University of Bristol admissions controversy

Last updated

Then Commission for Racial Equality head Trevor Phillips criticised the rejection of his daughter who attended the independent Westminster School. Flickr - boellstiftung - Trevor Phillips.jpg
Then Commission for Racial Equality head Trevor Phillips criticised the rejection of his daughter who attended the independent Westminster School.

The University of Bristol admissions controversy refers to a historic dispute over the admissions process for the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom which occurred in 2003. [2] The 2003 incident was caused by concerns over bias in the admissions system that were perceived as favouritism towards state school students [n 1] after the rejection of some students with strong academic records [3] who attended private schools. [n 2] The university's widening participation policy allowed the awarding of slightly lower offers to promising applicants from schools with lower academic achievement. Controversy surrounding this policy resulted in a brief boycott of the university by some independent schools and intense media debate about the fairness of the admissions policy as well as praise and criticism of the policy and the boycott from politicians, student leaders and education groups. The boycott was lifted after two months when the Independent School's Council expressed satisfaction with the fairness of the admissions system. [4] Two years later a survey of independent schools concluded that: "It is likely that rejections which may have seemed discriminatory to parents and schools have in fact, been due to a large rise in suitably qualified applicants" [5] and independent evidence was compiled suggesting that claims of bias were wildly exaggerated. [6] The controversy has now been superseded by the reality that all British universities have active "widening participation" policies designed to increase university applications from lower-achieving schools which tend, de facto, to be state schools.

Contents

Context

Widening participation is a government policy in the United Kingdom which attempts to widen access to higher education by increasing numbers of under-represented groups including ethnic minorities, disabled people and those from lower income families. Widening participation is a strategic aim of the Higher Education Funding Council for England, [7] the body which allocates funding to universities. The Bristol admissions dispute is one of two policial controversies over widening participation that occurred during the 2000s. In 2000 the Laura Spence Affair involved the rejection of a state school student who applied to study medicine at Oxford University and resulted in similar debate about widening participation. [8] Bristol University first introduced a widening participation scheme in 1999 after the Dearing Report, [9] a report which gave recommendations to the government on the expansion and funding of the British higher education system. Bristol's policy was in part a result of this report as well as being a principled attempt by the university to attract applications from state schools, something Bristol has traditionally struggled to do. [10] [11]

The aims of the 1999 Participation Strategy were to:

The university's widening participation policy was reviewed in 2001 when a report called The Way Forward set out how the university could meet HEFCE participation targets. [12] Under the access initiative each UCAS application [n 3] to Bristol was examined centrally before being passed to University Departments. Applications from schools where the average A-level grades were less than CCC were "flagged-up" to alert tutors to disadvantage. [9] Bristol's state intake increased from 49.3% in 1998 to 60% in 2003 under the scheme. [13]

Bristol has been described as "one of the most competitive universities to get into". [14] At the time of the controversy the university had the third highest private school intake (only Oxbridge was higher [15] ) with only 57% of students coming from state school backgrounds. [16] This has led some to label it elitist. [14] In 2003 it was reported that the university has 39,000 applicants for its 3,300 undergraduate places each year. [3] In 2002 Bristol had 2,000 students were hunting 100 places in history, and 1,500 students of English chasing only 47 places, leading The Guardian to argue that many well qualified students would be disappointed. [17]

Boycott

Accusations of bias were first made in 2002 when the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference stated that the admissions procedures for Bristol, Durham, London School of Economics, Manchester, UCL and Edinburgh should be examined for bias. [18]

The boycott of the university was announced on 4 March 2003 [19] by the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference and the Girls' Schools Association who expressed concern that the admissions policy could lead to the "apparently arbitrary rejection of well-qualified candidates". [20]

In a joint statement they said:

In these circumstances, we must send a clear message to Bristol. We cannot recommend to our colleagues that they should encourage young people to apply to Bristol until such time as the university can assure us that its procedures are fully documented, fair, objective, transparent and consistently applied. [21]

