A trail difficulty rating system, also known as walking track grading system, walk gradings or trail grades, is a classification system for trails or walking paths based on their relative technical and physical difficulty. [1] A trail difficulty rating system informs visitors about the attributes of walking tracks and helps visitors, particularly those who are not usual bushwalkers, make decisions to walk on trails that suit their skill level, manage their risk, improve their experience and assist in the planning of trails and trail systems. [2]
The grading system features a recognizable criteria for visitors, so they can tell the difficulty of a certain walk, thereby allowing the walkers to determine whether they have the physical ability to attempt the walk. The width, length and surface of the trail are important factors to determine the grading, in addition to natural obstacles such as rocks, ridges, holes, logs and drop-offs. The grading system is based on the physical attributes that are present during the course and the challenges, rather than the effort and fitness that is necessary by the walker. [3] Trail length is not a standard of the system. Rather, trail distance should be posted on signs in addition to the difficulty symbol. [4]
Australia's trail rating system (AWTGS) evaluates a path's difficulty level based on various criteria, such as: experience needed, steps, slopes, path quality and signage. The system features five grades, which are usually displayed at national parks or state parks: [5] [a]
Tasmania has its own walking track classification system: [6]
Canada features four grades for walking trails, although some provinces may have their own system. Here is the standard grading system: [7]
Montreal features five levels: [8]
Ireland has a set of five classifications for trails: [9]
New Zealand national parks features four grades: [b]
Switzerland has two trail difficulty scales [11] (not including mountaineering), maintained by the Swiss Hiking Association (SWW) and the Swiss Alpine Club (SAC). Marked trails (as well as the official trail maps) usually carry the markings from the Swiss Hiking Association. In addition to the hiking difficulty scale, the Swiss Alpine Club also publishes the Alpine Grade Scale, focused on mountaineering routes.
SAC Scale | SWW Markings | Description |
---|---|---|
T1 | Yellow | "Well-constructed footpath. Where possible, all exposed areas are made secure with fixed cables, railings, etc. The risk of falling can largely be ruled out with normal behavior." |
T2 | White-red-white | "Continuous established footpath. Exposed areas made more secure. Partially steep terrain. Risk of falling not ruled out." |
T3 | "Path not always obvious / visible. The more exposedareas can be secured. You may need your hands for balance. Some exposed areas remain, where there is a risk of falling. Pathless sections over scree or talus." | |
T4 | White-blue-white | "Occasionally pathless. In certain places you’ll need to use your hands. Some quite exposed terrain, e.g. steep grass slopes, rock ledges, simple firn fields and minor glacier passages (with little crevasse risk)." |
T5 | "Often pathless. Individual easy climbing secitons. Exposed, challenging terrain, steep cliffs. Bare glaciers and firn slopes which posed some risk of falling." | |
T6 | Usually unmarked | "Mostly pathless. Grade II scrambling. Often very exposed. Terrain examples: Dangerous talus slopes, rock gullies, steeper sections of snow-free glaciers = increased risk of falling." |
The United Kingdom has three grades in their classification system, which are: [12] [c]
Arizona's trail ratings are as follows: [13]
In California, there are three different ratings according to the California Department of Parks & Recreation: [14]
IMBA Trail Difficulty Rating System:
Variations on the above system may include:
In New Zealand, the Department of Conservation (New Zealand) uses six grades in the national parks, which are based upon those created by the Kennett Brothers [18] .
Trails in the UK are often managed by Forestry England who use an updated version of the CTC off-road trail grades since July 2023 [19] .
Grading | Level of difficulty | Description |
---|---|---|
Green | Easy | "Relatively flat, wide and smooth trails. Gentle climbs, descents, rollers and berms, with easy to avoid features such as rocks and potholes. Surface might be loose, uneven or muddy at times." |
Blue | Moderate | "A mixture of climbs and descents with moderate gradients, technical features like tree roots and rock steps; jumps and berms. Rollable features at controlled speed. Variable surfaces." |
Red | Difficult | "A mixture of steep climbs, descents and / or avoidable features. Larger jumps, berms and rollable features at controlled speed. Technical features such as tree roots, drop-offs and large rocks. Very variable surfaces." |
Black | Severe | "Long, steep climbs, descents and jumps. Numerous hazards including drop-offs, sharp corners and difficult features. Rapid rate of surface change. Commitment required." |
Double-black | Extreme | "Very fast and steep descents. Large drop-offs, jumps and unavoidable obstacles that require high levels of skill and commitment. Extreme level of exposure or risk. Rapid rate of surface change." |
Australian National Four-Wheel Drive Council (ANFWDC), supported by Four-Wheel Drive QLD (FWDQLD) [20] :
DSMRA Grading System:
South Australia horse trail difficulty rating system: