Brian Wansink

Last updated

Brian Wansink
BRIAN435S6556 copy.jpg
Wansink in 1998
Born (1960-06-28) June 28, 1960 (age 63)
Sioux City, Iowa
Alma mater Wayne State College (BS)
Drake University (MA)
Stanford University (PhD)
Awards Ig Nobel Prize (2007)
Scientific career
Fields consumer behavior, nutrition psychology
Institutions Cornell University, University of Pennsylvania, Dartmouth College, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Website http://www.brianwansink.com/

Brian Wansink (born June 28, 1960) is an American former professor and researcher who worked in consumer behavior and marketing research. He was the executive director of the USDA's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (CNPP) from 2007 to 2009 and held the John S. Dyson Endowed Chair in the Applied Economics and Management Department at Cornell University, where he directed the Cornell Food and Brand Lab. [1]

Contents

Wansink's lab researched people's food choices and ways to improve those choices. Starting in 2017, problems with Wansink's papers and presentations were brought to wider public scrutiny. These problems included conclusions not supported by the data presented, data and figures duplicated across papers, questionable data (including impossible values), incorrect and inappropriate statistical analyses, and "p-hacking". [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] As of 2020 Wansink has had 18 of his research papers retracted (one twice). Seven other papers have received an expression of concern, and 15 others have been corrected. [8] On September 20, 2018, Cornell determined that Wansink had committed scientific misconduct and removed him from research and teaching activities; he resigned effective June 30, 2019. [6]

Early life and education

Brian Wansink was born in Sioux City, Iowa. [9] He was raised in a blue-collar family and is the older brother of Craig Wansink, [10] a professor and chair of the Department of Religious Studies at Virginia Wesleyan. [11] Wansink received a B.S. in business administration from Wayne State College (Nebraska) in 1982, where he was a member of Tau Kappa Epsilon Fraternity, and an M.A. in journalism and mass communication from Drake University in 1984, followed by a Ph.D. in marketing (consumer behavior) in 1990 from Stanford Graduate School of Business. [1] [12]

Career

Cornell Food and Brand Lab outreach ConsumerCampKids.jpg
Cornell Food and Brand Lab outreach

Professorships

Wansink's first academic appointment was to the faculty of the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College (1990–1994). He then taught at the Wharton Graduate School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania (1995–1997) and went on to a position as a marketing, nutritional science, advertising, and agricultural economics professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1997–2005) before moving to the Department of Applied Economics and Management in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Cornell University in 2005. [1] He set up a nonprofit foundation to support his work in 1999. [9] [10]

Research

Wansink's research focused on ways people make choices—for example, how portion sizes affect food intake. Some of his work led to the introduction of mini-size packaging. [13] Another of his papers found that people who eat with someone who is overweight will make worse food choices, which the UK National Health Service described as "not wholly convincing and does not prove this phenomenon exists in the general population." [14]

In 2005, Wansink's lab published experimental findings in a paper called "Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake". In this study, the lab built an apparatus containing a tube that pumped soup into the bottom of a bowl at a steady rate as the participant ate. Those who ate from the bottomless bowl ate more soup than those whose bowls were filled manually, thus making them more aware of the amount they ate. [15] [16] In 2007, Wansink received the Ig Nobel Prize in nutrition for the "bottomless bowls" study. [17] The experiment's data and analysis were challenged as part of the review of Wansink's body of work that started in 2017. [18]

In 2006, Wansink published Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think. [13] It was described as a popular science book combined with a self-help diet book, as each chapter ends with brief advice on eating. [19] The book details Wansink's research into what, how much, and when people eat. [13] [20] The book was cited by National Action Against Obesity as being helpful in efforts to curb obesity in the United States [21] and the National Institute of Health's Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research produced a "Brian Wansink Spotlight" video regarding this research in March 2016. [22]

