Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture

Last updated

One quarter of the world's greenhouse gas emissions result from food and agriculture (data from 2019). Global greenhouse gas emissions from food production.png
One quarter of the world's greenhouse gas emissions result from food and agriculture (data from 2019).

The amount of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture is significant: The agriculture, forestry and land use sector contribute between 13% and 21% of global greenhouse gas emissions. [2] Emissions come from direct greenhouse gas emissions (for example from rice production and livestock farming). [3] and from indirect emissions. With regards to direct emissions, nitrous oxide and methane make up over half of total greenhouse gas emission from agriculture. [4] Indirect emissions on the other hand come from the conversion of non-agricultural land such as forests into agricultural land. [5] [6] Furthermore, there is also fossil fuel consumption for transport and fertilizer production. For example, the manufacture and use of nitrogen fertilizer contributes around 5% of all global greenhouse gas emissions. [7] Livestock farming is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. [8] At the same time, livestock farming is affected by climate change.

Contents

Farm animals' digestive systems can be put into two categories: monogastric and ruminant. Ruminant cattle for beef and dairy rank high in greenhouse gas emissions. In comparison, monogastric, or pigs and poultry-related foods, are lower. The consumption of the monogastric types may yield less emissions. Monogastric animals have a higher feed-conversion efficiency, and also do not produce as much methane. [9] Non-ruminant livestock, such as poultry, emit far fewer greenhouse gases. [10]

There are many strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture (this is one of the goals of climate-smart agriculture). Mitigation measures in the food system can be divided into four categories. These are demand-side changes, ecosystem protections, mitigation on farms, and mitigation in supply chains. On the demand side, limiting food waste is an effective way to reduce food emissions. Changes to a diet less reliant on animal products such as plant-based diets are also effective. [11] :XXV This could include milk substitutes and meat alternatives. Several methods are also under investigation to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from livestock farming. These include genetic selection, [12] [13] introduction of methanotrophic bacteria into the rumen, [14] [15] vaccines, feeds, [16] diet modification and grazing management. [17] [18] [19]

Emissions by type of greenhouse gas

Agricultural activities emit the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. [20]

Carbon dioxide emissions

Activities such as tilling of fields, planting of crops, and shipment of products cause carbon dioxide emissions. [21] Agriculture-related emissions of carbon dioxide account for around 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions. [22] Farm practices such as reducing tillage, decreasing empty land, returning biomass residue of crop to soil, and increasing the use of cover crops can reduce carbon emissions. [23]

Methane emissions

Methane emissions from agriculture, 2019. Methane (CHa) emissions are measured in tonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalents Methane-emissions-agriculture (OWID 0666).png
Methane emissions from agriculture, 2019. Methane (CHa) emissions are measured in tonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalents
Global methane budget. The Global Methane Budget 2008-2017.png
Global methane budget.

Methane emissions from livestock are the number one contributor to agricultural greenhouse gases globally. Livestock are responsible for 14.5% of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. One cow alone will emit 220 pounds of methane per year. [25] While the residence time of methane is much shorter than that of carbon dioxide, it is 28 times more capable of trapping heat. [25] Not only do livestock contribute to harmful emissions, but they also require a lot of land and may overgraze, which leads to unhealthy soil quality and reduced species diversity. [25] A few ways to reduce methane emissions include switching to plant-rich diets with less meat, feeding the cattle more nutritious food, manure management, and composting. [26]

Traditional rice cultivation is the second biggest agricultural methane source after livestock, with a near-term warming impact equivalent to the carbon-dioxide emissions from all aviation. [27] Government involvement in agricultural policy is limited due to high demand for agricultural products like corn, wheat, and milk. [28] The United States Agency for International Development's (USAID) global hunger and food security initiative, the Feed the Future project, is addressing food loss and waste. By addressing food loss and waste, greenhouse gas emission mitigation is also addressed. By only focusing on dairy systems of 20 value chains in 12 countries, food loss and waste could be reduced by 4-10%. [29] These numbers are impactful and would mitigate greenhouse gas emissions while still feeding the population. [29]

Nitrous oxide emissions

Global nitrous oxide budget. Global Nitrous Oxide Budget 2020.png
Global nitrous oxide budget.

Nitrous oxide emission comes from the increased use of synthetic and organic fertilizers. Fertilizers increase crop yield production and allows the crops to grow at a faster rate. Agricultural emissions of nitrous oxide make up 6% of the United States' greenhouse gas emissions; they have increased in concentration by 30% since 1980. [30] While 6% may appear to be a small contribution, nitrous oxide is 300 times more effective at trapping heat per pound than carbon dioxide and has a residence time of around 120 years. [30] Different management practices such as conserving water through drip irrigation, monitoring soil nutrients to avoid overfertilization, and using cover crops in place of fertilizer application may help in reducing nitrous oxide emissions. [31]

Emissions by type of activity

Land use changes

Substantial land-use change contributions to emissions have been made by Latin America, Southeast Asia, Africa, and Pacific Islands. Area of rectangles shows total emissions for that region. 2019 Greenhouse gas emissions per capita by region - variwide bar chart - IPCC AR6 WG3 - Fig SPM.2c.svg
Substantial land-use change contributions to emissions have been made by Latin America, Southeast Asia, Africa, and Pacific Islands. Area of rectangles shows total emissions for that region.

