2025 Indian electoral controversy

Last updated
2025 Indian electoral controversy
Part of Democratic backsliding in India
DateAugust 2025 – present
Also known asVote chori
Type Politics of India
CauseAlleged irregularities by the Election Commission of India
MotiveAlleged rigging of the 2024 Indian general election and state assembly elections
Perpetrator

On 1 August 2025, Rahul Gandhi, the leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha, stated that his party, the Indian National Congress (INC), had found evidence of electoral fraud during the 2024 Indian general election. On 7 August, he alleged that the electoral rolls prepared by the Election Commission of India (ECI) for the Mahadevapura Assembly constituency in Karnataka consisted of various discrepancies, and accused the commission of "vote chori" (vote theft) and indulging in systematic fraud, in collusion with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Contents

The ECI dismissed the claims and urged him to submit them through a signed declaration. On 17 August, Gyanesh Kumar, the chief election commissioner, added that the allegations must be filed under oath within seven days, failing which they would be deemed “baseless and invalid," citing Rule 20(3)(B) of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.

Since then, the opposition parties led by the INC have organised protests and social media campaigns over the ECI's revision of Bihar's electoral rolls. In reaction to the allegation, several members and affiliates of the BJP have defended the commission, while counter accusing the opposition parties of having indulged in electoral fraud.

Background

Democratic backsliding under BJP rule since 2014

Since the victory of Narendra Modi, leading the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), in the 2014 Indian general election, India has witnessed significant democratic backsliding. [1] [2]

Laws on sedition, defamation, and counterterrorism have been regularly employed to crack down on critics and dissenting voices, including the detention and arrest of opposition leaders. [3] [4] The government has moved to further stifle critics in academia and the press, leading to the rise of an increasingly right-wing and pro-government mainstream media. [5] [6] The country's referee institutions, such as the judiciary, investigative agencies, the Election Commission of India (ECI), Lokpal, among others have been weakened through coercion, patronage, and ideological alignment with the BJP, leading to an erosion of public trust in institutions. [7] [8]

In 2021, the V-Dem Institute downgraded India from 'flawed democracy' to 'electoral autocracy'. [9] In 2021, Freedom House downgraded India from "free" to "partly free," a title the country has since held for three consecutive years since. [10] [11] [12]

Change in the appointment process of election commissioners

From 1947 to March 2, 2023 the appointment of the Central Election Commissioner was done solely by the Prime Minister and the Union Cabinet. On March 2, 2023, a five-judge Constitution Bench led by Justice K. M. Joseph held that appointments must be made based on the advice of a committee including the PM, LoP, and CJI—as a temporary or interim measure, until Parliament passes a law specifying a permanent process as verdict for the Anoop Baranwal v Union of India. As per the order, on August 2023, the government introduced the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 and was passed in Parliament in December 2023. The committee now consisted of the Prime Minister, The Leader of Opposition ( who was now included for the first time in the election process ) and a Union Minister. Election commissioners were now to be appointed by the President of India on the recommendation of a three-member panel, named the Selection Committee, through a majority vote.

Past allegation of electoral fraud

Earlier, the opposition Indian National Congress had accused the ECI of collusion with the ruling BJP, and of rigging the assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. [13]

The Bombay High Court dismissed petitions challenging the November 2024 Maharashtra Assembly election results, which alleged that around 76 lakh votes were cast after the 6 PM closing time—a practice the petition claimed was unlawful. Justices Girish Kulkarni and Arif Doctor stated: “There is nothing on record that at any polling station in the state of Maharashtra, any untoward incident or fraud took place... we fail to discern how, in the absence of any tangible material acceptable in law, which also needs to be booth-wise, there was any fraudulent voting.” They also called the petition “farcical” and an abuse of legal process. The petition was further criticized as a waste of judicial time, with courts noting that unsubstantiated claims are insufficient, especially when there’s no material evidence or proper election petition in place. The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court’s dismissal, declining to intervene. It pointed out that the challenge lacked required booth-wise evidence and it was filed as a writ petition—not as a legally prescribed election petition under the Representation of the People Act; The petitioner lacked locus standi (legal standing) to contest the statewide election results

As on the 2024 Haryana State Election, the Supreme Court received a petition, filed seeking re-polls in 20 Haryana assembly constituencies, based on allegations like EVM battery discrepancies, which Congress claimed correlated with election outcomes. The Supreme Court rejected this plea, including any request to stay the oath-taking of newly elected legislators. During hearings, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud warned: a “You want us to stall the oath-taking of an elected government? We are putting you on guard... we will impose costs.”

