Trail difficulty rating system

Last updated
A trailhead signage that shows the grade of a walking path at a park in Sydney, Australia. Walking trail grade sign.jpg
A trailhead signage that shows the grade of a walking path at a park in Sydney, Australia.

A trail difficulty rating system, also known as walking track grading system, walk gradings or trail grades, is a classification system for trails or walking paths based on their relative technical and physical difficulty. [1] A trail difficulty rating system informs visitors about the attributes of walking tracks and helps visitors, particularly those who are not usual bushwalkers, make decisions to walk on trails that suit their skill level, manage their risk, improve their experience and assist in the planning of trails and trail systems. [2]

Contents

The grading system features a recognizable criteria for visitors, so they can tell the difficulty of a certain walk, thereby allowing the walkers to determine whether they have the physical ability to attempt the walk. The width, length and surface of the trail are important factors to determine the grading, in addition to natural obstacles such as rocks, ridges, holes, logs and drop-offs. The grading system is based on the physical attributes that are present during the course and the challenges, rather than the effort and fitness that is necessary by the walker. [3] Trail length is not a standard of the system. Rather, trail distance should be posted on signs in addition to the difficulty symbol. [4]

On Foot

Australia

Flat or even walking paths are easy for walkers and would have disability access. Walking path in Fao (6).jpg
Flat or even walking paths are easy for walkers and would have disability access.
A hilly walking path usually has a moderate grade in the rating systems Vegetacion de Bosque Tropical en Costa Rica 031.jpg
A hilly walking path usually has a moderate grade in the rating systems
Mountain hiking usually has a difficult rating due to the physical challenges needed. Adventurous Mountain Hikes (Unsplash).jpg
Mountain hiking usually has a difficult rating due to the physical challenges needed.

Australia's trail rating system (AWTGS) evaluates a path's difficulty level based on various criteria, such as: experience needed, steps, slopes, path quality and signage. The system features five grades, which are usually displayed at national parks or state parks: [5] [a]

Tasmania

Tasmania has its own walking track classification system: [6]

  • T1 – Easy to Moderate: "Well defined and wide tracks on easy to moderate terrain, in slightly modified natural environments."
  • T2 – Moderate: "Narrower but distinct tracks which can be muddy in some places, in pristine natural environments."
  • T3 – Challenging: "You will experience marked but often-indistinct tracks, in very remote and wild areas. These challenging walks need a high level of fitness and some hiking experience."
  • T4 – Difficult: "Tracks are often faint or unmarked in remote and craggy natural areas."

Canada

Canada features four grades for walking trails, although some provinces may have their own system. Here is the standard grading system: [7]

Montreal

Montreal features five levels: [8]

Ireland

Ireland has a set of five classifications for trails: [9]

New Zealand

New Zealand national parks features four grades: [b]

Switzerland

Switzerland has two trail difficulty scales [11] (not including mountaineering), maintained by the Swiss Hiking Association (SWW) and the Swiss Alpine Club (SAC). Marked trails (as well as the official trail maps) usually carry the markings from the Swiss Hiking Association. In addition to the hiking difficulty scale, the Swiss Alpine Club also publishes the Alpine Grade Scale, focused on mountaineering routes.

Swiss Hiking Trail Difficulty Classification
SAC ScaleSWW MarkingsDescription
T1Yellow"Well-constructed footpath. Where possible, all exposed areas are made secure with fixed cables, railings, etc. The risk of falling can largely be ruled out with normal behavior."
T2White-red-white"Continuous established footpath. Exposed areas made more secure. Partially steep terrain. Risk of falling not ruled out."
T3"Path not always obvious / visible. The more exposedareas can be secured. You may need your hands for balance. Some exposed areas remain, where there is a risk of falling. Pathless sections over scree or talus."
T4White-blue-white"Occasionally pathless. In certain places you’ll need to use your hands. Some quite exposed terrain, e.g. steep grass slopes, rock ledges, simple firn fields and minor glacier passages (with little crevasse risk)."
T5"Often pathless. Individual easy climbing secitons. Exposed, challenging terrain, steep cliffs. Bare glaciers and firn slopes which posed some risk of falling."
T6Usually unmarked"Mostly pathless. Grade II scrambling. Often very exposed. Terrain examples: Dangerous talus slopes, rock gullies, steeper sections of snow-free glaciers = increased risk of falling."

United Kingdom

A Swiss hiking trail signpost at Grosse Scheidegg, showing markings for different difficulties Swiss hiking trail sign post at Grosse Scheidegg.jpg
A Swiss hiking trail signpost at Grosse Scheidegg, showing markings for different difficulties

The United Kingdom has three grades in their classification system, which are: [12] [c]

United States

Arizona

Arizona's trail ratings are as follows: [13]

  • Easiest"Paved Accessible Trail. Paved or hard and smooth."
  • Easy"Mostly smooth and wide. Dirt with occasional unevenness."
  • Moderate"Mostly smooth, variable width. Dirt with occasional unevenness."
  • Moderate Difficult"Mostly uneven surfaces. Dirt and rock."
  • Difficult"Long rocky segments with possible drops and exposure. Dirt and loose rock with continual unevenness."
  • Extremely Difficult"Long rocky segments with possible drops and exposure. Dirt and loose rock with continual unevenness."

California

In California, there are three different ratings according to the California Department of Parks & Recreation: [14]

  • Easy: "1-2 miles with easy terrain and little elevation gain."
  • Moderate: "2-4 miles with moderate terrain and some elevation change."
  • Challenging: "4 or more miles OR varying terrain."