Agriculture contributes to greenhouse gas increases through land use in four main ways:

Together, these agricultural processes comprise 54% of methane emissions, roughly 80% of nitrous oxide emissions, and virtually all carbon dioxide emissions tied to land use. [33]

Land cover has changed majorly since 1750, as humans have deforested temperate regions. When forests and woodlands are cleared to make room for fields and pastures, the albedo of the affected area increases, which can result in either warming or cooling effects depending on local conditions. [34] Deforestation also affects regional carbon reuptake, which can result in increased concentrations of CO2, the dominant greenhouse gas. [35] Land-clearing methods such as slash and burn compound these effects, as the burning of biomatter directly releases greenhouse gases and particulate matter such as soot into the air. Land clearing can destroy the soil carbon sponge.

Livestock

Livestock farms where methane is emitted from the cattle. Livestock near Walnut Farm - geograph.org.uk - 3240836.jpg
Livestock farms where methane is emitted from the cattle.
Meat from cattle and sheep have the highest emissions intensity of any agricultural commodity. World Emissions Intensity Of Agricultural Commodities (2021).svg
Meat from cattle and sheep have the highest emissions intensity of any agricultural commodity.
Greenhouse gas emissions across the supply chain for different foods Environmental-impact-of-food-by-life-cycle-stage.png
Greenhouse gas emissions across the supply chain for different foods

Livestock produces the majority of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and demands around 30% of agricultural fresh water needs, while only supplying 18% of the global calorie intake. Animal-derived food plays a larger role in meeting human protein needs, yet is still a minority of supply at 39%, with crops providing the rest. [36] :746–747

Out of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, only SSP1 offers any realistic possibility of meeting the 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) target. [37] Together with measures like a massive deployment of green technology, this pathway assumes animal-derived food will play a lower role in the global diets relative to now. [38] As a result, there have been calls for phasing out subsidies currently offered to livestock farmers in many places worldwide, [39] and net zero transition plans now involve limits on total livestock headcounts, including substantial reductions of existing stocks in some countries with extensive animal agriculture sectors like Ireland. [40] Yet, an outright end to human consumption of meat and/or animal products is not currently considered a realistic goal. [41] Therefore, any comprehensive plan of adaptation to effects of climate change, particularly the present and future effects of climate change on agriculture, must also consider livestock.

Livestock activities also contribute disproportionately to land-use effects, since crops such as corn and alfalfa are cultivated in order to feed the animals.

In 2010, enteric fermentation accounted for 43% of the total greenhouse gas emissions from all agricultural activity in the world. [42] The meat from ruminants has a higher carbon equivalent footprint than other meats or vegetarian sources of protein based on a global meta-analysis of lifecycle assessment studies. [43] Small ruminants such as sheep and goats contribute approximately 475 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent to GHG emissions, which constitutes around 6.5% of world agriculture sector emissions. [44] Methane production by animals, principally ruminants, makes up an estimated 15-20% global production of methane. [45] [46]

Worldwide, livestock production occupies 70% of all land used for agriculture, or 30% of the land surface of the Earth. [47] The global food system is responsible for one-third of the global anthropogenic GHG emissions, [48] [49] of which meat accounts for nearly 60%. [50] [51]

Cows, sheep and other ruminants digest their food by enteric fermentation, and their burps are the main methane emissions from land use, land-use change, and forestry: together with methane and nitrous oxide from manure this makes livestock the main source of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. [52]

The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report in 2022 stated that: "Diets high in plant protein and low in meat and dairy are associated with lower GHG emissions. [...] Where appropriate, a shift to diets with a higher share of plant protein, moderate intake of animal-source foods and reduced intake of saturated fats could lead to substantial decreases in GHG emissions. Benefits would also include reduced land occupation and nutrient losses to the surrounding environment, while at the same time providing health benefits and reducing mortality from diet-related non-communicable diseases." [53]

Mean greenhouse gas emissions for different food types [54]
Food TypesGreenhouse Gas Emissions (g CO2-Ceq per g protein)
Ruminant Meat
62
Recirculating Aquaculture
30
Trawling Fishery
26
Non-recirculating Aquaculture
12
Pork
10
Poultry
10
Dairy
9.1
Non-trawling Fishery
8.6
Eggs
6.8
Starchy Roots
1.7
Wheat
1.2
Maize
1.2
Legumes
0.25

According to a 2022 study quickly stopping animal agriculture would provide half the GHG emission reduction needed to meet the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to 2 °C. [55] There are calls to phase out livestock subsidies as part of a just transition. [56]

In the context of global GHG emissions, food production within the global food system accounts for approximately 26%. Breaking it down, livestock and fisheries contribute 31%, whereas crop production, land use, and supply chains add 27%, 24%, and 18% respectively to the emissions. [57]

A 2023 study found that a vegan diet reduced emissions by 75%. [58] Research in New Zealand estimated that switching agricultural production towards a healthier diet while reducing greenhouse gas emissions would cost approximately 1% of the agricultural sector's export revenue, which is an order of magnitude less than the estimated health system savings from a healthier diet. [59]