However, as it is students who decide which Universities to apply to it was not possible for private schools to prevent their students from applying to Bristol, the "boycott" amounted to discouraging their students applying there. [22] The Telegraph described an academic boycott of this kind as "unprecedented". [23] Among the rejected candidates cited as evidence of bias was Rudi Singh a student at King Edward's School. Singh was rejected from Bristol yet accepted to the University of Cambridge. [3] Four students with 10A*s at GCSE and 4 As at A-level were rejected. Two had attended Bedford School. [3] One student, Mark Smith, gained 9 A*s at GCSE and was predicted 3 As at A-level yet had his application rejected. [24] Sushila Phillips, a student at Westminster School, was rejected from Bristol despite gaining a mark of 296 out of 300 in AS level English. [25] Phillips later stated that she did not believe that she had been rejected because she attended Westminster School and that it was important that Bristol had control over its admissions system. [26]

Reaction

University of Bristol

The university denied any discrimination in the admissions process but reserved the right to take the educational background of students into account when assessing their A-level grades. [27] In a written response to the Independent Schools Council, Vice-Chancellor Eric Thomas stated that the university did not operate a quota system for students from any particular school or social background:

The university does not practice unfair discrimination, it [Bristol] does not operate quotas and it will continue to recruit exceptionally able students from all backgrounds through a selection process that is as fair and straightforward as we can make it. Pupils, not schools, make the decisions about which universities to apply to and we are confident that they will continue to want to study at Bristol. [28]

The university highlighted the fact that it is one of the most popular in the country with over 39,000 students for 3,000 places in 2002. [27] In History, English, Economics and Law competition is so fierce that over 30 students can be competing for one place. [28] In English there were 47 places and 1500 applicants of whom 500 had a perfect A-level score of AAA at A2, meaning that many top candidates were rejected. [29]

Eric Thomas also emphasised the work the university was doing to "reach out" beyond the middle-classes. In a BBC interview he stated:

a huge raft of initiatives have been implemented. Things like summer schools in which we bring students to the university during the summer to see it, we have relationships with local schools and further education colleges. [16]

The University of Bristol stated that it is against any kind of discrimination in the admissions process [30] and that the policy of making lower offers to exceptional students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds was not to satisfy the government or gain funding:

There is no question of the University attempting to widen participation in order to gain Government cash. Bristol agreed its widening participation strategy in 1998 - long before widening participation became part of Government policy. Work in this field is resource-intensive and funding from the Government helps to cover the costs. The University is not motivated by money but by the desire to recruit the best students and by the recognition that if it is to act fairly and avoid missing out on some of the most able people, it must have regard to factors in addition to predicted A-level grades. [28]

Newspapers reported that the admissions controversy created tensions between state and private school pupils at the university. Gus Glover a candidate who lost that year's University of Bristol Union presidential election attributed his loss to supporting the admissions policy. [31] However, residents of Wills Hall wrote letters to the newspaper defending the hall against accusations of classism. [32]

Head teachers

The National Association of Head Teachers, a trade union which represents head teachers in the United Kingdom [33] stated that the "HMC and GSA are guilty of gesture politics of the worst kind... They are merely shooting themselves in the foot by pursuing a boycott". [21]

Media commentators

The Daily Express criticised the admissions policies in their headlines. [17] The Daily Express stated "More students being turned down for being middle class". [17]

The then-head of the Commission for Racial Equality Trevor Phillips expressed surprise that his daughter had been rejected. In The Times he stated "Though I have no disagreement with greater access, I would have hoped universities and the government would have a slightly more sophisticated policy than simply 'blacklisting' independent schools". [34]

Politicians

Prime Minister Tony Blair commented on the controversy, stating that university should grant places on the basis of merit rather than class. [35] He added that he wanted to see more working-class people in higher education [36] but was forced to backtrack from comments made by Margaret Hodge which argued that Universities such as Bristol should be set formal targets for widening access. [36]

