Stephan Harbarth | |
---|---|
President of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany | |
Assumed office 22 June 2020 | |
Vice-President | |
Nominated by | CDU/CSU |
Appointed by | Bundesrat |
Preceded by | Andreas Voßkuhle |
Vice-President of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany | |
In office 30 November 2018 –22 June 2020 | |
President | |
Nominated by | CDU/CSU |
Appointed by | Bundestag |
Preceded by | Ferdinand Kirchhof |
Succeeded by | Doris König |
Judge of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany for the First Senate | |
Assumed office 30 November 2018 | |
Nominated by | CDU/CSU |
Appointed by | Bundesrat |
Preceded by | Ferdinand Kirchhof |
Member of the Bundestag for Rhein-Neckar | |
In office 27 October 2009 –30 November 2018 | |
Preceded by | Bernd Schmidbauer |
Succeeded by | Nina Warken |
Personal details | |
Born | Heidelberg,Baden-Württemberg,West Germany (now Germany) | 19 December 1971
Citizenship | German |
Political party | Christian Democratic Union (1993–) |
Children | 3 |
Alma mater | |
Stephan Harbarth (born 19 December 1971 in Heidelberg) is the President of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany (Bundesverfassungsgericht),former German lawyer and politician of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU). From 2009 until 2018 he served as member of the Bundestag. On 22 November 2018 he was elected to the Federal Constitutional Court by the Bundestag. He succeeded Ferdinand Kirchhof and serves in the court's first senate. On 23 November 2018,one day after his election to the court,he was elected Vice President of the Federal Constitutional Court by the Bundesrat. In this capacity,he is chairman of the first senate. [1]
From 1991 until 1996,Harbarth studied law at the University of Heidelberg. He received his Ph.D. in 1998,with a thesis on investor protection in public sector companies. In 2000 completed an LL.M. program at Yale Law School,on a scholarship of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).
From 2006 until 2008,Harbarth was a partner of the international law firm Shearman &Sterling in Mannheim.
Harbarth became a member of the German Bundestag in the 2009 elections. In his first term,he served on the Committee on Legal Affairs and its Subcommittee on European Law. From 2014 until 2016,he led his parliamentary group's work in the Committee on Legal Affairs and Consumer Protection. During this time,he was the group's rapporteur on the German Stock Corporation Act (AktG).
From 2016,Harbarth served as deputy chairman of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group,under the leadership of successive chairmen Volker Kauder (2016-2018) and Ralph Brinkhaus (2018). In this capacity,he coordinated the group's legislative activities on consumer protection,domestic affairs,sports,and minorities. He was also a member of the Committee on Rules of Procedure,Immunities and Institutional Affairs. In the negotiations to form a coalition government under the leadership of Chancellor Angela Merkel following the 2017 federal elections,he was part of the CDU delegation. [2]
In June 2017,Harbarth voted against Germany's introduction of same-sex marriage. [3]
Harbarth lives in Mühlhausen. [4]
The election of Harbarth as Federal Constitutional Judge is subject to constant criticism because he used to be a successful business lawyer who may have serious conflicts of interests,but in turn this criticism is waved away by his supporters,who naturally view it critically. Aled Wyn Griffiths,editor-in-chief of JUVE Verlag für juristische Information stated his "honest amazement" [5] that a discussion about Harbart's eligibility for election was being held at all. If there were conflicts of interest,according to Griffiths,"[t]he key to this is (...) a definition of bias and conflicts of interest that is so strict and clear that judges know when they should hand in a case. Griffiths added:"If these questions were asked of a member of the Supreme Court in the UK or the US,the reaction would be one of honest amazement. Every British judge was once a practising lawyer. Every member of the Supreme Court there,the Courts of Appeal,literally every single court,has represented special interests of clients in their earlier careers." However,in the United States,at one point in time,a judge at the U.S. Supreme Court,Abe Fortas,who was previously a lawyer in a large law firm,had to resign after a failed election to the presidency of the court because of fees that cast doubt on his independence. By resigning,Fortas forestalled an impeachment. [6]
Harbarth himself sees the criticism as unjustified.
In public,accusations are made that it is not comprehensible in terms of the amount of work involved,how Harbarth could have earned so much money with his legal work during his time as a member of the Bundestag. "So what did Harbarth get his high remuneration for",asked the German newspaper Handelsblatt [7] Either Harbarth had almost not taken up his mandate as a member of parliament in view of the amount of work invoiced,or had invoiced services as a lawyer without carrying out a corresponding lawyer's activity. [8] The latter would be a violation of §44a paragraph 2 sentence 3 of the German Member of Parliament Act ("Abgeordnetengesetz" - AbgG):"Furthermore,the acceptance of money or monetary benefits is inadmissible if this benefit is granted without appropriate consideration by the member of the Bundestag" [9] The Bundestag administration has taken these accusations seriously and examined them. The report is not public. Harbarth has never commented on these accusations and has never denied them.