In a 2009 paper retracted in 2018, [23] a team led by Wansink described their finding that calorie counts in The Joy of Cooking had gone up around 44% since the cookbook's first edition in 1936, and related this to the obesity epidemic. Over time this finding became a shorthand way to refer to the supposedly unhealthy Western pattern diet. The publisher of Joy of Cooking, John Becker, noticed that Wansink's sample size was small, consisting of only 18 recipes out of about 4500 that were published during the study time interval, and did his own analysis of changes in calories in the recipes. In 2017, after news of Wansink's research practices became widely discussed in the media, Becker sent his results to several statisticians, including James Heathers, a behavioral scientist at Northeastern University. Heathers found Wansink's conclusions to be invalid, and found a number of other problems with Wansink's paper, including counting a whole cake as a "serving" and comparing a recipe for a clear chicken broth with one for gumbo. [24]

Wansink's second book, Slim by Design, was released in 2014. In the same year he ran a Kickstarter campaign and raised around $10,000 to fund a coaching program based on the book; as of February 2018 the program had not been produced. [25]

USDA

Wansink was appointed as the executive director of the USDA's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion from November 2007 through January 2009. He was responsible for oversight of the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, MyPyramid.gov, and various other food-related programs administered by the USDA. [26]

In 2011, Wansink was elected to a one-year-term as president of the Society for Nutrition Education. [27]

Retractions and corrections

Pizza papers

In January 2017, the validity of research from Wansink's labs was called into question after Wansink had written a blog post about asking a graduate student to "salvage" conclusions from a study which had null results, subsequently producing five papers from it, all published with Wansink as co-author. [3] Statisticians Tim Van der Zee, Jordan Anaya, and Nicholas Brown analyzed four of the five papers (referred to as "the pizza papers"), and found conclusions not supported by the data presented, and a total of 150 questionable numbers, such as impossible values, incorrect ANOVA results, and dubious p-values. [2] [3] According to critics, requests for access to the original data were denied by Wansink, who cited privacy issues regarding the anonymity of the participants. A February 2017 article in New York Magazine described the pizza papers as "shockingly unprofessional" and expressed concern over the journals that published them. [2] [28]

In response, Wansink announced an in-depth review of the four disputed papers, after locating some of the original datasets, [29] and published a detailed response in March 2017. [3] A few days later, Cornell released a statement that the university administration had conducted a preliminary investigation of Wansink's four pizza papers, and had not found evidence of scientific misconduct. The investigation did find multiple cases of self-plagiarism and confirmed "numerous instances of inappropriate data handling and statistical analysis", requiring Wansink to hire independent, external statistical experts to check and reanalyze his own review of the papers. [3] [30]

Further corrections and retractions

Later in 2017, errors were found in six other papers published by members of the Cornell Food and Brand Lab. As of December 2017, six papers had been retracted and 14 corrections had been issued. [31]

By March 2018, two more papers had been retracted and an additional correction made, bringing the total counts to 8 retractions (one paper retracted twice) and 15 corrections. [5] In April 2018, JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) issued a "Notice of Expression of Concern" about all six articles authored by Wansink in JAMA and JAMA network specialty journals, to alert the scientific community of concerns about the validity of Wansink's research; the notice included a request for Cornell to have the validity of the papers independently assessed. [32] In September 2018 JAMA retracted six papers by Wansink. [33]

Seventeen other papers authored or co-authored by Wansink were retracted. [34] [31] [35] [7]

Cornell's investigation

In September 2018, Cornell determined that Wansink had committed scientific misconduct and removed him from all teaching and research positions; he was only allowed to help in investigations of his published work. He also resigned from the university, effective June 30, 2019. [6] After the announcement of his misconduct and resignation, Wansink acknowledged in emails to Buzzfeed that there had been some problems with his publications but also wrote, "There was no fraud, no intentional misreporting, no plagiarism, or no misappropriation." [6] Cornell released a summary of its investigation, in which it stated, "The practices identified included data falsification, a failure to assure data accuracy and integrity, inappropriate attribution of authorship of research publications, inappropriate research methods, failure to obtain necessary research approvals, and dual publication or submission of research findings." [36]

Books

Personal

Wansink is married and has three daughters. [37] His wife trained as a chef at Le Cordon Bleu. [38]

See also

Related Research Articles

In academic publishing, a retraction is a mechanism by which a published paper in an academic journal is flagged for being seriously flawed to the extent that their results and conclusions can no longer be relied upon. Retracted articles are not removed from the published literature but marked as retracted. In some cases it may be necessary to remove an article from publication, such as when the article is clearly defamatory, violates personal privacy, is the subject of a court order, or might pose a serious health risk to the general public.