Research continues on the use of various seaweed species, in particular Asparegopsis armata, as a food additive that helps reduce methane production in ruminants. [60]

Fertilizer production

The amount of greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide produced during the manufacture and use of nitrogen fertilizer is estimated as around 5% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. One third is produced during the production and two thirds during the use of fertilizers. [61] Nitrogen fertilizer can be converted by soil bacteria to nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas. [62] Nitrous oxide emissions by humans, most of which are from fertilizer, between 2007 and 2016 have been estimated at 7 million tonnes per year, [63] which is incompatible with limiting global warming to below 2 °C. [64]

Crop growth

CO2 is actually re-emitted into the atmosphere by plant and soil respiration in the later stages of crop growth, causing more greenhouse gas emissions. [65]

Rice production

Research work by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture to measure the greenhouse gas emissions of rice production. NP Rice Emissions18 (5687953086).jpg
Research work by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture to measure the greenhouse gas emissions of rice production.

In 2022, greenhouse gas emissions from rice cultivation were estimated at 5.7 billion tonnes CO2eq, representing 1.2% of total emissions. [66] Within the agriculture sector, rice produces almost half the greenhouse gas emissions from croplands, [67] some 30% of agricultural methane emissions, and 11% of agricultural nitrous oxide emissions. [68] Methane is released from rice fields subject to long-term flooding, as this inhibits the soil from absorbing atmospheric oxygen, resulting in anaerobic fermentation of organic matter in the soil. [69] Emissions can be limited by planting new varieties, not flooding continuously, and removing straw. [70]

It is possible to cut methane emissions in rice cultivation by improved water management, combining dry seeding and one drawdown, or executing a sequence of wetting and drying. This results in emission reductions of up to 90% compared to full flooding and even increased yields. [71]

Global estimates

World farm-gate greenhouse gas emissions by activity World Farm-gate Greenhouse Gas Emissions By Activity.svg
World farm-gate greenhouse gas emissions by activity

Between 2010 and 2019, agriculture, forestry and land use contributed between 13% and 21% to global greenhouse gas emissions. [2] Nitrous oxide and methane make up over half of total greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. [4]

In 2020, it was estimated that the food system as a whole contributed 37% of total greenhouse gas emissions, and that this figure was on course to increase by 30–40% by 2050 due to population growth and dietary change. [72]

Older estimates

In 2010, agriculture, forestry and land-use change were estimated to contribute 20–25% of global annual emissions. [73] :383

Mitigation

Agriculture is often not included in government emissions reductions plans. [74] For example, the agricultural sector is exempt from the EU emissions trading scheme [75] which covers around 40% of the EU greenhouse gas emissions. [76]

Almost 20% of greenhouse gas emissions come from the agriculture and forestry sector. [77] Mitigation measures in the food system can be divided into four categories. These are demand-side changes, ecosystem protections, mitigation on farms, and mitigation in supply chains. On the demand side, limiting food waste is an effective way to reduce food emissions. Changes to a diet less reliant on animal products such as plant-based diets are also effective. [78] :XXV

With 21% of global methane emissions, cattle are a major driver of global warming. [79] :6 When rainforests are cut and the land is converted for grazing, the impact is even higher. In Brazil, producing 1 kg of beef can result in the emission of up to 335 kg CO2-eq. [80] Other livestock, manure management and rice cultivation also emit greenhouse gases, in addition to fossil fuel combustion in agriculture.

Important mitigation options for reducing the greenhouse gas emissions from livestock include genetic selection, [81] [82] introduction of methanotrophic bacteria into the rumen, [83] [84] vaccines, feeds, [85] diet modification and grazing management. [86] [87] [88] Other options are diet changes towards ruminant-free alternatives, such as milk substitutes and meat analogues. Non-ruminant livestock, such as poultry, emit far fewer GHGs. [89]

It is possible to cut methane emissions in rice cultivation by improved water management, combining dry seeding and one drawdown, or executing a sequence of wetting and drying. This results in emission reductions of up to 90% compared to full flooding and even increased yields. [90]

Climate-smart agriculture

Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) (or climate resilient agriculture) is a set of farming methods that has three main objectives with regards to climate change. [91] [92] Firstly, they use adaptation methods to respond to the effects of climate change on agriculture (this also builds resilience to climate change). Secondly, they aim to increase agricultural productivity and to ensure food security for a growing world population. Thirdly, they try to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture as much as possible (for example by following carbon farming approaches). Climate-smart agriculture works as an integrated approach to managing land. This approach helps farmers to adapt their agricultural methods (for raising livestock and crops) to the effects of climate change. [92]

There are different actions to adapt to the future challenges for crops and livestock. For example, with regard to rising temperatures and heat stress, CSA can include the planting of heat tolerant crop varieties, mulching, boundary trees, and appropriate housing and spacing for cattle. [93]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Causes of climate change</span> Effort to scientifically ascertain mechanisms responsible for recent global warming

The scientific community has been investigating the causes of climate change for decades. After thousands of studies, it came to a consensus, where it is "unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land since pre-industrial times." This consensus is supported by around 200 scientific organizations worldwide, The dominant role in this climate change has been played by the direct emissions of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels. Indirect CO2 emissions from land use change, and the emissions of methane, nitrous oxide and other greenhouse gases play major supporting roles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change mitigation</span> Actions to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions to limit climate change

