Close reading

Last updated

In literary criticism, close reading is the careful, sustained interpretation of a brief passage of a text. A close reading emphasizes the single and the particular over the general, via close attention to individual words, the syntax, the order in which the sentences unfold ideas, as well as formal structures. [1]

Contents

Close reading is thinking about both what is said in a passage (the content) and how it is said (the form, i.e., the manner in which the content is presented), leading to possibilities for observation and insight.

History

Literary close reading and commentaries have extensive precedent in the exegesis of religious texts, and more broadly, hermeneutics of ancient works. For example, Pazand, a genre of middle Persian literature, refers to the Zend (literally: 'commentary'/'translation') texts that offer explanation and close reading of the Avesta, the sacred texts of Zoroastrianism. [2] The scriptural commentaries of the Talmud offer a commonly cited early predecessor to close reading. [3] In Islamic studies, the close reading of the Quran has flourished and produced an immense corpus. [4] But the closest religious analogy to contemporary literary close reading, and the principal historical connection with its birth, is the rise of the higher criticism, and the evolution of textual criticism of the Bible in Germany in the late eighteenth century.

In the practice of literary studies, the technique of close reading emerged in 1920s Britain in the work of I. A. Richards, his student William Empson, and the poet T.S. Eliot, all of whom sought to replace an "impressionistic" view of literature then dominant with what Richards called a "practical criticism" focused on language and form. American New Critics in the 1930s and 1940s anchored their views in similar fashion, and promoted close reading as a means of understanding that the autonomy of the work (often a poem) mattered more than anything else, including authorial intention, the cultural contexts of reception, and most broadly, ideology. [5] For these critics, including Cleanth Brooks, William K. Wimsatt, John Crowe Ransom, and Allen Tate, only close reading, because of its attentiveness to the nuances and interrelation of language and form, could address the work in its complex unity. [6] Their influence on American literary criticism and English departments held sway for several decades, and even after New Criticism faded from prominence in American universities in the waning years of the Cold War, [7] close reading remained a fundamental, almost naturalized, skill amongst literary critics. [8] [9] [10] By the turn of the 21st century, efforts to historicize New Critical aesthetics and its apolitical pretense prompted scholars, especially in departments of English, to debate the fate of close reading, asking about its status as a critical practice.

In two of its 2010 bulletins, the Association of Departments of English (ADE) featured a cluster of articles that attempted to take stock of what the 21st century held for close reading. The articles were motivated, as all of the scholars remarked, by the changes they had observed in the work of their colleagues and students—as well as in contemporary culture—that made them think again about why close reading mattered to the study of literature. Jonathan Culler noted that because the discipline had taken close reading for granted, it had disappeared from discussions of the goals of literary criticism. [11] For Culler, as for Jane Gallop, that absence needed remedying, and therefore signaled an opportunity for departments of English to renew—in order to capitalize on—one of the more distinctive traits of studying literature. [12] If New Criticism and its isolationist stance had given way to the politicization of literary studies, and if technological developments were changing the very ways in which people read, Culler and Gallop emphasized that the signature of close reading, meticulous attention to the workings of language and form, still had value. N. Katherine Hayles and John Guillory, meanwhile, each interested in the impact of digital media on the ways people read, argued that close reading skills were not only translatable to the digital context, but could also exist productively alongside the hyper-reading that web interfaces and links had generated. [13] [14]

