Snake lemma

Last updated October 10, 2022

The snake lemma is a tool used in mathematics, particularly homological algebra, to construct long exact sequences. The snake lemma is valid in every abelian category and is a crucial tool in homological algebra and its applications, for instance in algebraic topology. Homomorphisms constructed with its help are generally called connecting homomorphisms.

Statement

In an abelian category (such as the category of abelian groups or the category of vector spaces over a given field), consider a commutative diagram:

where the rows are exact sequences and 0 is the zero object.

Then there is an exact sequence relating the kernels and cokernels of a, b, and c:

\ker a~{\color {Gray}\longrightarrow }~\ker b~{\color {Gray}\longrightarrow }~\ker c~{\overset {d}{\longrightarrow }}~\operatorname {coker} a~{\color {Gray}\longrightarrow }~\operatorname {coker} b~{\color {Gray}\longrightarrow }~\operatorname {coker} c

where d is a homomorphism, known as the connecting homomorphism.

Furthermore, if the morphism f is a monomorphism, then so is the morphism $\ker a~{\color {Gray}\longrightarrow }~\ker b$ , and if g' is an epimorphism, then so is $\operatorname {coker} b~{\color {Gray}\longrightarrow }~\operatorname {coker} c$ .

The cokernels here are: $\operatorname {coker} a=A'/\operatorname {im} a$ , $\operatorname {coker} b=B'/\operatorname {im} b$ , $\operatorname {coker} c=C'/\operatorname {im} c$ .

Explanation of the name

To see where the snake lemma gets its name, expand the diagram above as follows:

and then note that the exact sequence that is the conclusion of the lemma can be drawn on this expanded diagram in the reversed "S" shape of a slithering snake.

Construction of the maps

The maps between the kernels and the maps between the cokernels are induced in a natural manner by the given (horizontal) maps because of the diagram's commutativity. The exactness of the two induced sequences follows in a straightforward way from the exactness of the rows of the original diagram. The important statement of the lemma is that a connecting homomorphismd exists which completes the exact sequence.

In the case of abelian groups or modules over some ring, the map d can be constructed as follows:

Pick an element x in ker c and view it as an element of C; since g is surjective, there exists y in B with g(y) = x. Because of the commutativity of the diagram, we have g'(b(y)) = c(g(y)) = c(x) = 0 (since x is in the kernel of c), and therefore b(y) is in the kernel of g' . Since the bottom row is exact, we find an element z in A' with f '(z) = b(y). z is unique by injectivity of f '. We then define d(x) = z + im(a). Now one has to check that d is well-defined (i.e., d(x) only depends on x and not on the choice of y), that it is a homomorphism, and that the resulting long sequence is indeed exact. One may routinely verify the exactness by diagram chasing (see the proof of Lemma 9.1 in ^[1]).

Once that is done, the theorem is proven for abelian groups or modules over a ring. For the general case, the argument may be rephrased in terms of properties of arrows and cancellation instead of elements. Alternatively, one may invoke Mitchell's embedding theorem.

Naturality

In the applications, one often needs to show that long exact sequences are "natural" (in the sense of natural transformations). This follows from the naturality of the sequence produced by the snake lemma.

If

is a commutative diagram with exact rows, then the snake lemma can be applied twice, to the "front" and to the "back", yielding two long exact sequences; these are related by a commutative diagram of the form

Example

Let $k$ be field, $V$ be a $k$ -vector space. $V$ is $k[t]$ -module by $t:V\to V$ being a $k$ -linear transformation, so we can tensor $V$ and $k$ over $k[t]$ .

V\otimes _{k[t]}k=V\otimes _{k[t]}(k[t]/(t))=V/tV=\operatorname {coker} (t).

Given a short exact sequence of $k$ -vector spaces $0\to M\to N\to P\to 0$ , we can induce an exact sequence $M\otimes _{k[t]}k\to N\otimes _{k[t]}k\to P\otimes _{k[t]}k\to 0$ by right exactness of tensor product. But the sequence $0\to M\otimes _{k[t]}k\to N\otimes _{k[t]}k\to P\otimes _{k[t]}k\to 0$ is not exact in general. Hence, a natural question arises. Why is this sequence not exact?

