Arthur Waldron

Last updated
Arthur Waldron
Arthur Waldron.jpg
Photograph of Waldron taken by Richard Greenly in 2014
Born
Arthur Nelson Waldron

(1948-12-13) 13 December 1948 (age 75)
Boston, United States
Alma mater Harvard
Known forThe Great Wall of China: From History to Myth
SpouseXiaowei Yu (1988-present)
Scientific career
Fields Chinese history, comparative nationalism, integrative history, military history, international relations, Russian history
Institutions University of Pennsylvania
Naval War College
Brown
Princeton
Doctoral advisor Philip A. Kuhn, Joseph F. Fletcher Jr.
Other academic advisors Yingshih Yü, Frederick Mote, Richard Pipes

Arthur Waldron (born December 13, 1948) is an American historian. Since 1997, Waldron has been the Lauder Professor of International Relations in the department of history at the University of Pennsylvania. He works chiefly on Asia, China in particular, often with a focus on the origins and development of nationalism, and the study of war and violence in general.

Contents

Early life

Waldron was born in Boston on December 13, 1948. Waldron studied at the Taft School in Watertown, Connecticut and Winchester College in England. He attended Harvard College from which he graduated summa cum laude in 1971, receiving the Sophia Freund Prize, given to the student ranked academically highest in his class. In 1981 he received a Ph.D. in history, also from Harvard. [1]

Career

Waldron is a founder and vice president of the International Assessment and Strategy Center in Washington, D.C. [2] He is a former director of Asian studies with the American Enterprise Institute, [3] a director of the American Association of Chinese Studies, [4] a member of the board of the Jamestown Foundation, Washington, D.C., [5] and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. [2] Prior to arriving at the University of Pennsylvania, Waldron taught at, the U.S. Naval War College, and Princeton University, and as adjunct professor of East Asian Studies at Brown University. [1] In 2003–2004 he was visiting professor of history, at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.

Waldron has lived and studied in China, Japan, Taiwan, France, England, and the former Soviet Union, where he earned a certificate in Russian language proficiency. [1] He occasionally consults for the U.S. government, and was a founding member of the Congressional US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (2000-) [2] as well as one of twelve outside experts on the top-secret Tilelli Commission (2000–2001) which evaluated the CIA's China operations. [6] He has represented the United States in “track two” meetings with Korea, Taiwan, China, Japan and Russia. [1]

Research

Waldron studied Ming Dynasty (1368–1644) history at Harvard, during which he focused on why the relationship between the sedentary Ming and the nomadic Mongols who lived to the north often turned hostile. This led him to study the two debates over the recovery of the northwest loop of the Yellow River, known as the Ordos Loop. The debates are called in Chinese fu tao yi (復套議) and were the topic of his PhD dissertation. [7] After additional research, mostly undertaken at Princeton, this thesis culminated in his first book, The Great Wall of China: From History to Myth, which drew upon extensive documentary research to show that although multiple walls had been built at various times, the Ming Wall had given rise to the idea of the "Great Wall"—which turned out to be a constantly evolving compound of fact and myth, as well in recent times as a potent patriotic symbol. [8] According to Waldron's book, actual wall building was best understood as an aspect of larger frontier strategy, never a single grand project in itself. [9]

Also while at Princeton Waldron began working on the history and diplomacy of the early Republican (pre-Nationalist) period in China. A major source was the papers of John Van Antwerp MacMurray, who served as U.S. minister to China in the 1920s until his 1929 resignation. [10] In 1992, Waldron published MacMurray's memorandum of 1935, which foresaw the coming of conflict between the United States and Japan and was greatly esteemed by such later diplomats as George F. Kennan, with introduction and notes. [11]

Parallel research on China during the same period—that of the "Warlords" or junfa (軍閥), a term often taken as indigenous but that Waldron has demonstrated is borrowed from Japanese Marxist writings —produced his third book, From War to Nationalism, in 1995. [12] This presents a novel argument showing how the large-scale but almost entirely unstudied Second Zhili-Fengtian War of 1924 (his was the first book in any language, Chinese included, to analyze the conflict) [13] so utterly disrupted the existing political and power structures of China as to create a vacuum, along with the conditions for the emergence, in the following year, of the radical nationalist May Thirtieth Movement. That war brought the demise of much that had been standard in Chinese politics and international relations, often since the nineteenth century, while opening the way for the mass, strongly leftist, and nationalist politics (the phrase "Chinese nationalism" dramatically enters the English vocabulary in 1925) that becomes increasingly strong thereafter, ultimately bringing Communist rule in 1949.