Allegation

On 1 August 2025, Rahul Gandhi, the leader of opposition in Lok Sabha, alleged electoral fraud during the 2024 Indian general election. He referred to the evidence as an "atom bomb" and stated that the ruling pa rty will have "no place to hide." [14] [15] [16] On 6 August, the opposition demanded a discussion on the special exercise carried out by the ECI for the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. Arjun Ram Meghwal, the law minister, asked Rahul Gandhi to present the evidences regarding the fraud and stated that the functioning of the election commission cannot be debated in parliament, citing a previous precedence by Lok Sabha speaker Balram Jakhar. [17]

On 7 August, Rahul Gandhi, in a meeting of the press, alleged that the election commission added fraudulent voters to the electoral roll in the Mahadevapura Assembly constituency in Karnataka, and accused the commission of rigging the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. The Congress lost the election to the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency, of which the assembly segment was part of, by 114,000 votes despite leading in the remaining six assembly segments of the constituency. [18] However in reality the election results were a 4-4 split instead of a 7-1 split that Rahul Gandhi had said. The Congress led in Saravanagar Congress led in four assembly segments under Bangalore Central: Sarvagnanagar, Shivajinagar, Shanti Nagar, Chamrajpet. The BJP led in four segments, not just Mahadevapura ( BJP lead of 1,15,046 votes ) but also in CV Raman Nagar — BJP lead of 20,114 votes, Gandhi Nagar — BJP lead of 23,324 votes, Rajaji Nagar — BJP lead of 39,429 votes.

In earlier Lok Sabha elections (2009 and 2014), BJP had led in five out of eight segments; in 2019 and 2024, both BJP and Congress led in four segments each.

He further stated that the evidences were a result of a six month long research conducted by the party, and challenged the election commission to publish a electronic voter list and CCTV footage to debunk his claims.[1]Rahul Gandhi accused the commission of systematic fraud, and claimed that the electoral rolls in Mahadevapura consisted of 11,956 duplicate voters, 40,009 with invalid addresses, 10,452 with bulk registrations (including an example case of 80 people with the same address), 4,132 with invalid photos, and 33,692 misusing Form 6 for registering as new voters. However the state electoral lists are prepared by the State Election Commission whose appointments are done by the respective state governments ( in Karnataka it the Siddharamaia led Congress Governement). A state Congress minister Rajanna publicly questioned Congress’s narrative on electoral malpractice in the recent Lok Sabha elections. He said that irregularities in the voter list for Mahadevapura occurred “during our government’s tenure” and lamented the party’s silence at the time. This directly contradicted the party's public charge of "vote theft" by the BJP and was seen as deeply embarrassing. The party’s high command intervened, asking him to resign. He submitted his resignation on the opening day of the Monsoon legislative session—reportedly under immense pressure and with strong signals from the top party leadership.

As per Dipankar Sarkar, a migrant resident of house no. 35, the alleged house which hosted 80 voters, the house was a small 10 ft (3.0 m) high building. As per The Print, officers from the district election office had queried about the 78 other voters in the residence, and had later had not confirmed their availability. Later The owner Jayaram Reddy, clarified that while the voter registrations used rental agreements for voter IDs, those tenants—often migrant laborers—no longer resided there at the time of the election. He said they registered at that address but did not necessarily vote from there during the polls. Rahul Gandhi also said that many voters had invalid father names, and house numbers. He cited an example of a 70-year old woman named Shakuni Devi, who was registered twice as a voter. Contradicting the claims however In a direct statement, Shakun Rani and her husband expressed that they felt harassed and distressed by media attention. She reiterated that she voted only once, pointing to the impact of the repeated allegations on their privacy and well-being.

Response from the ECI

The election commission dismissed the allegations as "baseless," and reverted that the Congress did not file any appeal or concern regarding the electoral rolls prior to the elections. It urged Rahul Gandhi to submit a written declaration with the allegations as per the rule 20(3)(B) of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. [19] The commission also reverted to the allegation of a particular voter Shlleged accusation of inclusion and exclusion of non-eligible and eligible voters by the election commission in the respective states. [20] On 17 August, chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar responded to the claims of Rahul Gandhi stating that if the claims are not made under a declaration under oath within seven days, it would be considered as "baseless and invalid." He further stated that if Rahul Gandhi is not willing to submit a signed affidavit, he should then "apologise for his allegations." [21]