In 2019,two members of the German Parliament filed an action for a declaratory judgment with the Federal Constitutional Court,seeking a declaratory judgment that the election and appointment of Harbarth as a judge of the Federal Constitutional Court was null and void:BVerfG,decision of 2 July 2019 - 2 BvE 4/19. [10] The core of the applicants' argumentation was,according to the summary of the Federal Constitutional Court in the reasons for its decision:"Irrespective of this,there is a deliberate violation of the provision of §44a of the AbgG that is laid down by simple statute,because the respondent in the second place did not disclose that the Vice-President of the Federal Constitutional Court,in his time as a Member of Parliament,had received substantial,probably overwhelming,property allocations from third,unsettled sources. In view of numerous unclarified detailed questions regarding the income of the Member of Parliament from his former activity as a lawyer,during which he had also been a member of the board of directors and managing director of the law firm,there was a presumption of an inadmissible conflict of interest that was incompatible with the free mandate of a Member of Parliament. He had therefore disregarded Paragraphs 44a and 44b of the AbgG;at the same time,the information which he had provided in an obviously concealing manner had not been verified by the respondent in the second place and had therefore been deliberately mispublished. According to the complainant,this infringed Article 38.1 sentence 2 of the Basic Law,which guarantees a comprehensive right of the Members of Parliament to ask questions,to be informed and to receive information. The untruthful information and the deficiencies in disclosure also led to a violation of Article 97.1 of the Basic Law and the principle of democracy. Since the election,the determination of the election result and the appointment were infected by it,all measures were null and void. (Decision of 2 July 2019 - 2 BvE 4/19,margin no. 10). In the reporting of the legal specialist press,the dismissal of the accusations was received positively,since the accusations were "obviously speculative and made in the open without any external cause". [11]
In the German legal literature the judgement has been received with critical approval. Nevertheless,the leading German constitutional legal scholar Michael Sachs was "irritated that [the court] has taken it for granted that the influence of deliberate misinformation or failure to inform is subsumed under the concept of coercion." [12] Whether the Federal Constitutional Court had at the time of its decision the files of the Bundestag administration with their audit report on Harbarth and §44 a AbgG at hand is unknown.
Werner Rügemer pointed out,inter alia,that the infamous cum-ex transactions had been concocted in Harbarth's former law firm,and had been 'brought to legal maturity' there,while Harbarth worked there. [13] At the same time,the cum ex mastermind Hanno Berger was active in Harbarth's law firm. Other media also reported that Harbarth worked in a big law firm where the Cum-Ex tax models were first invented. [14]
On November 28,2019,a lawyer from the law firm Dr. Stoll &Sauer filed a constitutional complaint against Harbarth's appointment as Federal Constitutional Court Judge on behalf of participants in the test case (MFK) in the emissions scandal against Volkswagen AG. There is concern that the automotive industry and the related industrial complex,such as suppliers,will be given the opportunity to influence the courts in their favor. In addition,he said,there was an unresolved issue of additional annual income in the millions from his time as a member of the Bundestag. On 18 February 2020 (Ref. 2 BvR 2088/19),the Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the complaint. The law firm announced that it would consider taking the case to the European Court of Human Rights.
In an interview with the Augsburger Allgemeine,Harbarth rejected the accusation of bias. In Spiegel,Harbarth had already said in January 2019 that one "could not 'wish for a lawyer to be elected to the Federal Constitutional Court' and then 'consider it fundamentally problematic that this lawyer also had clients'".
The German Bundesrat is a legislative body that represents the sixteen Länder of Germany at the federal level. The Bundesrat meets at the former Prussian House of Lords in Berlin. Its second seat is located in the former West German capital of Bonn.
Overhang seats are constituency seats won in an election under the traditional mixed-member proportional (MMP) system,when a party's share of the nationwide votes would entitle it to fewer seats than the number of individual constituencies won. The electoral reform in Germany removed the overhang seats,and replaced with Zweitstimmendeckung.
Peter Aloysius Müller is a German politician belonging to the Christian Democratic Union (CDU). From 1999 to 2011,he has held the position of Premier (Ministerpräsident) of the state of Saarland,serving as President of the Bundesrat in 2008/09. In December 2011,Müller was elected as judge of German Bundesverfassungsgericht.
