The proposals for digital ID has received opposition from Labour MPs and other political leaders due to concerns around the possible infringement of civil liberties, with Big Brother Watch describing the plans as "wholly unBritish" and creating a "domestic mass surveillance infrastructure". It has been compared to the abandoned mandatory ID card scheme of former prime minister Tony Blair. A petition against mandatory digital ID cards has reached 2.8million signatures as of 4 October 2025.
Background
A previous national ID card scheme was passed in 2006 by Labour, however it was repealed by the Conservative/Liberal Democrat Coalition in 2011.[1] In 2024, the then home secretary Yvette Cooper said that ID cards were not in the manifesto and not their approach, in response to Tony Blair's calls for digital ID,[2][3] which he promoted as a method to tackle immigration, although he admitted the idea was 'scary'.[4] Blair's Tony Blair Institute for Global Change continued to call for digital ID in 2025,[5] with Blair arguing that British people would sacrifice privacy for efficiency.[6] In April 2025, an open letter signed by over 40 Labour MPs called for ministers to introduce digital IDs.[7] In September, the Tony Blair Institute proposed a 'super ID card' to consolidate public interactions with the government into one place, such as for reporting potholes and applying for benefits.[8]
Many Labour MPs have opposed the policy because of concerns around the possible infringement of civil liberties.[22][23]Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has stated her party would oppose mandatory ID cards.[24] Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn called it an 'affront to our civil liberties'.[25][26][27]Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has stated he is 'firmly opposed' to the proposal, and that it 'will make no difference to illegal migration'.[28]Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey said his party would fight the policy "tooth and nail",[29] comparing it to the abandoned mandatory ID card scheme of former Labour prime minister Tony Blair.[30] A petition against mandatory digital ID cards has reached over 2.8 million signatures as of 4 October 2025,[31][32] making it one of the largest in parliamentary history.[33] The UK government responded on 2 October 2025, saying “We will introduce a digital ID within this Parliament to help tackle illegal migration, make accessing government services easier, and enable wider efficiencies. We will consult on details soon.”[34]
Big Brother Watch has described the plans for mandatory digital ID as "wholly unBritish" and creating a "domestic mass surveillance infrastructure",[35] and that they would be "uniquely harmful to privacy, equality, and civil liberties.".[36] Critics have also claimed that it is unlikely to stop small boat crossings,[37] as well as the risk of cyber attacks and incentive to allow the data ot be used to train AI models.[38][39]
Nationalist leaders in Scotland and Northern Ireland have criticised the scheme due to both concerns around civil liberties and also the potential for the ID scheme to force citizens to declare themselves as British. In September 2025, Scottish National Party (SNP) first minister John Swinney and Northern Irish Sinn Féin first minister Michelle O'Neill declared their opposition to the ID scheme.[12][40] Swinney said "people should go about their daily lives without such infringements" and said the ID scheme appeared like an attempt to "force every Scot to declare ourselves British. I am a Scot."[12] O'Neill called the proposal an "an attack on the rights of Irish citizens" and the Good Friday Agreement, which allows citizens of Northern Ireland to legally identify as either British, Irish or both.[40][41] In response, the UK Government said the ID scheme would respect the agreement.[41] Northern Irish unionist parties also joined in their opposition to the policy, with Democratic Unionist Party leader Gavin Robinson describing it as "yet another layer of bureaucracy for ordinary citizens" which will do "very little to stop illegal immigration" and a spokesman of the Ulster Unionist Party calling it "an excessive and ill-conceived initiative that compromises the fundamental right to privacy for law-abiding citizens".[41]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