According to the diagram above, we can induce an exact sequence $\ker(t_{M})\to \ker(t_{N})\to \ker(t_{P})\to M\otimes _{k[t]}k\to N\otimes _{k[t]}k\to P\otimes _{k[t]}k\to 0$ by applying the snake lemma. Thus, the snake lemma reflects the tensor product's failure to be exact.

In the category of groups

While many results of homological algebra, such as the five lemma or the nine lemma, hold for abelian categories as well as in the category of groups, the snake lemma does not. Indeed, arbitrary cokernels do not exist. However, one can replace cokernels by (left) cosets $A'/\operatorname {im} a$ , $B'/\operatorname {im} b$ , and $C'/\operatorname {im} c$ . Then the connecting homomorphism can still be defined, and one can write down a sequence as in the statement of the snake lemma. This will always be a chain complex, but it may fail to be exact. Exactness can be asserted, however, when the vertical sequences in the diagram are exact, that is, when the images of a, b, and c are normal subgroups.^{[ citation needed ]}

Counterexample

Consider the alternating group $A_{5}$ : this contains a subgroup isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_{3}$ , which in turn can be written as a semidirect product of cyclic groups: $S_{3}\simeq C_{3}\rtimes C_{2}$ .^[2] This gives rise to the following diagram with exact rows:

{\begin{matrix}&1&\to &C_{3}&\to &C_{3}&\to 1\\&\downarrow &&\downarrow &&\downarrow \\1\to &1&\to &S_{3}&\to &A_{5}\end{matrix}}

Note that the middle column is not exact: $C_{2}$ is not a normal subgroup in the semidirect product.

Since $A_{5}$ is simple, the right vertical arrow has trivial cokernel. Meanwhile the quotient group $S_{3}/C_{3}$ is isomorphic to $C_{2}$ . The sequence in the statement of the snake lemma is therefore

1\longrightarrow 1\longrightarrow 1\longrightarrow 1\longrightarrow C_{2}\longrightarrow 1

,

which indeed fails to be exact.

In popular culture

The proof of the snake lemma is taught by Jill Clayburgh's character at the very beginning of the 1980 film It's My Turn .^[3]

Related Research Articles

In mathematics, specifically abstract algebra, the isomorphism theorems are theorems that describe the relationship between quotients, homomorphisms, and subobjects. Versions of the theorems exist for groups, rings, vector spaces, modules, Lie algebras, and various other algebraic structures. In universal algebra, the isomorphism theorems can be generalized to the context of algebras and congruences.

In mathematics, especially homological algebra and other applications of abelian category theory, the five lemma is an important and widely used lemma about commutative diagrams. The five lemma is not only valid for abelian categories but also works in the category of groups, for example.

An exact sequence is a sequence of morphisms between objects such that the image of one morphism equals the kernel of the next.

In mathematics, and more specifically in homological algebra, the splitting lemma states that in any abelian category, the following statements are equivalent for a short exact sequence

In mathematics, a chain complex is an algebraic structure that consists of a sequence of abelian groups and a sequence of homomorphisms between consecutive groups such that the image of each homomorphism is included in the kernel of the next. Associated to a chain complex is its homology, which describes how the images are included in the kernels.

Homological algebra is the branch of mathematics that studies homology in a general algebraic setting. It is a relatively young discipline, whose origins can be traced to investigations in combinatorial topology and abstract algebra at the end of the 19th century, chiefly by Henri Poincaré and David Hilbert.

In mathematics, homology is a general way of associating a sequence of algebraic objects, such as abelian groups or modules, with other mathematical objects such as topological spaces. Homology groups were originally defined in algebraic topology. Similar constructions are available in a wide variety of other contexts, such as abstract algebra, groups, Lie algebras, Galois theory, and algebraic geometry.

The cokernel of a linear mapping of vector spaces $f : X \to Y$ is the quotient space $Y / im(f)$ of the codomain of $f$ by the image of $f$ . The dimension of the cokernel is called the corank of $f$ .

