Section 16 of the Constitution Act, 1867

Last updated

Royal Proclamation which brought the Act into force on July 1, 1867 Proclamation Canadian Confederation.jpg
Royal Proclamation which brought the Act into force on July 1, 1867

Section 16 of the Constitution Act, 1867 (French : article 16 de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867) is a provision of the Constitution of Canada, making Ottawa the seat of government of Canada.

Contents

The Constitution Act, 1867 is the constitutional statute which established Canada. Originally named the British North America Act, 1867 , the Act continues to be the foundational statute for the Constitution of Canada, although it has been amended many times since 1867. It is now recognised as part of the supreme law of Canada.

Constitution Act, 1867

The Constitution Act, 1867 is part of the Constitution of Canada and thus part of the supreme law of Canada. [1] [2] The Act sets out the constitutional framework of Canada, including the structure of the federal government and the powers of the federal government and the provinces. It was the product of extensive negotiations between the provinces of British North America at the Charlottetown Conference in 1864, the Quebec Conference in 1864, and the London Conference in 1866. [3] [4] Those conferences were followed by consultations with the British government in 1867. [3] [5] The Act was then enacted in 1867 by the British Parliament under the name the British North America Act, 1867. [6] [7] In 1982 the Act was brought under full Canadian control through the Patriation of the Constitution, and was renamed the Constitution Act, 1867 . [2] [6] Since Patriation the Act can only be amended in Canada, under the amending formula set out in the Constitution Act, 1982 . [8] [9] [10]

Text of section 16

Section 16 reads:

Seat of Government of Canada
16 Until the Queen otherwise directs, the Seat of Government of Canada shall be Ottawa. [11]

Section 16 is found in Part III of the Constitution Act, 1867, dealing with the executive power of the federal government.

Legislative history

One issue which needed to be addressed for the new country was the location of the seat of government. Both the Quebec Resolutions and the London Resolutions provided that the seat of government should be Ottawa, but stated that the designation of the seat of government was "subject to the Royal Prerogative". [12] [13]

During the drafting of the bill, this provision first appeared in the fourth draft, which continued to refer to the royal prerogative. The section took its current wording in the final draft of the bill, which gave the Queen the statutory power to direct a different location, rather than citing the royal prerogative. [14]

Section 16 has not been amended since the Act was enacted in 1867. [11]

Purpose and interpretation

Previous dispute about the seat of government

Bytown (now Ottawa) in 1853, showing the future site of the Parliament of Canada on what is now Parliament Hill Bytown in 1853.jpg
Bytown (now Ottawa) in 1853, showing the future site of the Parliament of Canada on what is now Parliament Hill

The choice of a seat of government had been a major political issue in the Province of Canada, resulting in an itinerant parliament over the course of twenty-five years, a referral of the issue to Queen Victoria, and the fall of the Canadian government in 1858. [15]

From 1841 to 1866, the seat of government of the Province of Canada had relocated seven times, to five different cities: Kingston (1841 to 1843); Montreal (1843 to 1849); Toronto (1850 to 1851); Quebec City (1852 to 1854); Toronto again (1855 to 1859); Quebec City again (1860 to 1865), and finally Ottawa (1866). Each of these relocations had triggered significant political debates, as there were strong regional feelings concerning the location of the seat of government. [15] [16]

Decision deferred to Queen Victoria

John A. Macdonald, who deferred the decision to Queen Victoria John A Macdonald in 1858.jpg
John A. Macdonald, who deferred the decision to Queen Victoria
George-Etienne Cartier, who also deferred the decision to the Queen George-Etienne Cartier 01.jpg
George-Étienne Cartier, who also deferred the decision to the Queen

In 1857, the issue came up again in the Parliament of the Province of Canada. John A. Macdonald, the leader of the Liberal-Conservatives from Canada West (now Ontario), and George-Étienne Cartier, the leader of the conservative Bleus from Canada East (now Quebec), were convinced that the issue of the seat of government had to be removed from Canadian politics to keep the Province of Canada together, so strong were the regional loyalties. Even their own Cabinet was divided on the issue, as Macdonald admitted in the Legislative Assembly. [17] [18]

To resolve the impasse, Macdonald and Cartier proposed that Queen Victoria be asked to determine the location of the seat of government. That proposal passed in the Legislative Assembly, but was controversial. The Globe newspaper in Toronto, published by one of the leading Reform party members, George Brown, condemned the decision, saying that it amounted to a vote "to destroy responsible government by sending to Downing Street for Mr Labouchere [the Colonial Secretary] to fix the seat of government." For a short time, however, this approach removed the seat-of-government issue from Canadian politics. [17] [18] [19] [20]

