Sean McMeekin

Last updated

Sean McMeekin
Sean McMeekin NYMAS.jpg
Born
Sean McMeekin

(1974-05-10) May 10, 1974 (age 50)
NationalityAmerican
Alma mater Stanford University
OccupationHistorian
SpouseNesrin Ersoy McMeekin [1]

Sean McMeekin (born May 10, 1974) is an American historian, focused on European history of the early 20th century. His main research interests include modern German history, Russian history, communism, and the origins of the First and Second World Wars and the roles of Russia and the Ottoman Empire.

Contents

He has authored eight books, along with scholarly articles which have appeared in journals such as Contemporary European History, Common Knowledge, Current History, Historically Speaking, The World Today, and Communisme . He is currently Francis Flournoy Professor of European History and Culture at Bard College.

Early life and education

McMeekin grew up in Rochester, New York. He studied history at Stanford University (B.A. 1996) and the University of California, Berkeley (M.A. 1998 and PhD 2001). He held a Henry Chauncey Jr. '57 Postdoctoral Fellowship at Yale and was a fellow of the Remarque Institute at New York University.

Career

McMeekin taught in Turkey as an assistant professor in the Centre for Russian Studies at Bilkent University in Ankara, [2] then in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Koç University in Istanbul. He is now Francis Flournoy Professor of European History and Culture at Bard College in New York state.

Reception of published works

McMeekin's 2011 book The Russian Origins of the First World War was initially praised by the popular press as an insightful revisionist study for its use of Tsarist documents. [3] It was criticized by historians for its core theses, which advance a view of Russian involvement beyond what others have concluded. [4] [5] Because McMeekin was the first historian to publish questionable documents from the Tsarist archives suggesting Russian support for Armenian groups inside the Ottoman empire during the war, his treatment of the Armenian genocide has also been criticized, with one scholar pointing out that "The mass slaughter of Armenian civilians was in no way justified by the haphazard Russian support for Armenian paramilitary groups in Eastern Anatolia." [6] The Economist review noted, "if McMeekin's purpose was merely to exonerate all Ottoman behavior and play down Armenian suffering, he would not have included the observation of a Venezuelan soldier of fortune who saw on a mountainside 'thousands of half-nude and bleeding Armenian corpses, piled in heaps or interlaced in death's final embrace.'" [7]

McMeekin's 2013 book, July 1914: Countdown to War and his 2015 study, The Ottoman Endgame: War, Revolution, and the Making of the Modern Middle East were both well-received by the popular press. [8] [9]

His 2021 book, Stalin’s War, received positive reviews from National Review , [10] The Times , [11] and The Financial Times . [12] Historian Serhii Plokhy called it "...a revisionist take on the second world war ." [13] It also received positive reviews from Historians Simon Sebag Montefiore, Geoffrey Wawro, and Antony Beevor who called it "...both original and refreshing, written as it is with a wonderful clarity.". [14] The book got negative reviews from Lawrence Freedman in Foreign Affairs and others for being revisionist and even "distorted". [13] [15] [16] Similarly, historian Mark Edele noted that the book misquotes Stalin's speeches, and included sources refuted decades beforehand, or long ago shown to be fraudulent. Edele concluded:

"A gifted writer and a talented polemicist, he has lowered the historian’s craft to the level of propaganda. The result is a lamentable step back in our understanding of Stalin and his second world war." [17]

Nina L. Khrushcheva observed that "weighing in at some 800 pages, Stalin’s War compiles an impressive amount of historical information. But, given McMeekin’s procrustean framework, it comes across as cluelessly arrogant." [18]

Prizes

Selected works

Related Research Articles

In historiography, historical revisionism is the reinterpretation of a historical account. It usually involves challenging the orthodox scholarly views or narratives regarding a historical event, timespan, or phenomenon by introducing contrary evidence or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. Revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation as they come to light. The process of historical revision is a common, necessary, and usually uncontroversial process which develops and refines the historical record in order to make it more complete and accurate.

Historical negationism, also called historical denialism, is falsification or distortion of the historical record. This is not the same as historical revisionism, a broader term that extends to newly evidenced, fairly reasoned academic reinterpretations of history. In attempting to revise and influence the past, historical negationism acts as illegitimate historical revisionism by using techniques inadmissible in proper historical discourse, such as presenting known forged documents as genuine, inventing ingenious but implausible reasons for distrusting genuine documents, attributing conclusions to books and sources that report the opposite, manipulating statistical series to support the given point of view, and deliberately mistranslating traditional or modern texts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stalinism</span> Political and economic policies implemented by Joseph Stalin

Stalinism is the totalitarian means of governing and Marxist–Leninist policies implemented in the Soviet Union (USSR) from 1927 to 1953 by dictator Joseph Stalin and in Soviet satellite states between 1944 and 1953. Stalin had previously made a career as a gangster and robber, working to fund revolutionary activities, before eventually becoming General Secretary of the Soviet Union. Stalinism included the creation of a one man totalitarian police state, rapid industrialization, the theory of socialism in one country, forced collectivization of agriculture, intensification of class conflict, a cult of personality, and subordination of the interests of foreign communist parties to those of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, which Stalinism deemed the leading vanguard party of communist revolution at the time. After Stalin's death and the Khrushchev Thaw, a period of de-Stalinization began in the 1950s and 1960s, which caused the influence of Stalin's ideology to begin to wane in the USSR.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Totalitarianism</span> Extreme form of authoritarianism

