Sight word

Last updated

High-frequency sight words (also known as sight words) are commonly used words that young children are encouraged to memorize as a whole by sight so that they can automatically recognize these words in print without having to use any strategies to decode. [1] Sight words were introduced after whole language (a similar method) fell out of favor with the education establishment. [2]

Contents

The term sight words are often confused with sight vocabulary, which is defined as each person's vocabulary that the person recognizes from memory without the need to decode for understanding. [3] [1]

However, some researchers[ who? ] state that two major concerns with sight words are:

(1) memorizing sight words is labour intensive, requiring around 35 trials per word, [4] and

(2) teachers who focus solely on teaching sight words while neglecting phonics instruction are making it harder for children to "gain basic word-recognition skills" that are critically needed by the end of the third grade and important to be used over a lifetime of reading. [5]

Rationale

Recognizing sight words automatically account for a large percentage (up to 75%) of the words used in beginning children's print materials. [6] [7] The advantage of children being able to recognize sight words automatically is that the child will be able to identify the majority of words in a beginning text before they even attempt to read it; therefore, allowing the child to concentrate on understanding the meaning as they read without having to stop and decode every single word. [6] Advocates of whole-word instruction believe that being able to recognize numerous sight words gives students a better start to learning to read.

Automatically, recognizing sight words is said to be beneficial for beginning readers because many of these words have unusual spelling patterns and cannot be sounded out using basic phonics knowledge and also lack visual representation. [8] For example, the word "was" does not follow a usual spelling pattern, as the middle letter "a" makes an /ɒ~ʌ/ sound and the final letter "s" makes a /z/ sound, nor can the word be associated with a picture clue since it denotes an abstract state (existence). Another example is the word "said", It breaks the phonetic rule that ai normally makes the long a sound, ay. In this word, it makes the short e sound of eh. [9] The word "said" is pronounced as /s/ /e/ /d/, the word "has" also breaks the phonetic rule of s normally making the sss sound. In this word, the s makes the z sound, /z/" and the word is then pronounced /h/ /a/ /z/. [9]

However, a 2017 study in England compared teaching with phonics to teaching whole written words and concluded that phonics is a more effective approach, saying "our findings suggest that interventions aiming to improve the accuracy of reading aloud and/or comprehension in the early stages of learning should focus on the relationships present in print-to-sound relationships, rather than attempting to teach the meanings of whole written words". [10]

Most advocates of sight-words believe children should memorize the words. However, some educators suggested that a more efficient method is to teach them by using an explicit phonics approach, perhaps by using a tool such as Elkonin boxes. As a result, the words form part of the students sight vocabulary and are readily accessible and aid in learning other words containing similar sounds. [11] [12]

Other phonics advocates such as the Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI-USA), the Departments of Education in England, and the State of Victoria in Australia, recommend that teachers first begin by teaching children the frequent sounds and the simple spellings, then introduce the less frequent sounds and more complex spellings later (e.g. the sounds /s/ and /t/ before /v/ and /w/; and the spellings cake before eight and cat before duck). [13] [14] [15] [16] The following are samples of the lists that are available on the CCSSI-USA site: [17]

PhonemeSample only - Word Examples (Consonants) (CCSSI-USA)Common Graphemes (Spellings)
/m/mitt, comb, hymnm, mb, mn
/t/tickle, mitt, sippedt, tt, ed
/n/nice, knight, gnatn, kn, gn
/k/cup, kite, duck, chorus, folk, quietk, c, ck, ch, lk, q
/f/fluff, sphere, tough, calff, ff, gh, ph, lf
/s/sit, pass, science, psychics, ss, sc, ps
/z/zoo, jazz, nose, as, xylophonez, zz, se, s, x
/sh/shoe, mission, sure, charade, precious, notion, mission, specialsh, ss, s, ch, sc, ti, si, ci
/zh/measure, azures, z
/r/reach, wrap, her, fur, stirr, wr, er/ur/ir
/h/house, wholeh, wh
PhonemeSample only - Word Examples (Vowels) (CCSSI-USA)Common Graphemes (Spellings)
/ā/make, rain, play, great, baby, eight, vein, theya_e, ai, ay, ea, -y, eigh, ei, ey
/ē/see, these, me, eat, key, happy, chief, eitheree, e_e, -e, ea, ey, -y, ie, ei
/ī/time, pie, cry, right, riflei_e, ie, -y, igh, -I
/ō/vote, boat, toe, snow, openo_e, oa, oe, ow, o-
/ū/use, few, cuteu, ew, u_e
/ă/cata
/ĕ/bed, breathe, ea
/ĭ/sit, gymi, y
/ŏ/fox, swap, palmo, (w)a, al
/ŭ/cup, cover, flood, toughu, o, oo, ou
/aw/saw, pause, call, water, boughtaw, au, al, (w)a, ough
/er/her, fur, sirer, ur, ir