The Queen chooses Ottawa, 1857

Governor General Sir Edmund Head, who supported Ottawa as the seat of government Edmund Walker Head.jpg
Governor General Sir Edmund Head, who supported Ottawa as the seat of government
Queen Victoria, who chose Ottawa Franz Xaver Winterhalter Queen Victoria.jpg
Queen Victoria, who chose Ottawa

After the passage of the resolution by the Assembly, the Governor General, Sir Edmund Head, prepared a confidential memorandum, considering the claims of each of the cities to be named as the seat of government. He recommended that Ottawa be chosen, in part because of its location on the boundary between Canada East and Canada West, which he thought would satisfy some of the regional tensions. He also relied on a military consideration: Ottawa was located a considerable distance from the United States, unlike Toronto, Kingston and Montreal. [21] [22]

Head then went to London to explain his recommendation to the British government. The Colonial Secretary, Henry Labouchere, agreed with Head's position and recommended Ottawa to Queen Victoria. The Prince Consort, Prince Albert, also favoured Ottawa. Late in 1857, the Queen made her decision, in favour of Ottawa. [16] [17] [19] [21]

Fall of the Canadian government, 1858

A. A. Dorion, who opposed the Queen's choice of Ottawa Antoine-Aime Dorion.jpg
A. A. Dorion, who opposed the Queen's choice of Ottawa
George Brown, who briefly formed a government with Dorion after the government fell over the seat of government issue Brown-sm.jpg
George Brown, who briefly formed a government with Dorion after the government fell over the seat of government issue

The Queen's choice did not end the dispute, and gave rise to a complicated political episode, the Double Shuffle. In the parliamentary session in 1858, the Macdonald–Cartier government introduced a motion to authorise funding to build parliament buildings at Ottawa. The opposition, led by Antoine-Aimé Dorion and George Brown, opposed the proposal, and the government was defeated in the Assembly on the issue. The Macdonald–Cartier government treated the defeat as a matter of confidence and resigned. Brown and Dorion formed a government, but within a few days, they too were defeated and also had to resign. In the interval, Macdonald and Cartier were able to find support in the Assembly and were reappointed by Governor General Head. [23] [24]

The next year, 1859, the Cartier–Macdonald government returned to the issue. This time, after a bitter debate lasting two weeks, they were able to carry the motion for the construction of the new parliament buildings in Ottawa, in an exchange for a commitment that the Parliament would sit at Quebec City until the new buildings were ready in Ottawa. Even that was not the end of the debate. There was one final attempt in the parliamentary session of 1860 to re-open the question, but this time it was defeated by a strong majority in the Assembly. [23]

Construction of Parliament buildings

Original Centre Block, destroyed in a fire in 1916 Original Canadian parliament.jpg
Original Centre Block, destroyed in a fire in 1916

Construction of the new parliament buildings began in 1860. Progress was initially fast, but the construction was temporarily halted in 1862 because of large cost overruns. A public inquiry was held, which found various faults with the construction process, but recommended that the original architects and builders be allowed to continue the project. By the time the buildings were completed in 1865, the total cost was $2,591,760, a considerable cost overrun from the original budget of £225,000 (equivalent to $1,094,985 at the statutory conversion rate then in use). [16] [25]

The last session of the Parliament of the Province of Canada was held in Ottawa in 1866. [26] [27]

Fathers of Confederation choose Ottawa

Governor General Lord Monck, who thought the choice of Ottawa was "an act of insanity" Charles Stanley Monck.png
Governor General Lord Monck, who thought the choice of Ottawa was "an act of insanity"

With that history of political conflict, and the cost of the new Parliament buildings, it was not surprising that the delegates to the Quebec Conference agreed on Ottawa as the seat of government. [28] On October 26, 1864, Macdonald proposed to the Conference that Ottawa be the seat of government, "subject to the royal prerogative". The motion passed unanimously. [29]

There are some indications that behind the scenes, the issue was not yet firmly settled. [28] On his return from the London Conference, Macdonald stated publicly that "he had some doubts before going to England as to whether the seat of government for the Dominion would remain in Ottawa, but he was now happy to say there was no question Ottawa was confirmed as the capital of the new Dominion." [30] The Governor General, Lord Monck, was privately grumbling over the choice of Ottawa. In a confidential letter to the Colonial Secretary, he stated that the choice of Ottawa "...seems like an act of insanity." He predicted that within four years the seat of government would move, likely to Quebec City. [31]

