The Holocaust in the Netherlands

Last updated
Monument at Westerbork: Each stone represents one person who was detained at Westerbork prior to being murdered in a Nazi camp Westerbork-monument1.jpg
Monument at Westerbork: Each stone represents one person who was detained at Westerbork prior to being murdered in a Nazi camp

The Holocaust in the Netherlands was organized by Nazi Germany in occupied Netherlands as part of the Holocaust across Europe during the Second World War. The Nazi occupation in 1940 immediately began disrupting the norms of Dutch society, separating Dutch Jews in multiple ways from the general Dutch population. The Nazis used existing Dutch civil administration as well as the Dutch Jewish Council "as an invaluable means to their end". [1]

Contents

Some 75% of the Dutch-Jewish population was killed in the Holocaust, an unusually high percentage compared to other occupied countries in western Europe. [2] [3] [4] There is debate among scholars about the extent to which the Dutch public was aware of the Holocaust. Postwar Netherlands has grappled with constructing the historical memory of the Holocaust and created monuments memorialising this chapter of Dutch history. The Dutch National Holocaust Museum opened in March 2024. [5]

Background

Yellow Star of David that Dutch Jews were forced to wear Dutch Jewish star.jpg
Yellow Star of David that Dutch Jews were forced to wear
Jewish woman wearing a yellow Star of David during the razzia of 20 June 1943 [nl] Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R99538, Niederlande, Frau mit Judenstern.jpg
Jewish woman wearing a yellow Star of David during the razzia of 20 June 1943  [ nl ]

Jews began settling in the Netherlands from the 17th century, where they benefited from the Dutch tradition of religious tolerance, especially in Amsterdam. In 1796 and 1834, Jewish emancipation laws granted full citizenship to Dutch Jews. From the late nineteenth century until the 1930s, Dutch Jews became increasingly secularised and integrated into Dutch society. Many no longer observed Jewish religious or cultural practices or lived in Jewish communities. While Dutch society formed segments or "pillars" in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the Jews were not a separate pillar, but rather tended to be affiliated with existing pillars.

At first, it was widely believed that Jews were so deeply integrated into Dutch culture that they wouldn’t be threatened as in other places. The Netherlands had been a destination for German refugees, both Jewish and non-Jewish, fleeing the Nazi regime—most famously the family of Anne Frank. But Dutch Jews did not likewise flee The Netherlands upon the Nazi invasion.

Whereas the German occupiers attempted friendly relations with the general Dutch population, they specifically targeted Jews with elimination. The response of the Jewish leadership in the Netherlands was to "pursue a policy of compromise [with the occupation] that was more Dutch than Jewish, thereby co-operating reluctantly in successive small steps (in the hopes of avoiding 'a worse fate'... [T]he segmented Dutch society regarded the problems of the Jews as a Jewish matter (barring a few exceptions)." [6]

Occupation

Germans arrest Jews in the Jonas Daniel Meijerplein in Amsterdam, February 1941 Duitse razzia op het Jonas Daniel Meijerplein te Amsterdam.jpg
Germans arrest Jews in the Jonas Daniel Meijerplein in Amsterdam, February 1941

The neutrality of the Netherlands did not protect it from the Nazi invasion of May 1940. Over the next two years, the German occupiers worked with the existing Dutch bureaucracy to gain control of the administrative system to implement its own policy aims. A key aim was to separate Dutch Jews from their legal protections and Dutch cultural milieu, extinguishing first their rights and then their lives. [7] Rather than leaving the Dutch government independent or setting up a military occupation, the Nazis' plan for the Netherlands involved implementing a civil occupation. [8] :70 Leaders appointed by the Germans to head the civil administration of the Netherlands were all Nazis with a strong ideological history. Hitler's representative, the Austrian Nazi Arthur Seyss-Inquart, quickly took command of the Dutch administrative system as the Reichskommissar for the occupied Dutch territories. [8] :70 Hanns Albin Rauter was appointed the Higher SS and Police Chief (HSSPF). Rauter reported directly to Heinrich Himmler. [9] :57 One of Rauter's first initiatives involved consolidating the Dutch police under the Nazi-controlled Ministry of Justice. Rauter positioned the SS and the police to have full authority over the entire Jewish population of the occupied Netherlands. [9] :21 This gave the SS and the police the ability to persecute Jews in the Netherlands, and eventually implement the Final Solution. [8] :71 Rauter had not only the Dutch police, but 4,700 German police personnel at his disposal. [9] :66 After Germany took control of the Dutch government, 128 cases of suicide by Jews were reported. [10] :300

Registration

Lodewijk Ernst Visser, President of the Dutch Supreme Court from 1939 to 1941, was forced to resign by the Nazi occupying forces because he was a Jew. Dr. Lodewijk Ernst Visser, president van de Hoge Raad.png
Lodewijk Ernst Visser, President of the Dutch Supreme Court from 1939 to 1941, was forced to resign by the Nazi occupying forces because he was a Jew.

