Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972

Last updated

The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
Emblem of India.svg
Parliament of India
  • An Act to provide for the protection of Wild animals, birds and plants and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto.
Citation Act No. 53 of 1972
Enacted by Parliament of India
Enacted9 September 1972
Status: In force

The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted for protection of plants and animal species. Before 1972, India had only five designated national parks. Among other reforms, the Act established scheduled protected plant and hunting certain animal species or harvesting these species was largely outlawed. [1] The Act provides for the protection of wild animals, birds and plants; and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto. It extends to the whole of India.

Contents

It has six schedules which give varying degrees of protection. Schedule I and part II of Schedule II provide absolute protection - offences under these are prescribed the highest penalties. Species listed in Schedule III and Schedule IV are also protected, but the penalties are much lower. Animals under Schedule V, e.g. common crows, fruit bats, rats and mice, are legally considered vermin and may be hunted freely. [2] The specified endemic plants in Schedule VI are prohibited from cultivation and planting. The hunting to the Enforcement authorities have the power to compound offences under this Schedule (i.e. they impose fines on the offenders). Up to April 2010 there have been 16 convictions under this act relating to the death of tigers.

History

The "Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972" was enacted by the Parliament of India in order to conserve animals, birds, plants connected there with in 1972. [3]

Amendments

Over the years several amendments were made to the Act, which are as follows:

S. No.Short title of amending legislationNo.YearRef
1Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act,1982231982 [4]
2Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 1986281986 [5]
3Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act,1991441991 [6]
4Wild Life (Protection Amendment Act, 1993261993 [7]
5Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2002162003 [8]
6Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2006392006 [9]
7Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Bill, 20132013
8Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Bill, 20212021
9Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022182022 [10]

Definitions under the Act (Section 2)

(a) capturing, killing, poisoning, snaring, or trapping any wild animal, and every attempt to do so
(b) driving any wild animal for any of the purposes specified in sub clause
(c) injuring, destroying or taking any body part of any such animal, or in the case of wild birds or reptiles, disturbing or damaging the eggs or nests of such birds or reptiles.
(a) rugs, skins, and specimens of such animals mounted in whole or in part through a process of taxidermy
(b) antler, horn, rhinoceros horn, feather, nail, tooth, musk, eggs, and nests and shells.

Hunting (Section 9)

This section describes what constitutes hunting and the intent to hunt. Hunting wild animals is prohibited.by law in India.

Ownership (Section 40 & 42)

Regarding ownership issues and trade licences. Ownership will be not transferred to another party also regarding issues to trade licence. The certificate of ownership will be provided by the chief wild life warden.

Penalties (Section 51)

Penalties are predescribed in section 51. Enforcement can be performed by agencies such as the Forest Department, the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB), the Customs and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Chargesheets can be filed directly by the Forest Department. Other enforcement agencies, often due to the lack of technical expertise, hand over cases to the Forest Department.

2002 Amendment

The 2002 Amendment Act which came into force in January, 2003 have made punishment and penalty for offences under the Act more stringent.

Offence

For offences relating to wild animals (or their parts and products) included in schedule-I or part II of Schedule- II and those relating to hunting or altering the boundaries of a sanctuary or national park the punishment and penalty have been enhanced, the minimum imprisonment prescribed is three years which may extend to seven years, with a minimum fine of Rs. 10,000/-. For a subsequent offence of this nature, the term of imprisonment shall not be less than three years but may extend to seven years with a minimum fine of Rs. 25,000. Also a new section (51 - A) has been inserted in the Act, making certain conditions applicable while granting bail: 'When any person accused of the commission of any offence relating to Schedule I or Part II of Schedule II or offences relating to hunting inside the boundaries of National Park or Wildlife Sanctuary or altering the boundaries of such parks and sanctuaries, is arrested under the provisions of the Act, then not withstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, no such person who had been previously convicted of an offence under this Act shall be released on bail unless - [11]

(a) The Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity of opposing the release on bail; and - [11] (b) Where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the Court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offences and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail".

In order to improve the intelligence gathering in wildlife crime, the existing provision for rewarding the informers has been increased from 20% of the fine and composition money respectively to 50% in each case. In addition to this, a reward up to Rs. 10,000/- is also proposed to be given to the informants and others who provide assistance in detection of crime and apprehension of the offender.

At present, persons having ownership certificate in respect of Schedule I and Part II of Schedule II animals, can sell or gift such articles. This has been amended with a view to curb illegal trade, and thus no person can now acquire Schedule I or Part II of Schedule II animals, articles or trophies except by way of inheritance (except live elephants).

Stringent measures have also been proposed to forfeit the properties of hardcore criminals who have already been convicted in the past for heinous wildlife crimes. These provisions are similar to the provisions of 'Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985'. Provisions have also been made empowering officials to evict encroachments from Protected Areas.