Climate change mitigation (or decarbonisation) is action to limit the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere that cause climate change. Greenhouse gas emissions are primarily caused by people burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas. Phasing out fossil fuel use can happen by conserving energy and replacing fossil fuels with clean energy sources such as wind, hydro, solar, and nuclear power. Secondary mitigation strategies include changes to land use and removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. Governments have pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but actions to date are insufficient to avoid dangerous levels of climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon footprint</span> Concept to quantify greenhouse gas emissions from activities or products

A carbon footprint (or greenhouse gas footprint) is a calculated value or index that makes it possible to compare the total amount of greenhouse gases that an activity, product, company or country adds to the atmosphere. Carbon footprints are usually reported in tonnes of emissions (CO2-equivalent) per unit of comparison. Such units can be for example tonnes CO2-eq per year, per kilogram of protein for consumption, per kilometer travelled, per piece of clothing and so forth. A product's carbon footprint includes the emissions for the entire life cycle. These run from the production along the supply chain to its final consumption and disposal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental vegetarianism</span> Type of practice of vegetarianism

Environmental vegetarianism is the practice of vegetarianism that is motivated by the desire to create a sustainable diet, which avoids the negative environmental impact of meat production. Livestock as a whole is estimated to be responsible for around 15% of global greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, significant reduction in meat consumption has been advocated by, among others, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in their 2019 special report and as part of the 2017 World Scientists' Warning to Humanity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Enteric fermentation</span> Digestive process that emits methane

Enteric fermentation is a digestive process by which carbohydrates are broken down by microorganisms into simple molecules for absorption into the bloodstream of an animal. Because of human agricultural reliance in many parts of the world on animals which digest by enteric fermentation, it is the second largest anthropogenic factor for the increase in methane emissions directly after fossil fuel use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions</span> Sources and amounts of greenhouse gases emitted to the atmosphere from human activities

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from human activities intensify the greenhouse effect. This contributes to climate change. Carbon dioxide, from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas, is one of the most important factors in causing climate change. The largest emitters are China followed by the United States. The United States has higher emissions per capita. The main producers fueling the emissions globally are large oil and gas companies. Emissions from human activities have increased atmospheric carbon dioxide by about 50% over pre-industrial levels. The growing levels of emissions have varied, but have been consistent among all greenhouse gases. Emissions in the 2010s averaged 56 billion tons a year, higher than any decade before. Total cumulative emissions from 1870 to 2017 were 425±20 GtC from fossil fuels and industry, and 180±60 GtC from land use change. Land-use change, such as deforestation, caused about 31% of cumulative emissions over 1870–2017, coal 32%, oil 25%, and gas 10%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable food system</span> Balanced growth of nutritional substances and their distribution

A sustainable food system is a type of food system that provides healthy food to people and creates sustainable environmental, economic, and social systems that surround food. Sustainable food systems start with the development of sustainable agricultural practices, development of more sustainable food distribution systems, creation of sustainable diets, and reduction of food waste throughout the system. Sustainable food systems have been argued to be central to many or all 17 Sustainable Development Goals.

<i>Livestocks Long Shadow</i> United Nations report

Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options is a United Nations report, released by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations on 29 November 2006, that "aims to assess the full impact of the livestock sector on environmental problems, along with potential technical and policy approaches to mitigation". It stated that livestock accounts for 18% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, a figure which FAO changed to 14.5% in its 2013 study Tackling climate change through livestock.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Low-carbon diet</span> Diet to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

A low-carbon diet is any diet that results in lower greenhouse gas emissions. Choosing a low carbon diet is one facet of developing sustainable diets which increase the long-term sustainability of humanity. Major tenets of a low-carbon diet include eating a plant-based diet, and in particular little or no beef and dairy. Low-carbon diets differ around the world in taste, style, and the frequency they are eaten. Asian countries like India and China feature vegetarian and vegan meals as staples in their diets. In contrast, Europe and North America rely on animal products for their Western diets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impacts of animal agriculture</span> Impact of farming animals on the environment

The environmental impacts of animal agriculture vary because of the wide variety of agricultural practices employed around the world. Despite this, all agricultural practices have been found to have a variety of effects on the environment to some extent. Animal agriculture, in particular meat production, can cause pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity loss, disease, and significant consumption of land, food, and water. Meat is obtained through a variety of methods, including organic farming, free-range farming, intensive livestock production, and subsistence agriculture. The livestock sector also includes wool, egg and dairy production, the livestock used for tillage, and fish farming.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atmospheric methane</span> Methane in Earths atmosphere

Atmospheric methane is the methane present in Earth's atmosphere. The concentration of atmospheric methane is increasing due to methane emissions, and is causing climate change. Methane is one of the most potent greenhouse gases. Methane's radiative forcing (RF) of climate is direct, and it is the second largest contributor to human-caused climate forcing in the historical period. Methane is a major source of water vapour in the stratosphere through oxidation; and water vapour adds about 15% to methane's radiative forcing effect. The global warming potential (GWP) for methane is about 84 in terms of its impact over a 20-year timeframe, and 28 in terms of its impact over a 100-year timeframe.