Charles Clarke, then the Education Secretary, described independent school criticisms as "ill-informed brouhaha". [37] He also stated that it would be inappropriate for government to become too involved in university admissions. [38] The then Shadow Education Secretary Damian Green accused the government of trying to "fiddle admissions for political ends". [39] Liberal Democrat MP Phil Willis said that "social engineering is coming ahead of merit and the development of talent." [36]

Sir Howard Newby chief-executive of the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), the university funding body argued that Bristol's admissions policies were fair and accused sections of the media of becoming involved in a "moral panic" over positive discrimination. [40]

Resolution

The controversy resulted in applications to Bristol falling for the first time in a decade in the 2004/05 admissions cycle. [41] Application numbers fell by 5% although Bristol downplayed this attributing the decrease to random fluctuations in the level of applications. [42] [43] The boycott ended on 29 April 2003 when the chairman of the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference expressed satisfaction with the admissions policy for Bristol. [4] In response to the controversy the university introduced a new, more transparent admissions policy. [44] In 2005, the Independent Schools Council published a report which cleared Bristol of bias. [5] [45] [46] [47] The report surveyed applications by 20,000 private school pupils and found that in 60 of 300 courses surveyed 98% of private school pupils were offered a place. [47]

Subsequent developments

YearState intake (%)
2002/363.8
2003/465.2
2004/564.1
2005/665.1
2006/763.1
2007/861.5
2008/0961.5
2009/1060.9
2010/1160.2 [48]
2011/1259.9 [48]

In 2009 Bristol rejected giving a "head start" to applicants to disadvantaged backgrounds as part of a scheme proposed by Lord Mandelson. [49] Statistics available from the Higher Education Statistics Agency published in 2008 show that Bristol's state intake stood at 63.1% a decrease from 65.1% the previous year. [50] Data from 2009/2010 shows Bristol's intake from state schools and colleges to be 60.0% [51] an identical figure to 2003 when the controversy over admissions occurred. [52]

In 2012 the university introduced a points based admissions system whereby poorer students “will be given an automatic weighting to their total academic score”. [53] During the 2012/13 admissions cycle all undergraduate courses used some form of contextual data but the university has refused to state exactly how their scoring system works. [53]

In 2013 the head of the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference Chris Ramsay said that independent schools could consider a repeat of the 2003 'boycott' if access agreements agreed by the Office for Fair Access led to systematic discrimination against applicants from independent schools.

“We can influence [universities’] behaviour by advising good students to go or not to go to them, and that’s obviously something that I suspect is very relevant to them...There was a period just under a decade ago where we in independent schools advised students not to apply to Bristol and they didn’t like that. It definitely had an impact. If in the end we felt that a university was systematically operating its admissions in a way which was disadvantaging the candidates for whom in the end we speak, we might say that.” [54]

Notes

  1. ↑ In the United Kingdom a state school is a government funded school which provides education free of charge to pupils. In official literature they are known as maintained schools and include a wide variety of schools including faith based schools and grammar schools. All schools which are not state schools are independent schools. See State school.
  2. ↑ In the United Kingdom a public school refers to a privately funded school funded by the payment of tuition fees. The terms "private school", "public school" and "independent school" are used fairly interchangeably to refer to fee paying school which operate free of the state although "public school" is usually reserved for the leading fee charging independent schools. In the United States the term public school refers to government funded schools. See Public school.
  3. ↑ In the United Kingdom, applicants apply to University through the Universities & Colleges Admissions Service. Offers to study may be awarded and these are either conditional on exam performance (e.g. an offer of AAA at A-level) or unconditional. If an applicant does not meet their offer then a University may reject an applicant. A University need not make the same level of offer to all applicants. See UCAS

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oxbridge</span> Universities of Oxford and Cambridge

Oxbridge is a portmanteau of Oxford and Cambridge, the two oldest, wealthiest, and most famous universities in the United Kingdom. The term is used to refer to them collectively, in contrast to other British universities, and more broadly to describe characteristics reminiscent of them, often with implications of superior social or intellectual status or elitism.