Offences not pertaining to hunting of endangered species

Offences related to trade and commerce in trophies, animals articles etc. derived from certain animals (exception: chapter V A and section 38J) attracts a term of imprisonment up to three years and/or a fine up to Rs. 25,000/-. [12]

Criticism

Naturalist Peter Smetacek, member of the Kerala State Board for Wildlife (SBWL), criticised the act and its far-reaching hunting restrictions specifically as oppressive towards the rural population as well as scientists and as ineffective in achieving its goals in conservation (e.g. by creating counterproductive incentives and bringing peasants to set fire to forests in order to limit population growth of nuisance wildlife like wild boar). [13] [14] [15] [16] Smetacek further characterized the act as coming into existence in the context of the political move against the erstwhile Indian nobility (among whose traditional pastimes was hunting for thousands of years), then Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi's romanticized view of nature, and India's extensive system of licensing and regulation in the 1970s, known as the Licence Raj. [13]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hunting</span> Searching, pursuing, and killing wild animals

Hunting is the human practice of seeking, pursuing, capturing, or killing wildlife or feral animals. The most common reasons for humans to hunt are to exploit the animal's body for meat and useful animal products, for recreation/taxidermy, although it may also be done for non-exploitative reasons such as removing predators dangerous to humans or domestic animals, to eliminate pests and nuisance animals that damage crops/livestock/poultry or spread diseases, for trade/tourism, or for ecological conservation against overpopulation and invasive species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 is an Act of Parliament in the United Kingdom implemented to comply with European Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds. In short, the act gives protection to native species, controls the release of non-native species, enhances the protection of Sites of Special Scientific Interest and builds upon the rights of way rules in the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. The Act is split into 4 parts covering 74 sections; it also includes 17 schedules.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hunting Act 2004</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Hunting Act 2004 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which bans the hunting of most wild mammals with dogs in England and Wales, subject to some strictly limited exemptions; the Act does not cover the use of dogs in the process of flushing out an unidentified wild mammal, nor does it affect drag hunting, where hounds are trained to follow an artificial scent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conservation status</span> Indication of the chance of a species extinction, regardless of authority used

The conservation status of a group of organisms indicates whether the group still exists and how likely the group is to become extinct in the near future. Many factors are taken into account when assessing conservation status: not simply the number of individuals remaining, but the overall increase or decrease in the population over time, breeding success rates, and known threats. Various systems of conservation status are in use at international, multi-country, national and local levels, as well as for consumer use such as sustainable seafood advisory lists and certification. The two international systems are by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Game law</span> Regulations for hunting

Game laws are statutes which regulate the right to pursue and hunt certain kinds of wild animals and fish. The scope of game laws can include the following:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Himalayan National Park</span> National park in Himachal Pradesh, India

The Great Himalayan National Park (GHNP) is a national park in India, located in Banjar sub-division of Kullu in the state of Himachal Pradesh. The park was established in 1984 and is spread over an area of 1171 km2; elevations within the park range between 1500 and 6000 m. The Great Himalayan National Park is a habitat to numerous flora and more than 375 fauna species, including approximately 31 mammals, 181 birds, 3 reptiles, 9 amphibians, 11 annelids, 17 mollusks and 127 insects. They are protected under the strict guidelines of the Wildlife Protection Act of 1972; hence any sort of hunting is not permitted.

There are four categories of protected areas in India, constituted under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. Tiger reserves consist of areas under national parks and wildlife sanctuaries. There are 53 tiger reserves in India. As of January 2023, the protected areas of India cover 173,629.52 square kilometres (67,038.73 sq mi), roughly 5.28% of the total geographical area of the country.

Private protected areas of India refer to protected areas inside India whose land rights are owned by an individual or a corporation / organization, and where the habitat and resident species are offered some kind of protection from exploitative activities like hunting, logging, etc. The Government of India did not provide any legal or physical protection to such entities, but in an important amendment introduced by the Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act of 2002, has agreed to protect communally owned areas of ecological value.

Conservation reserves and community reserves in India are terms denoting protected areas of India which typically act as buffer zones to or connectors and migration corridors between established national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and reserved and protected forests of India. Such areas are designated as conservation areas if they are uninhabited and completely owned by the Government of India but used for subsistence by communities, and community areas if part of the lands are privately owned. Administration of such reserves would be through local people and local agencies like the gram panchayat, as in the case of communal forests.

India is home to a large variety of wildlife. It is a biodiversity hotspot with various ecosystems ranging from the Himalayas in the north to the evergreen rainforests in the south, the sands of the west to the marshy mangroves of the east. India lies within the Indomalayan realm and is home to about 7.6% of mammal, 14.7% of amphibian, 6% of bird, 6.2% of reptilian, and 6.2% of flowering plant species. India's forests contain about 500 species of mammals and more than 1300 bird species.

