Social informatics

Last updated

Social informatics is the study of information and communication tools in cultural or institutional contexts. [1] Another definition is the interdisciplinary study of the design, uses and consequences of information technologies that takes into account their interaction with institutional and cultural contexts. [2] A transdisciplinary field, [3] social informatics is part of a larger body of socio-economic research that examines the ways in which the technological artifact and human social context mutually constitute the information and communications technology (ICT) ensemble. [4] Some proponents of social informatics use the relationship of a biological community to its environment as an analogy for the relationship of tools to people who use them. The Center for Social Informatics founded by the late Dr. Rob Kling, an early champion of the field's ideas, defines the field thus:

Contents

Social Informatics (SI) refers to the body of research and study that examines social aspects of computerization – including the roles of information technology in social and organizational change, the uses of information technologies in social contexts, and the ways that the social organization of information technologies is influenced by social forces and social practices. [5]

Research

Historically, Western European concepts of social informatics research has been strong in the Scandinavian countries and the UK. [6] The beginnings can be traced to the 1980s in Norway and Slovenia. [7] The fundamentals of social informatics in the USA were laid by Kling in 1996 with his colleagues and students from Indiana University. [7] Within North America, the field is represented largely through independent research efforts at a number of diverse institutions. [3] There are several approaches, which were historically named or classified as social informatics: American, Russian, British, Norwegian, Slovenian, German and Japanese. [8] The oldest concept of social informatics was founded in the USSR by A.V. Sokolov and his colleagues in the 1970s. [8] [9]

Social informatics research diverges from earlier, deterministic (both social and technological) models for measuring the social impacts of technology. Such technological deterministic models characterized information technologies as tools to be installed and used with a pre-determined set of impacts on society which are dictated by the technology's stated capabilities. [6] Similarly, the socially deterministic theory represented by some proponents of the social construction of technology (SCOT) or social shaping of technology theory as advocated by Williams & Edge (1996) [6] see technology the product of human social forces. In contrast, some social informatics methodologies consider the context surrounding technology and the material properties of the technology to be equally important: the people who will interact with a system, the organizational policies governing work practice, and support resources. [4] This contextual inquiry produces "nuanced conceptual understanding" of systems that can be used to examine issues like access to technology, electronic forms of communication, and large-scale networks. [10]

Research in social informatics can be categorized into three orientations. [3] Normative research focuses on the development of theories based on empirical analysis that may be used to develop organizational policies and work practices. [10] The heart of such analyses lies in socio-technical interaction networks, [10] a framework built around the idea that humans and the technologies they build are "co-constitutive", bound together, and that any examination of one must necessarily consider the other. Studies of the analytical orientation develop theory or define methodologies to contribute to theorizing in institutional settings. [10] Critical analysis, like Lucy Suchman’s examination of articulation work, [11] examine technological solutions from non-traditional perspectives in order to influence design and implementation. [3] [10]

Future

Social informatics is a young intellectual movement and its future is still being defined. However, because SST theorists such as Williams and Edge suggest that the amorphous boundaries between humans and technology that emerge in social shaping technology research indicate that technology is not a distinct social endeavor worthy of individual study, [6] indicating that there is a need for social informatics research that bridges the gap between technological and social determinism. This observation, coupled with the many fields that contribute research, suggest a future in which social informatics theories and concepts settle to form a substrate, an "indispensable analytical foundation" [10] for work in other disciplines. Such foundations can be found in social informatics frameworks such as The Web of Computing perspective or Socio-Technical Interaction Networks. [12]

Relevant topics about future direction of social informatics are discussed in the book by Fichman and Rosenbaum. [7] Conceptualization of international discourse, including current trends in research and direction of social informatics development is presented in an article by Smutny. [8] This article discusses current possibilities of development of social informatics within the international discourse of various concepts including possible areas for future cooperation. Other topical article by Marcinkowski [13] presents a perspective shift from studying only the effects of the implementation and use of technology to the primary discussion of what are the ideological implications of empirical work in social informatics connected with data analytics approach.

In education

Social informatics is also about teaching social issues of computing to computer science students. [14] Depending on educational traditions, social informatics is scattered in the curriculum of different disciplines, as well as in computer science, information science, informatics (Europe) and web sociology. [2] In some instances there might be a lack of understanding of why teaching social issues of computing is important, both by individual lecturers and students, resulting in a view that social informatics is boring and without importance. [15] Some researchers have pointed out that in order to create awareness of the importance of social issues of computing, one has to focus on didactics of social informatics. [15]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Information science</span> Academic field concerned with collection and analysis of information

Information science is an academic field which is primarily concerned with analysis, collection, classification, manipulation, storage, retrieval, movement, dissemination, and protection of information. Practitioners within and outside the field study the application and the usage of knowledge in organizations in addition to the interaction between people, organizations, and any existing information systems with the aim of creating, replacing, improving, or understanding the information systems.