University College London, which operates as UCL, is a public research university in London, England. It is a member institution of the federal University of London, and is the second-largest university in the United Kingdom by total enrolment and the largest by postgraduate enrolment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">University of Bristol</span> Research university located in Bristol, England

The University of Bristol is a red brick Russell Group research university in Bristol, England. It received its royal charter in 1909, although it can trace its roots to a Merchant Venturers' school founded in 1595 and University College, Bristol, which had been in existence since 1876.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Private schools in the United Kingdom</span> Fee-paying school in the United Kingdom

Private schools in the United Kingdom are schools that require fees for admission and enrollment. Some have financial endowments, most are governed by a board of governors, and are owned by a mixture of corporations, trusts and private individuals. They are independent of many of the regulations and conditions that apply to state-funded schools. For example, the schools do not have to follow the National Curriculum, although many such schools do.

Education in England is overseen by the Department for Education. Local government authorities are responsible for implementing policy for public education and state-funded schools at a local level. State-funded schools may be selective grammar schools or non-selective comprehensive schools. All state schools are subject to assessment and inspection by the government department Ofsted. England also has private schools and home education; legally, parents may choose to educate their children by any suitable means.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">UCAS</span> England-based private limited company for university application processing

The Universities and Colleges Admissions Service is a charity and private limited company based in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, England, which provides educational support services. Incorporated on 27 July 1993, the company's main role is to operate the application process for British universities and colleges. The company is funded by fees charged to applicants and universities as well as advertising income; it was formed by the merger of the former university admissions system Universities Central Council on Admissions and the former polytechnics admissions system Polytechnics Central Admissions System.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comprehensive school</span> Type of school

A comprehensive school is a secondary school for pupils aged 11–16 or 11–18, that does not select its intake on the basis of academic achievement or aptitude, in contrast to a selective school system where admission is restricted on the basis of selection criteria, usually academic performance. The term is commonly used in relation to England and Wales, where comprehensive schools were introduced as state schools on an experimental basis in the 1940s and became more widespread from 1965.

University admission or college admission is the process through which students enter tertiary education at universities and colleges. Systems vary widely from country to country, and sometimes from institution to institution.

The National Admissions Test for Law, or LNAT, is an admissions aptitude test that was adopted in 2004 by eight UK university law programmes as an admissions requirement for home applicants. The test was established at the leading urgency of Oxford University as an answer to the problem facing universities trying to select from an increasingly competitive pool with similarly high A-levels. With effect from its second year, the LNAT is required for UK and overseas applicants alike. There are now nine participating law schools and hundreds of test centres worldwide.

The grammar schools debate is a debate about the advantages and disadvantages of the existence of grammar schools in the United Kingdom. Grammar schools are state schools which select their pupils on the basis of academic ability, with pupils sitting an exam in the last year of primary school to determine whether or not they gain a place. The debate on selective education has been widened by measures which allow a proportion of students to be chosen based on their "aptitude" for a particular subject.

The golden triangle is the triangle formed by the university cities of Cambridge, London, and Oxford in the south east of England in the United Kingdom. The triangle is occasionally referred to as the Loxbridge triangle, a portmanteau of London and Oxbridge or, when limited to five members, the G5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Montpelier High School, Bristol</span> Academy in Bristol, England

Montpelier High School is a girls secondary Academy, located in the Montpelier area of Bristol, England. The school building was designed by William Venn Gough and dates from 1891. It uses a polychrome mix of various Northern Renaissance styles, built in red Cattybrook brick with yellow brick and buff terracotta dressings, and has been designated by English Heritage as a grade II listed building.

The National Student Survey is an annual survey, launched in 2005, of all final year undergraduate degree students at institutions in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland within the United Kingdom. The survey is designed to assess undergraduate students' opinions of the quality of their degree programmes, with seven different scores published including an "overall satisfaction" mark.