Principles and practice

While New Criticism popularized close reading in universities, it tended to emphasize its principles and offer extended examples rather than prescribe specific methods and practices. As John Guillory points out, close reading entails "a technique, a particular kind of methodical procedure that can be described but not prescribed, and that is transmitted largely by demonstration and imitation." [15] A tendency towards what Vincent B. Leitch calls "canonical statements" [6] appeared in essays and book-length studies, from John Crowe Ransom's "The New Criticism" (1941) and Allen Tate's "A Note on Autotelism" (1949), to Cleanth Brooks' The Well Wrought Urn (1947), [16] Rene Wellek and Austin Warren's Theory of Literature (1949), [17] and W.K. Wimsatt's The Verbal Icon (1954). [18] The first ten chapters of The Well Wrought Urn thus focus individually on poems across British literary history (John Donne, William Shakespeare, John Milton, Alexander Pope, Thomas Gray, John Keats, William Wordsworth, Alfred, Lord Tennyson, W.B. Yeats, and T.S. Eliot) before concluding with "The Heresy of Paraphrase", in which Brooks abstracts the premises on which his analyses rest. Meanwhile, when Wellek and Warren describe their preference for an "intrinsic" study of literature in Theory of Literature, they refer to examples of elements they claim are crucial to a work—from euphony, rhythm, and meter to image, metaphor, and myth—and cite concrete examples of these drawn from literary history, but do not indicate steps by which readers might translate such thinking into their own analyses. Wimsatt takes a mixed approach in The Verbal Icon, combining theoretical chapters ("The Intentional Fallacy", "The Affective Fallacy") with those that discuss concerns he feels are necessary to the study of poetry ("The Concrete Universal", "Symbol and Metaphor", "The Substantive Level", "One Relation of Rhyme to Reason", "When is Variation 'Elegant'?", "Verbal Style: Logical and Counterlogical"), but he too leaves it to his readers to imagine how they might deploy these views.

As Culler notes in his essay for the 2010 bulletin of the American Departments of English, this tendency not to make statements of method meant that most students of the New Critics learned by example. Thus in the New Critical classroom, "the charismatic pedagogue could pose a question you had not thought of about relations between form and meaning or point to a textual difficulty that had escaped your attention." [19] More than fifty years later, this "closeness of close reading" remains vital to the work of more recent thinkers whose thinking has contributed to the radical changes in literary studies and displaced New Criticism. Of these he cites his contemporary, the deconstructionist Barbara Johnson, who stands out for her claim that the value of close reading lies in its capacity for taking seriously what does not immediately make sense. [20] Well aware of the stark differences between New Criticism and deconstruction, Culler here brings the two together, suggesting that their shared investments indicate an understanding of close reading worth maintaining.

In French criticism, close reading is similar to explication de texte , the tradition of textual interpretation in literary study, as proposed by Gustave Lanson. As an analytical technique, close reading compares and contrasts the concept of distant reading, the technique for "understanding literature, not by studying particular texts, but by aggregating and analyzing massive amounts of data", as described, by Kathryn Schulz, in "What is Distant Reading?", an article about the literary scholar Franco Moretti. [21]

Examples

Brooks's discussion of John Keats's "Ode on a Grecian Urn" embodies his use of close reading. In "Keats's Sylvan Historian", he finds the controversy over the poem's famous lines misplaced, and insists instead that "the ambiguity" of "Beauty is truth, truth beauty—that is all/Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know" is best understood as an expression of the urn itself (151–153). The poem pursues this ambiguity, he writes, in lines that describe the urn on the one hand as a "bride of quietness" and a "foster-child of silence" and on the other, a "sylvan historian" (155). In this way the poem describes the urn in paradoxical terms much as the urn utters a paradoxical line. Brooks then pursues this logic by considering how "sylvan historian" might not only describe the urn as a kind of historian but also the kind of history the urn is said to tell. Further, if he claims that this history is uncertain because it's not clear "what men or gods" feature in it, he continues that line of thinking as he proceeds through the ode's stanzas: when he emphasizes that the "unheard melodies" of the figures depicted on the urn's face are "sweeter than any audible music", that "action goes on though the actors are motionless", that "the maiden, always to be kissed, never actually kissed", that the "boughs...cannot shed their leaves", and when he claims that this "ironic undercurrent" only increases over the course of the poem, to culminate in those infamous lines (156–159, 164). From following the poem in this way, Brooks arrives at the assertion that his interpretation is "derived from the context of the "Ode" itself" (164).

