Alberta Taciuk process

Last updated
Alberta Taciuk process
AOSTRA Taciuk process
Process typeChemical
Industrial sector(s) Chemical industry
oil industry
Feedstock oil shale
oil sands
organics-bearing materials
Product(s) shale oil
synthetic crude
Leading companies UMATAC Industrial Processes
Queensland Energy Resources
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Main facilities Stuart Oil Shale Plant
InventorWilliam Taciuk
Year of invention1975
Developer(s) UMATAC Industrial Processes

The Alberta Taciuk process (ATP; known also as the AOSTRA Taciuk process) is an above-ground dry thermal retorting technology for extracting oil from oil sands, oil shale and other organics-bearing materials, including oil contaminated soils, sludges and wastes. The technology is named after its inventor William Taciuk and the Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority. [1] [2]

Contents

History

The research and development of the ATP technology started in 1970. [3] In 1975, its inventor, William Taciuk, formed the UMATAC Industrial Processes (now part of Polysius) to further its development. [4] The first ATP pilot plant was constructed in 1977. [5]

The ATP was originally developed for pyrolysis of oil sand. [1] [3] However, its first commercial application in 1989 was dedicated to the environmental remediation of contaminated soils. [4] From 1999 to 2004, ATP technology was used for shale oil extraction at the Stuart Oil Shale Plant in Australia. [1] [4] [6] During that time, 1.5 million barrels (238.48×10^3 m3) of shale oil was extracted before the owner, Southern Pacific Petroleum Pty Ltd went into receivership. The subsequent owner, Queensland Energy Resources closed and dismantled the plant. [7]

In 2002, Estonian company Viru Keemia Grupp tested this technology; however, it was not taken into use. [8]

Technology

The ATP is an above-ground oil-shale retorting technology classified as a hot recycled solids technology. The distinguishing feature of the ATP is that the drying and pyrolysis of the oil shale or other feed, as well as the combustion, recycling, and cooling of spent materials and residues, all occur within a single rotating multi-chamber horizontal retort. [1] [4] [9] Its feed consists of fine particles.

Alberta Taciuk Processor (ATP) retort Alberta Taciuk Processor.PNG
Alberta Taciuk Processor (ATP) retort

In its shale-oil applications, fine particles (less than 25 millimetres (1.0 in) in diameter) are fed into the preheat tubes of the retort, where they are dried and preheated to 250 °C (480 °F) indirectly by hot shale ash and hot flue gas. [1] In the pyrolysis zone, oil shale particles are mixed with hot shale ash and the pyrolysis is performed at temperatures between 500 °C (930 °F) and 550 °C (1,020 °F). The resulting shale oil vapor is withdrawn from the retort through a vapour tube and recovered by condensation in other equipment. The char residues, mixed with ash, are moved to the combustion zone, and burnt at about 800 °C (1,470 °F) to form shale ash. Part of the ash is delivered to the pyrolysis zone, where its heat is recycled as a hot solid carrier; the other part is removed and cooled in the cooling zone with the combustion gases by heat transfer to the feed oil shale. [1] [2]

The advantages of the ATP technology for shale oil extraction lie in its simple and robust design, energy self-sufficiency, minimal process water requirements, ability to handle fine particles, and high oil yields. [3] It is particularly suited for processing materials with otherwise low oil yield. [10] The mechanical transfer of solids through the machine does not involve moving parts and it achieves improved process efficiencies through solid-to-solid heat transfer. [3] Most of the process energy (over 80%) is produced by combustion of char and produced oil shale gas; external energy inputs are minimal. [2] The oil yields are about 85–90% of Fischer Assay. [1] The organic carbon content of the process residue (spent shale) is less than 3%. [3] The process produces only small amounts of contaminated water with low concentrations of phenols. [11] These advantages also apply to its oil sands applications, including increased oil yield, a simplified process flow, reduction of bitumen losses to tailings, elimination of the need for tailing ponds, improvement in energy efficiency compared with the hot water extraction process, and elimination of requirements for chemical and other additives. [12]

A complication of the ATP is that retorting operations can reach temperatures at which carbonate minerals within the shale decompose, increasing greenhouse gas emissions. [2]

Operations

As of 2008, ATP was used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency at a PCB-contaminated site near Buffalo, New York, and at the Waukegan Harbor, Illinois. [13]

UMATAC Industrial Processes runs a 5 tons of oil shale per hour pilot processor in Calgary, Alberta for large scale tests of different oil shales. [14] The Fushun Mining Group of China has built a 250 tonnes per hour ATP plant that began commissioning in 2010. [15] Jordan Energy and Mining Ltd planned to use the ATP technology for extracting oil from Al Lajjun and Attarat oil shale deposits in Jordan. [16]