Building on his War College experience, Waldron has continued at the University of Pennsylvania to research and teach comparative warfare and strategic analysis, ranging the world and recorded history, while also, in keeping with Sinological training, offering seemingly more conventional courses on Asian and Chinese history and culture, often dealing with the complex webs of causes that produce nationalism and related phenomena. His most recent publications have dealt with issues of Chinese patriotism, national identity, and military tactics in the Second World War. Waldron's research interests include twentieth century Chinese history, China's policies toward and conflicts with her neighbors, and Asian international relations. He is currently working on a study of the attempts to create a constitutional order in the aftermath of the Qing Dynasty.

Political views

Waldron is a frequent commentator and critic of the Chinese government and American foreign policy towards China. He has called American China policy since 1978 "[o]ur greatest foreign policy failure." [14] In 2000, he "oppose[d] the grant of permanent normal trade relations for the People’s Republic of China." [15] He recommends that "[r]ather than search pointlessly for understanding, win-win propositions, etc....it is time to hammer them in private on rights and military behavior." [16] He co-signed an open letter to Donald Trump in support of the Trump Administration's China policy. [17] He has compared China's foreign policy with that of Germany leading up to World War I, calling it a " Griff nach der Weltmacht , with Chinese characteristics." [18] Waldron has claimed that in China "[t]he pollution might kill your infants; the hospitals are terrible, the food is adulterated, the system corrupt and unpredictable" [19] and that the "disintegration of the People’s Republic of China is now under way.” [20] During the COVID-19 pandemic, he suggested the possibility that the virus originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. [21]

As a deterrent against China, in 2021 he proposed the nuclear armament of China's neighbors: "I believe just as Britain and France have a nuclear deterrent independent of the U.S., so should Japan, Australia and perhaps Taiwan and South Korea, which also face direct nuclear threats." [22]

Personal life

Waldron is married; he and his wife have two sons.

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

Isolationism is a term used to refer to a political philosophy advocating a foreign policy that opposes involvement in the political affairs, and especially the wars, of other countries. Thus, isolationism fundamentally advocates neutrality and opposes entanglement in military alliances and mutual defense pacts. In its purest form, isolationism opposes all commitments to foreign countries including treaties and trade agreements. This distinguishes isolationism from non-interventionism, which also advocates military neutrality but does not necessarily oppose international commitments and treaties in general.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese nationalism</span>

Chinese nationalism is a form of nationalism in which asserts that the Chinese people are a nation and promotes the cultural and national unity of all Chinese people. According to Sun Yat-sen's philosophy in the Three Principles of the People, Chinese nationalism is evaluated as multi-ethnic nationalism, which should be distinguished from Han nationalism or local ethnic nationalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ezra F. Vogel</span> American sociologist of East Asia (1930–2020)

Ezra Feivel Vogel was an American sociologist who wrote on modern Japan, China, and Korea. He was Henry Ford II Professor of the Social Sciences at Harvard University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Han nationalism</span> Ethnicity-exclusive form of Chinese nationalism

Han nationalism is a form of ethnic nationalism asserting ethnically Han people as the exclusive constituents of the Chinese nation. It is often in dialogue with other conceptions of Chinese nationalism, often mutually-exclusive or otherwise contradictory ones. Han people are the dominant ethnic group in both states claiming to represent the Chinese nation: the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-One Demands</span> 1915 Japanese set of demands to China

The Twenty-One Demands was a set of demands made during the First World War by the Empire of Japan under Prime Minister Ōkuma Shigenobu to the government of the Republic of China on 18 January 1915. The secret demands would greatly extend Japanese control of China. Japan would keep the former German areas it had conquered at the start of World War I in 1914. Japan would be strong in Manchuria and South Mongolia. And, Japan would have an expanded role in railways. The most extreme demands would give Japan a decisive voice in finance, policing, and government affairs. The last part would make China in effect a protectorate of Japan, and thereby reduce Western influence.

