Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

Last updated
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
WisconsinCardSort.png
Screenshot from the PEBL computerized version of the Wisconsin Card sort
Purposemeasure frontal lobe dysfunction

The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is a neuropsychological test of set-shifting, which is the capability to show flexibility when exposed to changes in reinforcement. [1] [2] The WCST was written by David A. Grant and Esta A. Berg. The Professional Manual for the WCST was written by Robert K. Heaton, Gordon J. Chelune, Jack L. Talley, Gary G. Kay, and Glenn Curtiss.

Contents

Method

Stimulus cards are shown to the participant and the participant is then instructed to match the cards. [3] They are not given instructions on how to match the cards but are given feedback when the matches they make are right or wrong. [4] When the test was first released the method of showing the cards was done with an evaluator using paper cards with the evaluator on one side of the desk facing the participant on the other. [5] The test takes approximately 12–20 minutes to carry out using manual scoring which is greatly reduced with the aid of computer testing. [6] [7] The test results produce a number of useful psychometric scores, including numbers, percentages, and percentiles of: categories achieved, trials, errors, and perseverative errors. [8] [9]

The WCST has been shown to be reliable and valid in multiple populations including people with autism, [10] people recovering from a stroke, [11] pediatric populations, [12] and psychiatric populations. [13]

Clinical use

Since 1948, the test has been used by neuropsychologists and clinical psychologists in patients with acquired brain injury, [11] [14] [15] neurodegenerative disease, or mental illness such as schizophrenia. [13] [16] It is one of several psychological tests which can be administered to patients to measure frontal lobe dysfunction. [17] [18] When administered, the WCST allows the clinician speculate to the following frontal lobe functions: strategic planning, organized searching, utilizing environmental feedback to shift cognitive sets, directing behavior toward achieving a goal, and modulating impulsive responding. [19] [20] The test can be administered to those from 6.5 years to 89 years of age. [21] [22] The WCST, relies upon a number of cognitive functions including attention, working memory, and visual processing. [23] [24] [25] The WCST was originally developed to measure abstract reasoning [26] as such it may be used to help measure an individual's competence in abstract reasoning, and the ability to change problem-solving strategies when needed. [27] [28] In this test, a number of cards are presented to the participants. The figures on the cards differ with respect to color, quantity, and shape. [29]

Psychological tests such as the WCST, administered alone, cannot be used to measure the effects of a frontal lobe injury, or the aspects of cognitive function it may affect, such as working memory; a variety of tests must be used. [17] [30] [31] A participant may be good at one task but show dysfunction in executive function overall. Similarly, test results can be made misleading after testing the same individual over a long period of time. The participant may get better at a task, but not because of an improvement in executive cognitive function; they may have simply learned some strategies for doing this particular task that made it no longer a good measurement tool. [32] [33]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neuropsychology</span> Study of the brain related to specific psychological processes and behaviors

Neuropsychology is a branch of psychology concerned with how a person's cognition and behavior are related to the brain and the rest of the nervous system. Professionals in this branch of psychology focus on how injuries or illnesses of the brain affect cognitive and behavioral functions.

Rehabilitation of sensory and cognitive function typically involves methods for retraining neural pathways or training new neural pathways to regain or improve neurocognitive functioning that have been diminished by disease or trauma. The main objective outcome for rehabilitation is to assist in regaining physical abilities and improving performance. Three common neuropsychological problems treatable with rehabilitation are attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), concussion, and spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation research and practices are a fertile area for clinical neuropsychologists, rehabilitation psychologists, and others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neuropsychological test</span> Assess neurological function associated with certain behaviors and brain damage

Neuropsychological tests are specifically designed tasks that are used to measure a psychological function known to be linked to a particular brain structure or pathway. Tests are used for research into brain function and in a clinical setting for the diagnosis of deficits. They usually involve the systematic administration of clearly defined procedures in a formal environment. Neuropsychological tests are typically administered to a single person working with an examiner in a quiet office environment, free from distractions. As such, it can be argued that neuropsychological tests at times offer an estimate of a person's peak level of cognitive performance. Neuropsychological tests are a core component of the process of conducting neuropsychological assessment, along with personal, interpersonal and contextual factors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cognitive neuropsychology</span>