Eric T. Poehlman, is an American scientist, formerly researching in the field of human obesity and aging. In 2000, Poehlman was investigated for scientific misconduct; the case continued for several years and in 2005, he admitted to fraudulent research practices. He had published research using falsified and fabricated data in studies on aging metabolism and obesity, including purporting to show beneficial effects on lipid profiles and abdominal fat in menopausal women being treated with hormone therapy. Poehlman became the first academic in the United States to be jailed for falsifying data in a grant application.

Andrew Jess Dannenberg is a U.S. physician and former researcher specializing in molecular mechanisms of cancer, formerly associated with Weill Medical College/M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Research into food choice investigates how people select the food they eat. An interdisciplinary topic, food choice comprises psychological and sociological aspects, economic issues and sensory aspects.

Carlo Maria Croce is an Italian-American professor of medicine at Ohio State University, specializing in oncology and the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer. Croce and his research have attracted public attention because of multiple allegations of scientific misconduct.

Joachim Boldt is a German anesthesiologist who fabricated or falsified data, including those reporting clinical trial results.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Retraction Watch</span> Blog covering scientific paper retractions

Retraction Watch is a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers and on related topics. The blog was launched in August 2010 and is produced by science writers Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus. Its parent organization is the Center for Scientific Integrity, a US 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.

Anil Potti is a physician and former Duke University associate professor and cancer researcher, focusing on oncogenomics. He, along with Joseph Nevins, are at the center of a research fabrication scandal at Duke University. On 9 November 2015, the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) found that Potti had engaged in research misconduct. According to Potti's voluntary settlement agreement with ORI, Potti can continue to perform research with the requirement of supervision until year 2020, while he "neither admits nor denies ORI's findings of research misconduct." As of 2020 Potti, who is employed at the Cancer Center of North Dakota, has had 11 of his research publications retracted, one publication has received an expression of concern, and two others have been corrected.

Dipak Kumar Das was the director of the Cardiovascular Research Center at the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington and is known for research fraud. His work centered on the beneficial properties of resveratrol, which is found in red wine, but over twenty of his research papers have been since retracted.

Yoshitaka Fujii is a Japanese researcher in anesthesiology, who in 2012 was found to have fabricated data in at least 219 scientific papers, of which 183 have been retracted.

Moon Hyung-In is a professor at Dong-A University in Busan, South Korea. He is a member of the Department of Medicinal Biotechnology, and he earned his PhD in the Department of Pharmacy at Sungkyunkwan University in 2001.

Bharat B. Aggarwal is an Indian-American biochemist. His research has been in the areas of cytokines, the role of inflammation in cancer, and the anti-cancer effects of spices and herbs, particularly curcumin. He was a professor in the Department of Clinical Immunology, Bioimmunotherapy, and Experimental Therapeutics at University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas.

Annarosa Leri is a medical doctor and former associate professor at Harvard University. Along with former professor Piero Anversa, Leri was engaged in biomedical research at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, an affiliate of Harvard Medical School. Since at least 2003 Anversa and Leri had investigated the ability of the heart to regenerate damaged cells using cardiac stem cells.

The C.A.N approach to eating behavior proposes three strategies in consumer psychology that can help people make healthier food choices. The food must be convenient (C), attractive (A), and normal (N), or CAN. The idea was researched and created by Brian Wansink, Director of the Cornell Food and Brand Lab, and others at Cornell University. Wansink has since resigned after 15 of his papers were retracted and he was found guilty of academic misconduct.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nina Teicholz</span> American journalist

Nina Teicholz is a journalist who advocates for reducing restrictions on naturally-occurring fats, including saturated fats, in the American diet.