Widening participation (WP) in higher education is a major component of government education policy in the United Kingdom and Europe. It consists of an attempt to increase not only the numbers of young people entering higher education, but also the proportion from under-represented groups.

The Laura Spence affair was a British political controversy in 2000, ignited after the failure of state school pupil Laura Spence to secure a place at the University of Oxford.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sutton Trust</span>

The Sutton Trust is an educational charity in the United Kingdom which aims to improve social mobility and address educational disadvantage. The charity was set up by educational philanthropist, Sir Peter Lampl in 1997.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liberal arts colleges in the United States</span> U.S. higher education institutions focusing on a liberal arts education

Liberal arts colleges in the United States are undergraduate institutions of higher education in the United States that focus on a liberal arts education. The Encyclopædia Britannica Concise defines liberal arts as a "college or university curriculum aimed at imparting general knowledge and developing general intellectual capacities, in contrast to a professional, vocational, or technical curriculum". Generally, a full-time, four-year course of study at a liberal arts college leads students to earning the Bachelor of Arts or the Bachelor of Science.

The General Certificate of Education (GCE) Advanced Level, or A Level, is a main school leaving qualification in England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. It is available as an alternative qualification in other countries.

The undergraduate education at the University of Oxford in England involves weekly tutorials at the colleges and halls, supported by classes, lectures and laboratory work provided by university faculties and departments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medical Schools Council</span>

The Medical Schools Council is an organisation that represents 41 medical schools and one post graduate school in the United Kingdom. The membership is made up of the heads, or deans of the medical schools. It was formerly known as the Council of Heads of Medical Schools.