Cognitive neuropsychology is a branch of cognitive psychology that aims to understand how the structure and function of the brain relates to specific psychological processes. Cognitive psychology is the science that looks at how mental processes are responsible for the cognitive abilities to store and produce new memories, produce language, recognize people and objects, as well as our ability to reason and problem solve. Cognitive neuropsychology places a particular emphasis on studying the cognitive effects of brain injury or neurological illness with a view to inferring models of normal cognitive functioning. Evidence is based on case studies of individual brain damaged patients who show deficits in brain areas and from patients who exhibit double dissociations. Double dissociations involve two patients and two tasks. One patient is impaired at one task but normal on the other, while the other patient is normal on the first task and impaired on the other. For example, patient A would be poor at reading printed words while still being normal at understanding spoken words, while the patient B would be normal at understanding written words and be poor at understanding spoken words. Scientists can interpret this information to explain how there is a single cognitive module for word comprehension. From studies like these, researchers infer that different areas of the brain are highly specialised. Cognitive neuropsychology can be distinguished from cognitive neuroscience, which is also interested in brain-damaged patients, but is particularly focused on uncovering the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tower of London test</span> Neuropsychological test

The Tower of London test is a test used in applied clinical neuropsychology for the assessment of executive functioning specifically to detect deficits in planning, which may occur due to a variety of medical and neuropsychiatric conditions. It is related to the classic problem-solving puzzle known as the Tower of Hanoi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Executive functions</span> Cognitive processes necessary for control of behavior

In cognitive science and neuropsychology, executive functions are a set of cognitive processes that are necessary for the cognitive control of behavior: selecting and successfully monitoring behaviors that facilitate the attainment of chosen goals. Executive functions include basic cognitive processes such as attentional control, cognitive inhibition, inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Higher-order executive functions require the simultaneous use of multiple basic executive functions and include planning and fluid intelligence.

The Hayling and Brixton tests are neuropsychological tests of executive function created by psychologists Paul W. Burgess and Tim Shallice. It is composed of two tests, the Hayling Sentence Completion Test and the Brixton Spatial Awareness Test.

Hot cognition is a hypothesis on motivated reasoning in which a person's thinking is influenced by their emotional state. Put simply, hot cognition is cognition coloured by emotion. Hot cognition contrasts with cold cognition, which implies cognitive processing of information that is independent of emotional involvement. Hot cognition is proposed to be associated with cognitive and physiological arousal, in which a person is more responsive to environmental factors. As it is automatic, rapid and led by emotion, hot cognition may consequently cause biased decision making. Hot cognition may arise, with varying degrees of strength, in politics, religion, and other sociopolitical contexts because of moral issues, which are inevitably tied to emotion. Hot cognition was initially proposed in 1963 by Robert P. Abelson. The idea became popular in the 1960s and the 1970s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frontal lobe injury</span> Type of brain injury

The frontal lobe of the human brain is both relatively large in mass and less restricted in movement than the posterior portion of the brain. It is a component of the cerebral system, which supports goal directed behavior. This lobe is often cited as the part of the brain responsible for the ability to decide between good and bad choices, as well as recognize the consequences of different actions. Because of its location in the anterior part of the head, the frontal lobe is arguably more susceptible to injuries. Following a frontal lobe injury, an individual's abilities to make good choices and recognize consequences are often impaired. Memory impairment is another common effect associated with frontal lobe injuries, but this effect is less documented and may or may not be the result of flawed testing. Damage to the frontal lobe can cause increased irritability, which may include a change in mood and an inability to regulate behavior. Particularly, an injury of the frontal lobe could lead to deficits in executive function, such as anticipation, goal selection, planning, initiation, sequencing, monitoring, and self-correction. A widely reported case of frontal lobe injury was that of Phineas Gage, a railroad worker whose left frontal lobe was damaged by a large iron rod in 1848.

The California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) is one of the most widely used neuropsychological tests in North America. As an instrument, it represents a relatively new approach to clinical psychology and the cognitive science of memory. It measures episodic verbal learning and memory, and demonstrates sensitivity to a range of clinical conditions. The test does this by attempting to link memory deficits with impaired performance on specific tasks. It assesses encoding, recall and recognition in a single modality of item presentation (auditory-verbal). The CVLT is considered to be a more sensitive measure of episodic memory than other verbal learning tests. It was designed to not only measure how much a subject learned, but also reveal strategies employed and the types of errors made. The CVLT indexes free and cued recall, serial position effects, semantic clustering, intrusions, interference and recognition. Delis et al. (1994) released the California Verbal Learning Test for Children (CVLT-C). The California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) is an updated version of the original CVLT, which has been standardized and provides normative data.