The environmental impact of agriculture is the effect that different farming practices have on the ecosystems around them, and how those effects can be traced back to those practices. The environmental impact of agriculture varies widely based on practices employed by farmers and by the scale of practice. Farming communities that try to reduce environmental impacts through modifying their practices will adopt sustainable agriculture practices. The negative impact of agriculture is an old issue that remains a concern even as experts design innovative means to reduce destruction and enhance eco-efficiency. Though some pastoralism is environmentally positive, modern animal agriculture practices tend to be more environmentally destructive than agricultural practices focused on fruits, vegetables and other biomass. The emissions of ammonia from cattle waste continue to raise concerns over environmental pollution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Individual action on climate change</span> What people can do individually to limit climate change

Individual action on climate change can include personal choices with regards to diet, travel, lifestyle, consumption of goods and services, family size and so on. Individuals can also get active in local and political advocacy work around climate action. People who wish to reduce their carbon footprint, can for example reduce air travel and driving cars, they can eat mainly a plant-based diet, use consumer products for longer, or have fewer children. Avoiding meat and dairy foods has been called "the single biggest way" how an individual can reduce their environmental impact. Scholars find that excessive consumption is more to blame for climate change than population increase. High consumption lifestyles have a greater environmental impact, with the richest 10% of people emitting about half the total lifestyle emissions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate-friendly gardening</span> Low greenhouse gases gardening

Climate-friendly gardening is a form of gardening that can reduce emissions of greenhouse gases from gardens and encourage the absorption of carbon dioxide by soils and plants in order to aid the reduction of global warming. To be a climate-friendly gardener means considering both what happens in a garden and the materials brought into it as well as the impact they have on land use and climate. It can also include garden features or activities in the garden that help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through processes not directly related to gardening.

Increasing methane emissions are a major contributor to the rising concentration of greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere, and are responsible for up to one-third of near-term global heating. During 2019, about 60% of methane released globally was from human activities, while natural sources contributed about 40%. Reducing methane emissions by capturing and utilizing the gas can produce simultaneous environmental and economic benefits.

A meat tax is a tax levied on meat and/or other animal products to help cover the health and environmental costs that result from using animals for food. Livestock is known to significantly contribute to global warming, and to negatively impact global nitrogen cycles and biodiversity.

The production of cattle has a significant environmental impact, whether measured in terms of methane emissions, land use, consumption of water, discharge of pollutants, or eutrophication of waterways.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate-smart agriculture</span> System for agricultural productivity

Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is a set of farming methods that has three main objectives with regards to climate change. Firstly, they use adaptation methods to respond to the effects of climate change on agriculture. Secondly, they aim to increase agricultural productivity and to ensure food security for a growing world population. Thirdly, they try to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture as much as possible. Climate-smart agriculture works as an integrated approach to managing land. This approach helps farmers to adapt their agricultural methods to the effects of climate change.

