Weipa Dispute

Last updated
Weipa Dispute
Date13 October 1995 (1995-10-13) – 30 November 1995 (1995-11-30)
Location
Weipa, Queensland, Australia
Methods Strike action
Parties

The Weipa Dispute was a six-week-long strike and industrial dispute at the Weipa mine in Australia, from from 13 October to 30 November 1995. [1]

Contents

Background

Comalco, also known as Conzinc Riotinto of Australia (CRA), is a subsidiary of the Anglo-Australian multinational Rio Tinto corporation, one of the largest mining and metals corporations in the world. The Weipa bauxite mine, located in the town of Weipa in Far North Queensland, Australia, is owned by Comalco. [2]

In 1983, the Australian Labor Party won a majority in the Australian federal parliament, allowing it to form a government under Bob Hawke. One of the first acts of the Labor Party government would be to sign the Prices and Incomes Accord with the Australian Council of Trade Unions, in which unions agreed to reduce industrial action and their demands for higher wages, while taking on responsibility for the growth of the Australian economy. In exchange, the Labor Party government promised to increase welfare spending and to implement tax cuts. The Accord, and the Labor Party government, would last until the 1996 Australian federal election. [3] [4]

History

Prelude

In the early 1990s, Comalco and other companies in Australia began using aggressive union busting techniques, pushing for a move away from workplaces where all workers were covered under collective bargaining and towards workplaces where each worker had to negotiate their contract individually with the company. [5] At the Weipa mine, Comalco pursued a number of techniques to try and achieve de-unionisation, including offering workers an immediate pay raise for switching to a non-union contract and worsening working conditions for unionised workers. [6] Comalco also forced all newly hired workers to sign non-union contracts. [2] Once under non-union contracts, however, the miners would have less control over their schedules, would be subjected to increased monitoring by supervisors, would have any further pay raises left entirely to the company's discretion, and would be barred from seeking third party arbitration to resolve disputes, having to use an internal Comalco process instead. [5]

The introduction of non-union contracts at Weipa proved controversial, with a six-day strike being held in 1993 in protest. Attempts to resolve the dispute via the AIRC in 1994, however, backfired on the unions. [5] By 1995, only 75 of the 440 miners at the Weipa mine still belonged to a union and remained covered under collective bargaining. [7]

The early 1990s also saw disagreements between unions in Australia, including those that represented the 75 miners at Weipa, over how to resolve labour disputes, with the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union preferring a direct strike action strategy and the Australian Workers' Union preferring a legal strategy via the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC). [5]

Strike

On 13 October 1995, the 75 unionised miners voted unanimously to launch strike action. [8] Central to the unionised workers' demands was the concept of equal pay for equal work - that the company should not discriminate against unionised workers. [9]

They would subsequently set up the first picket line in Weipa's history blocking a bridge on the Mission River. [6] The striking miners then set up a further picket line using boats to block the port of Weipa after the company attempted to circumvent the picket line by ferrying non-unionised workers across the river. [10] On 8 November, miners at the Blair Athol coal mine and the Meandu Mine launched a 24-hour strike in support of the Weipa miners. [6]

On 10 November, the AIRC announced that it would allow the company to take common-law action against the striking miners. The company subsequently filed a motion with the Supreme Court of Queensland asking for an injunction against the strike. [11] Comalco also sued 49 of the striking miners, as well as four of the unions involved in the strike, for damages. [12]

On 15 November, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) and the Maritime Union of Australia announced that maritime workers across Australia would be launching a five-day sympathy strike to support the Weipa miners. The ACTU also announced that it was planning an additional seven-day sympathy strike involving all miners across the country, aiming to begin on 21 November. [13] [14]

Arbitration

On 16 November, Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating personally intervened in the dispute to try and convince the unions and Comalco to reach a deal. On 18 November, facing the prospect of a general strike, the ACTU and Comalco agreed to have the dispute submitted to binding AIRC arbitration. [15]

On 21 November, AIRC president Deirdre O'Connor announced the terms of the settlement the AIRC would impose on the two sides. The settlement included an 8% pay rise for the striking miners, back pay from 1 March 1994, as well as Comalco dropping its lawsuit against the miners. In return, the striking miners would be forced to end the strike with immediate effect. [16] In the settlement ruling, the AIRC stated that the Australian industrial relations system was "based upon collective processses as the means of providing terms and conditions of employment." [17] The AIRC further accused Comalco of attempting to "deliberately seeking to eliminate the role of the unions at the workplace through the establishment of individual staff contracts," which the AIRC called "inconsistent with the central role that registered organisations are given under the Industrial Relations Act in the prevention and settlement of industrial disputes. The Commission has a statutory obligation to encourage registered organisations." [17]