Ching-Shih Chen is the former Lucius A. Wing Chair of Cancer Research and professor of medicinal chemistry at Ohio State University (OSU). In 2018, Chen resigned his positions at OSU, and the university released a report on an investigation into Chen's scientific misconduct. As of 2020, Chen has had ten of his research publications retracted, two papers have received an expression of concern, and five others have been corrected.

Jonathan Neal Pruitt is a former academic researcher. He was an Associate Professor of behavioral ecology and Canada 150 Research Chair in Biological Dystopias at McMaster University. Pruitt's research focused primarily on animal personalities and the social behavior of spiders and other organisms.

Abida Sophie Jamal is a Canadian endocrinologist and former osteoporosis researcher who was at the centre of a scientific misconduct case in the mid-to-late 2010s. Jamal published a high-profile paper suggesting that the heart medication nitroglycerin was a treatment for osteoporosis, and was later demonstrated to have misrepresented her results. She received a lifetime ban from receiving funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and was named directly in their disclosure report, becoming the first person mentioned by name by the institute for scientific misconduct. Jamal was later stripped of her medical license for two years, regaining it in a controversial 3–2 decision.

Terminal digit preference, terminal digit bias, or end-digit preference is a commonly-observed statistical phenomenon whereby humans recording numbers have a bias or preference for a specific final digit in a number. In medical science, this is often seen when recording measurements such as blood pressure by hand, where those taking measurements will round to the nearest 5 or 0. The phenomenon has been blamed for misdiagnoses. Terminal digit bias has been used to identify errors in research, and is one method used in the identification of scientific fraud. Severe terminal digit bias has been found in datasets for scientific papers that were later retracted