See also

Related Research Articles

Petrosix is the world's largest surface oil shale pyrolysis retort with an 11 metres (36 ft) diameter vertical shaft kiln, operational since 1992. It is located in São Mateus do Sul, Brazil, and it is owned and operated by the Brazil energy company Petrobras. Petrosix means also the Petrosix process, an externally generated hot gas technology of shale oil extraction. The technology is tailored to Irati oil shale formation, a Permian formation of the Paraná Basin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oil shale industry</span> Resource extraction industry

The oil shale industry is an industry of mining and processing of oil shale—a fine-grained sedimentary rock, containing significant amounts of kerogen, from which liquid hydrocarbons can be manufactured. The industry has developed in Brazil, China, Estonia and to some extent in Germany and Russia. Several other countries are currently conducting research on their oil shale reserves and production methods to improve efficiency and recovery. Estonia accounted for about 70% of the world's oil shale production in a study published in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shale oil extraction</span> Process for extracting oil from oil shale

Shale oil extraction is an industrial process for unconventional oil production. This process converts kerogen in oil shale into shale oil by pyrolysis, hydrogenation, or thermal dissolution. The resultant shale oil is used as fuel oil or upgraded to meet refinery feedstock specifications by adding hydrogen and removing sulfur and nitrogen impurities.

Oil shale economics deals with the economic feasibility of oil shale extraction and processing. Although usually oil shale economics is understood as shale oil extraction economics, the wider approach evaluates usage of oil shale as a whole, including for the oil-shale-fired power generation and production of by-products during retorting or shale oil upgrading processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of the oil shale industry</span>

Environmental impact of the oil shale industry includes the consideration of issues such as land use, waste management, and water and air pollution caused by the extraction and processing of oil shale. Surface mining of oil shale deposits causes the usual environmental impacts of open-pit mining. In addition, the combustion and thermal processing generate waste material, which must be disposed of, and harmful atmospheric emissions, including carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas. Experimental in-situ conversion processes and carbon capture and storage technologies may reduce some of these concerns in future, but may raise others, such as the pollution of groundwater.

Oil shale in China is an important source of unconventional oil. A total Chinese oil shale resource amounts of 720 billion tonnes, located in 80 deposits of 47 oil shale basins. This is equal to 48 billion tonnes of shale oil. At the same time there are speculations that the actual resource may even exceed the oil shale resource of the United States.

The Kiviter process is an above ground retorting technology for shale oil extraction.

The TOSCO II process is an above ground retorting technology for shale oil extraction, which uses fine particles of oil shale that are heated in a rotating kiln. The particularity of this process is that it use hot ceramic balls for the heat transfer between the retort and a heater. The process was tested in a 40 tonnes per hour test facility near Parachute, Colorado.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Galoter process</span> Shale oil extraction technology

The Galoter process is a shale oil extraction technology for the production of shale oil, a type of synthetic crude oil. In this process, the oil shale is decomposed into shale oil, oil shale gas, and spent residue. Decomposition is caused by mixing raw oil shale with hot oil shale ash generated by the combustion of carbonaceous residue (semi-coke) in the spent residue. The process was developed in the 1950s, and it is used commercially for shale oil production in Estonia. There are projects for further development of this technology and expansion of its usage, e.g., in Jordan and the USA.

The Fushun process is an above-ground retorting technology for shale oil extraction. It is named after the main production site of Fushun, Liaoning province in northeastern China.

The Paraho process is an above ground retorting technology for shale oil extraction. The name "Paraho" is delivered from the words "para homem", which means in Portuguese "for mankind".

The Lurgi–Ruhrgas process is an above-ground coal liquefaction and shale oil extraction technology. It is classified as a hot recycled solids technology.

The gas combustion retort process was an above-ground retorting technology for shale oil extraction. It was a predecessor of the Paraho and Petrosix processes, and modern directly heated oil shale retorting technologies in general.

The Nevada–Texas–Utah retort process was an above-ground shale oil extraction technology to produce shale oil, a type of synthetic crude oil. It heated oil shale in a sealed vessel (retort) causing its decomposition into shale oil, oil shale gas and spent residue. The process was developed in the 1920s and used for shale oil production in the United States and in Australia. The process was simple to operate; however, it was ceased from the operation because of a small capacity and labor extensiveness.

The Superior multimineral process is an above ground shale oil extraction technology designed for production of shale oil, a type of synthetic crude oil. The process heats oil shale in a sealed horizontal segmented vessel (retort) causing its decomposition into shale oil, oil shale gas and spent residue. The particularities of this process is a recovery of saline minerals from the oil shale, and a doughnut-shape of the retort. The process is suitable for processing of mineral-rich oil shales, such as in the Piceance Basin. It has a relatively high reliability and high oil yield. The technology was developed by the American oil company Superior Oil.