In mathematics, particularly in algebra, the class of projective modules enlarges the class of free modules over a ring, by keeping some of the main properties of free modules. Various equivalent characterizations of these modules appear below.

In mathematics, certain functors may be derived to obtain other functors closely related to the original ones. This operation, while fairly abstract, unifies a number of constructions throughout mathematics.

Mitchell's embedding theorem, also known as the Freyd–Mitchell theorem or the full embedding theorem, is a result about abelian categories; it essentially states that these categories, while rather abstractly defined, are in fact concrete categories of modules. This allows one to use element-wise diagram chasing proofs in these categories. The theorem is named after Barry Mitchell and Peter Freyd.

In mathematics, particularly homological algebra, an exact functor is a functor that preserves short exact sequences. Exact functors are convenient for algebraic calculations because they can be directly applied to presentations of objects. Much of the work in homological algebra is designed to cope with functors that fail to be exact, but in ways that can still be controlled.

In algebra, a module homomorphism is a function between modules that preserves the module structures. Explicitly, if M and N are left modules over a ring R, then a function $is called an R - module homomorphism or an R - linear map if for any x, y in M and r in R,$

In algebra, a flat module over a ring R is an R-module M such that taking the tensor product over R with M preserves exact sequences. A module is faithfully flat if taking the tensor product with a sequence produces an exact sequence if and only if the original sequence is exact.

In mathematics, the category Grp has the class of all groups for objects and group homomorphisms for morphisms. As such, it is a concrete category. The study of this category is known as group theory.

In mathematics, the Ext functors are the derived functors of the Hom functor. Along with the Tor functor, Ext is one of the core concepts of homological algebra, in which ideas from algebraic topology are used to define invariants of algebraic structures. The cohomology of groups, Lie algebras, and associative algebras can all be defined in terms of Ext. The name comes from the fact that the first Ext group Ext¹ classifies extensions of one module by another.

In mathematics, the Tor functors are the derived functors of the tensor product of modules over a ring. Along with the Ext functor, Tor is one of the central concepts of homological algebra, in which ideas from algebraic topology are used to construct invariants of algebraic structures. The homology of groups, Lie algebras, and associative algebras can all be defined in terms of Tor. The name comes from a relation between the first Tor group Tor₁ and the torsion subgroup of an abelian group.

In mathematics, particularly homological algebra, the zig-zag lemma asserts the existence of a particular long exact sequence in the homology groups of certain chain complexes. The result is valid in every abelian category.

Module theory is the branch of mathematics in which modules are studied. This is a glossary of some terms of the subject.

In algebra, a free presentation of a module M over a commutative ring R is an exact sequence of R-modules:

References

↑ Lang 2002 , p. 159
↑ "Extensions of C2 by C3". GroupNames. Retrieved 2021-11-06.
↑ Schochet, C. L. (1999). "The Topological Snake Lemma and Corona Algebras" (PDF). New York Journal of Mathematics. 5: 131–7. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.73.1568 . Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.

Lang, Serge (2002). "III §9 The Snake Lemma". Algebra (3rd ed.). Springer. pp. 157–9. ISBN 978-0-387-95385-4.
Atiyah, M.F.; Macdonald, I. G. (1969). Introduction to Commutative Algebra. Addison–Wesley. ISBN 0-201-00361-9.
Hilton, P.; Stammbach, U. (1997). A course in homological algebra. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer. p. 99. ISBN 0-387-94823-6.

External links

Weisstein, Eric W. "Snake Lemma". MathWorld .
Snake Lemma at PlanetMath
Proof of the Snake Lemma in the film It's My Turn

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] Lang 2002 , p. 159

[2] "Extensions of C2 by C3". GroupNames. Retrieved 2021-11-06.

[3] Schochet, C. L. (1999). "The Topological Snake Lemma and Corona Algebras" (PDF). New York Journal of Mathematics. 5: 131–7. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.73.1568 . Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.

[1]

[2]

[3]