Sociotechnical systems (STS) in organizational development is an approach to complex organizational work design that recognizes the interaction between people and technology in workplaces. The term also refers to coherent systems of human relations, technical objects, and cybernetic processes that inhere to large, complex infrastructures. Social society, and its constituent substructures, qualify as complex sociotechnical systems.

In the context of systems science and systems philosophy, systemics is an initiative to study systems. It is an attempt at developing logical, mathematical, engineering and philosophical paradigms and frameworks in which physical, technological, biological, social, cognitive and metaphysical systems can be studied and modeled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Science and technology studies</span> Academic field

Science and technology studies (STS) or science, technology, and society is an interdisciplinary field that examines the creation, development, and consequences of science and technology in their historical, cultural, and social contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Community informatics</span>

Community informatics (CI) is an interdisciplinary field that is concerned with using information and communication technology (ICT) to empower members of communities and support their social, cultural, and economic development. Community informatics may contribute to enhancing democracy, supporting the development of social capital, and building well connected communities; moreover, it is probable that such similar actions may let people experience new positive social change. In community informatics, there are several considerations which are the social context, shared values, distinct processes that are taken by members in a community, and social and technical systems. It is formally located as an academic discipline within a variety of academic faculties including information science, information systems, computer science, planning, development studies, and library science among others and draws on insights on community development from a range of backgrounds and disciplines. It is an interdisciplinary approach interested in using ICTs for different forms of community action, as distinct from pure academic study about ICT effects.

Situated cognition is a theory that posits that knowing is inseparable from doing by arguing that all knowledge is situated in activity bound to social, cultural and physical contexts.

Human-centered computing (HCC) studies the design, development, and deployment of mixed-initiative human-computer systems. It is emerged from the convergence of multiple disciplines that are concerned both with understanding human beings and with the design of computational artifacts. Human-centered computing is closely related to human-computer interaction and information science. Human-centered computing is usually concerned with systems and practices of technology use while human-computer interaction is more focused on ergonomics and the usability of computing artifacts and information science is focused on practices surrounding the collection, manipulation, and use of information.

The Social Study of Information Systems (SSIS) is interested in people developing and using technology and the "culture" of those people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Dourish</span> British-American computer scientist

Paul Dourish is a computer scientist best known for his work and research at the intersection of computer science and social science. Born in Scotland, he holds the Steckler Endowed Chair of Information and Computer Science at the University of California, Irvine, where he joined the faculty in 2000, and where he directs the Steckler Center for Responsible, Ethical, and Accessible Technology. He is a Fellow of the AAAS, the ACM, and the BCS, and is a two-time winner of the ACM CSCW "Lasting Impact" award, in 2016 and 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Technology dynamics</span> Scientific field

Technology dynamics is broad and relatively new scientific field that has been developed in the framework of the postwar science and technology studies field. It studies the process of technological change. Under the field of Technology Dynamics the process of technological change is explained by taking into account influences from "internal factors" as well as from "external factors". Internal factors relate technological change to unsolved technical problems and the established modes of solving technological problems and external factors relate it to various (changing) characteristics of the social environment, in which a particular technology is embedded.

Rob Kling was a North American professor of information systems and information science at the School of Library and Information Science (SLIS) and adjunct professor of computer science, Indiana University, United States. He directed the interdisciplinary Center for Social Informatics (CSI), at Indiana University. He is considered to have been a key founder of social analyses of computing and a leading expert on the study of social informatics.

The term Engineering Informatics may be related to information engineering, computer engineering, or computational engineering, among other meanings. This word is used with different context in different countries. In general, some people assume that the central area of interest in informatics is information processing within man-made artificial (engineering) systems, called also computational or computer systems. The focus on artificial systems separates informatics from psychology and cognitive science, which focus on information processing within natural systems. However, nowadays these fields have areas where they overlap, e.g. in field of affective computing.

Informatics is the study of computational systems. According to the ACM Europe Council and Informatics Europe, informatics is synonymous with computer science and computing as a profession, in which the central notion is transformation of information. In some cases, the term "informatics" may also be used with different meanings, e.g. in the context of social computing, or in context of library science.

Pervasive informatics is the study of how information affects interactions with the built environments they occupy. The term and concept were initially introduced by Professor Kecheng Liu during a keynote speech at the SOLI 2008 international conference.

Susan Catherine Herring is an American linguist and communication scholar who researches gender differences in Internet use, and the characteristics, functions, and emergent norms associated with language, communication, and behavior in new online forms such as social media. She is Professor of Information Science and Linguistics at Indiana University Bloomington, where she founded and directs the Center for Computer-Mediated Communication. In 2013 she received the Association for Information Science & Technology Research Award for her contributions to the field of computer-mediated communication. She has been a fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University. Herring also founded and directed the BROG project.

Social determinism is the theory that social interactions alone determine individual behavior.