References

  1. "Food production is responsible for one-quarter of the world's greenhouse gas emissions". Our World in Data. Retrieved 20 July 2023.
  2. 1 2 Nabuurs, G-J.; Mrabet, R.; Abu Hatab, A.; Bustamante, M.; et al. "Chapter 7: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Uses (AFOLU)" (PDF). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. p. 750. doi:10.1017/9781009157926.009..
  3. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006). Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options (PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN. ISBN   978-92-5-105571-7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 June 2008.
  4. 1 2 FAO (2020). Emissions due to agriculture. Global, regional and country trends 2000–2018 (PDF) (Report). FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series. Vol. 18. Rome. p. 2. ISSN   2709-0078.
  5. Section 4.2: Agriculture's current contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, in: HLPE (June 2012). Food security and climate change. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. pp. 67–69. Archived from the original on 12 December 2014.
  6. Sarkodie, Samuel A.; Ntiamoah, Evans B.; Li, Dongmei (2019). "Panel heterogeneous distribution analysis of trade and modernized agriculture on CO2 emissions: The role of renewable and fossil fuel energy consumption". Natural Resources Forum. 43 (3): 135–153. doi: 10.1111/1477-8947.12183 . ISSN   1477-8947.
  7. "Carbon emissions from fertilizers could be reduced by as much as 80% by 2050". Science Daily. University of Cambridge. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
  8. "How livestock farming affects the environment". www.downtoearth.org.in. Retrieved 10 February 2022.
  9. Friel, Sharon; Dangour, Alan D.; Garnett, Tara; et al. (2009). "Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture". The Lancet. 374 (9706): 2016–2025. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61753-0. PMID   19942280. S2CID   6318195.
  10. "The carbon footprint of foods: are differences explained by the impacts of methane?". Our World in Data. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
  11. United Nations Environment Programme (2022). Emissions Gap Report 2022: The Closing Window — Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies. Nairobi.
  12. "Bovine Genomics | Genome Canada". www.genomecanada.ca. Archived from the original on 10 August 2019. Retrieved 2 August 2019.
  13. Airhart, Ellen. "Canada Is Using Genetics to Make Cows Less Gassy". Wired via www.wired.com.
  14. "The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review".
  15. Parmar, N.R.; Nirmal Kumar, J.I.; Joshi, C.G. (2015). "Exploring diet-dependent shifts in methanogen and methanotroph diversity in the rumen of Mehsani buffalo by a metagenomics approach". Frontiers in Life Science. 8 (4): 371–378. doi:10.1080/21553769.2015.1063550. S2CID   89217740.
  16. "Kowbucha, seaweed, vaccines: the race to reduce cows' methane emissions". The Guardian. 30 September 2021. Retrieved 1 December 2021.
  17. Boadi, D (2004). "Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review". Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84 (3): 319–335. doi: 10.4141/a03-109 .
  18. Martin, C. et al. 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4 : pp 351-365.
  19. Eckard, R. J.; et al. (2010). "Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review". Livestock Science. 130 (1–3): 47–56. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.010.
  20. Smith, Laurence G.; Kirk, Guy J. D.; Jones, Philip J.; Williams, Adrian G. (22 October 2019). "The greenhouse gas impacts of converting food production in England and Wales to organic methods". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 4641. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.4641S. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12622-7. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   6805889 . PMID   31641128.
  21. "Agricultural Practices Producing and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions" (PDF).
  22. US EPA, OAR (8 February 2023). "Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 4 April 2022.
  23. Food, Ministry of Agriculture and. "Reducing agricultural greenhouse gases - Province of British Columbia". www2.gov.bc.ca. Retrieved 4 April 2022.
  24. Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (11 May 2020). "CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions". Our World in Data.
  25. 1 2 3 Quinton, Amy (27 June 2019). "Cows and climate change".
  26. "Curbing methane emissions: How five industries can counter a major climate threat | McKinsey". www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved 4 April 2022.
  27. Reed, John (25 June 2020). "Thai rice farmers step up to tackle carbon footprint". Financial Times. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
  28. Leahy, Sinead; Clark, Harry; Reisinger, Andy (2020). "Challenges and Prospects for Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Pathways Consistent With the Paris Agreement". Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 4. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00069 . ISSN   2571-581X.
  29. 1 2 Galford, Gillian L.; Peña, Olivia; Sullivan, Amanda K.; Nash, Julie; Gurwick, Noel; Pirolli, Gillian; Richards, Meryl; White, Julianna; Wollenberg, Eva (2020). "Agricultural development addresses food loss and waste while reducing greenhouse gas emissions". Science of the Total Environment. 699: 134318. Bibcode:2020ScTEn.699m4318G. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134318 . PMID   33736198. S2CID   202879416.
  30. 1 2 "The Greenhouse Gas No One's Talking About: Nitrous Oxide on Farms, Explained". Civil Eats. 19 September 2019. Retrieved 4 April 2022.
  31. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. "Nitrous Oxide Emissions". ucanr.edu. Retrieved 4 April 2022.
  32. Fig. SPM.2c from Working Group III (4 April 2022). Climate Change 2022 / Mitigation of Climate Change / Summary for Policymakers (PDF). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. p. 10. ISBN   978-92-9169-160-9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 July 2023 via IPCC.ch. GDP data is for 2019.
  33. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Emissions Scenarios retrieved 26 June 2007
  34. "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" (PDF).
  35. IPCC Technical Summary retrieved 25 June 2007
