This article needs additional citations for verification .(November 2025) |
This article may incorporate text from a large language model .(November 2025) |
The Silicon Shield is a geopolitical and free enterprise strategy of prevention utilized by the country of Taiwan to deter a military invasion from China, also known as forced unification [1] [2] .
The geopolitical strength of the semiconductor industry in Taiwan is often referred to as Taiwan's "Silicon Shield." [4] Microchips are made out of silicon. According to the New York Times, "Taiwan has relied on its dominance of the microchip industry for its defense," and that, "because its semiconductor industry is so important to Chinese manufacturing and the United States consumer economy, actions that threaten its foundries would be too risky." [5]
In 2022 Matthew Pottinger challenged the existence of a Silicon Shield arguing that China does not behave in ways which appear rational to audiences in democratic countries. [6]
The Chinese Communist Party has for decades claimed Taiwan is a rogue province and is part of China's sovereign territory through their One-China Policy. Not long after the communists won the Chinese Civil War in 1949, did tensions flare between Beijing, Taipei and Washington DC. The First Taiwan Strait Crisis and the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis happened in 1954 and 1958 respectively. It wasn't until 1995 that a Third Taiwan Strait Crisis happened.
Then in January 2019, a potential fourth crisis began to brew when Chinese dictator Xi Jinping declared a desire to invade Taiwan using military force. [7] A month after the Taiwan threat, China proposed the 2019 Hong Kong Extradition Bill which was immediately followed by the infamous 2019-2020 Hong Kong Protests. The totality of threats against their sovereignty, the events in Hong Kong, followed closely by the COVID-19 lockdowns in China and China's Zero-COVID Policy, was not lost on Taiwan regarding their own security. [8] [9] The island nation has made it abundantly clear that they do not want China's One Country, Two Systems. [10]
China has been accused of using what its critics call Salami Slicing Tactics in the South China Sea. Taiwan is not the only neighbor feeling Beijing's squeeze as evidenced by China's nine-dash line claims over virtually the entire South China Sea.
Starting in 1987, Taiwan fortuitously orchestrated international relations and began to pull the manufacturing microchips lever using the Foundry Model. To oversimplify it, American companies maintain control over chip design while Taiwan makes the chips. It also doesn't hurt being right next to the supply chain of the largest manufacturer in the world, China, who the US is seemingly always looking for opportunities to stick it to. In any case, the idea of the Foundry Model was conceived of by TSMC founder Morris Chang, and was implemented to great success.
In 1990, the US manufactured 37% of the world's microchips. [11] By 2020, TSMC alone accounted for more than 50% of the global wafer foundry market. [12] Furthermore, according to a briefing from the US International Trade Commission in 2024, Taiwan was "capturing nearly 70 percent of global foundry revenue in recent years." [13]
It wasn't until the 2020's, after the COVID-19 Pandemic, that Americans became astutely aware of the strategic complications accompanying the gradual shift in chip manufacturing. [14] Up to that point, the US was seemingly running on autopilot following the end of the Cold War. Due to supply chain issues that reared their ugly head during the international health crisis, the global economy soon experienced massive price increases known as the 2021–2023 inflation surge.
In 2022, President Joe Biden threatened China with war if they tired to invade Taiwan. [15] A Chinese invasion of Taiwan would drastically increase the cost of microchips. [16] In 2024, two years after America passed the CHIPS and Science Act, Taiwan was still responsible for manufacturing 90% of the world's most advanced semiconductors. [17]
Polling from the Election Study Center, National Chengchi University in Taipei consistently shows a complete lack of desire for Unification, which has never polled above 5% in the 30+ years of results. [18] The annual polls cited measure Taiwanese Independence Stances from 1994-2025. Non Response (26.3% in '95) beat Maintain Status Quo, Decide At Later Date (24.8% '95) in the poll one time. In 2020, Maintain Status Quo, Move Toward Independence (25.8% in '20) and Maintain Status Quo Indefinitely (26.5% in '20) almost beat Maintain Status Quo, Decide At Later Date (28.8% in '20). In the most recent years from the poll, Maintain Status Quo Indefinitely has been winning, (29.4% in '22, 33.2% in '23, 34.1% in '24 and 34.6% in '25) marking the end of Maintain Status Quo, Decide At Later Date's dominance in the polls since 1996.
America is looking to grow its foundry industry. [19] Further more, Taiwan is an island and there's no NATO land bridge like there is to Ukraine, making resupply difficult if not impossible after a conflict begins. [20] Once an invasion starts, Taiwan is on their own, especially if US support falls through. [21] No single country has the logistical and military capabilities to aid Taiwan to victory from Chinese invasion besides the US. [22]