On 24 November, five of the miners taking part in the floating picket line were arrested. [18]

On 29 November, the striking miners voted not to fight the imposed settlement and to return to work on 1 December, ending the strike. [19] [20]

Reactions

Trade unions

Prominent trade unionist Bill Kelty described the Weipa Dispute in November 1995 as "a line in the sand. For us to be beaten is for the union movement to lose its heart, its soul and its purpose." [7] Australian Workers' Union Victorian secretary Bob Smith called for AWU president Bill Ludwig to resign over his handling of the dispute, particularly calling Ludwig's overseas travel during the dispute a "disgraceful act." [21]

Industry

Queensland Chamber of Mines chief executive Michael Pinnock stated that it was "worrying that the coal industry is being used as a tool in any industrial dispute because it is further affecting Australia's reputation as a reliable supplier in the face of increased overseas competition." [22] Business Council of Australia president Ian Salmon stated that "we're seeing the emergence of a form of militancy which we've been free of for a long time." [2]

Politicians

Liberal Party leader and Leader of the Opposition John Howard accused Minister for Industrial Relations Laurie Brereton of failing to act to solve the dispute, saying that "on the one hand, Mr. Brereton says that there is no need to change the law, but on the other, he is critical of CRA." [13]

Other

The Aboriginal Shire of Napranum offered support to the striking miners, with several hundred of its members signing a petition in support of the strikers and the strikers being granted permission to use land in Napranum for picketing. [2] The striking miners also received a letter of support from the Bougainville Freedom Movement, who compared the dispute to the conflict over the Panguna mine in Bougainville, also owned by Rio Tinto. [2]

Aftermath

By the end of 1996, the number of unionised workers at the Weipa mine had doubled. [23] In 1996, the newly-elected Liberal Party government of John Howard would introduce the Workplace Relations Act 1996, restricting the power of the AIRC and union activity. [24]

Analysis

Contemporary

Simon Grose of The Canberra Times described the Weipa mine as "a snapshot taken partway through the process of change which Australia's mining industry has undergone" and the dispute as "a lurch backwards, a blast of anger from the past, but it is less likely to reverse this process than it is to redefine it." [25]

Nicholas Way of the Australian Financial Review stated that Comalco's "long-term strategy has been to have all its workers on individual contracts," a strategy which "evolves from a corporate philosophy of nearly two decades, which says employees work best when their only allegiance is to the company." [26] Way also stated that the strategy's success or not depended on "weaknesses in the trade union movement," saying that "unions, to various degrees, lost touch with members at the very time CRA was training its management to reach out to them. Nowhere is this more apparent than with the AWU." [26]

Historical assessments

Peter Lewis of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation has described the Weipa Dispute as "fundamental to the development of Australian labour relations," saying that it aimed to ensure "that corporations can't actively discriminate against union members." [7]

Joel Fetter of the Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law at the University of Melbourne stated that the unions' victory in the Weipa dispute "was to be a hollow victory," saying that "CRA’s industrial relations strategy was radically successful in achieving the deunionisation of its workforce" across all of Australia in the long-run. [5]

Paddy Gorman, then editor of the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union's journal Common Cause, published a book in 1996 titled Weipa: Where Australian unions drew their 'line in the sand' with CRA about the Dispute. [27]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strike action</span> Work stoppage by employees

Strike action, also called labor strike, labour strike in British English, or simply strike, is a work stoppage caused by the mass refusal of employees to work. A strike usually takes place in response to employee grievances. Strikes became common during the Industrial Revolution, when mass labor became important in factories and mines. As striking became a more common practice, governments were often pushed to act. When government intervention occurred, it was rarely neutral or amicable. Early strikes were often deemed unlawful conspiracies or anti-competitive cartel action and many were subject to massive legal repression by state police, federal military power, and federal courts. Many Western nations legalized striking under certain conditions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1984–1985 United Kingdom miners' strike</span> Industrial action in British coal mining

The 1984–1985 United Kingdom miners' strike was a major industrial action within the British coal industry in an attempt to prevent closures of pits that the government deemed "uneconomic" in the coal industry, which had been nationalised in 1947. It was led by Arthur Scargill of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) against the National Coal Board (NCB), a government agency. Opposition to the strike was led by the Conservative government of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who wanted to reduce the power of the trade unions.

