The 2024 University of Oxford election for the position of Chancellor became necessary upon the resignation of the incumbent Chancellor, Chris Patten. Applications for the role closed on 4 September 2024 and the list of accepted candidates was announced on 16 October.[1][2] More than 23,000 electors cast their votes in the first round, which took place during Third Week of Michaelmas term (week commencing 28 October 2024). This vote produced a shortlist of five candidates for the second and final round, to take place during Sixth Week of Michaelmas Term (week commencing 18 November 2024). On 27 November, William Hague was announced as the winner of the election.[3][4]
Baron Patten of Barnes had been elected as Chancellor of the University of Oxford in March 2003. In February 2024, he announced in a letter to the Vice-Chancellor of the university, Irene Tracey, that he would retire as Chancellor at the end of the academic year, after twenty-one years in post.[5][6] He pointed out that he was coming up to his 80th birthday.
In resigning, Patten quoted from the University of Oxford's statutes of 2002: "the Chancellor shall be elected by Convocation and shall hold office during his or her life or until his or her resignation."[5]
Other potential candidates were reported at the same time as the former British prime ministers Theresa May, Sir Tony Blair, and Boris Johnson and the former prime minister of Pakistan Imran Khan. All of these were members of the University of Oxford,[9][7] although this qualification was not strictly required, and in principle anyone could be nominated. The Daily Telegraph subsequently reported that Tony Blair's spokesman said "he was not in the running for the job."[7]
Stewart announced on social media in June that he would not be standing, saying "There’s been talk of me as a candidate for Oxford Chancellor. There are much better candidates than me for Oxford. I won’t be standing. Good luck to those who are."[10][11]
Process
For the election of 2024, the University discarded the previous requirement for candidates to be nominated by at least fifty members of the university's Convocation. Instead, candidates could simply nominate themselves.[12]
The University's Registrar, in a note to Congregation, reported that the Council envisaged that the Chancellor would have the following three qualities:[12]
outstanding achievements in their field and the ability to command respect beyond it;
a deep appreciation for the University's research and academic mission, its global community, and its ambition to remain a world class research and teaching university;
the ability and willingness to enhance the reputation of the University locally, nationally and abroad.
The election of 2024 was the first to take place on the internet. At all previous elections, ballots needed to be cast in person in Oxford.[7][13] Those eligible to vote in the election were the more than 250,000 members of Convocation; i.e. graduates of the university who have had their degree conferred, and current and retired staff members of the Congregation.[12]
The first round of online voting took place during Third Week of Michaelmas term (week commencing 28 October 2024). As there were more than ten candidates, a modified alternative vote system was used with two rounds of voting. In the first round, voters could rank as many of the candidates as they chose, and lower-ranking candidates were successively eliminated, with votes transferred to remaining candidates, until only five candidates remained. These five candidates went forward to a second round, to take place during Sixth Week of Michaelmas Term (week commencing 18 November 2024), again using the alternative vote system, with candidates to be successively eliminated until one candidate achieves 50% of the vote. The new Chancellor was to be announced during Seventh Week.[14]
Creation of Chancellor's Election Committee
On 22 March 2024, the University announced changes to its regulations governing the election of a new Chancellor, which were to take effect on 5 April 2024. Instead of any candidate being entitled to stand, subject to being nominated by fifty electors, a new Chancellor's Election Committee would remove nominated candidates from the election process whom it did not consider "suitable".[15]
The Committee would decide the criteria for suitability and may disclose what they were. It would "have due regard to the principles of equality and diversity".[15][16]
If the Committee found only one candidate suitable, it could declare that person to be elected unopposed or could choose to re-open the nominations.[15]
If in a contested election the voting was tied, the Chairman of the Committee would decide between the candidates with an equal number of votes.[15][16]
and other "representatives from across the collegiate University and its council".[15] These were listed as:
one person appointed by the University Council from among its external members;
two members of the Council appointed by it from among its members;
one member of Congregation appointed by the Gardens, Libraries and Museums, University administrative Services, and the Department for continuing Education;
one member of Congregation appointed by each of the divisional boards;
the early career research staff representative who attends the Council;
and the chair of the conference of colleges.