Brooks's close reading is typical of the New Critical investment in the textual object alone. Yet scholars have also found close reading productive for more politically and socially invested work, thereby refusing the New Critical belief in literary transcendence while seizing on the care with which it treated textuality. In The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination (1979), best known as one of the earliest statements of feminist literary criticism, Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar deployed close reading to make a case for the distinctiveness of the female literary imagination. The sixteen chapters of Madwoman thus pursue their arguments—that women writers expressed their anxiety about authorship, their rage over being constrained to docile femininity, their canny encoding of their patriarchal critique—with the attention to language, imagery, and form Gilbert and Gubar had been trained to wield as graduate students in the late 1960s. New Critical echoes are thus evident in the individual chapters devoted to close readings of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights, Charlotte Bronte's The Professor, JaneEyre, Shirley, and Villette, but so is the political innovation. Reviewers—academic and mainstream—recognized this trait, describing the two scholars as "gnostic heretics who claim to have found the secret code that unlocks the mysteries in old texts" (Schreiber 11) [22] and their interpretations as a "skillful joint peeling away of the layers" of women's writing" (129). [23]

In an even more extreme example, Jacques Derrida in Ulysses Gramophone devotes eighty-six pages to the word "yes" in James Joyce's novel Ulysses, an effort which J. Hillis Miller describes as a "hyperbolic, extravagant, even outrageous explosion" of the technique of close reading. [24]

Teaching close reading in the United States

The push for more close-reading instruction in primary and secondary education is partially due to increased feedback from college professors in the early-mid 2000s that students were arriving in university classrooms with few comprehension skills. [25] The increased demand for students to acquire concrete skills in high school that they would need in transitioning to higher education and to adult life culminated in the creation of the Common Core State Standards in 2009. [26] Since then, there has been a push for English language arts (ELA) teachers, especially at the secondary level, to help students develop close-reading strategies. Several of the ELA standards for reading literature require students to be able to cite direct textual evidence, and to analyze words in context. For example, CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RL.9-10.4 asks students to "Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone (e.g., how the language evokes a sense of time and place; how it sets a formal or informal tone)." [27]

Strategies

Today, as most states have adopted the Common Core Standards, [28] there is an increasing number of resources designed to help teachers instruct and implement close-reading strategies in their classrooms. In 2012, Kylene Beers and Robert E. Probst published Notice & Note: Strategies for Close Reading, which established six "signposts" that alert readers to significant moments in a work of literature and encourage students to read closely. [29]

Another resource, developed by Beth Burke (NBCT) for the Tampa Bay Times NIE (Newspaper in Education), presents the steps involved in close reading and how to scaffold the strategies for students. She recommends using the "gradual release model" [30] in instruction, beginning by modeling a close reading in front of the class, then having students work on the strategy in groups before attempting it alone.

Additional ways students are supported in close-reading instruction include providing graphic organizers that help them group their ideas with textual evidence. [31] Many other educational resources and guides to close reading exist in order to help students of all levels and in particular, close reading poetry. For example, see The Close Reading of Poetry: A Practical Introduction and Guide to Explication. [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Literary theory</span> Systematic study of the nature of literature

Literary theory is the systematic study of the nature of literature and of the methods for literary analysis. Since the 19th century, literary scholarship includes literary theory and considerations of intellectual history, moral philosophy, social philosophy, and interdisciplinary themes relevant to how people interpret meaning. In the humanities in modern academia, the latter style of literary scholarship is an offshoot of post-structuralism. Consequently, the word theory became an umbrella term for scholarly approaches to reading texts, some of which are informed by strands of semiotics, cultural studies, philosophy of language, and continental philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Literary criticism</span> Study, evaluation, and interpretation of literature

A genre of arts criticism, literary criticism or literary studies is the study, evaluation, and interpretation of literature. Modern literary criticism is often influenced by literary theory, which is the philosophical analysis of literature's goals and methods. Although the two activities are closely related, literary critics are not always, and have not always been, theorists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Crowe Ransom</span> American writer and literary critic