References

  1. 1 2 3 Wansink, Brian (2016). "Brian Wansink Academic Vita". Solve & Share. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 Singal, Jesse (February 8, 2017). "A Popular Diet-Science Lab Has Been Publishing Really Shoddy Research". New York magazine. Retrieved February 20, 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 O'Grady, Cathleen (April 24, 2017). ""Mindless Eating," or how to send an entire life of research into question". Ars Technica.
  4. ↑ Lee, Stephanie M. (February 25, 2018). "Sliced And Diced: The Inside Story Of How An Ivy League Food Scientist Turned Shoddy Data Into Viral Studies". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024.
  5. 1 2 "Caught Our Notice: Retraction eight as errors in Wansink paper are "too voluminous" for a correction". Retraction Watch. March 19, 2018.
  6. 1 2 3 4 "Cornell Just Found Brian Wansink Guilty Of Scientific Misconduct And He Has Resigned". BuzzFeed News . September 20, 2018. Archived from the original on September 20, 2018. Retrieved September 20, 2018.
  7. 1 2 Oransky, Ivan (December 5, 2018). "The Joy of Cooking, vindicated: Journal retracts two more Brian Wansink papers". Retraction Watch. Retrieved December 5, 2018.
  8. ↑ "Retraction Watch Database". Retraction Watch. Center for Scientific Integrity. Retrieved June 5, 2020.
  9. 1 2 "Brian Wansink Ph.D." HealthCorps. Archived from the original on October 19, 2017. Retrieved June 8, 2017.
  10. 1 2 Jenkins, Robin Mather (March 30, 2005). "The wizard of why". www.chicagotribune.com. Tribune Digital. Archived from the original on March 1, 2024. Retrieved July 16, 2018.
  11. ↑ Jiggetts, Jennifer (November 27, 2010). "Teaching, preaching: Norfolk man has two callings". Virginian-Pilot. Retrieved April 20, 2018.
  12. ↑ "Distinguished Alumni". Tau Kappa Epsilon . Retrieved November 11, 2023.
  13. 1 2 3 Severson, Kim (October 11, 2006). "Seduced by Snacks? No, Not You". The New York Times.
  14. ↑ "Behind the Headlines: Eating with a fat friend 'makes you eat more'". National Health Service. October 6, 2014.
  15. ↑ Schachtman, Todd; Reilly, Steve (2011). Associative learning and conditioning theory: human and non-human applications. Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780199735969. OCLC   664352638.
  16. ↑ Leonhardt, David (May 2, 2007). "Your Plate Is Bigger Than Your Stomach". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved June 26, 2017.
  17. ↑ "Ig Nobel Prizes Stranger Than Fiction". Science. October 5, 2007.
  18. ↑ Etchells, Pete; Chambers, Chris (February 16, 2018). "Mindless eating: is there something rotten behind the research?". The Guardian.
  19. ↑ Ross, Madeline K.B. (October 25, 2006). "Why Do I Keep Super Sizing Me?". The Harvard Crimson.
  20. ↑ Kennedy, Jack L. (October 31, 2006). "Joplin Independent: Mindless Eating is a nourishing read". Joplin Independent.
  21. ↑ "MeMe Roth And National Action Against Obesity Name 2006 Heroes and Villains in U.S. Fight Against Obesity". PRWeb. December 19, 2006. Retrieved April 1, 2018.
  22. ↑ "Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think | Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research". obssr.od.nih.gov. March 10, 2016. Retrieved December 21, 2023.
  23. ↑ "Study that took aim at 'Joy of Cooking' is retracted". NBC News. Associated Press. December 6, 2018. Retrieved December 7, 2018.
  24. ↑ Rosner, Helen (March 21, 2018). "The Strange, Uplifting Tale of "Joy of Cooking" Versus the Food Scientist". New Yorker.
  25. ↑ Lee, Stephanie (February 23, 2018). "An Ivy League Scientist Raised $10,000 On Kickstarter For A Weight-Loss Program That Never Launched". BuzzFeed.
  26. ↑ Lang, Susan S. (November 20, 2007). "Wansink accepts 14-month appointment as executive director of USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion : Cornell Chronicle". Cornell Chronicle.
  27. ↑ "Past Presidents". SNEB. Retrieved March 18, 2018.
  28. ↑ Dahlberg, Brett (September 26, 2018). "Cornell Food Researcher's Downfall Raises Larger Questions For Science". NPR.org. Retrieved January 16, 2020.
  29. ↑ Bartlett, Tom (March 17, 2017). "Spoiled Science". The Chronicle of Higher Education.
  30. ↑ "Cornell University Statement Regarding Questions About Professor Brian Wansink's Research | Cornell Chronicle". news.cornell.edu. April 7, 2017. Retrieved July 16, 2018.
  31. 1 2 "Another retraction to appear for Cornell food scientist Brian Wansink". Retraction Watch. December 28, 2017.
  32. ↑ Bauchner, Howard (2018). "Expression of Concern: Wansink B, Cheney MM. Super Bowls: Serving Bowl Size and Food Consumption. JAMA 2005; 293(14):1727-1728". JAMA. 319 (18): 1869. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4908 . PMID   29710107.
  33. ↑ "JAMA journals retract six papers by food marketing researcher Brian Wansink". Retraction Watch. September 19, 2018.
  34. ↑ "Retraction Watch Database: Wansink" . Retrieved March 18, 2018.
  35. ↑ "Retract, replace, retract: Beleaguered food researcher pulls article from JAMA journal (again)". Retraction Watch. October 20, 2017.
  36. ↑ Dahlberg, Brett (November 6, 2018). "Cornell finds laboratory head falsified data". www.wrvo.org. Retrieved December 6, 2018.
  37. ↑ Richtel, Matt (June 20, 2012). "Putting the Squeeze on a Family Ritual". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved August 13, 2020.
  38. ↑ Butler, Kiera (March 2015). "This fast-food-loving, organics-hating Ivy League prof will trick you into eating better". Mother Jones. Retrieved July 16, 2018.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.