<i>Sakoku</i> Japanese isolationist policy from 1633–1853

Sakoku is the most common name for the isolationist foreign policy of the Japanese Tokugawa shogunate under which, during the Edo period, relations and trade between Japan and other countries were severely limited, and almost all foreign nationals were banned from entering Japan, while common Japanese people were kept from leaving the country. The policy was enacted by the shogunate government (bakufu) under Tokugawa Iemitsu through a number of edicts and policies from 1633 to 1639. The term sakoku originates from the manuscript work Sakoku-ron (鎖國論) written by Japanese astronomer and translator Shizuki Tadao in 1801. Shizuki invented the word while translating the works of the 17th-century German traveller Engelbert Kaempfer namely, his book, 'the history of Japan', posthumously released in 1727. Japan was not completely isolated under the sakoku policy. Sakoku was a system in which strict regulations were placed on commerce and foreign relations by the shogunate and certain feudal domains. There was extensive trade with China through the port of Nagasaki, in the far west of Japan, with a residential area for the Chinese. The policy stated that the only European influence permitted was the Dutch factory at Dejima in Nagasaki. Western scientific, technical and medical innovations flowed into Japan through Rangaku. Trade with Korea was limited to the Tsushima Domain and the wakan in Choryang. There were also diplomatic exchanges done through the Joseon Tongsinsa from Korea. Trade with the Ainu people was limited to the Matsumae Domain in Hokkaidō, and trade with the Ryūkyū Kingdom took place in Satsuma Domain. Apart from these direct commercial contacts in peripheral provinces, trading countries sent regular missions to the shōgun in Edo and at Osaka Castle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John King Fairbank</span> American sinologist (1907–1991)

John King Fairbank was an American historian of China and United States–China relations. He taught at Harvard University from 1936 until his retirement in 1977. He is credited with building the field of Sinology in the United States after World War II with his organizational ability, his mentorship of students, support of fellow scholars, and formulation of basic concepts to be tested.

Robert S. Ross is a professor of political science at Boston College, associate of the Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies at Harvard University, senior advisor of the security studies program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is one of the foremost American specialists on Chinese foreign and defense policy and U.S.-China relations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Wall of China</span> Series of defensive walls along the historical northern borders of China

The Great Wall of China is a series of fortifications that were built across the historical northern borders of ancient Chinese states and Imperial China as protection against various nomadic groups from the Eurasian Steppe. Several walls were built from as early as the 7th century BC, with selective stretches later joined by Qin Shi Huang (220–206 BC), the first emperor of China. Little of the Qin wall remains. Later on, many successive dynasties built and maintained multiple stretches of border walls. The best-known sections of the wall were built by the Ming dynasty (1368–1644).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Century of humiliation</span> Era in Chinese history (c. 1840–1940s)

The century of humiliation was a period in Chinese history beginning with the First Opium War (1839–1842), and ending in 1945 with China emerging out of the Second World War as one of the Big Four and established as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, or alternately, ending in 1949 with the founding of the People's Republic of China. The century-long period is typified by the decline, defeat and political fragmentation of the Qing dynasty and the subsequent Republic of China, which led to demoralizing foreign intervention, annexation and subjugation of China by Western powers, Russia, and Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">BM Jain</span> Indian political scientist

BM Jain is an Indian political scientist and Sinologist, who has developed and popularized psycho-cultural and geopsychological paradigms in the field of international relations (IR) and international security. He has developed the theory of geopsychology in IR as an alternative to mainstream IR theories. He defines it as "a set of perceptions, images, and belief systems, formed of shared history, culture, nationalism, religion, and ethnicity, which shape the mindsets and behavioral patterns of non-state and authoritarian actors and communities inhabiting a specific geographical area." In understanding China's foreign policy behavior, for instance, he has applied the geopsychology theoretical framework that lists core elements of China's geopsychology: Century of humiliation, the Middle Kingdom syndrome, cultural pride, nationalism, strategic culture, and the anti-hegemony discourse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tributary system of China</span> Network of loose international relations centered on China

The tributary system of China, or Cefeng system at its height was a network of loose international relations centered around China which facilitated trade and foreign relations by acknowledging China's hegemonic role within a Sinocentric world order. It involved multiple relationships of trade, military force, diplomacy and ritual. The other states had to send a tributary envoy to China on schedule, who would kowtow to the Chinese emperor as a form of tribute, and acknowledge his superiority and precedence. The other countries followed China's formal ritual in order to keep the peace with the more powerful neighbor and be eligible for diplomatic or military help under certain conditions. Political actors within the tributary system were largely autonomous and in almost all cases virtually independent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Great Wall of China</span> Aspect of Chinese military history

The history of the Great Wall of China began when fortifications built by various states during the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods were connected by the first emperor of China, Qin Shi Huang, to protect his newly founded Qin dynasty against incursions by nomads from Inner Asia. The walls were built of rammed earth, constructed using forced labour, and by 212 BC ran from Gansu to the coast of southern Manchuria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of China–Japan relations</span> Overview of the history of China-Japan relations

The history of China–Japan relations spans thousands of years through trade, cultural exchanges, friendships, and conflicts. Japan has deep historical and cultural ties with China; cultural contacts throughout its history have strongly influenced the nation – including its writing system architecture, cuisine, culture, literature, religion, philosophy, and law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zhao Yi</span>

Zhao Yi was a poet, historian, and critic during the Qing dynasty in China. Zhao is notable for his innovative poetry, his historical writings, and for espousing unconventional views on various aspects of Chinese dynastic history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thucydides Trap</span> Theorised tendency towards war between emerging and existing powers

The Thucydides Trap, or Thucydides' Trap, is a term popularized by American political scientist Graham T. Allison to describe an apparent tendency towards war when an emerging power threatens to displace an existing great power as a regional or international hegemon. The term exploded in popularity in 2015 and primarily applies to analysis of China–United States relations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ming Great Wall</span> Sections of the Great Wall of China built during the Ming dynasty (1368-1644)

The Ming Great Wall, built by the Ming dynasty (1368–1644), forms the most visible parts of the Great Wall of China today. A comprehensive archaeological survey, using advanced technologies, has concluded that the Ming walls measure 8,850 km (5,500 mi) from Jiayu Pass in the west to the sea in Shanhai Pass, then looping over to terminate in Manchuria at the Hushan Great Wall. This is made up of 6,259 km (3,889 mi) sections of actual wall, 359 km (223 mi) of trenches and 2,232 km (1,387 mi) of natural defensive barriers such as hills and rivers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-American sentiment in mainland China</span>

There is a history of anti-Americanism in China, beginning with the general disdain for foreigners in the early 19th century that culminated in the Boxer Rebellion of 1900, which the United States Marine Corps participated with other powers in suppressing. The 1905 Chinese boycott of American goods to protest discrimination against the Chinese living in America had a major negative impact on Chinese attitudes. After the Chinese Civil War, the United States and China fought an undeclared war during the Korean War, in which 148,000 Chinese soldiers died, that left bitter feelings on both sides. Relations warmed up after 1970, but large-scale anti-American sentiments significantly increased since US President Donald Trump launched a trade war against China in the late 2010s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vietnamese nationalism</span> Form of nationalism regarding the Vietnamese people and nation

Vietnamese nationalism is a form of nationalism that asserts Vietnam as a sovereign state and unify Vietnamese citizens into a nation. It encompasses a broad range of ideas and sentiments harbored by the Vietnamese ethnicities in regards with national identity and interests. In regard, Vietnamese ultranationalism or Kinh nationalism is a distinct form of Vietnamese nationalism that empathizes the uniqueness of Kinh Vietnamese and promotes Kinh domination and pursuit of ethnic assimilation over minorities within Vietnam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Japanese foreign relations</span>