John Crowe Ransom was an American educator, scholar, literary critic, poet, essayist and editor. He is considered to be a founder of the New Criticism school of literary criticism. As a faculty member at Kenyon College, he was the first editor of the widely regarded Kenyon Review. Highly respected as a teacher and mentor to a generation of accomplished students, he also was a prize-winning poet and essayist. He was nominated for the 1973 Nobel Prize in Literature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reader-response criticism</span> School of literary theory focused on writings readers

Reader-response criticism is a school of literary theory that focuses on the reader and their experience of a literary work, in contrast to other schools and theories that focus attention primarily on the author or the content and form of the work.

New Criticism was a formalist movement in literary theory that dominated American literary criticism in the middle decades of the 20th century. It emphasized close reading, particularly of poetry, to discover how a work of literature functioned as a self-contained, self-referential aesthetic object. The movement derived its name from John Crowe Ransom's 1941 book The New Criticism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">I. A. Richards</span> English literary critic and rhetorician

Ivor Armstrong Richards CH, known as I. A. Richards, was an English educator, literary critic, poet, and rhetorician. His work contributed to the foundations of New Criticism, a formalist movement in literary theory which emphasized the close reading of a literary text, especially poetry, in an effort to discover how a work of literature functions as a self-contained and self-referential æsthetic object.

William Kurtz Wimsatt Jr. was an American professor of English, literary theorist, and critic. Wimsatt is often associated with the concept of the intentional fallacy, which he developed with Monroe Beardsley in order to question the importance of an author's intentions for the creation of a work of art.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cleanth Brooks</span> American literary critic and professor

Cleanth Brooks was an American literary critic and professor. He is best known for his contributions to New Criticism in the mid-20th century and for revolutionizing the teaching of poetry in American higher education. His best-known works, The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry (1947) and Modern Poetry and the Tradition (1939), argue for the centrality of ambiguity and paradox as a way of understanding poetry. With his writing, Brooks helped to formulate formalist criticism, emphasizing "the interior life of a poem" and codifying the principles of close reading.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ode on a Grecian Urn</span> 1819 poem by John Keats

"Ode on a Grecian Urn" is a poem written by the English Romantic poet John Keats in May 1819, first published anonymously in Annals of the Fine Arts for 1819.

In literary theory and aesthetics, authorial intent refers to an author's intent as it is encoded in their work. Authorial intentionalism is the view that an author's intentions should constrain the ways in which a text is properly interpreted. Opponents, who undermined its hermeneutical importance, have labelled this position the intentional fallacy and count it among the informal fallacies.

"The Death of the Author" is a 1967 essay by the French literary critic and theorist Roland Barthes (1915–1980). Barthes' essay argues against traditional literary criticism's practice of relying on the intentions and biography of an author to definitively explain the "ultimate meaning" of a text. Instead, the essay emphasizes the primacy of each individual reader's interpretation of the work over any "definitive" meaning intended by the author, a process in which subtle or unnoticed characteristics may be drawn out for new insight. The essay's first English-language publication was in the American journal Aspen, no. 5–6 in 1967; the French debut was in the magazine Manteia, no. 5 (1968). The essay later appeared in an anthology of Barthes' essays, Image-Music-Text (1977), a book that also included his "From Work to Text".

