Atractosteus simplex Temporal range: | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Fossil specimen, University of Wyoming | |
Scientific classification ![]() | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Actinopterygii |
Clade: | Ginglymodi |
Order: | Lepisosteiformes |
Family: | Lepisosteidae |
Genus: | Atractosteus |
Species: | †A. simplex |
Binomial name | |
†Atractosteus simplex (Leidy, 1873) | |
Synonyms | |
|
Atractosteus simplex (from simplex, Latin for "simple", likely referring to the smooth scales), the simplex gar [1] , is an extinct species of gar from the Early Eocene of western North America. It is known from many well-preserved specimens found in the famous Fossil Butte deposits of the Green River Formation in Wyoming, US. [2]
It was a close relative of the modern alligator gar (A. spatula), and one of two Atractosteus species known from Fossil Butte alongside the even larger A. atrox . It can be differentiated from the sympatric A. atrox by its lower number of lateral line scales and vertebrae, and reaching only 1 metre (3.3 ft) in length. [1] [3] It is the most abundant of the six gar species known from the Green River Formation, although even the 100-200 excavated specimens of this species are a minute percentage of the over 500,000 fossil fish specimens recovered from the formation. [1]
A. simplex was a highly predatory fish, with one fossil specimen preserving a young Diplomystus in its jaws. [1] Another specimen preserves coprolites in its mouth, representing the first instance of coprolites being found within a fossilized vertebrate's mouth. As gars are not known to engage in coprophagy, this is thought to likely represent an accidental ingestion or a consequence of taphonomy. [4]
The original type specimen is a skull fragment and some vertebrae recovered from the Bridger Formation, which Leidy (1873) named A.simplex, a name he also used for the well-preserved Green River Formation gars. However, this vertebra cannot be confidently assigned to A.simplex and may belong to A.atrox or Lepisosteus bemisi instead; for this reason, Eastman (1900) fixed the name to a more complete Green River specimen instead, which was treated as the "effective type" specimen. [1] [2]