Union violence refers to violence committed by unions or union members to achieve political objectives, particularly during labor disputes. When union violence has occurred, it has frequently been in the context of industrial unrest. Violence has ranged from isolated acts by individuals to wider campaigns of organized violence aimed at furthering union goals within an industrial dispute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Weipa</span> Town in Queensland, Australia

Weipa is a coastal mining town in the local government area of Weipa Town in Queensland. It is one of the largest towns on the Cape York Peninsula. It exists because of the enormous bauxite deposits along the coast. The Port of Weipa is mainly involved in exports of bauxite. There are also shipments of live cattle from the port.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Picketing</span> Form of protest, usually labor action

Picketing is a form of protest in which people congregate outside a place of work or location where an event is taking place. Often, this is done in an attempt to dissuade others from going in, but it can also be done to draw public attention to a cause. Picketers normally endeavor to be non-violent. It can have a number of aims but is generally to put pressure on the party targeted to meet particular demands or cease operations. This pressure is achieved by harming the business through loss of customers and negative publicity, or by discouraging or preventing workers or customers from entering the site and thereby preventing the business from operating normally.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1949 Australian coal strike</span> Trade union strike in Australia

The 1949 Australian coal strike was the first time that Australian military forces were used during peacetime to break a trade union strike. The strike by 23,000 coal miners lasted for seven weeks, from 27 June 1949 to 15 August 1949, with troops being sent in by the Ben Chifley Federal Labor government to the open cut coal mines in New South Wales on 28 July 1949, with the workers returning to work, defeated, two weeks later.

The Grunwick dispute was a British industrial dispute involving trade union recognition at the Grunwick Film Processing Laboratories in Chapter Road, Dollis Hill in the London suburb of Willesden, that led to a two-year strike between 1976 and 1978.

On April 21, 1920, during a miners strike in Butte, Montana's copper mines, company guards fired on striking miners picketing near a mine of the Anaconda Copper Mining Company, killing Tom Manning and injuring sixteen others, an event known as the Anaconda Road massacre. His death went unpunished.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1929 Australian timber workers' strike</span>

The 1929 Timber Workers strike was a labour dispute in Australia caused by Justice Lukin of the Arbitration Court handing down an industrial award decision on 23 December 1928 to reduce the wages and increase the hours for 20,000 timber workers from a 44-hour week to a 48-hour week. It was the first strike in Australia after the onset of the Great Depression.

The Mudginberri abattoir was the focus of a major industrial relations dispute from 1983 to 1985 in Australia's Northern Territory which was notable for being the first successful use of legal sanctions against a union since the gaoling of Victorian Tramways union leader Clarrie O'Shea in 1969. The successful prosecution of the Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) under section 45D of the Trade Practices Act was seen by the National Farmers Federation and the developing New Right in and outside the Liberal Party of Australia as a breakthrough in a campaign to break the power of the unions and introduce contract employment.

The 1983 Arizona copper mine strike began as a labour dispute between the Phelps Dodge Corporation and a group of union copper miners and mill workers, led by the United Steelworkers. The subsequent strike lasted nearly three years and resulted in the replacement of most of the striking workers and decertification of the unions. It is regarded as an important event in the history of the United States labor movement.

The Dollar Sweets dispute in 1985 was a small industrial dispute in Australia with major legal ramifications in industrial relations where an employer resorted to a common law verdict and damages in a case in the Supreme Court of Victoria to resolve a dispute after industrial courts proved ineffective. It was the first time a trade union was forced to pay common law damages to an employer for losses suffered through picketing in Australia. The dispute was also significant for boosting the career of the barrister representing the company, Peter Costello, leading him to stand for federal Parliament and become Treasurer in the Howard Government.

The 1972 United Kingdom miners' strike was a major dispute over pay between the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) and the Conservative Edward Heath government of the United Kingdom. Miners' wages had not kept pace with those of other industrial workers since 1960. The strike began on 9 January 1972 and ended on 28 February 1972, when the miners returned to work. The strike was called by the National Executive Committee of the NUM and ended when the miners accepted an improved pay offer in a ballot. It was the first time since 1926 that British miners had been on official strike, but there had been a widespread unofficial strike in 1969.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-union violence in the United States</span>

Anti-union violence in the United States is physical force intended to harm union officials, union organizers, union members, union sympathizers, or their families. It has most commonly been used either during union organizing efforts, or during strikes. The aim most often is to prevent a union from forming, to destroy an existing union, or to reduce the effectiveness of a union or a particular strike action. If strikers prevent people or goods to enter or leave a workplace, violence may be used to allow people and goods to pass the picket line.

Union violence in the United States is physical force intended to harm employers, managers, replacement workers, union abstainers, sympathizers of the prior groups, or their families. On various occasions violence has been committed by unions or union members during labor disputes in the United States. When union violence has occurred, it has frequently been in the context of industrial unrest. Violence has ranged from isolated acts by individuals to wider campaigns of organised violence aimed at furthering union goals within an industrial dispute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lilyvale Stand Monument</span> Historic site in Queensland, Australia

Lilyvale Stand Monument is a heritage-listed memorial at Lilyvale Road, Crinum, Central Highlands Region, Queensland, Australia. It was built in 1998. It was added to the Queensland Heritage Register on 2 April 2004.

