Stadler. It consists of three movements, in a fast–slow–fast succession.
The Piano Concerto No. 21 in C major, K. 467, was completed on 9 March 1785 by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, four weeks after the completion of the previous D minor concerto, K. 466.
The Piano Concerto No. 23 in A major K. 488 is a concerto for piano and orchestra written by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. It was finished, according to Mozart's own catalogue, on March 2, 1786, two months prior to the premiere of his opera, Le nozze di Figaro, and some three weeks prior to the completion of his next piano concerto. It was one of three subscription concerts given that spring and was probably played by Mozart himself at one of these.
The Piano Concerto No. 2 in B-flat major, Op. 19, by Ludwig van Beethoven was composed primarily between 1787 and 1789, although it did not attain the form in which it was published until 1795. Beethoven did write a second finale for it in 1798 for performance in Prague, but that is not the finale that was published. It was used by the composer as a vehicle for his own performances as a young virtuoso, initially intended with the Bonn Hofkapelle. It was published in December 1801 as Op. 19, later than the publication in March that year of his later composition the Piano Concerto No. 1 in C major as Op. 15, and thus became designated as his second piano concerto.
The Piano Concerto No. 24 in C minor, K. 491, is a concerto composed by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart for keyboard and orchestra. Mozart composed the concerto in the winter of 1785–1786, finishing it on 24 March 1786, three weeks after completing his Piano Concerto No. 23 in A major. As he intended to perform the work himself, Mozart did not write out the soloist's part in full. The premiere was in early April 1786 at the Burgtheater in Vienna. Chronologically, the work is the twentieth of Mozart's 23 original piano concertos.
The Violin Concerto No. 5 in A major, K. 219, often referred to by the nickname "Turkish", was written by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart in 1775, premiering during the Christmas season that year in Salzburg. It follows the typical fast-slow-fast musical structure.
The Kegelstatt Trio, K. 498, is a piano trio for clarinet, viola and piano in E-flat major by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.
The Piano Concerto No. 27 in B♭ major, K. 595, is Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's last piano concerto; it was first performed early in 1791, the year of his death.
The Piano Concerto No. 25 in C major, K. 503, was completed by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart on December 4, 1786, alongside the Prague Symphony, K. 504. Although two more concertos would later follow, this work is the last of what are considered the twelve great piano concertos written in Vienna between 1784 and 1786. Chronologically the work is the 21st of Mozart's 23 original piano concertos.
The Piano Concerto No. 22 in E♭ major, K. 482, is a work for piano, or fortepiano, and orchestra by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, composed in December 1785.
The Sonata in C major, K. 19d, is a work for piano four-hands once thought to be composed by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart in 1765 when he was nine years old in England. Composed in the traditional sonata form, it is one of the very few works thought to be written by Mozart for four-handed play.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's concertos for piano and orchestra are numbered from 1 to 27. The first four numbered concertos and three unnumbered concertos are early works that are arrangements of keyboard sonatas by various contemporary composers. Concertos 7 and 10 are compositions for three and two pianos respectively. The remaining twenty-one are original compositions for solo piano and orchestra. These works, many of which Mozart composed for himself to play in the Vienna concert series of 1784–86, held special importance for him.
The Piano Concerto No. 14 in E♭ major, K. 449, by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was written in 1784.
The Piano Concerto No. 15 in B♭ major, KV. 450 is a concertante work for piano and orchestra by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. The concerto is scored for solo piano, flute, two oboes, two bassoons, two horns, and strings. A brief section of the third movement is played by Mozart in a deleted scene from the movie Amadeus.
The Piano Concerto No. 16 in D major, K. 451, is a concertante work for piano, or pianoforte, and orchestra by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Mozart composed the concerto for performance at a series of concerts at the Vienna venues of the Trattnerhof and the Burgtheater in the first quarter of 1784, where he was himself the soloist. Mozart noted this concerto as complete on 22 March 1784 in his catalog, and performed the work later that month. Cliff Eisen has postulated that this performance was on 31 March 1784.
Scholars have long studied how Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart created his works. Nineteenth-century views on this topic were often based on a romantic, mythologizing conception of the process of composition. More recent scholarship addresses this issue by systematically examining authenticated letters and documents, and has arrived at rather different conclusions.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's Piano Sonata No. 6 in D major, K. 284 / 205b, (1775) is a sonata in three movements: