Galoter process

Last updated
Galoter process
Enefit process
VKG Petroter.jpg
VKG Petroter
Process typeChemical
Industrial sector(s) Chemical industry
oil industry
Feedstock oil shale
Product(s) shale oil
Leading companies Eesti Energia
VKG Oil
Main facilities Narva Oil Plant
Petroter
InventorKrzhizhanovsky Power Engineering Institute
Developer(s) Eesti Energia
Outotec

The Galoter process (also known as TSK, UTT, or SHC; its newest modifications are called Enefit and Petroter) is a shale oil extraction technology for the production of shale oil, a type of synthetic crude oil. In this process, the oil shale is decomposed into shale oil, oil shale gas, and spent residue. Decomposition is caused by mixing raw oil shale with hot oil shale ash generated by the combustion of carbonaceous residue (semi-coke) in the spent residue. The process was developed in the 1950s, and it is used commercially for shale oil production in Estonia. There are projects for further development of this technology and expansion of its usage, e.g., in Jordan and the USA.

Contents

History

Research on the solid heat carrier process for pyrolysis of lignite, peat, and oil shale started in 1944 at the G. M. Krzhizhanovsky Power Engineering Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. [1] At the laboratory scale, the Galoter process was invented and developed in 1945–1946. [2] The process was named Galoter after the research team leader, Israel Galynker, whose name was combined with the word "thermal". [1] [3] [4]

Further research continued in Estonia. A pilot unit with a capacity of 2.5 tonnes of oil shale per day was built in Tallinn in 1947. [1] [4] The first Galoter-type commercial scale pilot retorts were built at Kiviõli, Estonia, in 1953 and 1963 (closed in 1963 and 1981, respectively), with capacities of 200 and 500 tonnes of oil shale per day, respectively. [2] [4] [5] [6] The Narva Oil Plant, annexed to the Eesti Power Plant and operating two Galoter-type 3000 tonnes per day retorts, was commissioned in Estonia in 1980. [5] [6] [7] These retorts were designed by AtomEnergoProject and developed in cooperation with the Krzhizhanovsky Institute. [1] [5] Started as a pilot plant, the process of converting it to a commercial-scale plant took about 20 years. During this period, the company has modernized more than 70% of the equipment compared to the initial design. [2]

In 1978, a 12.5-tonnes pilot plant was built in Verkhne-Sinevidnoy, Ukraine. It was used for testing Lviv–Volinsk lignite, and Carpathian, Kashpir (Russia), and Rotem (Israel) oil shales. In 1996–1997, a test unit was assembled in Tver. [1]

In 2008, Estonian energy company Eesti Energia, an operator of Galoter retorts at the Narva Oil Plant, established a joint venture with the Finnish technology company Outotec called Enefit Outotec Technology to develop and commercialize a modified Galoter process–the Enefit process–which combines the current process with circulating fluidized bed technologies. [8] In 2013, Enefit Outotec Technology opened an Enefit testing plant in Frankfurt. [9] [10] In 2012, Eesti Energia opened a new generation Galoter-type plant in Narva using Enefit 280 technology. [11]

In 2009–2015, VKG Oil, a subsidiary of Viru Keemia Grupp, opened in Kohtla-Järve, Estonia, three modified Galoter-type oil plants called Petroter. [12] [13] [14]

Technology

Galoter retort

The Galoter process is an above-ground oil-shale retorting technology classified as a hot recycled solids technology. [15] The process uses a horizontal cylindrical rotating kiln-type retort, which is slightly declined. [16] It has similarities with the TOSCO II process. [17] [18]

Before retorting, the oil shale is crushed into fine particles with a size of less than 25 millimetres (1.0 in) in diameter. The crushed oil shale is dried in the fluidized bed drier (aerofountain drier) by contact with hot gases. [5] [19] After drying and pre-heating to 135 °C (275 °F), oil shale particles are separated from gases by cyclonic separation. Oil shale is transported to the mixer chamber, where it is mixed with hot ash of 800 °C (1,470 °F), produced by combustion of spent oil shale in a separate furnace. [20] The ratio of oil shale ash to raw oil shale is 2.8–3:1. [5] The mixture is moved then to the hermetic rotating kiln. When the heat transfers from the hot ash to raw oil shale particles, the pyrolysis (chemical decomposition) begins in oxygen deficit conditions. [20] The temperature of pyrolysis is kept at 520 °C (970 °F). [17] Produced oil vapors and gases are cleaned of solids by cyclones and moved to condensation system (rectification column) where shale oil condenses and oil shale gas is separated in gaseous form. [5] [16] Spent shale (semi-coke) is transported then to the separate furnace for combustion to produce hot ash. A portion of the hot ash is separated from the furnace gas by cyclones and recycled to the rotary kiln for pyrolysis. [20] The remaining ash is removed from the combustion gas by more cyclones and cooled and removed for disposal by using water. [5] The cleaned hot gas returns to the oil shale dryer.

The Galoter process has high thermal and technological efficiency, and high oil recovery ratio. [7] [16] Oil yield reaches 8590% of Fischer Assay and retort gas yield accounts for 48 cubic meters per tonne. [16] Oil quality is considered good, but the equipment is sophisticated and capacity is relatively low. [7] This process creates less pollution than internal combustion technologies, as it uses less water, but it still generates carbon dioxide as also carbon disulfide and calcium sulfide. [21]

Enefit process

Enefit process is a modification of the Galoter process being developed by Enefit Outotec Technology. [22] In this process, the Galoter technology is combined with proven circulating fluidized bed (CFB) combustion technology used in coal-fired power plants and mineral processing. Oil shale particles and hot oil shale ash are mixed in a rotary drum as in the classical Galoter process. The primary modification is the replacing of the Galoter semi-coke furnace with a CFB furnace. The Enefit process also incorporates fluid bed ash cooler and waste heat boiler commonly used in coal-fired boilers to convert waste heat to steam for power generation. Compared to the traditional Galoter, the Enefit process allows complete combustion of carbonaceous residue, improved energy efficiency by maximum utilization of waste heat, and less water use for quenching. According to promoters, the Enefit process has a lower retorting time compare to the classical Galoter process and therefore it has a greater throughput. Avoidance of moving parts in the retorting zones increases their durability. [23]

Commercial use

Two Galoter retorts built in 1980 are used for oil production by the Narva Oil Plant, a subsidiary of the Estonian energy company Eesti Energia. [24] Both retorts process 125 tonnes per hour of oil shale. [25] The annual shale oil production is 135,000 tonnes and oil shale gas production is 40 million cubic metres per annum (1.4 billion cubic feet per annum). [2] Since 2012, it also uses a new plant employing Enefit 280 technology with a processing capacity of 2.26 million tonnes of oil shale per year and producing 290,000 tonnes of shale oil and 75 million cubic metres (2.6 billion cubic feet) of oil shale gas. [11] In addition, Eesti Energia planned to begin construction of similar Enefit plants in Jordan [26] and in USA. [27] Enefit Outotec Technology analysis suitability of Enefit technology for the Tarfaya oil shale deposit in Morocco, developed by San Leon Energy. [8]

VKG Oil operates in Kohtal-Järve, Estonia three modified Galoter-type oil plants called Petroter. [14] The basic engineering of these retorts was done by Atomenergoproject of Saint Petersburg. The basic engineering of the condensation and distillation plant was done by Rintekno of Finland. [28] The plant has a processing capacity of 1.1 million tonnes of oil shale per year and it produces 100,000 tonnes of shale oil, 30 million cubic metres (1.1 billion cubic feet) of oil shale gas, and 150 GWh of steam per year. [29]

Saudi Arabian International Corporation for Oil Shale Investment planned to utilize Galoter (UTT-3000) process to build a 30,000 barrels per day (4,800 m3/d) shale oil plant in Jordan. [30] [31] Uzbekneftegaz planned to build eight UTT-3000 plants in Uzbekistan. [32] [33] However, in December 2015 Uzbekneftegaz announced a postponement of the project. [34]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oil shale</span> Organic-rich fine-grained sedimentary rock containing kerogen

Oil shale is an organic-rich fine-grained sedimentary rock containing kerogen from which liquid hydrocarbons can be produced. In addition to kerogen, general composition of oil shales constitutes inorganic substance and bitumens. Based on their deposition environment, oil shales are classified as marine, lacustrine and terrestrial oil shales. Oil shales differ from oil-bearing shales, shale deposits that contain petroleum that is sometimes produced from drilled wells. Examples of oil-bearing shales are the Bakken Formation, Pierre Shale, Niobrara Formation, and Eagle Ford Formation. Accordingly, shale oil produced from oil shale should not be confused with tight oil, which is also frequently called shale oil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eesti Energia</span> Company based in Estonia

Eesti Energia AS is a public limited energy company in Estonia with its headquarters in Tallinn. It is the world's biggest oil shale to energy company. The company was founded in 1939. As of 2014, it operates in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Jordan and Utah, United States. In Estonia, the company operates under the name Eesti Energia, while using the brand name Enefit for international operations. The main raw material for energy production – oil shale – is extracted from mines located in Eastern-Estonia and owned by the company. The group of Eesti Energia has three main operation areas: electricity generation, shale oil production, and sale and distribution of electricity. Its shares are owned by the Government of Estonia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Narva Power Plants</span> Oil shale-fired power generation complex in Estonia

The Narva Power Plants are a power generation complex in and near Narva in Estonia, near the border with Leningrad Oblast, Russia. The complex consists of the world's two largest oil shale-fired thermal power plants, Eesti Power Plant and Balti Power Plant. In 2007, Narva Power Plants generated about 95% of total power production in Estonia. The complex is owned and operated by AS Narva Elektrijaamad, a subsidiary of Eesti Energia.

Viru Keemia Grupp (VKG) is an Estonian holding group of oil shale industry, power generation, and public utility companies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oil shale industry</span> Resource extraction industry

The oil shale industry is an industry of mining and processing of oil shale—a fine-grained sedimentary rock, containing significant amounts of kerogen, from which liquid hydrocarbons can be manufactured. The industry has developed in Brazil, China, Estonia and to some extent in Germany and Russia. Several other countries are currently conducting research on their oil shale reserves and production methods to improve efficiency and recovery. Estonia accounted for about 70% of the world's oil shale production in a study published in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shale oil extraction</span> Process for extracting oil from oil shale

Shale oil extraction is an industrial process for unconventional oil production. This process converts kerogen in oil shale into shale oil by pyrolysis, hydrogenation, or thermal dissolution. The resultant shale oil is used as fuel oil or upgraded to meet refinery feedstock specifications by adding hydrogen and removing sulfur and nitrogen impurities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the oil shale industry</span> Timeline of the production of oil shale

The history of the oil shale industry started in ancient times. The modern industrial use of oil shale for oil extraction dates to the mid-19th century and started growing just before World War I because of the mass production of automobiles and trucks and the supposed shortage of gasoline for transportation needs. Between the World Wars oil shale projects were begun in several countries.

Oil shale gas is a synthetic non-condensable gas mixture (syngas) produced by oil shale thermal processing (pyrolysis). Although often referred to as shale gas, it differs from the natural gas produced from shale, which is also known as shale gas.

Oil shale in China is an important source of unconventional oil. A total Chinese oil shale resource amounts of 720 billion tonnes, located in 80 deposits of 47 oil shale basins. This is equal to 48 billion tonnes of shale oil. At the same time there are speculations that the actual resource may even exceed the oil shale resource of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oil shale in Jordan</span> Overview of the industry in Jordan

Oil shale in Jordan represents a significant resource. Oil shale deposits in Jordan underlie more than 60% of Jordanian territory. The total resources amounts to 31 billion tonnes of oil shale.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oil shale in Estonia</span> Overview of the industry in Estonia

There are two kinds of oil shale in Estonia, both of which are sedimentary rocks laid down during the Ordovician geologic period. Graptolitic argillite is the larger oil shale resource, but, because its organic matter content is relatively low, it is not used industrially. The other is kukersite, which has been mined for more than a hundred years. Kukersite deposits in Estonia account for 1% of global oil shale deposits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Narva Oil Plant</span> Oil facility in Narva, Estonia

Narva Oil Plant is a commercial scale shale oil retorting facility located in Auvere near Narva, Estonia. The plant produces shale oil from oil shale by using Galoter/Eneffit technology. The facility belongs to Enefit Energiatootmine, a subsidiary of Eesti Energia.

The Kiviter process is an above ground retorting technology for shale oil extraction.

The Alberta Taciuk process is an above-ground dry thermal retorting technology for extracting oil from oil sands, oil shale and other organics-bearing materials, including oil contaminated soils, sludges and wastes. The technology is named after its inventor William Taciuk and the Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority.

The Fushun process is an above-ground retorting technology for shale oil extraction. It is named after the main production site of Fushun, Liaoning province in northeastern China.

Oil shale in Morocco represents a significant potential resource. The ten known oil shale deposits in Morocco contain over 53.381 billion barrels of shale oil. Although Moroccan oil shale has been studied since the 1930s and several pilot plants have extracted shale oil from the local formations, commercial extraction was not underway as of 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ahtme Power Plant</span> Power station in Estonia

Ahtme Power Plant was an oil shale-fired power plant in Ahtme, Kohtla-Järve, Estonia. It was owned by VKG Soojus, a subsidiary of Viru Keemia Grupp. Until the end 2012, it supplied with heat Ahtme district of Kohtla-Järve and Jõhvi.

The Kohtla-Järve Power Plant is an oil shale-fired power plant in Kohtla-Järve, Estonia, about 15 km to north-west of the Ahtme Power Plant. It is owned by VKG Soojus, a subsidiary of Viru Keemia Grupp. It consists of Põhja Power Plant and Lõuna Power Plant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Esimene Eesti Põlevkivitööstus</span> Company based in Estonia

Esimene Eesti Põlevkivitööstus was an oil shale company located in Kohtla-Järve, Estonia. It was a predecessor of Viru Keemia Grupp, a shale oil extraction company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Consolidated Gold Fields</span> Company based in Estonia

New Consolidated Gold Fields Ltd Estonian Branch was an oil shale company located in Kohtla-Nõmme, Estonia. It was a subsidiary of Consolidated Gold Fields.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Volkov, E.; Stelmakh, G. (1999). "The stages of research on creating commercial units for processing the oil shale fines. Development of the process "Galoter" in 1944-1999". Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal . Estonian Academy Publishers. 16 (2): 161–185. doi: 10.3176/oil.1999.2.08 . ISSN   0208-189X. S2CID   252577570 . Retrieved 2011-07-05.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Petersen, Ilmar (2006-09-07). The Unique Experience of Oil Shale Utilization at Narva Power Plants (NPP) (PDF). World Energy Council. Executive Council. Tallinn, Estonia: WEC-Estonia. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-02-25. Retrieved 2009-07-10.
  3. Volkov, E. (2013). "High-efficiency technology for oil shale processing" (PDF). Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal . Estonian Academy Publishers. 30 (2): 95–100. doi:10.3176/oil.2013.2.01. ISSN   0208-189X . Retrieved 2011-07-05.
  4. 1 2 3 Holmberg, Rurik (2008). Survival of the Unfit. Path Dependence and the Estonian Oil Shale Industry (PDF). Linköping Studies in Arts and Science. Vol. 427. Linköping University. pp. 188–189. Retrieved 2011-07-05.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Golubev, Nikolai (2003). "Solid heat carrier technology for oil shale retorting" (PDF). Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal. Estonian Academy Publishers. 20 (3 Special): 324–332. doi:10.3176/oil.2003.3S.05. ISSN   0208-189X. S2CID   131313828 . Retrieved 2008-12-14.
  6. 1 2 Ots, Arvo (2006) [2004]. Toni Tyson; Mary McQuillen (eds.). Oil Shale Fuel Combustion. Tallinn: Arv Ots; Eesti Energia. pp. 13–17. ISBN   978-9949-13-710-7.
  7. 1 2 3 Jaber, Jamel O.; Sladek, Thomas A.; Mernitz, Scott; Tarawneh, T. M. (2008). "Future Policies and Strategies for Oil Shale Development in Jordan" (PDF). Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. 2 (1): 31–44. ISSN   1995-6665 . Retrieved 2008-12-06.
  8. 1 2 "Eesti Energia Joint Venture to Assess Moroccan Shale Field". ERR. 2012-08-29. Retrieved 2014-03-08.
  9. "Eesti Energia Opens Testing Facility in Frankfurt". ERR. 2013-06-11. Retrieved 2014-04-14.
  10. "Estonia's Eesti Energia opens pilot plant in Frankfurt". Postimees . BNS. 2013-06-11. Retrieved 2014-04-14.
  11. 1 2 "Enefit Plant Costs Could Soar by €28 Million". ERR. 2014-03-24. Retrieved 2014-04-05.
  12. Hõbemägi, Toomas (2009-12-22). "VKG opens Estonia's most modern oil refinery". BBN. Archived from the original on 2011-10-03. Retrieved 2011-07-09.
  13. "Viru Keemia Group Opens Second Shale Oil Plant". ERR. 2014-10-08. Archived from the original on 2014-12-01. Retrieved 2015-01-04.
  14. 1 2 "VKG avas põlevkivitöötlemise tehase Petroter III" [VKG opens Petroter III oil shale processing plant]. Postimees (in Estonian). BNS. 2015-11-11. Archived from the original on 2014-12-01. Retrieved 2016-01-17.
  15. Burnham, Alan K.; McConaghy, James R. (2006-10-16). Comparison of the acceptability of various oil shale processes (PDF). 26th Oil shale symposium. Golden, Colorado: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. p. 17. UCRL-CONF-226717. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-02-13. Retrieved 2008-12-06.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Qian, Jialin; Wang Jianqiu (2006-11-07). World oil shale retorting technologies (PDF). Amman, Jordan: International Oil Shale Conference. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-05-27. Retrieved 2008-12-13.