The Confectionery Workers' Union of Australia (CWUA) was an Australian trade union which existed between 1925 and 1992. Until 1986, it was known as the Federated Confectioners' Association of Australia (FCA). Throughout its existence, it represented factory workers in the confectionery industry, including a high proportion of women. It was also notable for its involvement in the landmark Dollar Sweets Dispute.

The SEQEB strike of Queensland was a dispute between the Electrical Trades Union (ETU) and SEQEB, on behalf of the government of Queensland in 1985. Electricity supply for the South East Queensland region of Australia was affected between 6 February and 7 March 1985 by labour union strikes initiated by the ETU of SEQEB. On February 11, 1985 the Queensland government led by Premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen “sacked” over 1000 linesmen and other workers for refusing to return to work after they had been ordered to do so. A State of Emergency was enacted by the government on February 7 and operated until March 7. For a fortnight some 17,000 homes in South East Queensland were without power on a rotating scheme. Many industries were forced to shut down costing the economy an estimated $1 billion. The dispute enabled the Premier to introduce a number of legislative measures to curtail future union activity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1893 United Kingdom miners' strike</span> Miners strike in Great Britain

The 1893 miners' strike was a major industrial action affecting many areas of Great Britain.

References

  1. ↑ "IRC ruling no cause for gloating". Australian Financial Review . 24 January 1996. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Aiken, Bob (11 December 1995). "Miners Strike Wins Widespread Support In Australia". The Militant . Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  3. ↑ Bull, Sue (12 December 1995). "Lessons from the Weipa struggle". Green Left . Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  4. ↑ Forsyth, Anthony (24 April 2017). "Australian politics explainer: the Prices and Incomes Accord". The Conversation. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Fetter, Joel (1 December 2002). "The Strategic Use of Individual Employment Agreements: Three Case Studies". Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  6. 1 2 3 Ross, Liz (1 January 2020). "Defending Unionism: The Weipa Dispute, 1995". Commons Social Change Library . Retrieved 13 November 2024.
  7. 1 2 3 Lewis, Peter (21 October 2015). "20 years after Weipa, the union movement must maintain that 'line in the sand'". ABC News . Retrieved 13 November 2024.
  8. ↑ Davis, Mark (23 October 1995). "80 on strike in CRA war". Australian Financial Review . Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  9. ↑ Thompson, Jennifer (21 November 1995). "Weipa workers defend union rights". Green Left . Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  10. ↑ Jackson, Carl (26 November 2015). "The Weipa strike: when 75 workers took on a mining giant". Red Flag . Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  11. ↑ Mason, Bill (14 November 1995). "Strike spreads over Comalco writs at Weipa". Green Left . Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  12. ↑ "Comalco sues Weipa workers". The Canberra Times . 11 November 1995. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  13. 1 2 Taylor, Mike (16 November 1995). "ACTU move turns heat on Brereton". The Canberra Times . Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  14. ↑ Taylor, Mike (20 November 1995). "Defiant coal unions refuse to call off strike". Canberra Times. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  15. ↑ Taylor, Mike (18 November 1995). "Weipa crisis: judge steps in". The Canberra Times . Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  16. ↑ Taylor, Mike (22 November 1995). "IRC orders Comalco to give workers 8pc more". The Canberra Times . Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  17. 1 2 Taylor, Mike (23 November 1995). "Bosses grit teeth and wait". The Canberra Times . Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  18. ↑ "Five arrested in blockade". The Canberra Times . 25 November 1995. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  19. ↑ "CRA issues threat to those still on strike". The Canberra Times . 29 November 1995. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  20. ↑ Taylor, Mike (30 November 1995). "Workers at Weipa back tomorrow". The Canberra Times . Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  21. ↑ "Time for AWU boss to resign: official". The Canberra Times . 24 November 1995. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  22. ↑ "Unions accused of using industry". The Canberra Times . 13 November 1995. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  23. ↑ Vassilopoulos, James (25 June 1997). "Union renewal at Weipa". Green Left . Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  24. ↑ Floyd, Louise Willans (1 January 1999). "Weipa and the wharves: Australian strike law" (PDF). University of Tasmanian Law Review. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  25. ↑ Grose, Simon (16 December 1995). "Don't weep for those at Weipa The life of the modern miner, although tough and hard, is not all dust, dry bread and beer". The Canberra Times . Retrieved 14 December 2024.
  26. 1 2 Way, Nicholas (27 November 1995). "Union solidarity over Weipa hides a split". Australian Financial Review . Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  27. ↑ Thompson, Jennifer (28 February 1996). "Weipa: record of a strike". Green Left . Retrieved 20 November 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.