Totalitarianism is a political system and a form of government that prohibits opposition political parties, disregards and outlaws the political claims of individual and group opposition to the state, and controls the public sphere and the private sphere of society. In the field of political science, totalitarianism is the extreme form of authoritarianism, wherein all socio-political power is held by a dictator, who also controls the national politics and the peoples of the nation with continual propaganda campaigns that are broadcast by state-controlled and by friendly private mass communications media.

Soviet and communist studies, or simply Soviet studies, is the field of regional and historical studies on the Soviet Union and other communist states, as well as the history of communism and of the communist parties that existed or still exist in some form in many countries, both inside and outside the former Eastern Bloc, such as the Communist Party USA. Aspects of its historiography have attracted debates between historians on several topics, including totalitarianism and Cold War espionage.

Kremlinology is the study and analysis of the politics and policies of the Soviet Union while Sovietology is the study of politics and policies of both the Soviet Union and former communist states more generally. These two terms were synonymous until the dissolution of the Soviet Union. In an extended usage, Kremlinology is sometimes used to mean any attempt to understand a secretive organization or process, such as plans for upcoming products or events, by interpreting indirect clues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Islamic Army of the Caucasus</span> Ottoman Imperial military unit in World War I

The Islamic Army of the Caucasus was a military unit of the Ottoman Empire formed on July 10, 1918. The Ottoman Minister of War, Enver Pasha, ordered its establishment, and it played a major role during the Caucasus Campaign of World War I.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Norman Naimark</span> American historian (born 1944)

Norman M. Naimark is an American historian. He is the Robert and Florence McDonnell Professor of Eastern European Studies at Stanford University, and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. He writes on modern Eastern European history, genocide, and ethnic cleansing in the region.

John Archibald Getty III is an American historian and professor at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), who specializes in the history of Russia and the history of the Soviet Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Bitlis</span>

The Battle of Bitlis refers to a series of engagements in the summer of 1916 for the town of Bitlis and to a lesser extent nearby Muş, between Russian Imperial forces and their Ottoman counterparts. The town was the last stronghold of the Ottoman Empire preventing the Russians from entering Anatolia and Mesopotamia. Part of the battle is known as Battle of Muş

<span class="mw-page-title-main">German Caucasus expedition</span> Expedition in the Caucasus by Germany

The German Caucasus expedition was a military expedition sent in late May 1918, by the German Empire to the formerly Russian Transcaucasia during the Caucasus Campaign of World War I. Its prime aim was to stabilize the pro-German Democratic Republic of Georgia and to secure oil supplies for Germany by preventing the Ottoman Empire from gaining access to the oil reserves near Baku on the Absheron Peninsula.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Historiography of the Cold War</span>

As soon as the term "Cold War" was popularized to refer to postwar tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, interpreting the course and origins of the conflict became a source of heated controversy among historians, political scientists and journalists. In particular, historians have sharply disagreed as to who was responsible for the breakdown of Soviet Union–United States relations after the World War II and whether the conflict between the two superpowers was inevitable, or could have been avoided. Historians have also disagreed on what exactly the Cold War was, what the sources of the conflict were and how to disentangle patterns of action and reaction between the two sides. While the explanations of the origins of the conflict in academic discussions are complex and diverse, several general schools of thought on the subject can be identified. Historians commonly speak of three differing approaches to the study of the Cold War: "orthodox" accounts, "revisionism" and "post-revisionism". However, much of the historiography on the Cold War weaves together two or even all three of these broad categories and more recent scholars have tended to address issues that transcend the concerns of all three schools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sheila Fitzpatrick</span> Australian historian

Sheila Mary Fitzpatrick is an Australian historian, whose main subjects are history of the Soviet Union and history of modern Russia, especially the Stalin era and the Great Purges, of which she proposes a "history from below", and is part of the "revisionist school" of Communist historiography. She has also critically reviewed the concept of totalitarianism and highlighted the differences between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in debates about comparison of Nazism and Stalinism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soviet offensive plans controversy</span> Late-20th-century debate on whether Stalin planned to invade Germany in 1941

The Soviet offensive plans controversy was a debate among historians in the late 20th and early 21st centuries as to whether Joseph Stalin had planned to launch an attack against Nazi Germany in the summer of 1941. The controversy began with Soviet defector Viktor Suvorov with his 1988 book Icebreaker: Who started the Second World War? In it, he claimed that Stalin used Nazi Germany as a proxy to attack Europe.