Bicycle

International

IMBA Trail Difficulty Rating System:

Variations on the above system may include:

New Zealand

In New Zealand, the Department of Conservation (New Zealand) uses six grades in the national parks, which are based upon those created by the Kennett Brothers [18] .

Mountain biking track grades in New Zealand
GradingLevel of difficultyDescription
Grade 1 NZ Mountain Bike Trail Rating Symbol Easiest Grade 1.gif Easiest"Fairly flat, wide, smooth track or gravel road."
Grade 2 NZ Mountain Bike Trail Rating Symbol Easiest Grade 2.gif Easy"Mostly flat with some gentle climbs on smooth track with easily avoidable obstacles such as rocks and potholes."
Grade 3 NZ Mountain Bike Trail Rating Symbol Easiest Grade 3.gif Intermediate"Steep slopes and/or avoidable obstacles possibly on narrow track and/or with poor traction. There may be exposure at the track’s outside edge."
Grade 4 NZ Mountain Bike Trail Rating Symbol Easiest Grade 4.gif Advanced"A mixture of long, steep climbs, narrow track, poor traction and obstacles that are difficult to avoid or jump over. Generally exposed at the track’s outside edge. Most riders will find some sections easier to walk."
Grade 5 NZ Mountain Bike Trail Rating Symbol Easiest Grade 5.gif Expert"Technically challenging. Giant climbs, narrow track and numerous hazards including dangerous drop-offs, sharp corners and difficult obstacles. Expect walking and possibly bike carrying."
Grade 6 NZ Mountain Bike Trail Rating Symbol Easiest Grade 6.gif Extreme"Downhill/free ride specific tracks. Extremely steep sections with large drop-offs and other unavoidable obstacles. May include man made structures and jumps."

United Kingdom

Trails in the UK are often managed by Forestry England who use an updated version of the CTC off-road trail grades since July 2023 [19] .

Mountain biking track grades in the UK
GradingLevel of difficultyDescription
GreenEasy"Relatively flat, wide and smooth trails. Gentle climbs, descents, rollers and berms, with easy to avoid features such as rocks and potholes. Surface might be loose, uneven or muddy at times."
BlueModerate"A mixture of climbs and descents with moderate gradients, technical features like tree roots and rock steps; jumps and berms. Rollable features at controlled speed. Variable surfaces."
RedDifficult"A mixture of steep climbs, descents and / or avoidable features. Larger jumps, berms and rollable features at controlled speed. Technical features such as tree roots, drop-offs and large rocks. Very variable surfaces."
BlackSevere"Long, steep climbs, descents and jumps. Numerous hazards including drop-offs, sharp corners and difficult features. Rapid rate of surface change. Commitment required."
Double-blackExtreme"Very fast and steep descents. Large drop-offs, jumps and unavoidable obstacles that require high levels of skill and commitment. Extreme level of exposure or risk. Rapid rate of surface change."

Car

Australia

Australian National Four-Wheel Drive Council (ANFWDC), supported by Four-Wheel Drive QLD (FWDQLD) [20] :

Motorcycle

Australia

DSMRA Grading System:

Equestrian

Australia

South Australia horse trail difficulty rating system:

See also

Notes

  1. Australian urban parks generally do not have a grading system for the walking paths therein. Regional parks tend to have their own grading scheme designated by the local council.
  2. Some regional parks in New Zealand may have their own grading system, usually differing or altering from the official system.
  3. Some areas or regions in the United Kingdom may have a different trailing grading system for their parkland's walking trails.

References

  1. "Trail Difficulty Rating System" (PDF). auscyling. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
  2. "Trail Difficulty Rating System". IMBA National. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  3. "IMBA - Australia Trail Difficulty Rating System" (PDF). ccmbc. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
  4. "Australian Walking Trek Grading System". Australian Hiker. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  5. "Australian Walking Track Grading System". NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service . Retrieved July 25, 2023.
  6. "Walking Tour Gradings". Tasmanian Wilderness Experiences. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  7. "Trail ratings guide". Parks Canada . Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  8. "Trail Difficulty Ratings". Randonnee Aventure. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  9. "Classification and Grading for Recreational Trails" (PDF). National Trails Office, Irish Sports Counci. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  10. "Walking track categories". Department of Conservation . Retrieved July 26, 2023. Creative Commons by small.svg  This article incorporates textfrom this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
  11. "Grading systems". Swiss Alpine Club SAC. Retrieved 2025-08-13.
  12. "Trail Grades". British Walking Federation. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  13. "Trail Ratings & Etiquette". Maricopa County Parks & Recreation. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  14. "Trail Difficulty Ratings". California Department of Parks & Recreation. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
  15. "Trail Difficulty Rating System | IMBA". www.imba.com. Retrieved 2025-08-10.
  16. "IMBA Trail Difficulty Rating System in detail".
  17. "MTB Trail Gradings – Bicycle Queensland" . Retrieved 2025-08-10.
  18. https://www.doc.govt.nz/parks-and-recreation/things-to-do/mountain-biking/track-grades/
  19. https://www.forestryengland.uk/article/changes-cycle-trail-grading
  20. "About Us Four Wheel Drive Queensland". www.4wdqld.com.au. Retrieved 2025-08-10.
  21. "Off Road Grading Codes". www.mackaylandroverclub.com. Retrieved 2025-08-10.
  22. "ADV & Enduro Rides - Explore Australia's Best Trails | DSMRA". www.dsmra.org.au. Retrieved 2025-08-10.
  23. "Ride Grading". The Motorcycle Council of NSW Inc. - Recreational Trail Bike Riders Sub-Committee. Retrieved 2025-08-10.
  24. "South Australia horse trail classifications" (PDF).