Word lists

A number of sight word lists have been compiled and published; among the most popular are the Dolch sight words [18] (first published in 1936) and the 1000 Instant Word list prepared in 1979 by Edward Fry, professor of Education, and Director of the Reading Center at Rutgers University and Loyola University in Los Angeles. [19] [20] [21] [22] Many commercial products are also available. These lists have similar attributes as they all aim to divide words into levels which are prioritized and introduced to children according to frequency of appearance in beginning readers' texts. Although, many of the lists have overlapping content, the order of frequency of sight words varies and can be disputed as they depend on contexts such as geographical location, empirical data, samples used, and year of publication. [23]

Criticism

Research indicates that the alphabetic principle is considered “the primary driver” of development of all aspects of printed word recognition including phonic rules and sight vocabulary." [24] In addition, the use of sight words as a reading instructional strategy is inconsistent with the dual route theory as it involves an out-of-context memorization rather than the developing phonological skills. [25] Instead, it is suggested that children must first learn to identify individual letter-sound correspondences before blending and segmenting letter combinations. [26] [27]

Proponents of systematic phonics and synthetic phonics argue that children must first learn to associate the sounds of their language with the letter(s) that are used to represent them, to blend those sounds into words, and that children should never memorize words as visual designs. [28] Using sight words as a method of teaching reading in English is considered as being at odds with the alphabetic principle and treating English as though it were a logographic language (e.g. Chinese or Japanese). [29]

Some notable researchers have clearly stated their disapproval of whole language and whole-word teaching. In his 2009 book, Reading in the brain, French cognitive neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene wrote, "cognitive psychology directly refutes any notion of teaching via a 'global' or 'whole language' method.” He goes on to talk about "the myth of whole-word reading", saying it has been refuted by recent experiments. "We do not recognize a printed word through a holistic grasping of its contours because our brain breaks it down into letters and graphemes." [30] Another cognitive neuroscientist Mark Seidenberg, says that learning to sound-out typical words such as have (/h/-/a/-/v/) helps the student to read other words such as had, has, having, hive, haven't, etc. because of the sounds they have in common. [31]

See also

Related Research Articles

Whole language is a philosophy of reading and a discredited educational method originally developed for teaching literacy in English to young children. The method became a major model for education in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and the UK in the 1980s and 1990s, despite there being no scientific support for the method's effectiveness. It is based on the premise that learning to read English comes naturally to humans, especially young children, in the same way that learning to speak develops naturally.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phonics</span> Method of teaching reading and writing

Phonics is a method for teaching reading and writing to beginners. To use phonics is to teach the relationship between the sounds of the spoken language (phonemes), and the letters (graphemes) or groups of letters or syllables of the written language. Phonics is also known as the alphabetic principle or the alphabetic code. It can be used with any writing system that is alphabetic, such as that of English, Russian, and most other languages. Phonics is also sometimes used as part of the process of teaching Chinese people to read and write Chinese characters, which are not alphabetic, using pinyin, which is alphabetic.

A vocabulary is a set of words, typically the set in a language or the set known to an individual. The word vocabulary originated from the Latin vocabulum, meaning "a word, name". It forms an essential component of language and communication, helping convey thoughts, ideas, emotions, and information. Vocabulary can be oral, written, or signed and can be categorized into two main types: active vocabulary and passive vocabulary. An individual's vocabulary continually evolves through various methods, including direct instruction, independent reading, and natural language exposure, but it can also shrink due to forgetting, trauma, or disease. Furthermore, vocabulary is a significant focus of study across various disciplines, like linguistics, education, psychology, and artificial intelligence. Vocabulary is not limited to single words; it also encompasses multi-word units known as collocations, idioms, and other types of phraseology. Acquiring an adequate vocabulary is one of the largest challenges in learning a second language.