The Union process was an above ground shale oil extraction technology for production of shale oil, a type of synthetic crude oil. The process used a vertical retort where heating causes decomposition of oil shale into shale oil, oil shale gas and spent residue. The particularity of this process is that oil shale in the retort moves from the bottom upward to the top, countercurrent to the descending hot gases, by a mechanism known as a rock pump. The process technology was invented by the American oil company Unocal Corporation in late 1940s and was developed through several decades. The largest oil shale retort ever built was the Union B type retort.

The Chevron STB process is an above-ground shale oil extraction technology. It is classified as a hot recycled solids technology.

LLNL HRS process is an above-ground shale oil extraction technology. It is classified as a hot recycled solids technology.

KENTORT II is an above-ground shale oil extraction process developed by the Center for Applied Energy Research of the University of Kentucky. It is a hot recycled solids fluidized bed retorting process developed since 1982 for processing the eastern United States Devonian oil shales. The concept of this process was initiated in 1986 in the test unit.

The Shell Spher process is an above ground fluidization bed retorting technology for shale oil extraction. It is classified as a hot recycled solids technology.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Qian, Jialin; Wang Jianqiu (2006-11-07). World oil shale retorting technologies (PDF). Amman, Jordan: International Oil Shale Conference. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-05-27. Retrieved 2008-12-25.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Brandt, Adam R. (2009). "Converting Green River oil shale to liquid fuels with the Alberta Taciuk Processor: energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions". Energy & Fuels . 23 (12). American Chemical Society: 6253–6258. doi:10.1021/ef900678d. ISSN   0887-0624.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 "Strategic Significance of America's Oil Shale Resource. Volume II Oil Shale Resources, Technology and Economics". United States Department of Energy. 2004. S2CID   6915574.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. 1 2 3 4 Thomas r. Wood (January 2010). "FY-09 Summary Report to the Office of Petroleum Reserves on the Western Energy Corridor Initiative Activities and Accomplishments" (PDF). United States Department of Energy: 10. doi:10.2172/978357. S2CID   109882218 . Retrieved 2010-10-31.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. Odut, Steven; Taciuk, Gordon W.; Barge, John; Stamatis, Vicki; Melo, Daniel (2008-10-14). Alberta Taciuk Process (ATP) Technology – Recent Developments and Activities (PDF). 28th Oil Shale Symposium. Golden, Colorado: UMATAC Industrial Processes. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-10-07. Retrieved 2019-09-21.
  6. "Stuart Oil Shale project ready for restart". Alexander's Gas & Oil Connections. 2000-01-31. Retrieved 2008-12-25.
  7. "Shale Oil". Commonwealth of Australia – Australian Mines Atlas. 2009. Archived from the original on 2011-02-17. Retrieved 2010-01-15.
  8. "Estonian oilshale group tests new technology in Canada". BNN. 2002-09-09. Retrieved 2011-07-09.
  9. US 5366596,Taciuk, William; Caple, Roderick& Goodwin, Seanet al.,"Dry thermal processor",published 1994-11-22, assigned to Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority
  10. Õpik, Ilmar (1999). "Black scenario of oil shale power generating in Estonia". Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal. 16 (3). Estonian Academy Publishers: 193–196. doi: 10.3176/oil.1999.3.01 . ISSN   0208-189X. S2CID   252572222 . Retrieved 2008-12-25.
  11. Mölder, Leevi (2004). "Estonian Oil Shale Retorting Industry at a Crossroads" (PDF). Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal. 21 (2). Estonian Academy Publishers: 97–98. doi:10.3176/oil.2004.2.01. ISSN   0208-189X. S2CID   252707682 . Retrieved 2008-12-25.
  12. "Tar sands development background and technology overview.Appendix B" (PDF). Oil Shale and Tar Sands Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Information Center. December 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-20. Retrieved 2010-10-31.
  13. "AOSTRA-Taciuk Process (ATP)". Alberta Energy Research Institute. Archived from the original on 2003-01-18. Retrieved 2008-12-25.
  14. Parkinson, Gerald (2006). "Oil Shale: The U.S. Takes Another Look at a Huge Domestic Resource" (PDF). Chemical Engineering Progress. 102 (7): 7–10. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-17. Retrieved 2008-12-27.
  15. Chandler, Graham (2006). "US eyes Alberta as model for developing oil shale". Alberta Oil Magazine. 2 (4): 16–18. Retrieved 2008-12-25.
  16. "Main project description". Jordan Energy and Mining Limited. Archived from the original on 2009-09-23. Retrieved 2009-05-30.