Technological determinism is a reductionist theory that assumes that a society's technology progresses by following its own internal logic of efficiency, while determining the development of the social structure and cultural values. The term is believed to have originated from Thorstein Veblen (1857–1929), an American sociologist and economist. The most radical technological determinist in the United States in the 20th century was most likely Clarence Ayres who was a follower of Thorstein Veblen and John Dewey. William Ogburn was also known for his radical technological determinism and his theory on cultural lag.

Urban informatics refers to the study of people creating, applying and using information and communication technology and data in the context of cities and urban environments. It sits at the conjunction of urban science, geomatics, and informatics, with an ultimate goal of creating more smart and sustainable cities. Various definitions are available, some provided in the Definitions section.

Sociomateriality is a theory built upon the intersection of technology, work and organization, that attempts to understand "the constitutive entanglement of the social and the material in everyday organizational life." It is the result of considering how human bodies, spatial arrangements, physical objects, and technologies are entangled with language, interaction, and practices in organizing. Specifically, it examines the social and material aspects of technology and organization, but also emphasizes the centrality of materials within the communicative constitution of organizations. It offers a novel way to study technology at the workplace, since it allows researchers to study the social and the material simultaneously.

Steven Burton Sawyer is a professor in the School of Information Studies at Syracuse University. He is known for his research on social and organizational informatics, how people work together and how they use technology, and the relationships among changing forms of work & organization. Sawyer has worked on improving the social components of teamwork, as well as the distinctions between packaged and custom software development. His research is done through field-based studies of software developers, scientific collaborators, scientific data repositories, real estate agents, police officers, organizational technologists, and similar information-intensive work settings.

References

  1. ↑ Kling, Rob; Rosenbaum, Howard; Sawyer, Steve (2005). Understanding and Communicating Social Informatics: A Framework for Studying and Teaching the Human Contexts of Information and Communications Technologies. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, Inc. ISBN   978-1-57387-228-7.
  2. 1 2 Kling, Rob (2007). "What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter?". The Information Society. 23 (4): 205–220. doi:10.1080/01972240701441556. S2CID   41866775.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Sawyer, Steve; Rosenbaum, Howard (2000). "Social informatics in the information sciences: Current activities and emerging directions" (PDF). Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. 3 (2): 89–95. doi: 10.28945/583 . Retrieved 15 August 2016.
  4. 1 2 Sawyer, S. and Jarrahi, M.H. (2014) The Sociotechnical Perspective: Information Systems and Information Technology, Volume 2 (Computing Handbook Set, Third Edition,) edited by Heikki Topi and Allen Tucker. Chapman and Hall/CRC. | http://sawyer.syr.edu/publications/2013/sociotechnical%20chapter.pdf
  5. ↑ Rob Kling Center for Social Informatics (2016). "Homepage of Rob Kling Center for Social Informatics". Indiana University. Rob Kling Center for Social Informatics. Retrieved 22 August 2016.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Williams, Robin; Edge, David (1996). "The social shaping of technology" (PDF). Research Policy. 25 (6): 865–899. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(96)00885-2. S2CID   17412694.
  7. 1 2 3 Fichman, Pnina; Rosenbaum, Howard (2014). Social Informatics: Past, Present and Future. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN   978-1443855761.
  8. 1 2 3 Smutny, Zdenek (2016). "Social informatics as a concept: Widening the discourse". Journal of Information Science. 42 (5): 681–710. doi:10.1177/0165551515608731. S2CID   9355999.
  9. ↑ Chugunov, Andrey Vladimirovich (2012). Социальная информатика: Учебное пособие. Санкт-Петербургский: НИУ ИТМО.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kling, Rob (2000). "Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics". The Information Society. 16 (3): 217–232. doi:10.1080/01972240050133661. S2CID   17184442.
  11. ↑ Suchman, Lucy (1994). Supporting articulation work: Aspects of a feminist practice of office technology production. Proceedings of the 5th IFIP WG9.1 Conference on Women, Work and Computerization. New York: Elsevier. pp. 7–21.
  12. ↑ Kling, Rob (2003). "A bit more to it: scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 54: 47–67. doi:10.1002/asi.10154.
  13. ↑ Marcinkowski, Michael (2016). "Data, Ideology, and the Developing Critical Program of Social Informatics" (PDF). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67 (5): 1266–1275. doi:10.1002/asi.23483. S2CID   22109515.
  14. ↑ Kling, Rob; Jewett, Tom (1994). The Social Design of Worklife with Computers and Networks: An Open Natural Systems Perspective. Vol. 39. pp. 239–293. doi:10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60381-2. ISBN   9780120121397 . Retrieved 1 September 2016.{{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  15. 1 2 Godejord, Per Arne (2007). "Fighting child pornography: Exploring didactics and student engagement in social informatics". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58 (3): 446–451. doi:10.1002/asi.20522.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.