Reading for special needs has become an area of interest as the understanding of reading has improved. Teaching children with special needs how to read was not historically pursued due to perspectives of a Reading Readiness model. This model assumes that a reader must learn to read in a hierarchical manner such that one skill must be mastered before learning the next skill. This approach often led to teaching sub-skills of reading in a decontextualized manner. This style of teaching made it difficult for children to master these early skills, and as a result, did not advance to more advanced literacy instruction and often continued to receive age-inappropriate instruction.

Reading readiness has been defined as the point at which a person is ready to learn to read and the time during which a person transitions from being a non-reader into a reader. Other terms for reading readiness include early literacy and emergent reading.

The National Reading Panel (NRP) was a United States government body formed in 1997 at the request of Congress, it was a national panel with the aim of assessing the effectiveness of different approaches used to teach children to read.

Phonological awareness is an individual's awareness of the phonological structure, or sound structure, of words. Phonological awareness is an important and reliable predictor of later reading ability and has, therefore, been the focus of much research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Synthetic phonics</span> Teaching reading by blending and segmenting the sounds of the letters

Synthetic phonics, also known as blended phonics or inductive phonics, is a method of teaching English reading which first teaches the letter sounds and then builds up to blending these sounds together to achieve full pronunciation of whole words.

Inventive spelling is the use of unconventional spellings of words.

Decodable text is a type of text often used in beginning reading instruction. Decodable texts are carefully sequenced to progressively incorporate words that are consistent with the letters and corresponding phonemes that have been taught to the new reader. Therefore, with this type of text new readers can decipher words using the phonics skills they have been taught. For instance, children could decode a phrase such as “Pat the fat rat” if they had been taught the letter-sound associations for each letter—that 'p' stands for the sound /p/, 'a' for the sound /a/, etc.

According to the alphabetic principle, letters and combinations of letters are the symbols used to represent the speech sounds of a language based on systematic and predictable relationships between written letters, symbols, and spoken words. The alphabetic principle is the foundation of any alphabetic writing system. In the education field, it is known as the alphabetic code.

The Dolch word list is a list of frequently used English words, compiled by Edward William Dolch, a major proponent of the "whole-word" method of beginning reading instruction. The list was first published in a journal article in 1936 and then published in his book Problems in Reading in 1948.

Diane McGuinness is a cognitive psychologist who has written extensively on sex differences, education, learning disabilities, and early reading instruction. She currently holds the title of Emeritus Professor of Psychology at the University of South Florida.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Management of dyslexia</span>

Management of dyslexia depends on a multitude of variables; there is no one specific strategy or set of strategies that will work for all who have dyslexia.

Balanced literacy is a theory of teaching reading and writing the English language that arose in the 1990s and has a variety of interpretations. For some, balanced literacy strikes a balance between whole language and phonics and puts an end to the so called reading wars. Others say balanced literacy, in practice, usually means the whole language approach to reading.

Analytic phonics refers to a very common approach to the teaching of reading that starts at the word level, not at the sound (phoneme) level. It does not teach the blending of sounds together as is done in synthetic phonics. One method is to have students identify a common sound in a set of words that each contain that same sound. For example, the teacher and student discuss how the following words are alike: pat, park, push and pen. Analytic phonics is often taught together with levelled-reading books, look-say practice, and the use of aids such as phonics worksheets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reading</span> Taking in the meaning of letters or symbols

Reading is the process of taking in the sense or meaning of letters, symbols, etc., especially by sight or touch.

Emergent literacy is a term that is used to explain a child's knowledge of reading and writing skills before they learn how to read and write words. It signals a belief that, in literate society, young children—even one- and two-year-olds—are in the process of becoming literate. Through the support of parents, caregivers, and educators, a child can successfully progress from emergent to conventional reading.

A word sort is a developmental word study activity espoused by the Words Their Way curriculum as written by Donald R. Bear, Marcia Invernizzi, Shane Templeton, and Francine Johnston. The activity focuses students' attention on critical features of words, namely sound, pattern, and meaning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Linnea Ehri</span> American psychologist & scholar

Linnea Carlson Ehri is an American educational psychologist and expert on the development of reading. She is a Distinguished Professor Emerita of Educational Psychology at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. Ehri is known for her theory of orthographic mapping, which describes the process of forming "letter-sound connections to bond the spellings, pronunciations, and meanings of specific words in memory" that underlies fluent reading. As a consequence of orthographic mapping, written words are tightly linked with their pronunciations and meanings in memory and can be recognized by sight.