Although the monarch retains the power to move the seat of government under section 16, there has not been any such proposal since the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1867. [22]

Provincial jurisdiction over Ottawa

The Parliament Buildings at dawn Dawn at Ottawa's Parliament Hill.jpg
The Parliament Buildings at dawn

Unlike other federations, Canada does not have a specially designated capital area under the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government. Municipalities are under provincial jurisdiction, through section 92(8) of the Act. The city of Ottawa is in the province of Ontario and is incorporated under Ontario law. [32] [33] The federal government also has a considerable presence in the office towers of the city of Gatineau, located across the Ottawa River, but Gatineau is in the province of Quebec and is incorporated under Quebec law. [34] [35]

There is no equivalent to the District of Columbia in the United States, nor the Australian Capital Territory in Australia. [36] One Father of Confederation, John Hamilton Gray of New Brunswick, while praising the choice of Ottawa, stated that the lack of a federal district under the control of Parliament was a mistake. [37]

The federal Parliament has passed a statute to create the National Capital Commission, but that federal legislation does not oust Ontario jurisdiction over Ottawa, nor Quebec jurisdiction over Gatineau. [32] [38] [39] The Supreme Court of Canada has held that the federal Parliament has some legislative jurisdiction over the area around the seat of government, but the extent of that power is not clear. [36] [40]

The mixture of federal, provincial and municipal jurisdiction over Ottawa and Gatineau became an issue during the Canada convoy protest in 2022. The commissioner appointed to review the use of the Emergencies Act by the federal government commented on the overlapping jurisdiction, and stated that it may have contributed to the slow response to the protests. [41]

Section 68 of the Act defines the seats of government of the four original provinces of Canada: Toronto for Ontario; Quebec City for Quebec; Fredericton for New Brunswick; and Halifax for Nova Scotia.

Section 92(8) of the Act provides that the provinces have exclusive jurisdiction over municipalities.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Canada</span>

The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law in Canada. It outlines Canada's system of government and the civil and human rights of those who are citizens of Canada and non-citizens in Canada. Its contents are an amalgamation of various codified acts, treaties between the Crown and Indigenous Peoples, uncodified traditions and conventions. Canada is one of the oldest constitutional monarchies in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian Confederation</span> 1867 unification of Province of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick

Canadian Confederation was the process by which three British North American provinces—the Province of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick—were united into one federation, called the Dominion of Canada, on July 1, 1867. This process occurred in accordance with the rising tide of Canadian nationalism that was then beginning to swell within these provinces and others. Upon Confederation, Canada consisted of four provinces: Ontario and Quebec, which had been split out from the Province of Canada, and the provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The province of Prince Edward Island, which had hosted the first meeting to consider Confederation, the Charlottetown Conference, did not join Confederation until 1873. Over the years since Confederation, Canada has seen numerous territorial changes and expansions, resulting in the current number of ten provinces and three territories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George-Étienne Cartier</span> Canadian statesman (1814–1873)

Sir George-Étienne Cartier, 1st Baronet, was a Canadian statesman and Father of Confederation. The English spelling of the name—George, instead of Georges, the usual French spelling—is explained by his having been named in honour of King George III.

Canadian federalism involves the current nature and historical development of the federal system in Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quebec Conference, 1864</span> Conference on Canadian confederation

The Quebec Conference was held from October 10 to 24, 1864, to discuss a proposed Canadian confederation. It was in response to the shift in political ground when the United Kingdom and the United States had come very close to engaging in war with each other. Therefore, the overall goal of the conference was to elaborate on policies surrounding federalism and creating a single state, both of which had been discussed at the Charlottetown Conference around a month earlier. Canada West leader John A. Macdonald requested Governor-General Charles Monck to invite all representatives from the three Maritime provinces and Newfoundland to meet with the candidates who formed the United Canada to Quebec in October 1864. Although Newfoundland sent two observers, it did not participate directly in the proceedings.