The Committee was given the power to co-opt one or two other members.[16]
Neil O'Brien MP, an Oxford graduate and member of Christ Church, commented the same day: "A stitch-up in Oxford: with no public discussion the University has decided to move away from democracy when choosing its next Chancellor."[17][18] An article in The Daily Telegraph the next day quoted his "stitch-up" comment and also an unnamed college don who had told the newspaper he saw the new Committee as an "undemocratic, Politburo-style election approach”. Dr Yuan Zi Zhou, a university lecturer in politics, commented that the changing of the rules "illustrates the control freak tendencies of modern academic managers". The removal of duly nominated candidates was believed to be unprecedented in such elections in the United Kingdom.[19]
On 25 March, the Evening Standard quoted an anonymous "senior cabinet minister" as saying: "We can’t have a stitch-up. The next chancellor must be selected by the same democratic process as the last one." It reported that "another senior government source", also anonymous, had commented: "It is all about this performative obsession with equality and diversity."[20] In a statement the University said:
"The next chancellor will be elected by convocation — the body of university members and alumni — using an online platform. Eligibility will first be checked by the chancellor's election committee against criteria agreed by council. The committee will be made up of representatives from across the collegiate university and its council."[20]
On 28 March, a letter from Vice-chancellor Irene Tracey appeared in The Times defending the changes and claiming "democracy is alive and well at Oxford".[21]
On 30 March, The Sunday Telegraph claimed to have seen a leaked email showing that the intended purpose of the Committee was "to stop politicians becoming chancellor". Damian Green, the former de facto deputy prime minister and a friend of Theresa May from their days at the University of Oxford, described the criteria as "a momentous and ill-advised change which at the very least should have been consulted on".[22]
On 15 May, The Times reported that "Oxford University has dropped plans to vet the candidates to become its new chancellor after being accused by ministers of an attempted "stitch up" to prevent another white male politician from getting the job...The change is designed to see off a row with senior government ministers, who attacked the proposals as "wokeism gone mad" and said they were designed to install university officials' preferred candidate."[23] In the same paper, the leader article welcomed the U-turn as "a victory for fairness and common sense."[24]
New limit to term of office
In the Middle Ages, Oxford chancellors were elected for a term of one to three years. Later, they were elected for life, beginning with John Russell in 1483.[25] A further function given to the new Chancellor's Election Committee in 2024 was to make a recommendation to the University Council to fix a term of office for the Chancellor. This would need to be decided upon by the Council.[16]
The purpose of the change was stated as "to prevent the coincidence of a newly appointed Vice-Chancellor and a new elected Chancellor".[26]
The term of office decided upon later in 2024 was ten years.[27]
Candidates enter the race
On 10 August 2024, it was reported that Lady Elish Angiolini was running, noting that if successful she would be the first woman Chancellor since the post was created in 1224.[28][29][30]
On 26 August, The Times reported that Margaret Casely-Hayford, a former Chancellor of the University of Coventry, was seeking to become Oxford's first female Chancellor, but was an "outside bet";[33] and that Professor Simon Kay, a plastic surgeon at who had performed the United Kingdom's first hand transplant, was another candidate.[33]
On 18 August 2024, it was reported that the former Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan had submitted his nomination papers for the role.[51][52] His adviser announced on 16 October that the application had been rejected. The university declined to state its reasons, but commented that a candidate must be a "fit and proper person" as determined by HM Revenue and Customs guidance.[53]
On 5 November, the University announced five candidates would proceed to the second and final round of voting. They were as follows:[54]
Elish Angiolini
Dominic Grieve
William Hague
Peter Mandelson
Jan Royall
The University emailed the 33 eliminated candidates stating "We will not be releasing any information or rankings or vote share on the first round at this point, so as not to influence the second round of the election." Matthew Firth, one of the eliminated candidates, derided the decision on Twitter as an "unacceptable lack of transparency" and "unacceptable and irregular". Civica Election Services were organising the election, and the University instructed Civica not to provide it with more detail than the first five ranked candidates, so as to forestall queries over the full result. Second round voting commenced on 18 November.[55]
↑Hackett, M. B. (1984). "The University as a Corporate Body". In Catto, J.I. (ed.). Early Oxford Schools. Oxford University Press. p.72. ISBN0-19-951011-3.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