The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), originally developed at the University of Cambridge in the 1980s but now provided in a commercial capacity by Cambridge Cognition, is a computer-based cognitive assessment system consisting of a battery of neuropsychological tests, administered to subjects using a touch screen computer. The CANTAB tests were co-invented by Professor Trevor Robbins and Professor Barbara Sahakian. The 25 tests in CANTAB examine various areas of cognitive function, including:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trail Making Test</span> Neuropsychological test

The Trail Making Test is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. It has two parts, in which the subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible while maintaining accuracy. The test can provide information about visual search speed, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functioning. It is sensitive to cognitive impairment associated with dementia, including Alzheimer's disease.

In psychology and neuroscience, executive dysfunction, or executive function deficit, is a disruption to the efficacy of the executive functions, which is a group of cognitive processes that regulate, control, and manage other cognitive processes. Executive dysfunction can refer to both neurocognitive deficits and behavioural symptoms. It is implicated in numerous psychopathologies and mental disorders, as well as short-term and long-term changes in non-clinical executive control. Executive dysfunction is the mechanism underlying ADHD paralysis, and in a broader context, it can encompass other cognitive difficulties like planning, organizing, initiating tasks and regulating emotions. It is a core characteristic of ADHD and can elucidate numerous other recognized symptoms.

Cognitive flexibility is an intrinsic property of a cognitive system often associated with the mental ability to adjust its activity and content, switch between different task rules and corresponding behavioral responses, maintain multiple concepts simultaneously and shift internal attention between them. The term cognitive flexibility is traditionally used to refer to one of the executive functions. In this sense, it can be seen as neural underpinnings of adaptive and flexible behavior. Most flexibility tests were developed under this assumption several decades ago. Nowadays, cognitive flexibility can also be referred to as a set of properties of the brain that facilitate flexible yet relevant switching between functional brain states.

In psychology, confabulation is a memory error consisting of the production of fabricated, distorted, or misinterpreted memories about oneself or the world. It is generally associated with certain types of brain damage or a specific subset of dementias. While still an area of ongoing research, the basal forebrain is implicated in the phenomenon of confabulation. People who confabulate present with incorrect memories ranging from subtle inaccuracies to surreal fabrications, and may include confusion or distortion in the temporal framing of memories. In general, they are very confident about their recollections, even when challenged with contradictory evidence.

The Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) is a neuropsychological test used to measure a variety of verbal and nonverbal executive functions for both children and adults. This assessment was developed over the span of a decade by Dean Delis, Edith Kaplan, and Joel Kramer, and it was published in 2001. The D-KEFS comprises nine tests that were designed to stand alone. Therefore, there are no aggregate measures or composite scores for an examinee's performance. A vast majority of these tests are modified, pre-existing measures ; however, some of these measures are new indices of executive functions.


The Boston Process Approach is a neurological assessment tool developed by Edith Kaplan and her colleagues, Harold Goodglass, Nelson Butters, Laird Cermak, and Norman Geschwind at the Boston Veterans Medical Center. The main purpose of the Boston Process Approach is to assess brain damage as well as cognitive impairments in patients through a series of tests that are related to memory, attention, intelligence, and other aspects of information processing. This approach is one of the more flexible and qualitative neurological assessments because it emphasizes how a patient performs a task instead of whether they succeeded or failed at it.

Developmental neuropsychology combines the fields of neuroscience and developmental psychology, while drawing from various other related disciplines. It examines the relationship of behavior and brain function throughout the course of an individual's lifespan, though often emphasis is put on childhood and adolescence when the majority of brain development occurs. Research tends to focus on development of important behavioral functions like perception, language, and other cognitive processes. Studies in this field are often centered around children or other individuals with developmental disorders or various kinds of brain related trauma or injury. A key concept of this field is that looks at and attempts to relate the psychological aspects of development, such as behavior, comprehension, cognition, etc., to the specific neural structures; it draws parallels between behavior and mechanism in the brain. Research in this field involves various cognitive tasks and tests as well as neuroimaging. Some of the many conditions studied by developmental neuropsychologists include congenital or acquired brain damage, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit disorder, executive dysfunction, seizures, intellectual disabilities, obsessive compulsive disorder, stuttering, schizophrenia, developmental aphasia, and other learning delays such as dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dyspraxia.

The Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) is a computer-based cognitive assessment used in clinical trials, healthcare, and academic research to measure neurological cognition. It was developed by Cogstate Ltd.