The Constitution Act, 1982 is a part of the Constitution of Canada. The Act was introduced as part of Canada's process of patriating the constitution, introducing several amendments to the British North America Act, 1867, including re-naming it the Constitution Act, 1867. In addition to patriating the Constitution, the Constitution Act, 1982 enacted the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; guaranteed rights of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada; entrenched provincial jurisdiction over natural resources; provided for future constitutional conferences; and set out the procedures for amending the Constitution in the future.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">London Conference of 1866</span> Final conference leading to Confederation of Canada

The London Conference was held in London, in the United Kingdom, in 1866. It was the third and final in a series of conferences that led to Canadian Confederation in 1867. Sixteen delegates from the Province of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick gathered to set out the final outline of the proposed Canadian Confederation, resulting in the British North America Act, 1867.

<i>Constitution Act, 1867</i> Primary constitutional document of Canada

The Constitution Act, 1867, originally enacted as the British North America Act, 1867, is a major part of the Constitution of Canada. The act created a federal dominion and defines much of the operation of the Government of Canada, including its federal structure, the House of Commons, the Senate, the justice system, and the taxation system. In 1982, with the patriation of the Constitution, the British North America Acts which were originally enacted by the British Parliament, including this Act, were renamed. However, the acts are still known by their original names in records of the United Kingdom. Amendments were also made at this time: section 92A was added, giving provinces greater control over non-renewable natural resources.

Before 1982, modifying the Constitution of Canada primarily meant amending the British North America Act, 1867. Unlike most other constitutions, however, the Act had no amending formula; instead, changes were enacted through Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom called the British North America Acts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Dewey Day</span> Canadian lawyer, politician and judge (1806–1884)

Charles Dewey Day, was a lawyer, political figure, and judges in Lower Canada and Canada East. He was a member of the Special Council of Lower Canada, which governed Lower Canada after the Lower Canada Rebellions in 1837 and 1838. He was elected to the first Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada in 1841, but resigned in 1842 to accept an appointment to the Court of Queen's Bench of Lower Canada.

<i>Cushing v Dupuy</i> Canadian insolvency law case in the JCPC

Cushing v Dupuy is a Canadian constitutional law case decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in 1880, at that time the highest court of appeal for the British Empire, including Canada. The case was on appeal from the Quebec Court of Queen's Bench, and dealt with the following issues:

Disallowance and reservation are historical constitutional powers in Canada that act as a mechanism to delay or overrule legislation passed by Parliament or a provincial legislature. In contemporary Canadian history, disallowance is an authority granted to the governor general in council to invalidate an act passed by a provincial legislature. Reservation is an authority granted to the lieutenant governor to withhold royal assent from a bill which has been passed by a provincial legislature; the bill is then "reserved" for consideration by the federal cabinet.

Section 3 of the <i>Constitution Act, 1867</i> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 3 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision of the Constitution of Canada relating to the union of the original three provinces into Canada. Under the authority of this section, Queen Victoria issued the Proclamation of the Constitution Act, 1867, which brought the Act into force on July 1, 1867, creating Canada.

Section 9 of the <i>Constitution Act, 1867</i> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 9 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision of the Constitution of Canada which vests the executive power in the monarch.

Section 17 of the <i>Constitution Act, 1867</i> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 17 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is the provision of the Constitution of Canada which created the federal Parliament of Canada. The Parliament is composed of the King of Canada; the appointed upper house, the Senate of Canada; and the elected lower house, the House of Commons of Canada. Political power rests mainly with the elected House of Commons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 58 of the Constitution Act, 1867</span> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 58 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision of the Constitution of Canada creating the office of provincial lieutenant governors, and providing for appointment by the Governor General of Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 25 of the Constitution Act, 1867</span> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 25 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a repealed provision of the Constitution of Canada relating to the appointment of the first members of the Senate of Canada in 1867.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 145 of the Constitution Act, 1867</span> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 145 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a repealed provision of the Constitution of Canada which required the federal government to build a railway connecting the River St. Lawrence with Halifax, Nova Scotia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 146 of the Constitution Act, 1867</span> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 146 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision of the Constitution of Canada authorising the expansion of Canada by admitting British Columbia, Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, Rupert's Land, and the North-Western Territory into Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Double Shuffle (Canadian political episode)</span> Cabinet shuffles in Province of Canada 1858

The Double Shuffle was a political episode in the Province of Canada in 1858. It began on July 28, 1858, when the coalition government of John A. Macdonald (Liberal-Conservative) and George-Étienne Cartier (Bleu) was defeated on a confidence vote in the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada, concerning the location of the seat of government for the province. The government resigned the next day.