References

  1. ↑ MacLeod, Donald (10 March 2003). "Bristol rebuts bias claims by CRE head". The Guardian. London.
  2. ↑ "Funding chief backs Bristol in access row |The Guardian". The Guardian. London. 5 March 2003. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  3. 1 2 3 4 "UK | Bristol denies admissions bias". BBC News. 26 February 2003. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  4. 1 2 "Private schools lift Bristol ban". The Guardian. London. 29 April 2003. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  5. 1 2 Curtis, Polly (17 August 2005). "Private schools admit no bias in university selection |The Guardian". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  6. ↑ Garner, Richard (25 March 2003). "Bias against private pupils at Bristol is 'wildly exaggerated' - Education News, Education". The Independent. London. Retrieved 25 August 2009.[ dead link ]
  7. ↑ "Widening participation". HEFCE. 2 October 2009. Archived from the original on 24 September 2010. Retrieved 19 September 2010.
  8. ↑ Hodges, Lucy (8 June 2000). "Lies, damned lies - and Laura Spence - Education News, Education". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 11 April 2008. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  9. 1 2 "Does Bristol pick the best? - Higher, Education". The Independent. London. 6 March 2003. Archived from the original on 20 November 2009. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  10. ↑ Prof Eric Thomas, Bristol University (18 January 2002). "UK | Elite uni aims to broaden its appeal". BBC News. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  11. ↑ Shepherd, Jessica (3 February 2009). "White, middle-class families dominate top university places | Education". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  12. 1 2 3 4 "University of Bristol". www.bristol.ac.uk. Retrieved 19 September 2010.[ dead link ]
  13. ↑ "Bristol 'proud' of state pupil surge". Times Higher Education. 28 February 2003. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  14. 1 2 "Elite uni aims to broaden its appeal". BBC News. 18 January 2002. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  15. ↑ Hooper, Dickon (26 June 2003). "Student hopefuls descend on Bristol". BBC News. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  16. 1 2 "Elite uni aims to broaden its appeal". BBC News. 18 January 2002. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  17. 1 2 3 "Leader: Admission charges | Politics". The Guardian. London. 4 March 2003. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  18. ↑ "Private schools claim university bias". BBC News. 30 September 2002. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  19. ↑ Rebecca Smithers, education correspondent (5 March 2003). "Private schools boycott Bristol over selection | UK news". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 19 September 2010.
  20. ↑ "Bristol faces boycott over admissions row". The Guardian. London. 4 March 2003. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  21. 1 2 Gibbes, Edward (9 March 2003). "Whose university place is it anyway?". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  22. ↑ "UK | Private schools 'boycott' Bristol". BBC News. 4 March 2003. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  23. ↑ Lightfoot, Liz (5 March 2003). "Private schools in Bristol boycott". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  24. ↑ "Bristol accused of state school bias |The Guardian". The Guardian. London. 25 February 2003. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  25. ↑ Syal, Rajeev (9 March 2003). "Race equality chairman's daughter is refused admission 'because she went to private school'". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  26. ↑ Phillips, Sushila (16 March 2003). "Trust the system". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  27. 1 2 "Bristol attacks admissions 'fallacy' |The Guardian". The Guardian. London. 4 March 2003. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  28. 1 2 3 Bristol University | News from the University | Admissions policy
  29. ↑ Fox, Adam (20 March 2003). "A silent revolution |The Guardian". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  30. ↑ "Bristol remains firm on admissions". BBC News. 23 June 2003. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  31. ↑ Hill, Amelia (9 March 2003). "Inside a university challenged". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  32. ↑ "Positive discrimination? Don't insult me". The Guardian. London. 16 March 2003. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  33. ↑ "NAHT About NAHT". Naht.org.uk. Archived from the original on 15 August 2009. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  34. ↑ MacLeod, Donald (10 March 2003). "Bristol rebuts bias claims by CRE head". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  35. ↑ Smithers, Rebecca (6 March 2003). "Clarke attacks Bristol boycott | Politics". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  36. 1 2 3 "Blair wades into university row". London Evening Standard. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  37. ↑ MacLeod, Donald (5 March 2003). "Clarke dismisses 'brouhaha' over Bristol admissions |The Guardian". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  38. ↑ MacLeod, Donald (5 March 2003). "Clarke dismisses 'brouhaha' over Bristol admissions". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  39. ↑ Gibbes, Edward (10 March 2003). "Whose university place is it anyway?". The Guardian. London.
  40. ↑ "Update: 14:25". Times Higher Education. 5 March 2003. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  41. ↑ Nikkhah, Roya (20 February 2004). "University feels pinch after boycott by schools". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  42. ↑ Nikkhah, Roya (20 February 2004). "University feels pinch after boycott by schools". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  43. ↑ "Is the Bristol boycott biting?". Studentadviser.net. 31 January 2004. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  44. ↑ Smithers, Rebecca (20 June 2003). "College to revise admissions policy | UK news". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  45. ↑ "UK | 'No bias' against private pupils". BBC News. 17 August 2005. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  46. ↑ "No bias against independent sector applicants by elite institutions, survey finds". Times Higher Education. 19 August 2005. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  47. 1 2 "Independent Private Schools - Independent Schools Council". Isc.co.uk. 17 August 2005. Archived from the original on 20 November 2008. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  48. 1 2 Paton, Graeme (21 March 2013). "Half of top universities 'cut state school admissions'". The Daily Telegraph. London.
  49. ↑ kmccormick. "Bristol University admissions | Bristol news". Thisisbristol.co.uk. Archived from the original on 9 November 2009. Retrieved 19 September 2010.
  50. ↑ Frean, Alexandra (5 June 2008). "Fewer state school students at top universities despite costly campaigns". Times. Archived from the original on 2 December 2008. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  51. ↑ Rogers, Simon (16 April 2010). "How many people from state school go to your university? |The Guardian". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 19 September 2010.
  52. ↑ "Bristol 'proud' of state pupil surge". Times Higher Education. 28 February 2003. Retrieved 19 September 2010.
  53. 1 2 Henry, Julie (5 August 2012). "Universities accused of socially engineering intakes". The Daily Telegraph. London.
  54. ↑ Paton, Graeme (1 October 2012). "Public schools threaten university boycott". The Daily Telegraph. London.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.