  36. Kerr R.B., Hasegawa T., Lasco R., Bhatt I., Deryng D., Farrell A., Gurney-Smith H., Ju H., Lluch-Cota S., Meza F., Nelson G., Neufeldt H., Thornton P., 2022: Chapter 5: Food, Fibre and Other Ecosystem Products. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke,V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, US, pp. 1457–1579 |doi=10.1017/9781009325844.012
  37. Ellen Phiddian (5 April 2022). "Explainer: IPCC Scenarios". Cosmos . Retrieved 12 June 2023.
  38. Roth, Sabrina K.; Hader, John D.; Domercq, Prado; Sobek, Anna; MacLeod, Matthew (22 May 2023). "Scenario-based modelling of changes in chemical intake fraction in Sweden and the Baltic Sea under global change". Science of the Total Environment . 888: 2329–2340. Bibcode:2023ScTEn.888p4247R. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164247 . PMID   37196966. S2CID   258751271.
  39. "just-transition-meat-sector" (PDF).
  40. Lisa O'Carroll (3 November 2021). "Ireland would need to cull up to 1.3 million cattle to reach climate targets". The Guardian . Retrieved 12 June 2023.
  41. Rasmussen, Laura Vang; Hall, Charlotte; Vansant, Emilie C.; Braber, Bowie den; Olesen, Rasmus Skov (17 September 2021). "Rethinking the approach of a global shift toward plant-based diets". One Earth. 4 (9): 1201–1204. Bibcode:2021OEart...4.1201R. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.018 . S2CID   239376124.
  42. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2013) "FAO STATISTICAL YEARBOOK 2013 World Food and Agriculture". See data in Table 49.
  43. Ripple WJ, Smith P, Haberl H, Montzka SA, McAlpine C, Boucher DH (20 December 2013). "Ruminants, climate change and climate policy". Nature Climate Change. 4 (1): 2–5. Bibcode:2014NatCC...4....2R. doi:10.1038/nclimate2081.
  44. Giamouri, Elisavet; Zisis, Foivos; Mitsiopoulou, Christina; Christodoulou, Christos; Pappas, Athanasios C.; Simitzis, Panagiotis E.; Kamilaris, Charalampos; Galliou, Fenia; Manios, Thrassyvoulos; Mavrommatis, Alexandros; Tsiplakou, Eleni (24 February 2023). "Sustainable Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in Small Ruminants Farming". Sustainability. 15 (5): 4118. doi: 10.3390/su15054118 . ISSN   2071-1050.
  45. Cicerone RJ, Oremland RS (December 1988). "Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 2 (4): 299–327. Bibcode:1988GBioC...2..299C. doi:10.1029/GB002i004p00299. S2CID   56396847.
  46. Yavitt JB (1992). "Methane, biogeochemical cycle". Encyclopedia of Earth System Science. 3. London, England: Academic Press: 197–207.
  47. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar TD, Castel V, de Haan C (1 January 2006). Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options (PDF). Food & Agriculture Org. ISBN   9789251055717. Archived from the original on 25 June 2008 via Google Books.,
  48. "FAO – News Article: Food systems account for more than one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions". www.fao.org. Archived from the original on 30 September 2023. Retrieved 22 April 2021.
  49. Crippa, M.; Solazzo, E.; Guizzardi, D.; Monforti-Ferrario, F.; Tubiello, F. N.; Leip, A. (March 2021). "Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions". Nature Food. 2 (3): 198–209. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9 . ISSN   2662-1355. PMID   37117443.
  50. "How much does eating meat affect nations' greenhouse gas emissions?". Science News. 5 May 2022. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  51. Xu, Xiaoming; Sharma, Prateek; Shu, Shijie; Lin, Tzu-Shun; Ciais, Philippe; Tubiello, Francesco N.; Smith, Pete; Campbell, Nelson; Jain, Atul K. (September 2021). "Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods". Nature Food. 2 (9): 724–732. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x. hdl: 2164/18207 . ISSN   2662-1355. PMID   37117472. S2CID   240562878. News article: "Meat accounts for nearly 60% of all greenhouse gases from food production, study finds". The Guardian. 13 September 2021. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  52. Mitigation of Climate Change: Full report (Report). IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. 2022. 7.3.2.1 page 771.
  53. Mitigation of Climate Change: Technical Summary (Report). IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. 2022. TS.5.6.2.
  54. Michael Clark; Tilman, David (November 2014). "Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health". Nature. 515 (7528): 518–522. Bibcode:2014Natur.515..518T. doi:10.1038/nature13959. ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   25383533. S2CID   4453972.
  55. Eisen, Michael B.; Brown, Patrick O. (1 February 2022). "Rapid global phaseout of animal agriculture has the potential to stabilize greenhouse gas levels for 30 years and offset 68 percent of CO2 emissions this century". PLOS Climate. 1 (2): e0000010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000010 . ISSN   2767-3200. S2CID   246499803.
  56. "just-transition-meat-sector" (PDF).
  57. Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (18 March 2024). "Food production is responsible for one-quarter of the world's greenhouse gas emissions". Our World in Data.
  58. Carrington, Damian (20 July 2023). "Vegan diet massively cuts environmental damage, study shows". The Guardian . Retrieved 20 July 2023.
  59. McDowell, Richard W.; Herzig, Alexander; Weerden, Tony J. van der; Cleghorn, Christine; Kaye-Blake, William (23 November 2022). "Growing for good: producing a healthy, low greenhouse gas and water quality footprint diet in Aotearoa, New Zealand". Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand: 1–25. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2137532 .
  60. Hughes, Lesley (2 September 2022). "From designing clothes to refashioning cow burps: Sam's $40 million career switch". The Sydney Morning Herald. pp. 8–11. Retrieved 22 March 2023.
  61. "Carbon emissions from fertilizers could be reduced by as much as 80% by 2050". Science Daily. University of Cambridge. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
  62. "How Fertilizer Is Making Climate Change Worse". BloombergQuint. 10 September 2020. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  63. Tian, Hanqin; Xu, Rongting; Canadell, Josep G.; Thompson, Rona L.; Winiwarter, Wilfried; Suntharalingam, Parvadha; Davidson, Eric A.; Ciais, Philippe; Jackson, Robert B.; Janssens-Maenhout, Greet; Prather, Michael J. (October 2020). "A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks". Nature. 586 (7828): 248–256. Bibcode:2020Natur.586..248T. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2780-0. hdl: 1871.1/c74d4b68-ecf4-4c6d-890d-a1d0aaef01c9 . ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   33028999. S2CID   222217027. Archived from the original on 13 October 2020. Alt URL