German authorities issued a series of increasingly strict regulations to isolate and exclude Jews from the general Dutch population, a key factor in the policies leading to the genocide. Dutch Jews overwhelmingly complied with registration.

Immediately after occupation in May 1940, all businesses directed by a Jew or owned in whole or part by Jews (including Jewish shareholders) were required to register with the government. The relevant law defined a Jew as any person who had three or more Jewish grandparents; who had two Jewish grandparents and belonged to a Jewish congregation; or who was married to a Jew. As Jacob Presser commented, "registration had come to mean compulsory submission of a complete personal history." [11]

In October 1940, Dutch authorities required all civil servants to sign a “Declaration of Aryan Descent” that neither they, their spouse, nor their parents or grandparents were “part of the Jewish faith.” The following month, summary dismissals of Jewish public servants began, including Lodewijk Visser  [ nl ], president of the Dutch Supreme Court. [12] :16–17 Over 2,500 Jews lost their public positions. [10] :302 Only the forced removal of Dutch Jews from secondary and higher education incited a response from the public. [10] :303

On 10 January 1941, Seyss-Inquart mandated the registration of all Jewish citizens [13] : 610 and expanded the definition of a Jew, with one Jewish grandparent sufficing. Despite sporadic refusals, about 160,000 registered, receiving a black “J” stamp in their identity cards. [13] : 610 These cards—required to be carried at all times—were nearly impossible to forge, and a useful tool for the perpetrator to distinguish who was Jewish. Similarly, the birth, death, and marriage records of Jews in the Netherlands were marked to distinguish them from the non-Jewish citizenry. [10] :304 From 5 May 1942, Jews were forced to wear a yellow star on their clothing. [13] : 615

The geography of the Netherlands made it impossible for Jews to flee. The country of Holland is less than 20,000 square miles of flatlands. [8] :71 During the civil occupation, it is estimated that 25,000 Jews in the Netherlands went into hiding. Of these 25,000, a third were caught and deported. Of those who survived, 4,000 were young children. [8] :72 Some were betrayed by friends, or strangers who agreed to hide them under false pretenses. Others were caught by the police. [8] :72

Expropriation and Theft

Jews packed up for deportation with solely with the possessions they could carry Groep bepakte en bezakte joden op de hoek van de Lekstraat in de Amsterdamse Rivierenbuurt.jpg
Jews packed up for deportation with solely with the possessions they could carry

Before being deported and murdered, Dutch Jews were systematically stripped of all of their properties and possessions, including businesses, real estate, financial assets, artworks and household possessions. [14] Gerard Aalders, a Dutch researcher at the Netherlands State Institute for War Documentation, estimated that the Dutch Jewish community was "the most affected by German rapacity". [15] Looting organisations included the Dienststelle Mühlmann, headed by Kajetan Mühlmann under Seyss-Inquart, and the LiRo bank, a Jewish bank called Lippmann & Rosenthal & Co. that had been taken over by Nazis to disguise theft as legal transactions, among others. [16]

Deportations

Deportations Deportatie Joden, gezinnen met bagage op een perron, de trein staat te wachten.jpg
Deportations
Dutch Jews at Mauthausen, 26 June 1941 Buchenwald Prisoners 83718.jpg
Dutch Jews at Mauthausen, 26 June 1941
Two Dutch Jews who committed suicide by touching the electric fence in Mauthausen, 1942 Two Dutch Jews who committed suicide by touching the electric fence in Mauthausen.jpg
Two Dutch Jews who committed suicide by touching the electric fence in Mauthausen, 1942

When Seyss-Inquart and Rauter gained power over the Dutch administration, there were 140,000 Jews in the country. As many as 80,000 Dutch Jews lived in Amsterdam alone. [13] : 601 The residency status of Jews in the Netherlands was irrelevant to Seyss-Inquart and Rauter. Seyss-Inquart stated "The Jews, for us, are not Dutchmen. They are those enemies with whom we can come neither to an armistice nor to a peace." [13] : 601 Rauter sent progress letters to Himmler, informing him in September 1942 that "In all of Holland some 120,000 Jews [including "mixed Jews"] are being readied for departure." [13] : 620