References

  1. ↑ Monchi, O., Petrides, M. Petre, V., Worsley, K., & Dagher, A. (2001). Wisconsin card sorting revisited: Distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21(19), 7733-7741.
  2. ↑ E. A. Berg. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking J. Gen. Psychol. 39: 15-22.
  3. ↑ Grant, D. A.; Berg, E. A. "Wisconsin Card Sorting Test". APA Psycnet. Retrieved 7 August 2024.
  4. ↑ Barceló, Francisco (2001). "Does the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Measure Prefontral Function?". The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 4 (1): 79–100. doi:10.1017/S1138741600005680. ISSN   1138-7416. PMID   11705346. S2CID   10432180.
  5. ↑ Jodzio, Krzysztof; Biechowska, Daria (2010-11-30). "Wisconsin Card Sorting Test as a Measure of Executive Function Impairments in Stroke Patients". Applied Neuropsychology. 17 (4): 267–277. doi:10.1080/09084282.2010.525104. ISSN   0908-4282. PMID   21154040. S2CID   205615311.
  6. ↑ Feldstein, Simeon N.; Keller, Frederick R.; Portman, Rebecca E.; Durham, Robert L.; Klebe, Kelli J.; Davis, Hasker P. (1999). "A Comparison of Computerized and Standard Versions of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test". The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 13 (3): 303–313. doi:10.1076/clin.13.3.303.1744. ISSN   1385-4046. PMID   10726602.
  7. ↑ Heaton, R. K., & Staff, P. A. R. (1993). Wisconsin card sorting test: computer version 2. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, 4, 1-4.
  8. ↑ Romine, C (2004). "Wisconsin Card Sorting Test with children: a meta-analytic study of sensitivity and specificity". Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 19 (8): 1027–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2003.12.009 . PMID   15533695.
  9. ↑ Bowden, Stephen C.; Fowler, Kylie S.; Bell, Richard C.; Whelan, Gregory; Clifford, Christine C.; Ritter, Alison J.; Long, Caroline M. (1998). "The Reliability and Internal Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test". Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 8 (3): 243–254. doi:10.1080/713755573. ISSN   0960-2011.
  10. ↑ Ozonoff, Sally (1995). "Reliability and validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in studies of autism". Neuropsychology. 9 (4): 491–500. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.9.4.491. ISSN   1931-1559.
  11. 1 2 Chiu, En-Chi; Wu, Wen-Chi; Hung, Jen-Wen; Tseng, Yu-Hsuan (2018-07-31). "Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in patients with stroke". Disability and Rehabilitation. 40 (16): 1967–1971. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1323020. ISSN   0963-8288. PMID   28494623. S2CID   205662922.
  12. ↑ Lichtenstein, Jonathan D.; Erdodi, Laszlo A.; Rai, Jaspreet K.; Mazur-Mosiewicz, Anya; Flaro, Lloyd (2018-02-17). "Wisconsin Card Sorting Test embedded validity indicators developed for adults can be extended to children". Child Neuropsychology. 24 (2): 247–260. doi:10.1080/09297049.2016.1259402. ISSN   0929-7049. PMID   27892806. S2CID   4546591.
  13. 1 2 Bell, Morris D.; Greig, Tamasine Conway; Kaplan, Edward; Bryson, Gary (1997). "Wisconsin card sorting test dimensions in schizophrenia: Factorial, predictive, and divergent validity". Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 19 (6): 933–941. doi:10.1080/01688639708403774. ISSN   1380-3395. PMID   9524888.
  14. ↑ Greve, Kevin W.; Bianchini, Kevin J.; Mathias, Charles W.; Houston, Rebecca J.; Crouch, John A. (2002). "Detecting Malingered Performance With the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A Preliminary Investigation in Traumatic Brain Injury". The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 16 (2): 179–191. doi:10.1076/clin.16.2.179.13241. ISSN   1385-4046. PMID   12221480. S2CID   42534630.
  15. ↑ Drewe, E.A. (1974). "The Effect of Type and Area of Brain Lesion on Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Performance". Cortex. 10 (2): 159–170. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(74)80006-7 . PMID   4844468.
  16. ↑ Banno M, Koide T, Aleksic B, et al. (2012). "Wisconsin Card Sorting Test scores and clinical and sociodemographic correlates in schizophrenia: multiple logistic regression analysis". BMJ Open. 2 (6): e001340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001340 . PMC   3533115 . PMID   23135537.
  17. 1 2 Anderson, Steven W.; Damasio, Hanna; Jones, R. Dallas; Tranel, Daniel (1991). "Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Performance as a Measure of Frontal Lobe Damage". Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 13 (6): 909–922. doi:10.1080/01688639108405107. ISSN   0168-8634. PMID   1779030.