The Lacey Act of 1900 is a conservation law in the United States that prohibits trade in wildlife, fish, and plants that have been illegally taken, possessed, transported, or sold.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006</span> 2006 legislation in India

The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers Act, 2006, is a key piece of forest legislation passed in India on 18 December 2006. It has also been called the Forest Rights Act, the Tribal Rights Act, the Tribal Bill, and the Tribal Land Act. The law concerns the rights of forest-dwelling communities to land and other resources, denied to them over decades as a result of the continuance of colonial forest laws in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Tiger Conservation Authority</span> Indian government agency

The National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) was established in India in December 2005, following a recommendation of the Tiger Task Force. The Prime Minister of India established it to reorganise the management of Project Tiger and many Tiger Reserves in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wildlife inspector</span>

A wildlife inspector is a person empowered by law to protect wildlife.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wildlife Protection Society of India</span> Indian wildlife protection organisation

The Wildlife Protection Society of India (WPSI) was founded in 1994 by Belinda Wright, its Executive Director, who was an award-winning wildlife photographer and filmmaker till she took up the cause of conservation. From its inception, WPSI's main aim has been to bring a new focus to the daunting task of tackling India's growing wildlife crisis. It does this by providing support and information to government authorities to combat poaching and the escalating illegal wildlife trade - particularly in wild tigers. It has now broadened its focus to deal with human-animal conflicts and provide support for research projects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nilgiri Wildlife and Environment Association</span> Indian NGO

Nilgiri Wildlife and Environmental Association (NWEA) is a non-governmental organization registered in Tamil Nadu, India. Their objective is to conserve the wildlife, habitat and natural resources of the Nilgiri Hills.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act</span>

The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted in 1960 to prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering on animals and to amend the laws relating to the prevention of cruelty to animals. The act defines "animal" as 'any living creature other than a human being'.

The Concurrent List or List-III is a list of 52 items given in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. It includes the power to be considered by both the union and state government. The legislative section is divided into three lists: Union List, State List and Concurrent List. Unlike the federal governments of the United States, Switzerland or Australia, residual powers remain with the Union Government, as with the Canadian federal government.

Wildlife law in England and Wales is the law relating to the protection of wildlife in England and Wales. Much of existing UK law dates from pre-Victorian times. Wildlife was viewed as a resource to be used; phrases such as "game" or "sporting rights" appear. Public opinion is now much more in favour of protection of birds and mammals rather than the landowners’ interests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wildlife Act 1976</span>

The Wildlife Act 1976 is an Act of the Oireachtas protecting certain wildlife and flora in the Republic of Ireland. With the Wildlife (Amendment) Act 2000, it is the principal national legislation for the protection of wildlife species and habitats in Ireland.

References

  1. "WILDLIFE(PROTECTION) ACT, MINISTRY OF LAW" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 March 2018. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  2. Sinha, Samir (2010). Handbook on wildlife law enforcement in India (PDF). TRAFFIC India, WWF-India. New Delhi: Natraj Publishers. p. 117. ISBN   978-81-8158-134-1. OCLC   606355728. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 November 2020.
  3. Hussain, Zakir (19 January 2017). "Environmental legislation". The Statesman. Archived from the original on 30 November 2020. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  4. "Act 23 of 1982" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 July 2022. Retrieved 29 November 2023.
  5. "Act 28 of 1986" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 June 2023. Retrieved 29 November 2023.
  6. "Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 1991" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2020.
  7. "THE WILD LIFE (PROTECTION) AMENDMENT ACT, 1993" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 July 2022. Retrieved 29 November 2023.
  8. Government of India (20 January 2003). Union Government, Extraordinary, 2003-01-20, Part II-Section 1, Ref. 16 of 2003.
  9. "THE WILD LIFE (PROTECTION) AMENDMENT ACT, 2006 (No. 39 OF 2006)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 July 2022.
  10. "THE WILD LIFE (PROTECTION) AMENDMENT ACT, 2022 (NO. 18 OF 2022)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 May 2023.
  11. 1 2 "WILDLIFE (PROTECTION) ACT, CHAPTER VI". Archived from the original on 16 March 2018. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  12. "THE INDIAN WILDLIFE (PROTECTION) ACT, 1972". envfor.nic.in. Retrieved 26 September 2018.
  13. 1 2 Smetacek, Peter (29 December 2017). "Did a ban on hunting help India's wildlife and forests thrive, or ruin them?". DailyO. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  14. Smetacek, Peter (8 February 2019). "The biggest threats to wildlife in India: Forest fires and an 'unhealthy' plantation model". Scroll.in. Archived from the original on 30 November 2020. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  15. Archana, Ravi (20 December 2016). "Naturalist Peter Smetacek calls for dog culling". Deccan Chronicle. Archived from the original on 30 November 2020. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  16. Chhokar, Kiran Banga; Pandya, Mamata; Raghunathan, Meena (2004). Understanding Environment. New Delhi: SAGE Publications India. p. 59. ISBN   978-81-321-0190-1. OCLC   392421972.

Further reading