Below are a sample of deportations from The Netherlands to labor and extermination camps. [18]

YearNumberFromToSurvivors
1941-421700Amsterdam Mauthausen
1941-42100Amsterdam Buchenwald, Dachau, Neuengamme
15 July 1942 to 23 February 194342915 Westerbork Auschwitz 85
20 August to 8 December 19423540 ?Various labor camps181
2 March to 20 July 194334313 ? Sobibor 19
24 August 1943 to 3 September 194411985 Westerbork Auschwitz 588
15 November 1943 to 3 June 19441645 Vught Auschwitz 198
1943-444870Amsterdam and Westerbork Theresienstadt 1950
October 1943150 Westerbork Buchenwald and Ravensbrück
19443751 Westerbork Bergen-Belsen 2050

In all, 107,000 Jews were deported from prisons in Germany and the Netherlands to concentration camps. Of these, only 5,200 survived. In total 102,000 Jews were murdered by the Nazis (three-quarters of the pre-war Jewish population of the country). [19] Some were native Dutch, and others were refugees who had sought asylum in the Netherlands. [18]

Death Toll and Contributing Factors

In 1939, there were some 140,000 Jews living in the Netherlands, among them tens of thousands of refugees: some sources state 24,000–25,000 Jews had fled Germany in the 1930s, while others state that about 34,000 Jews entered The Netherlands from Germany and Austria between 1933 and 1940. [20] [8] :69

In 1945, only about 35,000 Dutch Jews were alive, many of whom emigrated to British Mandate of Palestine (present-day Israel) and other countries; the 1947 census reported only 14,346 Jews, or 10% of the pre-war population. 34,379 "full Jews" are estimated to have survived the Holocaust, of whom 8,500 were part of mixed marriages, and thus spared deportation. Another 14,545 "half Jews" and 5,990 "quarter Jews" are estimated to have survived. [21]

Several factors contributed to The Netherlands' higher death toll compared to other occupied countries. The governmental apparatus was left relatively intact after the royal family and government fled to London, and The Netherlands was not under a military regime. It was the most densely inhabited country of Western Europe, making it difficult for the relatively large number of Jews to go into hiding. Most Jews in Amsterdam were poor, which limited their options for fleeing or hiding. The country did not have much open space or forest for people to flee to. Also, the civil administration had detailed records of the numbers of Jews, and their addresses.

It is not entirely clear how much the average citizen of the Netherlands was aware of the operation of death camps for most of the Occupation. [22] All Dutch citizens were required to "register" for work in Germany. [23] Initially, Dutch society recognized German persecution of the Jews, they conducted the first act of mass civil disobedience in Nazi-occupied Europe: the Februaristaking ("February strike"), to show their support for Jewish citizens. The Nazis moved swiftly to suppress further citizen action and there was no further public action after the top Nazi official, Reichskommissar Seyss-Inquart, warned the Dutch public that there would be draconian consequences. [24]

One theory is that the Germans made use of the administrative organizations and Dutch police:

"In their preparations for the extermination of the Jews living in the Netherlands, the Germans could count on the assistance of the greater part of the Dutch administrative infrastructure. The occupiers had to employ only a relatively limited number of their own personnel; Dutch policemen rounded up the families to be sent to their deaths in Eastern Europe. Trains of the Dutch railways staffed by Dutch employees transported the Jews to camps in the Netherlands which were transit points to Auschwitz, Sobibor, and other death camps." With respect to Dutch collaboration, Eichmann is quoted as saying "The transports run so smoothly that it is a pleasure to see." [25]

This statue in Amsterdam commemorates Anne Frank, who went into hiding with her German-Jewish refugee family during the Second World War. They were found and transported. Her father survived and later published her diary. Amsterdam Anne Frank.jpg
This statue in Amsterdam commemorates Anne Frank, who went into hiding with her German-Jewish refugee family during the Second World War. They were found and transported. Her father survived and later published her diary.

The best-known of the Holocaust victims in the Netherlands is Anne Frank, a German Jewish refugee. Along with her sister, Margot Frank, she died from typhus in March 1945 in the concentration camp of Bergen-Belsen. Disease was widespread in the camps because of unsanitary living conditions deliberately created by the German occupiers. Anne Frank's mother, Edith Frank-Holländer, was murdered by starvation in Auschwitz. Her father, Otto Frank, survived the war. Other noted Dutch victims of the Holocaust include Etty Hillesum, whose writings were later published; [26] Abraham Icek Tuschinski, and Edith Stein, who converted to Christianity and is also known as Saint Teresa Benedicta of the Cross.