  64. "Nitrogen fertiliser use could 'threaten global climate goals'". Carbon Brief. 7 October 2020. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  65. Sharma, Gagan Deep; Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim; Shahzad, Umer; Jain, Mansi; Chopra, Ritika (1 November 2021). "Exploring the nexus between agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions in BIMSTEC region: The role of renewable energy and human capital as moderators". Journal of Environmental Management. 297: 113316. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113316. ISSN   0301-4797. PMID   34293673.
  66. "Sectors: Rice cultivation". climatetrace.org. Retrieved 7 December 2023.
  67. Qian, Haoyu; Zhu, Xiangchen; Huang, Shan; Linquist, Bruce; Kuzyakov, Yakov; et al. (October 2023). "Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation in rice agriculture". Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 4 (10): 716–732. Bibcode:2023NRvEE...4..716Q. doi:10.1038/s43017-023-00482-1. hdl: 20.500.12327/2431 . ISSN   2662-138X. S2CID   263197017. Rice paddies …. account for ~48% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from croplands.
  68. Gupta, Khushboo; Kumar, Raushan; Baruah, Kushal Kumar; Hazarika, Samarendra; Karmakar, Susmita; Bordoloi, Nirmali (June 2021). "Greenhouse gas emission from rice fields: a review from Indian context". Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 28 (24): 30551–30572. Bibcode:2021ESPR...2830551G. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13935-1. PMID   33905059. S2CID   233403787.
  69. Neue, H. U. (1993). "Methane emission from rice fields: Wetland rice fields may make a major contribution to global warming". BioScience . 43 (7): 466–473. doi:10.2307/1311906. JSTOR   1311906. Archived from the original on 15 January 2008. Retrieved 4 February 2008.
  70. Qian, Haoyu; Zhu, Xiangchen; Huang, Shan; Linquist, Bruce; Kuzyakov, Yakov; et al. (October 2023). "Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation in rice agriculture". Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 4 (10): 716–732. Bibcode:2023NRvEE...4..716Q. doi:10.1038/s43017-023-00482-1. hdl: 20.500.12327/2431 . ISSN   2662-138X. S2CID   263197017.
  71. Searchinger, Tim; Adhya, Tapan K. (2014). "Wetting and Drying: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Saving Water from Rice Production". WRI.
  72. Science Advice for Policy by European Academies (2020). A sustainable food system for the European Union (PDF). Berlin: SAPEA. p. 39. doi:10.26356/sustainablefood. ISBN   978-3-9820301-7-3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 April 2020. Retrieved 14 April 2020.
  73. Blanco G., R. Gerlagh, S. Suh, J. Barrett, H.C. de Coninck, C.F. Diaz Morejon, R. Mathur, N. Nakicenovic, A. Ofosu Ahenkora, J. Pan, H. Pathak, J. Rice, R. Richels, S.J. Smith, D.I. Stern, F.L. Toth, and P. Zhou, 2014: Chapter 5: Drivers, Trends and Mitigation. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
  74. "Livestock – Climate Change's Forgotten Sector: Global Public Opinion on Meat and Dairy Consumption". www.chathamhouse.org. 3 December 2014. Retrieved 6 June 2021.
  75. Barbière, Cécile (12 March 2020). "Europe's agricultural sector struggles to reduce emissions". www.euractiv.com. Retrieved 6 June 2021.
  76. Anonymous (23 November 2016). "EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS)". Climate Action - European Commission. Retrieved 6 June 2021.
  77. Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (11 May 2020). "CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions". Our World in Data. Retrieved 21 December 2022.
  78. United Nations Environment Programme (2022). Emissions Gap Report 2022: The Closing Window — Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies. Nairobi.
  79. Olivier J.G.J. and Peters J.A.H.W. (2020), Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2020 report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
  80. Schmidinger, Kurt; Stehfest, Elke (2012). "Including CO2 implications of land occupation in LCAs – method and example for livestock products" (PDF). Int J Life Cycle Assess. 17 (8): 967. Bibcode:2012IJLCA..17..962S. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0434-7. S2CID   73625760. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 June 2021. Retrieved 9 June 2021.
  81. "Bovine Genomics | Genome Canada". www.genomecanada.ca. Archived from the original on 10 August 2019. Retrieved 2 August 2019.
  82. Airhart, Ellen. "Canada Is Using Genetics to Make Cows Less Gassy". Wired via www.wired.com.
  83. "The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review".
  84. Parmar, N.R.; Nirmal Kumar, J.I.; Joshi, C.G. (2015). "Exploring diet-dependent shifts in methanogen and methanotroph diversity in the rumen of Mehsani buffalo by a metagenomics approach". Frontiers in Life Science. 8 (4): 371–378. doi:10.1080/21553769.2015.1063550. S2CID   89217740.
  85. "Kowbucha, seaweed, vaccines: the race to reduce cows' methane emissions". The Guardian. 30 September 2021. Retrieved 1 December 2021.
  86. Boadi, D (2004). "Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review". Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84 (3): 319–335. doi: 10.4141/a03-109 .
  87. Martin, C. et al. 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4 : pp 351-365.
  88. Eckard, R. J.; et al. (2010). "Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review". Livestock Science. 130 (1–3): 47–56. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.010.
  89. "The carbon footprint of foods: are differences explained by the impacts of methane?". Our World in Data. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
  90. Searchinger, Tim; Adhya, Tapan K. (2014). "Wetting and Drying: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Saving Water from Rice Production". WRI.
  91. "Climate-Smart Agriculture". Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 19 June 2019. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  92. 1 2 "Climate-Smart Agriculture". World Bank . Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  93. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). "What is Climate Smart Agriculture?" (PDF). Retrieved 4 June 2022.