The history of Japanese foreign relations deals with the international relations in terms of diplomacy, economics and political affairs from about 1850 to 2000. The kingdom was virtually isolated before the 1850s, with limited contacts through Dutch traders. The Meiji Restoration was a political revolution that installed a new leadership that was eager to borrow Western technology and organization. The government in Tokyo carefully monitored and controlled outside interactions. Japanese delegations to Europe brought back European standards which were widely imposed across the government and the economy. Trade flourished, as Japan rapidly industrialized.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "Arthur Waldron". University of Pennsylvania Department of History. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
  2. 1 2 3 "Arthur Waldron, Ph.D". International Assessment and Strategy Center. 2004. Archived from the original on May 29, 2015. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
  3. ↑ "AEI Expands Asian Studies Program". American Enterprise Institute. October 1, 1997. Archived from the original on November 2, 2014. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
  4. ↑ "About the AACS". American Association of Chinese Studies. Archived from the original on December 8, 2014. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
  5. ↑ "Board Members". The Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on April 26, 2009. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
  6. ↑ "Panel finds CIA soft on China". Washington Times. July 6, 2001. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
  7. ↑ “The Recovery of the Ordos: A Ming Strategic Debate” Harvard University, 1981.
  8. ↑ "The Great Wall of China: Tangible, Intangible and Destructible" Archived August 15, 2012, at the Wayback Machine , China Heritage Newsletter, The Australian National University, No. 1 (March 2005).
  9. ↑ Arthur Waldron, "The Great Wall of China: From History to Myth," (Cambridge University Press, 1992), ISBN   978-0521427074
  10. ↑ Helene Van Rossum, Escape to the Diamond Mountains in Korea, 1928 Archived February 16, 2013, at the Wayback Machine , Princeton University, Seeley G. Mudd Manuscript Library blog (21 September 2010).
  11. ↑ John Van Antwerp MacMurray, “How the Peace was Lost: The 1935 Memorandum, Developments Affecting American Policy in the Far East Archived March 19, 2023, at the Wayback Machine ”, Arthur Waldron (ed.), (Stanford, CA: Hoover Press, 1992), ISBN   0-8179-9151-4, p. 9.
  12. ↑ Arthur Waldron, "From War to Nationalism: China's Turning Point, 1924-1925", (Cambridge University Press, 2003), ISBN   978-0521523325
  13. ↑ "Chinese Military History Society Suggested Readings". Kansas State University. Retrieved February 19, 2015.
  14. ↑ Chang, Gordon G. (December 31, 2018). "Forty Years After U.S. Recognition, China Is 'America's Greatest Foreign Policy Failure'". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on June 29, 2022. Retrieved January 17, 2021.
  15. ↑ "govinfo". www.govinfo.gov. Retrieved April 15, 2021.
  16. ↑ Waldron, Evan A. Feigenbaum, Sophie Richardson, Orville Schell, Robert A. Kapp, Arthur. "Should Obama Cancel Xi's Visit -- Or Serve Him a Big Mac?". Foreign Policy. Retrieved January 17, 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ↑ admin. "Stay the Course on China: An Open Letter to President Trump | Journal of Political Risk" . Retrieved January 17, 2021.
  18. ↑ "Spared a War: Abe's Victory and Japan's Rearmament - FPRI". Foreign Policy Research Institute. November 28, 2017. Retrieved January 18, 2021.
  19. ↑ Waldron, Arthur (June 12, 2017). "There is no Thucydides Trap". SupChina. Archived from the original on September 18, 2019. Retrieved January 17, 2021.
  20. ↑ Chang, Gordon G. (August 5, 2019). "In Hong Kong, It's Now a Revolution". The National Interest. Retrieved January 17, 2021.
  21. ↑ Fenton, Josh. "'COVID-19 Probably Originated in a Wuhan Lab' -- Professor Arthur Waldron". GoLocalProv. Archived from the original on January 22, 2021. Retrieved January 17, 2021.
  22. ↑ "Biden's radical change in nuclear weapons policy favors China | Opinion". Newsweek. November 4, 2021. Retrieved November 11, 2021.
  23. ↑ Farmer, Edward L. (1992). "Review of The Great Wall of China: From History to Myth by Arthur Waldron". Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 52 (2): 709. doi:10.2307/2719176. ISSN   0073-0548. JSTOR   2719176.
  24. ↑ van de Ven, Hans (1996). "Book Reviews : Arthur WALDRON, From War to Nationalism: China's Turning Point, 1924–1925. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995. 366 pp., with glossary, bibliography, maps, and index. ISBN: 0-521-47238-5 (hc)". China Information. 11 (1): 190–193. doi:10.1177/0920203X9601100154. ISSN   0920-203X. S2CID   220802382.
  25. ↑ Black, Jeremy (2004). "Book review: Daniel Moran and Arthur Waldron, editors. The People in Arms: Military Myth and National Mobilization since the French Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2003. Pp. xi, 268. $65.00". The American Historical Review. doi:10.1086/ahr/109.1.149. ISSN   1937-5239.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.