Maurice Frankenhuis built a collection of documents, authored diaries and collected artifacts spanning five decades, from World War I through World War II including hiding, and incarceration in Westerbork and Theresienstadt. His research revealed that he, together with his wife and two daughters may have been the only native Dutch family to survive as a unit. [27]

Postwar

Controversy about Jewish orphans

In the immediate aftermath of World War II, a controversy arose concerning the Jewish children who survived their parents during the Holocaust. The children were often hidden by the Dutch Resistance with non-Jewish families. One scholar of the controversy contends that "The history of the Jewish war orphans in the Netherlands, while part of the post war era, represents a direct continuation of the Holocaust and its prolonged aftermath of human suffering." When the Nazis began to vigorously implement deportation of Jews from the Netherlands, Jews allowed members of the Resistance to place many children with non-Jewish families; they survived the war when their parents did not. Jewish children could be more easily hidden than Jewish adults, so a disproportionate number of the Jews who survived were children. "[T]his type of rescue operation could be organized on a serious scale." How these young survivors should be considered in the postwar era created a controversy between Resistance members and Jewish adults surviving the Holocaust, who wished to rebuild the Dutch Jewish community. These two groups had different visions of the children's future; each considered themselves making better decisions for their guardianship. Resistance fighters' role in hiding children during the war earned them legal standing with the Dutch governmental commission established to determine their fate. Children were often smuggled out of Amsterdam to many other places in the Netherlands, where they were integrated into existing non-Jewish families. In the postwar period, the Dutch government established principles to consider the welfare of the children that recognized the role of the Dutch resistance. The assumptions the Commission for War Foster Children made to determine guardianship were that the parents were not returning; the status of children was equivalent to abandoned or neglected offspring, not orphans; members of the Resistance had legal standing on the commission, while Dutch Jews were invited to join the commission only as individuals, not representatives of a group. The commission did not recognize the children's being Jewish as relevant to their placement, and that their individual welfare was a Dutch matter, not a Jewish matter. For Dutch Jews, the way that the commission was conceived and functioned was as an adversary." [28] One hidden child's story is part of the permanent exhibition at the Resistance Museum in Amsterdam. Ellen Mieke Olman was separated from her parents at nine months, and fostered by a Christian family. After the war she was reunited with her biological mother, a person of whom she had no memory and subsequently had a difficult relationship. "I called my mother 'ma'am'". [29]

Historical memory and memorials

In contrast to many other countries where all aspects of Jewish communities and culture were eradicated during the Shoah, a remarkably large proportion of rabbinic records survived in Amsterdam, making the history of Dutch Jewry unusually well documented.[ citation needed ]

Stumble stones (stolpersteine) in Utrecht Israelitisch Weeshuis Utrecht 8-4-2010.JPG
Stumble stones (stolpersteine) in Utrecht

In the postwar period, Holocaust memorials were created in many places directly under Nazi control and there are now scholarly works on the holocaust in historical memory. [30] [31] The Netherlands has been part of this process of memorialization and scholarly assessment. [32] The Dutch government established National Holocaust Remembrance Day as the last Sunday in January, while a number of counytries fix the commemorations date at January 27, the anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz death camp. The Netherlands figures in comparative studies of memorialization of the Holocaust [33] [34] The changes over time of memorialization in the Netherlands has been the subject of study. [35] [36] The Resistance Museum in Amsterdam, founded in 1984 by members of the Dutch resistance, tells the complicated story of the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands and the varieties of Dutch response to the Nazis' policies resulting in the annihilation of three-quarters of Dutch Jews. The museum catalogue published a catalogue of the new permanent collection in 2023. [37]

There are various types of Holocaust memorialization including a digital archive of Dutch Holocaust victims' names. [38] The built urban environment of Dutch cities has incorporated Holocaust memorials, with a list of giving locations. In Amsterdam, Anne Frank House has become an important site of memory, one of the few that focuses on a single individual to tell a much larger story. [39] Some other sites of memory in Amsterdam have a much lower profile. [40] Scholars study Holocaust sites of commemoration in the Netherlands, examining visitors' motivations for seeking them out [41] and their emotional responses. [42]