The Berlin-Baghdad Express: The Ottoman Empire and Germany’s Bid for World Power is a book by Sean McMeekin, first published in 2010. It looks at efforts made by Imperial Germany during the First World War to use its connections with the Muslim world to defeat the British Empire, including directing an Islamic jihad against it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black Sea raid</span> Ottoman naval sortie against Russian ports in WW1

The Black Sea raid was an Ottoman naval sortie against Russian ports in the Black Sea on 29 October 1914, supported by Germany, that led to the Ottoman entry into World War I. The attack was conceived by Ottoman War Minister Enver Pasha, German Admiral Wilhelm Souchon, and the German foreign ministry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian entry into World War I</span>

The Russian Empire's entry into World War I unfolded gradually in the days leading up to July 28, 1914. The sequence of events began with Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia, a Russian ally. In response, Russia issued an ultimatum to Vienna via Saint Petersburg, warning Austria-Hungary against attacking Serbia. As the conflict escalated with the invasion of Serbia, Russia commenced mobilizing its reserve army along the border of Austria-Hungary. Consequently, on July 31, Germany demanded that Russia demobilize. When Russia did not comply, Germany declared war on Russia on August 1, 1914. According to its war plan, Germany prioritized its offensive against France, declaring war on August 3. Germany deployed its main armies through Belgium with the aim of encircling Paris. The imminent threat to Belgium prompted Britain to declare war on Germany on August 4. The Ottoman Empire subsequently joined the Central Powers and engaged in warfare against Russia along their shared border.

Mark Edele is a historian who studies the Soviet Union. According to Karel C. Berkhoff, Edele is "a highly regarded specialist of the Soviet Union during World War II".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Russian Revolution: A New History</span> History of the Russian Revolution

The Russian Revolution: A New History is a political history of the Russian Revolution written by Sean McMeekin and published by Basic Books in 2017. The release was timed with the 100th anniversary of the Russian Revolution.

The Capture of Trabzon refers to the military operation carried out by the reorganized Ottoman Third Army, under the command of Wehip Pasha, which resulted in the seizure of Trabzon on February 24, 1918. This event took place during World War I.

References

  1. Finally, there is Nesrin Ersoy, the love of my life, without whom I could not have written this book. In Acknowledgements. From the book The Berlin-Baghdad Express. Sean McMeekin. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674058538-012
  2. "Staff". CRS. Bilkent University. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved February 28, 2021.
  3. Figes, Orlando (January 1, 2012). "The Russian Origins of the First World War by Sam McMeekin" . The Sunday Times . ISSN   0140-0460. Archived from the original on May 31, 2021. Retrieved February 25, 2021.
  4. Bobroff, Ronald P. (June 1, 2013). "The Russian Origins of the First World War" . Revolutionary Russia. 26 (1): 82–84. doi:10.1080/09546545.2013.780778. ISSN   0954-6545. S2CID   143759175 via Taylor & Francis Online.
  5. Rendle, Matthew (September 2, 2014). "The Russian origins of the First World War" . First World War Studies. 5 (3): 340–342. doi:10.1080/19475020.2014.969896. ISSN   1947-5020. S2CID   162211839 via Taylor & Francis Online.
  6. Sanborn, Joshua (2012). "Sean McMeekin. The Russian Origins of the First World War" . The American Historical Review . 117 (4): 1329–1330. doi:10.1093/ahr/117.4.1329 via Oxford Academic.
  7. "All the world's a stage". The Economist . October 29, 2015. ISSN   0013-0613. Archived from the original on May 31, 2021. Retrieved February 25, 2021.
  8. Evans, R. J. W. (February 6, 2014). "'The Greatest Catastrophe the World Has Seen'" . The New York Review . ISSN   0028-7504. Archived from the original on May 8, 2021. Retrieved February 25, 2021.
  9. de Bellaigue, Christopher (December 18, 2015). "The Ottoman Endgame by Sean McMeekin review – the breakup of an empire". The Guardian . Archived from the original on May 31, 2021. Retrieved February 28, 2021.
  10. "The War Stalin Wanted". National Review. May 27, 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2021.
  11. Aaronovitch, David. "Stalin's War by Sean McMeekin review — the Second World War was caused by Stalin. Discuss". The Times . ISSN   0140-0460 . Retrieved December 16, 2021.
  12. MacMillan, Margaret (March 24, 2021). "Stalin's War by Sean McMeekin — alternative perspectives". Financial Times. Retrieved December 16, 2021.
  13. 1 2 Plokhy, Serhii (April 6, 2021). "Stalin's War by Sean McMeekin review – a revisionist take on the second world war". The Guardian.
  14. McMeekin, Sean (December 30, 2023). Stalin's War: A New History of World War II. Basic Books. ISBN   978-1541672796.
  15. Freedman, Lawrence D. (August 24, 2021). "Stalin's War: A New History of World War II". Foreign Affairs. ISSN   0015-7120 . Retrieved December 16, 2021.
  16. Roberts, Geoffrey (May 8, 2021). "Stalin's War: Distorted history of a complex second World War". The Irish Times. Retrieved July 16, 2021.
  17. Edele, Mark (May 25, 2021). "Better to lose Australia". Inside Story. Archived from the original on May 31, 2021. Retrieved May 26, 2021.
  18. Khrushcheva, Nina L. (May 7, 2021). "Stalin's War and Peace". Project Syndicate. Retrieved December 16, 2021.