  17. 1 2 Koel, Mihkel (1999). "Estonian oil shale". Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal . Estonian Academy Publishers (Extra). ISSN   0208-189X . Retrieved 2008-12-06.
  18. United States Office of Technology Assessment (June 1980). An Assessment of Oil Shale Technologies (PDF). DIANE Publishing. ISBN   978-1-4289-2463-5. NTIS order #PB80-210115. Retrieved 2009-07-10.
  19. Mõtlep, R.; Kirsimäe, K.; Talviste, P.; Puura, E.; Jürgenson, J. (2007). "Mineral composition of Estonian oil shale semi-coke sediments" (PDF). Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal . Estonian Academy Publishers. 24 (3): 97–98. doi:10.3176/oil.2007.3.01. ISSN   0208-189X. S2CID   18057213 . Retrieved 2009-07-10.
  20. 1 2 3 Soone, Jüri; Riisalu, Hella; Kekisheva, Ljudmilla; Doilov, Svjatoslav (2006-11-07). Environmentally sustainable use of energy and chemical potential of oil shale (PDF). Amman, Jordan: International Oil Shale Conference. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2008-12-06. Dry oil shale leaves the drier at temperature up to 135 °C and then is mixed with solid heat carrier – hot ash (750 – 800 °C) – at a ratio of 1,8/1. The ash is obtained by combustion of spent residue in a separate furnace. Mixture of oil shale and heat carrier is fed into a horizontal rotating retort.
  21. Mölder, Leevi (2004). "Estonian Oil Shale Retorting Industry at a Crossroads" (PDF). Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal . Estonian Academy Publishers. 21 (2): 97–98. doi:10.3176/oil.2004.2.01. ISSN   0208-189X. S2CID   252707682 . Retrieved 2008-11-23.
  22. Rikken, Kristopher (2011-06-28). "Enefit Gets Lookover from Utah Officials". ERR . Retrieved 2011-06-30.
  23. Siirde, Andres; Martins, Ants (2009-06-07). Oil shale fluidized bed retorting technology with CFB furnace for burning the by-products (PDF). International Oil Shale Symphosium. Tallinn, Estonia: Tallinn University of Technology. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-02-24. Retrieved 2009-07-10.
  24. Johnson, Harry R.; Crawford, Peter M.; Bunger, James W. (2004). "Strategic significance of America's oil shale resource. Volume II: Oil shale resources, technology and economics" (PDF). Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Petroleum Reserves; Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves; United States Department of Energy . Retrieved 2008-11-23.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  25. Liive, Sandor (2007). "Oil Shale Energetics in Estonia" (PDF). Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal . Estonian Academy Publishers. 24 (1): 1–4. doi:10.3176/oil.2007.1.01. ISSN   0208-189X . Retrieved 2007-06-24.
  26. "Jordan Oil Shale Project". Omar Al-Ayed, Balqa Applied University. 2008. Archived from the original on 2008-06-03. Retrieved 2008-08-15.
  27. Mikk, Harri (2011-06-03). Introduction to Enefit (PDF). Unconventional Fuel Conference. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-11-10. Retrieved 2011-06-24.
  28. "New shale oil line for VKG Oil AS" (PDF). Rintekno Newsletter. Rintekno Oy. 20. 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-20. Retrieved 2008-12-13.
  29. Aleksandrov, Julia; Purga, Jaanus (2010). "Viru Keemia Grupp opened a new oil shale processing plant in Estonia" (PDF). Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal . Estonian Academy Publishers. 27 (1): 84–85. ISSN   0208-189X . Retrieved 2011-03-20.
  30. Blokhin, Alexander; Golmshtok, Edouard; Petrov, Mikhail; Kozhitsev, Dmitriy; Salikhov, Ruslan; Thallab, Hashim (2008-10-15). Adaptation of Galoter Technology for High Sulfurous Oil Shale in Arid Region (PDF). 28th Oil Shale Symposium. Golden, Colorado . Retrieved 2011-10-29.
  31. "Cabinet approves deals for shale oil distillation, oil exploration". The Jordan Times . Jordan News Agency. 2013-03-03. Archived from the original on 2013-03-06. Retrieved 2013-03-06.
  32. "Atomenergoproekt have completed a conceptual design for 8 x UTT-3000 complex in Uzbekistan (Sangruntau)". TTU Ltd. 2012-11-20. Archived from the original on 2014-03-09. Retrieved 2013-03-31.
  33. Jafarova, Aynur (2013-05-13). "Oil-shale processing plant to be commissioned in Uzbekistan by 2016". AzerNews. Retrieved 2014-03-10.
  34. "Uzbekistan postpones shale plant construction". Trend News Agency . 2015-12-29. Retrieved 2016-03-25.