<i>Understanding Poetry</i>

Understanding Poetry was an American college textbook and poetry anthology by Cleanth Brooks and Robert Penn Warren, first published in 1938. The book influenced New Criticism and went through its fourth edition in 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wilbur Marshall Urban</span> American philosopher

Wilbur Marshall Urban was an American philosopher of language, influenced by Ernst Cassirer. He wrote also on religion, axiology, ethics and idealism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">She dwelt among the untrodden ways</span>

"She Dwelt Among the Untrodden Ways" is a three-stanza poem written by the English Romantic poet William Wordsworth in 1798 when he was 28 years old. The verse was first printed in Lyrical Ballads, 1800, a volume of Wordsworth's and Samuel Taylor Coleridge's poems that marked a climacteric in the English Romantic movement. The poem is the best known of Wordsworth's series of five works which comprise his "Lucy" series, and was a favorite amongst early readers. It was composed both as a meditation on his own feelings of loneliness and loss, and as an ode to the beauty and dignity of an idealized woman who lived unnoticed by all others except by the poet himself. The title line implies Lucy lived unknown and remote, both physically and intellectually. The poet's subject's isolated sensitivity expresses a characteristic aspect of Romantic expectations of the human, and especially of the poet's condition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Canonization</span> Poem by John Donne

"The Canonization" is a poem by English metaphysical poet John Donne. First published in 1633, the poem is viewed as exemplifying Donne's wit and irony. It is addressed to one friend from another, but concerns itself with the complexities of romantic love: the speaker presents love as so all-consuming that lovers forgo other pursuits to spend time together. In this sense, love is asceticism, a major conceit in the poem. The poem's title serves a dual purpose: while the speaker argues that his love will canonise him into a kind of sainthood, the poem itself functions as a canonisation of the pair of lovers.

<i>The Well Wrought Urn</i> 1947 essay collection by Cleanth Brooks

The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry is a 1947 collection of essays by Cleanth Brooks. It is considered a seminal text in the New Critical school of literary criticism. The title contains an allusion to the fourth stanza of John Donne's poem, "The Canonization", which is the primary subject of the first chapter of the book.

In literature, the paradox is an anomalous juxtaposition of incongruous ideas for the sake of striking exposition or unexpected insight. It functions as a method of literary composition and analysis that involves examining apparently contradictory statements and drawing conclusions either to reconcile them or to explain their presence.

<i>Theory of Literature</i> Book by René Wellek and Austin Warren

Theory of Literature is a book on literary scholarship by René Wellek, of the structuralist Prague school, and Austin Warren, a self-described "old New Critic". The two met at the University of Iowa in the late 1930s, and by 1940 had begun writing the book; they wrote collaboratively, in a single voice over a period of three years. Its contents were based on their shared understandings of literature.

John David Guillory is an American literary critic best known for his book Cultural Capital (1993). He is the Julius Silver Professor of English at New York University.