  18. ↑ Robinson, Amy L.; Heaton, Robert K.; Lehman, Ralph A.; Stilson, Donald W. (1980). "The utility of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in detecting and localizing frontal lobe lesions". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 48 (5): 605–614. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.48.5.605. ISSN   1939-2117. PMID   7410659.
  19. ↑ Weyandt, Lisa L.; Willis, W. Grant (1994). "Executive functions in school‐aged children: Potential efficacy of tasks in discriminating clinical groups". Developmental Neuropsychology. 10 (1): 27–38. doi:10.1080/87565649409540564. ISSN   8756-5641.
  20. ↑ Rzezak, Patricia; Fuentes, Daniel; Guimarães, Catarina A.; Thome-Souza, Sigride; Kuczynski, Evelyn; Guerreiro, Marilisa; Valente, Kette D.R. (2009). "Executive dysfunction in children and adolescents with temporal lobe epilepsy: Is the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test enough?". Epilepsy & Behavior. 15 (3): 376–381. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.04.014. PMID   19379836. S2CID   19431911.
  21. ↑ Rhodes, Matthew G. (2004). "Age-Related Differences in Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A Meta-Analytic Review". Psychology and Aging. 19 (3): 482–494. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.3.482. ISSN   1939-1498. PMID   15382998.
  22. ↑ Chelune, Gordon J.; Baer, Ruth A. (1986). "Developmental norms for the wisconsin card sorting test". Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 8 (3): 219–228. doi:10.1080/01688638608401314. ISSN   0168-8634. PMID   3722348.
  23. ↑ Barceló, Francisco; Muñoz-Céspedes, Juan M; Pozo, Miguel A; Rubia, Francisco J (2000). "Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b Response in the Wisconsin card sorting test". Neuropsychologia. 38 (10): 1342–1355. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00046-4. PMID   10869577. S2CID   10663176.
  24. ↑ Wang, Lihong; Kakigi, Ryusuke; Hoshiyama, Minoru (2001). "Neural activities during Wisconsin Card Sorting Test — MEG observation". Cognitive Brain Research. 12 (1): 19–31. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00022-2. PMID   11489605.
  25. ↑ Berman, K (1995). "Physiological activation of a cortical network during performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A positron emission tomography study". Neuropsychologia. 33 (8): 1027–1046. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)00035-2. PMID   8524452. S2CID   21624133.
  26. ↑ Eling, Paul; Derckx, Kristianne; Maes, Roald (2008). "On the historical and conceptual background of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test". Brain and Cognition. 67 (3): 247–253. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.006. hdl: 2066/73651 . PMID   18328609. S2CID   205788199.
  27. ↑ Biederam J, Faraone S, Monutaeux M, et al. (2000). "Neuropsychological functioning in nonreferred siblings of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder". Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 109 (2): 252–65. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.109.2.252. PMID   10895563.
  28. ↑ Teubner-Rhodes, Susan; Vaden, Kenneth I.; Dubno, Judy R.; Eckert, Mark A. (2017). "Cognitive persistence: Development and validation of a novel measure from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test". Neuropsychologia. 102: 95–108. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.027. PMC   5538310 . PMID   28552783.
  29. ↑ US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health, 2009
  30. ↑ Mountain, Mary Ann; Snow, William G. (1993). "Wisconsin card sorting test as a measure of frontal pathology: A review". Clinical Neuropsychologist. 7 (1): 108–118. doi:10.1080/13854049308401893. ISSN   0920-1637.
  31. ↑ Stuss, D.T.; Levine, B.; Alexander, M.P.; Hong, J.; Palumbo, C.; Hamer, L.; Murphy, K.J.; Izukawa, D. (2000). "Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes". Neuropsychologia. 38 (4): 388–402. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00093-7. PMID   10683390. S2CID   23448920.
  32. ↑ Kane, M.J. & Engle, R.W. (2002). "The role of prefontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(4), 637-671. Retrieved from "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-12-27. Retrieved 2011-12-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  33. ↑ Basso, Michael R.; Lowery, Natasha; Ghormley, Courtney; Bornstein, Robert A. (2001). "Practice Effects on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test–64 Card Version Across 12 Months". The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 15 (4): 471–478. doi:10.1076/clin.15.4.471.1883. ISSN   1385-4046. PMID   11935448. S2CID   28784781.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.