Historical conceptions of the Holocaust in the Netherlands are dynamic, with an examination of the Dutch Resistance. [43] A study of Holocaust memorials examines the conception of the Holocaust perpetrators. [44] Holocaust aftermath memory in Dutch education is a subject of concern. [45] As the Netherlands has become a multiethnic society, scholars have examined historical memory of the Holocaust of different ethnic groups. [46] There is also scholarly work on the Holocaust in the Netherlands and conceptions of Dutch decolonization. [47]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arthur Seyss-Inquart</span> Austrian Nazi politician (1892–1946)

Arthur Seyss-Inquart was an Austrian Nazi politician who served as Chancellor of Austria in 1938 for two days before the Anschluss. His positions in Nazi Germany included deputy governor to Hans Frank in the General Government of Occupied Poland, and Reich commissioner for the German-occupied Netherlands. In the latter role, he shared responsibility for the deportation of Dutch Jews and the shooting of hostages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Netherlands in World War II</span>

Despite Dutch neutrality, Nazi Germany invaded the Netherlands on 10 May 1940 as part of Fall Gelb. On 15 May 1940, one day after the bombing of Rotterdam, the Dutch forces surrendered. The Dutch government and the royal family relocated to London. Princess Juliana and her children sought refuge in Ottawa, Canada until after the war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dutch resistance</span> Resistance movements opposed to the German occupation of the Netherlands during World War II

The Dutch resistance to the German occupation of the Netherlands during World War II can be mainly characterized as non-violent. The primary organizers were the Communist Party, churches, and independent groups. Over 300,000 people were hidden from German authorities in the autumn of 1944 by 60,000 to 200,000 illegal landlords and caretakers. These activities were tolerated knowingly by some one million people, including a few individuals among German occupiers and military.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jewish resistance in German-occupied Europe</span> Various forms of resistance conducted by Jews against Nazi occupation regimes

Jewish resistance under Nazi rule took various forms of organized underground activities conducted against German occupation regimes in Europe by Jews during World War II. According to historian Yehuda Bauer, Jewish resistance was defined as actions that were taken against all laws and actions acted by Germans. The term is particularly connected with the Holocaust and includes a multitude of different social responses by those oppressed, as well as both passive and armed resistance conducted by Jews themselves.

Eindhoven is a municipality and a city located in the province of North Brabant in the south of the Netherlands, originally at the confluence of the Dommel and Gender brooks. The Gender has been dammed off in the post-war years, but the Dommel still runs through it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hanns Albin Rauter</span> Austrian-born Higher SS and Police Leader, SS-Obergruppenführer

Johann Baptist Albin Rauter was a high-ranking Austrian-born SS functionary and war criminal during the Nazi era. He was the highest SS and Police Leader in the occupied Netherlands and therefore the leading security and police officer there during the period of 1940–1945. Rauter reported directly to the Nazi SS chief, Heinrich Himmler, and also to the Nazi governor of the Netherlands, Arthur Seyss-Inquart. After World War II, he was convicted in the Netherlands of crimes against humanity and executed by firing squad.

<i>Goodbye Holland</i> 2004 film by Willy Lindwer

Goodbye Holland is a 2004 documentary about the extermination of Dutch Jews during World War II. The film debunks the accepted notion that the Dutch were 'good' during the war, exposing how Dutch police and civil servants helped the German occupying regime implement massive deportations, which resulted in the death of 78 percent of the Jews in the Netherlands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nisko Plan</span> Cancelled Nazi deportation plan for Jews

The Nisko Plan was an operation to deport Jews to the Lublin District of the General Governorate of occupied Poland in 1939. Organized by Nazi Germany, the plan was cancelled in early 1940.

<i>Reichskommissariat Niederlande</i> Administrative division of Nazi Germany in the occupied Netherlands

The Reichskommissariat Niederlande was the civilian occupation regime set up by Germany in the German-occupied Netherlands during World War II. Its full title was the Reich Commissariat for the Occupied Dutch Territories. The administration was headed by Arthur Seyss-Inquart, formerly the last chancellor of Austria before initiating its annexation by Germany.