References

  1. ↑ "Close Reading" (PDF). Pennsylvania: Bucks County Community College. 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-09-03.
  2. ↑ Williams Jackson, A.V. (2008) [1896]. Warner, Charles Dudley (ed.). The Avesta. Vol. III. New York: Cosimo, Inc. pp. 1084, 1086. ISBN   978-1-60520-191-7.
  3. ↑ Bruns, Gerald L. (1992). Hermeneutics, ancient and modern. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN   978-0300054507. OCLC   25832229.
  4. ↑ Wielandt, Rotraud. McAuliffe, Jane Dammen (ed.). "Exegesis of the Qur'an: Early Modern and Contemporary". referenceworks.brillonline.com. Retrieved 10 August 2018.
  5. ↑ Gerald, Graff (1987). Professing literature : an institutional history. Chicago. ISBN   978-0226306032. OCLC   13795373.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  6. 1 2 Leitch, Vincent B. (2010). American literary criticism since the 1930s. Leitch, Vincent B., 1944- (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN   978-0415778176. OCLC   297149196.
  7. ↑ Gerald, Graff (1987). Professing literature : an institutional history. Chicago. p. 227. ISBN   978-0226306032. OCLC   13795373.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  8. ↑ Cain, William E. (1984). The crisis in criticism : theory, literature, and reform in English studies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN   978-0801831911. OCLC   10323916.
  9. ↑ Walhout, Mark (December 1987). "The New Criticism and the Crisis of American Liberalism: The Poetics of the Cold War". College English. 49 (8): 861–871. doi:10.2307/378114. JSTOR   378114.
  10. ↑ Mao, Douglas (1996). "The New Critics and the Text-Object". ELH. 63 (1): 227–254. doi:10.1353/elh.1996.0007. JSTOR   30030280. S2CID   161883450.
  11. ↑ Culler, Jonathan (2012). "The Closeness of Close Reading". ADE Bulletin. 152 (1). doi:10.1632/ade.152.0. ISSN   0001-0898.
  12. ↑ ADE Bulletin. 152 (1). 2012. doi:10.1632/ade.152.0. ISSN   0001-0898.{{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  13. ↑ Guillory, John (2012). "Close Reading: Prologue and Epilogue". ADE Bulletin. 152 (1). doi:10.1632/ade.152.0. ISSN   0001-0898.
  14. ↑ Hayles, N. Katherine (2012). "How We Read: Close, Hyper, Machine". ADE Bulletin. 152 (1). doi:10.1632/ade.152.0. ISSN   0001-0898.
  15. ↑ Guillory, John (2025). Newstok, Scott (ed.). On Close Reading. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ISBN   9780226837437.
  16. ↑ Brooks, Cleanth (1947). The well wrought urn : studies in the structure of poetry. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. ISBN   978-0156957052. OCLC   4908303.
  17. ↑ René, Wellek (1956). Theory of literature. Warren, Austin, 1899-1986 (3d ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. ISBN   978-0156890847. OCLC   1944737.
  18. ↑ Wimsatt, William K. (1954). The verbal icon : studies in the meaning of poetry . Lexington, Ky.: University of Kentucky Press. ISBN   978-0813101118. OCLC   328522.
  19. ↑ Culler, Jonathan (2010). "The Closeness of Close Reading". ADE Bulletin. 149 (1): 23. doi:10.1632/ade.149.20. ISSN   0001-0898.
  20. ↑ Johnson, Barbara (1985). Atkins, George Michael; Johnson, Michael L. (eds.). Teaching Deconstructively. Lawrence, Kansas: Univ. Press of Kansas. p. 140. ISBN   978-0700002832. OCLC   65306717.{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  21. ↑ Schulz, Kathryn (June 24, 2011). "What Is Distant Reading?". The New York Times.
  22. ↑ Schreiber, Le Anne (December 9, 1979). "I'm Nobody, Who Are You?". The New York Times Review of Books: 11, 32–3.
  23. ↑ Kolodny, Annette (March 1980). "Rev. of The Madwoman in the Attic". American Literature. 52 (1): 128–132. doi:10.2307/2925194. JSTOR   2925194.
  24. ↑ Miller, J. Hillis (2001). "Derrida and literature". In Cohen, Tom (ed.). Jacques Derrida and the Humanities: A Critical Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 58–81. ISBN   9780521625654 . Retrieved 14 December 2020.
  25. ↑ "Closing in on Close Reading - Educational Leadership". www.ascd.org. Archived from the original on 2019-04-20. Retrieved 2018-02-07.
  26. ↑ "About the Standards | Common Core State Standards Initiative". www.corestandards.org. Archived from the original on 2019-11-15. Retrieved 2018-02-07.
  27. ↑ "English Language Arts Standards » Reading: Literature » Grade 9-10 | Common Core State Standards Initiative". www.corestandards.org. Archived from the original on 2019-06-09. Retrieved 2018-02-07.
  28. ↑ "Standards in Your State | Common Core State Standards Initiative". www.corestandards.org. Archived from the original on 2018-01-18. Retrieved 2018-02-07.
  29. ↑ Beers, Kylene. "Notice & Note: Strategies for Close Reading" (PDF). Heinemann.
  30. ↑ Burke, Beth. "Closing in on Close Reading" (PDF). Tampa Bay Times.
  31. ↑ "Close Reading Graphic Organizer" (PDF). State of Wyoming.
  32. ↑ "The Close Reading of Poetry: Introduction: Poking and Probing with Questions". web.uvic.ca.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.