References

  1. Peter Hogg and Wade Wright, Constitutional Law of Canada, 5th ed. (Toronto: Thomson Reuters (looseleaf; current to 2022), para. 1:4.
  2. 1 2 Constitution Act, 1982, s. 52, s. 53, and Schedule, item 1.
  3. 1 2 Donald Creighton, The Road to Confederation (Toronto: Macmillan Publishing, 1964; revised ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012) online.
  4. Christopher Moore, 1867 — How the Fathers Made a Deal (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1997).
  5. Ben Gilding, "The Silent Framers of British North American Union: The Colonial Office and Canadian Confederation, 1851–67", Canadian Historical Review, Vol. 99, No. 3 (2018), pp. 349–393.
  6. 1 2 Hogg and Wright, Constitutional Law of Canada, para. 1:2.
  7. British North America Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Vict. (UK), c. 3.]
  8. Hogg and Wright, Constitutional Law of Canada, para. 4:1.
  9. Constitution Act, 1982, Part V.
  10. Canada Act 1982 (UK) 1982, c. 11, s. 2.
  11. 1 2 Constitution Act, 1867, s. 16.
  12. Quebec Resolutions, 1864, Resolution 52.
  13. London Resolutions, 1866, Resolution 51.
  14. G.P. Browne (ed.), Documents on the Confederation of British North America (Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2009; reprint of 1969 edition, with introduction by Janet Ajzenstat), "Fourth Draft of the British North America Bill" (undated), clause 5 (Document 85, p. 282); "Final Draft of the British North America Bill" (February 9, 1867), clause 16 (Document 86, p. 305).
  15. 1 2 Wilfrid Eggleston, The Queen's Choice: A Story of Canada's Capital (Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1961), pp. 98–110.
  16. 1 2 3 "Ottawa Becomes the Capital" (Ottawa: Ottawa Archives, 2007), p. 3.
  17. 1 2 3 W.L. Morton, The Critical Years: The Union of British North America 1857–1873 (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1964), pp. 13–14.
  18. 1 2 Eggleston, The Queen's Choice, pp. 100–101.
  19. 1 2 J.M.S. Careless, The Union of the Canadas: The Growth of Canadian Institutions 1841—1857 (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1967), pp. 206–207.
  20. Journals of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada, 3rd Session, 5th Provincial Parliament of Canada, 1857, pp. 130–133.
  21. 1 2 Eggleston, The Queen's Choice, pp. 102–108.
  22. 1 2 James A. Gibson, "Sir Edmund Head's Memorandum on the Choice of Ottawa as the Seat of Government of Canada", Canadian Historical Review (1935), vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 411–417. [Article starts at fifth page of linked document.]
  23. 1 2 Eggleston, The Queen's Choice, pp. 108–110.
  24. Morton, The Critical Years, p. 17–19.
  25. James Powell, A History of the Canadian Dollar (Ottawa: Bank of Canada, 2005), p. 23.
  26. "Ottawa Becomes the Capital", p. 56.
  27. Morton, The Critical Years, p. 197.
  28. 1 2 Eggleston, The Queen's Choice, pp. 98–99.
  29. Browne (ed.), Documents on the Confederation of British North America, "Hewitt Bernard's Minutes of the Quebec Conference", October 26, 1864 (Document 31, p. 88).
  30. Eggleston, The Queen's Choice, p. 137.
  31. Eggleston, The Queen's Choice, pp. 99, 137.
  32. 1 2 Eggleston, The Queen's Choice, pp. 181, 249.
  33. City of Ottawa Act, 1999 , SO 1999, c. 14, Sch. E.
  34. Eggleston, The Queen's Choice, pp. 181, 211–212.
  35. Charter of Ville de Gatineau , CSRQ , c. 11.1.
  36. 1 2 W.H. McConnell, Commentary on the British North America Act (Toronto: MacMillan Co. of Canada, 1977), pp. 52–55.
  37. Eggleton, The Queen's Choice, pp. 144–146.
  38. Eggleston, The Queen's Choice, pp. 278–279.
  39. National Capital Act , RSC 1985, c. N-4.
  40. Munro v. National Capital Commission, [1966] SCR 663.
  41. The Honourable Paul S. Rouleau, Commissioner, Report of the Public Inquiry into the 2022 Public Order Emergency, (Ottawa: His Majesty the King, 2023), vol. 1 (executive summary), pp. 40–41, 174–175.