Protests and reactions

On 11 August, about 200 lawmakers and their supporters held a protest against the special intensive revision exercise of the electoral rolls carried out in Bihar. [22] They marched to the office of the election commission office in New Delhi, and claimed that it is a government conspiracy for "vote theft" which will lead to disenfranchisement. [23] [24] The Delhi Police detained multiple protesters including Rahul Gandhi. [25] Protests were also held by the opposition in West Bengal. [26] Bharat Rashtra Samithi chairman K. T. Rama Rao accused the Congress of vote theft in the 2023 Telangana state elections. [27] Karnataka state minister K. N. Rajanna of the Congress condemned Rahul Gandhi's remarks on the election commission. He was removed from the cabinet for his remarks against his party leader, which sparked protests by his followers in Tumakuru district. [28] [29]

On 12 August, members of parliament from the Congress and other opposition parties protested the alleged electoral fraud by wearing t-shirts which bore the face of Minta Devi, a 124-year-old woman from the Daraunda Assembly constituency. [30] In response, union minister Kiren Rijiju criticised the protesters for allegedly "mocking" Minta Devi and claiming her to be 124 years of age. [31] Minta Devi, who was reportedly 35 years old, condemned the use of her picture in the protest without her permission. [32] The district administration later stated that a clerical error was responsible for the incorrect age. [33]

Anurag Thakur of the BJP called the allegations as an excuse for the defeat of congress in the elections and as a political agenda on the backdrop of the upcoming elections in Bihar. On 13 August, the BJP counter accused the opposition parties of electoral irregularities in various parliamentary seats such as Rae Bareli, Wayanad, Diamond Harbour, and Kannauj and demanded resignation of the respective opposition members Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Abhishek Banerjee, and Akhilesh Yadav representing those constituencies respectively. At a presentation held at the BJP headquarters in Delhi, the party alleged irregularities during the elections for the Kolathur assembly seat in Tamil Nadu represented by Tamil Nadu chief minister and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam chief M. K. Stalin and in the Mainpuri parliamentary seat in Uttar Pradesh represented by Samajwadi party leader Dimple Yadav. It further accused the opposition leaders for rigging elections, and blamed the opposition of protecting their "vote bank" of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh. [34] [35]

On 13 August, Rahul Gandhi reportedly met with seven voters of Bihar whose names were allegedly removed from the electoral rolls declaring them as dead. [36] On 14 August, he further declared that the opposition will set out a protest in all 30 districts of Bihar in three phases, beginning from 17 August, which was later postponed by a week. [37] On 15 August, Congress launched "Vote chori se azaadi" campaign on their social media handles, and requested people to change their display pictures to support their protest against the election commission. [38] On 18 August, it was reported in the media that the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance was contemplating about moving an impeachment motion against the chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. [39]