Helmut Brandt is a German politician,member of the CDU,and Legal Counsel (Justiziar) for the CDU/CSU Parliamentary Group. He has been a member of the Bundestag since 28 June 2005,when he replaced Karl-Josef Laumann,who had been appointed a minister in North Rhine-Westphalia. Brandt,a lawyer by training specialising in criminal law,was mayor of Alsdorf in North Rhine-Westphalia from 1994 to 1999,having been a councillor there since 1978.
Jan-Marco Luczak is a German lawyer and a politician of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) who has been serving as a member of the German Bundestag since 2009,representing the Berlin-Tempelhof-Schöneberg constituency until 2021,and as a party list member since.
The Federal Constitutional Court is the supreme constitutional court for the Federal Republic of Germany,established by the constitution or Basic Law of Germany. Since its inception with the beginning of the post-World War II republic,the court has been located in the city of Karlsruhe,which is also the seat of the Federal Court of Justice.
Michael Grosse-Brömer is a German lawyer and politician of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) who has been serving as a member of the Bundestag since 2002.
Transgender rights in the Federal Republic of Germany are regulated by the Transsexuellengesetz since 1980,and indirectly affected by other laws like the Abstammungsrecht. The law initially required transgender people to undergo sex-reassignment surgery in order to have key identity documents changed. This has since been declared unconstitutional. The German government has pledged to replace the Transsexuellengesetz with the Selbstbestimmungsgesetz,which would remove the financial and bureaucratic hurdles necessary for legal gender and name changes. Discrimination protections on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation vary across Germany,but discrimination in employment and the provision of goods and services is in principle banned countrywide.
Till Steffen is a German lawyer and politician of Alliance 90/The Greens who has been serving as a member of the German Bundestag since the 2021 elections,representing the Hamburg-Eimsbüttel district.
Ingve Björn Stjerna is a German lawyer,known for having filed in 2017 a constitutional complaint with the German Federal Constitutional Court against the ratification of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court in Germany. In April 2017,his complaint led the German Constitutional Court to ask the President of Germany to suspend the ratification of the Agreement. His complaint,which was assigned court case reference 2 BvR 739/17,was upheld by the Court.
Marco Buschmann is a German lawyer and politician of the Free Democratic Party (FDP) who has been serving as Federal Minister of Justice in Chancellor Olaf Scholz's cabinet since 2021. He has served as a member of the Bundestag from the state of North Rhine-Westphalia from 2009 to 2013 and again since 2017.
Florian Toncar is a German lawyer and politician of the Free Democratic Party (FDP) who has been serving as Parliamentary State Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Finance in the coalition government of Chancellor Olaf Scholz since 2021. He has served as a member of the Bundestag from the state of Baden-Württemberg from 2005 until 2013 and since 2017.
Thomas Heilmann is a German politician of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU). Born in Dortmund,North Rhine-Westphalia,he has served as a member of the Bundestag from the state of Berlin since 2017.
Ansgar Guido Karl Johannes Heveling is a German lawyer and politician of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) who has been serving as a member of the Bundestag from the state of North Rhine-Westphalia since 2009.
Günter Krings is a German lawyer and politician of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) who has been serving as a member of the Bundestag from the state of North Rhine-Westphalia since 2002.
Nina Warken is a German lawyer and politician of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) who has been serving as a member of the Bundestag from the state of Baden-Württemberg since 2013.
2 BvR 739/17 is a case decided on 13 February 2020 by the German Federal Constitutional Court in which the Court decided that the Act of Approval,i.e. for the ratification,of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court of 19 February 2013 (EPGÜ-ZustG) in Germany was null and void,because it had not been approved by the German federal parliament sitting with the required quorum.
Ute Granold is a German politician and member of the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU). She was a member of the German Bundestag from 2002 to 2013,where she was most recently the chairwoman of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Committee on Human Rights and Humanitarian Aid.
Lobbying in Germany,as in many other parliamentary democracies,plays a significant role in the development of legislation. Lobbying has existed in Germany since 1956,when the Federal Constitutional Court issued a ruling legalizing it. A mandatory lobby register was introduced in Germany effective 1 January 2022,along with a code of conduct.
Hans-Joachim Jentsch was a German lawyer and politician (CDU). He was a member of the German Bundestag from 1976 to 1982,mayor of Wiesbaden –the capital of Hesse –from 1982 to 1985,a member of the Landtag of Hesse from 1987 to 1990,minister of justice in Thuringia from 1990 to 1994,and a justice of the Federal Constitutional Court from 1996 to 2005.
In 2000 he joined the large law firm Shearman & Sterling LLP. His time there falls into the years, when the Cum-Ex models are also being worked out there. To plunder the state. ("2000 steigt er bei der Großkanzlei Shearman & Sterling LLP ein. Seine Zeit dort fällt in die Jahre, als auch dort die Cum-Ex-Modelle ausgetüftelt werden. Um den Staat auszuplündern.")