Operation Silbertanne was the codename of a series of executions that were committed between September 1943 and September 1944 during the German occupation of the Netherlands. The executions were carried out by a death squad composed of Dutch members of the SS and Dutch veterans of the Eastern Front.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abraham Asscher</span> Dutch Jewish businessman and politician (1880 – 1950)

Abraham Asscher was a Dutch Jewish businessman from Amsterdam, a politician, and a leader of his community who attained notoriety for his role during the German occupation of the Netherlands (1940–1945).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">February strike</span> 1941 labour strike in the German-occupied Netherlands during WWII

The February strike of 1941 was a general strike in the Nazi-occupied Netherlands during World War II. It was organized by the outlawed Communist Party of the Netherlands in defence of persecuted Dutch Jews and against the anti-Jewish measures and the activities of Nazism in general.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Holocaust in Belgium</span> Systematic dispossession, deportation, and murder of Jews

The Holocaust in Belgium was the systematic dispossession, deportation, and murder of Jews and Roma in German-occupied Belgium during World War II. Out of about 66,000 Jews in the country in May 1940, around 28,000 were murdered during the Holocaust.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hendrik Koot</span> Dutch criminal (1898–1941)

Hendrik Evert Koot was a Dutch collaborator with the German occupying forces during World War II. A member of the WA, the paramilitary wing of the National Socialist Movement in the Netherlands (NSB), he was beaten up by members of a local knokploeg in Amsterdam on 11 February 1941. His injuries were so severe that he died a few days later. His death was seized by the German authorities to start raids in the Jodenbuurt, the Amsterdam Jewish quarters, which in turn led to the February strike. Another element of Nazi retaliation was the installation of a Judenrat in Amsterdam: the Jewish Council of Amsterdam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lippmann, Rosenthal & Co.</span>

Lippmann, Rosenthal & Co. or LiroBank originally a Dutch Jewish bank, was seized and used by Nazis for looting Jewish property during the German occupation of the Netherlands during World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wilhelm Ritterbusch</span> Nazi administrator

Wilhelm (Willi) Friedrich Adolf Ritterbusch, was a Nazi Party political functionary. Among other positions, he was the German Generalkommissar zur Besonderen Verwendung, directing the political affairs and propaganda in the occupied Netherlands from the middle of July 1943 until 7 May 1945, the end of World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Knowledge of the Holocaust in Nazi Germany and German-occupied Europe</span> To what extent the Holocaust was known contemporaneously

The question of how much Germans knew about the Holocaust whilst it was being executed is a matter of debate by historians. With regard to Nazi Germany, some historians argue that it was an open secret amongst the population. Peter Longerich argues that the Holocaust was an open secret by early 1943, but some authors place it even earlier. However, after the war, many Germans claimed that they were ignorant of the crimes perpetrated by the Nazi regime, a claim associated with the stereotypical phrase "Davon haben wir nichts gewusst".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Camp Barneveld</span> Nazi camp for Jews in the occupied Netherlands

Camp Barneveld was an internment camp consisting of two buildings for Dutch Jews near the town of Barneveld, the Netherlands during the German occupation in World War II. Dutch civil servant Karel Frederiks had made an arrangement, later called Plan Frederiks, with the occupiers to keep a small group of Dutch Jews in the Netherlands and exclude them from deportation to the labour, concentration, or extermination camps abroad. At first, in December 1942, a castle called De Schaffelaar was used to house the interned Jews. When De Schaffelaar was full, a nearby large villa called De Biezen and its barracks were added. Although the Nazis did eventually, in September 1943, deport the group of around 650 Jews from Camp Barneveld to Westerbork transit camp and then on to concentration camp Theresienstadt in Bohemia, almost all survived.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Agency for Jewish Emigration in Amsterdam</span> Nazi Agency for deportation of Jews from the Netherlands during World War II

The Central Agency for Jewish Emigration in Amsterdam was the Amsterdam branch of the Central Office for Jewish Emigration in Berlin. The office in Amsterdam organised the deportation of Jewish people from the Netherlands to Germany and Poland from 1941 to 1943.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dutch National Holocaust Museum</span> Holocaust museum in the Netherlands

The Dutch National Holocaust Museum is the first official museum on the Holocaust in the Netherlands. It is located in an historic building in the Jewish Cultural Quarter of Amsterdam, near a former child care center that played a role in rescuing Jewish children. The museum tells the story of the Holocaust through the lives of individual victimised men, women, and children. There is a floor-to-ceiling display of all the laws limiting and obliterating the rights of Jews in the Netherlands, who since the eighteenth century had been Dutch citizens with equal rights.