References

  1. 1 2 "What Are Sight Words?". WeAreTeachers. 2018-04-25. Retrieved 2018-11-30.
  2. Ravitch, Diane. (2007). EdSpeak: A Glossary of Education Terms, Phrases, Buzzwords, and Jargon. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, ISBN   1416605754.
  3. Rapp, S. (1999-09-29). Recognizing words on sight; activity. The Baltimore Sun
  4. Murray, Bruce; McIlwain, Jane (2019). "How do beginners learn to read irregular words as sight words". Journal of Research in Reading. 42 (1): 123–136. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12250 . ISSN   0141-0423. S2CID   150055551.
  5. Seidenberg, Mark (2017). Language at the speed of sight. New York, NY: Basic Books. p. 147. ISBN   978-1-5416-1715-5.
  6. 1 2 Kear, D. J., & Gladhart, M. A. (1983). "Comparative Study to Identify High-Frequency Words in Printed Materials". Perceptual and Motor Skills. 57 (3): 807–810. doi:10.2466/pms.1983.57.3.807. S2CID   144675331.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. "Teaching Sight Words as a Part of Comprehensive Reading Instruction, Iowa reading research centre, 2018-06-12".
  8. "Phonological Ability", The SAGE Encyclopedia of Contemporary Early Childhood Education, SAGE Publications, Inc, 2016, doi:10.4135/9781483340333.n296, ISBN   9781483340357
  9. 1 2 "Sight Words". www.thephonicspage.org. Retrieved 2018-11-30.
  10. Taylor, J. S. H.; Davis, Matthew H.; Rastle, Kathleen (2017). "Comparing and Validating Methods of Reading Instruction Using Behavioural and Neural Findings in an Artificial Orthography" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 146 (6). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, volume 146, No. 6, 826–858: 826–858. doi:10.1037/xge0000301. PMC   5458780 . PMID   28425742.
  11. "Sight Words: An Evidence-Based Literacy Strategy, Understood.org". 16 December 2019.
  12. "A New Model for Teaching High-Frequency Words, reading rockets.org". 6 June 2019.
  13. "Complete report - National Reading Panel, England" (PDF).
  14. "Sample phonics lessons, The State Government of Victoria".
  15. "Foundation skills, The State Government of Victoria, AU".
  16. "English Appendix 1: Spelling, Government of England" (PDF).
  17. "Common Core Standards, Appendix A, USA" (PDF).
  18. "Dolch Words 220, Utah Education Network in partnership with the Utah State Board of Education and Utah System of Higher Education" (PDF).
  19. Edward Fry (1979). 1000 Instant Words: The Most Common Words for Teaching Reading, Writing, and Spelling. ISBN   0809208806.
  20. "McGraw-Hill Education Acknowledges Enduring Contributions of Reading and Language Arts Scholar, Author and Innovator Ed Fry, McGraw-Hill Education, Sep 15, 2010" (Press release).
  21. "Edward B. Fry, PH.D, Published in Los Angeles Times on Sep. 12, 2010". Legacy.com .
  22. "Fry Instant Words, UTAH EDUCATION NETWORK".
  23. Otto, W. & cester, R. (1972). "Sight words for beginning readers". The Journal of Educational Research. 65 (10): 435–443. doi:10.1080/00220671.1972.10884372. JSTOR   /27536333.
  24. "Independent Review of the Primary Curriculum: Final Report, page 87" (PDF).
  25. Ehri, Linnea C. (2017). "Reconceptualizing the Development of Sight Word Reading and Its Relationship to Recoding". Reading Acquisition. London: Routledge. pp. 107–143. ISBN   9781351236898.
  26. Literacy teaching guide : phonics. New South Wales. Department of Education and Training. [Sydney, N.S.W.]: New South Wales Dept. of Education and Training. 2009. ISBN   9780731386093. OCLC   590631697.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  27. Findings and Determinations of the National Reading Panel by Topic Areas
  28. McGuinness, Diane (1997). Why Our Children Can't Read. New York, NY: The Free Press. ISBN   0684831619.
  29. Gatto, John Taylor (2006). "Eyless in Gaza". The Underground History of American Education. Oxford, NY: The Oxford Village Press. pp. 70–72. ISBN   0945700040.
  30. Stanislas Dehaene (2010-10-26). Reading in the brain. Penquin Books. pp. 222–228. ISBN   9780143118053.
  31. Seidenberg, Mark (2017). Language at the speed of light. pp. 143–144=author=Mark Seidenberg. ISBN   9780465080656.