Speech processing

This article is about electronic speech processing. For speech processing in the human brain, see Language processing in the brain.

Speech processing is the study of speech signals and the processing methods of signals. The signals are usually processed in a digital representation, so speech processing can be regarded as a special case of digital signal processing, applied to speech signals. Aspects of speech processing includes the acquisition, manipulation, storage, transfer and output of speech signals. Different speech processing tasks include speech recognition, speech synthesis, speaker diarization, speech enhancement, speaker recognition, etc. ^[1]

History

Early attempts at speech processing and recognition were primarily focused on understanding a handful of simple phonetic elements such as vowels. In 1952, three researchers at Bell Labs, Stephen. Balashek, R. Biddulph, and K. H. Davis, developed a system that could recognize digits spoken by a single speaker. ^[2] Pioneering works in field of speech recognition using analysis of its spectrum were reported in the 1940s. ^[3]

Linear predictive coding (LPC), a speech processing algorithm, was first proposed by Fumitada Itakura of Nagoya University and Shuzo Saito of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (NTT) in 1966. ^[4] Further developments in LPC technology were made by Bishnu S. Atal and Manfred R. Schroeder at Bell Labs during the 1970s. ^[4] LPC was the basis for voice-over-IP (VoIP) technology, ^[4] as well as speech synthesizer chips, such as the Texas Instruments LPC Speech Chips used in the Speak & Spell toys from 1978. ^[5]

One of the first commercially available speech recognition products was Dragon Dictate, released in 1990. In 1992, technology developed by Lawrence Rabiner and others at Bell Labs was used by AT&T in their Voice Recognition Call Processing service to route calls without a human operator. By this point, the vocabulary of these systems was larger than the average human vocabulary. ^[6]

By the early 2000s, the dominant speech processing strategy started to shift away from Hidden Markov Models towards more modern neural networks and deep learning.^{[ citation needed ]}

Techniques

Dynamic time warping

Main article: Dynamic time warping

Dynamic time warping (DTW) is an algorithm for measuring similarity between two temporal sequences, which may vary in speed. In general, DTW is a method that calculates an optimal match between two given sequences (e.g. time series) with certain restriction and rules. The optimal match is denoted by the match that satisfies all the restrictions and the rules and that has the minimal cost, where the cost is computed as the sum of absolute differences, for each matched pair of indices, between their values.^{[ citation needed ]}

Hidden Markov models

Main article: Hidden Markov model

A hidden Markov model can be represented as the simplest dynamic Bayesian network. The goal of the algorithm is to estimate a hidden variable x(t) given a list of observations y(t). By applying the Markov property, the conditional probability distribution of the hidden variable x(t) at time t, given the values of the hidden variable x at all times, depends only on the value of the hidden variable x(t − 1). Similarly, the value of the observed variable y(t) only depends on the value of the hidden variable x(t) (both at time t).^{[ citation needed ]}

Artificial neural networks

Main article: Artificial neural network

An artificial neural network (ANN) is based on a collection of connected units or nodes called artificial neurons, which loosely model the neurons in a biological brain. Each connection, like the synapses in a biological brain, can transmit a signal from one artificial neuron to another. An artificial neuron that receives a signal can process it and then signal additional artificial neurons connected to it. In common ANN implementations, the signal at a connection between artificial neurons is a real number, and the output of each artificial neuron is computed by some non-linear function of the sum of its inputs.^{[ citation needed ]}

Phase-aware processing

Phase is usually supposed to be random uniform variable and thus useless. This is due wrapping of phase: ^[7] result of arctangent function is not continuous due to periodical jumps on ${\displaystyle 2\pi }$. After phase unwrapping (see, ^[8] Chapter 2.3; Instantaneous phase and frequency), it can be expressed as: ^{[7] [9]} ${\displaystyle \phi (h,l)=\phi _{lin}(h,l)+\Psi (h,l)}$, where ${\displaystyle \phi _{lin}(h,l)=\omega _{0}(l'){}_{\Delta }t}$ is linear phase (${\displaystyle {}_{\Delta }t}$ is temporal shift at each frame of analysis), ${\displaystyle \Psi (h,l)}$ is phase contribution of the vocal tract and phase source. ^[9] Obtained phase estimations can be used for noise reduction: temporal smoothing of instantaneous phase ^[10] and its derivatives by time (instantaneous frequency) and frequency (group delay), ^[11] smoothing of phase across frequency. ^[11] Joined amplitude and phase estimators can recover speech more accurately basing on assumption of von Mises distribution of phase. ^[9]

Applications

• Interactive Voice Systems
• Virtual Assistants
• Voice Identification
• Emotion Recognition
• Call Center Automation
• Robotics

See also

• Computational audiology
• Neurocomputational speech processing
• Speech coding
• Speech technology
• Natural Language Processing

References

1. Sahidullah, Md; Patino, Jose; Cornell, Samuele; Yin, Ruiking; Sivasankaran, Sunit; Bredin, Herve; Korshunov, Pavel; Brutti, Alessio; Serizel, Romain; Vincent, Emmanuel; Evans, Nicholas; Marcel, Sebastien; Squartini, Stefano; Barras, Claude (2019-11-06). "The Speed Submission to DIHARD II: Contributions & Lessons Learned". arXiv: 1911.02388 [eess.AS].
2. Juang, B.-H.; Rabiner, L.R. (2006), "Speech Recognition, Automatic: History", Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Elsevier, pp. 806–819, doi:10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/00906-8, ISBN   9780080448541
3. Myasnikov, L. L.; Myasnikova, Ye. N. (1970). Automatic recognition of sound pattern (in Russian). Leningrad: Energiya.
4. Gray, Robert M. (2010). "A History of Realtime Digital Speech on Packet Networks: Part II of Linear Predictive Coding and the Internet Protocol" (PDF). Found. Trends Signal Process. 3 (4): 203–303. doi: 10.1561/2000000036 . ISSN   1932-8346.
5. "VC&G - VC&G Interview: 30 Years Later, Richard Wiggins Talks Speak & Spell Development".
6. Huang, Xuedong; Baker, James; Reddy, Raj (2014-01-01). "A historical perspective of speech recognition". Communications of the ACM. 57 (1): 94–103. doi:10.1145/2500887. ISSN   0001-0782. S2CID   6175701.
7. Mowlaee, Pejman; Kulmer, Josef (August 2015). "Phase Estimation in Single-Channel Speech Enhancement: Limits-Potential". IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing. 23 (8): 1283–1294. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2015.2430820. ISSN   2329-9290. S2CID   13058142 . Retrieved 2017-12-03.
8. Mowlaee, Pejman; Kulmer, Josef; Stahl, Johannes; Mayer, Florian (2017). Single channel phase-aware signal processing in speech communication: theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN   978-1-119-23882-9.
9. Kulmer, Josef; Mowlaee, Pejman (April 2015). "Harmonic phase estimation in single-channel speech enhancement using von Mises distribution and prior SNR". Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE. pp. 5063–5067.
10. Kulmer, Josef; Mowlaee, Pejman (May 2015). "Phase Estimation in Single Channel Speech Enhancement Using Phase Decomposition". IEEE Signal Processing Letters. 22 (5): 598–602. doi:10.1109/LSP.2014.2365040. ISSN   1070-9908. S2CID   15503015 . Retrieved 2017-12-03.
11. Mowlaee, Pejman; Saeidi, Rahim; Stylianou, Yannis (July 2016). "Advances in phase-aware signal processing in speech communication". Speech Communication. 81: 1–29. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2016.04.002. ISSN   0167-6393. S2CID   17409161 . Retrieved 2017-12-03.