References

  1. Romijn, Peter, "The Experience of the Jews in the Netherlands during the German Occupation" in Dutch Jewry: Its History and Secular Culture, 1500-200. Leiden: Brill 2002, 269
  2. JCH Blom (July 1989). "The Persecution of the Jews in the Netherlands: A Comparative Western European Perspective" (PDF). European History Quarterly . 19 (3): 333–351. doi:10.1177/026569148901900302. hdl:20.500.11755/1ab16853-ae62-4a30-a677-0e0d31c6f9f5. S2CID   143977907..
  3. For more recent publications, see: Pim Griffioen and Ron Zeller, "Comparison of the Persecution of the Jews in the Netherlands, France and Belgium, 1940–1945: Similarities, Differences, Causes", in: Peter Romijn et al., The Persecution of the Jews in the Netherlands, 1940–1945. New Perspectives. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press/Vossius Pers/NIOD, 2012, 55–91. Pim Griffioen and Ron Zeller, "Anti-Jewish Policy and Organization of the Deportations in France and the Netherlands, 1940–1944: A Comparative Study", Holocaust and Genocide Studies 20 (3), Winter 2006, 437–473.
  4. Tammes, Peter (1 July 2017). "Surviving the Holocaust: Socio-demographic Differences Among Amsterdam Jews". European Journal of Population. 33 (3): 293–318. doi:10.1007/s10680-016-9403-3. ISSN   0168-6577. PMC   5493707 . PMID   28725097.
  5. National Holocaust Museum, Amsterdam accessed 9 March 2024
  6. Blom, J.C.H. "Dutch Jews, Jewish Dutchmen, and Jews in the Netherlands" in Dutch Jewry: Its History and Secular Culture, 1500-2000. Jonathan I. Israel and Reinier Salverda, eds. Leiden: Brill 2002, 215-223
  7. Romijn, Peter. "The Experience of the Jews in the Netherlands during the German Occupation" in Dutch Jewry: Its History and Secular Culture, 1500-2000. Jonathan I. Israel and Reiner Salverda. Leiden: Brill 2002, 253-271
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Steven Hess. "Disproportionate Destruction The Annihilation of the Jews in the Netherlands: 1940–1945", in The Netherlands and Nazi Genocide: Papers of the 21st Annual Scholars Conference, edited by G. Jan Colijn and Marcia S. Littell, Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press, 1992.
  9. 1 2 3 Romijn, Peter, Bart Van Der Boom, Pim Griffioen, Ron Zeller, Marieke Meeuwenoord, and Johannes Houwink Ten Cate. The Persecution of the Jews in the Netherlands, 1940–1945: New Perspectives; ed. By Wichert ten Have. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University PR, 2012.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Romijn. "The War" in The History of Jews in the Netherlands, edited by J.C.H. Bloom, R.G. Fuks-Mansfeld, and I. Schoffer, Uitgeverij Balans, 1996. Translated by The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2002. Schoffer, Uitgeverij Balans, 1996. Translated by The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2002.
  11. Presser, Jacob. Ashes in the Wind: The Destruction of Dutch Jewry. London 1965, pp. 33-36
  12. Van Iperen, Roxane (2019). The Sisters of Auschwitz. Orion Publishing. ISBN   9780063097629.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hilberg, Raul (2003). The destruction of the European Jews (3rd ed.). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  14. "SPOILS OF WAR N 3 1996". 6 March 2001. Archived from the original on 6 March 2001. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
  15. "SPOILS OF WAR N 3 1996". 6 March 2001. Archived from the original on 6 March 2001. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
  16. Aalders, Gerard (2004). Nazi looting : the plunder of Dutch Jewry during the Second World War. Berg. ISBN   1-85973-722-6. OCLC   53223516.
  17. Stein, Harry (2007). Buchenwald memorial (ed.). Konzentrationslager Buchenwald 1937-1945. Begleitband zur ständigen historischen Ausstellung (in German) (5th ed.). Göttingen: Wallstein-Verlag. pp. 81–83. ISBN   978-3-89244-222-6.
  18. 1 2 Gerhard Hirschfeld, "Niederlande", in Dimension des Völkermords: Die Zahl der jüdischen Opfer des Nationalsozialismus, ed. Wolfgang Benz (Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1991), 165.
  19. Latest holocaust memorial September 20.2021
  20. Voolen, Edward van. "Askhenazi Jews in Amsterdam" (PDF). Joods Historisch Museum. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 September 2007.
  21. DEMOS March 2001. Accessed 18 July 2007(in Dutch) Archived 10 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  22. Van der Boom, Bart. "'The Auschwitz reservation": Dutch Victims and Bystanders and their Knowledge of the Holocaust". Holocaust and Genocide Studies (2017) 31(3) 385-407.