See also

References

  1. Brunkert, Lennart; Kruse, Stefan; Welzel, Christian (3 April 2019). "A tale of culture-bound regime evolution: the centennial democratic trend and its recent reversal" . Democratization. 26 (3): 422–443. doi:10.1080/13510347.2018.1542430. ISSN   1351-0347. S2CID   148625260. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
  2. Khaitan, Tarunabh (26 May 2020). "Killing a Constitution with a Thousand Cuts: Executive Aggrandizement and Party-state Fusion in India". Law & Ethics of Human Rights. 14 (1): 49–95. doi: 10.1515/lehr-2020-2009 . hdl: 11343/241852 . ISSN   2194-6531. S2CID   221083830.
  3. Pillai, Shreeya and Lindberg, Staffan I. (2021) "Democracy Broken Down: India" in Democracy Report 2021: Autocratization Turns Viral pp.20–21. V-Dem Institute
  4. "The Modi decade and how it changed India: India's endangered democracy and freedom". SOAS University of London . 6 September 2023.
  5. "Democratic Backsliding in India, the World's Largest Democracy". V-Dem Institute . 24 February 2020. Archived from the original on 27 February 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
  6. Ismat, Ara (9 December 2020). "At Farmers' Protest, Field Reporters of 'Godi Media' Channels Face the Heat". The Wire . Archived from the original on 27 November 2022.
  7. Vaishnav, Milan (15 May 2025). "Backsliding in India?" . Global Challenges to Democracy. Cambridge University Press: 35–53. doi:10.1017/9781009602570.003. ISBN   978-1-009-60257-0.
  8. Price, Gareth (7 April 2022). "Democracy in India". Chatham House .
  9. Biswas, Soutik (16 March 2021). "'Electoral autocracy': The downgrading of India's democracy". BBC .
  10. "India is now only 'partly free', says global report". BBC . 3 March 2021. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2021.
  11. Krishnankutty, Pia (13 March 2023). "Freedom 'losing ground' — India ranked 'partly free' for 3rd year by US non-profit Freedom House". ThePrint.
  12. "India rated 'partially free' in Freedom House report for third straight year". Scroll.in. 11 March 2023.
  13. Malpani, Mehul (21 July 2025). "'Madhya Pradesh elections could be stolen, just as in Maharashtra': Rahul Gandhi". The Hindu . ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  14. "Rahul Gandhi says what we have found is an 'atom bomb'; there's 100% proof EC is doing 'vote chori' for BJP". The Hindu . 1 August 2025. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 12 August 2025.
  15. "Hundreds of Indian Lawmakers Detained at a Protest Claiming Vote Rigging". The New York Times . 11 August 2025. Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  16. "India police detain Rahul Gandhi, other opposition leaders during protest over electoral roll". TRT global. Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  17. "Opposition pulls out former Rajya Sabha Chairman Dhankhar's remarks to counter government over SIR debate". The Hindu . 6 August 2025. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 12 August 2025.
  18. "Fix the flaws: On Rahul Gandhi's 'stolen elections' allegation and the Election Commission of India". The Hindu . 8 August 2025. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  19. "'Sign declaration or apologise': EC shreds Rahul Gandhi's '5 questions'". The Hindustan Times . 8 August 2025. Retrieved 12 August 2025.
  20. "CEOs of Maharashtra, Haryana issue fresh letter to Rahul Gandhi, give him 10 days to prove 'voter fraud' claims". The Times of India . 11 August 2025. ISSN   0971-8257 . Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  21. "Submit affidavit or apologise to the nation: CEC Gyanesh Kumar to Rahul Gandhi over his 'voter theft' allegations". The Economic Times . 17 August 2025. ISSN   0013-0389 . Retrieved 18 August 2025.
  22. Nair, Sobhana K. (11 August 2025). "Opposition protests against SIR, calls it 'vote theft' by government". The Hindu . ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  23. "'Vote theft': India's opposition protests against electoral roll revision". Al Jazeera . 11 August 2025. Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  24. "Explained: Why is the opposition protesting against India's election commission?". BBC News . 13 August 2025. Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  25. "Rahul Gandhi among opposition leaders detained during protest against India election panel". Reuters . 11 August 2025. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  26. "Bengal Congress activists hold protest outside Raj Bhavan". Press Trust of India . 14 August 2025. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  27. "KTR takes dig at Rahul Gandhi over 'Vote Chori' allegations". Telangana Today. 11 August 2025. Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  28. "Karnataka 'vote chori' row: Thousands protest KN Rajanna's removal from cabinet; supporter attempts self-immolation amid party dissent". The Times of India . 12 August 2025. ISSN   0971-8257 . Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  29. "Protests Erupt in Tumakuru Over Minister K N Rajanna's Removal from Cabinet". Deccan Herald . 14 August 2025. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  30. "Bihar SIR row protest: Congress MPs wear '124 not out' T-shirts over voter fraud allegations". The Hindu . 12 August 2025. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  31. "Will Congress apologise, BJP smirks as Bihar's Minta Devi hits out at Gandhis". India Today . 13 August 2025. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  32. "'Who gave Priyanka, Rahul Gandhi the right?': Minta Devi slams use of her name, photo in voter chori protest by India bloc". The Economic Times . 12 August 2025. ISSN   0013-0389 . Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  33. "Minta Devi, 124 not out' – error in Bihar woman's age on voter list gives ammo to Opposition; she says gave correct detail". The Indian Express . 13 August 2025. Retrieved 14 August 2025. The district administration claimed the discrepancy was a clerical error during the online application process...
  34. "'Chor machaye shor': BJP alleges irregularities in voter registration in seats of Oppn leaders". The New Indian Express . 13 August 2025. Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  35. ""Rahul Gandhi Wants To Save His 'Ghuspaithiye' Voters": BJP Flips The Debate On SIR". Times Now . 13 August 2025. Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  36. "Rahul Gandhi has tea with 'dead' voters from Bihar, thanks ECI for experience". The Hindu . 13 August 2025. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 13 August 2025.
  37. Tewary, Amarnath (4 August 2025). "Rahul Gandhi to begin yatra covering 30 districts in Bihar from August 17". The Hindu . ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  38. "Congress launches 'Vote Chori se Azaadi' campaign; urges for support by displaying picture". The Hindustan Times . 15 August 2025. Retrieved 17 August 2025.
  39. Nair, Sobhana K. (18 August 2025). "INDIA bloc considering motion to remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar". The Hindu . ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 18 August 2025.