  23. Ettie Huizing, Wie het geweten heeft, het levensverhaal van Siep Adema, SUN 1994, ISBN   90-6168-425-0
  24. Romijn, Peter, "The Experience of the Jews in the Netherlands During the Nazi Occupation" in Dutch Jewry: Its History and Secular Culture, 1500-2000. Leiden: Brill 2002, 260-61.
  25. Manfred Gerstenfeld (1999-08-15). "Wartime and Postwar Dutch Attitudes Toward the Jews: Myth and Truth". Jcpa.org. Retrieved 2012-05-01.
  26. Frank, Evelyne. Avec Etty Hillesum : Dans la quête du bonheur, un chemin inattendu. Une lecture d'une vie bouleversée et des lettres de Westerbork, Genève: Labor et Fides, 2002. ( ISBN   978-2830910476)
  27. Hill, David (2017). "Maurice Frankenhuis Built a Collection to Remember". American Numismatic Society Magazine. 16 (3): 44.
  28. Fishman, J.S. "The War Orphan Controversy in the Netherlands: Majority-Minority Relations" in Dutch Jewish History, Jozeph Michman, ed. Jerusalem: The Institute for Research on Dutch Jewry 1984, 421-432
  29. Dutch Resistance Museum, The Netherlands during the Second World War, 152
  30. Marcuse, Harold. "Holocaust memorials: The emergence of a genre." The American Historical Review 115.1 (2010): 53-89.
  31. Hartmann, Rudi. "Holocaust memorials without Holocaust survivors: the management of museums and memorials to victims of Nazi Germany in 21st century Europe." Horror and human tragedy revisited: The management of sites of atrocities for tourism (2005): 89-107.
  32. Boas, Henriëtte. "Commemorating the Holocaust in Holland: positive and negative aspects." Dutch Jewish History 2 (1989): 309-321.
  33. Lagrou, Pieter. "Victims of genocide and national memory: Belgium, France and the Netherlands 1945-1965." Past & present 154 (1997): 181-222.
  34. Milton, Sybil. In fitting memory: The art and politics of Holocaust memorials. Wayne State University Press, 2018.
  35. Niederhausen, Leah. "Representations of a Nation? Comparing the Dutch 1956 National Monument and the 2021 National Holocaust Monument of Names." Can. J. of Netherlandic Studies/Rev. can. d’études néerlandaises 42 (2022): 53-76.
  36. Cahen, Joël J. "Holocaust Memory Memorials and the Visual Arts in the Netherlands: From Early Public Monuments to Contemporary Artists." European Judaism 56.1 (2023): 102-118.
  37. Dutch Resistance Museum, The Netherlands during the Second World War in One Hundred Stories. Amsterdam 2023 ISBN   9789071944192
  38. Faro, Laurie MC. "The Digital Monument to the Jewish Community in the Netherlands: a meaningful, ritual place for commemoration." New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 21.1-2 (2015): 165-184.
  39. Hartmann, Rudi. "Anne Frank: The commemoration of individual experiences of the Holocaust." Journalism and Mass Communication 6.9 (2016): 542-554.
  40. Duindam, David. Fragments of the Holocaust: The Amsterdam Hollandsche Schouwburg as a Site of Memory. Amsterdam University Press, 2019.
  41. Isaac, Rami K., et al. "Understanding Dutch visitors’ motivations to concentration camp memorials." Current Issues in Tourism 22.7 (2019): 747-762.
  42. Jeroen Nawijn, Rami Khalil Isaac, Konstantin Gridnevskiy & Adriaan van Liempt (2018) Holocaust concentration camp memorial sites: an exploratory study into expected emotional response, Current Issues in Tourism, 21:2, 175-190, DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2015.1058343
  43. Contreras, Jazmine. "We were all in the resistance": Historical Memory of the Holocaust and Second World War in the Netherlands". Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota (2020).
  44. van Es, Eva Britt. "The Representation of Perpetrators in the Netherlands: A Case Study of Dutch Memorial Museums about the Second World War." (2023)
  45. Boone, Angela. "The Continuing Knowledge Gap in Holocaust Aftermath Education in the Netherlands." Holocaust Education Revisited: Wahrnehmung und Vermittlung• Fiktion und Fakten• Medialität und Digitalität (2019): 109-122.
  46. Knoops, R. V. Who Cares? Differences in the valuation of Holocaust memorial sites between ethnic groups in Groningen. Diss. 2013.
  47. Van Ooijen, Iris, and Ilse Raaijmakers. "Competitive or multidirectional memory? The interaction between postwar and postcolonial memory in the Netherlands." Colonial Counterinsurgency and Mass Violence. Routledge, 2018. 308-328.

Further reading